Adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with early stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Controversies in the management of mucinous ovarian tumors

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, comprising less than 5% of all cases, and distinguished by its unique molecular, histologic, and clinical features. Its rarity and marked differences from other ovarian cancer subtypes have led to significant controversies regarding its diagnosis, surgical strategies, and systemic therapies. Accurate differentiation between primary and metastatic MOCs remains a critical challenge because of their overlapping features with gastrointestinal cancers, often leading to misclassification. This can result in suboptimal management and impaired patient outcomes, thus highlighting the importance of high-quality pathologic reviews. The surgical approach to MOC is highly controversial. In early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery should be systematically considered in young patients, although its feasibility requires careful consideration. In addition, systematic staging lymphadenectomy, which has been de-escalated for patients with expansile MOC, is recommended for those with early-stage infiltrative MOC. In advanced-stage disease, where tumors are often bulky and chemoresistant, the benefits of extensive cytoreduction must be balanced against surgical morbidities. MOC poses significant challenges for systemic treatment owing to its poor response rate to standard ovarian cancer chemotherapy regimens. Alternative therapeutic strategies offer promise but lack robust clinical validation, including gastrointestinal-based regimens, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (eg, trastuzumab deruxtecan), and immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite unstable MOC. Furthermore, pre-clinical and early phase trials have suggested the potential of combination strategies, including RAS pathway and WEE1 inhibitors. Addressing these controversies requires a multidisciplinary approach that underscores the importance of histologic subtyping and molecular profiling to guide personalized treatment. International collaboration is essential for overcoming the rarity of MOC by enabling larger studies and global registries. These efforts are pivotal for improving diagnostic accuracy, expanding therapeutic options, and, ultimately, enhancing outcomes in patients with this challenging malignancy.

Fertility Sparing Medical Management Options in Gynecologic Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

There is an increasing use of medical management for gynecologic cancers given the rise in neoadjuvant therapies, delayed childbearing, and use of assisted reproductive technology. Chemotherapy, albeit broadly used in most gynecologic cancers, lacks long term data with respect to its associated gonadotoxicity and potential adverse pregnancy outcomes. Immunotherapy and other targeted therapies that have demonstrated promising responses in other tumor types are increasingly being studied in gynecologic malignancies. These therapies may offer opportunities for enhanced treatment response in an effort to minimize more toxic, invasive, or surgical management approaches that could have significant negative implications on fertility. Given that some of these therapies do not represent the standard of care and currently only exist in the experimental setting, detailed counseling and careful selection of patients for fertility sparing treatment remains critical. It is reasonable for patients with early stage, low-risk endometrial cancers to attempt conservative management while establishing clear treatment objectives. Early involvement of fertility specialists is necessary in order to optimize these patients' pregnancy goals. An emphasis on lifestyle changes and in particular weight loss should also be discussed with these patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervix cancer patients with low-risk, small tumors shows promising results that suggest this can be a safe treatment option. Patients with advanced stage disease of any primary tumor or aggressive histology such as in many cases of ovarian cancer are not appropriate candidates for prioritization of fertility sparing treatment options. Ongoing and future studies will help to better identify appropriate patients and maximize medical management options in early-stage gynecologic cancers.

Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the effect of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in patients presenting with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and to delineate patient characteristics that may indicate a greater benefit from pelvic lymph node dissection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on individuals diagnosed with clinical stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer who received primary cytoreductive surgery at the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Harbin Medical University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2018. The investigation encompassed an examination of demographic data, clinicopathological profiles, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 315 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer were incorporated into the study and were segregated into two distinct cohorts: 217 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (Group A) and 98 patients who did not undergo the procedure (Group B). The disparities in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two cohorts did not attain statistical significance (p > 0.05). Upon conducting a subgroup analysis, it was discerned that patients characterized by clear cell carcinoma as the pathological subtype demonstrated a significantly extended progression-free survival post-lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02). Additionally, the operative duration for the patients in Group A was significantly protracted in comparison to Group B (146.15 ± 39.132 min vs. 133.49 ± 35.308 min, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

For patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival rates. Our findings suggest that individuals with clear cell carcinoma pathology have a higher probability of benefiting in terms of survival following lymph node dissection.

Clinicopathological and Oncological Outcomes of Borderline Mucinous Tumours of Ovary: a Large Case Series

The objective is to study the clinico-demographic profile, treatment patterns and oncological outcomes in borderline mucinous tumours of the ovary. Retrospective cohort analysis was carried out between January 2017 and December 2019 for patients with a diagnosis of borderline mucinous tumours of the ovary who were treated at our centre. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the estimation of the probability of DFS and OS. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on the Cox proportional hazard model were performed to identify factors associated with DFS and OS. A p-value ≤ 0.05 in a two-tailed test was considered statistically significant. The study population included 75 patients and the median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 24 months. The 5-year DFS for the entire cohort was 79.6% and OS was 90.5%, whereas for stage I disease, 5-year OS was 92.6% as opposed to 60% in the advanced stage. On univariate analysis, only the stage of the disease had a significant association with DFS and OS. Fertility-preserving surgeries had no impact on OS or DFS, and hence, it is suggested that fertility-sparing surgeries may be considered a viable option in young patients with mucinous ovarian tumours. Borderline mucinous tumours of the ovary have excellent survival outcomes and fertility-sparing surgeries should be done whenever feasible.

Is routine gastrointestinal endoscopy required in every woman with mucinous ovarian cancer? An analysis of survival rates and metastatic tumours in a cancer centre

INTRODUCTION

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) represents a rare entity of ovarian malignant neoplasms. The true incidence could be as low as 3% of all ovarian cancers. The aim of this study is to compare and understand the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with mucinous ovarian cancer, report on the survival rates and evaluate the role of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy as part of the peri-operative investigations and the impact it has on the survival rates.

METHODOLOGY

This is a retrospective data collection on patients with MOC operated in Nottingham gynaecological oncology centre over a 10-year period. Data were analysed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

43 cases were included in the final analysis. The median maximal tumour diameter was 180 mm. 32 (74.5 %) and 11 (25.5 %) women presented with unilateral and bilateral tumours respectively. 30 patients (69.7 %) presented with stage 1 disease, 1 (2.3 %) presented with stage 2 disease, 7 women (16.4 %) had stage 3 disease and 1 woman (11.6 %) had stage 4 disease. 41 women had staging surgical procedures and 2 women had limited surgery due to poor performance status. After final histology, 5 cases found to have metastatic disease to the ovary rather than primary MOC. 14 women had GI endoscopy as part of their investigation. The total estimated cost of the endoscopies that have been performed is £5635. Primary GI cancer was diagnosed in 1 case during the endoscopy (1 case of gastric cancer). The 5-year overall survival of the women included in this study is 62.8 %. The 5-year overall survival of the women in the endoscopy and non-endoscopy groups was 60 % and 64.3 % respectively (p-value: 0.767).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that the survival rates of patients treated for mucinous ovarian cancer in our centre are similar to other published studies. Our findings do not support the routine use of GI endoscopy in the peri-operative investigations of every patient with MOC due to the non-statistically significant difference in the overall survival.

Influence of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC).

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched from four online databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the effects of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates. A subgroup analysis was performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity, followed by sensitivity and publication bias assessments.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles involving 22,178 subjects were included. Meta-analysis revealed that lymphadenectomy was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI:0.61, 0.84; P < 0.001), improved PFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.80; P < 0.001), and reduced recurrence rates (RR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.85; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that factors including area, histology, and source of the control group were significantly related to improved OS and PFS in patients with eEOC. Sensitivity analysis showed that the combined results were stable and reliable, and no significant publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with eEOC can benefit from lymphadenectomy, with improved survival outcomes (OS and PFS) and a lower recurrence rate.

Mucins and mucinous ovarian carcinoma: Development, differential diagnosis, and treatment

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare histological type of epithelial ovarian cancer. It has poor response to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and PARPi-based maintenance treatment, resulting in short survival and poor prognosis in advanced-disease patients. MOC is characterized by mucus that is mainly composed of mucin in the cystic cavity. Our review discusses in detail the role of mucins in MOC. Mucins are correlated with MOC development. Furthermore, they are valuable in the differential diagnosis of primary and secondary ovarian mucinous tumors. Some types of mucins have been studied in the context of chemoresistance and targeted therapy for ovarian cancer. This review may provide a new direction for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced MOC.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery

BACKGROUND

Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC) is a relatively uncommon subtype of ovarian cancer with special prognostic features, but there is insufficient research in this area. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of mEOC based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and externally validate it in National Union of Real World Gynecological Oncology Research and Patient Management (NUWA) platform from China.

METHODS

Patients screened from SEER database were allocated into training and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 7: 3, with those from NUWA platform as an external validation cohort. Significant factors selected by Cox proportional hazard regression were applied to establish a nomogram for 3-year and 5-year CSS. The performance of nomogram was assessed by concordance index, calibration curves and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves.

RESULTS

The training cohort (n = 572) and internal validation cohort (n = 246) were filtered out from SEER database. The external validation cohort contained 186 patients. Baseline age, tumor stage, histopathological grade, lymph node metastasis and residual disease after primary surgery were significant risk factors (p < 0.05) and were included to develop the nomogram. The C-index of nomogram in training, internal validation and external validation cohort were 0.869 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.838-0.900), 0.839 (95% CI, 0.787-0.891) and 0.800 (95% CI, 0.738-0.862), respectively. The calibration curves of 3-year and 5-year CSS in each cohort showed favorable agreement between prediction and observation. K-M curves of different risk groups displayed great discrimination.

CONCLUSION

The discrimination and goodness of fit of the nomogram indicated its satisfactory predictive value for the CSS of mEOC in SEER database and external validation in China, which implies its potential application in different populations.

Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer.

Materials and Methods

Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict the factors that contribute to recurrence, the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions were utilized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized for survival and the log-rank test was used for the discrepancies between the groups. In the analysis of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22 program was used. It was acknowledged to have statistical meaning when the P value in all the tests was lower than 0.05.

Findings

Recurrence was detected in 20 out of 44 patients who participated in the study. The ages of the patients who did not experience recurrence were significantly lower ( P = 0.001). The patients were detected mostly in Stage 1 (36.4%). In the group of patients without recurrence, systemic lymphadenectomy (43.2%) was greater ( P = 0.019). Lymph node metastasis was three times higher in the group that experienced recurrence ( P = 0.047). When the two groups were compared, the platinum resistance was considerably greater in the group with recurrence ( P = 0.005). In terms of residual tumor, the rate of complete resection was (9%) better in the group that experienced recurrence compared to the group that did not experience recurrence, with a rate of 45.5%. While 12 patients who experienced recurrence died, 6 people died in the other group. From the factors that contribute to recurrence, in terms of residual tumor quantity, this was grouped as complete (R0) resection and optimal + suboptimal (R1 + R2) resection and the following were determined: odds ratio (OR) - 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-20.9) and P = 0.008 for R1 + R2. In univariate analysis, the OR was determined as 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for age. Possessing a Stage 2 and higher disease statistically contributed considerably to the recurrence compared to Stage 1 disease (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.59-25.22; P = 0.009). Age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25]), P = 0.018. Furthermore, the OR for the advanced-stage (Stage 2 or higher) patients in the multivariate analysis was determined as 7.88 (95% CI: 0.78-78.8) and was found to be statistically significant at limits ( P = 0.079).

Results

We have put forth that the genetic, biological, and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from that of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and that age, advanced stage, and residual tumor quantity are prognostic risk factors in terms of recurrence, and that age is an independent prognostic risk factor.

Conclusion

Biological and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from those of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and we observed that the age, advanced stage, and the amount of residual tumor regarding recurrence are prognostic risk factors, while age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor.

Update on Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer

This review includes state-of-the-art prognostic and predictive factors of mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC), a rare tumor. Clinical, pathological, and molecular features and treatment options according to prognosis are comprehensively discussed. Different clinical implications of MOC are described according to the The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage: early MOC (stage I-II) and advanced MOC (stage III-IV). Early MOC is characterized by a good prognosis. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Fertility-sparing surgery could be performed in patients who wish to become pregnant and that present low recurrence risk of disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended, except in patients with high-risk clinical and pathological features. Regarding the histological features, an infiltrative growth pattern is the major prognostic factor of MOC. Furthermore, novel molecular biomarkers are emerging for tailored management of early-stage MOC. In contrast, advanced MOC is characterized by poor survival. Radical surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, although the efficacy is limited by the intrinsic chemoresistance of these tumors. Several molecular hallmarks of advanced MOC have been described in recent years (e.g., HER2 amplification, distinct methylation profiles, peculiar immunological microenvironment), but target therapy for these rare tumors is not available yet.

The effect of chemotherapy in patients with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery

Objective

To determine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) undergoing fertility-preserving surgery.

Patients and methods

The clinicopathological characteristics and survival information of young women with stage I MOC from SEER databases between 2004 and 2019 were collected. The relationship between chemotherapy and the characteristics was examined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Univariable and multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis were employed for cancer-specific survival. Cox analysis was performed to build a nomogram model.

Results

All 901 eligible patients with stage I MOC were screened from the SEER database. There were 321(35.6%) patients aged 9-30 years, 580(64.4%) aged 31-45 years, 645 (71.6%) patients with stage IA/IB, 256 (28.4%) with stage IC disease, 411(45.6%) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, and276(30.6%) who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that postoperative chemotherapy was often used in patients aged 31-45 relative to aged 9-30 (HR: 2.215, 95%CI 1.443-3.401, P &lt; 0.001) or with grade 3 compared to grade 1 tumors (HR: 7.382, 95%CI 4.054-13.443, P &lt; 0.001) or with stage IC compared to stage IA/IB (HR: 6.436, 95%CI 4.515-9.175, P &lt; 0.001) or with non-fertility sparing surgery relative to fertility-sparing (HR:2.226, 95%CI 1.490-3.327, P &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis for the special population with fertility preservation indicated that patients with chemotherapy (HR: 2.905, 95% CI: 0.938-6.030, P=0.068) or with grade 3 (HR: 4.750, 95% CI: 1.419-15.896, P=0.011) had a greater risk of mortality. Significant CSS differences were observed between the non-chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups in MOC when patients were stage IA/IB-grade 2 (P=0.004) (10-year CSS rates of chemotherapy=84%, non-chemotherapy = 100%), but not when they were stage IA/IB-grade 1, stage IA/IB-grade 3 or stage IC (both P&gt;0.05). A prognostic prediction nomogram model was built for stage I MOC patient who underwent fertility-sparing and the C-index was 0.709.

Discussion

The patients aged 31-45 years, with grade 3, stage IC, and non-fertility-sparing surgery were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy in the real world. For stage I MOC patient who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, the choice of chemotherapy may increase the risk of death, and it should be carefully selected in clinical practice.

Primary mucinous ovarian cancer: options for surgery and chemotherapy

Primary mucinous ovarian cancer is a rare type of epithelial ovarian cancer. In this comprehensive review we discuss management recommendations for the treatment of mucinous ovarian cancer. Although most tumors are stage I at diagnosis, 15-20% are advanced stage at diagnosis. Traditionally, patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer have been treated similarly to those with the more common serous ovarian cancer. However, recent studies have shown that mucinous ovarian cancer is very different from other types of epithelial ovarian cancer. Primary mucinous ovarian cancer is less likely to spread to lymph nodes or the upper abdomen and more likely to affect younger women, who may desire fertility-sparing therapies. Surgical management of mucinous ovarian cancer mirrors surgical management of other types of epithelial ovarian cancer and includes a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and total hysterectomy. When staging is indicated, it should include pelvic washing, omentectomy, and peritoneal biopsies; lymph node evaluation should be considered in patients with infiltrative tumors. The appendix should be routinely evaluated intra-operatively, but an appendectomy may be omitted if the appendix appears grossly normal. Fertility preservation can be considered in patients with gross disease confined to one ovary and a normal-appearing contralateral ovary. Patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease whose disease distribution suggests a high likelihood of complete gross resection may be candidates for secondary debulking. Primary mucinous ovarian cancer seems to be resistant to standard platinum-and-taxane regimens used frequently for other types of ovarian cancer. Gastrointestinal cancer regimens are another option; these include 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, or capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Data on heated intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for mucinous ovarian cancer are scarce, but HIPEC may be worth considering. For patients with recurrence or progression on first-line chemotherapy, we advocate enrollment in a clinical trial if one is available. For this reason, it may be beneficial to perform molecular testing in all patients with recurrent or progressive mucinous ovarian cancer.

Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma

Background

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has been widely used for patients with early-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the reproductive outcomes as well as the impact of growth pattern on oncological outcomes after FSS. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with stage I primary MOC after FSS.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 159 women with histologically confirmed unilateral stage I MOC treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1997 and 2019. Sixty-seven cases were pathologically reviewed for the growth pattern. Seventy-eight patients had FSS, defined as conservation of the uterus and at least part of one ovary, while 81 underwent radical surgery (RS). Oncofertility outcomes were compared between the groups and clinicopathological factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients in the FSS group were contacted to collect data on reproductive outcomes.

Results

Eighteen patients developed recurrent disease during a median follow-up of 69 months, including 12 in the FSS and six in the RS group. There was one death each in the FSS and RS groups. There was no significant difference in DFS between the groups. CA125 >35 U/ml, stage IC, and incomplete staging were correlated with worse DFS according to multivariate analysis (P=0.001; 0.020 (stage IC) and 0.004 (incomplete staging) respectively). There was no significant difference in DFS between patients with stage IA and stage IC1 in the FSS group, while DFS was poorer in patients with stage IC2/3 than stage IA (P=0.028). In addition, DFS was significantly poorer in patients who underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) compared with those receiving USO plus staging surgery (P=0.015). There was a tendency towards poorer DFS in the infiltrative tumors compared with the expansile tumors (P=0.056). Of 23 patients who attempted to conceive, 21 (91.3%) achieved 27 pregnancies, including 26 spontaneous pregnancies and one following assisted reproductive technology. Twenty patients gave birth to 24 healthy babies, including 21 full-term and three premature births. The live-birth rate was 88.9%.

Conclusions

FSS is a suitable option for young women with unilateral stage I expansile MOC, with acceptable oncological outcomes and meaningful pregnancy rates. Re-staging should be proposed in patients who undergo incomplete staging surgery.

A Nomogram Based on SEER Database for Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Mucinous Ovarian Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) is a rare histological type of EOC. In order to guide the clinical diagnosis and management of MOC patients, we constructed and verified a nomogram for the estimation of overall survival in patients with MOC.

Patients and Methods

We collected 494 patients with MOC diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 in SEER database, and the following main inclusion criteria were used: (1) patients whose MOC was confirmed by pathology; (2) patients without a history of primary other cancer. Subsequently, we performed randomized grouping (6:4) and Cox hazard regression analysis in the training group. Subsequently, the nomogram was established. A variety of indicators were used to validate the prognosis value of nomogram, including the C-index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Moreover, Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare the survival results among different risk subgroups.

Results

Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that age, grade, FIGO stage and log odds of positive lymph nodes stage were independent risk factors for patients with MOC. In the training group, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.791–0.863) and the areas under the curve (AUC) predicting the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate were 0.853 (95% CI: 0.791–0.915), 0.886 (95% CI: 0.852–0.920) and 0.815 (95% CI: 0.766–0.864), respectively. The calibration curve revealed that the nomogram of the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate was consistent with the actual fact. Patients with high risk had a poorer prognosis than those with low risk (P < 0.001). DCA revealed that the nomogram had the best clinical value than other classical prognostic markers. Similarly, nomogram had excellent prognostic ability in the testing group.

Conclusion

The nomogram was constructed to predict overall survival in patients with MOC, which had the significance for clinical evaluation.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for young women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who have undergone fertility-sparing surgery?: a multicenter retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

In young patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) who were received fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. Here, we performed a multicenter study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to explore the effect of chemotherapy on patients' survival.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2015, a retrospective study was carried out, including 1183 patients with stage I EOC. Among them, a total of 101 women with stage I EOC who underwent FSS were investigated, including 64 and 37 patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two arms using original and IPTW cohorts.

RESULTS

During 62.6 months (median) of follow-up, recurrence was noted in 11 (17.2%) women in the chemotherapy arm and 6 (16.2%) patients in the observation arm. In the unweighted cohort, the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival (OS/RFS) rates of chemotherapy and observation arms were 86.3/80.8 and 90.2/79.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups {Log-rank: P = 0.649 (OS)/P = 0.894 (RFS)}. In the IPTW cohort after adjusting for various clinicopathologic covariates, we also failed to identify a difference in RFS/OS between the two groups {RFS (chemotherapy vs. observation), HR: 0.501 (95% CI 0.234-1.072), P = 0.075: OS (chemotherapy vs. observation), HR: 0.939 (95% CI 0.330-2.669), P = 0.905}.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjusting clinicopathologic covariates, performing adjuvant chemotherapy may not improve the oncologic outcome in young patients who have undergone FSS.

Clinicopathological Determinants of Recurrence Risk and Survival in Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a unique form of ovarian cancer. MOC typically presents at early stage but demonstrates intrinsic chemoresistance; treatment of advanced-stage and relapsed disease is therefore challenging. We harness a large retrospective MOC cohort to identify factors associated with recurrence risk and survival. A total of 151 MOC patients were included. The 5 year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 84.5%. Risk of subsequent recurrence after a disease-free period of 2 and 5 years was low (8.3% and 5.6% over the next 10 years). The majority of cases were FIGO stage I (35.6% IA, 43.0% IC). Multivariable analysis identified stage and pathological grade as independently associated with DSS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Grade 1 stage I patients represented the majority of cases (53.0%) and demonstrated exceptional survival (10 year DSS 95.3%); survival was comparable between grade I stage IA and stage IC patients, and between grade I stage IC patients who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. At 5 years following diagnosis, the proportion of grade 1, 2 and 3 patients remaining disease free was 89.5%, 74.9% and 41.7%; the corresponding proportions for FIGO stage I, II and III/IV patients were 91.1%, 76.7% and 19.8%. Median post-relapse survival was 5.0 months. Most MOC patients present with low-grade early-stage disease and are at low risk of recurrence. New treatment options are urgently needed to improve survival following relapse, which is associated with extremely poor prognosis.

Options for the Treatment of Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Complete surgical resection is the gold-standard treatment for all mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) cases. Advanced-stage disease is often additionally treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy; however, these were developed largely against the more common high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and have low efficacy in treating MOC. More effective therapeutics are needed to treat late-stage and platinum-resistant tumors; however, traditional drug development and clinical trial paradigms are a major challenge for such a rare disease. New approaches to support evidence-based treatment decisions are required, such as registry trials. Recently, a number of targeted therapies have emerged as viable treatment options in other cancer types, and for some of these, the actionable tumor mutations are also seen in MOC. Thus, a promising alternative approach to provide benefit to current MOC patients involves DNA sequencing to identify a tumor's unique mutational profile and allow matching to available targeted agents. Such a pipeline can involve special approval to administer a drug already approved for clinical use in other cancer types to a given MOC patient, or their inclusion in existing ongoing clinical trials, such as basket trials encompassing patients with tumors from a range of anatomical sites. Implementation of such personalized medicine can be boosted using improved pre-clinical models, where through a clinical research collaboration a patient's own tumor cells can be used to a test a range of putative therapies prior to administration in the clinic, enabling selection of the available pharmaceutical/s that give any given patient the best possible chance of cancer remission.

Prognostic similarity between ovarian mucinous carcinoma with expansile invasion and ovarian mucinous borderline tumor: A retrospective analysis

There is a similarity of histological features and survival between ovarian mucinous carcinoma (MC) with expansile invasion and ovarian mucinous borderline tumor (MBT). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of MC with expansile invasion with those of MBT based on the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.A pathological review was performed on patients with MC, ovarian MBT, and seromucinous borderline tumors that underwent surgery at our hospital between 1984 and 2019. Clinicopathological features were compared retrospectively between MC with expansile invasion and MBT.Among 83 cases of MC, 85 cases of MBT, and 12 cases of seromucinous borderline tumor, 25 MC cases with expansile invasion and 98 MBT cases were included through review. MC cases with expansile invasion were diagnosed with advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages more frequently (P = .02) than that of MBT cases. In addition, patients with MC with expansile invasion received adjuvant chemotherapy more often (P < .01) than that of patients with MBT. There were no statistically significant differences in recurrence rate (P = .10) between MC with expansile invasion and MBT. Progression-free survival (PFS) was worse in MC cases with expansile invasion than that in MBT cases (P = .01). However, a multivariate analysis for PFS showed that histological subtype, FIGO stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not an independent prognostic factor.The prognostic outcome of MC with expansile invasion might mimic those of MBT. These results showed ovarian borderline tumor treatment could be applied to MC treatment.

Long term survival outcomes of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer - A clinical calculator predictive of chemotherapy benefit

OBJECTIVES

To determine the long-term potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in subgroups of high-risk stage I mucinous ovarian cancer patients using a predictive scoring algorithm.

METHODS

Data were collected from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. Based on demographic and surgical characteristics, a novel 10-year survival prognostic scoring system was developed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

There were 2041 eligible patients with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer including 1362 (67%) with stage IA/IB disease, 598 (29%) with stage IC disease, and 81 (4%) with stage I disease not otherwise specified. Median age was 52 with a range of 13-90 years old. 737 (36%) patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in patients with stage IC relative to stage IA/IB disease (69% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) or with poorly-differentiated relative to well-differentiated tumors (69% vs. 23%, P < 0.001). Unadjusted 10-year survival was 81% relative to 79% for patients treated with vs. without chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.46). Patients were predicted to exhibit a low- or a high-risk of death using a multivariate Cox regression model with age, stage, grade, lymphovascular space invasion and ascites. Risk of death without vs. with adjuvant chemotherapy was similar in low-risk patients (88% vs. 84%; HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.56-1.15, P = 0.23) and worse in high-risk patients (51% vs. 74%; HR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.05-2.38, P = 0.03) with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive scoring algorithm may provide prognostic information on long-term survival and identify high-risk stage I mucinous ovarian cancer patients who might achieve a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Mucinous Cancer of the Ovary: Overview and Current Status

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Whereas all EOC subtypes are addressed in the same way, MOC is a distinct entity. Appreciating the pathological features and genomic profile of MOC may result in the improvement in management and, hence, the prognosis. Distinguishing primary MOC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma can be challenging but is essential. Early-stage MOC carries an excellent prognosis, with advanced disease having a poor outcome. Surgical management plays an essential role in the early stage and in metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is usually administered for stage II MOC and beyond. The standard gynecology protocol is frequently used, but gastrointestinal regimens have also been administered. As MOC is associated with multiple molecular alterations, targeted therapy could be the answer to treat this disease.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage endometrioid ovarian carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage IC grade 1 and stage IA/IB grade 2 endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma (EOOC) remains unclear as the NCCN guidelines recommend either observation only or adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, we sought to determine whether patients with stage I EOOC had improved overall survival (OS) following receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage I ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Demographics, pathologic factors including tumor grade, and treatment information including receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were collected. The impact of chemotherapy on OS was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared with log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 4538 patients were identified and the median age was 55 years The rate of adjuvant chemotherapy use was 50.9%. Higher rates were noted among patients with stage IC and grade 3 tumors. Following stratification by tumor grade, substage and extent of lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a survival benefit for patients with grade 2 tumors who did not undergo (stage IA/IB: 95.7% vs 83%, p = 0.038; stage IC: 84.5% vs 84.8%, p = 0.39) or had limited lymphadenectomy (stage IA/IB: 96% vs 89.5%, p = 0.03; stage IC: 97.2% vs 83.9%, p = 0.001). A survival difference was also seen for patients with grade 3 tumors who did not undergo lymphadenectomy but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an overall survival benefit for patients with inadequately-staged, grade 2 stage I ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma. A possible benefit for inadequately-staged patients with grade 3 tumors cannot be excluded.