Containment of heart failure hospitalizations and cost by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dosage optimization

Financial Toxicity of Medical Management of Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Optimal medical management of heart failure (HF) improves quality of life, decreases mortality, and decreases hospitalizations. Cost may contribute to suboptimal adherence to HF medications, especially angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Patients' experiences with HF medication cost include financial burden, financial strain, and financial toxicity. Although there has been research studying financial toxicity in patients with some chronic diseases, there are no validated tools for measuring financial toxicity of HF, and very few data on the subjective experiences of patients with HF and financial toxicity. Strategies to decrease HF-associated financial toxicity include making systemic changes to minimize cost sharing, optimizing shared decision-making, implementing policies to lower drug costs, broadening insurance coverage, and using financial navigation services and discount programs. Clinicians may also improve patient financial wellness through various strategies in routine clinical care. Future research is needed to study financial toxicity and associated patient experiences for HF.

Multidimensional Interventions on Supporting Disease Management for Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure: The Role of Clinical and Community Pharmacists

BACKGROUND

existing trials on the role of clinical pharmacists in managing chronic disease patients have focused on variety of interventions, including preparing patients for the transition from hospital to home. However, little quantitative evidence is available regarding the effect of multidimensional interventions on supporting disease management for hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF). The present paper reviews the effects of inpatient, discharge and/or after-discharge interventions performed on hospitalized HF patients by multidisciplinary teams, including pharmacists.

METHODS

articles were identified through search engines in three electronic databases following the PRISMA Protocol. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomized intervention studies conducted in the period 1992-2022 were included. In all studies, baseline characteristics of patients as well as study end-points were described in relation to a control group i.e., usual care and a group of subjects that received care from a clinical and/or community pharmacist, as well as other health professionals (Intervention). Study outcomes included all-cause hospital 30-day re-admission or emergency room (ER) visits, all-cause hospitalization within >30 days after discharge, specific-cause hospitalization rates, medication adherence and mortality. The secondary outcomes included adverse events and quality of life. Quality assessment was carried out using RoB 2 Risk of Bias Tool. Publication bias across studies was determined using the funnel plot and Egger's regression test.

RESULTS

a total of 34 protocols were included in the review, while the data from 33 trials were included in further quantitative analyses. The heterogeneity between studies was high. Pharmacist-led interventions, usually performed within interprofessional care teams, reduced the rates of 30-day all-cause hospital re-admission (odds ratio, OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; p = 0.03) and all-cause hospitalization >30 days after discharge (OR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.86; p = 0.0001). Subjects hospitalized primarily due to heart failure demonstrated reduced risk of hospital admission within longer periods, i.e., from 60 to 365 days after discharge (OR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.81; p = 0.0002). The rate of all-cause hospitalization was reduced by multidimensional interventions taken by pharmacists: reviews of medicine lists and/or their reconciliation at discharge (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.91; p = 0.014), as well as interventions that were based mainly on patient education and counseling (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.88; p = 0.0047). In conclusion, given that HF patients often have complex treatment regimens and multiple comorbid conditions, our findings highlight the need for greater involvement from skilled clinical and community pharmacists in disease management.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Dose Optimization and Its Associated Factors at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors dose optimizations (ACEIs) are essential to boost the treatment outcome in heart failure patients (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate dose optimization and associated factors of ACEIs among HF patients.

METHOD

An institutional-based retrospective study was conducted on 256 study participants from May 20 to August 30, 2020 in ambulatory care clinic at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. A systematic random sampling method was carried out to select study participants. Data were collected from the patient interview and the review of medical records. Epidata and SPSS version 22 were used for data entry and analysis. A bivariate logistic regression analysis was done to determine the association of independent variables with a dose optimization of ACEIs.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects in the study was 53.82 years with a standard deviation (SD) of 17.067 and more than half of (60.9%) the patients were unable to read and write. Among participants who were receiving ACEIs, only 30.6% were taking an optimal dose. Age ≥65 years (AOR 5.04 (2.81-12.56)) and a dose of furosemide ≥40 mg (AOR, 2.62 (1.28-16.74)) were significantly associated with the suboptimal dose of ACEIs.

CONCLUSION

Only one-third of patients received the optimum dose of ACEIs. Older age and dose of furosemide greater >40 mg were significantly associated with suboptimal dosing of ACEIs. Therefore, more attention must be given to older patients with HF in order to optimize the dose of ACEIs administered.

Treatment optimization of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and associated factors in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have morbidity and mortality benefits in heart failure. Failure to optimize treatment using these medications increases hospitalizations, worsens signs and symptoms of heart failure, and reduces the overall treatment outcome. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to assess the practice of treatment optimization of these medications and associated factors.

RESULTS

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 61 ambulatory heart failure patients, recruited using a convenience sampling technique, from February 25 to May 24, 2016 at the cardiology clinic of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Descriptive, inferential and Kaplan-Meier 'tolerability' analyses were employed. All patients were taking only enalapril as part of their angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment. According to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline, about fourth-fifth (80.3%) of the patients were tolerating to the hypotensive effect of enalapril. The dose of enalapril was timely titrated (every 2-4 weeks) and was optimized for only 11.5 and 27.8% of the patients, respectively. Considering the tolerance, timely titration, and dose optimization, only 3.3% of the overall enalapril treatment was optimized. Multivariate regression results showed that the odds of having timely titration of enalapril for patients who were taking enalapril and calcium channel blockers were almost 20 times [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 21.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-383.16, p < 0.036] more compared to patients who were taking enalapril and β-blockers. A Log Rank Chi Square result showed a 19.42 magnitude of better toleration of enalapril (p < 0.001) for patients who were taking enalapril for more than 1 year compared to less than a year.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a platform for assessment of the treatment optimization practice of enalapril, which remains the pressing priority and found to be poor in the ambulatory setting, despite a better tolerability to the hypotensive effect of enalapril. We call for greater momentum of efforts by health care providers in optimizing the treatment practice to benchmark with other optimization practices.

Pharmacist-led intervention in the multidisciplinary team approach optimizes heart failure medication

We evaluated the impact of pharmacist-led heart failure (HF) drug recommendations during hospitalization for hospitalized patients with HF. Hospitalized patients with HF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were hospitalized before (n = 208, non-intervention group) or after (n = 170, intervention group) the launch of the HF multidisciplinary team (HFMDT) approach with pharmacist-led HF medication optimization. There were no significant group differences in patient background characteristics at admission. Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction who were not on beta blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARB) at admission were significantly more likely to be on beta blockers at the time of discharge in the intervention group (73.3 vs 96.3%, P = 0.027) compared to those in non-intervention group; however, the change in ACE-I/ARB prescriptions was not significant (53.3 vs 63.3%, P = 0.601). The proportion of patients on any drug with recommendations against its use in patients with HF did not change from admission to discharge in the non-intervention group (21.2 vs. 20.2%, P = 0.855), but was significantly reduced in the intervention group (22.9 vs. 12.9%, P = 0.005). There were no group differences in the in-hospital all-cause mortality (non-intervention, 3.4%; intervention, 2.4%; P = 0.761) or length of hospital stay (median: non-intervention, 13 days; intervention, 14 days; P = 0.508). Pharmacist-led HF drug recommendations during hospitalization as part of a HFMDT approach for hospitalized patients with HF can increase beta blocker prescriptions and decrease non-preferred drug prescriptions.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Postdischarge Management Clinic on Medication Adherence

PURPOSE

Disease management programs have been associated with improved adherence to heart failure (HF) medications. However, there remain limited data on the benefit of a comprehensive multidisciplinary HF postdischarge management (PDM) clinic that promptly follows HF-related hospitalization on evidence-based HF medication adherence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an HF-PDM clinic on adherence to evidence-based HF medication therapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients discharged from the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System between 2009 and 2012 with a primary diagnosis of HF. Data from patients who attended the HF-PDM clinic immediately following HF-related hospitalization between 2010 and 2012 were compared with those from historical controls, who did not attend the HF-PDM clinic, from 2009. The main outcome was adherence to evidence-based HF medications during the 90 days after discharge. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered at 90 days after discharge (PDC-90) of ≥0.80. The percentages of patients adherent to each medication were compared between the 2 groups using the χ² test. A logistic regression model adjusted for potential confounding variables was constructed to evaluate the percentages of patients adherent to evidence-based HF medications.

FINDINGS

A total of 277 patients (144 clinic, 133 control) were included in the study. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the clinic was associated with improved medication adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, a twice-daily β-blocker, and aldosterone antagonists compared with controls. The most significant increases were in adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with mean PDC-90 values of 0.84 (control) versus 0.93 (clinic) (P = 0.008) and 90-day adherence rates of 69% (control) versus 87% (clinic) (P = 0.005).

IMPLICATIONS

Care in the multidisciplinary HF-PDM clinic was associated with significant increases in 90-day adherence to evidence-based HF medications in patients who were recently discharged after an HF-related hospitalization.

Assessing the Quality and Comparative Effectiveness of Team-Based Care for Heart Failure: Who, What, Where, When, and How

Team-based or multidisciplinary care may be a potential way to positively impact outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients by improving clinical outcomes, managing patient symptoms, and reducing costs. The multidisciplinary team includes the HF cardiologist, HF nurses, clinical pharmacists, dieticians, exercise specialists, mental health providers, social workers, primary care providers, and additional subspecialty providers. The timing and setting of multidisciplinary care depends on the needs of the patient and the resources available. Multidisciplinary HF teams should be evaluated based on their ability to achieve goals, as well as their potential for sustainability over time.

Development and validation of algorithms for heart failure patient care: a Delphi study

INTRODUCTION

Although heart failure (HF) management is available at primary and secondary care facilities in Malaysia, the optimisation of drug therapy is still suboptimal. Although pharmacists can help bridge the gap in optimising HF therapy, pharmacists in Malaysia currently do not manage and titrate HF pharmacotherapy. The aim of this study was to develop treatment algorithms and monitoring protocols for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers and spironolactone based on extensive literature review for validation and utilization by pharmacists involved in HF management.

METHODS

A Delphi survey involving 32 panellists, from private and government hospitals that provide cardiac services in Malaysia, was conducted to obtain a consensus opinion on the treatment protocols. The panellists completed two rounds of self-administered questionnaires to determine their level of agreement with all the components in the protocols.

RESULTS

Consensus agreement was achieved for most of the sections of the protocols for the four classes of drugs. Panellists' opinions were taken into consideration when amending the components of the protocols that did not achieve consensus opinion. Full consensus agreement was achieved with the second survey conducted, enabling the finalisation of the drug titration protocols.

CONCLUSION

The resulting validated HF titration protocols can be used as a guide for pharmacists when recommending the initiation and titration of HF drug therapy in daily clinical practice. Recommendations should be made in collaboration with the patient's treating physician, with concomitant monitoring of patient's response to the drugs.

Outcomes of medication therapy review in a family medicine clinic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of pharmacist-conducted medication therapy review (MTR) and intervention on the quality of care of patients in a family medicine clinic.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, cohort study.

SETTING

Family medicine clinic in Minnesota during 2000-2001.

PATIENTS

Patients were enrolled in a statewide nonprofit managed care organization; selected patients were seen by a clinical pharmacist.

INTERVENTION

Following MTR, medication-related problems (MRPs) were identified and resolved.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

MRPs identified and resolved, improvement in clinical status, achievement of therapeutic goals, important medication use, and reduction in number of medications.

RESULTS

92 patients were included in the study, with a total of 203 patient encounters. MRPs were identified in 90% of patients, with a total of 250 identified. Overall status of medical conditions improved in 45% of patients, 46% stayed the same, and 9% declined (P < 0.001). Significant improvement in status was found for hypertension (P = 0.007), dyslipidemia (P = 0.002), and asthma (P = 0.011). Significant improvement was seen for aspirin use for myocardial infarction prevention (50% vs. 93%, P = 0.031) and inhaled steroids for asthma (36% vs. 64%, P = 0.031). The number of medications was reduced from an average of 3.92 to 3.04 (P < 0.001) per patient.

CONCLUSION

MTR and intervention by a pharmacist positively affected quality of care in this family medicine clinic.

Economic impact of the reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure treated with enalapril

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of heart failure (HF) is linked to embolic stroke and exacerbation of HF. The rate of new-onset AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and mild to moderate HF enrolled in the SoLVD trials was significantly lower with enalapril than with placebo (5.4% vs 24% over 2.9 years, P < .0001). The objective of this study was to predict economic benefits over 5 and 10 years of reduced AF incidence in patients receiving enalapril for the treatment of HF from a Canadian third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

Consequences of reduced incidence of AF in enalapril-treated patients were modeled using a Markov model. Patients were assigned to 1 health state: no AF, AF, poststroke, or death, and moved from one state to the other according to published incidence rates. It was assumed that most patients with AF would receive warfarin for stroke prevention. Resource use and costs were mostly retrieved from published Canadian studies.

RESULTS

Reduced incidence of AF resulted in savings of 382 dollars and 525 dollars per patient treated with enalapril over 5 and 10 years, respectively, which stemmed mainly from reduced AF hospitalization and less need for warfarin and amiodarone. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that enalapril becomes more cost saving as the baseline risk for embolic stroke in patients with AF increases and the use of warfarin prophylaxis decreases.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced incidence of AF with enalapril leads to significant clinical and economic advantages on top of the already well-established benefits of enalapril for patients with HF.

Impact of the Clinical Pharmacist on Readmission in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND:

Previous studies have reported a positive impact of pharmacists on care of patients with chronic illnesses. The impact of the clinical pharmacist on hospital readmission in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has yet to be evaluated, as of this writing.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the impact of the clinical pharmacist as a direct patient-care team member on cardiac-related readmission in patients admitted to the general cardiology unit with ACS.

METHODS:

A prospective, nonrandomized observational study compared patients who received standard practice care with patients admitted to a service with a clinical pharmacist to provide care at the bedside. Patients admitted to and discharged from the general cardiology unit for ACS were included. The primary endpoint of the study was cardiac-related readmission at 30 days following hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included length of stay and medication utilization. Interventions provided by the clinical pharmacist in the study group were documented.

RESULTS:

Cardiac readmission at 30 days was similar between the groups (p = 0.59%). In the subset of patients with unstable angina, readmission in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (1.3% vs 9.1%; p = 0.04%). Patients in both groups were similarly managed using drug therapy and invasive coronary interventions. The medical staff's rate of acceptance of recommendations provided by the pharmacist was 94.4%. The most common interventions were medication education and identification of indicated therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of pharmacists did not decrease readmission in patients with ACS. The finding of significant reduction in readmission in the subset of patients with unstable angina should be considered “hypothesis generating” for future randomized studies to confirm the results.

Strategies to reduce length of stay and costs associated with decompensated heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical problem in the United States, imposing significant economic burden on the health care system. Despite therapeutic advances, HF-associated morbidity and mortality continue to increase. Compliance with therapeutic guidelines for the management of chronic HF is far from ideal, increasing the likelihood that patients will experience multiple episodes of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during the course of HF disease. Prevention, streamlined inpatient care, effective vasoactive therapy, and initiation of proven long-term therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers, are all targets for improvement. Because of the chronic nature of heart failure, a successful disease management program for ADHF must also include effective outpatient care.

Pharmaceutical care of patients with heart failure

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care programme, involving optimization of drug treatment and intensive education and self-monitoring of patients with heart failure (HF) within the United Arab Emirates (UAE), on a range of clinical and humanistic outcome measures.

METHODS

The study was a randomized, controlled, longitudinal, prospective clinical trial at Al-Ain Hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. Patients were recruited from the general medical wards and from cardiology and medical outpatient clinics. HF patients who fulfilled the entrance criteria, and had no exclusion criteria present, were identified for inclusion in the study. After recruitment, patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention group or control group. Intervention patients received a structured pharmaceutical care service while control patients received traditional services. Patient follow-up took place when patients attended scheduled outpatient clinics (every 3 months). A total of 104 patients in each group completed the trial (12 months). The patients were generally suffering from mild to moderate HF (NYHA Class 1, 29.5%; Class 2, 50.5%; Class 3, 16%; and Class 4, 4%).

RESULTS

Over the study period, intervention patients showed significant (P < 0.05) improvements in a range of summary outcome measures [AUC (95% confidence limits)] including exercise tolerance [2-min walk test: 1607.2 (1474.9, 1739.5) m.month in intervention patients vs. 1403.3 (1256.5, 1549.8) in control patients], forced vital capacity [31.6 (30.8, 32.4) l.month in the intervention patients vs. 27.8 (26.8, 28.9) in control patients], health-related quality of life, as measured by the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire [463.5 (433.2, 493.9) unit.month in intervention patients vs. 637.5 (597.2, 677.7) in control patients; a lower score in this measure indicates better health-related quality of life]. The number of individual patients who reported adherence to prescribed medications was higher (P < 0.05) in the intervention group (85 vs. 35), as was adherence to lifestyle advice (75 vs. 29) at the final assessment (12 months). There was a tendency to have a higher incidence of casualty department visits by intervention patients, but a lower rate of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The research provides clear evidence that the delivery of pharmaceutical care to patients with HF can lead to significant clinical and humanistic benefits.

Health care professionals in a heart failure team

A heart failure team that treats heart failure patients often faces the challenge of managing multiple conditions requiring multiple medications and life style changes in an older patient group. A multidisciplinary team approach can optimally diagnose, carefully review and prescribe treatment, and educate and counsel patients and their families about medication use and life style changes. In this paper the possible role of the pharmacist, dietician, physical therapist, psychologist, primary care provider and social worker in heart failure management is discussed.

Heart Failure Drug Utilization Patterns for Medicaid Patients Before and After a Heart Failure-Related Hospitalization

The authors examined heart failure (HF) drug utilization patterns in Medicaid patients before and after a HF-related hospitalization. This was a retrospective claims analysis of Kansas Medicaid beneficiaries hospitalized for HF between July 1, 2000, and March 31, 2001. HF drugs were tracked 6 months prior and 6 months following the admission. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor doses were compared with target ranges. The cohort of 135 patients had a mean age of 53.6 years and was predominantly female (66.7%) and Caucasian (70.4%) with a high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. Before hospitalization, less than one third of patients were receiving ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers, digoxin, or vasodilators. Following hospitalization, increased utilization was observed for beta blockers, digoxin, and angiotensin receptor blockers, but overall usage remained low. ACE inhibitors and vasodilator use remained constant. ACE-inhibitor doses were below target ranges before and after hospitalization. In this Medicaid cohort, HF-related hospitalizations did not lead to improved HF therapy.

Quality of heart failure care in managed Medicare and Medicaid patients in North Carolina

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers in patients with heart failure (HF) remains low despite the results of clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines that support their use. The quality of HF care in managed Medicare and Medicaid programs in North Carolina participating in a HF quality improvement program was assessed. Managed care plans identified adult patients with 1 inpatient or 3 outpatient claims for HF during 2000. A stratified random sample of 971 Medicare and 642 Medicaid patients' outpatient medical records from 5 plans were reviewed by trained nurse abstractors to obtain data regarding type of HF, demographics, comorbidities, and therapies. Left ventricular function assessment was performed in 88% of patients. Among 494 patients with systolic dysfunction, 86% were appropriately treated with respect to ACE inhibitors (73% prescribed, 13% had a documented contraindication). In contrast, beta-blocker therapy was appropriate in 61% (49% prescribed, 12% contraindication). There were no significant differences in drug use by insurance, gender, race, or age. Ventricular function assessment and ACE inhibitor prescription rates are higher than beta-blocker prescription rates among Medicare and Medicaid managed care patients in North Carolina. Opportunities for improvement remain, particularly for beta-blocker use.

Undertreatment of congestive heart failure in an Australian setting

AIM

Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic heart failure have undergone change in recent years, with beta-blockers and spironolactone shown to reduce mortality when added to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, diuretics and digoxin. The aim of this study was to examine the therapeutic management of heart failure in patients admitted to Tasmania's three major public hospitals, with an assessment of the appropriateness of the therapy according to contemporary published guidelines.

METHODS

An extensive range of clinical and demographic data was retrospectively extracted from the medical records of consecutive adult patients admitted to the medical wards of the hospitals with heart failure, either as a primary diagnosis or as a comorbidity, during a 6-month period in late 1999-early 2001.

RESULTS

The 450 patients (57% females) had a mean age of 77.8 +/- 10.2 years, and were being treated with a median of seven drugs on hospital admission. The percentages of patients being treated with the major drugs of interest were: ACE inhibitors (50%), beta-blockers (22%), spironolactone (15%), digoxin (24%), loop diuretics (65%) and angiotensin-II receptor antagonists (8%). Almost 10% were taking a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Less than one-half the patients who were receiving an ACE inhibitor were taking a target dose for heart failure. There were no significant differences in the pattern of drug use between the three hospitals. Underuse of heart failure medications was most pronounced in women and elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that current guidelines for the treatment of heart failure are still not being reflected in clinical practice. The relatively low use of drugs shown to improve survival in heart failure is of concern and warrants educational intervention.

Evidence of the economic benefit of clinical pharmacy services: 1996-2000

We sought to summarize and assess original evaluations of the economic impact of clinical pharmacy services published from 1996-2000, and to provide recommendations and methodologic considerations for future research. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify articles that were then blinded and randomly assigned to reviewers who confirmed inclusion and abstracted key information. Results were compared with those of a similar review of literature published from 1988-1995. In the 59 included articles, the studies were conducted across a variety of practice sites that consisted of hospitals (52%), community pharmacies and clinics (41%), health maintenance organizations (3%), and long-term or intermediate care facilities (3%). They focused on a broad range of clinical pharmacy services such as general pharmacotherapeutic monitoring (47%), target drug programs (20%), disease management programs (10%), and patient education or cognitive services (10%). Compared with the studies of the previous review, a greater proportion of evaluations were conducted in community pharmacies or clinics, and the types of services evaluated tended to be more comprehensive rather than specialized. Articles were categorized by type of evaluation: 36% were considered outcome analyses, 24% full economic analyses, 17% outcome descriptions, 15% cost and outcome descriptions, and 8% cost analyses. Compared with the studies of the previous review, a greater proportion of studies in the current review used more rigorous study designs. Most studies reported positive financial benefits of the clinical pharmacy service evaluated. In 16 studies, a benefit:cost ratio was reported by the authors or was able to be calculated by the reviewers (these ranged from 1.7:1-17.0:1, median 4.68:1). The body of literature from this 5-year period provides continued evidence of the economic benefit of clinical pharmacy services. Although the quality of study design has improved, whenever possible, future evaluations of this type should incorporate methodologies that will further enhance the strength of evidence of this literature and the conclusions that may be drawn from it.

Clinical impact of renin-angiotensin system blockade: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors vs. angiotensin receptor antagonists

Clinical trials have proved that blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) offers primary and secondary protection of the cardiovascular system, brain, and kidneys. Drugs that interrupt the RAAS do so by several diverse mechanisms but it remains to be fully proved whether these mechanistic differences are associated with meaningful differences in clinical outcomes. This review summarizes current information about the basic mechanisms of action of three classes of anti-RAAS drugs: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, combined ACE-neutral endopeptidase inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor antagonists as well as results of major clinical outcome trials with these agents. Basic and clinical science information is then blended with insights from the clinical pharmacology of anti-RAAS drugs to address four current controversies in clinical medicine: whether ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists are interchangeable, optimal dosing of available agents, potential justification of ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor antagonist combinations, and first-line use of anti-RAAS drugs in antihypertensive therapy.

From pharmacogenomics to improved patient outcomes: angiotensin I-converting enzyme as an example

Here we report the utility of a molecular epidemiologic approach for common, polygenic diseases. Since 1992, the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) deletion/deletion (D/D) genotype has been linked to several cardiovascular diseases, including diabetic nephropathy. Earlier, the ACE D/D genotype had been associated with excess tissue ACE activity. We have observed an association of the ACE D/D genotype with a large number of common diseases, including chronic renal failure due to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or hypertension, hypertensive peripheral vascular disease, and emphysema [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)]. ACE inhibitors have been in clinical use since 1977 and have a well-known safety record. Armed with the knowledge that ACE overactivity was associated with their disease, we gave what was intended to be a tissue ACE-inhibitory dose of a hydrophobic ACE inhibitor to 800 Caucasian and African-American male patients with hypertension and 200 Caucasian and African-American male patients with chronic renal failure, over a period of 3 years. We here report their outcomes, which include those of two patients with end-stage hypertensive peripheral vascular disease and one patient with end-stage emphysema (COPD). As a group, the outcomes are superior to what is available in the literature. This experience suggests the power of pharmacogenomics to improve clinical outcomes for common diseases safely, quickly, and inexpensively, if effective drugs already exist.

Long-term administration of angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor improves the outcome of chronic heart failure in senile patients

One hundred and sixteen senile patients (older than 65 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF) were analyzed retrospectively in order to verify if old patients with CHF would benefit from long-term (one year) angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) treatment. The frequency of drugs (including ACEI, digitalis and diuretic) used was stratified into four degrees accordingly. Development of the CHF was scored with regard to relapse rate and severity of this disease. Stepwise regression analysis was applied to explore the relationship between the scored outcome of CHF and the frequency of individual drug administration. A significant relationship of the scored outcome of CHF to the frequency of ACEI usage but not to digitalis nor to diuretics was found (partial coefficient of the correlation r = 0.42, P = 0.002). It was concluded that the long-term administration of ACEI improves the outcome of CHF in senile patients.

Dose response of ACE inhibitors: implications of the SECURE trial

The choice of the appropriate dosage of ACE inhibitor in clinical practice is an important one. The available evidence suggests that in chronic heart failure as well as in chronic coronary artery disease, high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor are more effective than low ones. The current recommended clinical approach is to target ACE inhibitor dosing regimens to be similar to those used in the clinical trials, which demonstrated mortality and morbidity benefits. When titrated appropriately, ACE inhibitors are generally well tolerated and target doses can be achieved and maintained in the majority of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, with or without heart failure.