[Stomach cancer: have changes in surgical strategy influenced the results? 20-year retrospective study]

WITHDRAWN: Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Surgeons disagree about the merits and risks of radical lymph node clearance during gastrectomy for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate survival and peri-operative mortality after limited or extended lymph node removal during gastrectomy for cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, LILACS, Central Medical Journal Japanese Database and the Cochrane register, references from relevant articles and conference proceedings. We contacted known workers in the field. For the updated review, the Cochrane Library, M EDLINE , E MBASE and LILACS were searched from 2001 to April 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies published after 1970 which reported 5 year survival or postoperative mortality rates, and clearly defined the node dissection performed, were considered. We excluded studies which overtly included patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy, and comparisons with clear systematic treatment allocation bias. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised comparisons and observational studies were considered separately.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers selected trials for inclusion. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Results of trials of similar design were pooled. Meta-analysis was performed separately for randomised and non-randomised comparisons.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised and two non-randomised comparisons of limited (D1) versus extended (D2) node dissection and 11 cohort studies of either D1 or D2 resection were analysed. Meta-analysis of randomised trials did not reveal any survival benefit for extended lymph node dissection (Risk ratio = 0.95 (95% CI 0.83 - 1.09), but showed increased postoperative mortality (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.45 - 3.45). Pre-specified subgroup analysis suggested a possible benefit in stage T3+ tumours (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.42-1.10). Non-randomised comparisons showed no significant survival benefit for extended dissection (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 -1.02), but decreased mortality (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93). Subgroup analysis showed apparent benefit in UICC stage II and IIIa. Observational studies of D2 resection reported much better mortality and survival than those of D1 surgery, but the settings were strikingly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

D2 dissection carries increased mortality risks associated with spleen and pancreas resection, and probably with inexperience and low case volumes. Randomised studies show no evidence of overall survival benefit, but possible benefit in T3+ tumours. These results may be confounded by surgical learning curves and poor surgeon compliance. Non-randomised comparisons suggest a possible survival benefit for D2 in intermediate UICC stages. Observational studies show high 5 year survival and low operative mortality after D2 dissection in experienced units, and poor results after D1 dissection in non-specialist units. Further studies, with precautions to eliminate learning curve effects, contamination and non-compliance, are needed to evaluate D2 dissection in intermediate stage gastric cancer.

Insufficiency risk of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total abdominal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The outcome and quality of surgical treatment in gastric cancer are closely associated with specific postoperative morbidity and mortality, in addition to an oncosurgically adequate resection status. In this context, a preventive concept of decreasing the insufficiency rate of esophageal anastomosis may have a great impact.

METHOD

Over a time period of 12 months (from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002), 1,199 patients (from 80 East German hospitals) with gastric carcinoma, carcinoma of the esophagogastral junction, or gastrointestinal stroma tumor (GIST) were enrolled in this prospective multicenter observational study with the aim of evaluating their early postoperative outcome. By means of a logistic regression analysis, independent variables, which alter significantly the healing of esophagojejunal anastomosis, were determined; in addition, their clinical impact on preventive management to lower the insufficiency rate of esophageal anastomosis was investigated.

RESULTS

In 1,139 patients, histological investigation revealed gastric carcinoma. Out of these patients, 1,031 subjects underwent surgical intervention (90.5%) and 891 individuals underwent resection (86.4%). In 813 patients, radical resection (subtotal resection and gastrectomy) was executed (78.9%), whereas in 726 cases, R(0) resection was achieved (81.5%). Gastrectomy was the preferred procedure in 649 patients, resulting in a gastrectomy rate of 62.9% relating to all patients who underwent operation (curative and palliative intention, 80.3% and 19.7%, respectively). The insufficiency rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis was 5.7% (37/649). Neither the comparison between the various procedures for the reconstruction of the esophagojejunal passage and anastomosing techniques after gastrectomy nor that between gastrectomies with curative and palliative intention revealed any significant difference. Dysphagia and gastric outlet syndrome due to a stenosis were determined as independent variables by a logistic regression analysis of all preoperative and intraoperative variables. In all patients with gastric carcinoma, both parameters were recorded in 9.9% (113/1,139) and 6.7% (76/1,139), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia and gastric stenosis, which significantly influence the healing of esophagojejunal anastomosis after gastrectomy, are considered characteristics of an advanced tumor growth and a pretherapeutic lack of an adequate nutrition. This emphasizes the necessity of an early diagnosis of gastric cancer in order to lower perioperative morbidity. In addition, dysphagia is commonly associated with an obstruction of the upper gastrointestinal tract, which can lead to nutritional deficits, and thus deserves specific care during preventive management.

Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Surgeons disagree about the merits and risks of radical lymph node clearance during gastrectomy for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate survival and peri-operative mortality after limited or extended lymph node removal during gastrectomy for cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, LILACS, Central Medical Journal Japanese Database and the Cochrane register, references from relevant articles and conference proceedings. We contacted known workers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies published after 1970 which reported 5 year survival or postoperative mortality rates, and clearly defined the node dissection performed, were considered. We excluded studies which overtly included patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy, and comparisons with clear systematic treatment allocation bias. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised comparisons and observational studies were considered separately.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers selected trials for inclusion. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Results of trials of similar design were pooled. Meta-analysis was performed separately for randomised and non-randomised comparisons.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised and two non-randomised comparisons of limited (D1) versus extended (D2) node dissection and 11 cohort studies of either D1 or D2 resection were analysed. Meta-analysis of randomised trials did not reveal any survival benefit for extended lymph node dissection (Risk ratio = 0.95 (95% CI 0.83 - 1.09), but showed increased postoperative mortality (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.45 - 3.45). Pre-specified subgroup analysis suggested a possible benefit in stage T3+ tumours (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.42-1.10). Non-randomised comparisons showed no significant survival benefit for extended dissection (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 -1.02), but decreased mortality (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93). Subgroup analysis showed apparent benefit in UICC stage II and IIIa. Observational studies of D2 resection reported much better mortality and survival than those of D1 surgery, but the settings were strikingly different.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

D2 dissection carries increased mortality risks associated with spleen and pancreas resection, and probably with inexperience and low case volumes. Randomised studies show no evidence of overall survival benefit, but possible benefit in T3+ tumours. These results may be confounded by surgical learning curves and poor surgeon compliance. Non-randomised comparisons suggest a possible survival benefit for D2 in intermediate UICC stages. Observational studies show high 5 year survival and low operative mortality after D2 dissection in experienced units, and poor results after D1 dissection in non-specialist units. Further studies, with precautions to eliminate learning curve effects, contamination and non-compliance, are needed to evaluate D2 dissection in intermediate stage gastric cancer.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled if they underwent resection of gastric cancer but had lymph node or serosal involvement or both. Surgical resection was either total or partial gastrectomy according to the site of the tumor, and surgeons were allowed to perform either D1 or D2 gastrectomy. The subjects were random assigned in two treatment groups as follows: surgery alone as the control group, or surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine cycles of 5 days protocol every 4 weeks was proposed to the patients of the chemotherapy group. The protocol included a daily administration of 200 mg/m(2) of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (375 mg/m(2) during the first session increasing 25 mg by session until reaching 500 mg/m(2)) and CDDP 15 mg/m(2). Two hundred patients were required. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared according to the log-rank and the Mantel-Haenszel methods.

RESULTS

In all, 205 patients were enrolled in the study; 104 had surgery alone and 101 had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients' characteristics were similar except for the mean age, which was 4 years less in the control group. Because of toxicity, 54% of the patients stopped the protocol before the end of the nine courses, and 46% of the patients received the nine courses including 32% with a decreased dose and 14% with a full dose. The 5-year survival rate was 39% in the control group and 39% in the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the 5-year survival after resection for gastric cancer.

[Stomach adenocarcinoma. Evolution of surgical treatment in a series of 350 cases]

STUDY AIM

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate, in a series of 350 gastric adenocarcinomas, the evolution of their clinical and histological features and the evolution of their surgical management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1970 to 1996, 350 patients with gastric carcinoma (cardiac cancer excluded) were operated on in the same center. Mean age was 68.8 years and the sex ratio 1:4. These patients were divided into three groups which were analysed and compared (group 1 operated on between 1970 and 1988, group 2 between 1979 and 1987, group 3 between 1988 and 1996).

RESULTS

Antropyloric cancer was the most common (56% in group 3). Tumor size decreased but there were in group 3 more undifferentiated tumors (54.2%) and more tumors with lymph node involvement (72%). Stage III and IV tumors were still common (70% in group 3) and early gastric cancer incidence very low (9.9%). After 1980, surgical management was more radical, with more total gastrectomies and larger lymph node dissections. Adjuvant intraoperative and postoperative radiotherapy has been associated since 1985. Postoperative mortality rate decreased (13.8% in group 1 vs 6.1% in group 3) (P = 0.04) as did the postoperative morbidity rate (31.8% in group 1 vs 17.5% in group 3). The five-year actuarial survival rate was respectively 18.9% and 39.2% for groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.003); it was respectively 59.8% and 43.6% for all patients treated by adjuvant radiotherapy and for those with lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma is still poor. A more radical surgical treatment did not increase the postoperative morbidity rate, but increased the survival rate. New adjuvant treatments including radiotherapy have to be evaluated in order to improve the prognosis.