1
|
Proppe L, Jaeger A, Goy Y, Petersen C, Kruell A, Prieske K, Schmalfeldt B, Mueller V, Woelber L. Systematic review - Adjuvant radiotherapy of the vulva in primary vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 190:264-271. [PMID: 39265464 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adjuvant radiotherapy to the vulva in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is frequently performed albeit strong evidence is lacking. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature on this topic. METHODS 19 retrospective studies were included and analyzed, focusing on the primary outcome of local recurrence. RESULTS The publications present conflicting results. While the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy to the groins in case of node-positive VSCC is well established, the indication criteria and effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy to the vulva remain unclear. Based on the studies included in this review, the current evidence suggests that adjuvant radiotherapy to the vulva might not significantly reduce the risk of recurrence or only in certain subgroups. CONCLUSION Most of the studies do not consider individual risk factors such as HPV status, resection margin, lymph node stage, grading and others. As a result, the comparability and reliability of these findings are limited. This review aims to highlight the need of further research addressing the risk stratification, considering both oncologic risk factors and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Proppe
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - A Jaeger
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Y Goy
- Department of Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - C Petersen
- Department of Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - A Kruell
- Department of Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - K Prieske
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Dysplasia Center at the Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - B Schmalfeldt
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - V Mueller
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - L Woelber
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Dysplasia Center at the Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pleunis N, Pouwer AFW, Oonk MHM, van Doorn HC, Tjiong MY, van der Velden J, Zijlmans H, van Poelgeest MIE, van Dorst EB, Slangen BFM, Verhoef LCG, Pijnenborg JMA, de Hullu JA. Incidence of inguinofemoral lymph node metastases at the first local recurrence of vulvar cancer: a Dutch nationwide study. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:956-964. [PMID: 37507545 PMCID: PMC10491599 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02373-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 40% of vulvar cancer patients present with local recurrence within 10 years of follow-up. An inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) is indicated if not performed at primary treatment. The incidence and risk factors for lymph node metastases (LNM) at first local recurrence, however, are unclear. Our aim was to determine the incidence of LNM at first local recurrence, in relation to previous groin treatment and clinicopathological factors. METHODS A multicenter cohort study including vulvar cancer patients with a first macroinvasive local recurrence after primary surgical treatment between 2000 and 2015 was conducted in the Netherlands. Groin status at local recurrence was defined as positive (N+), negative (N-) or unknown (N?) and based on histology, imaging and follow-up. Patient-, tumour- and treatment characteristics of primary and recurrent disease were analysed. RESULTS Overall, 16.3% (66/404) had a N+ groin status at first local recurrence, 66.4% (268/404) N- and 17.3% (70/404) N? groin status. The incidence of a N+ groin status was comparable after previous SLN and IFL, 11.5% and 13.8%, respectively. A N+ groin status was related to tumour size (25 vs.12 mm; P < 0.001), depth of invasion (5 vs. 3 mm; P < 0.001) and poorly differentiated tumours (22.9 vs. 11.9%; P = 0.050) at local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of LNM at first local recurrence in vulvar cancer patients was 16.3%, and independent of previous type of groin surgery. In accordance with primary diagnosis, tumour size, depth of invasion, and tumour grade were significantly associated with a positive groin status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noortje Pleunis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne-Floor W Pouwer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike H M Oonk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ming Y Tjiong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus van der Velden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henry Zijlmans
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eleonora B van Dorst
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lia C G Verhoef
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Center and Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oonk MHM, Planchamp F, Baldwin P, Mahner S, Mirza MR, Fischerová D, Creutzberg CL, Guillot E, Garganese G, Lax S, Redondo A, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Ulrikh E, Vandecaveye V, van der Zee A, Wölber L, Zach D, Zannoni GF, Zapardiel I. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1023-1043. [PMID: 37369376 PMCID: PMC10359596 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with gynecological cancers across Europe, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) first published in 2017 evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with vulvar cancer. OBJECTIVE To update the ESGO guidelines based on the new evidence addressing the management of vulvar cancer and to cover new topics in order to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of vulvar cancer. METHODS The ESGO Council nominated an international development group comprised of practicing clinicians who provide care to vulvar cancer patients and have demonstrated leadership through their expertize in clinical care and research, national and international engagement and profile as well as dedication to the topics addressed to serve on the expert panel (18 experts across Europe). To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, new data identified from a systematic search were reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 206 international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. RESULTS The updated guidelines cover comprehensively diagnosis and referral, staging, pathology, pre-operative investigations, surgical management (local treatment, groin treatment, sentinel lymph node procedure, reconstructive surgery), (chemo)radiotherapy, systemic treatment, treatment of recurrent disease (vulvar, inguinal, pelvic, and distant recurrences), and follow-up. Management algorithms are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike H M Oonk
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sven Mahner
- University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Daniela Fischerová
- Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Giorgia Garganese
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sigurd Lax
- Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria
- Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | | | - Elena Ulrikh
- Almazov National Medical Research Center, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | - Ate van der Zee
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Linn Wölber
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Zach
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet Eugeniavägen, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cordoba Largo S, Rodriguez Rodriguez I, Rodriguez Villalba S, Najjari Jamal D, Anchuelo Latorre J, Celada Alvarez F, Garcia Cabezas S, de la Fuente Alonso C, Couselo Paniagua L, Martinez Montesinos I, Villafranca Iturre E, Belinchon Olmeda B, Farga Albiol D, Navarrete Solano PA, Sanchez Belda M. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus technical guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 2: radiotherapy recommendations. Clin Transl Oncol 2023:10.1007/s12094-023-03101-z. [PMID: 36961728 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03101-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). This document provides an up-to-date review of the technical aspects in radiation treatment of vulvar cancer. METHODS A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus on the appropriateness of technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Three clinical scenarios were proposed: adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer, radiation treatment of locally advanced vulvar carcinoma and locoregional recurrences. After the first round, an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal was performed to define evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree and strongly disagree. RESULTS The main recommendations on external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, both in adjuvant setting and local advanced disease are summarized. Recommendations include treatment technique, treatment volume, and doses in target and organs at-risk. Taking into consideration the different clinical scenarios of recurrent disease, the radiation treatment should be individualized. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of robust clinical data, these recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Cordoba Largo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Dina Najjari Jamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institut of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Anchuelo Latorre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Garcia Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofía, University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Luz Couselo Paniagua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Dolores Farga Albiol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Maria Sanchez Belda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cordoba Largo S, Rodriguez Rodriguez I, Rodriguez Villalba S, Najjari Jamal D, Anchuelo Latorre J, Celada Álvarez F, Garcia Cabezas S, de la Fuente Alonso C, Couselo Paniagua L, Martínez Montesinos I, Villafranca Iturre E, Belinchón Olmeda B, Farga Albiol D, Navarrete Solano PA, Sánchez Belda M. Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations. Clin Transl Oncol 2023:10.1007/s12094-023-03095-8. [PMID: 36961727 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Given the lack of prospective data on the management of vulvar carcinoma, this document provides an up-to-date review of radiotherapy treatment in vulvar cancer and a series of consensus-based recommendations from a group of experts. METHODS A two-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus treatment recommendations in three clinical settings: 1) adjuvant treatment, 2) locally-advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC), and 3) recurrent disease. After the first round, we comprehensively reviewed the available medical literature from peer-reviewed journals to assess and define the evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. RESULTS The main recommendations were as follows: 1) following surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended with the presence of adverse risk factors (primarily positive margins and lymph node involvement); 2) radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) should be considered in LAVC; and 3) in recurrent disease, radiotherapy should be individualised on a case-by-case basis. A high level of agreement over 80% was reached. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of robust clinical data, these final recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Cordoba Largo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Dina Najjari Jamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institut of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Anchuelo Latorre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Sonia Garcia Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofía, University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | - Luz Couselo Paniagua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Dolores Farga Albiol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Fe, University Hospital and Politécnico, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - María Sánchez Belda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson EF, Wong RWC, Trevisan G, Tessier-Cloutier B, Almadani N, Chen J, Cheng A, Karnezis A, McConechy MK, Lum A, Senz J, McAlpine JN, Huntsman DG, Gilks B, Jamieson A, Hoang LN. p53-Abnormal "Fields of Dysplasia" in Human Papillomavirus-Independent Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Impacts Margins and Recurrence Risk. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100010. [PMID: 36853783 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Abnormal p53 (p53abn) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining patterns can be found in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN). They can also be found in the adjacent skin that shows morphology that falls short of the traditional diagnostic threshold for dVIN. Vulvectomy specimens containing human papillomavirus-independent p53abn VSCC with margins originally reported as negative for invasive and in situ disease were identified. Sections showing the closest approach by invasive or in situ neoplasia to margins were stained with p53 IHC stains. We evaluated the following: (1) detection of morphologically occult p53abn in situ neoplasia, (2) rates of margin status change after p53 IHC staining, and (3) effect of p53abn IHC staining at margins on the 2-year local recurrence rates. Seventy-three human papillomavirus-independent p53abn VSCCs were included. Half (35/73, 48%) had documented an in situ lesion in the original report. The use of p53 IHC staining identified 21 additional cases (29%) with the p53abn in situ lesions that were originally unrecognized. The histology of in situ lesions in the p53abn "field" varied and became more subtle (morphologically occult) farther away from the VSCC. Fifteen (21%) cases had a morphologically occult and previously unrecognized p53abn in situ lesion present at a resection margin, which conferred an increased risk of local recurrence (5/7 [71.4%] vs 6/22 [27.3%], P = .036). The p53abn in situ lesions at a margin were confirmed to have TP53 mutations by sequencing. p53 IHC staining identified morphologically occult p53abn in situ lesions surrounding human papillomavirus-independent VSCC. p53abn IHC staining at a margin was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Thompson
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard W C Wong
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Giorgia Trevisan
- Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Basile Tessier-Cloutier
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Noorah Almadani
- Department of Pathology, Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julia Chen
- Medical Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angela Cheng
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony Karnezis
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | | | - Amy Lum
- Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janine Senz
- Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Canexia Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Blake Gilks
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Jamieson
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lynn N Hoang
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adjuvant radiotherapy and local recurrence in vulvar cancer - a subset analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:68-75. [PMID: 34794839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to the vulva with regard to prognosis and local recurrence in patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC) is poorly described. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the AGO-CaRE-1 study 1618 patients with primary VSCC FIGO stage ≥ IB, treated between 1998-2008, were documented. In this retrospective subanalysis, 360 patients were included based on the following criteria: nodal involvement (pN+), known RT treatment and known radiation fields. RESULTS The majority had pT1b/pT2 tumors (n=299; 83.1%). In 76.7%, R0 resection was achieved. 57/360 (15.8%) N+ patients were treated with adjuvant RT to the groins/pelvis and 146/360 (40.5%) received adjuvant RT to the vulva and groins/pelvis. 157/360 (43.6%) patients did not receive any adjuvant RT. HPV status was available in 162/360 patients (45.0%), 75/162 tumors were HPV+(46.3%), 87/162 (53.7%) HPV-. During a median follow-up of 17.2 months, recurrence at the vulva only occurred in 25.5% of patients without adjuvant RT, in 22.8% of patients with adjuvant RT to groins/pelvis and in 15.8% of patients with adjuvant RT to the vulva and groins/pelvis respectively. The risk reducing effect of local RT was independent of the resection margin status. 50% disease free survival time (50% DFST) indicated a stronger impact of adjuvant RT to the vulva in HPV+ compared to HPV- patients (50% DFST 20.7 months vs. 17.8 months). CONCLUSION Adjuvant RT to the vulva was associated with a lower risk for local recurrence in N+ VSCC independent of the resection margin status. This observation was more pronounced in patients with HPV+ tumors in comparison to HPV- tumors.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the recent advances regarding molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), a rare but continuously rising disease. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical research focuses on deescalation especially with regard to surgery. Recurrence patterns have been analyzed to further understand the course of disease showing a persistent risk for local recurrence even several years after the initial diagnosis. The main focuses of recent translational research are the distinct molecular mechanisms behind human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and -negative VSCC. Next-generation sequencing analyses have highlighted TP53 as central driver mutation in HPV-negative disease. For HPV-independent VSCC, an impaired prognosis with limited disease-free and overall survival has been reported from a large multicenter analysis. Although no targeted agent has been granted approval, the impact of immunotherapy in vulvar cancer has been investigated in basket trials. Therapy response, however, was limited. SUMMARY Further clinical research should focus on deciphering the molecular mechanisms of tumor development further. Detailed understanding of the molecular landscape will help to find novel therapy targets, fight the disease in advanced stages and thereby improve the quality of life for affected patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
p53 and p16 expression profiles in vulvar cancer: a translational analysis by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Chemo and Radiotherapy in Epithelial Vulvar Cancer study group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224:595.e1-595.e11. [PMID: 33453182 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are 2 known pathways for tumorigenesis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma-a human papillomavirus-dependent pathway characterized by p16 overexpression and a human papillomavirus-independent pathway linked to lichen sclerosus, characterized by TP53 mutation. A correlation of human papillomavirus dependency with a favorable prognosis has been proposed. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to further understand the role of human papillomavirus and p53 status in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and characterize its clinical relevance. STUDY DESIGN The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaecological Oncology Chemo and Radiotherapy in Epithelial Vulvar Cancer-1 study is a retrospective cohort study of 1618 patients with primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique stage ≥1B treated at 29 gynecologic cancer centers in Germany between 1998 and 2008. For this translational substudy, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was collected. A tissue microarray was constructed (n=652 samples); p16 and p53 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Human papillomavirus status and subtype were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS p16 immunohistochemistry was positive in 166 of 550 tumors (30.2%); p53 staining in 187 of 597 tumors (31.3%). Only tumors with available information regarding p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry and without p53 silent expression pattern were further analyzed (n=411); 3 groups were defined: p53+ (n=163), p16+/p53- (n=132), and p16-/p53- (n=116). Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 85.6% of p16+/p53- tumors; human papillomavirus-16 was the most common subtype (86.3%). Patients with p16+ tumors were younger (64 vs 72 years for p53+, respectively, 69 years for p16-/p53- tumors; P<.0001) and showed lower rates of lymph-node involvement (28.0% vs 42.3% for p53+, respectively, 30.2% for p16-/p53- tumors; P=.050). Notably, 2-year-disease-free and overall survival rates were significantly different among the groups: disease-free survival, 47.1% (p53+), 60.2% (p16-/p53-), and 63.9% (p16+/p53-) (P<.001); overall survival, 70.4% (p53+), 75.4% (p16-/p53-), and 82.5% (p16+/p53-) (P=.002). In multivariate analysis, the p16+/p53- phenotype showed a consistently improved prognosis compared with the other groups (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.99; P=.042). CONCLUSION p16 overexpression is associated with an improved prognosis whereas p53 positivity is linked to an adverse outcome. Our data support the hypothesis of a clinically relevant third subgroup of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with a p53-/p16- phenotype showing an intermediate prognosis that needs to be further characterized.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zach D, Åvall-Lundqvist E, Falconer H, Hellman K, Johansson H, Flöter Rådestad A. Patterns of recurrence and survival in vulvar cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:748-754. [PMID: 33736857 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the patterns of recurrence and how these patterns are associated with survival in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. We also explored the survival impact of surgical groin staging (SGS). METHODS Nationwide population-based study including women diagnosed with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2015 and registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer. Cumulative incidence rates (CIR), recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan Meier estimates. The impact of SGS on RFS and OS was analyzed by proportional hazards models. RESULTS 489 eligible women were included. Median follow-up time was 64 months. The overall recurrence rate was 22.3%. Site of recurrence: local in 61.0%, groin in 30.0%, distant in 9.0%. The CIR for local recurrences increased with time (5.9% at 2-years, 14.7% at 5-years) while the rate of groin and distant recurrences was nearly steady (5.5% to 6.3% and 1.5% to 1.7%, respectively). Median 2-year and 4-year OS post-recurrence was 57.8% and 37.4% for local, 17.2%, 10.3% for groin and 0% for distant recurrences, respectively. SGS was omitted in 23.7% of surgically treated women with FIGO stages IB-II and significantly associated with worse RFS (Hazard ratio, HR, 1.9; 95%CI, 1.0-3.5; p = 0.04) and OS (HR 2.0; 95%CI, 1.1-3.8; p = 0.04) after adjustment for age, FIGO stage, tumor size, resection margins and performance status. CONCLUSION The cumulative incidence of isolated vulvar recurrence was low but for those affected the prognosis was poor. Surgical groin staging is a crucial part of primary treatment and should not be omitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Zach
- Dept of Gynecological Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist
- Dept of Oncology and Dept of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Dept of Gynecological Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Hellman
- Dept of Gynecological Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Dept of Gynecological Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Angelique Flöter Rådestad
- Dept of Hereditary Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gu HF, Liu GC, Chen JP, Li JY, Zhang XK, Liu ZM, Tu H. Proposal for modified inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy derived from investigation of anatomic distribution of sentinel and metastatic nodes in vulvar cancer. J Surg Oncol 2020; 123:660-666. [PMID: 33155291 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a less invasive inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) approach for vulvar cancer based on the investigation of the anatomic distribution of sentinel and metastatic nodes. METHODS Patients with vulvar cancer treated by surgery between 1995 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A seven-field method was adopted to assign the anatomic locations for lymph nodes removed via IFL or sentinel node biopsy. Only patients with nodal metastasis or sentinel nodes were included. RESULTS A total of 102 patients with eligible data were analyzed. Nodal metastasis was confirmed in 118 groins undergoing IFL; sentinel node detection succeeded in 46 groins. The medial-inguinal field had the highest rate of nodal metastasis involvement (59.3%, 70/118) and sentinel nodes present (73.9%, 34/46). The inferior-femoral field was involved only in one groin with quadruple-field metastases. The lateral-inguinal field was not involved in any groin. Neither the lateral-inguinal nor the inferior-femoral field presented sentinel nodes. CONCLUSION The lateral-inguinal and inferior-femoral fields of the groins have a low risk of developing nodal metastasis. Therefore, a modified IFL preserving these fields can be established to reduce surgical morbidity without sacrificing its therapeutic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Feng Gu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Chen Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie-Ping Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Yun Li
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Ke Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Min Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hua Tu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hellman K, Holmberg E, Bjurberg M, Borgfeldt C, Dahm-Kähler P, Flöter Rådestad A, Hjerpe E, Högberg T, Marcickiewicz J, Rosenberg P, Stålberg K, Tholander B, Kjølhede P, Åvall-Lundqvist E. Primary treatment and relative survival by stage and age in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based SweGCG study. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:663-671. [PMID: 32988623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vulvar cancer affects mainly elderly women and with an ageing population the incidence has increased. We explored the primary treatment patterns and relative survival of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) by stage and age-group. METHODS A population-based nationwide study on women diagnosed with VSCC between 2012 and 2016 and registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC). Main outcome was 5-year relative survival (RS) estimated by the Pohar Perme method. The relative risk of excess mortality (EMRR) between different groups was analyzed by Poisson regression. The age-standardized relative survival (AS-RS) was estimated for the total cohort. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 41 months. The study population included 657 women; 33% were ≥ 80 years old. FIGO stage I was most common (55%). Primary surgery was performed in 96% stage I, 65% stage II, 80% stage III and 28% stage IV. In women ≥80 years, exploration of the groins and chemoradiotherapy was less often performed. They also received lower mean doses of radiation than younger women. The 5-year AS-RS was 74%. 5-year RS was 84% for stage I, 60% for stage II, 54% for stage III and 35% for stage IV. The EMRR for women ≥80 years compared with women <60 years was 4.3 (p < 0.001); 4.9 (p < 0.001) for stages I-II and 3.5(p = 0.007) for stage III. CONCLUSIONS In general, primary treatment of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in Sweden adhered to guidelines. Areas of improvement include treatment for stage II and for the very old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Hellman
- Department of Gynecologic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Region Västra Götaland, Regional Cancer Centre West, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maria Bjurberg
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Christer Borgfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Angelique Flöter Rådestad
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabet Hjerpe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Visby Hospital, SE-62155 Visby, Sweden
| | - Thomas Högberg
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
| | - Janusz Marcickiewicz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Halland Hospital, SE-43281 Varberg, Sweden
| | - Per Rosenberg
- Department of Oncology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-58185 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Karin Stålberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bengt Tholander
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Preben Kjølhede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-58185 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist
- Department of Oncology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-58185 Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|