An interdisciplinary nutrition support team improves quality of care in a teaching hospital

Systematic review with meta-analysis: effects of implementing a nutrition support team for in-hospital parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Nutrition support teams (NST) may improve parenteral nutrition (PN) outcomes. No previous systematic review has provided conclusive data on catheter-related infection (CRI) occurrence after NST introduction, nor have previous studies performed meta-analysis or graded the evidence.

AIMS

To systematically evaluate the effects of implementing an NST for hospitalised adults on PN and compare these with standard care.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis, pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020218094). On November 24, 2020, PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Key were searched. Clinical trials and observational studies with a standard care comparator were included. Primary outcome was relative reduction in CRI rate. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate effects, and evidence was rated using Cochrane and GRADE methodologies.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies with 8166 patients were included. Across 10 studies, NST introduction reduced the CRI rate (IRR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.53) with -8 (95% CI: -12 to -5) episodes per 1000 catheter days compared with standard care. Hypophosphataemia occurred less frequently (IRD = -12%, 95% CI: -24% to -1%) and 30-day mortality decreased (IRD = -6%, 95% CI: -11% to -1%). Inappropriate PN use decreased, both judged by indication (IRD = -18%, 95% CI: -28% to -9%) and duration (IRD = -21%, 95% CI: -33% to -9%). Evidence was rated very low to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents the clinical impact of introducing an NST, with moderate-grade evidence for the reduction of CRI occurrence compared with standard care. Further, NST introduction significantly reduced metabolic complications, mortality, and inappropriate PN use.

Quality and safety impact on the provision of parenteral nutrition through introduction of a nutrition support team

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Parenteral nutrition (PN) should be provided to the malnourished patient if enteral feeding is insufficient or unsafe. A nutrition support team (NST) may improve PN services. We compared the use and complications of hospital PN before and after the implementation of an NST.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

All inpatients referred for PN outside of the intensive care unit and the intestinal failure unit were prospectively included from 2009 to 2012. The NST was introduced in 2010. Quality improvement methodology was applied.

RESULTS

In 2009, a mean of 16 (limits of normal variation 4-28) patients were referred for PN each month. After introduction of the NST, this rose to 26 (10-42) referrals per month. The percentage of referrals where PN was not initiated increased from 5.3% in 2009 to 10.1% in 2012 (P=0.03). This increase was restricted to teams that infrequently referred for PN, and enteral nutrition could replace PN in 31 of 51 patients (61%) as compared with 8 of 32 (25%) patients referred from teams that frequently referred for PN (P=0.001). The frequency of PN started owing to an insufficient oral or enteral intake decreased from 11% to 3% (P=0.01). The catheter-related bloodstream infection rate dropped from 6.7 to 0.7 episodes per 1000 catheter days (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of an NST increased both the total PN use and the percentage of referrals where enteral nutrition could replace PN. Medical specialty influenced the referral pattern and the likelihood that a referral resulted in PN being initiated. Safety of PN catheters improved significantly following NST introduction.

The Use of Parenteral Nutrition in an Acute Care Hospital

Introduction: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an important supportive therapy. However, it is expensive and associated with significant complications. Our aim is to describe the patients given PN in 2006, to compare with the 2001 cohort and determine if PN had been prescribed for the appropriate indications. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients receiving PN between January and December 2006 was undertaken in a single institution. Appropriateness of indications for PN was based on the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) guidelines 2002. Results: One hundred and eighty-two patients received 194 courses (102 males, 92 females) of PN. Median age was 62 years (range, 16 to 100). Eighty-two percent were surgical patients and 18% were medical patients. Median PN duration was 9 days (range, 2 to 115). Common indications were surgeons’ anticipation of non-functioning gut postoperatively [47 (24.2%) courses], postoperative complications [33 (17.0%) courses] and postoperative ileus [31 (16.1%) courses]. Indications for PN met A.S.P.E.N. guidelines in 93.3% of cases compared to 78.3% in 2001. In 1.5% of cases, we were unable to determine if the indications met the guidelines. Ten courses did not meet the guidelines; 3 had PN for <7 days preoperatively, 6 had PN because the managing team thought the patients were critically ill and 1 was given PN for refusal to eat because of depression. Conclusion: Since 2001, there has been an increase in the proportion of PN given for appropriate indications. However, physician education with respect to the benefit of PN for preoperative and critically ill patients with functioning guts needs reinforcing. Key words: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N) guidelines, Indications of Parenteral Nutrition, Inappropriate use of Parenteral Nutrition

Nutrition support teams: how they work, are set up and maintained

Safe cost effective nutritional support is provided by a multidisciplinary team whose activity is overseen by a Nutrition Steering Group that reports directly to the Hospital Trust Board. When a nutrition support team (NST) is first formed, a nutrition nurse specialist enables parenteral nutrition to be given safely. An NST needs to have a clearly agreed scope of practice and needs to be able to justify its presence in terms of quality and cost savings.

Cost savings of an adult hospital nutrition support team

OBJECTIVES

A hospital-based nutrition support team (NST) may need to demonstrate cost savings and quality benefits. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether an NST could show tangible cost savings (equipment, investigations, and medication costs) from managing patients considered for parenteral nutrition (PN). Secondary aims related to the quality issues of placement of PN catheters, catheter-related sepsis (CRS), duration of parenteral nutrition, and mortality.

METHODS

An NST was formed in 1999 and worked in all adult areas of a university hospital (Leicester Royal Infirmary). Comparative data about all patients given PN were collected for 2 consecutive years (a retrospective pre-NST year and a prospective NST year).

RESULTS

In the pre-NST year there were 82 PN episodes (54 patients), 665 PN days, and a CRS rate of 71% (seven infections/100 PN days). In the NST year, there were 133 referrals for PN but only 78 PN episodes (75 patients, 59% of referrals), 752 PN days, and a decreased overall CRS rate of 29% (three infections/100 PN days, P < 0.05) but a rate of 7% (0.6 infection/100 PN days) in the final 3 mo of the NST year. Tangible cost savings for the NST year were derived from 55 avoided PN episodes (42741 pounds sterlings) and 35 avoided CRS episodes (7974 pounds sterlings). Thirty-nine percent of PN catheters were inserted by the NST with no insertion-related complications. Competency-based training of ward nursing staff decreased the CRS rate. Mean duration of PN increased from 8 to 10 d (P not significant). In-hospital mortality for patients who had PN was 23 of 54 (43%) in the pre-NST year compared with 18 of 75 (24%) in the NST year (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of PN days increased with an NST, tangible cost savings of 50715 pounds sterlings were demonstrated within the NST year by avoided PN episodes and a decreased incidence of CRS. These savings justify the salaries of a nutrition nurse specialist and a senior dietitian.

The need for nutrition support teams in pediatric units: a commentary by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition

The reported prevalence of malnutrition in pediatric hospitals ranges from 15% to 30% of patients, with an impact on growth, morbidity and mortality. Major deficits in nutrition care have been highlighted in European hospitals, and the implementation of nutrition support teams (NSTs) has been suggested as a means to improve malnutrition diagnosis and nutrition care for hospitalized patients. This comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition reviews disease related-mechanisms causing malnutrition and consequences of malnutrition and suggests a framework for implementation of NSTs in pediatric units. The recommendations by the Committee on Nutrition include: 1) Implementation of NSTs in hospitals is recommended to improve nutritional management of sick children; 2) The main tasks of the NST should include screening for nutritional risk, identification of patients who require nutritional support, provision of adequate nutritional management, education and training of hospital staff and audit of practice; 3) The NST should be multidisciplinary, with expertise in all aspects of clinical nutrition care; 4) The funds needed to support NSTs should be raised from the health care system; and 5) Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of NSTs in prevention and management of pediatric nutritional disorders, including cost effectiveness in different settings.

A Nutrition Support Team Led by General Surgeons Decreases Inappropriate Use of Total Parenteral Nutrition on a Surgical Service

The purpose of this study was to decrease the number of inappropriate orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in surgical patients. From February 1999 through November 2000 and between July 2001 and June 2002, the surgeon-guided adult nutrition support team (NST) at a university hospital monitored new TPN orders for appropriateness and specific indication. In April 1999, the NST was given authority to discontinue inappropriate TPN orders. Indications, based on the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) standards, included short gut, severe pancreatitis, severe malnutrition/catabolism with inability to enterally feed ≥5 days, inability to enterally feed ≥50 per cent of nutritional needs ≥9 days, enterocutaneous fistula, intraabdominal leak, bowel obstruction, chylothorax, ischemic bowel, hemodynamic instability, massive gastrointestinal bleed, and lack of abdominal wall integrity. The number of inappropriate TPN orders declined from 62/194 (32.0%) in the first 11 months of the study to 22/168 (13.1%) in the second 11 months ( P < 0.0001). This number further declined to 17/215 (7.9%) in the final 12 months of data collection, but compared to the second 11 months, this decrease was not statistically significant ( P = 0.1347). The involvement of a surgical NST was associated with a reduction in inappropriate TPN orders without a change in overall use.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary total parenteral nutrition team in the hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a form of nutritional support that has become an essential adjunct to the management of patients who are unable to obtain adequate nutrition either via the oral or enteral route. Previous studies indicate that TPN can be administered safely and effectively to patients; however, there are associated risks with this form of nutritional support. Researchers have indicated that due to the complexity of TPN therapy a high level of knowledge and expertise is required in the management of these patients. The multidisciplinary team approach has been supported for its ability to assess the patients' nutritional status, prescribe the nutritional requirements, and reduce the incidence of metabolic complications through regular monitoring. However, contradictory views on the effectiveness of multidisciplinary TPN teams in health-care facilities have also been reported.

AIM

The aim of this review was to critically analyse the literature and present the best available evidence that investigated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary TPN teams in the provision of TPN to adult hospitalised patients. The primary outcomes included: incidence of catheter-related complications, types of catheter-related complications, incidence of metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities, provision of nutritional requirements, estimated nutritional requirements, number of patients whose nutritional goals were met and the amount of energy and protein provided. Secondary outcomes included cost effectiveness of nutritional support teams and physician compliance with team recommendations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The literature search sought to identify both published and unpublished studies utilising various search strategies and the Internet. The Cochrane Library (2001, Issue 4) was initially searched to identify randomised controlled trials. The other electronic databases searched included CINAHL, Complete Medline, Complete Biomedical Collection, Complete Nursing Collection, and EMBASE. Experts and company representatives were contacted to identify published reports as well as research in progress relevant to this review. Professional bodies were contacted and included the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN) and the Australasian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AuSPEN).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and non-randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of multidisciplinary TPN teams, in the provision of TPN to adult hospitalised patients, were considered for inclusion in this review. Trials were included if they reported objective or subjective measures of nutritional, metabolic and catheter-related complications and cost effectiveness. To minimise publication bias studies reported in other languages were also considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The eligibility of studies for inclusion, the methodological quality and data extraction were undertaken independently by two reviewers and cross-checked by a third reviewer. The studies included in the review have been synthesised as a narrative overview.

RESULTS

Eleven studies comparing the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary TPN team in the hospital setting were analysed in this review. Six studies that investigated the incidence of total mechanical complications reported a higher incidence of these complications in patients who were managed by their physician. Catheter-related sepsis was investigated in seven studies of which five reported a reduction and two reported an increase in catheter-related sepsis in patients managed by the team. One study reported no statistically significant difference in the total metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities and four studies reported fewer of these abnormalities in patients cared for by the nutrition team. Overfeeding and underfeeding in patients not managed by the TPN team were reported in five studies. The most appropriate route of feeding was investigated in four studies. Two of the four studies reported that patients managed by the team were more likely to be fed by the most appropriate route and the findings from the remaining two studies were unclear. Cost effectiveness of the TPN team was reported in two studies and a reduction in costs was demonstrated in both studies when the patients were managed by the TPN team. Compliance by physicians to recommendations made by the TPN team was investigated in two studies, and both reported that physicians complied with at least 50% of the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The general effectiveness of the TPN team has not been conclusively demonstrated. There is evidence that patients managed by TPN teams have a reduced incidence of total mechanical complications; however, it is unclear if there is a reduction in catheter-related sepsis. The conflicting results relating to the benefit of the TPN teams in the reduction of electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities indicate that further research is needed to clarify the impact of TPN teams on this outcome. The provision of the patients estimated energy requirements are positively influenced when managed by the TPN team; however, the evidence relating to the effectiveness of the TPN team in the provision of protein requirements remains unclear. From this review it is unclear if management of the patients by the TPN team prevented the inappropriate use of TPN. The limited data obtained from the studies provide evidence of a clinically important difference between groups in terms of cost effectiveness.

The medical and financial costs associated with termination of a nutrition support nurse

BACKGROUND

Cost-containment pressures have adversely affected hospital nutrition support team staffing. We determined the effect of termination of a nutrition support nurse responsible for patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on quality assurance and financial indicators.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all 1,093 patients receiving TPN from fiscal year (FY) 1992 through FY 1998 in a tertiary care community hospital. We documented the changes in care during years when the nutrition support nurse position was staffed, terminated, and restored. Indicators studied included inappropriate TPN, central venous line sepsis, TPN wastage, and estimates of preventable costs.

RESULTS

When the nurse was present, 8.6% of TPN patients had a functional gastrointestinal (GI) tract and inappropriately received TPN compared with 12.1% when the nurse was absent, a risk difference of 3.5% points (95% confidence interval [CI], -.06 to 8.3; p = .069). Risk of TPN-associated line sepsis increased from 8.8% of patients when the nurse was present to 13.2% when the nurse was absent, a difference of 4.4% points (95% CI, 0.06 to 9.2; p = .028). In the absence of the nurse, 26.3% of TPN patients had preventable charges vs 17.5% when the nurse was present (p < .0001). Total preventable charges were higher in the years without a nurse (p < .003). Total preventable costs increased by $38,148 to $194,285 (depending on the estimate for sepsis) in the year after termination. Reinstatement of the nurse resulted in a decrease in costs between $34,485 and $156,654.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate staffing of a nutrition support team reduced inappropriate TPN and complications of TPN. Financial savings of the same order of magnitude as the nurse's compensation accompany substantial decreases in patient morbidity.