1
|
Zarrillo TA, Stoner KA, Ascher JS. Biodiversity of Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Connecticut (USA). Zootaxa 2025; 5586:1-138. [PMID: 40174048 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5586.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/04/2025]
Abstract
In response to calls for national and regional updated inventories of bee species, we present a county-level checklist for 385 confirmed bee (Apoidea: Anthophila) species for Connecticut, USA, highlighting rare and regionally declining species, species that have specific habitat and/or host requirements, and species whose taxonomy and distribution we wish to clarify. We have compiled a comprehensive, digitized database of historic and current bee records from Connecticut to inform this checklist, which includes specimen records from museums, recent collections, and community science observations from iNaturalist.com. All images of bees from Connecticut on iNaturalist (18,471 observations) have been fully vetted by one or more of the authors, which is unprecedented for a state project. We summarize historical bee research in Connecticut and provide current information regarding the distribution of bee species, changes in status, phenology, habitat usage, and floral associations within the state. At least 43 of 385 species represented in collections or literature have not been detected in Connecticut since the year 2000. These and other species of conservation concern are discussed with reference to a quantitative assessment of changes in range within the state. In addition, we have calculated and report state-level ranks for 124 bee species in Connecticut. We corroborate regional loss of species including Coelioxys funerarius Smith and Holcopasites illinoiensis (Robertson) and clarify and extend the distribution of numerous bee species in the Northeastern United States. Furthermore, we discuss morphospecies, excluded species, and species expected for Connecticut. We also validate synonymies reported previously online based on an unpublished manuscript by Roy Snelling for the following species: Nomada depressa Cresson (= N. hoodiana Cockerell; = N. carinicauda Cockerell; = N. media Mitchell); Nomada obliterata Cresson (= N. decepta Mitchell); Nomada vicina Cresson (= N. beulahensis Cockerell; = N. vicina stevensi Swenk). In addition, we recognize three new synonyms of Nomada xanthura Cockerell (= N. ochlerata Mitchell; = N. detrita Mitchell; = N. mendica Mitchell) and report the first Nomada townesi Mitchell from outside of Maryland. In addition to N. townesi, the following eleven native species are newly reported or recently confirmed for Connecticut: Andrena (Cnemidandrena) parnassi----ae Cockerell; Andrena (Melandrena) sayi Robertson; Andrena (Trachandrena) rehni Viereck; Anthophora bomboides Kirby; Nomada armatella Cockerell; Nomada electella Cockerell; Nomada placida Cresson; Lasioglossum (Dialictus) cattellae (Ellis); Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ellisiae (Sandhouse); Lasioglossum (Dialictus) fattigi (Mitchell); Lasioglossum (Dialictus) trigeminum Gibbs. The following recent arrivals among non-native species are confirmed: Pseudoanthidium (Pseudoanthidium) nanum (Mocsáry); Coelioxys (Allocoelioxys) coturnix Pérez; Osmia (Osmia) taurus Smith. This work is a stepping stone towards a larger, ongoing effort to clarify bee distribution and status in New England. As such, we also report updates for the bee fauna of the following states: Massachusetts-Melissodes communis communis Cresson; Megachile (Eutricharaea) apicalis Spinola), Maine-Chelostoma philadelphi (Robertson), and New Hampshire-Lasioglossum nelumbonis (Robertson).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy A Zarrillo
- Department of Entomology; Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station; New Haven; CT; USA 06511.
| | - Kimberly A Stoner
- Department of Entomology; Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station; New Haven; CT; USA 06511.
| | - John S Ascher
- Department of Biological Science; National University of Singapore; Singapore 117543.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marquisseau A, Canale-Tabet K, Labarthe E, Pascal G, Klopp C, Pornon A, Escaravage N, Rudelle R, Vignal A, Ouin A, Ollivier M, Pichon M. Building a reliable 16S mini-barcode library of wild bees from Occitania, south-west of France. Biodivers Data J 2025; 13:e137540. [PMID: 39816673 PMCID: PMC11733625 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.12.e137540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Background DNA barcoding and metabarcoding are now powerful tools for studying biodiversity and especially the accurate identification of large sample collections belonging to diverse taxonomic groups. Their success depends largely on the taxonomic resolution of the DNA sequences used as barcodes and on the reliability of the reference databases. For wild bees, the barcode sequences coverage is consistently growing in volume, but some incorrect species annotations need to be cared for. The COI (Cytochrome Oxydase subunit 1) gene, the most used in barcoding/metabarcoding of arthropods, suffers from primer bias and difficulties for covering all wild bee species using the classical Folmer primers. New information We present here a curated database for a 250 bp mini-barcode region of the 16S rRNA gene, suitable for low-cost metabarcoding wild bees in applications, such as eDNA analysis or for sequencing ancient or degraded DNA. Sequenced specimens were captured in Occitania (south-west of France) and morphologically identified by entomologists, with a total of 530 individuals belonging to 171 species and 19 genera. A customised workflow including distance-tree inferences and a second round of entomologist observations, when necessary, was used for the validation of 348 mini-barcodes covering 148 species. Amongst them, 93 species did not have any 16S reference barcode available before our contribution. This high-quality reference library data are freely available to the scientific community, with the aim of facilitating future large-scale characterisation of wild bee communities in a context of pollinators' decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaïs Marquisseau
- Dynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceDynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Kamila Canale-Tabet
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Emmanuelle Labarthe
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Géraldine Pascal
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Christophe Klopp
- MIAT, INRAE, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceMIAT, INRAE, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - André Pornon
- CRBE, CNRS, UPS, IRD, INP, 31077, Toulouse, FranceCRBE, CNRS, UPS, IRD, INP, 31077ToulouseFrance
| | - Nathalie Escaravage
- CRBE, CNRS, UPS, IRD, INP, 31077, Toulouse, FranceCRBE, CNRS, UPS, IRD, INP, 31077ToulouseFrance
| | - Rémi Rudelle
- Rudelide Expertise muséologie, Rieupeyroux, FranceRudelide Expertise muséologieRieupeyrouxFrance
| | - Alain Vignal
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Annie Ouin
- Dynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceDynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Mélodie Ollivier
- Dynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceDynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| | - Magalie Pichon
- Dynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, FranceDynafor, INRAE, INP, ENSAT, 31326Castanet TolosanFrance
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sless TJL, Branstetter MG, Mikát M, Odanaka KA, Tobin KB, Rehan SM. Phylogenomics and biogeography of the small carpenter bees (Apidae: Xylocopinae: Ceratina). Mol Phylogenet Evol 2024; 198:108133. [PMID: 38897426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Small carpenter bees in the genus Ceratina are behaviourally diverse, species-rich, and cosmopolitan, with over 370 species and a range including all continents except Antarctica. Here, we present the first comprehensive phylogeny of the genus based on ultraconserved element (UCE) phylogenomic data, covering a total of 185 ingroup specimens representing 22 of the 25 current subgenera. Our results support most recognized subgenera as natural groups, but we also highlight several groups in need of taxonomic revision - particularly the nominate subgenus Ceratina sensu stricto - and several clades that likely need to be described as new subgenera. In addition to phylogeny, we explore the evolutionary history of Ceratina through divergence time estimation and biogeographic reconstruction. Our findings suggest that Ceratinini split from its sister tribe Allodapini about 72 million years ago. The common ancestor of Ceratina emerged in the Afrotropical realm approximately 42 million years ago, near the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum. Multiple subsequent dispersal events led to the present cosmopolitan distribution of Ceratina, with the majority of transitions occurring between the Afrotropics, Indomalaya, and the Palearctic. Additional movements also led to the arrival of Ceratina in Madagascar, Australasia, and a single colonization of the Americas. Dispersal events were asymmetrical overall, with temperate regions primarily acting as destinations for migrations from tropical source regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael G Branstetter
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA
| | - Michael Mikát
- Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of General Zoology, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany; Department of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Kerrigan B Tobin
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sandra M Rehan
- Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bernauer OM, Branstetter MG, Cook JM, Tierney SM. Functional trait mismatch between native and introduced bee pollinators servicing a global fruit crop. BMC Ecol Evol 2024; 24:104. [PMID: 39095704 PMCID: PMC11295329 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02293-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding connections between biodiversity and ecosystem services can be enhanced by shifting focus from species richness to functional trait-based approaches, that when paired with comparative phylogenetic methods can provide even deeper insights. We investigated the functional ecology and phylogenetic diversity of pollination services provided by hymenopteran insects visiting apple flowers in orchards surrounded by either 'natural' or 'disturbed' landscapes in New South Wales, Australia. We assessed whether morphological and behavioural traits (hairiness, body size, glossa length, pollen load purity, and probability of loose pollen) exhibited non-random phylogenetic patterns. Then, explored whether bees, the primary pollinators in this system, filled unique or overlapping functional entities (FEs). For each landscape, we calculated phylogenetic diversity and used FEs to assess functional richness, evenness, and diversion. RESULTS A phylogenomic matrix based on ultraconserved elements (UCEs; 1,382,620 bp from 1,969 loci) was used to infer a fully-resolved and well-supported maximum likelihood phylogeny for 48 hymenopteran morphospecies. There was no significant difference in species richness between landscape categories. Pollinator communities at natural sites had higher phylogenetic complexity (X = 2.37) and functional divergence (x̄ = 0.74 ± 0.02 s.e.) than disturbed sites (X = 1.65 and x̄ = 0.6 ± 0.01 s.e.). Hairiness showed significant phylogenetic clustering (K = 0.94), whereas body size, glossa length, and loose pollen showed weaker non-random phylogenetic patterns (K between 0.3-0.5). Pollen load purity showed no association with phylogeny. The assemblage of 17 bee morphospecies comprised nine FEs: eight FEs consisted of native bees with three containing 65% of all native bee taxa. The introduced honey bee (Apis mellifera) occupied a unique FE, likely due to its different evolutionary history. Both landscape types supported six FEs each with three overlapping: two native bee FEs and the honey bee FE. CONCLUSIONS Bee hairiness was the only functional trait to exhibit demonstrable phylogenetic signal. Despite differences in species richness, and functional and phylogenetic diversity between orchard landscape types, both maintained equal bee FE numbers. While no native bee taxon was analogous to the honey bee FE, four native bee FEs shared the same hairiness level as honey bees. Health threats to honey bee populations in Australia will likely disrupt pollination services to apple, and other pollination-dependent food crops, given the low level of functional redundancy within the investigated pollinator assemblages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia M Bernauer
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Dr. Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Michael G Branstetter
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Utah State University, 5310 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322, USA
| | - James M Cook
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Simon M Tierney
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crowley LM, University of Oxford and Wytham Woods Genome Acquisition Lab, Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective, Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective, Tree of Life Core Informatics collective, Darwin Tree of Life Consortium. The genome sequence of Fabricius' Nomad Bee, Nomada fabriciana (Linne, 1767). Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:497. [PMID: 38558924 PMCID: PMC10980859 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20184.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual female Nomada fabriciana (Fabricius' Nomad Bee; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Apidae). The genome sequence is 233.6 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 12 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 19.4 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 9,700 protein coding genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam M. Crowley
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim K, Lee S, Orr M, Lee S. Harrison's rule corroborated for the body size of cleptoparasitic cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae) and their hosts. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10984. [PMID: 35768474 PMCID: PMC9243014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14938-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Harrison’s rule, that body size is positively correlated between parasites and hosts, has been reported in a range of taxa, but whether the rule is applicable to cleptoparasitic insects is poorly understood. Subfamily Nomadinae, the largest group of cleptoparasitic bees, usurp the nests of a variety of host bees. Within the subfamily, Nomada exploits the most diverse hosts, using at least ten genera from five families. Here, we reassess the phylogeny of Nomadinae, including the expanded sampling of the genus Nomada, to explore host shift fluctuations throughout their evolutionary history and test the applicability of Harrison’s rule for the subfamily. Our phylogenetic results are mostly congruent with previous investigations, but we infer the tribe Hexepeolini as a sister taxon to the tribe Nomadini. Additionally, the results reveal discrepancies with the traditional classifications of Nomada. Ancestral state reconstruction of host use indicates that, early in their evolution, parasites used closer relatives, before attacking less related groups later. Lastly, we confirm Harrison’s rule in Nomadinae, supporting that body size dynamics influence the host shifts of cleptoparasitic bees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayun Lim
- Insect Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Seunghyun Lee
- Insect Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.,Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 92 Box, No. 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China
| | - Michael Orr
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 92 Box, No. 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China
| | - Seunghwan Lee
- Insect Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. .,Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|