1
|
Vega B, Desai R, Solk P, McKoy JM, Flores AM, Phillips SM, Barber EL. Increasing physical activity among older adults with gynecologic cancers: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:282. [PMID: 38600364 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08483-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of older gynecologic cancer patients' preferences and opinions related to physical activity during chemotherapy, including interventions to promote physical activity. METHODS Gynecologic cancer patients 60 years or older receiving chemotherapy at a single institution within the last 12 months completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview asking about their preferences for physical activity interventions aimed at promoting physical activity while receiving treatment. RESULTS Among the 30 gynecologic cancer patients surveyed and interviewed, a majority agreed with the potential usefulness of a physical activity intervention during chemotherapy (67%) and most reported they would be willing to use an activity tracker during chemotherapy (73%). They expressed a preference for an aerobic activity intervention such as walking, indicated a desire for education from their clinical team on the effects physical activity can have on treatment symptoms, and stated a need for an intervention that could be accessed from anywhere and anytime. Additionally, they emphasized a need for an intervention that considered their treatment symptoms as these were a significant barrier to physical activity while on chemotherapy. CONCLUSION In this study of older gynecologic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, most were open to participating in a virtually accessible and symptom-tailored physical activity intervention to promote physical activity during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Vega
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 250 E Superior Suite 05-138, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Ria Desai
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Payton Solk
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Siobhan M Phillips
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emma L Barber
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 250 E Superior Suite 05-138, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang R, Xu W, Yang S, Hu D, Bai L, Xiang R, Zhao X, Nie Y, Shi QL. Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection, Associated Risk Factors, and Relationship With Cervical Precancerous Lesions in Perimenopausal and Older Women in an Area With High Cervical Cancer Incidence in China. Cureus 2024; 16:e58081. [PMID: 38616979 PMCID: PMC11009475 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study delves into the epidemiology of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection and its link to precancerous lesions among perimenopausal (40-59 years) and elderly (60-65 years) women in a Chinese county with a notably high incidence of cervical cancer. By uniquely focusing on these age groups in underdeveloped regions, the research aims to offer novel strategies for the management and prevention of cervical cancer. It seeks to inform targeted interventions and public health policies that could significantly benefit women at heightened risk for HPV, addressing a critical gap in current prevention efforts in economically disadvantaged communities. Methods This observational study was conducted at the Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning Service Centre in Lueyang County, from September 2021 to January 2022. It assessed 2008 women aged 40-65 for HPV screening, with 342 undergoing further cytological examination. The study evaluated the prevalence of HPV infection across different age groups and risk categories. It utilized a questionnaire to collect participants' basic information, health behaviors, and other relevant data to analyze factors influencing HR-HPV infection. Statistical analyses comprised chi-square tests, trend analysis, logistic regression, and multiple imputation techniques to address missing data. Results The prevalence of HR-HPV infection among women aged 40-65 years in Lueyang County was 18.43%. Older women exhibited a higher incidence of HPV infection, abnormal ThinPrep Cytology Test (TCT) results (Shaanxi Fu'an Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Baoji City, China), and low/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL/HSIL) (P<0.05). The most prevalent HR-HPV genotypes in the overall, perimenopausal, and elderly groups were HPV-52, -53, and -58; HPV-52, -53, and -16; and HPV-58, -52, and -53, respectively. The prevalent HR-HPV genotypes in the abnormal The Bethesda System (TBS) results were HPV-16, -52, -33, -58; -16, -52, -58; and-16, -33, and -52. HPV-16, -18, -33 prevalence increased with increasing lesion severity (P<0.05). In this study, factors affecting HR-HPV in the three age groups were found to be mainly related to sexual behavior and education level, including history of lower genital tract diseases, multiple pregnancies, contraceptive methods without tubal ligation, age at first marriage greater than 18 years, never washing the vulva after sex, abstinence from sex, education level of junior high school or above, and spouse's education level of high school or above. Conclusions These findings suggest that the elevated rate of abnormal TBS in the older age group may be attributed to the higher prevalence of persistent infection-prone HR-HPV genotypes (HPV-58, -52, and-53), multiple infections, and potent oncogenic HR-HPV genotypes (HPV-16 and -33). Additionally, the higher HR-HPV prevalence in older patients may be related to lower education attainment, reduced screening rate, and limited condom usage. Therefore, strategies targeting perimenopausal and older women should prioritize enhancing health awareness, increasing screening rates, and encouraging condom utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoyi Zhang
- Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| | - Wei Xu
- Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| | - Siyuan Yang
- Nursing, School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| | - Dehua Hu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Lueyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaanxi, CHN
| | - Li Bai
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Lueyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaanxi, CHN
| | - Rumei Xiang
- Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| | - Xiaowei Zhao
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Lueyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaanxi, CHN
| | - Yuxian Nie
- Biomedical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| | - Qiu-Ling Shi
- Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kovacs N, Piko P, Juhasz A, Nagy C, Oroszi B, Ungvari Z, Adany R. Comparative analysis of health status and health service utilization patterns among rural and urban elderly populations in Hungary: a study on the challenges of unhealthy aging. GeroScience 2024; 46:2017-2031. [PMID: 37798385 PMCID: PMC10828334 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-023-00926-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The demographic transition poses a significant challenge for health systems, especially in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, where the healthcare needs of aging populations are on the rise. This study aimed to describe and compare the health status and utilization of health services among the elderly residing in urban and rural areas of the most deprived region in Hungary. A comprehensive health survey was conducted in 2022, involving a randomly selected sample of 443 older adults (≥ 65 years) in Northeast Hungary. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, education, financial status, chronic diseases, and activity limitations were used to investigate the association between type of residence and health service use. Among the study participants, 62.3% were female, 38.3% attained primary education, 12.5% reported a bad or very bad financial situation and 52.6% lived in urban areas. Overall, 24% of the elderly rated their health as very good or good (27.8% in urban and 19.7% in rural areas), while 57.8% (52.6% and 63.5% in urban and rural areas) reported limitations in daily activities. Compared to urban residents, rural residents reported lower rates of dentist visits (p = 0.006), specialist visits (p = 0.028), faecal occult blood testing (p < 0.001), colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy (p = 0.014), and breast cancer screening (p = 0.035), and a higher rate of blood pressure measurement (p = 0.042). Multivariable models indicated that urban residence was positively associated with faecal occult blood testing (OR = 2.32, p = 0.014), but negatively associated with blood pressure (OR = 0.42, p = 0.017) and blood glucose measurements (OR = 0.48, p = 0.009). These findings highlight the influence of residence on health service utilization among older adults in Hungary. Further comprehensive studies are needed to better understand the health needs of the elderly population and to develop policies aimed at promoting healthy aging in CEE countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Kovacs
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- ELKH-DE Public Health Research Group, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Piko
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Laboratory for Health Security, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Attila Juhasz
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Laboratory for Health Security, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csilla Nagy
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Laboratory for Health Security, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Beatrix Oroszi
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Laboratory for Health Security, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Ungvari
- Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Neurodegeneration Program, Oklahoma Center for Geroscience and Healthy Brain Aging, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- International Training Program in Geroscience, Doctoral School of Basic and Translational Medicine, Departments of Public Health and Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Roza Adany
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
- ELKH-DE Public Health Research Group, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
- Center for Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Laboratory for Health Security, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coutinho F, Gokhale M, Doran C, Monberg M, Yamada K, Chen L. Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2024; 39:100800. [PMID: 38430610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (HR-LACC). METHODS This retrospective study identified and randomly selected adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. For patients initially treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we estimated real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) among those with persistent disease, real-world time on CCRT, and recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS The cohort included 300 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years. 53.7 % were White and 30.0 % were Black; 52.0 % were premenopausal; 89.3 % had squamous cell histology; 75.3 % had stage III disease, and 92.7 % had no evidence of performance status impairment. Initial treatment included CCRT (N = 229), surgery (N = 28), antineoplastics only (N = 11), and radiation only (N = 5). Twenty-seven patients were untreated. Baseline characteristics for the CCRT-first patients were similar to the overall cohort; their median real-world time on treatment was 1.6 months; 78.2 % received cisplatin for a median of 1.2 months; 28.4 % received antineoplastics after CCRT, and 11.8 % initiated a second antineoplastic therapy. Of the CCRT-first patients, 27/143 with a complete response had subsequent recurrent disease (median rwRFS not reached). 179 patients had persistent disease, among whom median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS was 29.7 (16.9-59.3) months. CONCLUSION In this study of United States-based clinical practices, most HR-LACC patients received CCRT as initial treatment. Many patients developed persistent disease after CCRT indicating a need for improved first treatment and maintenance options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mugdha Gokhale
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Charlotte Doran
- ConcertAI, LLC, 1120 Massachusetts, Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Matthew Monberg
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Karin Yamada
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | - Lei Chen
- Merck & Co., Inc., 126 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 2000, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kucera CW, Chappell NP, Tian C, Richardson MT, Tarney CM, Hamilton CA, Chan JK, Kapp DS, Leath CA, Casablanca Y, Rojas C, Sitler CA, Wenzel L, Klopp A, Jones NL, Rocconi RP, Farley JH, O'Connor TD, Shriver CD, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Phippen NT, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM. Survival disparities in non-Hispanic Black and White cervical cancer patients vary by histology and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:224-235. [PMID: 38340648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated racial disparities in survival by histology in cervical cancer and examined the factors contributing to these disparities. METHODS Non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White (hereafter known as Black and White) patients with stage I-IV cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 in the National Cancer Database were studied. Survival differences were compared using Cox modeling to estimate hazard ratio (HR) or adjusted HR (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The contribution of demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors to the Black vs White differences in survival was estimated after applying propensity score weighting in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC). RESULTS This study included 10,111 Black and 43,252 White patients with cervical cancer. Black patients had worse survival than White cervical cancer patients (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.35-1.45). Survival disparities between Black and White patients varied significantly by histology (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.15-1.24 for SCC; HR = 2.32, 95% CI = 2.12-2.54 for AC, interaction p < 0.0001). After balancing the selected demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors, survival in Black vs. White patients was no longer different in those with SCC (AHR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.06) or AC (AHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.96-1.24). In SCC, the largest contributors to survival disparities were neighborhood income and insurance. In AC, age was the most significant contributor followed by neighborhood income, insurance, and stage. Diagnosis of AC (but not SCC) at ≥65 years old was more common in Black vs. White patients (26% vs. 13%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Histology matters in survival disparities and diagnosis at ≥65 years old between Black and White cervical cancer patients. These disparities were largely explained by modifiable factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calen W Kucera
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole P Chappell
- George Washington Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation / California Pacific Medical Center /Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Christine Rojas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | - Collin A Sitler
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lari Wenzel
- School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center & Research Institute, the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - John H Farley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Timothy D O'Connor
- Institute for Genome Sciences, Department of Medicine and Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, and Program in Health Equity and Population Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ing BI, Scott ME, Lentz SE. Opportunities Missed: Cervix Cancer Screening Failures in Women Aged 65 and Older. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2023; 27:337-342. [PMID: 37467471 DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the screening history and associated outcomes of women diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65. METHODS All patients from 2012 to 2021 diagnosed with squamous, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, or adenosquamous cervical cancer after age 65 in a single managed care organization (MCO) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic, medical, screening, pathologic, follow-up, and treatment data were extracted. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test and logistic regression. Cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 2,175 patients screened, 209 met inclusion criteria. Only 26.3% of patients had appropriate cervical cancer screening and 41% of patients died of their disease. Managed care organization membership duration of more than 5 years positively correlated with proper cervical cancer screening ( p < .001); however, 64% of the long-term members still did not meet criteria to end screening at age 65, with 42.6% of these patients having more than 25 physician visit opportunities to address screening. Increased physician visits correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer ( p = .012). Median cancer-specific survival was significantly better in properly screened patients at 68 vs 30 months, respectively ( p = .03). CONCLUSIONS Most patients diagnosed with cervical cancer after age 65 did not have adequate previous screening, including those who were MCO members for more than 5 years. There were many missed opportunities for screening, despite multiple provider touchpoints. The authors' data suggest that adequate screening confers a survival benefit secondary to earlier stage at diagnosis. Further study in this age group is needed to redefine the criteria to end cervix cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon I Ing
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neumeyer S, Tanaka LF, Liang LA, Klug SJ. Epidemiology of cervical cancer in elderly women: Analysis of incidence, treatment, and survival using German registry data. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17284-17295. [PMID: 37403686 PMCID: PMC10501271 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer (CC) screening is generally recommended until age 65. The incidence of CC could be underestimated, particularly in older women, due to a lack of hysterectomy correction. Furthermore, elderly women (≥65 years) are more often diagnosed with late-stage disease and have worse outcomes than younger patients. This study aims to provide an in-depth overview of CC in Germany. METHODS Incidence rates of CC (ICD-10 C53) were determined using data from the German Centre of Cancer Registry data (ZfKD) of six federal state registries. Incidence was corrected by using hysterectomy prevalence values from a real-world study. The distribution of treatment modalities (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy) was assessed. Relative survival was calculated using the period approach (2011-2015). Survival was stratified by tumor (T) stage and histological type. RESULTS In total, 14,528 CC cases were included, 27.6% of which occurred in elderly women. Cumulative (2001-2015) age-standardized incidence rates were 12.5 per 100,000 women without hysterectomy correction and 15.5 per 100,000 women after hysterectomy correction (+24% relative change). A lower proportion of elderly women were treated, especially in advanced tumor stages. Younger women (20-64 years) had a higher 5-year relative survival compared to elderly women: 76.7% versus 46.9%, respectively. Survival was worse with increasing stage and for glandular histological subgroups, particularly among elderly women. CONCLUSIONS CC incidence in elderly women is underestimated and survival is lower compared to younger women in Germany. Due to the high disease burden in elderly women, screening and treatment strategies need to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Neumeyer
- Chair of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Luana Fiengo Tanaka
- Chair of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Linda A. Liang
- Chair of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Stefanie J. Klug
- Chair of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gu Y, Cheng H, Cang W, Chen L, Yang J, Xiang Y. Comparison of oncological outcomes in elderly early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery or radiotherapy: A real-world retrospective study with propensity score matching. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1019254. [PMID: 36874082 PMCID: PMC9975559 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1019254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the oncological outcomes of radical surgery and radical radiotherapy in elderly (over 65 years) patients with early-stage cervical cancer (IB-IIA). Methods Elderly patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2000 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were divided into the radiotherapy group (RT group) and the operation group (OP group) according to their primary intervention. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the biases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects. Results A total of 116 patients were eligible for the study (47 in the RT group, and 69 in the OP group), and after PSM, 82 patients were suitable for further analysis (37 in the RT group, and 45 in the OP group). In the real-world setting, it was found that compared with radiotherapy, operation was more frequently selected for elderly cervical cancer patients with adenocarcinoma (P < 0.001) and IB1 stage cancer (P < 0.001). The 5-year PFS rates between the RT and OP groups were not significant (82.3% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.659), and the 5-year OS rate of the OP group was significantly better than that in the RT group (100% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.039), especially in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.029) and tumor size of 2~4 cm with G2 differentiation (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (P = 0.659). In the multivariate analysis, compared with operation, radical radiotherapy was an independent risk factor of OS (hazard ratio = 4.970, 95% CI, 1.023~24.140, P = 0.047). No difference was observed in adverse effects between the RT and OP groups (P = 0.154) and in ≥grade 3 adverse effects (P = 0.852). Conclusion The study found that surgery was more frequently selected for elderly cervical cancer patients with adenocarcinoma and IB1 stage cancer in the real-world setting. After PSM to balance the biases, it showed that compared with radiotherapy, surgery could improve the OS of elderly early-stage cervical cancer patients and was an independent protective factor of OS in elderly early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Gu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongyan Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Cang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lihua Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junjun Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Centre for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang F, Song X. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:465-474. [PMID: 36256872 PMCID: PMC9624383 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and open abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) have been used for cervical cancer treatment. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of LRH and ARH in the treatment of cervical cancer to provide reliable evidence to the clinical cervical cancer treatment. METHODS Two investigators independently searched PubMed and other databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LRH and ARH for cervical cancer treatment up to May 31, 2022. The risk of bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane library was used for quality assessment. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs with a total of 1700 patients with cervical cancer were finally included. Meta-analyses indicated that compared with ARH, LRH reduced the intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD]=-58.08; 95% CI, -70.91, -45.24), the time to first passage of flatus (MD=-14.50; 95% CI, -16.55, -12.44) (all P <0.05), and increase the number of lymph nodes removed (MD=3.47; 95% CI, 0.51, 6.43; P =0.02). There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery (MD=27.62; 95% CI, -6.26, 61.49), intraoperative complications (odd ratio [OR]=1.10; 95% CI, 0.17, 7.32), postoperative complications (OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.33, 1.86), relapse rate (OR=1.45; 95% CI, 0.56, 3.74), and survival rate (OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.52, 1.08) between LRH group and ARH group (all P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS LRH has more advantages over ARH in the treatment of cervical cancer. Still, the long-term effects and safety of LRH and ARH need more high-quality, large-sample RCTs to be further verified.
Collapse
|