Analysis of indications for surgical closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect without associated aortic cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation

Comparison of ADO-II percutaneous occlusion and traditional surgery in the treatment of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects in children

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADO-II percutaneous occlusion and traditional open-chest surgery for treating doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD) in children.

Methods

The clinical data of 151 children with dcVSD treated at Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital between July 2019 and May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a transcatheter group (percutaneous occlusion) and a surgical group (open-chest repair) on the basis of the treatment method used. Key evaluation metrics included procedural success rates, complication rates, and perioperative management parameters.

Results

Occlusion technical success was 94.9% (37/39) in the interventional sample of 39 patients. The 112 surgical patients had a 100% technical success rate. Three interventional patients had sinus rhythm before discharge, and 2 of 18 surgical patients had residual right bundle branch block at the last follow-up. The mild aortic valve prolapse of 115 individuals (76.2%) improved to varied degrees postoperatively. Of 96 individuals with preoperative aortic regurgitation, 83 exhibited no change, 49 improved, 17 developed new regurgitation, and two worsened. The two groups differed significantly in postoperative hospital stay, time to independent ambulation, operative time, mechanical ventilation, blooding amount, Blood transfusion volume, Fever within 72 h after operation, pulmonary infections, intravenous nutrition, antibiotic use, and hospitalization cost (all p < 0.05). There no serious problems were recorded the transcatheter group, including device dislodgement, cardiac or vascular perforation, death, or hemolysis. In the surgical group, one patient had residual shunting reoperation and another had infective endocarditis.

Conclusion

Children with dcVSD can recover faster and safer using ADO-II percutaneous occlusion, which is minimally invasive and inexpensive. It can be the first-line treatment for selected patients.

Percutaneous Device Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects Associated with Aortic Valve Prolapse and Aortic Regurgitation

The progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) in perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pVSD) remains uncertain; research indicates that the accompanying AR tends to worsen over time. There is controversy surrounding the percutaneous closure of defects in patients with pVSD associated with aortic valve prolapse (AVP) and AR. Our research focused on transcatheter closure for pVSD accompanied by AVP, AR, and septal aneurysm, with the aim of addressing challenges through device placement in aneurysmal tissue to eliminate the Venturi effect. We studied 44 patients with AVP, AR, and septal aneurysm who underwent transcatheter device closure. The mean age and weight were 10.5 ± 4.0 years and 36.0 ± 15.1 kg, respectively. Transcatheter closure was attempted in 44 patients. One case (2.3%) was referred to surgery, while the procedure was successfully completed in 43 out of 44 patients (97.7%). Early complications were minimal. Embolization of the device to the pulmonary artery was observed in one patient; upon re-evaluation, significant aneurysm tissue damage was detected, leading to a referral for surgery. Additionally, three patients (6.9%) developed permanent incomplete right bundle branch block (iRBBB). The median follow-up time was 43 months. During the follow-up period, AR progressed in only 1(2.3%) patient, while AR in 7(16.3%) patients regressed markedly. Follow-up assessments demonstrated high rates of complete occlusion; the rates at immediate, 24 h, 6 months, and 1 year were assessed as 72, 83.7, 93, and 95.3%, respectively. Transcatheter device closure of pVSD offers a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and alternative treatment option for patients with pVSD associated with AVP and AR.

A Retrospective Study in Occluding Sub-arterial Ventricular Septal Defect

To assess the safety and effectiveness of utilizing eccentric occlusion for the treatment of sub-arterial ventricular septal defects, we performed a retrospective study on the classification and analysis of relevant cases. A total of 105 patients with a minimally invasive incision were enrolled in this study, from April 2018 to September 2022. All patients underwent treatment of transthoracic sub-arterial ventricular septal defect occlusion. We analyzed the causes of closure failure, indication, and complication. Briefly, the closure device was successfully implanted in 78 cases (74.2%) with a mean age of 31.4 ± 31.8 months, VSD size of 4.3 ± 0.9 mm, and device size of 6.0 ± 1.1 mm. However, 27 cases (25.8%) required cardiopulmonary bypass due to failure of occlusion. The reasons for failure included 13 cases with worsened aortic regurgitation, two cases with worsened aortic valve prolapse, one case with worsened mitral regurgitation, eight cases with significant residual shunt, and three cases with deviated occlusion morphology. During the 1-36-month follow-up visit, no cases experienced displacement of the eccentric umbrella, shedding, or arrhythmia. All residual shunts resolved during the visit. We concluded that occlusion for sub-arterial VSD has sufficient security and feasibility, under the strict control of surgical indications, appropriate choice of occluder and precise perioperative management.

Managing uncertainty in decision-making of common congenital cardiac defects

Decision-making in congenital cardiac care, although sometimes appearing simple, may prove challenging due to lack of data, uncertainty about outcomes, underlying heuristics, and potential biases in how we reach decisions. We report on the decision-making complexities and uncertainty in management of five commonly encountered congenital cardiac problems: indications for and timing of treatment of subaortic stenosis, closure or observation of small ventricular septal defects, management of new-onset aortic regurgitation in ventricular septal defect, management of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery in an asymptomatic patient, and indications for operating on a single anomalously draining pulmonary vein. The strategy underpinning each lesion and the indications for and against intervention are outlined. Areas of uncertainty are clearly delineated. Even in the presence of "simple" congenital cardiac lesions, uncertainty exists in decision-making. Awareness and acceptance of uncertainty is first required to facilitate efforts at mitigation. Strategies to circumvent uncertainty in these scenarios include greater availability of evidence-based medicine, larger datasets, standardised clinical assessment and management protocols, and potentially the incorporation of artificial intelligence into the decision-making process.

Transfemoral Occlusion of Doubly Committed Subarterial Ventricular Septal Defect Using the Amplatzer Duct Occluder-II in Children

Backgrounds

The traditional treatment of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD) is open-heart surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of transcatheter closure of small dcVSD using Amplatzer duct occluder-II (ADO-II) in children.

Methods

Between January 2016 and April 2021, 24 children (17 male and 7 female patients) with small dcVSD who received transfemoral closure with ADO-II were enrolled retrospectively. All of their available clinical and follow-up data were evaluated.

Results

The patients' median age was 3.2 years (1.6–12.6 years, 4.2 ± 3.1 years) and body weight was 13.3 kg (10.0–38.5 kg, 16.5 ± 7.7 kg). Left ventricular angiography showed that the median dcVSD size was 2.0 mm (1.5–3.5 mm, 2.1 ± 0.6 mm). The device was successfully implanted in 23 patients (95.8%), and one patient failed to be closed because of the underestimation of defect size due to preoperative aortic valve prolapse, with 16 patients by the antegrade approach and eight patients by retrograde approach. The diameters of the device used were 3/4, 4/4, and 5/4 mm. The median operative time was 40.0 min (20.0–75.0 min, 41.7 ± 13.7 min), and the median fluoroscopic time was 5.0 min (3.0–25.0 min, 6.8 ± 5.0 min). With a follow-up duration of 1+ to 45+ months, only 1 patient presented with new-onset mild aortic regurgitation (AR).

Conclusion

Transfemoral closure of small dcVSD with ADO-II is technically feasible and safe in the selected children. However, the development or worsening of AR requires long-term follow-up.

Early Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Prevents the Progression of Aortic Regurgitation: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

According to current short-term evidence, ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure should be performed as early as possible after aortic regurgitation (AR) diagnosis in pediatric patients to prevent AR progression. However, long-term follow-up data are lacking. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the long-term follow-up (≥ 10 years) of patients who underwent VSD closure as early as possible after AR diagnosis and to evaluate whether early VSD closure prevents progression of AR. This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 patients with VSD and AR who had undergone VSD closure at a median age of 2.9 years, with a median waiting period from AR diagnosis to VSD closure of 3.4 months and follow-up of a median 13.1 years (interquartile range 10.0-15.8 years). The preoperative degree of AR was trivial in 25 patients, mild in 15, and moderate in 2. Of the 33 patients followed up for ≥ 10 years, none required aortic valve replacement and there was no incidence of mortality. The degree of AR improved or did not change, except in 1 patient. The size of the VSD (odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.18; p = 0.33), time from diagnosis to surgery (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.000-1.001; p = 0.657), and age at the time of surgery (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.998-1.004; p = 0.452) were not predictive of persistent postoperative AR. Therefore, VSD closure performed as early as possible after AR diagnosis could successfully prevent AR progression in patients with less than moderate preoperative AR, eliminating the need for aortic valve replacement and valvuloplasty.

Postoperative Aortic Regurgitation in Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect: Determinants of Outcome

Aortic cusp prolapse is an acquired complication and usually precedes the development of aortic regurgitation (AR) in unoperated outflow ventricular septal defect (VSD). However, its impact on postoperative AR-progression is unknown. 161 patients with outflow-VSD and AR who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2012 were studied retrospectively. 31 patients without prolapse (group-I), 87 with only right coronary cusp (RCC) (group-II), 43 with noncoronary cusp (NCC) prolapse (group-III: 23 only NCC (IIIa), 20 both NCC-RCC (IIIb)) were followed postoperatively for a mean 6.05 ± 2.4 years (range 3-12 years). Moderate or severe-AR was present in 4.2%, 36.8%, 52.2% and 80% preoperatively; in 3.2%, 10.3%, 39.1% and 30% patients at follow-up in group-I, II, IIIa, and IIIb, respectively. Although freedom from significant-AR (moderate or severe AR) or aortic valve replacement (AVR) at 10 years was lesser in subaortic-VSD than subpulmonic-VSD (64.3 ± 7.5% vs 87.9 ± 3.6%; P = 0.02), the difference was not significant when compared within prolapse groups (80 ± 8% vs 88.7 ± 4.0%, P = 0.28 in group-II; 40.7 ± 11.8 vs 70 ± 14.5%, P = 0.48 in group-III). The significant-AR or AVR free survival in patients with trivial or mild preoperative-AR was not significantly different between prolapse groups (98.2 ± 1.8% vs 75 ± 21.7% in group-II and III respectively; P = 0.85). However, in those with moderate or severe preoperative-AR it was significantly lesser in group-III than II (30.1 ± 9.8% vs 65.6 ± 8.4%, respectively; P = 0.04). Group-III, compare to group-II, had 3.28 and 5.24-time risk of development of significant-AR or requirement of AVR, respectively. Prolapse of NCC alone or in addition to RCC prolapse has unfavourable impact on the postoperative outcomes, especially in subaortic-VSD after development of more than mild AR preoperatively.

Three Decades of Follow-up After Surgical Closure of Subarterial Ventricular Septal Defect

We determined the occurrence of aortic regurgitation (AR), AR progression and risk factors in patients followed up for up to three decades after closure of subarterial VSD. We reviewed the outcomes of 86 patients categorized into three groups: group I comprised 37 patients without AR and had VSD closure alone, group II comprised 40 patients with AR and had VSD closure without aortic valvoplasty, and group III comprised 9 patients with AR and required both VSD closure and aortic valvoplasty. Patients were followed up for 18.9 ± 7.3 years (median 19.5 years, range 3.5-36.6). At latest follow up, 54.7% (47/86) of patients had AR. The prevalence of progression of AR from any one grade to the next one higher was 37.2% (32/86). Freedom from AR progression was 75.6%, 52.1%, and 22.2% at 20 years of follow-up for groups I, II and III, respectively (p < 0.05). On the other hand, progression to moderate to severe AR occurred only in 4.7% (4/86). Group I and II patients were free from progression to significant AR, while only 33.3% of group III patients were free from progression on follow-up (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that severity of preoperative AR was the significant risk factor for persistence and progression of postoperative AR after VSD closure. In conclusion, aortic regurgitation is common and may progress even after surgical repair of subarterial VSD. Severity of preoperative AR is the most significant predictor of persistence and progression of AR after surgical closure of subarterial VSD.

Long-term outcomes after conventional surgical repair versus perventricular device occlusion for doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects: a propensity score matched study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of perventricular device occlusion and surgical repair for doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect using propensity score matched analysis because previous comparative studies were limited by differences in the baseline characteristics.

METHODS

We reviewed inpatients with isolated doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect aged <18 years who underwent surgical repair or device occlusion between January 2011 and December 2017. Propensity score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 336 patients underwent surgical repair; 99 underwent device occlusion. After matching, the repair group included 164 patients, whereas the device group had 91 patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. The median follow-up periods were 46 and 58 months for the device and repair groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the rates of cumulative adverse events in the 2 groups (7.9% vs 5.5%; P = 0.61). The repair group required longer periods of hospitalization (P = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (P = 0.016). No grade 3 or higher valvular regurgitation or high-degree atrioventricular block events were observed. All patients were in sinus rhythm at the last follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect, compared with conventional repair, perventricular device occlusion has comparable efficacy and safety, less invasiveness in terms of time in the hospital and on mechanical ventilation and avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass.

A meta-analysis of perventricular device closure of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects

Background

To investigate the safety and efficacy of perventricular device closure of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects (dcsVSDs).

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies in English that focused on perventricular device closure of dcsVSDs and were published up to the end of September 2019. We used a random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates of the success and complication rates.

Results

A total of 9 publications including 459 patients with dcsVSDs were included. The median follow-up duration ranged from 2 months to 5 years, with the mean age of patients ranging from 6.1 months to 4.5 years. The pooled estimate of the overall success rate of device closure in the 9 studies was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.93, I² = 26.5%, P = 0.208). Further meta-regression analysis indicated no significant correlation between the success rate and the following factors: publication year, sample size, study type, mean age, mean weight, mean VSD size, and ratio of device size/weight. The pooled rate of postoperative aortic regurgitation was 0.045 (95% CI: 0.018–0.071, I² = 50.96%, P = 0.000). The pooled rate of follow-up aortic regurgitation (AR) was 0.001 (95% CI, − 0.003-0.004, I² = 63.00%, P = 0.009.) The pooled estimated rate of severe intraoperative complications was 0.106 (0.073–0.140, I² = 70.7%, P = 0.208). Postoperative and follow-up complications were rare. No occurrence of a complete atrioventricular block was reported up to the last follow-up visit.

Conclusions

Perventricular device closure may be an alternative to conventional surgical repair in selected patients with dcsVSDs. The success rate was stable regarding the publication year and sample size, suggesting a relatively short learning curve and the technique’s potential for application.

Incidence of Aortic Regurgitation in Association with Type of Ventricular Septal Defects and its Immediate and Intermediate Outcome after Surgical Closure

Introduction Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is one of the more common congenital heart defects, and aortic regurgitation (AR) is its major complication if it remains unrepaired. We aim to determine the AR incidence in various types of VSD, its immediate and intermediate six to 12-month post-VSD repair outcomes of AR. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of all children aged 18 years or younger who were diagnosed with single VSD at our institution from 2016 to 2018. VSD was classified according to its location and relation to the tricuspid annulus and semilunar valve. AR severity grading was done according to the American Society of Echocardiography, and vena contracta width (VC) was taken as the main parameter for severity. We defined trivial-to-mild AR as VC width less than 0.3 cm, moderate AR was 0.3-0.6 cm VC width, and severe AR was VC width of more than 0.6 cm. Immediate and intermediate outcomes of surgical closure, such as residual VSD and AR, were observed. Results One hundred ninety patients with isolated single VSD were included in the study. Of those, 114 patients had perimembranous VSD (60.0%), 64 patients had muscular VSD (33.7%), and 12 patients had supracristal VSD (6.3%). The median age of our study cohort was six months, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Aortic valve prolapse (28.9%; n = 55) and AR (23.2%; n = 44) were the most common findings on echocardiographic evaluation of VSD patients. Most cases of VSD with AR had trivial-to-mild AR, (68.2%; n = 30). AR was most commonly seen in supracristal VSD (83.3%; n = 10) followed by perimembranous VSD (28.9%; n = 33). VSD closed spontaneously in 34 patients (17.9%) and 98 patients (51.6%) patients underwent surgery. Residual VSD after surgical closure was present in 57.1% (56) and 17.3% (17) of the patients immediate postoperatively and six- to 12-month postoperative follow-up, respectively. Similarly, residual AR after surgical closure of VSD was present in 32.7% (32) and 15.3% (15) of the patients immediate postoperatively and six- to 12-month postoperative follow-up, respectively. Conclusion The incidence of AR with VSD was very high in our study; AR was most commonly associated with supracristal VSD. After surgical repair, mild AR decreased with time. Early corrective surgery of VSD can prevent this complication and help improve outcomes.

Ventricular mechanics after repair of subarterial and perimembranous VSDs

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest impaired biventricular function in adults late after repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD). We assessed and compared right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) mechanics in adolescents and adults after surgical closure of doubly committed subarterial and perimembranous VSDs.

METHODS

A total of 75 subjects were studied: 29 patients after subarterial VSD repair (group I), 17 patients after perimembranous VSD repair (group II) and 29 age-matched controls (group III). RV and LV mechanics were assessed using tissue Doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography, while RV outflow systolic function was quantified by systolic excursion and fractional shortening (FS).

RESULTS

Compared with group III, groups I and II had significantly reduced tricuspid annular systolic and diastolic velocities, isovolumic myocardial acceleration, RV global longitudinal systolic and diastolic deformation parameters and RV outflow systolic excursion (all P < .05). Group I, but not II, had reduced RV outflow FS (P = .008) and the lowest global LV longitudinal systolic strain (P = .008) and systolic strain rate (P = .014). In group I, postoperative aortic regurgitation was associated with lower LV longitudinal systolic strain (P = .009) and early diastolic strain rate (P = .002), while right bundle branch block was associated with lower RV systolic strain rate (P = .048). As a group, RV outflow excursion (P < .001) and FS (P = .001) were correlated with LV global systolic strain.

CONCLUSION

Adolescents and adults late after repair of subarterial and perimembranous VSDs show impairment of RV systolic and diastolic myocardial deformation. The RV outflow function and LV systolic deformation appear to be worse after repair of subarterial defects.

Perventricular device closure of doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defects via a left infra-axillary approach

BACKGROUND

This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of perventricular device closure of a doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defect (dcVSD) through a left infra-axillary approach.

METHOD

Forty-five patients, with a dcVSD of less than 8 mm in diameter, were enrolled in this study. The pericardium was exposed and opened through a left infra-axillary mini-incision. Two parallel purse-string sutures were placed on the right ventricle outflow tract and under transesophageal echocardiography guidance, a delivery sheath loaded with the device was inserted into the right ventricle and advanced through the defect into the left ventricle. The device, connected to a delivery cable, was then deployed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients achieved successful device closure. In four patients, the device failed to occlude the VSD due to device dislodgement, device-related aortic regurgitation, and residual shunts, and open surgical repair was required. The mean dcVSD diameter was 4.5 ± 1.0 mm (range, 3.0-8.0 mm). The implanted device size was 6.0 ± 1.5 mm (range, 4-10 mm). All patients were implanted with an eccentric device. The mean intracardiac manipulation time was 20.9 ± 7.1 min (range, 9-45 min). The procedure time was 62.5 ± 19.5 min (range 34-105 min). There were no severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Perventricular device closure of a dcVSD through a left infra-axillary approach is feasible, safe, and efficacious in selected patients with dcVSD.

Measurement of Aortic Valve Coaptation and Effective Height Using Echocardiography in Patients with Ventricular Septal Defects and Aortic Valve Prolapse

Decreased coaptation height in adults has been identified as a marker of early valve failure. We evaluated aortic valve coaptation and effective height in healthy children and in children with a ventricular septal defect (VSD) with aortic cusp prolapse (ACP), using echocardiography. We included 45 subjects with VSD with ACP, 27 did not develop aortic regurgitation (AR) by ACP and 18 developed AR by ACP, and 83 healthy children as controls. Aortic root anatomy was estimated using the parasternal long-axis view. We measured the diameter of aortic valve (AV), coaptation height (CH), and effective height (EH) of the aortic valve. We defined the ACH (CH/AV ratio) and AEH (EH/AV ratio) indices as follows: [Formula: see text]. There were significant differences in ACH and AEH between the groups (control vs VSD with ACP vs VSD with ACP and AR, median ACH [%], 35.1 vs 32.0 vs 22.1; median AEH [%], 52.0 vs 48.0 vs 34.4, respectively; P < 0.01]). Intra-cardiac repair (ICR) was performed in 15 cases. Significant increases were observed in ACH and AEH before and after ICR (median ACH [%], before: 27.0, after: 32.7, P < 0.05; median AEH (%), before 38.5, after 45.8, P < 0.05). Measurement of ACH and AEH may allow direct and non-invasive assessment of the severity of VSD with ACP, which could aid clinicians in determining the need and timing for surgical intervention.

Aortic Regurgitation with Ventricular Septal Defect in the Young

This study was carried out to assess the outcome in patients who had aortic valve replacement compared to those who underwent aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation associated with a ventricular septal defect. Of 300 patients undergoing ventricular septal defect closure between May 1990 and December 2003, 36 (12%) had moderate to severe aortic regurgitation; 7 underwent concomitant aortic valve repair and 29 had aortic valve replacement. The mean age of these 36 patients was 17.72 ± 6.84 years, and 69% were male. Follow-up was 8.20 ± 4.97 years in the valve replacement group and 4.1 ± 0.8 years in the valve repair group. The freedom from re-operation after valve repair was 76% after 4 years. After one year of follow-up in 35 patients, 27 were in New York Heart Association class I (77%) and 8 were in class II (23%). After 8 years, 12/21 (57%) patients were in class I, 5 (24%) in class II, and 2 (10%) in class III. Of 22 patients who had a dilated left ventricle, 15 regained normal left ventricular function and volume. Valve repair is preferred, but increasing age makes valve replacement a better alternative.

Transthoracic Subarterial Ventricular Septal Defect Occlusion Using a Minimally Invasive Incision

BACKGROUND

This study sought to investigate the feasibility of transthoracic occlusion of a subarterial ventricular septal defect using a minimally invasive incision.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and June 2014, we performed transthoracic subarterial ventricular septal defect occlusion for 81 patients via a minimally invasive incision. A special delivery sheath was used during surgery, and an eccentric occluder was implanted in the ventricular septal defect.

RESULTS

Successful defect closure was achieved in 74 cases, perioperative arrhythmia occurred in five cases, and a large pericardial effusion was observed in two cases. Open heart surgery was performed for two patients to repair postoperative dislocation of the occluder. Intraoperative conversion to surgical repair was required in seven cases. During one to five years of follow-up, there was no late occluder dislocation, residual leakage, or thrombus-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic subarterial ventricular septal defect occlusion using a minimally invasive incision may be an alternative to open surgical repair in selected patients. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12754 (J Card Surg 2016;31:398-402).

Supracristal ventricular septal defect in adults: Is it time for a paradigm shift?

BACKGROUND

To determine the risk and predictors of progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) and other adverse events (AE) in adults with supracristal ventricular septal defect (VSD).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of 62 adults with supracristal VSD followed at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2013. Freedom from AR progression was compared by age and racial groups (Asian vs non-Asian). Predictors of AR progression were determined using Cox proportional hazard model. Composite AE endpoint was defined as AR progression, endocarditis, aneurysm of sinus of Valsalva (aSOV), and rupture of aSOV. Risk of AE was compared between group 1 (no surgical intervention) and group 2 (surgical intervention).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients aged 47(SD 12) years were followed for 13 (SD 5) years. Group 1=42/62 and group=20/62. Endpoint of AR progression and aSOV occurred in 13% and 20% respectively. Freedom from AR progression for the entire cohort was 88%, 86% and 86% at 5, 10 and 15 years respectively. Risk of AR progression was significantly lower in patients (aged ≤40 years, p=0.008) but similar between Asians and non-Asians (p=0.57). Age ≤40 years was an independent predictor of AR progression (hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% CI 2.3-5.4, p=0.001). Composite AE endpoint occurred in 33% and 40% of group1 and 2 cohorts respectively, p=0.69.

CONCLUSION

Adults with supracristal VSD are at lower risk for AR progression but higher risk for aSOV formation compared to historical pediatric cohorts. Younger age was a predictor of AR progression. Surgical intervention had no protective effect on complication rate.

Minimally invasive perventricular device closure of doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defects: single center long-term follow-up results

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of using perventricular device closure in treating selected patient with doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defect (VSD) METHODS: During July 2007 and April 2011, 86 patients with doubly committed subarterial VSD who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Perventricular closure was attempted using a unique design eccentric device under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography. Complications such as residual shunt, arrhythmia, valve regurgitation were all recorded in postoperative period and during follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to study risk factors for procedure failure and complications.

RESULT

Perventricular device closure was successfully done in 75 patients (87.2 %) with mean age 7.0 ± 7.0 years old, VSD size 4.8 ± 1.5 mm and device size 6.7 ± 1.7 mm. Complete closure rate was achieved in 94.7 % at discharge and 96 % during follow-up. No severe complications such as device embolism, significant arrhythmia, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction as well as obvious valve regurgitation were noted during follow-up (Mean 4.5 ± 1.5 years). Procedure induced trivial-mild grade aortic valve regurgitation (AR) was noted in 16 (21.3 %) patients at discharge while 8 of them resolved during follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that procedure-induced AR was associated device diameter to patients' weight (OR=12.3 95 % CI 1.5- 99.2). Perventricular device closure was failed in 11 patients, preoperative aortic valve prolapse was the major risk factor for failure of the procedure (OR=65 95 % CI 7.5- 564.1).

CONCLUSION

Perventricular closure of doubly committed subarterial VSDs appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option in selected patients with good long-term outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Unique Identifier: ChiCTR-TNC-00000203 .

Bad company: supracristal VSD presenting with ruptured sinus of valsalva aneurysm. a case presentation with echocardiographic depiction and an analysis of contemporary literature

Supracristal ventricular septal defect (SCVSD), a defect of the infundibular portion of the interventricular septum just below the right aortic cusp, occurs more frequently in Eastern Asian populations. SCVSD may be complicated by right sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SoVA). We present the case of a 26-year-old male of Korean descent with a history of a childhood murmur who was referred to our institution for progressive heart failure symptoms. He was diagnosed with SCVSD and ruptured right SoVA based on history, physical exam, and echocardiography including three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with reconstructed surgical views. The patient underwent SCVSD closure, SoVA excision, and valve-sparing aortic root replacement. We reviewed the echocardiography literature regarding SCVSD and SoVA, and analyzed contemporary literature of SoVA and its relationship with SCVSD. We conclude that a higher prevalence of ruptured SoVA in Eastern Asians is likely related to a higher prevalence of underlying SCVSD in this population.

Prognostic implications of initial echocardiographic findings in adolescents and adults with supracristal ventricular septal defects

BACKGROUND

Although surgery is recommended for pediatric patients with supracristal ventricular septal defects (sVSDs) to prevent progression of aortic regurgitation (AR), outcomes in adolescents and adults with sVSDs are not known.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, clinical data without surgery were obtained in 60 patients with sVSDs (group 1; mean age, 36 ± 13 years), 120 age- and defect size-matched patients with perimembranous ventricular septal defects (group 2), and 52 patients with sVSDs who underwent surgery (group 3; mean age, 32 ± 11 years).

RESULTS

Aortic sinus wall prolapse (38% vs 3%, P < .0001) and moderate to severe AR (7% vs 0%, P = .012) were more frequently observed in group 1 than in group 2. Five, three, and two patients in group 1 had surgery during follow-up because of rupture of the aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva, endocarditis, and heart failure, respectively. Group 1 had a lower 12-year clinical event-free (surgery and endocarditis) rate (76 ± 9% vs 94 ± 4%, P = .031) but an equivalent overall survival rate (100% vs 94 ± 3%, P = .143) compared with group 2. Patients with maximal prolapsing aortic sinus wall length > 7 mm showed a higher frequency of aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva rupture than those with no prolapse or maximal prolapsing length ≤ 7 mm (80% [four of five] vs 2% [one of 55], P < .001). The event-free and overall survival rates were comparable between groups 1 and 3, with equivalent 10-year AR progression-free survival rates (94 ± 5% vs 91 ± 5%, P = .301).

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva rupture, rather than AR progression, was the main clinical event. Watchful monitoring of patients with high-risk echocardiographic features may be a rational option.

Eisenmenger ventricular septal defect: classification, morphology, and indications for surgery

This study aimed to examine the definition and indications for surgery, to elucidate the morphologic substrate of aortic regurgitation, and to extrapolate the pathologic mechanisms of subpulmonary stenosis in Eisenmenger ventricular septal defect (EVSD). The study enrolled 160 patients. Preoperative respiratory symptoms and poor growth were present in 41 patients (26%), and 21 patients (13%) required mechanical ventilation. Perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pVSD) had been diagnosed previously for 136 of the patients (85%) at other institutions. Of the 160 patients, 51 (32%) had muscular posteroinferior rims. Aortic regurgitation was experienced by 36 patients (23%), found to be mild in 31 cases (19%) and moderate in 5 cases (3%). None of the patients had severe regurgitation. No aortic valvuloplasty was performed. The significant risk factors for aortic regurgitation were subpulmonary stenosis (p = 0.001) and a muscular posteroinferior rim (p = 0.000). Subpulmonary stenosis was seen in 57 patients (35%), found to be mild to moderate in 42 cases (26%) and severe in 15 cases (9%). Adequacy of the stenosis band was repaired through the tricuspid valve for 57 of these patients. The definition of EVSD should identify it as a subgroup different from pVSD, and it should be closed as soon as it is identified in developing countries. Aortic regurgitation occurs rarely, and aortic valvoplasty should be performed if it exceeds a moderate level. The subpulmonary stenosis can be repaired through the tricuspid valve.

Frequency of development of aortic cuspal prolapse and aortic regurgitation in patients with subaortic ventricular septal defect diagnosed at <1 year of age

The natural history of aortic cuspal prolapse and aortic regurgitation (AR), studied most commonly in subpulmonic ventricular septal defect (VSD), has not been well defined in isolated, unrepaired VSD diagnosed during infancy. This study aimed to define the incidence and progression of aortic cuspal prolapse and AR in patients with subaortic VSDs diagnosed at <1 year of age who had no aortic cuspal prolapse or AR at presentation and did not require surgery within the first year of life. Patients had yearly follow-up, and data regarding clinical course, physical examination, and echocardiography were obtained. Comparisons were made between patients who developed aortic cuspal prolapse and AR and those who did not. One hundred patients, with a mean age at VSD diagnosis of 0.1 +/- 0.5 years, followed for a mean of 7.1 +/- 10.1 years, were studied. Aortic cuspal prolapse developed in 14 patients (14%) at a mean age of 7.1 +/- 6 years (range 0.4 to 18.4). AR murmurs were heard in 6 patients (6%) at a mean age of 5.1 +/- 3.1 years, all of whom had aortic cuspal prolapse and underwent VSD closure and aortic valvuloplasty. In conclusion, aortic cuspal prolapse and clinical AR are not uncommon in patients with subaortic VSDs. Long-term follow-up of patients with subaortic VSDs should include the serial evaluation of aortic valve anatomy and function.

Progression of aortic regurgitation after surgical repair of outlet-type ventricular septal defects

BACKGROUND

Progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) in repaired outlet ventricular septal defects (VSDs) remains unclear, especially for muscular outlet and perimembranous outlet VSDs. We tried to identify the risk factors for AR progression and aortic valve replacement (AVR) at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Four hundred patients with complete follow-up after the repair of their outlet VSD between 1987 and 2002 were studied.

RESULTS

Juxta-arterial VSD, perimembranous outlet VSD, and muscular outlet VSD were noted in 190, 148, and 62 patients, respectively. There were 377 patients with none to mild AR (group I) and 23 with moderate to severe AR (group II) preoperatively. Aortic valve replacement was performed on 11 patients (all from group II), with 10 having received AVR concomitantly with VSD repair and 1 having received it 4 years later. Only severity of preoperative AR and older age (>15 years) at VSD repair were significant predictors of AVR. With a total follow-up of 2230 person-years, the 10-year freedom from AVR after VSD repair for group I was 100% and that for group II was 50.2%. In group I, AR progressed in 4 patients only (1.2%, 2 juxta-arterial and 2 perimembranous outlet) and aortic valvular (aortic valve prolapse or ruptured sinus Valsalva aneurysm) or subvalvular anomalies were present in all. The event-free (AR or AVR) survival rates among the 3 outlet-type VSDs however showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic regurgitation progression modes after surgical VSD repair were similar among the 3 outlet-type VSDs. Aortic valve replacement was rarely necessary for patients who were operated on when they were younger than 15 years. Aortic regurgitation of a less-than-moderate degree preoperatively rarely progressed after VSD repair.

Ventricular Septal Defects

Ventricular septal defects are the most common congenital heart defect. They vary greatly in location, clinical presentation, associated lesions, and natural history. The present article describes the clinical aspects of ventricular septal defects and current management strategies.

Ventricular septal defect closure in right coronary cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation complicating VSD in the outlet septum: which treatment is most appropriate?

BACKGROUND

There is currently not a standardized technique for the sizing and shaping of surgical closure of the ventricular septal defect (VSD) patch in patients with right coronary aortic cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation (AR) complicating VSD in the outlet septum.

METHODS

Forty-six VSD patients who had aortic valve prolapse were divided into groups DC (direct closure, n=19), and SPC (small patch closure, n=27). Preoperative and postoperative echocardiography with Doppler color flow interrogation was performed on all patients.

RESULTS

In the DC group, among seven patients who had aortic valve prolapse but no AR preoperative, one patient developed AR during postoperative follow-up period. In the remaining 12 patients who had mild AR associated with aortic valve prolapse prior to the procedure, AR was diminished in four and unchanged in six patients. However, AR was aggravated in two patients who required further operations for AV repair or replacement. In the SPC group, among the eight patients who had no preoperative AR, AR progressed in one patient postoperatively. In the remaining 19 patients who had mild AR, AR was diminished in 15 and unchanged in four. The outcome from the operative procedure was significantly better in the SPC group than DC group with mild preoperative AR (chi(2)=7.82; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Small patch closure for this type of VSD is safer and more reliable in improving mild AR than that of direct closure, especially in patients with mild AR.

Surgical correction of ventricular septal defect with aortic regurgitation in a dog

An 8-month-old entire Miniature Dachshund, weighing 4.2 kg, was presented for examination following delvelopment of a cough. Ventricular septal defect had been diagnosed tentatively in its infancy on the basis of a cardiac murmur detected by auscultation and echocardiography. Echocardiography using a B mode right parasternal long-axis view showed a defect at the atrioventricular junction and a thickened cusp of the aortic valve prolapsing into the defect. Colour-flow Doppler showed shunt blood flow across the defect at the level of the atrioventricular junction, from left to right. The sinus of Valsalva was dilated, with turbulent blood flow. Aortic regurgitation was also observed. Cardiac catheterisation studies confirmed the diagnosis of a supracristal ventricular septal defect with aortic regurgitation. Despite medication with digoxin, enalapril and aminophylin, started from the first admission, left ventricular internal dimensions gradually increased, and fractional shortening of the left ventricle gradually decreased. Surgery, with the aid of extracorporeal circulation, to close the ventricular septal defect, was performed 1 year after the initial examination. The aortic valve was left untreated. Postoperatively, the systolic murmur disappeared. Shunt flow from the left to the right ventricle was no longer observed on echocardiography, however there was still a small amount of aortic regurgitation during diastole visualised with colour-flow Doppler echocardiography. The prolapse of the cusp of the aortic valve on B-mode echocardiography was no longer observed and thickening of the cusp had not progressed. Left ventricular function measurement using M mode echocardiography showed a reduced left ventricular volume overload with reduced left ventricular internal dimensions and increased fractional shortening. The cough was relieved and no follow-up medication was scheduled. Early surgical closure of the ventricular septal defect improved the patient's condition and controlled prolapse and thickening of the aortic valve.

Ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in two patients with subarterial ventricular septal defect

Rupture of a sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is a rare, but life-threatening, event and requires immediate recognition and intervention. We present two previously healthy and physically active patients who were 12 and 33 years of age when rupture of a right coronary SVA into the right ventricle occurred. A subarterial ventricular septal defect (VSD) was detectable in both patients. Cardiac surgery involved VSD closure as well as reconstruction of the aortic valve. Considering complications of subarterial VSD, such as aortic cusp prolapse, aortic insufficiency or SVA, we suggest close follow-up and surgical closure of the VSD in case of any aortic valve deformity.

Ventricular septal defect and aortic valve regurgitation: pathophysiology and indications for surgery

As the velocity of a fluid increases a low-pressure zone is created, this is the Venturi effect and it explains the pathogenesis of aortic valve prolapse (AVP) and aortic insufficiency (AI) that is observed in a subset of patients with a ventricular septal defect (VSD). The VSDs complicated by AI are restrictive with high velocity shunting through the VSD, creating a low-pressure zone that impacts the adjacent aortic valve cusp resulting in AVP and subsequent AI. AVP and AI are therefore acquired lesions. AI is absent at birth because the forces necessary to create the low-pressure zone within the restrictive VSD do not exist in utero. The risk of development of AI increases during childhood, peaking at 5 to 10 years of age. VSD closure eliminates the low-pressure zone that is the cause of ongoing aortic valve cusp deformity and, if performed early, prevents development of AI. Patients with a subarterial VSD and AVP should undergo surgery to prevent the development of AI because this complicates about half of subarterial VSDs with AVP and spontaneous closure is rare. Patients with perimembranous VSDs with AVP should be followed with serial echocardiography and undergo VSD closure if more than trivial AI develops.

Surgical repair of infundibular ventricular septal defect and aortic regurgitation

Interpretation of the anatomy of the defect and the pathophysiology has guided the surgical technique and indications for infundibular ventricular septal defect VSD. Infundibular ventricular septal defects are located in the infundibular septum, between the two commissures of the right coronary cusp. The defect is associated with an anomaly of the right sinus of Valsalva where the transition to cusp tissue occurs higher than normally. There is development of fibrous adherences between the ventricular surface of the right coronary cusp and the crest of the septum. This reduces the height of the cusp and destabilizes the valve. The aim is to reposition the hinge point of the right coronary cusp to restore the normal height of the cusp, hence a normal surface of apposition. This is achieved with a trans-aortic approach. The major difference with other techniques described is the extensive mobilization of the cusp. The procedure is completed by a reduction of the free edge of the right coronary cusp if it is elongated. This technique is indicated in all patients with infundibular ventricular septal defect in whom an aortic regurgitation appears or increases during follow-up. Fifteen patients were operated on with this technique between 1996 and 2005. Thirteen have achieved good results at follow-up. There was one late death.

Impact of noncoronary cusp prolapse in addition to right coronary cusp prolapse in patients with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect

BACKGROUND

Few data are available with regard to the impact of aortic cusp herniation on the evolution of aortic regurgitation (AR) in patients with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD).

METHODS

One hundred and two patients with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect with right coronary cusp prolapse were divided to two groups depending on the development of aortic regurgitation. The original defect diameter, the right coronary cusp deformity index (RCCD), and the right coronary cusp imbalance index were obtained as we reported previously.

RESULTS

Mild aortic regurgitation was detected in 35 patients, and moderate in three. No aortic regurgitation was observed in 64 patients. A significantly larger number of patients had noncoronary cusp prolapse and the right coronary cusp imbalance index >/=1.30 in the aortic regurgitation group than in the no regurgitation group. Relative risk and odds ratio of noncoronary cusp prolapse and the right coronary cusp imbalance index >/=1.30 for development of aortic regurgitation were 3.69 (95% CI, 0.91-15.03) and 27.90 (95.94-130.85), and 2.23 (0.83-5.98) and 4.70 (1.44-15.27), respectively. Surgical closure was performed in 29 patients. All patients with no noncoronary cusp prolapse underwent simple patch closure of the ventricular septal defect, while five patients with noncoronary cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation underwent aortic valvuloplasty. Among these, one patient needed aortic valve replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional complication of noncoronary cusp prolapse is a strong risk factor for the development of aortic regurgitation in patients with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect with right coronary cusp prolapse.

Aortic Valve Prolapse Associated With Outlet-Type Ventricular Septal Defect

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve prolapse is frequently associated with juxta-arterial ventricular septal defect. The significance of its association with other outlet types of ventricular septal defect, however, remains unclear.

METHODS

From 1987 to 2002, 677 patients (male:female ratio, 424:253) who received surgical repair for ventricular septal defect extending to the outlet septum were reviewed. Based on surgical findings, ventricular septal defects were classified as juxta-arterial, perimembranous outlet, or muscular outlet type.

RESULTS

Aortic valve prolapse occurred in 373 of 677 patients (57.2%) with 209 juxta-arterial, 103 perimembranous outlet, and 61 muscular outlet type. Significant aortic regurgitation developed in 51 of 373 (14%). Among 252 patients with regular follow-up, the mean onset ages of aortic valve prolapse in juxta-arterial, perimembranous outlet, and muscular outlet type were 4.9, 5.0, and 5.1 years, respectively (no statistical difference). The presence of larger shunt and probably anterior malalignment predicted an earlier onset of aortic valve prolapse. Perimembranous outlet and muscular outlet type ventricular septal defect were frequently associated with infundibular hypertrophy and subaortic ridge, and perimembranous outlet type was associated with anterior septal malalignment. In juxta-arterial ventricular septal defect and ventricular septal defect with anterior malalignment, prolapsed cusp was always the right coronary cusp, but noncoronary cusp involvement was also common in perimembranous outlet type (17 of 103, 16.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The association with anterior septal malalignment, infundibular stenosis and subaortic ridge is related to the location of the outlet ventricular septal defect. The age of onset of aortic valve prolapse in each type was quite similar, and a larger shunt may predict an earlier onset.

Severity Indices of Right Coronary Cusp Prolapse and Aortic Regurgitation Complicating Ventricular Septal Defect in the Outlet Septum-Which Defect Should Be Closed?-

BACKGROUND

The factors that may determine the evolution of right coronary cusp prolapse (RCCP) and regurgitation (AR) associated with a ventricular septal defect in the outlet septum (outlet VSD) have not been clarified.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Doppler echocardiograms of 316 patients were grouped according to both the development of RCCP, and the values of the right coronary cusp deformity index (RCCD) and the right coronary cusp imbalance index (R/L). All detected AR was </= slight, and not progressive in patients with both RCCD <0.30 and R/L <1.30. Moderate AR was detected in patients with either RCCD >/=0.30 or R/L >/=0.30. Rupture of the sinus of Valsalva was identified in patients with RCCD >/=0.30. A significantly large number of patients with both RCCD >/=0.30 and R/L >/=1.30 (p<0.01), and a few patients with either RCCD >/=0.30 or R/L >/=0.30 underwent aortic valvuloplasty or replacement. Operative outcome for AR </= slight was good.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no need to close an outlet VSD with RCCP when the RCCD <0.30 and R/L <1.30 as long as the AR remains trivial, but such defects should be closed when the RCCD is >/=0.30 or R/L >/=1.30.

Eccentric aortic regurgitation in patients with right coronary cusp prolapse complicating a ventricular septal defect

To analyze the clinical significance of eccentric aortic regurgitation (AR) complicating the right coronary cusp prolapse associated with a ventricular septal defect (VSD), the Doppler echocardiograms of 129 patients were reviewed. In 102 patients, AR was classified as mild and in 27 patients it was classified as moderate. Eccentric AR was defined as the jet distributing in an eccentric direction. In 15 patients of the moderate group, AR was already moderate at the initial examination and of these, the AR was eccentric in 14 and central in 1. In 12 patients who initially had mild AR, it became moderate during follow-up. In 7 patients with mild, central AR, 6 worsened to central moderate AR and 1 evolved to eccentric moderate AR. Eccentric mild AR patients all developed eccentric moderate AR. Within the mild AR group, 5 of 9 patients with eccentric AR progressed from mild to moderate, whereas only 7 of 105 patients with central AR did so (p<0.01). In conclusion, eccentric AR may be an advanced finding of the AR associated with right coronary cusp prolapse in some patients, but in others eccentric AR is highly likely to progress and is malignant.

Impact of preoperative aortic cusp prolapse on long-term outcome after surgical closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect

BACKGROUND

Previous reports on the long-term outcome of surgical closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect were based on a relatively small number of patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the long-term outcome of 135 patients who underwent closure of their defect and, in light of the findings, assessed the impact of preoperative aortic cusp prolapse and surgical interventions on occurrence of aortic regurgitation (AR) in the long-term. The patients were categorized into three groups for comparison: group I consisted of 79 patients with no aortic cusp prolapse and underwent simple closure of ventricular septal defect, group II comprised 39 patients with mild to moderate cusp prolapse who similarly had only closure of the defect performed, whereas group III comprised 17 patients who had additional aortic valvoplasty for greater than moderate to severe cusp prolapse.

RESULTS

Group I patients had significantly higher pulmonary arterial pressure (p < 0.001) and ratio of pulmonary blood flow to systemic blood flow (p < 0.001). None of these patients had AR before their operation, and none experienced AR afterward at a median follow-up of 6.1 years. Of the 39 group II patients, 30 (77%) had trivial or mild AR preoperatively. The AR improved in 15 patients, remained trivial or mild in 14 and absent in 7, but progressed to trivial or mild in 3 at a median follow-up of 3.1 years. None required further interventions. In contrast, 14 (82%) of the 17 group III patients had moderate to severe AR before operation. The regurgitation improved in 10, but remained moderate or severe in 4 and worsened further in 3 at a median follow-up of 4.6 years. The freedom from failure of aortic valvoplasty was (mean +/- standard error of the mean) 71%+/-11%, 64%+/-12%, and 43%+/-19% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. An older age at latest follow-up was the only identifiable significant risk factor (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not support the need of aortic valvoplasty for mild to moderate aortic cusp prolapse. Close follow-up is warranted in those with greater than moderate to severe cusp prolapse despite valvoplasty as there is continued failure on follow-up. Nothing, however, is better than early closure of defects before development of aortic valve complications.