Once- versus twice-daily dosing of eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1: The Phase 3, randomized, double-blind EDGE trial

Long-term effectiveness of eliglustat treatment: A real-world analysis from the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is known for phenotypic heterogeneity and varied natural history. Registrational clinical trials enrolled narrowly defined phenotypes, but greater diversity is encountered in clinical practice. We report real-world outcomes with long-term eliglustat treatment in adults with GD1 in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Among 5985 GD1 patients in the Registry as of January 6, 2023, 872 started eliglustat at ≥18 years old; of these, 469 met inclusion criteria. We compared clinical parameters at eliglustat initiation (i.e., baseline) and follow-up in treatment-naïve patients and used linear mixed models to estimate annual change from baseline in parameters among patients who switched to eliglustat after ≥1 year on enzyme replacement therapy. Over 4 years of follow-up in non-splenectomized treatment-naïve patients, hemoglobin and platelet count increased, liver and spleen volume decreased, and total lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score decreased slightly. Among non-splenectomized switch patients, on average, hemoglobin decreased -0.030 (95% CI: -0.053, -0.008) g/dL (N = 272) and platelet count increased 2.229 (95% CI: 0.751, 3.706) × 103/mm3 (N = 262) annually up to 10 years; liver volume decreased (-0.009 [95% CI: -0.015, -0.003] MN) (N = 102) and spleen volume remained stable (-0.070 [95% CI: -0.150, 0.010] MN) (N = 106) annually up to 7 years; and total lumbar spine BMD Z-score increased 0.041 (95% CI: 0.015, 0.066) (N = 183) annually up to 8 years. Among splenectomized switch patients, clinical parameters were stable over time. These long-term, real-world outcomes are consistent with the eliglustat clinical trials and emerging real-world experience across the GD phenotypic spectrum.

Patient reported outcomes of patients with Gaucher disease type 1 treated with eliglustat in real-world settings: The ELIPRO study

INTRODUCTION

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is a rare genetic lysosomal storage disorder. Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adult patients with GD1. The aim of the ELIPRO (ELIglustat Patient Reported Outcomes) study was to assess real-world outcomes of eliglustat treatment for over 1 year in patients with GD1, with a focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including treatment adherence.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional, prospective, multicentric study. Patients were stratified according to their previous time on eliglustat: >6 months (Group1) and ≤ 6 months (Group2). The primary endpoint was adherence to eliglustat, measured by the eight-items Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8; scale of 0-8) at 6 months in Group2. Secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL) measured by patient input using the European Quality of Life five-dimensional three-level [EQ-5D-3L] questionnaire, fatigue and pain measured by numeric rating scale [NRS; on a scale of 0-10], the evaluation of patient satisfaction level regarding eliglustat treatment measured by Likert scale [scale of 0-7] and treatment adherence at 12 months in both groups. The study also evaluated the safety and effectiveness of eliglustat in the adult GD1 population.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with GD1 (approximatively 52% male, mean age: 46.6 ± 13.9 years) were analyzed: 29 in Group1 and 31 in Group2. GD1 was mostly of mild severity (90%) and 95% of patients had extensive CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype. Fifty-seven patients had previously received treatment for GD1 (91% enzyme replacement therapy) and 15% were splenectomized. Groups1 and 2 were not necessarily matching for all characteristics. At 6 months, 58% of Group2 patients showed medium adherence (6 < MMAS-8 < 7.75) while 21% showed high adherence (MMAS-8: 8) (mean MMAS-8: 6.7 ± 1.0); similar results were obtained in Group1 (50% showed high compliance, 35% showed medium compliance; mean MMAS-8: 6.8 ± 1.4). The mean MMAS-8 for Group1 and Group2 were 7.1 ± 1.2 (vs 7.0 ± 1.0 at baseline) and 6.5 ± 1.0, respectively, at 12 months. At 12 months, the mean NRS scores in Group1 and Group2 were 72.0 ± 18.5 and 77.3 ± 13.7 for QoL (vs. 71.7 ± 18.4 and 80.2 ± 12.4, respectively at baseline), 4.8 ± 2.6 and 3.6 ± 2.7 for fatigue (vs. 4.6 ± 2.7 and 3.6 ± 2.6, respectively at baseline) and 3.3 ± 2.7 and 2.3 ± 2.3 for pain (vs. 3.3 ± 2.7 and 2.0 ± 2.4, respectively at baseline). GD1 assessments (biological, clinical and imaging parameters) remained stable during 12 months in both groups. At the end of the study, majority (97.4%) of patients were satisfied with their treatment with eliglustat (satisfaction score over 5 out of 7). Sixty-six percent of patients (n = 41) experienced mostly mild adverse events (AE) (including four study withdrawals), of whom 27.4% (n = 17) of patients experienced eliglustat-related AEs. Treatment adherence remained stable during 12 months in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Eliglustat treatment compliance was good and sustained, along with overall health state, fatigue and pain levels, which was consistent with overall patients' clinical status. Eliglustat was well tolerated, and had a good safety profile, aligned with a good patient satisfaction. Our study should encourage greater use of PROs for evaluation of impact of the GD treatment on patient's symptoms and well-being.

Long-Term Evaluation of Biomarkers in the Czech Cohort of Gaucher Patients

A personalized treatment decision for Gaucher disease (GD) patients should be based on relevant markers that are specific to GD, play a direct role in GD pathophysiology, exhibit low genetic variation, reflect the therapy, and can be used for all patients. Thirty-four GD patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or substrate reduction therapy (SRT) were analyzed for platelet count, chitotriosidase, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity in plasma samples, and quantitative measurement of Lyso-Gb1 was performed in dried blood spots. In our ERT and SRT study cohorts, plasma lyso-GL1 correlated significantly with chito-triosidase (ERT: r = 0.55, p < 0.001; SRT: r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and TRAP (ERT: r = 0.34, p < 0.001; SRT: r = 0.88, p < 0.001), irrespective of treatment method. A platelet count increase was associated with a Lyso-Gb1 decrease in both treatment groups (ERT: p = 0.021; SRT: p = 0.028). The association of Lyso-Gb1 with evaluated markers was stronger in the SRT cohort. Our results indicate that ERT and SRT in combination or in a switch manner could offer the potential of individual drug effectiveness for particular GD symptoms. Combination of the key biomarker of GD, Lyso-Gb1, with other biomarkers can offer improved response assessment to long-term therapy.

Anderson-Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: an update on epidemiology, diagnostic approach, management and monitoring strategies

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficient activity of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase. While AFD is recognized as a progressive multi-system disorder, infiltrative cardiomyopathy causing a number of cardiovascular manifestations is recognized as an important complication of this disease. AFD affects both men and women, although the clinical presentation typically varies by sex, with men presenting at a younger age with more neurologic and renal phenotype and women developing a later onset variant with more cardiovascular manifestations. AFD is an important cause of increased myocardial wall thickness, and advances in imaging, in particular cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and T1 mapping techniques, have improved the ability to identify this disease non-invasively. Diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of low alpha-galactosidase activity and identification of a mutation in the GLA gene. Enzyme replacement therapy remains the mainstay of disease modifying therapy, with two formulations currently approved. In addition, newer treatments such as oral chaperone therapy are now available for select patients, with a number of other investigational therapies in development. The availability of these therapies has significantly improved outcomes for AFD patients. Improved survival and the availability of multiple agents has presented new clinical dilemmas regarding disease monitoring and surveillance using clinical, imaging and laboratory biomarkers, in addition to improved approaches to managing cardiovascular risk factors and AFD complications. This review will provide an update on clinical recognition and diagnostic approaches including differentiation from other causes of increased ventricular wall thickness, in addition to modern strategies for management and follow-up.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Longitudinal Studies on Drug Treatments for Gaucher Disease

OBJECTIVE

Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare disorder linked to the absence/deficiency of glucocerebrosidase. GD can be treated by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and substrate reduction therapy (SRT). The aim of this systematic review (SR) is to assess the effectiveness of drugs used for GD treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus, in April 2021. The search strategies encompassed the name of the disease and of the drug treatments. Manual search was also conducted.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Observational and interventional longitudinal studies evaluating ERT and SRT for GD were included. Single mean meta-analyses were conducted for each drug using R.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The initial search retrieved 2246 articles after duplicates were removed. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 68 reports were included. The studies evaluated imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, taliglucerase alfa, miglustat, and eliglustat. The results showed that ERT is effective as a treatment in both naïve and experienced patients. Miglustat did not significantly improve blood outcomes in naïve patients and resulted in a decrease in the platelet levels of experienced patients. Eliglustat was mainly assessed for experienced patients and resulted in stable outcome values.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This extensive SR confirms the effectiveness of GD treatments in short- and long-term follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results were favorable for all ERTs and for eliglustat. Based on the assessed evidence, miglustat did not achieved expressive results. However, all evidence should be interpreted considering its limitations and does not replace well-conducted randomized trials.

Long-term effects of eliglustat on skeletal manifestations in clinical trials of patients with Gaucher disease type 1

PURPOSE

Most patients with Gaucher disease have progressive and often disabling skeletal manifestations. We examined the long-term effect of eliglustat treatment on bone outcomes in clinical trials in adults with Gaucher disease type 1.

METHODS

Data from 4 completed phase 2 and 3 trials were evaluated in treatment-naïve patients or patients switching to eliglustat from enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

RESULTS

Overall, 319 of 393 (81%) eliglustat-treated patients remained in their trials until completion or commercial eliglustat became available. Mean eliglustat treatment duration ranged from 3.3 to 6.5 years. In treatment-naïve patients and ERT-switch patients, frequency and severity of bone pain decreased during eliglustat treatment. Mean lumbar spine T-scores shifted from abnormal to normal in treatment-naïve patients and remained in the healthy reference range or improved modestly in ERT-switch patients. Mean total bone marrow burden score shifted from marked-to-severe to moderate in treatment-naïve patients and remained moderate in ERT-switch patients. MIP-1β (marker of active bone disease) was elevated at baseline and decreased to the healthy reference range in treatment-naïve patients and remained in the healthy reference range among ERT-switch patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm the long-term efficacy of eliglustat on skeletal complications of Gaucher disease in treatment-naïve and ERT-switch patients.

Suicidal attempt with eliglustat overdose

Eliglustat is an orphan medicine used for long-term treatment of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) in adults. GD1 is a genetic condition, in which glucosylceramide builds up in the body, typically in liver, spleen, and bone. Clinical signs and symptoms of the disease are anemia, tiredness, easy bruising, hepatosplenomegaly, bone pain, and fractures. Eliglustat works by blocking glucosylceramide synthase (substrate reduction therapy). This medicine is subject to additional safety monitoring by regulatory authorities in the European Union. Scientific literature on eliglustat overdose is not available. We herein describe successful treatment of a suicidal attempt with massive eliglustat overdose. A 29-year-old female with GD1, a poor metabolizer of cytochrome P450 2D6 on a recommended daily dose of 84 mg of eliglustat, had taken 94 capsules of eliglustat (84 mg per capsule). One hour after ingestion of almost 8 g of eliglustat, the patient suffered from somnolence, severe bradycardia (37 bpm), and hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 70 mm Hg). After intravenous administration of atropine (1 mg) and cafedrine/theoadrenaline (100 mg/5 mg) by the called emergency physician, the patient resolved gradually. She remained 24 h with stable hemodynamics at a nearby intensive care unit. During continuous ECG monitoring, increased frequency of supraventricular ectopic activity and a first-degree atrioventricular block were observed. To our knowledge, this is the first case report on a suicidal attempt with eliglustat.

Recommendations for oral treatment for adult patients with type 1 Gaucher disease

This work is a review of the scientific evidence on the oral treatment of adult patients with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with a clinical guideline format according to the Agree II regulations. It describes the main differences between the two oral treatments currently available for treating this disease (miglustat and eliglustat). This review reminds us that the criteria for starting oral treatment in patients with GD1 must be assessed individually. Although miglustat and eliglustat are both glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) enzyme inhibitors, they have different mechanisms of action and pharmacological properties and should never be considered equivalent. Miglustat is indicated in patients with non-severe GD1 who cannot receive other first-line treatments, while eliglustat is indicated as first-line treatment for patients with GD1 of any severity without the need for prior stabilization with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). It is important to emphasize that in order to start treatment with eliglustat, we must know the CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype and its association with drugs metabolized through the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 cytochromes-or alternatively those that use P-Glycoprotein must be evaluated on an individual basis. During pregnancy, the use of eliglustat should be avoided; only ERT can be used. Unlike miglustat, whose adverse effects have limited its use, eliglustat has not only demonstrated similar efficacy to ERT but has also been shown to improve the quality of life of patients with GD1.

Long-term eliglustat treatment of Gaucher patients over up to 10 years in Vienna

Gaucher disease has been the first lysosomal storage disorder for which an enzyme replacement therapy has been approved in the 1990s and was the first to receive approval for a first-line substrate reduction therapy in 2015. Eliglustat treatment has been started in Austria in patients recruited to a clinical trial, followed by its long-term extension and prescription treatment overall covering up to 10 years. In this case series the experience of treating Gaucher patients with eliglustat in Vienna is summarized. Patients were either switched from enzyme replacement therapy or were therapy naïve. Significant improvements were shown in hematological (thrombocytes, hemoglobin) and visceral (spleen volume) manifestations as well as in biomarkers (chitotriosidase, glucosylsphingosine [lyso-GL1], angiotensin converting enzyme) in a routine setting in a therapy-naïve patient. Stability was found in switch patients with slight improvement in bone density. Eliglustat was generally very well tolerated. Patient selection and regular monitoring is required to ensure effective and safe use.

Clinical outcomes after 4.5 years of eliglustat therapy for Gaucher disease type 1: Phase 3 ENGAGE trial final results

Eliglustat, an oral substrate reduction therapy, is approved for eligible adults with Gaucher disease type 1. In the Phase 3 ENGAGE trial of previously untreated adults with Gaucher disease type 1, eliglustat‐treated patients had statistically significant improvements in organ volumes and hematologic parameters compared with placebo in the 9‐month primary analysis. We report final outcomes by time on eliglustat among all patients who participated in the ENGAGE trial and extension. No patient deteriorated clinically or withdrew due to adverse events; 39/40 patients entered the open‐label extension period and 34/40 (85%) remained in the trial until completion or switching to commercial eliglustat after its approval (2.3–6 years). Clinically meaningful improvements in Gaucher disease manifestations were seen in all patients concomitant with reductions in pathological lipid substrate levels (glucosylceramide and glucosylsphingosine). Among patients with 4.5 years of eliglustat exposure, mean spleen volume decreased by 66% (from 17.1 to 5.8 multiples of normal [MN], n = 13), mean liver volume decreased by 23% (from 1.5 to 1.1 MN, n = 13), mean hemoglobin increased 1.4 g/dl (from 11.9 to 13.4 g/dl, n = 12), mean platelet count increased by 87% (from 67.6 to 122.6 × 10⁹/L, n = 12), median chitotriosidase decreased by 82% (from 13 394 to 2312 nmol/h/ml, n = 11), median glucosylceramide decreased by 79% (from 11.5 to 2.4 μg/ml, n = 11), median glucosylsphingosine decreased by 84% (from 518.5 to 72.1 ng/ml, n = 10), and mean spine T‐score increased from −1.07 (osteopenia) to −0.53 (normal) (n = 9). The magnitude of improvement in Gaucher disease manifestations and biomarkers over time was similar among the full trial cohort. Eliglustat was well‐tolerated and led to clinically significant improvements in previously untreated patients with Gaucher disease type 1 during 4.5 years of treatment.

Pregnancy outcome in women with Gaucher disease type 1 who had unplanned pregnancies during eliglustat clinical trials

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is an inherited lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficient enzymatic activity of acid β-glucosidase, resulting in accumulation of its substrate glucosylceramide, leading to debilitating visceral, hematologic, and skeletal manifestations. Women with GD1 are at increased risk for complications during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Treatment with enzyme replacement therapy is generally recommended before and during pregnancy to reduce risks. Eliglustat, an oral substrate-reduction therapy, is a first-line treatment for adults with GD1 adults who have extensive, intermediate, or poor CYP2D6-metabolizer phenotypes (>90% of patients). We report on pregnancy outcomes among women in eliglustat trials who had unplanned pregnancies and female partners of men in the trials. In four phase 2 and 3 eliglustat trials of 393 adults with GD1, women of childbearing potential were required to use contraception, have monthly pregnancy tests, and discontinue eliglustat promptly if pregnant. In phase 2 and 3 trials, 18 women had 19 pregnancies, resulting in 14 healthy infants from 13 pregnancies (one set of twins), three elective terminations, one ectopic pregnancy, one spontaneous abortion, and one in utero death. Median estimated eliglustat exposure duration during pregnancy was 38 days. In phase 1 trials (non-GD1 subjects), one woman had a spontaneous abortion. Partners of 16 eliglustat-treated men with GD1 had 18 pregnancies, all resulting in healthy infants. Eliglustat is not approved during pregnancy due to limited data. Guidelines for clinicians and patients with GD that address use of eliglustat in women of childbearing potential are needed.

Real-world effectiveness of eliglustat in treatment-naïve and switch patients enrolled in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry

Eliglustat is a first‐line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) with extensive, intermediate, or poor CYP2D6‐metabolizer phenotypes (90% of patients). We report real‐world outcomes after 2 years of eliglustat therapy in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry (NCT00358943). As of January 2019, baseline and 2‐year data (±1 year) were available for 231 eliglustat‐treated GD1 patients: 19 treatment‐naïve (zero splenectomized) and 212 ERT patients who switched to eliglustat (36 splenectomized). Most patients (89%) were from the United States, where eliglustat was first approved. In treatment‐naïve patients, mean hemoglobin increased from 12.4 to 13.4 g/dL (P = .004, n = 18), mean platelet count increased from 113 to 156 × 10⁹/L (P < .001, n = 17); mean spleen volume decreased from 7.4 to 3.5 multiples of normal (MN) (P = .02, n = 7); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 7), and median spine Z‐score was unchanged (−1.3 to −1.2, n = 6). In non‐splenectomized switch patients, mean hemoglobin remained stable/non‐anemic (n = 167); mean platelet count remained stable/normal (n = 165); mean spleen volume decreased from 3.3 to 2.8 MN (P < .001, n = 64); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 63), and median lumbar spine Z‐score improved from −0.7 to −0.4 (P = .014, n = 68). In splenectomized switch patients, mean hemoglobin remained stable/non‐anemic (n = 31); mean platelet count increased from 297 to 324 × 10⁹/L (non‐significant, n = 29); mean liver volume remained normal (n = 13); median spine Z‐score improved from −0.8 to −0.6 (non‐significant, n = 11). Median chitotriosidase decreased in all groups (P < .01 for all). These real‐world results are consistent with eliglustat clinical trial results demonstrating long‐term benefit in treatment‐naïve patients and stability in ERT switch patients.

Effect of eliglustat on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, metoprolol, and oral contraceptives and absorption of eliglustat when coadministered with acid-reducing agents

Eliglustat is an oral substrate reduction therapy indicated for patients with Gaucher disease type 1. Based on in vitro data, clinical trials were conducted to assess the potential for drug-drug interactions between eliglustat and digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate), metoprolol (sensitive CYP2D6 substrate), a combined oral contraceptive (CYP3A substrate), and acid-reducing agents. Healthy subjects were enrolled in four Phase 1 clinical studies to evaluate the effect of eliglustat on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of digoxin (N = 28), metoprolol (N = 14), and a combined oral contraceptive (N = 30) and the effect of acid-reducing agents on eliglustat pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability (N = 24). Coadministration resulted in increased exposure to digoxin (1.49-fold) and metoprolol (2-fold) with eliglustat, negligible effects on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics with eliglustat, and a negligible effect of acid-reducing agents on eliglustat pharmacokinetics. Across all studies, eliglustat was well-tolerated. One serious adverse event (spontaneous abortion) and one discontinuation due to an adverse event (urinary tract infection) were reported, both during the acid-reducing agents study. When eliglustat is coadministered with medications that are P-glycoprotein or CYP2D6 substrates, lower doses of these concomitant medications may be required. Eliglustat may be coadministered with oral contraceptives and acid-reducing agents without dose modifications for either drug.

Effects of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and rifampin on the metabolism of eliglustat, an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1

Eliglustat is an oral glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor indicated for the long-term treatment of adults with Gaucher disease type 1 and CYP2D6 extensive, intermediate, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Eliglustat is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4 and is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Three studies evaluated the effects of paroxetine (strong CYP2D6 inhibitor), ketoconazole (strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitor), and rifampin (strong CYP3A4/P-gp inducer; OATP inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered eliglustat in healthy adults. An 8.9-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and paroxetine is attributed to inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of eliglustat by paroxetine. A 4.3-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and ketoconazole is attributed to inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and/or P-gp-mediated transport of eliglustat by ketoconazole. Co-administration of eliglustat with oral doses of rifampin reduced eliglustat exposure by >85% due to induction of CYP3A4/P-gp by rifampin, while a single intravenous dose of rifampin had no effect on eliglustat, confirming that eliglustat is not an OATP substrate. Depending on CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype, co-administration of eliglustat with CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A inhibitors or CYP3A inducers may alter eliglustat exposure, warrant dosage adjustment or use with caution, or be contraindicated.

•

Co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and paroxetine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) increased eliglustat exposure.

•

Co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and ketoconazole (inhibitor of CYP3A and P-gp) increased eliglustat exposure.

•

Co-administration of eliglustat with oral rifampin (inducer of CYP3A and intestinal P-gp) reduced eliglustat exposure.

•

A single intravenous dose of rifampin had no effect on eliglustat exposure.

•

Eliglustat label contains dose adjustments/contraindications for co-administration with CYP2D6/3A inhibitors or inducers.

Impact of hepatic and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eliglustat therapy for Gaucher disease type 1

Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) who have extensive (EM), intermediate (IM), or poor (PM) CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes. It was initially not recommended in GD1 patients with hepatic or renal impairment due to insufficient data. Two Phase 1 studies (NCT02536937/NCT02536911) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on pharmacokinetics and tolerability following a single 84-mg dose of eliglustat. Compared to matched healthy EM subjects (n = 7 for both studies), geometric means for eliglustat maximum concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC) were not substantially different in EMs with mild hepatic impairment (n = 6), higher in EMs with moderate hepatic impairment (n = 7), and similar in EMs with severe renal impairment (n = 7). Higher exposures of eliglustat at steady-state were predicted using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in EMs with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function after repeated 84-mg eliglustat doses. Higher exposures of eliglustat were also predicted in EMs with mild hepatic impairment after coadministration with a CYP2D6 or CYP3A inhibitor with repeated doses. Based on these results, the eliglustat drug label was revised for patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Drug-Drug Interactions Of Amiodarone And Quinidine On The Pharmacokinetics Of Eliglustat In Rats

Background

Eliglustat, a new oral substrate-reduction therapy, was recently approved as a first-line therapy for Gaucher's disease type 1 (GD1) patients.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate a simple UPLC-MS/MS method for the measurement of plasma-eliglustat concentration and to investigate the effects of amiodarone and quinidine on eliglustat metabolism in rats.

Methods

Eighteen rats were randomly divided into three groups (n=6): control (0.5% CMC-Na, group A), amiodarone (60 mg/kg, group B), and quinidine (100 mg/kg, group C). Thirty minutes later, 10 mg/kg eliglustat was orally administered to each rat and concentrations of eliglustat in the rats determined by our UPLC-MS/MS method.

Results

Amiodarone and quinidine increased the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0→_t, AUC_0→∞, and C_max) of eliglustat significantly and decreased clearance obviously.

Conclusion

Amiodarone and quinidine can elevate eliglustat exposure and have an inhibitory effect on eliglustat metabolism. Clearly, appropriate pharmacological studies of eliglustat in patients treated with amiodarone or quinidine should be done in future.

Long-term adverse event profile from four completed trials of oral eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1

Background

Eliglustat is a first-line oral treatment for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who have an extensive, intermediate or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (> 90% of patients). Whereas enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease has been widely used for more than two decades, eliglustat has only been in commercial use since 2014. Clinicians and patients want to better understand which adverse events are most commonly associated with eliglustat, as well as their severity, frequency, and duration.

Methods

This pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events combines data from four completed eliglustat clinical trials involving 393 Gaucher disease type 1 patients. It represents 1400 patient-years of eliglustat exposure and a mean treatment duration of 3.6 years (maximum: 9.3 years).

Results

Eighty-one percent of patients remained in their respective trial until commercial availability of eliglustat (US patients only) or until trial completion. Nine patients (2.3%) withdrew from their respective trial due to one or more adverse events reported as eliglustat treatment-related; all but one of these events were mild or moderate. Overall, 97% of adverse events were mild or moderate and 86% were reported by the investigator as unrelated to eliglustat treatment. The overall rate of adverse events decreased over time and did not increase with increasing eliglustat dose. We evaluated frequency, duration, and severity of 14 adverse event terms reported at least once as treatment-related in 2% or more of all patients: dyspepsia (5.9%), headache (5.3%), abdominal pain upper (5.1%), dizziness (5.1%), diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (4.6%), arthralgia (3.6%), constipation (3.3%), abdominal pain (2.8%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (2.8%), fatigue (2.8%), palpitations (2.8%), abdominal distension (2.5%), and gastritis (2.3%). For abdominal pain upper, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache events, median duration was less than 14 days. All 14 adverse event terms, except for arthralgia and headache, were reported only once per patient in more than 70% of patients experiencing the event.

Conclusions

This final pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events reinforces the favorable safety profile of eliglustat. The majority of the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and occurred only once per patient.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1085-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Outcomes after 8 years of eliglustat therapy for Gaucher disease type 1: Final results from the Phase 2 trial

Eliglustat is a first‐line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) and poor, intermediate or extensive CYP2D6‐metabolizer phenotypes (>90% of patients). We report the final results of a Phase 2 trial and extension (NCT00358150) in previously untreated adult GD1 patients who had splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia and/or anemia and received 50 or 100 mg eliglustat tartrate (equivalent to 42 or 84 mg eliglustat) twice daily for 8 years. In total, 19 of 26 patients completed the trial. After 8 years of eliglustat, mean spleen and liver volumes decreased by 69% and 34%, respectively. Mean hemoglobin concentration and platelet count increased by 2.2 g/dL and 113%, respectively. All patients met at least 3 of 4 therapeutic goals established for patients on long‐term enzyme replacement therapy. Mean final values for patients with severe splenomegaly (n = 6), moderate‐to‐severe anemia (n = 6), or severe thrombocytopenia (n = 8) were similar to patients with milder disease at baseline and within long‐term therapeutic goal thresholds. Biomarker median percent changes from baseline were ‐91% for chitotriosidase, ‐87% for CCL18, ‐92% for glucosylsphingosine, and ‐80% for plasma glucosylceramide. Mean lumbar spine T‐score increased by 0.96, moving from the osteopenic to the normal range. Mean quality‐of‐life scores, mostly below normal at baseline, moved into ranges seen in healthy adults. Eliglustat was well‐tolerated; 98% of adverse events were mild or moderate and 94% were considered unrelated to treatment. Clinically meaningful improvements in all parameters continued or were maintained over 8 years, with the largest margins of improvement seen in the most severely affected patients.

Dose-Finding Studies Among Orphan Drugs Approved in the EU: A Retrospective Analysis

In the development process for new drugs, dose‐finding studies are of major importance. Absence of these studies may lead to failed phase 3 trials and delayed marketing authorization. In our study we investigated to what extent dose‐finding studies are performed in the case of orphan drugs for metabolic and oncologic indications. We identified all orphan drugs that were authorized until August 1, 2017. European Public Assessment Reports were used to extract the final dose used in the summary of product characteristics, involvement of healthy volunteers, study type, end points used, number of patients, number of doses, studies in special populations, and dose used for phase 3 studies. Each drug was checked for major objections and dose changes postmarketing. We included 49 orphan drugs, of which 28 were indicated for metabolic disorders and 21 for oncologic indications. Dose‐finding studies were performed in 32 orphan drugs, and studies in healthy volunteers in 26. The absence of dose‐finding studies was mostly due to the rarity of the disease. In this case the dose was determined based on factors such as animal studies or clinical experience. Dose‐related major objections were raised for 9 orphan drugs. Postmarketing dose‐finding studies were conducted in 18 orphan drugs, but dose changes were applied in only 2 drugs. In conclusion, dose‐finding studies in the case of metabolic and oncologic orphan drugs were conducted in the development programs of two thirds of orphan drugs. Dose‐finding studies performed postmarketing suggest that registered doses are not always optimal. It is thus important to perform more robust dose‐finding studies both pre‐ and postmarketing.