Equitable implementation of S.A.F.E. Firearm: A multi-method pilot study

Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future

Implementation science aspires to equitably accelerate the uptake of clinical research into practice to improve population health. The focus of implementation science includes individual behavior change mechanisms that are similar to those that drive the field of clinical psychology. For this reason, clinical psychologists are well-suited to take up implementation science methods in pursuit of improving the quality of behavioral health care. To do so, clinical psychologists must expand beyond individual behavior change to include a focus on organizations and systems. In this review, we reflect on ways that clinical psychologists can lead in the integration of implementation science principles and approaches into clinical psychology research and practice. We discuss the role clinical psychologists play in closing know-do gaps in behavioral health and describe how clinical psychologists can build implementation science competencies. We end with current controversies and opportunities for innovation to further improve the quality of behavioral health care.

Implementation of a Secure Firearm Storage Program in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Importance

Increased secure firearm storage can reduce youth firearm injury and mortality, a leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the US. Despite the availability of evidence-based secure firearm storage programs and recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, few pediatric clinicians report routinely implementing these programs.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR) documentation template (nudge) and the nudge plus facilitation (ie, clinic support to implement the program; nudge+) at promoting delivery of a brief evidence-based secure firearm storage program (SAFE Firearm) that includes counseling about secure firearm storage and free cable locks during all pediatric well visits.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Adolescent and Child Suicide Prevention in Routine Clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) unblinded parallel cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial was conducted from March 14, 2022, to March 20, 2023, to test the hypothesis that, relative to nudge, nudge+ would result in delivery of the firearm storage program to an additional 10% or more of the eligible population, and that this difference would be statistically significant. Thirty pediatric primary care clinics in 2 US health care systems (in Michigan and Colorado) were included, excluding clinics that were not the primary site for participating health care professionals and a subset selected at random due to resource limitations. All pediatric well visits at participating clinics for youth ages 5 to 17 years were analyzed.

Interventions

Clinics were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nudge or nudge+.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient-level outcomes were modeled to estimate the primary outcome, reach, which is a visit-level binary indicator of whether the parent received both components of the firearm storage program (counseling and lock), as documented by the clinician in the EHR. Secondary outcomes explored individual program component delivery.

Results

A total of 47 307 well-child visits (median [IQR] age, 11.3 [8.1-14.4] years; 24 210 [51.2%] male and 23 091 [48.8%] female) among 46 597 children and 368 clinicians were eligible to receive the firearm storage program during the trial and were included in analyses. Using the intention-to-treat principle, a higher percentage of well-child visits received the firearm storage program in the nudge+ condition (49%; 95% CI, 37-61) compared to nudge (22%; 95% CI, 13-31).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, the EHR strategy combined with facilitation (nudge+) was more effective at increasing delivery of an evidence-based secure firearm storage program compared to nudge alone.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844021.

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design

Background

Implementation strategies are potential tools for advancing equity goals in healthcare. Implementation scientists have increased attention to the integration of equity considerations into implementation research, but limited concrete guidance is available for developing implementation strategies to improve equity.

Main

In parallel to an active hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in two large health systems, our research team explored potential inequities in implementation across four non-study clinics, developed equity focused audit and feedback procedures, examined the feasibility of our approach, and identified design insights that could be tested in future work to inform equitable program scale-up. Based on our experiences deploying these strategies in pilot format, our research team identified key complexities meriting further examination in future work. These considerations are vital given the dearth of guidance on delivering feedback to clinicians in efforts to improve equity. Key takeaways include the importance of understanding local data culture, engaging constituents in co-design for the full feedback cycle, leveraging feedback for shared discourse, and centering multi-level strategies as part of robust implementation approaches.

Conclusion

Prioritizing health equity in implementation science requires that research teams probe, interrogate, and innovate - and in doing so, grapple with central conceptual and pragmatic considerations that arise in the design of implementation strategies. Our work emphasizes the value of bidirectional and continuous learning.

A vision for implementing equitable early mental health and resilience support in pediatric primary care: A transdiagnostic, developmental approach

INTRODUCTION

Primary care is at the forefront of addressing the pediatric mental health (MH) crisis due to its broad reach to young children and prevention and health promotion orientation. However, the promise of the delivery system for population impact remains unrealized due to several barriers, including pragmatic screening, decisional uncertainty, and limited access to evidence-based services.

METHOD

This article lays the conceptual foundations for the articles in this Special Section on Mental Health, Earlier in Pediatric Primary Care, which all apply a translational mindset to proposed strategies and solutions to overcome the barriers that have limited the potential of pediatric primary care for improving the MH and wellbeing of all children.

RESULTS

Valid, pragmatic, transdiagnostic, developmentally-based screening measures to identify children at heightened risk are needed. Risk screening for MH problems should assess and empirically weight socioecological risk and protective factors, as well as the child's own assets for resilience to determine probabilistic risk. Pediatric clinicians require clear clinical cutoffs and guidelines for action when risk for MH problems is identified.

DISCUSSION

These strategies-a developmentally-based screener with associated risk calculator that offers clear guidance to pediatric clinicians-address decisional uncertainty regarding when to worry and when to act. The communication of probabilistic risk requires additional client-centered communication skills to overcome different types of biases (e.g., implicit, benevolent, and cognitive) that contribute to MH inequities and decisional uncertainty in acting on identified risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).