The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz-Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions

Structural and Hemodynamic Analyses of Different Stent Structures in Curved and Stenotic Coronary Artery

Coronary artery stenting is commonly used for the treatment of coronary stenosis, and different stent structures indeed have various impacts on the stress distribution within the plaque and artery as well as the local hemodynamic environment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of different stent structures by characterizing the mechanical parameters after coronary stenting. Six stent structures including three commercially-shaped stents (Palmaz-Schatz-shaped, Xience Prime-shaped, and Cypher-shaped) and three author-developed stents (C-Rlink, C-Rcrown, and C-Astrut) implanted into a curved stenotic coronary artery were investigated. Structural analyses of the balloon-stent-plaque-artery system were first performed, and then followed by hemodynamic analyses. The results showed that among the three commercially-shaped stents, the Palmaz-Schatz-shaped had the least stent dogboning and recoiling, corresponding to the greatest maximum plastic strain and the largest diameter change, nevertheless, it induced the highest maximum von Mises stress on plaque, arterial intima and media. From the viewpoint of hemodynamics, the Palmaz-Schatz-shaped displayed smaller areas of adverse low wall shear stress (<0.5 Pa), low time-averaged wall shear stress (<0.5 Pa), and high oscillating shear index (>0.1). Compared to the Cypher-shaped, the C-Rcrown and C-Astrut had smaller recoiling, greater maximum plastic stain and larger diameter change, which indicated the improved mechanical performance of the Cypher-shaped stent. Moreover, both C-Rcrown and C-Astrut exhibited smaller areas of adverse low wall shear stress, and low time-averaged wall shear stress, but only the C-Rcrown displayed a smaller area of adverse high oscillating shear index. The present study evaluated and compared the performance of six different stents deployed inside a curved artery, and could be potentially utilized as a guide for the selection of suitable commercially-shaped stent for clinical application, and to provide an approach to improve the performance of the commercial stents.

Stents: material, surface texture and design, in theory and practice

Intravascular stenting has become standard practice in cardiology and interventional radiology. As part of their daily routine, interventional therapists have to choose from more than 50 different coronary stents for the optimal treatment of patients. Striking advances in biomedical engineering have triggered the production of numerous new and improved stent models, whose theoretical benefits have not yet been confirmed by large-scale clinical trials. Selecting appropriate stents for individual patients is frequently subject to the personal and, therefore, subjective experience of the interventional therapist. This paper reviews different stent materials and designs used in current trials and clinical practice. The theoretical benefits of individual parameters are discussed and correlated with up-to-date clinical results, particularly with a view to considering their favourable impact on intervention outcomes.

Histopathologic evaluation of a novel‐design nitinol stent: the Biflex stent

BACKGROUND

Optimalization and improvement in stent material, stent design and deployment may alleviate the problem of restenosis after stenting. The Biflex stent is a novel-design stent made of nitinol; the vascular response after deployment in rabbit iliac arteries was evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Normocholesterolemic New Zealand white rabbits (n = 8) were used. Iliac arteries were randomized to receive either a stainless steel control stent or a nitinol stent and rabbits were euthanized at 30 days after implantation. All animals survived and there were no adverse events. Vessels were harvested and prepared for histopathologic analysis and histomorphometry. Stents were well opposed to the vessel wall and thrombi were absent. The lumen area and the area within the internal elastic lamina were significantly larger in the nitinol stent group as opposed to the control group (3.8 +/- 0.1 vs 3.3 +/- 0.1 mm, p = 0.009 and 4.6 +/- 0.1 vs 4.1 +/- 0.2 mm, p = 0.03, respectively). There were no differences in injury score, neointimal area, medial area, area within the external elastic lamina and amount of inflammatory cells. Staining for alpha-smooth muscle cell actin and endothelium did not show any differences between the two groups as assessed semiquantitatively.

CONCLUSION

This nitinol stent with a novel design demonstrated acceptable biocompatibility in iliac arteries of normocholesterolemic rabbits with minimal foreign-body reaction and minimal neointimal formation.

Coronary stents: a materials perspective

The objective of this review is to describe the suitability of different biomaterials as coronary stents. This review focuses on the following topics: (1) different materials used for stents, (2) surface characteristics that influence stent-biology interactions, (3) the use of polymers in stents, and (4) drug-eluting stents, especially those that are commercially available.

A Model System to Assess Key Vascular Responses to Biomaterials

PURPOSE

To establish a reproducible laboratory test to evaluate prospective vascular biomaterials with respect to their thromboinflammatory properties by examining fibrinogen, platelet, and monocyte binding. Endothelial migration onto these surfaces was used as an index of vascular healing.

METHODS

To evaluate biomaterials for potential thrombogenicity and inflammation, binding assays of radiolabeled human fibrinogen, platelets, and monocytes were performed on standard pieces of vascular biomaterials, including metals and polymeric and ceramic-coated materials. Using an established in vitro endothelial cell migration model, the relative migration rate of cultured human aortic endothelial cells onto these vascular biomaterials was measured and compared. The fibrinogen, platelet, and monocyte binding results were combined along with the migration results to create an overall score of biocompatibility.

RESULTS

A significant direct relation of platelet and monocyte binding to the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen was observed. In contrast, migration rates of cultured human aortic endothelial cells onto the same biomaterial surfaces were found to be inversely related the amount of bound fibrinogen. Among the materials tested, stainless steel received the highest score of biocompatibility, while turbostratic carbon scored the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrinogen, platelet, and monocyte binding levels, as well as endothelial migration rates onto vascular material surfaces, provide a basis for evaluating thrombogenicity, inflammatory potential, and endothelialization in the laboratory prior to in vivo testing.

Quantitative assessment of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in native coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) reduce angiographic restenosis in patients with focal, native coronary artery stenoses. This study evaluated the usefulness of SESs in complex native-vessel lesions at high risk for restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Angiographic follow-up at 240 days was obtained in 701 patients with long (15- to 25-mm) lesions in small-diameter (2.5- to 3.5-mm) native vessels who were randomly assigned to treatment with SESs or bare-metal stents (BMSs) in the SIRIUS trial. Quantitative angiographic measurements of minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis were obtained within the treated segment, within the stent, and within its 5-mm proximal and distal edges. Patients treated with SESs had lower rates of binary (>50% diameter stenosis) angiographic restenosis within the segment (8.9% versus 36.3% with the BMS; P<0.001) and within the stent (3.2% versus 35.4% with the BMS; P<0.001). SESs were associated with significantly less late lumen loss within the treated segment, within the stent, and within its 5-mm proximal and distal edges (all P<0.001). The reduction of restenosis with the SES was consistent in patients at risk for restenosis, including those with small vessels, long lesions, and diabetes mellitus. The frequency of late aneurysms was similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BMSs, SESs reduced angiographic late lumen loss within the stent and its adjacent 5-mm margins in patients with complex native-vessel lesions.

Randomized comparison of the coil-design Crossflex and the tubular NIR stent

The purpose of this study was to compare the angiographic outcome of implantation of the coil-design Crossflex stent with the tubular NIR stent for treatment of coronary artery stenoses. Two hundred twenty-three patients with one genuine coronary artery lesion were randomized to implantation with a 15 mm Crossflex stent (n = 112) or a 16 mm NIR stent (n = 111). The patients had angiographic follow-up after 6 months. Primary endpoint was minimal luminal diameter (MLD) after 6 months. There was a similar clinical outcome in the two groups. At 6-month follow-up, the MLD was significantly lower in the Crossflex group (1.94 +/- 0.79 mm) than in the NIR group (2.37 +/- 0.84 mm; P < 0.001). Early gain was the same in the two groups. Late loss and percent diameter stenoses were significantly higher in the Crossflex group. The binary restenoses rate was 26% and 17% in the Crossflex and the NIR groups, respectively (P = NS). The coil-design Crossflex stent was found to be inferior to the tubular NIR stent concerning late loss and MLD at 6-month follow-up.

Low restenosis rate of the NIR coronary stent: results of the Danish multicenter stent study (DANSTENT)--a randomized trial comparing a first-generation stent with a second-generation stent

BACKGROUND

Larger studies evaluating the angiographic results of second-generation stents are scarce. The objectives of this study were to assess current standards of angiographic and clinical outcomes after implantation of the second-generation stainless steel stent, NIR (Medinol Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel), and to compare the outcomes with those of the first-generation Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent (Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ).

METHODS

Patients having coronary artery lesions that could be covered by a stent of 15 mm in length were randomly assigned to receive the NIR or the PS. Procedural success, 6-month angiographic findings, and 1-year clinical outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

In 424 patients included in the study, the overall procedural success rate was high (NIR 98%, PS 99%, P =.90). Follow-up angiography was conducted in 91% of the patients. The overall rate of angiographic restenosis was low in both groups (NIR 9.9%, PS 12.6%, P =.35). We found a low restenosis rate in vessels with a minimal lumen diameter >3.1 mm after the procedure, particularly in the NIR group (<6%). The rate of target lesion revascularization after 1 year did not differ (NIR 12%, PS 10%, P =.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The angiographic and clinical outcomes after implantation of the second-generation stainless steel stent were not significantly better than those of the first-generation stent. The low restenosis rates, particularly in patients with the largest minimal lumen diameters after stent implantation, warrants circumspection when planning the evaluation of newer stent technologies that aim to further reduce coronary restenosis.