Comparison of degree of platelet inhibition by abciximab versus tirofiban in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the treatment of thromboembolic events related to endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms-systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thromboembolism complication is considered the most common complication associated with the treatment of endovascular. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the studies investigating the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor agents on thromboembolic complications during endovascular aneurysm coiling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review investigated the outcome of the use of three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor agents (ie abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide) on the thromboembolic complications during endovascular aneurysm coiling. The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline were searched up to 25 June 2021, using the keywords "Abciximab," "Tirofiban," and "Eptifibatide" incombination with "Thromboembolism Complication," "Aneurysms," and "Endovascular Aneurysm Coiling."

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles were found to be eligible and included in this review. The rates of complete and partial recanalization were estimated to be 56% and 92% in patients who underwent abciximab and tirofiban therapy, respectively. Rupture aneurysms were found in the majority of patients. In general, the mortality rate of the patients treated for thromboembolic complications during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was found to be 4.8% (CI 95%:0.027-0.067; p < .005). The average remission rate in studies investigating thromboembolism was 91% (CI 95%:0.88-0.95, I2 : 65.65/p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the obtained results, a higher mean rate of complete recanalization by eptifibatide was found in studies in which abciximab or tirofiban were used, compared to other mentioned agents. Moreover, the amount of hemorrhage was reported to be less after using tirofiban rather than abciximab.

Platelet Signaling and Disease: Targeted Therapy for Thrombosis and Other Related Diseases

Platelets are essential for clotting in the blood and maintenance of normal hemostasis. Under pathologic conditions such as atherosclerosis, vascular injury often results in hyperactive platelet activation, resulting in occlusive thrombus formation, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Recent work in the field has elucidated a number of platelet functions unique from that of maintaining hemostasis, including regulation of tumor growth and metastasis, inflammation, infection, and immune response. Traditional therapeutic targets for inhibiting platelet activation have primarily been limited to cyclooxygenase-1, integrin αIIbβ3, and the P2Y12 receptor. Recently identified signaling pathways regulating platelet function have made it possible to develop novel approaches for pharmacological intervention in the blood to limit platelet reactivity. In this review, we cover the newly discovered roles for platelets as well as their role in hemostasis and thrombosis. These new roles for platelets lend importance to the development of new therapies targeted to the platelet. Additionally, we highlight the promising receptor and enzymatic targets that may further decrease platelet activation and help to address the myriad of pathologic conditions now known to involve platelets without significant effects on hemostasis.

Development of glycoprotein IIb–IIIa antagonists: translation of pharmacodynamic effects into clinical benefit

This article will review the development of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists, with particular emphasis on the characteristics and pharmacodynamic studies of each agent that is available for clinical use. Abciximab is a Fab fragment of the 7E3 antibody that has high affinity and a slow rate of dissociation from glycoprotein IIb-IIIa. In contrast, the small molecules eptifibatide and tirofiban, have a much more rapid rate of dissociation, with an off time of 10 to 15 s. Accordingly, the circulating pool of abciximab is predominantly associated with platelets, whereas maintenance of a consistent concentration of tirofiban and eptifibatide in the blood is critical in order to achieve and sustain their inhibitory effects. The affinity of abciximab and tirofiban for glycoprotein IIb-IIIa are substantially greater than that of eptifibatide, necessitating maintenance of greater molar concentrations of eptifibatide in blood in order to achieve effective inhibition of the binding of fibrinogen to the activated conformer of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa.

Intra-arterial infusion of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist for the treatment of thromboembolism during coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm: a comparison of abciximab and tirofiban

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Abciximab and tirofiban are commonly used for the treatment of thromboembolisms that form during coiling of intracranial aneurysms; however, it is not known which of these inhibitors is safer and more effective. We report the safety and the recanalization rates for intra-arterial abciximab and intra-arterial tirofiban infusion for the treatment of thromboembolisms that form during coiling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2004 and April 2011, 346 intracranial aneurysms were treated with coiling. Thromboembolisms developed in 22 of these patients and were treated by use of intra-arterial tirofiban (n = 11) or abciximab (n = 11) infusion.

RESULTS

In the abciximab group, the thromboembolisms were completely (n = 1) or partially (n = 7) resolved in 8 cases (72.7%) at the time of the final control angiography. Complete (n = 9) or partial (n = 2) resolution was achieved in all cases at the time of follow-up angiography (<3 days after the procedure). In the tirofiban group, thromboembolisms were completely (n = 4) or partially (n = 6) resolved in 10 cases (90.9%) at the time of the final control angiography. Complete (n = 9) or partial (n = 2) resolution was observed in all cases at the time of the follow-up angiography. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to thrombus resolution (final angiography, P = .311; follow-up angiography, P = .707). No hemorrhagic complications developed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that tirofiban is more effective than abciximab for the immediate resolution of thromboembolisms, with no statistical significance. Both intra-arterial tirofiban and abciximab exhibited similar safety and recanalization rates.

Integrin αIIbβ3: from discovery to efficacious therapeutic target

From the initial description of platelets in 1882, their propensity to aggregate and to contribute to thrombosis was apparent. Indeed, excessive platelet aggregation is associated with myocardial infarction and other thrombotic diseases whereas Glanzmann thrombasthenia, in which platelet aggregation is reduced, is a bleeding syndrome. Over the last half of the 20th century, many investigators have provided insights into the cellular and molecular basis for platelet aggregation. The major membrane protein on platelets, integrin αIIbβ3, mediates this response by rapidly transiting from its resting to an activated state in which it serves as a receptor for ligands that can bridge platelets together. Monoclonal antibodies, natural products, and small peptides were all shown to inhibit αIIbβ3 dependent platelet aggregation, and these inhibitors became the forerunners of antagonists that proceeded through preclinical testing and into large patient trials to treat acute coronary syndromes, particularly in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions. Three such αIIbβ3 antagonists, abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban, received Food and Drug Administration approval. Over the past 15 years, millions of patients have been treated with these αIIbβ3 antagonists and many lives have been saved by their administration. With the side effect of increased bleeding and the development of new antithrombotic drugs, the use of αIIbβ3 antagonists is waning. Nevertheless, they are still widely used for the prevention of periprocedural thrombosis during percutaneous coronary interventions. This review focuses on the biology of αIIbβ3, the development of its antagonists, and some of the triumphs and shortcomings of αIIbβ3 antagonism.

Anti-platelet therapy: glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonists inhibit the aggregation of activated platelets. Three agents are approved for clinical use. In this review, the characteristics of each agent, their pharmacodynamic profile, results in pivotal clinical trials and the associated clinical implications are discussed. GP IIb-IIIa antagonists have greatest benefit when used as adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when the patient has intra-coronary thrombosis. These agents appear to provide greatest benefit when used in combination with heparin. The clinical niche for parenteral GP IIb-IIIa antagonists is evolving. The rapid onset and offset of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists plus dosing designed to inhibit extensively platelet aggregation differentiates them from oral agents. The contemporary niche appears to include patients in transition, such as individuals requiring emergent PCI before oral agents are fully active and for unstable patients requiring transport to PCI centres, particularly in patients likely to have intracoronary thrombus. Subsequent studies should evaluate the optimal duration of therapy with GP IIb-IIIa antagonists.

Tirofiban versus abciximab: tirofiban is administered at suboptimal dosages when evaluated in an arterial thrombosis model in non-human primates

To prevent thrombosis in high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for re-vascularisation, concomitant administration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, such as abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide, is recommended. Abciximab and eptifibatide are mostly preferred over tirofiban, which is less effective in preventing ischaemic events. We compared the efficacy and bleeding potential of escalating doses of tirofiban and abciximab in non-human primates. The efficacy of tirofiban and abciximab in inhibiting cyclic flow reductions (CFRs) was tested in a high shear arterial thrombosis model. Bleeding was evaluated with the template bleeding time and an incision bleeding model. Abciximab completely inhibited arterial thrombosis after injection of its therapeutic bolus dose. With tirofiban, a dose three times higher than the recommended therapeutic dose caused weak inhibition characterised by a return of CFRs after re-injury. At nine times the recommended therapeutic dose, complete inhibition was observed, and the efficacy of tirofiban was comparable to abciximab at its therapeutic bolus dose. Blood loss was less than with abciximab at its effective dose. In this model, tirofiban compared favourably with abciximab, although only at a dose of 3-9 times the therapeutic dose, and caused less bleeding than abciximab.

Pegnivacogin results in near complete FIX inhibition in acute coronary syndrome patients: RADAR pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic substudy

AIMS

Establishing factor IX inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (ACS/NSTEMI), a setting characterized by increased factor IX activity, is critical to investigate the REG1 system in this target population. The REG1 system (Regado Biosciences, Basking Ridge, NJ) consists of pegnivacogin (RB006), an RNA aptamer that directly inhibits factor IXa, and anivamersen (RB007), its complementary control agent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

RADAR is a Phase 2b study investigating the use of pegnivacogin in patients (n = 800) with ACS undergoing planned early cardiac catheterization. To validate dose selection and stability of anticoagulation throughout the time of cardiac catheterization at an early stage of the clinical trial, 33 patients, 22 of whom had not received recent prior heparin, underwent thorough pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment. Fold prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was used to impute factor IX inhibition. Pegnivacogin 1 mg/kg rapidly achieved a high pegnivacogin plasma concentration (26.1 ± 4.6 µg/mL), prolonged the aPTT (mean aPTT 93.0 ± 9.5 s), and approached near complete factor IX inhibition (mean fold increase from baseline 2.9 ± 0.3). These levels remained stable from the time of drug administration through completion of the catheterization.

CONCLUSION

Pegnivacogin administered at a weight-adjusted dose of 1 mg/kg consistently achieves a high level of factor IX activity inhibition among patients with ACS and provides stable anticoagulation during cardiac catheterization. These findings support the dose of pegnivacogin selected for the RADAR study.

Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors--Part I

With the central importance of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and the numerous positive trials with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIa inhibitors given intravenously, it was hoped that one could extend the benefit of IIb/IIIa inhibition to long-term treatment. Although the hypothesis that prolonged oral IIb/IIIa inhibition was appealing, many issues have been identified in the initial Phase II trials that would limit the usefulness of these compounds. Variability of the level of platelet inhibition was one major culprit that distinguished the oral compounds from intravenous ones. The problems that arose were that increased bleeding has been seen when levels of platelet inhibition are high (e.g., > 90%) and that, conversely, efficacy would likely be limited when levels of platelet inhibition were low. If further development of this class of drugs is undertaken, formal dosing studies would have to establish an oral dosing strategy that achieves appropriately high (80-95% inhibition) and steady levels of inhibition.

Comparison of abciximab with “high-dose” tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The TARGET study has been criticised for sub-optimal platelet inhibition with tirofiban. We aimed to compare a high-dose bolus regimen of tirofiban (hd-tirofiban) to standard dose of abciximab for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We assessed consecutive patients who received either hd-tirofiban (25 mcg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min infusion for 18 h) or standard dose abciximab. In-hospital and 6-month outcomes were obtained in all cases.

RESULTS

Over an 18-month period, 109 patients who received hd-tirofiban were compared with 110 patients who received abciximab. Both hd-tirofiban and abciximab groups had acute coronary syndromes in 86% and 80% and diabetes in 10% and 13% respectively. Most patients had coronary stent implantation (96% vs. 98%). Thrombocytopenia (platelet count< 100,000) developed in 0.9% of patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 2% of patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.566). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 7.3% and 3% of patients respectively (p = 0.118). Peri-procedural troponin rise was 0.9% in patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 5.5% in patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.07). MACE (Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Revascularisation and Death) at 6 months was 23% in the hd-tirofiban group and 20% in the abciximab group (p = 0.711). The pharmaceutical costs were AUD 322 for hd-tirofiban (one ampoule) and AUD 1,350 for abciximab (3 ampoules).

CONCLUSION

There was a small increase in bleeding requiring transfusion and a lower rate of peri-procedural troponin rise in the hd-tirofiban group however, the overall 6-month MACE rates were similar in both groups. There was a considerable cost-saving with the use of hd-tirofiban. A prospective randomised trial of hd-tirofiban vs. abciximab is warranted.

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Downstream administration of a high-dose tirofiban bolus in high-risk patients with unstable angina undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The best treatment option for high-risk patients with unstable coronary syndrome is an early invasive strategy accompanied by intensive anti-platelet therapy. We tested the effect on clinical outcome of early coronary angioplasty using a high-dose bolus of tirofiban in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

One hundred and forty consecutive patients with unstable coronary syndrome who underwent an immediate percutaneous coronary intervention with the administration of a high (25 microg/kg) dose bolus of tirofiban followed by an 18-h infusion of 0.15 microg kg(-1) min(-1) were compared with a matched control group of 162 patients treated with abciximab. The primary endpoint of the study was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of major and minor bleeding.

RESULTS

The time from admission to PCI was slightly shorter in the tirofiban group (3.9+/-4.8 vs. 4.5+/-4.4 h; P=0.26). The 30-day rate of major adverse cardiac events was similar in the two groups (6% with tirofiban and 8.6% with abciximab: OR=1.37, 95% CI=0.58-3.29, P=0.52). No major bleeding episodes were observed; the incidence of minor bleeding was 3.6% in the tirofiban group and 2.5% in the abciximab group (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.18-2.59, P=0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, the beneficial effect of the administration of a high-dose tirofiban bolus on 30-day clinical outcomes was similar to that of abciximab in high-risk patients with unstable angina undergoing immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. The results of this therapeutic strategy should be tested in a larger randomised study.

The Role of Risk Stratification in the Decision to Provide Upstream Versus Selective Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors for Acute Coronary Syndromes

OBJECTIVES

We endeavored to determine under what conditions a strategy of upstream use of small molecule platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors for all acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients is cost effective compared to that of selective use of abciximab in only those patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown benefit in ACS, but abciximab, the more expensive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, may be more effective during PCI. However, abciximab does not have proven efficacy in medical management. No prior study has attempted to balance these competing benefits.

METHODS

A decision analysis was performed to examine two strategies: 1) treat all ACS patients upstream with a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and continue through medical management and PCI, if performed; or 2) wait, and selectively use abciximab only in patients who ultimately undergo PCI. Applicable randomized controlled trial data were used for the principal analysis.

RESULTS

The strategy of upstream use of a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was superior to selective use, and economically acceptable, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 18,000 dollars per year of life gained. The superiority of the upstream use strategy persisted over the majority of sensitivity analyses. When stratified by risk according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score, a strategy of upstream use was only cost effective in those patients with moderate or high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Upstream use of small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in ACS patients with moderate or high risk for cardiovascular events is a cost-effective approach that should be considered in this subset of patients.

Hämostaseologie

The design and development of new antithrombotics, i.e. anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, is a rapidly expanding area of pharmacological research. New anticoagulants, i.e. inhibitors of thrombin formation and action have been developed and some of them are already in clinical use. This includes hirudin and its analogs, such as bivalirudin. In contrast to heparins, these compounds as well as low-molecular weight inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa directly inhibit thrombus-associated generation and action of thrombin, eventually associated with a reduced bleeding tendency. Orally active compounds are available and currently subject of clinical trials. It appears possible that these new agents may replace cumarins as oral anticoagulants, specifically in long-term use, in the near future. The introduction of clopidogrel marks another important development in the field of antiplatelet drugs. Synergistic actions of this compound with acetylsalicylic acid and GP-IIb/IIIa-antagonists because of their different mode of action enhance the antithrombotic potential considerably and have been clinically confirmed. Despite of this optimistic outlook, the individual risk/benefit ratio of these new drugs, in particular in the area of anticoagulants, still needs to be defined.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for adjustment of tirofiban and clopidogrel dosage

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive data supporting the use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors in the therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there is considerable debate as to the optimal choice of antiplatelet regimen. The objective of this study was to conduct a detailed time-resolved analysis of the effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban with concomitant clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to improve the dosing regimen of these two commonly used antiplatelet drugs.

METHODS

The study was performed in 14 patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS who underwent PCI while being treated with the current typically utilized regimen of tirofiban (10 microg/kg bolus, 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion) and clopidogrel (300 mg). Platelet function was assessed before, during, and after tirofiban infusion using a panel of agonists for ADP receptors, PAR1 and PAR4 thrombin receptors, and collagen receptors.

RESULTS

Measurements of circulating tirofiban levels demonstrated a trough, which paralleled a reduction in platelet inhibition for all platelet agonists during the time when PCI was being performed. Interestingly, younger ACS patients (<55 years) exhibited less inhibition of platelet function both during the PCI procedure and after termination of the tirofiban infusion. These apparent age differences were primarily attributed to a decreased responsiveness of the younger patients to clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the currently utilized tirofiban dosage is suboptimal and suggests that patients may benefit from a higher dose regimen.

Comparison in patients having primary coronary angioplasty of abciximab versus tirofiban on recovery of left ventricular function

In patients treated with primary coronary angioplasty, the use of abciximab improves microvascular perfusion and enhances the recovery of contractile function. This study compared the effects of the new dose regimen of tirofiban (25-microg/kg bolus followed by an 18-hour infusion at 0.15 microg/kg/min) on left ventricular function with those of abciximab in patients who underwent direct angioplasty. One hundred patients who underwent primary coronary angioplasty were randomized to receive a standard dose of abciximab or a large-dose bolus of tirofiban. The primary end point of the study was change in the infarct-zone wall motion score index between the initial and 30-day follow-up echocardiographic studies. The secondary end points were procedural evaluations before and after Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade flow, TIMI grade myocardial perfusion, and corrected TIMI frame count. Baseline global and regional ventricular functions were similar in the 2 treatment groups. After the procedure, a TIMI grade 3 flow was obtained in 86% of patients treated with abciximab and 88% of those receiving tirofiban (p = 1.0), whereas TIMI grade 3 myocardial perfusion was present in 70% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.65); corrected TIMI frame count was 22.5 +/- 1.9 and 22.1 +/- 2.5 (p = 0.37). After 30 days, we obtained 87 paired echocardiographic studies. The infarct-zone wall motion score index decreased from 2.20 +/- 0.3 to 1.99 +/- 0.2 in the abciximab group and from 2.18 +/- 0.3 to 1.95 +/- 0.3 in the tirofiban group (p = 0.67). Thus, in patients who had primary coronary angioplasty, abciximab, and the large-dose bolus of tirofiban showed similar effects on the initial angiographic results and 30-day recovery of left ventricular function.

Comparative pharmacodynamic evaluation of eptifibatide and tirofiban HCl in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (the TAM1 Study)

We performed a comparative analysis of platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors eptifibatide and tirofiban HCl in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and used light transmission aggregometric assays with D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone as an anticoagulant and 20 micromol of adenosine diphosphate as an agonist. Taking into account the differences in clinical efficacy of these 2 drugs in large trials investigating percutaneous coronary intervention, we hypothesized that the variable clinical effects might be related to variability in the magnitude and consistency of platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with dosing regimens of these glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists: a comparative review of their use in percutaneous coronary intervention

Antiplatelet therapy is critical during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as it reduces the incidence of abrupt closure and distal thrombi embolization, which are significant acute peri-procedural complications likely responsible for the clinical adverse outcomes with PCI, namely death, myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularization. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, potent antiplatelet agents, have been specifically tested during PCI. There are currently three commercially available GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists and results from more than ten randomized clinical PCI trials have established their clinical efficacy and tolerability during coronary intervention. There remain questions regarding variability in efficacy among individual clinical trials and among population subsets, potential clinical differences among the available agents, and their optimal use. This article will critically review the body of evidence for clinical efficacy and tolerability of each individual tested compound, highlight potential differences among agents, and raise important issues involving their use in clinical practice.

Safety of a high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients undergoing coronary stent placement

To overcome the suboptimal platelet inhibition induced by tirofiban in the first hour after a percutaneous coronary intervention, a new regimen of 25 microg/kg bolus followed by an 18-hr infusion of 0.15 microg/kg/min has been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of this high bolus dose of tirofiban with those of abciximab on bleeding risk and 30-day clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stenting. We compared two cohorts of patients who underwent coronary stent placement between January 2000 and December 2002. In the first cohort, the only available IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor was abciximab, which was given to 280 (34.9%) out of 802 stented patients; in the second cohort, tirofiban was administered to 274 (38.3%) out of 716 treated patients. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with major bleeding and the rate of site access complications; the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was also assessed. After the procedure, the patients were given ticlopidine for 4 weeks and aspirin indefinitely. Major bleeding episodes were observed in four patients receiving abciximab and in none receiving tirofiban (1.4% vs. 0%; P = 0.12); the rates of site access complications were similar (3.6% vs. 3.3%; P = 0.96). The 30-day incidence of MACE was 7.1% in the abciximab group and 5.8% in the tirofiban group (P = 0.65). In patients undergoing coronary stenting, the high bolus dose of tirofiban is safe and not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or site access complications in comparison with abciximab.

Outcomes with changes in prescribing of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in PCI

BACKGROUND

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists have been shown to have an impact on the outcomes of death/myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. At our institution, tirofiban has largely replaced abciximab in an attempt to decrease costs.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of this change on patient outcomes in the absence of head-to-head trials.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed and telephone follow-ups were conducted on patients receiving tirofiban (n = 83) at our facility between February and November 1999. Death/MI at 30 days and 6 months after infusion were recorded. Safety and length of stay (LOS) were also assessed. These data were compared using chi2 analysis with results obtained from a previous review of abciximab use (n = 83) collected between May 1997 and November 1998.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the baseline incidence of (1) cardiovascular risk factors, (2) prior revascularization, (3) prior MI, (4) the number of vessels with atherosclerotic disease assessed by angiography, and (5) the number of vessels receiving procedures. Death/MI trended to be worse with tirofiban versus abciximab at our institution at 30 days (4.8% abciximab vs. 12% tirofiban; p = 0.163) and 6 months (6% abciximab vs. 18.1% tirofiban; p = 0.032). Bleeding and median LOS (3 d abciximab vs. 3 d tirofiban) were not different. Despite an increase in pharmacy cost, the use of abciximab provided these outcomes without an increase in total hospital cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived economically driven change in medication selection from abciximab to tirofiban may not have been appropriate based on the negative trends seen in this review. To maintain optimal patient outcomes, this change should be reevaluated.

The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI)

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and Tirofiban Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Ineligible for Reperfusion (TETAMI) study were to demonstrate that enoxaparin was superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and that tirofiban was better than placebo in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who do not receive timely reperfusion.

BACKGROUND

An optimal treatment strategy has not been identified for the many STEMI patients ineligible for acute reperfusion.

METHODS

A total of 1224 patients were enrolled in 91 centers in 14 countries between July 1999 and July 2002. Patients with STEMI ineligible for reperfusion were randomized to enoxaparin, enoxaparin plus tirofiban, UFH, or UFH plus tirofiban. All patients received oral aspirin. The primary efficacy end point was the 30-day combined incidence of death, reinfarction, or recurrent angina; the primary analysis was the comparison of the pooled enoxaparin and UFH groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary efficacy end point was 15.7% enoxaparin versus 17.3% for UFH (odds ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval CI = 0.66 to 1.21]) and 16.6% for tirofiban versus 16.4% for placebo (odds ratio 1.02 [95% CI 0.75 to 1.38]). The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major hemorrhage rate was 1.5% for enoxaparin versus 1.3% for UFH (odds ratio 1.16 [95% CI 0.44 to 3.02]) and 1.8% versus 1% for tirofiban versus placebo (odds ratio 1.82 [95% CI 0.67 to 4.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show that enoxaparin significantly reduced the 30-day incidence of death, reinfarction, and recurrent angina compared with UFH in non-reperfused STEMI patients. However, enoxaparin appears to have a similar safety and efficacy profile to UFH and may be an alternative treatment. Additional therapy with tirofiban did not appear beneficial.

Angiographic variables predict increased riskfor adverse ischemic events after coronarystenting with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess whether pre-procedural angiographic characteristics are associated with adverse clinical outcomes after coronary stenting with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic complications after balloon angioplasty are associated with pre- and post-procedural angiographic variables. However, in the current era of stenting with IIb/IIIa inhibition, it is unknown whether angiographic features assessed before intervention confer an increased risk of adverse procedural and subsequent clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In the Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes? Trial (TARGET), 4,809 patients undergoing planned stenting were randomized to tirofiban or abciximab. Baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic variables were obtained. Clinical end points were recorded at 30 days and six months. The relationship between angiographic variables and adverse clinical outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Patients with the combination of thrombus, lesion eccentricity, and lesion length >20 mm had a 21.4% composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days, compared with 4.2% in those patients without these high-risk features (hazard ratio [HR] 3.24, p < 0.001). After adjustment, the risk was independently associated with thrombus (HR 1.40, p = 0.034), eccentricity (HR 1.67, p < 0.001), and lesion length >20 mm (HR 1.89, p < 0.001). The risk of six-month TVR was independently associated with left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (HR 1.46, p < 0.001), restenotic lesions at baseline (HR 1.58, p = 0.006), and lesion length (HR 1.19, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with thrombus, eccentric lesions, or lesion length >20 mm are at high risk for ischemic outcomes after coronary stenting, despite IIb/IIIa inhibition. Further research into novel anti-thrombotic therapies or procedural strategies is necessary for these patients.

Preliminary experience with a high bolus dose of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

In the TARGET study, sub-optimal platelet inhibition with tirofiban was held responsible for the higher incidence of periprocedural CK-MB release compared to abciximab. Since then, a new, higher bolus dose of tirofiban has been proposed to increase blood concentrations very soon after the start of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the bleeding risk and clinical outcome at 30 days in a series of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the new dosing regimen of tirofiban (25 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.15 microg kg(-1) min(-1) infusion for 18 h).

METHODS

A total of 133 consecutive patients underwent a PCI and received a high bolus dose of tirofiban. Platelet function inhibition was measured using the Ultegra RPFA (Accumetrics) 10 min and 8 and 24 h after the start of therapy in the first 38 cases.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was 98.5%. The mean level of platelet inhibition 10 min after the start of therapy was 94.7 +/- 5.9%. No major bleedings, no need for red blood cell transfusion and no episodes of severe thrombocytopoenia were recorded. Groin haematoma was observed in seven patients (5.3%). The cumulative incidence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events was 4.6% (five myocardial infarctions and one repeat PTCA for sub-acute stent thrombosis).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients undergoing PCI seems to be safe and not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. This high bolus dose may help to further reduce the rate of periprocedural adverse events.

Open-label, sequential comparison of eptifibatide with abciximab for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data comparing different agents.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare in-hospital and 30-day outcomes in 2 sequential cohorts of consecutive patients undergoing PCI at our institution who received abciximab or eptifibatide.

METHODS

The first cohort included patients who received abciximab between September 1, 1998, and January 9, 1999, and the second included patients who were treated with eptifibatide between January 11 and April 27, 1999. Per formulary decision, during the latter period, patients with renal insufficiency continued to be treated with abciximab and were ineligible for therapy with eptifibatide. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were evaluated by one or more of the authors and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were treated with abciximab and 301 with eptifibatide. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the exception of a significantly higher proportion of patients with chronic renal insufficiency in the abciximab-treated group (4% vs 0% with eptifibatide; P = 0.03) The majority of interventions were performed for an acute coronary syndrome. Procedural success was 97% in both groups. Eptifibatide patients were treated for a mean 20.4 (5.2) hours, with 10.1% receiving the drug before the procedure. There were no differences in overall or individual MACEs in hospital or at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest similar in-hospital and 30-day outcomes for abciximab- and eptifibatide-treated patients undergoing PCI.