Serial angiographic follow-up after successful direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Stenting in Acute STEMI Intervention

Stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has the benefits of achieving acute optimal angiographic results and correcting residual dissection to decrease the incidence of restenosis and reocclusion. Studies have shown that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for primary treatment after AMI is superior to thrombolytic therapy regarding the restoration of normal coronary blood flow. Coronary stenting improves initial success rates, decreases the incidence of abrupt closure, and is associated with a reduced rate of restenosis. In the presence of thrombus-containing lesions, coronary stenting constitutes an effective therapeutic strategy, either after failure of initial angioplasty or electively as the primary procedure.

Cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: results from the stent primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (stent-PAMI) trial

BACKGROUND

Although several randomized trials have demonstrated that coronary stenting improves angiographic and clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the cost-effectiveness of this practice is unknown. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the long-term costs and cost-effectiveness (C/E) of coronary stenting compared with primary balloon angioplasty as treatment for AMI. Methods and Results- Between December 1996 and November 1997, 900 patients with AMI were randomized to undergo balloon angioplasty (PTCA, n=448) or coronary stenting (n=452). Detailed resource utilization and cost data were collected for each patient's initial hospitalization and for 1 year after randomization. Compared with conventional PTCA, stenting increased procedural costs by approximately $2000 per patient ($6538+/-1778 versus $4561+/-1598, P<0.001). During the 1-year follow-up period, stenting was associated with significant reductions in the need for repeat revascularization and rehospitalization. Although follow-up costs were significantly lower with stenting ($3613+/-7743 versus $4592+/-8198, P=0.03), overall 1-year costs remained approximately $1000/patient higher with stenting than with PTCA ($20 571+/-10 693 versus 19 595+/-10 990, P=0.02). The C/E ratio for stenting compared with PTCA was $10 550 per repeat revascularization avoided. In analyses that incorporated recent changes in stent technology and pricing, the 1-year cost differential fell to <$350/patient, and the C/E ratio improved to $3753 per repeat revascularization avoided. The cost-utility ratio for primary stenting was <$50 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained only if stenting did not increase 1-year mortality by >0.2% compared with PTCA.

CONCLUSIONS

As performed in Stent-PAMI, primary stenting for AMI increased 1-year medical care costs compared with primary PTCA. The overall cost-effectiveness of primary stenting depends on the societal value attributed to avoidance of symptomatic restenosis, as well as on the relative mortality rates of primary PTCA and stenting.

Infarct artery reocclusion after primary angioplasty, stent placement, and thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The benefits of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are limited by reocclusion of the infarct-related artery, which occurs in 25% to 30% of patients after successful reperfusion. The frequency of reocclusion after balloon angioplasty and stenting in this setting is less well documented. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and timing of reocclusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stent placement during AMI from all available studies compared with previously published reocclusion rates after thrombolysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The previously published thrombolysis data included 4231 patients in 19 studies with > or = 75 patients. Only PTCA studies with > or = 50 patients and stent studies with > or = 30 patients, in which routine angiographic follow-up was obtained in > or = 60% of patients, were included. Ten PTCA studies with a total of 1943 patients were analyzed, with follow-up angiography in 1391 (72%). Reocclusion rates ranged from 5% to 16.7%. The stent studies included 698 patients from 7 studies, with follow-up angiography in 92%. Reocclusion rates ranged from 0% to 6%. With the use of logistic regression analysis with allowance for overdispersion, there was a significantly lower rate of reocclusion after PTCA (odds ratio, 0.38; confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.57; P <.0001) and stent placement (odds ratio, 0.11; confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.22; P <.0001) compared with thrombolysis. Reocclusion after stent placement was lower than after PTCA (odds ratio, 0.28; confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.6; P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reocclusion after PTCA and stent placement during AMI is less frequent than after thrombolysis. This may contribute to the superior outcome of patients treated with PTCA and stent placement in this setting.

Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT)

OBJECTIVES

We sought to directly compare primary stenting with accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis remains the standard therapy for AMI. However, at some institutions primary angioplasty is favored. Randomized trials have shown that primary angioplasty is equal or superior to thrombolysis, while recent studies demonstrate that stent implantation improves the results of primary angioplasty.

METHODS

Patients presenting with AMI were randomly assigned to primary stenting (n = 62) or accelerated t-PA (n = 61). The primary end point was the composite of death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR) for ischemia at six months.

RESULTS

The primary end point was significantly reduced in the stent group compared with the accelerated t-PA group, 24.2% versus 55.7% (p < 0.001). The event rates for other outcomes in the stent group versus the t-PA group were as follows: mortality: 4.8% versus 3.3% (p = 1.00); reinfarction: 6.5% versus 16.4% (p = 0.096); stroke: 1.6% versus 4.9% (p = 0.36); recurrent unstable ischemia: 9.7% versus 26.2% (p = 0.03) and repeat TVR for ischemia: 14.5% versus 49.2% (p < 0.001). The median length of the initial hospitalization was four days in the stent group and seven days in the t-PA group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with accelerated t-PA, primary stenting reduces death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat TVR for ischemia. In centers where facilities and experienced interventionists are available, primary stenting offers an attractive alternative to thrombolysis.

Coronary stenting and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction may be successfully achieved with primary angioplasty. However, angioplasty, as a primary reperfusion strategy, has limitations such as early recurrent ischemia and late restenosis and reocclusion. To improve the short- and long-term results of primary angioplasty, the use of adjunct strategies has been proposed.

METHODS

We reviewed published studies on the effectiveness of primary angioplasty, stenting, and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and identified the advantages and disadvantages of these interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Recent findings suggest that patients may benefit from stenting of the infarct artery and from the use of more potent antiplatelet agents such as platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. In randomized trials that compared primary angioplasty versus primary stenting, stent implantation was associated with a lower rate of death, reinfarction, and especially target vessel revascularization. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors prevented acute ischemic complications after primary angioplasty and primary stenting. In addition to maintaining large vessel patency, these drugs may protect the microvasculature after primary stenting, allowing better functional recovery of the risk area.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery stenting in acute myocardial infarction reduces the rate of restenosis and the incidence of problems related to recurrent ischemia. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors may come to play a key role in association with mechanical reperfusion. However, the cost-effectiveness and long-term clinical outcome of this combined pharmacologic/mechanical intervention require further study before this strategy can be recommended for routine use.

Does primary stenting preserve cardiac function in myocardial infarction? A case-control study. NORTH-981 investigators. Network of revascularisation therapy in Hokkaido

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether coronary stenting limits myocardial injury and preserves left ventricular function.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective multicentre case-control study of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with and without stenting, performed in seven cardiovascular centres.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

45 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with successful primary stenting (Stent group) and did not have restenosis were paired with 45 matched control subjects with acute myocardial infarction treated by successful primary PTCA without stenting, also with no restenosis (POBA group).

RESULTS

In comparison with the POBA group, the Stent group-especially those patients with a left anterior descending coronary artery lesion-had a smaller hypokinesis area (mean (SD): 15. 1 (20.0) v 34.4 (24.3) chords), reduced hypokinesis area/risk area (25.2 (31.9)% v 58.8 (40.1)%), and a larger ejection fraction (63.3 (10.2)% v 51.7 (11.7)%) evaluated by quantitative left ventriculography using the centerline method. In the Stent group, the correlation between risk area and hypokinesis area was significantly shifted downward. Multiple logistic regression analysis on infarct size limitation (hypokinesis area/risk area < 50%) identified preinfarction angina in all subjects and preinfarction angina and stenting in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery lesions as explanatory factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary PTCA using a coronary stent is effective in preventing myocardial injury and restoring left ventricular function in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction.

Stent placement for non-STRESS/BENESTENT lesions: a critical review

Stenting lesions with favorable characteristics as required for inclusion in the STRESS/BENESTENT trials have yielded superior results to that of PTCA alone. Results for less favorable lesions such as in small vessels, diffuse disease, ostial disease, and saphenous vein grafts are less well established. This review seeks to analyze available data for stent placement in this subset of non-STRESS/BENESTENT lesions.

[One-year clinical and angiographic follow-up after primary stenting]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The late reocclusion or restenosis rate of the infarct related artery is frequent after primary angioplasty. An implanted stent may be able to improve the coronary angioplasty results and long-term outcome of these patients. We present the clinical and angiographic outcome of a cohort of patients treated with primary stenting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A group of 74 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and stenting were followed for one year. An angiographic control was performed at the 6th month of follow-up in 91% of patients to assess the restenosis and reocclusion rates of the infarct-related artery.

RESULTS

There were eight in-hospital deaths and three during follow-up (mortality rate 14.8%) and one non-fatal reinfarction (1.5%). The cumulative rate of recurrent ischemia was 6% at 3 months and 15% at 6 months, without any further increment at one-year follow-up. A new angioplasty was performed in 7 patients and three patients underwent surgical revascularization. Thus 80% of patients after discharge were free of events. The angiographic control showed only one reocclusion of the infarct related artery and a restenosis rate of 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that primary stenting is an effective procedure in treating non-selected patients with acute myocardial infarction with a low long-term incidence of adverse events and a low restenosis rate.

A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators

OBJECTIVES

In a multicenter, randomized trial, systematic stenting using the Wiktor stent was compared to conventional balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Primary angioplasty in AMI is limited by in-hospital recurrent ischemia and a high restenosis rate.

METHODS

A total of 211 patients with AMI <12 h from symptom onset, with an occluded native coronary artery, were randomly assigned to systematic stenting (n = 101) or balloon angioplasty (n = 110). The primary end point was the binary six-month restenosis rate determined by core laboratory quantitative angiographic analysis.

RESULTS

Angiographic success (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3 and residual diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 86% of the patients in the stent group and in 82.7% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5). Compared with the 3% cross-over in the stent group, cross-over to stenting was required in 36.4% of patients in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.0001). Six-month binary restenosis (> or = 50% residual stenosis) rates were 25.3% in the stent group and 39.6% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.04). At six months, the event-free survival rates were 81.2% in the stent group and 72.7% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.14), and the repeat revascularization rates were 16.8% and 26.4%, respectively (p = 0.1). At one year, the event-free survival rates were 80.2% in the stent group and 71.8% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.16), and the repeat revascularization rates were 17.8% and 28.2%, respectively (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of primary angioplasty for AMI, as compared with a strategy of conventional balloon angioplasty, systematic stenting using the Wiktor stent results in lower rates of angiographic restenosis.

Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly

Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction present a formidable therapeutic challenge. Although there appears to be a survival benefit from thrombolytic therapy for the eligible elderly patient, persistent concerns regarding the risk of intracranial hemorrhage impedes utilization in this age group. Primary or direct angioplasty of the infarct artery has been proven to be an effective modality for reperfusion. Randomized comparisons suggest an advantage over thrombolysis in terms of achieving superior patency and mitigating recurrent ischemic events. Primary angioplasty expands the reperfusion population by including many patients ineligible for thrombolysis and is more effective for treating patients at high risk, such as those with cardiogenic shock. Acute angiography accumulates important prognostic and decision-facilitating information. The benefits of primary angioplasty are more impressive for the aging patient. The survival gain and reduction in intracranial hemorrhage may combine to magnify the advantages of performing angioplasty on patients in this group. Emerging evidence concerning the aging population validates continued examination of this invasive reperfusion approach.

Long-term follow-up of primary stenting with coil stent in acute myocardial infarction

The authors evaluated clinical and angiographic outcomes for 1 year after primary stenting using coil stent for acute myocardial infarction. Twenty-eight patients underwent primary stenting with coil stent. Follow-up coronary arteriography at 3 months and 1 year was planned in all patients. Procedural success was achieved in 96%. There was no acute or subacute thrombosis. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was increased from 0.08 +/- 0.19 to 2.73 +/- 0.49 mm after stenting. MLD had decreased significantly for 3 months (MLD at 3 months: 2.03 +/- 0.86 mm, p = 0.001). On the other hand, MLD did not differ between 3-month; and 1-year follow-up (MLD at 1 year: 2.26 +/- 0.73 mm, p = NS). Only one patient manifested reocclusion at 3-month follow-up. The cumulative restenosis rate and target lesion revascularization rate at 1-year follow-up were 25.9% (7/27) and 11.1% (3/27). Primary stenting using coil stent is safe and feasible in patients with acute myocardial infarction and may improve clinical outcome and decrease restenosis and target lesion revascularization rate.

The role of coronary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction

Despite the improvements in the pharmacological treatment of acute myocardial infarction, it is recognised that thrombolysis fails to reproduce reperfusion in a significant proportion of patients. Coronary interventional techniques have been shown to offer an alternative reperfusion strategy. There is increasing evidence that mechanical reperfusion may offer significant advantages over established thrombolytic therapy.

Current role of stenting in acute myocardial infarction

Primary infarct artery stenting has the potential to advance treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The postulated mechanisms of the benefit of stenting in acute myocardial infarction are the achievement of an acute optimal angiographic result and correction of any residual dissection to decrease the incidence of early and late restenosis and reocclusion and of the correlated events such as fatal and nonfatal reinfarction and repeat target vessel revascularization for recurrent ischemia. The results of 5 completed randomized trials comparing primary stenting with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty show a lower incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat target vessel revascularization in the stent groups as compared with the angioplasty groups and support the more extensive use of stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The efforts of the next years will be focused on further refinement of stent design and composition and the evaluation of pharmacological agents effective in restoring myocardial reperfusion to the fullest extent.

Primary stenting and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction

Early patency of the infarct-related vessel improves in-hospital and long-term survival. Mechanical reopening is as effective as or superior to pharmacological therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. However, in patients treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, recurrent ischemia occurs in 10% to 15% before hospital discharge, and angiographic restenosis occurs in 30% to 50% of infarct-related vessel within 6 months. Primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction has been found to be safe and feasible and reduces early and late events. In particular, restenosis rate has been found to be lowered by stent implantation. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors alone has resulted in infarct-related vessel patency rates approximately the same as with the use of thrombolytic therapy. Furthermore, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers reduce the occurrence of acute complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Preliminary results of some ongoing trials showed that the combined therapeutic approach (ie, primary stenting plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) in patients with acute myocardial infarction reduces both early and late complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. This finding supports the concept that optimal mechanical resolution of the plaque and the inhibition of platelet aggregation are the key of the treatment of the infarct-related vessel.

Update on mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: which role and when?

Mechanical revascularization in the acute myocardial infarction by primary angioplasty has several advantages over thrombolytic therapy. The short-term patency rates of the infarct-related artery range from 95 to 99% and a normal flow is achieved in more than 90% of the cases. This prompt and effective reperfusion is probably responsible for the improved prognosis with primary angioplasty. The better outcome after primary angioplasty is observed both in low- and in high-risk patients, in all ages and in patients presenting late (>6 h) after the chest pain. Pooled analysis of randomized studies, show that primary angioplasty as compared to thrombolysis, has a lower incidence of death, stroke and reinfarction. Additional advantages of primary PTCA include the possibility of reperfusion in patients in whom lysis is contraindicated or less effective (e.g. patients in cardiogenic shock, or with prior coronary artery bypass surgery) and the ability to provide prognostic information helpful in the patient triage. Thus, primary PTCA results in better outcome than thrombolysis when performed in centers with success rates comparable to those achieved in the randomized trials. Further studies are still needed to assess its long-term efficacy. Several randomized trials are underway to assess the role of stents and the use of more potent antiplatelet drugs, as the GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockers, in adjunct to balloon angioplasty in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Clinical and angiographic follow-Up after primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) stent pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Restenosis has been reported in as many as 50% of patients within 6 months after PTCA in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which necessitates repeat target-vessel revascularization (TVR) in approximately 20% of patients during this time period. Routine (primary) stent implantation after PTCA has the potential to further improve late outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Primary stenting was performed as part of a prospective study in 236 consecutive patients without contraindications who presented with AMI of <12 hours' duration at 9 international centers. A mean of 1.4+/-0.7 stents were implanted per patient (97% Palmaz-Schatz) at 17.3+/-2.4 atm. During a clinical follow-up period of 7.4+/-2.6 months, death occurred in 4 patients (1.7%), reinfarction occurred in 5 patients (2.1%), and TVR was required in 26 patients (11.1%). By Cox regression analysis, small reference-vessel diameter and the number of stents implanted were the strongest determinants of TVR. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 27.5% of lesions. By multiple logistic regression analysis, the number of stents implanted and the absence of thrombus on the baseline angiogram were independent determinants of binary restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of routine stent implantation during mechanical reperfusion of AMI is safe and is associated with favorable event-free survival and low rates of restenosis compared with primary PTCA alone.

[Primary angioplasty is elective reperfusion therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arguments against]

The primary goal of treatment for patients with evolving infarction should be the rapid and sustained restoration of antegrade coronary blood flow. Thrombolytic therapy is an effective and widely available therapy to achieve this aim. However, thrombolysis does not achieve recanalization of the infarct-related artery in 20% of patients and early complete reperfusion (TIMI 3 flow) is achieved in only 50%. Some small randomized trials suggested that primary angioplasty was more effective than thrombolytic therapy in restoring patency and preventing reocclusion of the infarct-related artery. Furthermore, the patients treated with immediate angioplasty had a lower incidence of recurrent ischemia, reinfarction and death than those given thrombolysis. More recently, the GUSTO IIb primary angioplasty substudy, found that primary angioplasty provided only a small short-term clinical benefit over thrombolytic therapy with t-PA, in the combined end-point of death, reinfarction and nonfatal disabling stroke at 30 days. At six months, this small benefit had vanished. The major limitation for primary angioplasty is the restricted availability of the procedure. Only when angioplasty can be performed promptly, in centers with extensive experience in angioplasty and with adequate catheterization facilities and support personnel, may it be used as the reperfusion strategy of choice. Nowadays, for the vast majority of patients, thrombolysis remains the best available treatment for acute myocardial infarction.

Comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary coronary angioplasty with liberal stenting for inferior myocardial infarction with precordial ST-segment depression: immediate and long-term results of a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare randomly assigned primary angioplasty and accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), in patients with "high-risk" inferior acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads and ST-segment depression in the precordial leads).

BACKGROUND

The ST-segment depression in the precordial leads is a marker of severe prognosis in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. The comparative outcome of treatment with primary angioplasty or lysis with accelerated rt-PA has not been investigated.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to either treatment. To assess the in-hospital and 1-year outcome of both treatments the following results were compared: death or nonfatal infarction, recurrence of angina, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the need for repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR).

RESULTS

In patients treated with angioplasty (55) and rt-PA (55) the rate of in-hospital mortality and reinfarction was 3.6% versus 9.1% (p=0.4). Recurrence of angina was 1.8% versus 20% (p=0.002), new TVR was used in 3.6% versus 29.1% (p=0.0003), and the LVEF (%) at discharge was 55.2+/-9.5 versus 48.2+/-9.9 (p=0.0001). There were no hemorrhagic strokes, no emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and identical (5.5%) need for blood transfusions. At 1 year, the incidence of death, reinfarction or repeat TVR was 11% in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group versus 52.7% in the rt-PA group (log-rank 22.38, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary angioplasty is superior to accelerated rt-PA in terms of both myocardial preservation and reduction of in-hospital complications in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and precordial ST-segment depression. Primary angioplasty also yields a better long-term event-free survival.

Intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy for acute myocardial infarction

To investigate the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and values of intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy (ICAT), we applied ICAT to reperfusion therapy using generally available intracoronary catheters to aspirate intracoronary occlusive tissues. We assigned ICAT or primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to patients with evolving AMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial grade 0), and investigated primary histopathologic, clinical, and angiographic outcomes in 43 patients treated with ICAT alone or followed by PTCA, and compared the outcomes with those in 48 patients treated with primary PTCA. No major complications (procedural death, emergent bypass graft surgery) occurred. Reconalization (TIMI grade 3 and 2) was achieved in 25 patients (58%) with ICAT alone and in 39 patients (91%) with ICAT alone or followed by PTCA. Aspirated thrombi were defined as recent thrombi in 21 cases (49%), atheroma in 6 (14%), no thrombi in 13 (30%), and organized thrombi in 1 case. In cases of recent thrombi, ICAT alone provided recanalization more frequently than in those of atheroma or no thrombi (18 of 21 [86%], 3 of 6 [50%], 4 of 13 [31%], respectively; p < 0.05; recent thrombi vs atheroma or no thrombi). There were no significant differences in primary recanalization rate (ICAT alone or followed by PTCA vs primary PTCA; 91% vs 92%) or incidence of complications between the 2 strategies. These results indicate that although the pathogenesis of AMI is heterogeneous in each individual case, intracoronary thrombus contributes little to the pathogenesis of average AMI, and therefore mechanical approaches may be feasible to maximize reperfusion therapies for AMI.

Incidence and predictors of restenosis after successful primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the importance of age and procedural result

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that restenosis and reocclusion occur frequently in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This study was undertaken to assess the incidence and predictors of restenosis in a cohort of patients who underwent successful primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Three hundred twelve patients who underwent successful primary angioplasty of a native coronary vessel were candidates for follow-up coronary angiography. This was performed in 284 patients (92%) at the 3- or 6-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed with the CMS system. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of restenosis.

RESULTS

Restenosis, defined as a diameter stenosis of >50%, occurred in 27% of patients at 3 months and in 37% of patients at 6-month follow-up. Reocclusion occurred in 4% and 6%, respectively. Reference diameter (vessel size) was related to restenosis. Age and lumen diameter immediately after angioplasty were independent predictors of restenosis. Young patients (<50 years) and patients with a minimal luminal diameter of more than 2.5 mm had restenosis rates of <25%. The radionuclide ejection fraction was 46% in patients with restenosis compared with 47% in patients without restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of restenosis after successful primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction is comparable to the reported incidence after elective coronary angioplasty for stable angina. Restenosis is related to age and the lumen diameter after angioplasty and does not affect left ventricular function in this population.

A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare stenting of the primary infarct-related artery (IRA) with optimal primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with respect to clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Early and late restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA after successful primary PTCA significantly contributes to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Coronary stenting results in a lower rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis than standard PTCA in patients with angina and with previously untreated, noncomplex lesions.

METHODS

After successful primary PTCA, 150 patients were randomly assigned to elective stenting or no further intervention. The primary end point of the trial was a composite end point, defined as death, reinfarction or repeat target vessel revascularization as a consequence of recurrent ischemia within 6 months of randomization. The secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis or reocclusion at 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

Stenting of the IRA was successful in all patients randomized to stent treatment. At 6 months, the incidence of the primary end point was 9% in the stent group and 28% in the PTCA group (p=0.003); the incidence of restenosis or reocclusion was 17% in the stent group and 43% in the PTCA group (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary stenting of the IRA, compared with optimal primary angioplasty, results in a lower rate of major adverse events related to recurrent ischemia and a lower rate of angiographically detected restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA.

Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Stent Pilot Trial Investigators

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to examine the safety and feasibility of a routine (primary) stent strategy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Limitations of reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in AMI include in-hospital recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in 10% to 15% of patients, restenosis in 37% to 49% and late infarct-related artery reocclusion in 9% to 14%. By lowering the residual stenosis and sealing dissection planes created by PTCA, primary stenting may further improve short- and long-term outcomes after mechanical reperfusion.

METHODS

Three hundred twelve consecutive patients treated with primary PTCA for AMI at nine international centers were prospectively enrolled. After PTCA, stenting was attempted in all eligible lesions (vessel size 3.0 to 4.0 mm; lesion length < or = 2 stents; and the absence of giant thrombus burden after PTCA, major side branch jeopardy or excessive proximal tortuosity or calcification). Patients with stents were treated with aspirin, ticlopidine and a 60-h tapering heparin regimen.

RESULTS

Stenting was attempted in 240 (77%) of 312 patients, successfully in 236 (98%), with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow restored in 230 patients (96%). Patients with stents had low rates of in-hospital death (0.8%), reinfarction (1.7%), recurrent ischemia (3.8%) and predischarge target vessel revascularization for ischemia (1.3%). At 30-day follow-up, no additional deaths or reinfarctions occurred among patients with stents, and target vessel revascularization was required in only one additional patient (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary stenting is safe and feasible in the majority of patients with AMI and results in excellent short-term outcomes.

A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Among physicians who treat patients with acute myocardial infarction, there is controversy about the magnitude of the clinical benefit of primary (i.e., immediate) coronary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy.

METHODS

As part of the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) trial, we randomly assigned, 1138 patients from 57 hospitals who presented within 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction (with ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram) to primary angioplasty or accelerated thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). We also randomly assigned 1012 patients to heparin or hirudin treatment in a factorial design. The primary study end point was a composite outcome of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and nonfatal disabling stroke at 30 days.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point in the angioplasty and t-PA groups was 9.6 percent and 13.7 percent, respectively (odds ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.97; P = 0.033). Death occurred in 5.7 percent of the patients assigned to angioplasty and 7.0 percent of those assigned to t-PA (P=0.37), reinfarction in 4.5 percent and 6.5 percent (P=0.13), and disabling stroke in 0.2 percent and 0.9 percent (P=0.11). At six months, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the composite outcome (13.3 percent vs. 15.7 percent, P not significant) [corrected]. The primary end point was observed in 10.6 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group assigned to heparin and 8.2 percent of those assigned to hirudin (P=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial suggests that angioplasty provides a small-to-moderate, short-term clinical advantage over thrombolytic therapy with t-PA. Primary angioplasty, when it can be accomplished promptly at experienced centers, should be considered an excellent alternative method for myocardial reperfusion.