Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy

Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers´ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers´application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers´applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Lower extremity lymphedema in patients with gynecologic cancer: Validation of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) in German language and investigation of lymphedema real-world treatment

PURPOSE

The Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) is an established patient-reported outcome measure for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) in gynecologic oncology. We aimed to validate the GCLQ in German language (GCLQ-GER) for lymphedema detection in German-speaking patients and also investigated real-world patterns of lymphedema treatment.

METHODS

The GCLQ was translated from English into German in accordance with the standards of a professional translation process. Subsequently, the questionnaire was administered in a prospective observational study including 102 patients who had undergone lymph node dissection (LND) within gynecologic cancer surgery. Various test quality criteria were calculated for the GCLQ-GER. As gold standard of testing methods, patients were clinically evaluated for LEL, and limb volume measurements were taken. Further data for lymphedema treatment were collected in patients with lymphedema diagnosis.

RESULTS

Patients with LEL had increased GCLQ-GER total scores (mean 7.27) compared to patients without LEL (mean 1.81), p < 0.001. High diagnostic accuracy was indicated by the large area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.874 (95% CI 0.802-0.946). Based on sensitivity and specificity values ≥ 79.0%, the GCLQ total score ≥ 4 was determined as the optimal cut-off value to identify LEL. Excellent internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach's alpha of 0.876. The clinical examination revealed a LEL prevalence of 48.0% (n = 49), and 85.7% (n = 42) of these patients received treatment.

CONCLUSION

The GCLQ-GER is a valid and feasible patient-reported outcome measure for lymphedema detection in German-speaking gynecologic cancer survivors. Its clinical introduction could improve secondary prevention of lymphedema and real-world treatment.

Physical activity and lower extremity lymphedema among endometrial cancer survivors: A population-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this cross-sectional study were to describe the prevalence of self-reported lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) by different physical activity (PA) levels and to examine if higher levels of PA are associated with lower odds of self-reported LEL among endometrial cancer survivors.

METHODS

Women treated for assumed early-stage endometrial cancer between 2006 and 2021 were invited to complete the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire (LELSQ) and the Physical Activity Frequency, Intensity, and Duration (PAFID) questionnaire. Responses of PAFID were converted into metabolic equivalent of task minutes per week (MET-min/week), and participants were categorized into different PA levels: meeting (≥500 MET-min/week) versus not meeting PA guidelines; low active (<500 MET-min/week), active (500-1000 MET-min/week), and high active (>1000 MET-min/week); and PA quartiles.

RESULTS

Among 1077 included, the prevalence of LEL was 48 %, 32 %, and 32 % among the low active, active, and high active survivors, respectively. Compared to the low active, the active survivors had 40 % lower odds of LEL (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.44-0.81), but no further reduction was observed among the high active survivors (OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.47-1.06). According to PA quartiles, higher PA levels were associated with lower odds of LEL, but not in a linear dose-response way.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that regular PA according to the current PA guidelines is associated with decreased the odds of self-reported LEL among endometrial cancer survivors; however, causality of association needs to be verified in a longitudinal setting.

Incidence and predictors of lower extremity lymphedema after postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess the rate and predictors of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) after radiotherapy (RT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) ± pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients (pts) treated with adjuvant or salvage RT after RP ± PLND and a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. LEL was defined as a volume difference ≥ 10% between limbs evaluated using circumferential measurements with a flexible non-stretch tape. The following predictors were investigated at logistic regression: age (continuous); body mass index (BMI, continuous); exercise level (low vs. medium/high); smoking (yes vs. no); cigarette pack/year (continuous); hypertension (yes ns no); vascular comorbidity (yes vs. no); diabetes (yes vs. no); PLND (yes vs. no); number of examined nodes (continuous); whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) (yes vs. no); time between RP and RT (continuous); planning target volume (PTV) volume (continuous); PTV/BMI (continuous). Statistical significance was claimed for p < 0.05.

RESULTS

101 pts were examined. The median time from surgery to RT was 36.1 months (mths) (IQR: 15.0-68.3), the median time from RT to the date of study examination was 51.1 months (IQR: 36.8-65.3). 14 pts developed LEL (13.9%), 3 pts (2.9%) before RT, 11 pts (10.8%) after RT. The median time from RT to LEL was 4 mths (IQR: 0.5-17.3). At multivariable analysis (MVA) diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 32.8, p = 0.02), time between surgery and RT (OR = 0.966, p = 0.039) and exercise (OR = 0.03, p = 0.002) were independently correlated to LEL. The number of examined nodes was highly correlated to LEL at univariate analysis (OR = 1.066, p = 0.025) but was not confirmed at MVA (p = 0.719). Interestingly, the distribution of the examined nodes was statistically different between pts with low (median N = 12) vs. medium/high (N = 5) exercise (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically detectable LEL involves a minority of pts after RT. DM is a predisposing factor, while awaiting RT delivery has a protective effect favoring salvage over adjuvant RT.

Patient-reported lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping in women with low-grade endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node mapping is a minimally invasive surgical staging procedure that allows identification of macro- and micrometastases. The implementation of sentinel lymph node mapping to women with low-grade endometrial cancer allows detection of lymph node metastases and avoids the morbidity of radical pelvic lymphadenectomy. The extent of myometrial invasion is highly predictive of lymph node metastases but is hard to determine precisely preoperatively. The exact rate of lymph node metastases in the large group of women with <50% myometrial invasion is low but unknown. The benefit of detecting metastases in this group should balance the risk of lymphedema. There is limited knowledge of early and late lymphedema and its impact on the quality of life in women with low-grade endometrial cancer following sentinel lymph node mapping.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to investigate the risk of patient-reported lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping in women with low-grade endometrial cancer. In addition, we aimed to evaluate risk factors for lymphedema and the condition-specific quality of life (QoL) among women who reported lymphedema 12 months after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women with presumed stage I low-grade endometrial cancer were included in a national prospective cohort study on sentinel lymph node mapping from March 2017 to February 2022. Women completed a package of validated patient-reported outcome measures before surgery, 3 and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the leg lymphedema domain score from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24). The lymphedema assessment was further supplemented by 7 validated single items from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer item library addressing lymphedema of legs, genitals, and groin. The disease-specific quality of life was assessed using the validated Lymphedema Quality of Life Tool. Scores were linearly transformed to 0 to 100. A change from baseline of 8 points in leg lymphedema sum-score was considered clinically important. Mean difference scores over time with 95% confidence interval were estimated. Multiple linear regression models evaluated baseline predictors associated with the 12 months postoperative lymphedema score, and if early lymphedema predicted lymphedema at 12 months after surgery. Lymphedema condition-specific quality of life was evaluated for women with lymphedema.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine % (486/617) completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and 12 months. The mean difference score of leg lymphedema from baseline to 12 months was 5.0, confidence interval [3.3, 6.8], that is, below the threshold for clinical importance. Baseline leg lymphedema score and body mass index were positively associated with the leg lymphedema score at 12 months. The leg lymphedema score at 3 months was associated with a higher 12-month score. High scores of lymphedema at 12 months were negatively associated with the women's daily activities, appearance, emotional functioning, and global quality of life and increased their subjective symptom burden.

CONCLUSION

Women with low-grade endometrial cancer have a low risk of lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping. Leg swelling at baseline and body mass index predicted more lymphedema at 12 months after surgery. Early lymphedema at 3 months predicted persistent lymphedema. A high leg lymphedema score at 12 months is associated with impairment in several aspects of quality of life.

RELEVANT-C study: patient-reported prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping vs lymphadenectomy after surgery for early-stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of patient-reported lower extremity lymphedema and evaluate patient-reported quality of life after sentinel lymph node mapping vs comprehensive lymphadenectomy with or without sentinel lymph node mapping for the surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

In July 2022, we mailed a survey that included a validated 13-item lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire to patients who underwent lymph node evaluation at the time of primary surgery for the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA1 to IIB cervical cancer between January 1, 2006, and January 31, 2019. We excluded patients diagnosed with lower extremity lymphedema prior to surgery and those who answered ≤6 survey items, and we carried out 2 group comparisons: sentinel lymph node mapping vs lymphadenectomy with or without sentinel lymph node mapping, and patients with lower extremity lymphedema vs patients without.

RESULTS

Of 459 potential participants, 90 (20%) responded to the survey, all of which were evaluable (37 sentinel lymph nodes; 53 lymphadenectomies ± sentinel lymph nodes). Self-reported lower extremity lymphedema prevalence was 10.8% (4/37) in the sentinel lymph node mapping group and 43.4% (23/53) in the lymphadenectomy with or without sentinel lymph node mapping group (OR 6.32, 95% CI 2.14 to 23.5, p = .002). Histologic subtype and number of lymph nodes removed were associated with increased prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema. After adjusting for the histology subtype, lymphadenectomy retained independent association with an increased prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema over sentinel lymph node mapping (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.61 to 18.8, p = .009). Patients with self-reported lower extremity lymphedema had significantly worse quality of life compared to those without self-reported lower extremity lymphedema.

CONCLUSIONS

We found sentinel lymph node mapping to be independently associated with a significantly decreased prevalence of patient-reported lower extremity lymphedema and with improved quality of life in patients undergoing surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer.

Lymph node assessment at the time of robotic hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: A cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).

METHODS

A decision analytic model was created to evaluate the strategies of routine full LND, sentinel lymph node dissection (SNLD), SNLD without advancing to full LND in the event of non-mapping, and full LND based on Mayo Criteria, versus no LND. Patients in the no LND group and those in the SLND group without advancement to full LND in the event of non-mapping who were found to have EC on final pathology and suspicious post-operative imaging underwent full LND. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Outcomes included cost, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), lymphedema, and 12-month post-operative complications. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.

RESULTS

In a theoretical cohort of 1000 women, no LND was the dominate strategy with 960 QALYs and cost $21.94 M. This strategy resulted in 29 peri-operative complications and 11 cases of lymphedema. PSA indicated that LND based on frozen pathology is not CE compared to no LND. When comparing lymph node assessment strategies, SLND without escalation to full LND was the dominate strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to no LND, no strategy of LND was CE. However, if SLND was performed, escalation to full LND in the event of non-mapping resulted in worse CE. With this in mind, it is reasonable to consider either forgoing LND altogether or performing SLND without advancing to full LND to improve costs and reduce complications.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with lymphadenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is increasingly used for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect and cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an SLN algorithm for surgical staging in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma compared with lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We performed a model-based, cost-effectiveness analysis using primary data from a tertiary referral hospital that included 829 patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing surgical staging. We quantified the health and economic outcomes from two time periods, before and after implementation of the SLN algorithm by robotic surgery. Costs were measured directly from the hospital's financial department, while long-term health outcomes were estimated using self-reported lymphedema and health-related quality-of-life among survivors. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate uncertainty.

RESULTS

We projected that the SLN implementation period, predominately reflecting use of robotic SLN, simultaneously improved health outcomes (0.08 incremental quality-adjusted life-years) and lowered costs (US$1051) compared with the prior period involving robotic or open lymphadenectomy. SLN remained more beneficial and less costly across key sensitivity analyses-namely, varying the cost of the robotic platform, surgical equipment, number of yearly robotic procedures, percentage of robotic procedures versus percentage of laparotomies, length of stay, and lymphedema development. After 1000 simulations of the model, SLN implementation provided greater health benefits for lower costs (ie, cost saving) in 89% of simulations.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an SLN algorithm in the staging of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma improved health outcomes for lower costs compared with lymphadenectomy. Cost-effectiveness could further improve by continuing to increase the proportion of robotic procedures.

Laparoscopic treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: benefits of sentinel lymph node mapping and impact on lower extremity lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the lymphatic-specific morbidity (specifically, lower extremity lymphedema) associated with laparoscopic management of early-stage endometrial cancer using the sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm by type of actual nodal assessment.

METHODS

An ambispective study was conducted on consecutive patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic staging according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network SLN algorithm at a single institution from January 2020 to August 2023. Data on patient characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative complications were collected. Lymphedema screening was performed using a validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were analyzed, with a questionnaire response rate of 85.4%. The study population was grouped based on actual surgical staging: hysterectomy+SLN (54.8%), hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (27.2%), and hysterectomy only (18%). The prevalence of lymphedema was significantly lower in the hysterectomy+SLN group compared with the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group (21.4% vs 44.6%, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis showed a threefold increase in the risk of lymphedema for the hysterectomy+systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy group compared with the hysterectomy+SLN group: OR 3.11 (95% CI 1.47 to 6.58). No significant associations were found between lymphedema and other patient or tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of a laparoscopic approach for early-stage endometrial cancer surgery, SLN mapping is associated with a significant reduction in lymphatic complications compared with a systematic lymph node dissection. Our findings provide additional evidence endorsing the adoption of SLN mapping during minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. This technique ensures comparable diagnostic accuracy and also minimizes complications.

Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Concurrent Endometrial Cancer and Risk for Pelvic Sentinel Node Metastases

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Given the risk of a progression, or an undiagnosed endometrial cancer (EC), the treatment of choice is hysterectomy in women with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). The risk of metastatic disease and whether sentinel node (SLN) biopsy should be performed remains unclear. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the overall incidence of concurrent EC and the impact of the diagnostic tool used and the type of endometrial lesion. The secondary aim was to investigate the risk of metastatic SLNs.

METHODS

Between July 2019 and May 2024, 98 consecutive women with EIN deemed suitable for robotic surgery and SLN dissection were included in the study. Ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry were performed on all SLNs.

RESULTS

In total, 47% of women with preoperative EIN had EC on final histology; 13% of these had metastatic SLNs and the overall risk of metastases was 6.3%. Women who obtained their diagnosis by an endometrial biopsy had 65% risk of EC. All women with metastatic SLNs had non-polypoid lesions and five out of six obtained their diagnosis through endometrial biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of SLN metastases was 6.3%, all in women with a general endometrial thickening and/or a diagnosis of EIN by office endometrial biopsy, suggesting that SLN detection should be offered particularly to women with EIN who fulfill these preoperative criteria.

Hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection in the setting of preoperative endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe ≥20 mm: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVES

Routine lymph node assessment in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is institution and surgeon-dependent without clear guidelines. We sought to determine if routine sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and a preoperative ultrasound with endometrial stripe ≥20 mm is cost-effective.

METHODS

A decision model was created to perform two cost-effectiveness analyses: (1) hysterectomy with frozen section versus hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe of 20 mm or greater, and (2) the same options in all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Costs obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and event probabilities and quality of life utility values were obtained through literature review.

RESULTS

In the case of preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20 mm, hysterectomy with SLN dissection cost $2469 more than hysterectomy with frozen section and gained 0.010 quality adjusted life years, or $44,997/quality-adjusted life years gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, SLN dissection remained the favored strategy at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years unless chronic lower extremity lymphedema after full lymphadenectomy had a likelihood <13.1% (base case value 18.1%); otherwise, SLN dissection was favored with individual variation of all other parameters over plausible ranges. When considering all patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, hysterectomy with frozen section was favored, with results most sensitive to variation of lymphedema risk after full lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20mm on ultrasound is cost-effective when compared with hysterectomy with frozen section.

Loss of vimentin expression in preoperative biopsies independently predicts poor prognosis, lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Precise preoperative risk classification of endometrial cancer is crucial for treatment decisions. Existing clinical markers often fail to accurately predict lymph node metastasis and recurrence risk. Loss of vimentin expression has emerged as a potential marker for predicting recurrence in low-risk endometrial cancer patients. We assessed whether vimentin expression in preoperative biopsies predicts poor prognosis and lymph node metastasis in a large multicentre cohort.

METHODS

Vimentin expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 1483 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer across 14 hospitals in Europe. Expression levels of vimentin were analyzed in conjunction with clinical characteristics for predicting disease-specific survival and lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Vimentin loss was significantly associated with aggressive disease and poor survival. Adjusted for clinicopathological variables, vimentin remained independently prognostic with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.68 (95% CI 1.16-2.42, P = 0.006). Vimentin expression remained independently prognostic in endometrioid endometrial cancer- and FIGO staged 1 patient. Interestingly, vimentin loss independently predicted lymph node metastases, with an HR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.13-2.95, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of vimentin in preoperative biopsies serves as an independent predictor of poor prognosis and lymph node metastases. Incorporating vimentin as a clinical marker can improve risk stratification and treatment decisions.

Impact of sentinel node use in lymphedema formation among gynecologic cancer patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The most common surgical procedure associated with lymphedema formation is the regional lymphadenectomy. One of the advantages of sentinel node biopsy is the reduction of the risk of lymphedema formation. The purpose of this review is to collect and analyze the most relevant and recent evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy and its implication on the development of postoperative lymphedema in gynecological cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current evidence of the use of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer to reduce lymphedema is heterogeneous and more data is needed to establish its role.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer is a staging procedure with lower surgical complications, as well as lymphedema formation; while the results of prospective trials evaluating its impact on quality of life are still lacking.Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer minimizes the need for extensive dissection and reduces the incidence of complications associated with overharvesting of lymph nodes such as lymphedema without compromising oncological outcomes.

SUMMARY

The prevalence of lymphedema in gynecological cancer varies based on the surgical treatment or additional therapies applied. Over the past years, one of the most important surgical modifications to decrease lymphedema formation has been implementation of sentinel lymph node technique mainly in vulvar cancer patients.

Lymphovenous anastomosis and complex decongestive therapy for severe deformed lymphedema with recurrent infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity lymphedema is a common complication following treatment for gynecological malignancies. Its incidence rate can reach up to 70%, affecting ~20 million people worldwide. However, specialized treatment centers are scarce, and there is a lack of consensus on treatment approaches. Furthermore, there are even fewer reports on the systematic and effective treatment of severe lymphedema with malformations. Effective management of this condition remains a significant challenge for clinicians.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old woman developed bilateral leg swelling 6 years after receiving treatment for endometrial cancer. Since August 2018, she experienced > 30 episodes of lymphangitis. Upon presentation, she exhibited bilateral leg swelling and deformation, with four large swellings in the posterior thigh that impeded movement, and pain in the limbs. Skin manifestations included lichenoid lesions and features of deep sclerosis. Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy confirmed the diagnosis of lower limb lymphedema. After 6 mo of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and three lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) treatments, the patient lost 49 kg in weight. She also experienced a maximum circumference reduction of 35.2 cm in the left lower limb and 37.5 cm in the right lower limb. The leg pain disappeared, her swelling significantly decreased, and she regained the ability to walk, cycle, and run normally.

CONCLUSION

The combined application of CDT and LVA therapy demonstrates significant positive effects in the treatment of severe, deformed stage III lymphedema.

Lower limb lymphedema after surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Current insights and future directions

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a common complication following surgical staging of endometrial cancer. LEL is a chronic condition associated with significant impact on patient morbidity and quality of life (QoL). This review aimed to report the current evidence in the literature on secondary LEL after surgical staging for endometrial cancer, focusing on the incidence based on different approaches to lymph node staging, diagnosis, risk factors, and the impact on QoL. Due to the absence of a standardized agreement regarding the methodology for evaluating LEL, the documented frequency of occurrence fluctuates across different studies, ranging from 0% to 50%. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to be the primary determinant associated with the emergence of LEL, whereas the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy has notably diminished the occurrence of this lymphatic complication after endometrial cancer staging. LEL is strongly associated with decreased QoL, lower limb function, and negative body image, and has a detrimental impact on cancer-related distress reported by survivors. Standardization of lymphedema assessment is needed, along with cross-cultural adaptation of subjective outcome measures for self-reported LEL. The advent of sentinel lymph node mapping represents the ideal approach for accurate nodal assessment with less short- and long-term morbidity. Further research is needed to definitively assess the prevalence and risk factors of LEL and to identify strategies to improve limb function and QoL in cancer survivors with this chronic condition.

Is it safe to operate selected low-risk endometrial cancer patients in secondary hospitals?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a preoperative screening algorithm in identifying low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients to ensure optimal care.

METHODS

A total of 277 patients with primary EC confirmed through biopsy underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with risk factors for advanced high-risk EC, such as non-endometrioid histology, high-grade differentiation status, deep myometrial invasion, or spread beyond the uterine corpus, were systematically excluded. The remaining preoperatively screened patients with stage IA low-grade endometrioid EC (EEC) (n = 93) underwent surgery in a tertiary hospital. The accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis was evaluated by comparing the findings with the postoperative histopathological results. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using 8-year follow-up data.

RESULTS

Postoperative histopathological analysis revealed that all patients had grade 1-2 EEC localized to the corpus uteri. Only three patients had deep myometrial invasion (stage IB), but they remained disease-free after 6-9 years of follow-up. The median follow-up time for all patients was 8.7 years. The DFS was 7.6 years, and the OS was 8.6 years. Two patients with stage IA grade 1 EEC experienced relapse and, despite treatment, died of EC. No other EC-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening algorithm accurately identified low-risk EC patients without compromising survival. Therefore, the algorithm appears to be feasible for selecting patients for surgery in secondary hospitals.

Preoperative evaluation and a nomogram prediction model for pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to explore the preoperative risk factors of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) in endometrial cancer patients, and construct a nomogram prediction model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected various preoperative clinical characteristics of patients and analyzed their relationship with PLNM. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen for independent risk factors for PLNM of endometrial cancer. A nomogram prediction model was constructed, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were constructed and used to assess discrimination, calibration, and net benefit.

RESULTS

Out of the 276 patients, 74 (26.81%) with postoperative pathological confirmation of PLNM. Multivariate logistic regressive analysis demonstrated that preoperative depth of myometrial invasion (DIM) ≥50% determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (p = 0.003), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) (p = 0.030), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (p = 0.044), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p = 0.025) could serve as independent risk factors for PLNM. A risk factors-based nomogram prediction model was constructed, which showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.841, p < 0.001) and good efficacy (C-index = 0.842) and good calibration (mean absolute error = 0.046). DCA showed that the model can provide clinical benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DIM ≥50% determined by MRI, serum CA 19-9, CA125 and PLR could be utilized to predict PLNM in endometrial cancer patients. This nomogram prediction model can provide preoperative help for evaluation and identification of patients with endometrial cancer, and provide a theoretical basis for clinical intervention.

Identifying safe diagnostic algorithms for sentinel lymph node mapping in high-risk endometrial cancer: The SENTIREC-endo study

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear if sentinel node (SLN) mapping can replace pelvic- (PLD) and paraaortic lymphadenectomy (PALD) for high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). A diagnostically safe surgical algorithm, taking failed mapping cases into account, is not defined. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping algorithms in women with exclusively high-risk EC.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective national diagnostic cohort study of SLN mapping in women with high-risk EC from March 2017 to January 2023. The power calculation was based on the negative predictive value (NPV). Women underwent SLN mapping, PLD and PALD besides removal of suspicious and any FDG/PET-positive lymph nodes. Accuracy analyses were performed for five algorithms.

RESULTS

170/216 included women underwent SLN mapping, PLD and PALD and were included in accuracy analyses. 42/170 (24.7%) had nodal metastasis. The algorithm SLN and PLD in case of failed mapping, demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 74-100) and an NPV of 96% (95% CI 91-100). The sensitivity increased to 93% (95% CI 83-100) and the NPV to 98% (95% CI 94-100) if PLD was combined with removal of any PET-positive lymph nodes. Equivalent results were obtained if PLD and PALD were performed in non-mapping cases; sensitivity 93% (95% CI 83-100) and NPV 98% (95% CI 95-100).

CONCLUSION

SLN-mapping is a safe staging procedure in women with high-risk EC if strictly adhering to a surgical algorithm including removal of any PET-positive lymph nodes independent of location and PLD or PLD and PALD in case of failed mapping.

Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Current evidence and practice

Surgical staging with total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph node assessment is the standard of care for patients with clinical early-stage endometrial cancer. Traditionally, complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LND) was performed to assess for nodal metastases; however, numerous prospective studies have demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy has similar diagnostic accuracy, and is an acceptable alternative to complete LND. This has led to a paradigm shift in endometrial cancer staging.

Comparing Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Indocyanine Green (ICG) Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping with Routine Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Staging of Early-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer

Methods

A retrospective single-centre cohort study of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer undergoing staging surgery (total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with/without pelvic lymph node, and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection (PLND)) with either SLN mapping or routine lymphadenectomy between July 2017 and December 2018.

Results

203 cases with clinical and radiological International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer were included, out of which 109 cases underwent SLN mapping and 94 cases complete lymphadenectomy. Compared to the PLND group, the SLN group had shorter operative time (129 vs. 162 minutes), less blood loss (100 vs. 300 ml), and decreased length of postoperative hospital stay (3 vs. 4 days) (p < 0.001). The lymph node metastases detection rate was 4.6% and 7.4% for the SLN and PLND groups, respectively (p = 0.389). With a median follow-up of 14 months for the SLN and 15 months for the PLND group, the disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable for both at 13 months (p = 0.538 and p = 0.333, respectively).

Conclusion

SLN mapping has been shown to be an acceptable alternative to routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging of early-stage endometrial cancer in our centre, with a comparable lymph node metastases detection rate, DFS and OS, and reduction in operative morbidity. Our results with SLN mapping reproduce comparable outcomes to those reported in the literature.

Does sentinel node mapping impact morbidity and quality of life in endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of post-operative complications and quality of life (QoL) related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A prospective cohort included women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent lymph node staging, grouped as follows: SLN group (sentinel lymph node only) and SLN+LND group (sentinel lymph node biopsy with addition of systematic lymphadenectomy). The patients had at least 12 months of follow-up, and QoL was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cervical Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EORTC-QLQ-Cx24. Lymphedema was also assessed by clinical evaluation and perimetry.

RESULTS

152 patients were included: 113 (74.3%) in the SLN group and 39 (25.7%) in the SLN+LND group. Intra-operative surgical complications occurred in 2 (1.3%) cases, and all belonged to SLN+LND group. Patients undergoing SLN+LND had higher overall complication rates than those undergoing SLN alone (33.3% vs 14.2%; p=0.011), even after adjusting for confound factors (OR=3.45, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.47; p=0.007). The SLN+LND group had longer surgical time (p=0.001) and need for admission to the intensive care unit (p=0.001). Moreover, the incidence of lymphocele was found in eight cases in the SLN+LND group (0 vs 20.5%; p<0.001). There were no differences in lymphedema rate after clinical evaluation and perimetry. However, the lymphedema score was highest when lymphedema was reported by clinical examination at 6 months (30.1 vs 7.8; p<0.001) and at 12 months (36.3 vs 6.0; p<0.001). Regarding the overall assessment of QoL, there was no difference between groups at 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a higher overall rate of complications for the group undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, as well as higher rates of lymphocele and lymphedema according to the symptom score. No difference was found in overall QoL between SLN and SLN+LND groups.

Impact of comorbidities and extent of lymphadenectomy on quality of life in endometrial cancer patients treated with minimally invasive surgery in the era of sentinel lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of quality of life (QoL) among patients who undergo surgical staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for primary endometrial cancer at the Mayo Clinic from October 2013 to June 2016 were mailed a 30-item QoL in Cancer survey (QLQ-C30) and a validated 13-item lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire. Patients who answered <50% of the items or had a pre-operative history of lymphedema were excluded. Multivariable linear regression models were fit to evaluate predictors of QoL using inverse-probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences at the time of the surgery between the lymphadenectomy and SLN groups.

RESULTS

The 221 patients included in the analysis were stratified into two groups: patients who underwent (1) bilateral lymphadenectomy as 'backup' after SLN mapping (lymphadenectomy group; n=101) or (2) SLN removal with or without side-specific lymphadenectomy (SLN group; n=120). On multivariable analysis, obesity, lower extremity lymphedema, and kidney disease had significant (p<0.05) and clinically meaningful negative impacts on global QoL. Declines in average adjusted global QoL scores were marked (19.7 points lower) in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and lower extremity lymphedema compared with non-obese patients without lower extremity lymphedema. In contrast, there was only a 2.9 point difference in the adjusted average global QoL score between the SLN and lymphadenectomy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity lymphedema coupled with obesity predicts poorer QoL in patients who undergo surgical staging for endometrial cancer. In this population, reduction of lower extremity lymphedema by performing SLN instead of lymphadenectomy and earlier targeted interventions may improve patients' QoL. Future research focusing on targeted interventions is needed.

Self-reported lower extremity lymphedema and quality of life after surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma: A population based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) has replaced lymphadenectomy in staging of endometrial carcinoma. The aims of the study were to explore the prevalence of self-reported lymphedema (LEL), identify factors associated with LEL, compare quality of life (QoL) scores using thresholds of clinical importance, and assess correlation between different questionnaires.

METHODS

Women who underwent staging for endometrial carcinoma from 2006 to 2021 were invited to complete the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire (LELSQ), EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-EN24 and EQ-5D-5L.

RESULTS

Of 2156 invited survivors, 61% participated in the study, whereof 1127 were evaluable by LELSQ. The LEL prevalence was 51%, 36% and 40% after lymphadenectomy, SLN and hysterectomy, respectively (p < 0.001). Higher BMI, undergoing lymphadenectomy and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with LEL; odds ratios 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.09), 1.42 (95% CI 1.03-1.97) and 1.43 (95% CI 1.08-1.89) respectively. QoL was lower for women with LEL compared to those without. In women with musculoskeletal complaints the prevalence of LEL was 59%, 50% and 53% after lymphadenectomy, SLN and hysterectomy (p = 0.115), respectively, compared to 39%, 17% and 18% (p < 0.001) in women without musculoskeletal complaints. Spearman's correlation was moderate to strong between the questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

SLN implementation is not associated with increased LEL prevalence compared to hysterectomy alone, but is associated with a significantly lower prevalence compared to lymphadenectomy. LEL is associated with lower QoL. Our study demonstrates moderate to strong correlation between self-reported LEL and QoL scores. Available questionnaires may not distinguish between symptoms caused by LEL and musculoskeletal disease.

Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is performed worldwide in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the occurrence rate of lymphatic complications between SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LND) for EC. The medical records of women who underwent SNB or pelvic LND for EC between September 2012 and April 2022 were assessed. A total of 388 patients were enrolled in the current study. Among them, 201 patients underwent SNB and 187 patients underwent pelvic LND. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) and pelvic lymphocele (PL) were compared between the patients who underwent SNB and those who underwent pelvic LND. The SNB group had a significantly lower occurrence rate of lower-extremity LEL than the pelvic LND group (2.0% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.01). There were no patients who had PL in the SNB group; however, 4 (2.1%) patients in the pelvic LND group had PL. The occurrence rates of lower-extremity LEL and PL were significantly lower in patients who underwent SNB than those who underwent pelvic LND. SNB for EC has a lower risk of lymphatic complications compared to systemic LND.

Sentinel Lymph Node Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients with Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Given the improvement in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer with the inclusion of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), our aim was to evaluate the impact of this minimally invasive and tailored nodal assessment on patients' quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a single-centre, tertiary-level hospital. Patients diagnosed with preoperative early-stage endometrial cancer, who underwent primary surgical treatment between August 2015 and November 2021, were included. The enrolled patients were divided into two cohorts according to the nodal staging performed: the first group underwent only SLNB (SLNB group); the second group underwent pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LND group). We evaluated the overall QoL using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life core 30-item questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and a sexual health questionnaire (EORTC SHQ-C20). The scores were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled in the study: 61 (67.8%) in the SLNB group and 29 (32.2%) in the LND group. In the LND group, 24 (82.7%) patients underwent pelvic and para-aortic LND, while 5 (17.3%) patients underwent pelvic LND. The assessment of the functional scales showed better results for the SLNB group than for the LND group, with a significantly lower impact on physical status (8.2% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.031). In terms of the symptom scales, the SLNB group reported a significantly lower negative impact on sleep quality (4.9% vs. 27.6%, respectively; p < 0.01), pain (1.6% vs. 13.8%, respectively; p = 0.019), and dyspnoea (0% vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.011) than the LND group. The SLNB group had better results for all analysed items regarding sexual QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a surgical technique with SLNB improved patients' overall QoL by increasing their well-being in the functional and symptom spheres.

The SENTIREC-endo study - Risks and benefits of a national adoption of sentinel node mapping in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The SENTIREC-endo study aims to investigate risks and benefits of a national protocolled adoption of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer (EC) with low- (LR) and intermediate-risk (IR) of lymph node metastases.

METHODS

We performed a national multicenter prospective study of SLN-mapping in women with LR and IR EC from March 2017-February 2022. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo. Lymphedema was assessed as a change score and as incidence of swelling and heaviness evaluated by validated patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and three months postoperatively.

RESULTS

627 women were included in the analyses; 458 with LR- and 169 with IR EC. The SLN detection rate was 94.3% (591/627). The overall incidence of lymph node metastases was 9.3% (58/627); 4.4% (20/458) in the LR- and 22.5% (38/169) in the IR group. Ultrastaging identified 62% (36/58) of metastases. The incidence of postoperative complications was 8% (50/627) but only 0.3% (2/627) experienced an intraoperative complication associated with the SLN procedure. The lymphedema change score was below the threshold for clinical importance 4.5/100 CI: (2.9-6.0), and the incidence of swelling and heaviness was low; 5.2% and 5.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SLN mapping in women with LR and IR EC carries a very low risk of early lymphedema and peri- and postoperative complications. The national change in clinical practice contributed to a more correct treatment allocation for both risk groups and thus supports further international implementation of the SLN technique in early stage, low grade EC.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of international data regarding self-reported lower extremity lymphedema and quality of life after surgery for gynecological cancer. Validated questionnaires are emerging, but translated versions are lacking. Cross-cultural adaptation is important to reduce the risk of introducing bias into a study.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and culturally adapt the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire for a Norwegian population.

METHODS

Permission to use the original English versions of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire for translation was obtained. The questionnaires were translated using a procedure based on standard guidelines, including forward translation by native speakers of the target language, synthesis, back translation, and review. Seventeen patients from the Norwegian Radium Hospital gynecological cancer outpatient clinic, all expected to have stable disease, were invited for questionnaire test-retest by completing the same questionnaires twice at 3-4-week intervals. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intra-class correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Twelve patients completed the questionnaires twice. Cronbach's alpha was 0.75 for the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and 0.89 for the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 for the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and 0.91 for the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of these internationally validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaires for survivors of lower extremity lymphedema in gynecological cancer was feasible. The Norwegian translation of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire showed acceptable internal consistency and the test-retest reliability was excellent.

Applications and Safety of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer

Lymph node status is important in predicting the prognosis and guiding adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer. However, previous studies showed that systematic lymphadenectomy conferred no therapeutic values in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer but might lead to substantial morbidity and impact on the quality of life of the patients. The sentinel lymph node is the first lymph node that tumor cells drain to, and sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as an acceptable alternative to full lymphadenectomy in both low-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer. Evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate, sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy. It can also reduce surgical morbidity and improve the detection of lymph node metastases compared with systematic lymphadenectomy. This review summarizes the current techniques of sentinel lymph node mapping, the applications and oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy in low-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer, and the management of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes. We also illustrate a revised sentinel lymph node biopsy algorithm and advocate to repeat the tracer injection and explore the presacral and paraaortic areas if sentinel lymph nodes are not found in the hemipelvis.

Therapeutic Benefit of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Negative Uterine-Confined Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Omission of Adjuvant Therapy

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries. Extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries, and its incidence has been increasing globally with rising obesity rates and longer life expectancy. In endometrial cancer, extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. In this review, I discuss the characteristics of lymph node metastasis, the methods of lymph node assessment, and the therapeutic benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Usefulness and potential pitfalls of pre-operative PET-CT in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing one- and two-step sentinel lymph node mapping: Do negative findings on PET-CT negativity really indicate node negativity?

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the utility of Positron emission tomography-Computed tomography (PET-CT) in the setting of two different sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping techniques; the conventional cervical injection method (one-step) and the two-step method, which involves fundal injection followed by cervical injection.

METHODS

Patients with endometrial cancer undergoing FDG PET-CT followed by laparoscopic or robotic surgical staging with SLN mapping at the Yonsei Cancer Center between July 2014 and April 2021 were stratified into the PET-positive group (with suspected or likely lymph nodes metastasis) and PET-negative group. A chart review was performed for the number of harvested SLNs, patterns of SLN metastases, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 466 patients undergoing one-step (n = 276) and two-step (n = 190) SLN mapping, LN metastasis was identified in 21 of 434 PET-negative and 18 of 32 PET-positive patients. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT for diagnosing lymph node metastasis were 46.2% and 96.7%, respectively. Among PET-positive patients with LN metastasis, anatomical distribution was concordant in 14/18 patients (77.8%). Among PET-negative patients, four (2.3%) had metastatic para-aortic SLNs, including three (1.7%) with isolated para-aortic metastases; metastatic para-aortic SLNs were exclusively found in the two-step group. Among PET-positive patients, para-aortic SLN metastasis was identified in 35.7% of two-step and 16.7% of one-step group. Among the 21 PET false-negative patients, recurrence was seen in four patients (19%) after a median follow-up of 34 months (range: 7-70 months).

CONCLUSIONS

PET-CT served as a useful guide to clinicians with high anatomical concordance rate in patients with LN metastasis. However, despite high specificity, sensitivity was limited. SLN metastasis pattern, especially at the para-aortic level, indicates that the two-step SLN technique might be useful in PET-negative and PET-positive patients.

Evaluating long-term outcomes of three approaches to retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node mapping (SNM) has gained popularity in managing apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Here, we evaluated the long-term survival of three different approaches of nodal assessment.

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional retrospective study evaluating long-term outcomes of EC patients having nodal assessment between 01/01/2006 and 12/31/2016. In order to reduce possible confounding factors, we applied a propensity-matched algorithm.

RESULTS

Overall, 940 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the study, of which 174 (18.5%), 187 (19.9%), and 579 (61.6%) underwent SNM, SNM followed by backup lymphadenectomy (LND) and LND alone, respectively. Applying a propensity score matching algorithm (1:1:2) we selected 500 patients, including 125 SNM, 125 SNM/backup LND, and 250 LND. Baseline characteristics of the study population were similar between groups. The prevalence of nodal disease was 14%, 16%, and 12% in patients having SNM, SNM/backup LND and LND, respectively. Overall, 19 (7.6%) patients were diagnosed with low volume nodal disease. The survival analysis comparing the three techniques did not show statistical differences in terms of disease-free (p = 0.750) and overall survival (p = 0.899). Similarly, the type of nodal assessment did not impact survival outcomes after stratification based on uterine risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlighted that SNM provides similar long-term oncologic outcomes than LND.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer by Retroperitoneal Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study

Objective

The primary objective was to determine the intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by retroperitoneal transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). The secondary objective was to assess the feasibility of this surgical technique.

Methods

This was a descriptive study realized in a non-university hospital in Switzerland. Seven patients with endometrial cancer or endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia underwent surgical staging with SLNB by retroperitoneal vNOTES using an indocyanine green-based near-infrared fluorescence imaging technique (October 2021-February 2022).

Results

The median operative time was 113 (81-211) minutes. The median estimated blood loss was 20 (20-400) mL. The overall bilateral detection rate was 100% (7/7). Upon histopathological examination, 5 patients presented an endometrial adenocarcinoma, and we found endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia in 2 cases. We successfully completed all procedures without significant intraoperative complications, but 1 case required conversion to conventional laparoscopy. The median postoperative stay was 2 (2-4) days, and we observed no postoperative complications during this period. We observed 1 case of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and an asymptomatic vaginal vault hematoma in the same patient.

Conclusions

Our preliminary study suggests that retroperitoneal vNOTES could be a feasible, safe, and valuable approach to perform SLNB in endometrial cancer. However, strong evidence of its feasibility, the effective benefits, and the long-term oncological outcomes is needed before expanding the use of vNOTES in endometrial cancer outside study settings.

The frequency and persistence of lymphedema diagnosis and self-reported symptoms over 5 years in patients with endometrial carcinoma

•

Numbness, aching, and poor physical function were commonly reported symptoms in endometrial cancer patients.

•

Lymphedema symptoms that develop soon after diagnosis of endometrial cancer can persist for at least 5 years.

•

Lymphedema symptoms could develop up to 7 years after initial diagnosis or treatment for endometrial cancer.

A potentially debilitating sequela of diagnosis or treatment for endometrial cancer islower limb lymphedema (LLL), which can have significant impacts on quality of life. Theobjective of this study was to determine the frequency of LLL symptoms in uterinecancer survivors over a 5-year study period. An IRB-approved prospective study of quality of life of endometrial cancer patients whounderwent surgical intervention was undertaken. The Gynecologic CancerLymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) was used to survey patients in 2011 and again in2016 to evaluate for symptoms of LLL.205 patients initially answered the survey, and 75 patients completed the follow upsurvey as well, with no differences in demographics between the cohorts. 90.7% ofpatients underwent lymph node dissection. Patients commonly reported symptoms ofnumbness (66.83%), aching (54.2%), and poor physical function (47.8%). On initialsurvey, 14.7% (n = 11) of patients met criteria for LLL by GCLQ criteria, with 8 patientsreporting improvement in symptoms and 3 reporting persistent diagnosis at follow up. At follow up survey, 12.0% (n = 9) patients meeting criteria five years later, with 6patients newly meeting criteria. The most persistent symptoms were poor physicalfunction (70.6%), numbness (72.5%), general swelling (55.6%), aching (64.1%), andlimb-related swelling (60%).While the rate of LLL was similar to previous reports, there were a number of newdiagnoses of LLL at interval follow up distant from surgery, up to 7 years later.Symptoms of LLL also persisted for many years after diagnosis.

The prevalence of undiagnosed postoperative lower limb lymphedema among gynecological oncology patients

OBJECTIVE

Lower limb lymphedema (LLL) is a common postoperative complication among gynecological oncology patients following lymph node resection. In the absence of a screening strategy, LLL is frequently diagnosed only through patient's self-reported symptoms. This study investigated the prevalence of undiagnosed postoperative LLL among gynecological oncology patients and identified the associated risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey at a tertiary gynecological oncology center. Women with gynecological malignancies who underwent lymph node (inguinal/pelvic/para-aortic) resection between 2010 and 2017 were eligible. The Gynecological Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) was used and those with a score of ≥4 were referred to a lymphedema specialist for clinical confirmation.

RESULTS

Among 376 eligible women, postoperative LLL was already diagnosed in 45/376 (12%) women. In the remaining women, 117/331 (35.3%) completed the GCLQ, of which 67/117 (57.3%) scored ≥4. Fifty-five women (55/67, 82.1%) were assessed by a lymphedema specialist and eight cases of postoperative LLL were confirmed. In the 12/67 who declined a clinical assessment, they reported no evidence of LLL. The prevalence of undiagnosed postoperative LLL in our study was 8/117 (6.8%, 95% C.I. 2.3-11.4). On univariate analysis, older women were more likely to have undiagnosed postoperative LLL.

CONCLUSIONS

Undiagnosed postoperative LLL is not uncommon among gynecological oncology patients, especially in older patients. No vulvar cancer patient had undiagnosed LLL. Increased awareness and improved strategies for lymphedema screening are required after lymph node surgery in gynecological oncology.

The Association Between the Number of Retrieved Pelvic Lymph Nodes and Ipsilateral Lower Limb Lymphedema in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer

PURPOSE

While the risk of lower limb lymphedema (LLE) after radical surgery for gynecologic malignancies is multifactorial, the limited assessment of lymph nodes (LNs), such as sentinel LN biopsy, has been incorporated into a standard procedure. We assessed the relationship between the number of LNs retrieved from the hemipelvis and the incidence of ipsilateral LLE (iLLE).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 103 women with gynecologic cancer who had LNs removed with minimally invasive surgery between January 2014 and December 2018. For early detection of LLE, the patients were followed up by a lymphedema specialist who complied with the International Society of Lymphedema criteria. Potential risk factors for LLE were collected, and the risk factors were further investigated according to the number of LNs removed in a side-specific manner.

RESULTS

LLE was diagnosed in 32 (31.1%) patients, and most of them were diagnosed with unilateral (n = 22) LLE rather than bilateral (n = 10). The number of pelvic LNs removed (p = 0.018), no lymphatic mapping (p = 0.034), and radiation (p = 0.020) were associated with the development of one or both LLEs. A side-specific analysis revealed that the incidence of iLLE increased significantly when four or more LNs were removed from the hemipelvis compared with three or fewer LNs (22.9% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of pelvic LNs retrieved was associated with the incidence of LLE in patients with early gynecologic cancer. We identified the cutoff number per hemipelvis through side-specific analysis that could minimize the risk of iLLE. Further studies are needed to validate our results.

Biomarkers Associated with Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma

Simple Summary

In endometrial cancer, lymph node invasion assessed through surgical lymphadenectomy or sentinel lymph node biopsy is a determinant factor for the prognosis and planification of adjuvant treatment. Those surgical procedures are associated with short- and long-term complications. Recent advances in molecular characterization of endometrial cancer have provided important insights into the biological nature of tumors but have not improved the pre-operative prediction of LND. This study is a description of the transcriptomic landscape associated with lymph node metastases in endometroid endometrial carcinomas. A 54-genes expression signature was generated at analysis of the primary tumor. Differential gene expression was found between patients with and without lymph node metastasis, with an 87% accuracy. Our findings provide a basis for the development of a gene expression-based signature that can be used to pre-operatively select patients for whom surgical assessment of lymph node status is of little value, and, consequently, an unfavorable risk–benefit balance.

Abstract

Introduction. Lymph node metastasis is determinant in the prognosis and treatment of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) but the risk–benefit balance of surgical lymph node staging remains controversial. Objective. Describe the pathways associated with lymph node metastases in EEC detected by whole RNA sequencing. Methods. RNA-sequencing was performed on a retrospective series of 30 non-metastatic EEC. N+ and N− patients were matched for tumoral size, tumoral grade and myometrial invasion. Results. Twenty-eight EECs were analyzable (16 N+ and 12 N−). Bioinformatics Unsupervised analysis revealed three patterns of expression, enriched in N+, mix of N+/N− and enriched in N−, respectively. The cluster with only N+ patient overexpressed extra cellular matrix, epithelial to mesenchymal and smooth muscle contraction pathways with respect to the N− profile. Differential expression analysis between N+ and N− was used to generate a 54-genes signature with an 87% accuracy. Conclusion. RNA-expression analysis provides a basis to develop a gene expression-based signature that could pre-operatively predict lymph node invasion.

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Grade Endometrial Cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is becoming an acceptable alternative to full lymphadenectomy for evaluating lymphatic spread in clinical stage I endometrial cancer (EC). While the assessment of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes is part of the surgical staging of EC, there is a long-standing debate over the therapeutic value of full lymphadenectomy in this setting. Although lymphadenectomy offers critical information on lymphatic spread and prognosis, most patients will not derive oncologic benefit from this procedure as the majority of patients do not have lymph node involvement. SLN mapping offers prognostic information while simultaneously avoiding the morbidity associated with an extensive and often unnecessary lymphadenectomy. A key factor in the decision making when planning for EC surgery is the histologic subtype. Since the risk of lymphatic spread is less than 5% in low-grade EC, these patients might not benefit from lymph node assessment. Nonetheless, in high-grade EC, the risk for lymph node metastases is much higher (20–30%); therefore, it is crucial to determine the spread of disease both for determining prognosis and for tailoring the appropriate adjuvant treatment. Studies on the accuracy of SLN mapping in high-grade EC have shown a detection rate of over 90%. The available evidence supports adopting the SLN approach as an accurate method for surgical staging. However, there is a paucity of prospective data on the long-term oncologic outcome for patients undergoing SLN mapping in high-grade EC, and more trials are warranted to answer this question.

Impact of lymphadenectomy on short- and long-term complications in patients with endometrial cancer

Introduction

Early endometrial cancer is primarily treated surgically via hysterectomy, adenectomy and, depending on tumor stage and subtype, lymphadenectomy. Systematic lymph node dissection is known to cause surgical complications. The aim of the present study was to investigate morbidity and mortality rates associated with lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in a routine clinical setting.

Methods

We collected data from 232 patients who were operated for endometrial carcinoma between 2006 and 2018 at the University of Lubeck, Germany. Surgical complications were viewed in relation to surgical risk factors. Additionally, a questionnaire concerning long-term lymphatic complications and survival was completed. Survival was compared between patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (group I) and those who did not (group II).

Results

Patients in group I needed revision surgery significantly more often due to postoperative complications (such as lymphoceles) compared to those in group II (p = 0.01). The results indicate more serious complications in patients who underwent a systematic lymphadenectomy and in those with lymph node metastases. 15% of patients who underwent a systematic lymphadenectomy had lymph node metastases. Recurrences occurred in 12.5% of cases and were significantly more frequent in patients who had undergone a lymphadenectomy, even if the lymph nodes were negative (p = 0.02). A comparison of survival data during the follow-up period revealed no significant difference. The study highlighted the need for a better preoperative risk stratification and the avoidance of lymphadenectomy for surgical staging alone.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06396-5.

Longitudinal effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node staging on patient-reported outcomes in endometrial cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with endometrial cancer with localized disease are effectively treated and survive for a long time. The primary treatment is hysterectomy, to which surgical staging procedures may be added to assess the need for adjuvant therapy. Longitudinal data on patient-reported outcomes comparing different levels of primary treatment are lacking, especially when adjuvant radiotherapy is omitted.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the impact of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy on patient-reported symptoms, function, and quality of life. We hypothesized that these treatment modalities would substantially affect patient-reported outcomes at follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

We prospectively included patients with endometrial cancer enrolled in the ongoing MoMaTEC2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543710). Patients were asked to complete the patient-reported outcome questionnaires European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EN24 preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Functional domains and symptoms were analyzed for the whole cohort and by treatment received. To assess the effect of the individual treatment modifications, we used mixed regression models.

RESULTS

Baseline data were available for 448 patients. Of these patients, 339 and 219 had reached 1-year follow-up and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Treatment included hysterectomy (plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) alone (n=177), hysterectomy and lymph node staging without adjuvant therapy (n=133), or adjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of staging procedure (n=138). Overall, patients reported improved global health status and quality of life (+9 units; P<.001), increased emotional and social functioning, and increased sexual interest and activity (P<.001 for all) from baseline to year 1, and these outcomes remained stable at year 2. Means of functional scales and quality of life were similar to age- and sex-weighted reference cohorts. Mean tingling and numbness and lymphedema increased after treatment. The group who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a larger mean reduction in physical functioning (-6 vs +2; P=.002) at year 1, more neuropathy (+30 vs +5; P<.001; year 1) at years 1 and 2, and more lymphedema at year 1 (+11 vs +2; P=.007) than the group treated with hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy only. In patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, patient-reported outcomes were similar regardless of lymph node staging procedures. Adjuvant chemotherapy independently increased fatigue, lymphedema, and neuropathy in mixed regression models.

CONCLUSION

Patients with endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy reported significantly reduced functioning and more symptoms up to 2 years after treatment. For patients treated by surgery alone, surgical staging did not seem to affect the quality of life or symptoms to a measurable degree at follow-up. Therefore, subjecting patients to lymph node removal to tailor adjuvant therapy seems justified from the patient's viewpoint; however, efforts should increase to find alternatives to traditional chemotherapy.

Overall survival after surgical staging by lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a national cancer database study

OBJECTIVE

Substituting lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging purposes in endometrial cancer has raised concerns about incomplete nodal resection and detrimental oncological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between the type of lymph node assessment and overall survival in endometrial cancer accounting for node status and histology.

METHODS

Women with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymph node assessment from January 2012 to December 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, had previous cancer, and whose follow-up was less than 90 days were excluded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 68 614 patients, 64 796 (94.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy, 1777 (2.6%) underwent sentinel node biopsy only, and 2041 (3.0%) underwent both procedures. On multivariable analysis, neither sentinel lymph node biopsy alone nor sentinel node biopsy followed by lymphadenectomy was associated with significantly different overall survival compared with lymphadenectomy alone (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.17, and HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08, respectively). When stratified by lymph node status, sentinel node biopsy alone or followed by lymphadenectomy was not associated with different overall survival, both in patients with negative (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.24, and HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.27, respectively) or positive (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.52, and HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04, respectively) lymph nodes. These findings held true when sentinel node biopsy alone and sentinel node biopsy plus lymphadenectomy groups were merged, and on stratification by histotype (type one vs type 2) or inclusion of only complete lymphadenectomy (at least 10 pelvic nodes and at least one para-aortic node removed). In all analyses, age, Charlson-Deyo score, black race, AJCC pathological T stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, brachytherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival.

DISCUSSION

No difference in overall survival was found in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy alone, sentinel node biopsy followed by lymphadenectomy, or lymphadenectomy alone. This observation remained regardless of node status, histotype, and lymphadenectomy extent.

A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with no retroperitoneal node dissection in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer - ENDO-3: ANZGOG trial 1911/2020

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy is a surgical technique to explore lymph nodes for surgical staging of endometrial cancer, which has replaced full retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. However, the effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy, its value to patients, and potential harms compared with no-node dissection have never been shown in a randomized trial.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

Stage 1 will test recovery from surgery. Stage 2 will compare disease-free survival at 4.5 years between patients randomized to sentinel node biopsy versus no retroperitoneal node dissection.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

The primary hypothesis for stage 1 is that treatment with sentinel node biopsy will not cause detriment to patient outcomes (lymphedema, morbidity, loss of quality of life) and will not increase treatment-related morbidity or health services costs compared with patients treated without a retroperitoneal node dissection at 12 months after surgery. The primary hypothesis for stage 2 is that disease-free survival at 4.5 years after surgery in patients without retroperitoneal node dissection is not inferior to those receiving sentinel node biopsy.

TRIAL DESIGN

This phase III, open-label, two-arm, multistage, randomized non-inferiority trial (ENDO-3) will determine the value of sentinel node biopsy for surgical management of endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer are randomized to receive: (1) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with sentinel node biopsy or (2) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection. In stage 1, 444 patients will be enrolled to demonstrate feasibility and quality of life. If this is demonstrated, we will enroll another 316 patients in stage 2.

MAJOR INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria include women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer; clinical stage 1, who meet the criteria for laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with uterine mesenchymal tumors are excluded.

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS

The endpoint for stage 1 is surgical recovery, with the proportion of patients returning to usual daily activities at 3 months post-surgery as measured with the EQ-5D. Stage 2 is disease-free survival at 4.5 years.

SAMPLE SIZE

760 participants (both stages).

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

Stage 1 commenced in January 2021 and is planned to be completed in December 2024 when 444 participants have completed 12 months' follow-up. Stage 2 will enroll a further 316 participants for a total of 760 patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04073706.

Factors predicting morbidity in surgically-staged high-risk endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors predicting the risk of developing 90-day postoperative complications and lymphatic-specific morbidity in patients undergoing surgical staging for high-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Patients affected by apparent early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer (endometrioid FIGO grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer) undergoing surgical staging between 2007 and 2019. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Martin criteria were applied to improve quality of complications reporting.

RESULTS

Charts of 279 patients were evaluated. Lymphadenectomy, sentinel node mapping (SNM), and SNM followed by back-up lymphadenectomy were performed in 83 (29.7%), 50 (17.9%), and 146 (52.4%) patients, respectively. The former group of patients included 13 patients who had lymphadenectomy after the failure of the SNM technique. Thirteen (4.6%) patients developed severe postoperative events (grade 3 or worse). At multivariate analysis, body mass index (OR: 1.08 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.17)) and open abdominal surgery (OR: 2.27 (95%CI: 1.02, 5.32)) were the two independent factors predictive of surgery-related morbidity. Seven severe lymphatic complications occurred. The adoption of laparoscopic approach (p < 0.001, log-rank test) and SNM (p = 0.038, log-rank test) correlated with a lower risk of developing surgery-related events. Independently, open abdominal surgery was associated with an increased risk of developing lymphatic morbidity (OR: 37.4 (95%CI: 4.38, 319.5); p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The adoption of the laparoscopic approach and SNM technique were associated with lower 90-day complication rates than open surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing staging surgery.

Advances in management of nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma, with an emphasis on the sentinel lymph node technique

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

During the last few years there have been important advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, staging, and therapy. In this article, we discuss updates and controversies in the treatment of nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma (non-EEC), with an emphasis on the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lymph node involvement is an important factor in determining prognosis and guiding adjuvant therapy in endometrial carcinoma. SLN biopsy has emerged as a less morbid alternative to lymphadenectomy in surgical staging, and it has generally gained acceptance in the setting of low-grade endometrial carcinoma; however, its role in the setting of high-grade disease remains a topic of debate. Several prospective studies have demonstrated the accuracy of SLN biopsy in detecting nodal metastasis in high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Retrospective series have compared oncologic outcomes of patients with high-grade disease, surgically staged by SLN biopsy, to those staged with lymphadenectomy, and have reported similar survival outcomes. Prospective data on survival is lacking.

SUMMARY

Currently, there is sufficient data to support the diagnostic accuracy of SLN biopsy in the surgical staging of non-EEC. The retrospective evidence demonstrates similar survival for SLN biopsy versus lymphadenectomy.

Update on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as an alternative staging approach in women with assumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Through image-guided surgery and pathologic ultrastaging, the SLN approach is introducing “precision medicine” to the surgical management of gynecologic cancers, providing a comprehensive evaluation of high-yield lymph nodes. This approach improves the surgeons’ ability to detect small-volume metastatic disease while reducing intraoperative and postoperative morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy. Although the majority of clinicians in Europe and the USA have recognized the value of SLN biopsy in endometrial carcinoma and introduced this as part of clinical practice, there is ongoing debate regarding its role in very low-risk patients as well as in patients at high risk of nodal metastasis. The significance of low-volume metastasis is not fully understood, and there is no consensus in regard to how the presence of isolated tumor cells should guide adjuvant therapy. Standardized protocols for histopathologic evaluation of SLNs are lacking. In this review article we aim to provide a framework for the introduction of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer, give an updated overview of the existing literature, as well as discuss potential controversies and unanswered questions regarding this approach and future directions.

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Endometrial cancer (EC) is known as a common gynecological malignancy. The incidence rate is on the increase annually. Lymph node status plays a crucial role in evaluating the prognosis and selecting adjuvant therapy. Currently, the patients with high-risk (not comply with any of the following: (1) well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, pathological grade G1 or G2; (2) myometrial invasion< 1/2; (3) tumor diameter < 2 cm are commonly recommended for a systematic lymphadenectomy (LAD). However, conventional LAD shows high complication incidence and uncertain survival benefits. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) refers to the first lymph node that is passed by the lymphatic metastasis of the primary malignant tumor through the regional lymphatic drainage pathway and can indicate the involvement of lymph nodes across the drainage area. Mounting evidence has demonstrated a high detection rate (DR), sensitivity, and negative predictive value (NPV) in patients with early-stage lower risk EC using sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) with pathologic ultra-staging. Meanwhile, SLNM did not compromise the patient’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with low operative complications. However, the application of SLNM in early-stage high-risk EC patients remains controversial. As revealed by the recent studies, SLNM may also be feasible, effective, and safe in high-risk patients. This review aims at making a systematic description of the progress made in the application of SLNM in the treatment of EC and the relevant controversies, including the application of SLNM in high-risk patients.