Directional coronary atherectomy for the treatment of Palmaz-Schatz in-stent restenosis

Late results (>10 years) of intracoronary beta brachytherapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis

INTRODUCTION

Until the development of drug-eluting stents (DES), diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR) was the main limitation of bare-metal stents in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the different treatments available, intracoronary brachytherapy (BT) emerged as one of the most promising, although it was almost abandoned with the increasing use of DES.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the Portuguese experience with 90Sr/90Y beta brachytherapy for the treatment of diffuse ISR regarding long-term (>10 years) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and angiographic restenosis.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 12 consecutive patients treated between January and June 2001, mean age 58.6±9.9 years (range 43-77 years), 11 male. All had chronic stable angina, 75% had dyslipidemia, 58% had hypertension, 50% had peripheral arterial disease, 42% had diabetes and 50% had multivessel disease. Recurrent ISR was present in half of the patients and 11 had normal left ventricular function. After balloon dilatation, BT was performed using an Sr90/Y90 (Novoste Beta-CathTM) beta radiation source. All patients remained under dual antiplatelet therapy until scheduled nine-month follow-up angiography. Patients were followed for the occurrence of death (all-cause and cardiovascular), non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stent thrombosis and angiographic restenosis. MACE were defined as the combined incidence of cardiac death, MI and urgent target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

In all cases there was both clinical and angiographic success. In a mean follow-up of 10.9±2.5 years, 19 events occurred in seven patients: death in three (25%), only one cardiac (8.3%); ST-elevation MI in one (related to a non-target vessel) (8.3%); and 15 revascularizations in five (42%), of which nine were of the target vessel (mainly in the first two years). There was only one case of probable stent thrombosis. Angiographic restenosis at nine months was 27% (three out of 11 patients), of which two were total occlusions. Ten-year MACE-free survival was 42% (5 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary beta brachytherapy for the treatment of diffuse ISR in this small cohort of patients proved to be safe and efficacious, with no late adverse events related to intracoronary radiation.

Directional coronary atherectomy: a time for reflection. Should we let it go?

A series of interventional tools have emerged since the advent of percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Several are fundamental and used routinely, while others less favourable have fallen short of mainstream therapy and/or have settled as a niche device. We present an overview of the evolution of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA), a unique device that was originally conceived in 1984 to solve the limitations of balloon angioplasty. Unfortunately, we have witnessed its use fall significantly out of favour due to premature and controversial study results. In many interventional laboratories DCA is no longer available. However, we strongly feel that allowing DCA to join the list of extinct interventional tools would be very unfortunate. We, herein, present a series of complex percutaneous coronary procedures to illustrate the convenience of DCA use as a lesion-specific niche device. Finally, DCA offers a valuable distinct clinical research function as it allows for in vivo pathological coronary tissue examination. In conclusion, we plead for its continued production and use as an interventional niche device for the wellbeing of our patients.

Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of a pooled analysis of two randomized studies

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. We sought to compare results of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with those of bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ISR.

METHODS

The results obtained in the stent arm of two randomized studies were analyzed. The RIBS I study (450 patients with ISR) allocated 224 patients to BMS; the RIBS II study (150 patients with ISR) allocated 76 patients to SES. Complete 1-year follow-up was obtained in all 300 patients treated with stents.

RESULTS

Although inclusion/exclusion criteria were identical in the two studies, when compared with patients in the BMS group, patients in the SES arm had more adverse baseline characteristics, more diffuse lesions, and smaller vessels. However, late angiographic findings including in-segment recurrent restenosis rate (11 vs. 38%, P < 0.001), minimal lumen diameter (2.52 vs. 1.63 mm, P < 0.001), and late loss (0.13 vs. 1.04 mm, P < 0.001) were significantly better after SES. The 1-year event-free survival was also significantly improved in the SES group (88 vs. 78%, P < 0.05), as the result of a lower requirement for repeated revascularizations (10.5 vs. 19.6%, P < 0.05). Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measures. After adjusting for (a) imbalances in baseline characteristics (restenosis OR 0.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.36]; adverse events hazard ratios (HR) 0.33 [95% CI 0.13-0.84]) and (b) the propensity score (restenosis OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.03-0.28]; adverse events HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.09-0.66]), results of the SES group were superior to those obtained in the BMS group.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with BMS, SES improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with ISR.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis

We assessed the effectiveness of intracoronary brachytherapy and compared treatment effects for the two radiation sources as well as the performance of the procedure in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and native coronary arteries. Five randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary brachytherapy with placebo involving a total of 1310 patients were reviewed for a meta-analysis. Risk differences (RD) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and angiographic binary restenosis at 6-12 months were computed, and a meta-regression analysis of MACE was performed. For MACE, the RD was 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09%-0.29%; P value, 0.00); there was significant between-study variance of 0.2395. In univariate meta-regression analyses, diabetes was a significant factor for the between-study variance (P value, 0.000). In multivariate meta-regression analyses adjusted for diabetes and lesion length, neither gamma-radiation source nor SVG was a significant factor for the between-study variance (P value, 0.675 and 0.433, respectively); the adjusted between-study variance was 0.000. Intra-coronary brachytherapy is effective compared with placebo at mid-term follow up. Neither procedure in SVG (gamma radiation) nor difference in radiation source (beta or gamma) in native coronary arteries was a significant factor in brachytherapy effectiveness compared to placebo.

Is inflammation a contributor for coronary stent restenosis?

The development of coronary stent has revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology by reducing the incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Despite significant progress in its prevention and treatment, however, in-stent restenosis (ISR) is still common, and remains a challenge for the interventional cardiologist. Restenosis after stent implantation is mainly caused by neointimal proliferation through the stent struts. Currently, there are three major factors has been demonstrated to be contributors for ISR, namely patients-, lesion- and genetic-related factors in large number of clinical trials. However, the triggers and pathophysiological mechanisms for ISR are not fully elucidated. Experimental as well as clinical studies indicate a marked activation of inflammatory cells at the site of stent structs, which are likely to play a key role in the process of neointimal proliferation and stent restenosis. Those data suggest that inflammation may be a major contributor for ISR. In fact, coronary stenting is a strong inflammatory stimulus and the acute systemic response to local inflammation produced by coronary stenting is highly individual and predicts restenosis and event-free survival. Thus, the attention should be paid on anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches for ISR, and the benefit of anti-inflammatory therapy during the periprocedural period and long-term follow-up is dependent on the inflammatory status. Measurement of cytokine and acute phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein, therefore, may be important to identify high-risk subjects and develop specific treatment tailored to the individual patients.

A comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge for interventional cardiologists. Some data suggest that drug-eluting stents (DES) represent a promising new option for the treatment of patients with ISR. Currently, 2 DES platforms are available [sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES)], but the superiority of either approach for treating ISR has not been convincingly demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively compare angiographic and clinical outcomes after treatment of ISR with SES or PES in a series of consecutive patients with ISR.

METHODS

A total of 745 consecutive patients were treated with bare metal stents from April 12, 2004 to December 31, 2004 in our center. Of these, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 54 ISR from 54 patients at 7 months. Of the 54 patients with ISR, 36 received SES and 18 received PES. Follow-up included angiography and assessment of clinical outcome, both performed 7 months after DES implantation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline clinical data (including medication usage and lesion characteristics) between the two groups. Except for overlapping of multiple stents, procedural parameters were also similar in both groups. Seven-month angiographic follow-up showed that the binary restenosis rate was higher in patients treated with PES than that in patients treated with SES (in-stent binary restenosis: 27.8% vs 5.6%, P < 0.023; In-segment binary restenosis: 44.4% vs 13.9%, P < 0.014). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurring during hospitalization or during the follow-up period including thrombosis and TLR was similar in both groups (22.2% vs 8.3%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this small sample size, retrospective, single-center study showed that SES might be superior to PES in treating ISR because of lower 7-month restenosis rates (both in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis) with no increased incidence of MACE.

Implications of the "watermelon seeding" phenomenon during coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis

The occurrence of balloon slippage ("watermelon seeding"; WMS) during treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been described, but predisposing factors and the potential implications of this phenomenon remain unknown. In the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty vs. Elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study, 450 patients with ISR were included. Of these, 42 patients (9%) presented WMS during the procedure. WMS was detected in 26 patients (12%) in the balloon arm and 16 (7%) in the stent arm (P=0.11). In the stent arm, WMS was only noticed during balloon predilation, never during stent implantation. As compared with 408 patients without WMS, patients with WMS had more severe (TIMI flow 1; 21% vs. 8%; P=0.01) and diffuse (length>15 mm: 45% vs. 28%; P=0.02) ISR lesions. Patients with WMS required more balloon inflations, longer total inflation time, had more frequent crossover to stenting or ended the procedure with residual dissections, and eventually obtained poorer acute results (minimal lumen diameter, 2.35+/-0.5 vs. 2.53+/-0.5 mm; P=0.03). In addition, at 6-month follow-up, patients with WMS had a smaller minimal lumen diameter (1.26+/-0.7 vs. 1.61+/-0.7 mm; P=0.007) and a higher restenosis rate (56% vs. 37%; P=0.017). On logistic regression analysis, the WMS phenomenon emerged as an independent predictor of recurrent restenosis (adjusted RR=2.1; 95% CI=1.1-4.1; P=0.04). The WMS phenomenon may complicate treatment of patients with ISR. Long and severe lesions appear to predispose to this technical problem that never occurs during stent deployment. In patients with ISR, WMS is associated with cumbersome procedures and poorer acute and long-term angiographic results.

Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association angiographic classification of coronary lesion morphology in patients with in-stent restenosis. Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The implications of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion classification in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are unknown.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty patients included in the RIBS randomized study were analyzed. A centralized core laboratory assessed ISR classifications including ACC/AHA, the classification of Mehran et al (Circulation 1999;100:1872-8), diffuse/focal, and a new quantitative ISR index (lesion length/stent length). Logistic regression models were constructed for prespecified outcome measures including (1) unsatisfactory acute results and (2) recurrent restenosis rate.

RESULTS

Complex (B2/C) lesions (78%) more frequently obtained unsatisfactory acute results (20% vs 8%, P = .007), smaller minimal lumen diameter after the procedure (2.45 +/- 0.5 vs 2.73 +/- 0.5 mm, P = .001) and at follow-up (1.48 +/- 0.8 vs 1.94 +/- 0.8 mm, P = .0001), and had a higher restenosis rate (43 vs 24%, P = .001) than simple (A/B1) lesions. On logistic regression analysis, all classification schemes were useful to predict unsatisfactory initial results (area under the curve: 0.63, 0.61, 0.59, and 0.62) and recurrent restenosis (area under the curve: 0.60, 0.64, 0.61, and 0.63). The predictive ability of these schemes persisted despite adjustment for potential confounders. Although the ACC/AHA classification was a better predictor of acute results, the classification of Mehran was superior to predict restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACC/AHA classification provides a useful tool to determine acute procedural results and the long-term angiographic outcome of patients with ISR.

Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management

In-stent restenosis is the limiting entity following coronary stent implantation. It is associated with significant morbidity and cost and thus represents a major clinical and economical problem. Worldwide, approximately 250 000 in-stent restenotic lesions per year have to be dealt with. The pathophysiology of instent restenosis is multifactorial and comprises inflammation, smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and extracellular matrix formation, all mediated by distinct molecular pathways. Instent restenosis has been recognised as very difficult to manage, with a repeat restenosis rate of 50% regardless of the mechanical angioplasty device used. Much more favourable results were reported for the adjunctive irradiation of the in-stent restenotic lesion, with a consistent reduction of the incidence of repeat in-stent restenosis by 50%. Data from the first clinical trials on drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis have shown very much promise yielding this strategy likely to become the treatment of choice. This review outlines the histological and molecular findings of the pathophysiology, the epidemiology, the predictors and the diagnostic work-up of in-stent restenosis and puts emphasis on the various treatment options for its prevention and therapy.

Three-year clinical follow-up after strontium-90/yttrium-90 beta-irradiation for the treatment of in-stent coronary restenosis

Because late vessel failure has been speculated as a possible limitation of vascular brachytherapy, we conducted a prospective clinical evaluation at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up after irradiation with strontium-90/yttrium-90 for in-stent restenosis, regardless of the patient's symptomatic status. We report complete 3-year follow-up data for 106 consecutive patients. The cumulative rate of death at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 0.9%, 0.9%, 0.9%, and 1.9% respectively. The corresponding rates for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were 2.8%, 4.7%, 4.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The cumulative rate of late thrombotic occlusion at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 3.8%, 4.7%, 4.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates of target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization were 8.5% and 12.3% (p = 0.046), 14.2% (p = 0.157) and 18.0% (p = 0.046), 12.3% and 18.9% (p = 0.008), and 21.7% (p = 0.083) and 29.2% (p = 0.005), respectively. The cumulative rate of all major adverse cardiovascular events at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 16.1%, 24.5% (p = 0.003), 27.4% (p = 0.083), and 35.8% (p = 0.003), respectively. In conclusion, these results indicate a delayed and, even in the third year after the index procedure, continued restenotic process after beta irradiation of in-stent restenotic lesions.

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and beta-irradiation for the treatment of in-stent restenotic lesions: comparison of underlying mechanisms of acute gain and late loss as assessed by volumetric intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the angioplasty mechanisms of drug (sirolimus)-eluting stent (DES) implantation and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

We performed IVUS in 53 patients (28 DES, 25 VBT) before and after angioplasty of ISR and at 6-month follow-up. Cross-sectional areas of the external elastic membrane, the stent, and the lumen were measured. Plaque + media, peristent plaque, and intimal hyperplasia areas were calculated, respectively.

RESULTS

Clinical and IVUS baseline characteristics did not differ between groups at baseline. After the index procedure, the lumen at the stent site was smaller in the DES group (DES 6.7 +/- 2.0 mm2 vs VBT 7.5 +/- 2.2 mm2, P = .042). Because of less intimal hyperplasia (DES 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm2 vs VBT 0.7 +/- 0.7 mm2, P = .043), the lumen dimensions revealed no difference between groups at follow-up (DES 6.5 +/- 2.3 mm2 vs VBT 6.8 +/- 2.2 mm2, P = .374). At the reference site, the index procedure led to a similar increase of plaque + media (DES 0.9 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs VBT 0.6 +/- 1.2 mm2, P = .150). At follow-up, the plaque + media was significantly smaller in the DES group (DES 8.0 +/- 6.6 mm2 vs VBT 9.9 +/- 7.8 mm2, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-eluting stent for the treatment of ISR more effectively inhibits neointima formation when compared with VBT. Yet insufficient stent expansion might be a reason for device failure and should be avoided. At the reference site, lumen loss by an increased plaque burden, as has been well recognized following VBT, is not present with DES.

Comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes between rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty followed by radiation therapy with a rhenium-188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of rotational atherectomy (RA) with simple balloon angioplasty, prior to beta-radiation therapy with a rhenium-188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (188Re-MAG3)-filled balloon for diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

After completing 50 cases with RA prior to beta-radiation (Group I), we performed optimal balloon angioplasty followed by beta-radiation in the next 53 consecutive patients (Group II) for the treatment of diffuse ISR. The radiation dose was 15 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall.

RESULTS

The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mean length of the lesion was 25.6+/-12.7 mm in Group I and 22.9+/-8.6 mm in Group II (p=0.26). Radiation was successfully delivered to all patients, with a mean irradiation time of 179+/-55 s. The 6-month angiographic restenosis rate was 10% (5/50) in Group I versus 33% (17/51) in Group II (p=0.007). No adverse event including myocardial infarction, death, or stent thrombosis occurred during the 1-year follow-up period. The risk of a target lesion revascularization or a major adverse cardiac event was significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (two patients in Group I vs. nine patients in Group II; OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.96; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant treatment with rotational atherectomy and beta-irradiation using a 188Re-MAG3-filled balloon for diffuse ISR has a synergistic effect, in terms of 6-month angiographic restenosis and 1-year cardiac event-free survival.

Early time course of neointima formation and vascular remodelling following percutaneous coronary intervention and vascular brachytherapy of in-stent restenotic lesions as assessed by intravascular ultrasound analysis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) represents the major limitation of stent implantation. Treatment, although of relative technical ease, is unsatisfactory due to a high incidence of recurrent restenosis. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) has emerged as a powerful adjunct therapeutic modality to treat ISR. Inhibition of neointima formation has been regarded as the relevant mechanism of action. Yet, positive remodelling has been suspected as another contributing factor. Since only very few precise analyses of the extent, distribution and time course of the respective mechanims exist, the goal of the present study was to describe the changes of the vessel geometry at the target lesion and at the reference site following angioplasty and VBT of ISR in 42 patients by means of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) before and after the index procedure and at the 3 and 6 month follow-up. By QCA the acute lumen gain measured 2.2+/-0.8 mm, the late lumen loss at 3 months was 0.1+/-0.5 mm and at 6 months 0.4+/-0.7 mm. By IVUS luminal cross-sectional area increased from 1.5+/-1.2 mm(2) to 7.9+/-1.9 mm(2) (p<0.001). The intima hyperplasia cross-sectional area at 3 months was only 0.2+/-1.0 mm(2) (p=0.191), but increased to 0.7+/-0.6 mm(2) (p<0.001) at 6 months resulting in a lumen cross-sectional area of 7.1+/-1.7 mm(2). Stent dimensions did not show any significant changes over time. The external elastic membrane cross-sectional area at 3 months increased by 1.3+/-1.9 mm(2) (p<0.001), and showed a further increase by 0.7+/-2.9 mm(2) at 6 months. Positive remodelling could be demonstrated also at the reference segment. In conclusion the absolute amount of intima hyperplasia during a 6-month follow-up period after VBT of ISR is low and most pronounced between the third and sixth month. Besides this, predominantly within the first 3 months of follow-up, significant positive remodelling could be demonstrated at the target lesion and at the reference site. Both observed effects may contribute to the preservation of the vessel lumen.

Coronary Endarterectomy and Stent Removal in Patients With In-Stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains the major limitation of coronary stent implantation. Controversies exist regarding optional treatment for ISR. Recently, we developed aggressive surgical options, coronary endarterectomy and stent removal, in this complex setting.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and March 2004, 11 consecutive patients who presented with angina and angiographically severe ISR were treated with coronary endarterectomy and stent removal with concomitant multivessel coronary bypass grafting. There were 10 men and 1 woman. The age ranged from 43 to 75 years old (mean 64.1 +/- 9.6 years). The mean number of target vessel interventions was 1.6 +/- 0.7. Data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in all patients. The mean interval from the last intervention was 4.8 +/- 1.9 months. The mean number of target vessel interventions was 1.6 +/- 0.7. The mean LAD incision length was 57.3 +/- 11.0 mm. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was grafted in situ, as an on-lay patch. Procedural success without in-hospital complications was achieved in all cases, except one patient with low output syndrome. Postprocedure angiography demonstrated that all LIMA patches and LAD arteries were patent and left ventricular functions were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary endarterectomy and stent removal with on-lay LIMA patch is a safe and effective technique used in patients with ISR involving diffuse target vessel disease.

Comparison of acute and long-term results and underlying mechanisms from sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and recurrent in-stent restenosis in patients in whom intracoronary radiation failed as assessed by intravascular ultrasound

In-stent restenosis (ISR), especially after vascular brachytherapy, is a therapeutic challenge. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is a promising new option for the treatment of patients with ISR. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of patients with their first episodes of ISR and with recurrent ISR due to the failure of vascular brachytherapy was compared using intravascular ultrasound imaging.

[Treatment of intrastent restenosis]

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important limitation after stent implantation occurring in 20-30% of patients. Different techniques and treatments have been evaluated in this setting. Repeat balloon angioplasty alone has been rapidly followed by ablative techniques such as laser, rotational atherectomy or implantation of a second stent within the stent. Cutting balloon represents another alternative technique. None of these techniques has proven its superiority over plain balloon angioplasty alone. Brachytherapy is the only effective treatment for ISR by significantly decreasing recurrent restenosis rate at follow-up. However, its use is limited by cost and infrastructure associated with the risk of late thrombosis requiring prolonged antiplatelet therapy. Surgical treatment can be proposed in recurrent ISR as well as medical therapy alone in pauci-symptomatic patients. New drug-eluting stents are under evaluation in this indication.

Evolution of angiographic restenosis rate and late lumen loss after intracoronary beta radiation for in-stent restenotic lesions

The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of angiographic restenosis rate and late loss after successful percutaneous coronary intervention and vascular brachytherapy with beta-irradiation using strontium-90/yttrium-90 in 98 patients who were prospectively enrolled into a quantitative angiographic and clinical follow-up protocol at 6, 12, and 24 months after the index procedure, regardless of their symptom status. Actuarial restenosis rates measured 11.2 +/- 5% at 6 months of follow-up, 24.5 +/- 5% at 12 months, and 28.5 +/- 6% at 24 months, respectively. Late loss of the stent segment during the first 6 months measured 0.38 +/- 0.40 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.25 +/- 0.38 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.16 +/- 0.32 mm), of the injured segment 0.27 +/- 0.21 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.21 +/- 0.26 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.13 +/- 0.24 mm), of the irradiated segment 0.18 +/- 0.29 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.19 +/- 0.31 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.11 +/- 0.27 mm), and of the analysis segment 0.18 +/- 0.36 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.17 +/- 0.29 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.11 +/- 0.20 mm). Restenosis after angioplasty and beta-irradiation of in-stent restenotic lesions is not complete within 6 months but is sustained with a gradual decrease over 24 months.

Randomized trial of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-stent Restenosis (ROSTER)

BACKGROUND

Various autopsy and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown neointimal proliferation as the main mechanism of in-stent restenosis (ISR) responsible for >95% of luminal narrowing while stent struts are not compressed. ISR of diffuse type has a high incidence of recurrence (up to 70%) after balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Tissue ablation with percutaneous rotational coronary atherectomy (PRCA) may be more efficacious compared to tissue compression or extrusion after PTCA for the interventional treatment of diffuse ISR.

METHODS

The Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis (ROSTER) trial is a single-center, randomized trial comparing PRCA to PTCA (both with IVUS guidance) in the treatment of diffuse ISR in 200 patients. In the PRCA group (n = 100), rotablation was performed using a burr-to-artery ratio >0.7 followed by adjunctive balloon dilatation at low pressure (4-6 atm). In the PTCA group (n = 100), high-pressure (>12 atm) balloon dilatation was performed using an optimal size balloon. The study's primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months and secondary end points included clinical events at 1 year and angiographic restenosis in a substudy of the last 75 patients enrolled.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were comparable between the 2 groups with similar procedural and angiographic success, but a higher rate of repeat stenting occurred in the PTCA group (31% vs 10%; P <.001). Although the angiographic acute luminal gain was similar between the 2 groups, IVUS analysis revealed lower residual intimal hyperplasia area after PRCA versus PTCA (2.1 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs. 3.3 +/- 1.8 mm2; P =.005). At a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 2 months, there were 2 deaths, 3 myocardial infarctions, and 3 coronary artery bypass graft procedures in each group. TLR incidence was 32% in the PRCA group and 45% in the PTCA group (P =.042), with a similar trend noted in the angiographic substudy.

CONCLUSION

The ROSTER trial for diffuse ISR revealed both PRCA and PTCA to be safe and effective, but PRCA resulted in less residual intimal hyperplasia, lower repeat stent use, and decreased TLR.

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES

This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events.

RESULTS

Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.

Percutaneous intracranial stent placement for aneurysms

OBJECT

Intracranial stent placement combined with coil embolization is an emerging procedure for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The authors report their results using intracranial stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify all patients with intracranial aneurysms that were treated with intracranial stents. Ten lesions, including eight broad-based aneurysms and two dissecting aneurysms, were treated in 10 patients. Four lesions were located in the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery, two at the vertebrobasilar junction, two at the basilar trunk, one at the basilar apex, and one in the intracranial vertebral artery. Attempts were made to place stents in 13 patients, but in three the stents could not be delivered. Altogether, intracranial stents were placed in 10 patients for 10 lesions. Results that were determined to be satisfactory angiographically were achieved in all 10 lesions. Two patients suffered permanent neurological deterioration related to stent placement. In two patients, the aneurysm recurred after stent-assisted coil embolization. In one case of recurrence a second attempt at coil embolization was successful, whereas in the second case of recurrence parent vessel occlusion was required and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial stents can be a useful addition to coil embolization by providing mechanical, hemodynamic, and visual benefits in the treatment of complex, broad-based aneurysms.

Relationship between neointimal regrowth and mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis with or without supplementary intravascular radiation

We investigated whether neointimal regrowth is related to the mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions both with and without adjunct intravascular brachytherapy. From the WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial) cohort, 54 ISR patients ((192)Ir, 29; placebo, 25) were treated with nonrepeat stenting percutaneous interventions (excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, and/or balloon angioplasty) prior to (192)Ir or placebo therapy. Using Simpson's method, serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses (pre- and posttreatment and 6-month follow-up) were analyzed to obtain stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volumes that were then adjusted for stent length to create stent, lumen, and IH volume indexes. In the placebo group, the acute reduction of neointima (1.6 +/- 1.4 mm(3)/mm) was counteracted by intimal regrowth (2.1 +/- 1.7 mm(3)/mm). The amount of intimal regrowth correlated directly with the intimal reduction due to the intervention (r = 0.76; P < 0.001), but not with the amount of additional stent expansion. In the (192)Ir-treated group, intimal regrowth was significantly less than in the placebo group (-0.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.7 mm(3)/mm; P < 0.001) despite a similar initial intimal reduction (1.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.4 mm(3)/mm; P = NS). No correlation was found between intimal reduction at the time of the procedure and intimal regrowth in the (192)Ir group. In this study, neointimal regrowth following treatment of ISR lesions correlates directly with the extent of acute intimal volume reduction, but not with the extent of additional stent expansion. This relation is not seen in ISR segments treated with radiation, where intimal regrowth is substantially inhibited.

Directional coronary atherectomy vs. rotational atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. Since the mechanism of in-stent restenosis is predominantly intimal hyperplasia, debulking techniques have been used to treat this condition. This study is a nonrandomized comparison of the immediate and long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA; n = 58) vs. high-speed rotational atherectomy (ROTA; n = 61) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in either group. DCA resulted in a larger postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of (2.57 +/- 0.51 vs. 2.14 +/- 0.37 mm; P < 0.0001) and a larger acute gain (1.83 +/- 0.52 vs. 1.42 +/- 0.48 mm; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, 12-month clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (39% vs. 21%; P = 0.02) and long-term follow-up MACE (44% vs. 28%; P = 0.03) was greater in the ROTA group. The present study suggests that DCA appears to be superior to ROTA for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. Compared to ROTA, the debulking effect of DCA leads to a larger postprocedure minimal luminal diameter, and a lower incidence of subsequent target lesion revascularization and MACE.

Can we prevent in-stent restenosis?

Nowadays stent placement has replaced balloon angioplasty as the most commonly performed percutaneous coronary interventional procedure, mainly because of its better acute and chronic outcome. As a result, in-stent restenosis (ISR) has become a widespread problem. The incidence of ISR varies from 10% to 50% and depends on the absence or presence of several risk factors, such as small vessel size, longer lesions, and diabetes. Intravascular ultrasound studies have demonstrated that ISR is mainly caused by neointimal proliferation; consequently, this pathologic process has become the target of many preventive and therapeutic approaches. This article provides an overview of such management strategies, highlighting the rather disappointing experiences with mechanical and systemic drug therapies; the relative merits and disadvantages of intracoronary radiation; and the exciting yet realistic promise, embodied by the recent advancements in drug-eluting stent technology, of potentially eradicating ISR in the near future.

Effective plaque removal with a new 8 French-compatible atherectomy catheter

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new 8 Fr guide catheter-compatible Flexicut directional atherectomy device and to compare it with the conventional Atherocath GTO catheter. The 6 Fr Flexicut catheter has a larger cutting window and a titanium nitride-coated cutter to effect more tissue removal as well as treat mildly calcified lesions. A group of 143 lesions in 117 consecutive patients treated with the Flexicut catheter in four centers were compared with a control group of 277 lesions in 212 consecutive patients treated with the GTO device. Postatherectomy luminal diameters were larger (2.92 +/- 0.79 vs. 2.52 +/- 0.64 mm; P < 0.0001), with more luminal gain (relative gain: 0.58 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.25; P = 0.0007) using fewer directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) cuts (12 +/- 7 vs. 16 +/- 9; P = 0.0001) in the Flexicut group. A residual diameter stenosis < 20% immediately after DCA was obtained in 77% of the lesions in the Flexicut group vs. 45% in the GTO group (P < 0.0001). Histology in the former group revealed large calcium speckles in the retrieved specimens. In the Flexicut group, there was a lower incidence of access site complications and damage to the coronary ostium (2.5% vs. 7.5%; P = 0.08). The new Flexicut catheter is more effective than the conventional GTO catheter with a trend for reduced guiding catheter-related complications.

Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST)

BACKGROUND

Aim of this trial was to compare rotational atherectomy followed by balloon angioplasty (rotablation [ROTA] group) with balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] group) alone in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ARTIST study is a multicenter, randomized, prospective European trial with 298 patients with in-stent restenosis>70% (mean lesion length, 14 +/- 8 mm) in stents, implanted in coronary arteries for >/= 3 months. In the PTCA group, angioplasty was performed at the discretion of the local investigator, and rotablation was performed by using a stepped-burr approach followed by adjunctive PTCA with low (</= 6 atm) inflation pressure. Intravascular ultrasound during the intervention and at follow-up was used in a substudy in 86 patients (45 PTCA, 41 ROTA). Angiography demonstrated no difference regarding the short-term outcome, with equivalent procedural success rates defined as remaining stenosis <30% (89% PTCA, 88% ROTA). However, the results showed that, in the long term, PTCA was a significantly better strategy than ROTA. Mean net gain in minimal lumen diameter was 0.67 mm and 0.45 mm for PTCA and ROTA, respectively (P=0.0019). Mean gain in diameter stenosis was 25% and 17% (P=0.002), resulting in restenosis (>/= 50%) rates of 51% (PTCA) and 65% (ROTA) (P=0.039). By intravascular ultrasound, the major difference was the missing stent over-expansion during PTCA after ROTA. Six-month event-free survival was significantly higher after PTCA (91.3%) compared with ROTA (79.6%, P=0.0052).

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of the primary objective of the study, PTCA produced a significantly better long-term outcome than ROTA followed by adjunctive low-pressure PTCA.

Coronary in-stent restenosis: current status and future strategies

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a novel pathobiologic process, histologically distinct from restenosis after balloon angioplasty and comprised largely of neointima formation. As percutaneous coronary intervention increasingly involves the use of stents, ISR is also becoming correspondingly more frequent. In this review, we examine the available studies of the histology and pathogenesis of ISR, with particular reference to porcine and other animal models. An overview of mechanical treatments is then provided, which includes PTCA, directional coronary atherectomy and high speed rotational atherectomy. Radiation-based therapies are discussed, including a summary of current problems associated with this modality of treatment. Finally, novel strategies for the prevention of ISR are addressed, including novel developments in stents and stent coatings, conventional drugs, nucleic acid-based drugs and gene transfer. Until recently, limited pharmacologic and mechanical treatment options have been available for both treatment and prevention of ISR. However, recent advances in gene modification and gene transfer therapies and, more particularly, in local stent-based drug delivery systems make it conceivable that the incidence of ISR will now be seriously challenged.

Diffuse in-stent restenosis

Stent restenosis, especially the diffuse pattern, has developed into a significant clinical and economical problem. It has been estimated that up to 250,000 patients developed in-stent restenosis in 2,000 alone, two thirds of them can be expected to have diffuse in-stent restenosis, which is difficult to treat because of high recurrence rates. None of the conventionally available interventional treatment modalities provides optimal long-term results. Intravascular radiation therapy is currently the only effective percutaneous therapy for combating in-stent restenosis. Late thrombotic complications have largely been eliminated by extended antiplatelet regimens. Geographical miss, a major reason for recurrence of in-stent restenosis after brachytherapy, can be reduced by an improved radiation technique. The first preliminary data on drug-eluting stents, showing only minimal neointimal proliferation at 6-month postimplantation, could represent a major breakthrough in the quest to solve restenosis.

Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to determine whether cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) has advantages over other modalities in treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Controversies exist regarding optimal treatment for ISR. Recently, CBA emerged as a tool in management of ISR.

METHODS

A total of 648 lesions treated for ISR were divided into four groups according to the treatment strategy: CBA, rotational atherectomy (ROTA), additional stenting (STENT), and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Following the matching process, 258 lesions were entered into the analysis.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar among the groups (p = NS). Acute lumen gain was significantly higher in the STENT group (2.12 +/- 0.7 mm), whereas in the CBA group the gain was similar to one achieved following ROTA and following PTCA (1.70 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.79 +/- 0.5 mm and 1.56 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively; p = NS). The lumen loss at follow-up was lower for the CBA versus ROTA and versus STENT (0.63 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.30 +/- 0.8 mm and 1.36 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001), yielding a lower recurrent restenosis rate (20% vs. 35.9% and 41.4%, respectively; p < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, CBA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17; confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.51; p = 0.001) and diffuse restenosis type at baseline (OR = 2.07; CI, 1.15 to 3.71; p = 0.02) were identified as predictors of target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that CBA is a safe and efficient technique for treatment of ISR, with immediate results similar to atheroablation and better clinical and angiographic outcomes at follow-up. This approach might be implemented as a viable option in management of focal ISR and to prepare diffuse ISR for brachytherapy treatment.

Mechanisms of angioplasty and stent restenosis: implications for design of rational therapy

Restenosis after angioplasty or stenting remains the major limitation of both procedures. A vast array of drug therapies has been used to prevent restenosis, but they have proven to be predominantly unsuccessful. Recent trends in drug therapy have attempted to refine the molecular and biological targets of therapy, based on the assumption that a single biological process or molecule is critical to restenosis. In contrast, both stenting and brachytherapy, which are highly nonspecific, can successfully reduce restenosis after angioplasty or stenting, respectively. This review examines the biology of both angioplasty and stent stenosis, focussing on human studies. We also review the landmark human trials that have definitively proven successful therapies, such as stenting and brachytherapy. We suggest that the successful trials of stenting and brachytherapy and the failure of other treatments have highlighted the shortcomings of conventional animal models of arterial intervention, and gaps in our knowledge of human disease. In contrast to arguments advocating gene therapy, these studies suggest that the most likely successful drug therapy will have a wide therapeutic range, targeting as many of the components or biological processes contributing to restenosis as possible.

Three-year follow-up after rotational atherectomy for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis: predictors of major adverse cardiac events

Restenosis remains the major limitation of coronary stent implantation, especially in diffuse forms of in-stent restenosis. In this study, rotablation (RA) with adjunct angioplasty of in-stent restenosis was performed in 84 patients. Clinical follow-up and control angiography were obtained 6-month postprocedure. The rate of recurrent restenosis after rotablation for in-stent restenosis at 6-month angiographic follow-up was 45%, resulting in a rate of major adverse cardiac events of 35%. At 3-year follow-up, the cumulative event-free survival rate was 57% for the entire population. The only predictor of MACE at 3-year clinical follow-up by multivariate logistic regression analysis was in-stent lesion length. RA for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis is thereby characterized by high procedural success rates and recurrent angiographic restenosis in 45% of patients with diffuse lesions. Major adverse cardiac events occur most likely within the first 6 months postprocedure. Three years after rotablation of in-stent restenosis, 43% of patients had experienced at least one major adverse cardiac event. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:334-340.

Percutaneous and surgical interventions for in-stent restenosis: long-term outcomes and effect of diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

We examined long-term outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) who underwent different percutaneous interventions at the discretion of individual operators: balloon angioplasty (BA), repeat stent or rotational atherectomy (RA). We also examined long-term outcomes of patients with ISR who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis remains a challenging problem, and its optimal management is still unknown.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients (n = 510) with ISR were identified using cardiac catheterization laboratory data. Management for ISR included BA (169 patients), repeat stenting (117 patients), RA (107 patients) or CABG (117 patients). Clinical outcome events of interest included death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and a combined end point of these major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mean follow-up was 19+/-12 months (range = 6 to 61 months).

RESULTS

Patients with ISR treated with repeat stent had significantly larger average post-procedure minimal lumen diameter compared with BA or RA (3.3+/-0.4 mm vs. 3.0+/-0.4 vs. 2.9+/-0.5, respectively, p < 0.05). Incidence of TVR and MACE were similar in the BA, stent and RA groups (39%, 40%, 33% for TVR and 43%, 40%, 33% for MACE, p = NS). Patients with diabetes who underwent RA had similar outcomes as patients without diabetes, while patients with diabetes who underwent BA or stent had worse outcomes than patients without diabetes. Patients who underwent CABG for ISR, mainly because of the presence of multivessel disease, had significantly better outcomes than any percutaneous treatment (8% for TVR and 23% for MACE).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with ISR and in the subset of patients without diabetes, long-term outcomes were similar in the BA, repeat stent and RA groups. Tissue debulking with RA yielded better results only in diabetic patients. Bypass surgery for patients with multivessel disease and ISR provided the best outcomes.

Fate of stent-related side branches after coronary intervention in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the fate of stent (ST)-related side branches (SB) after coronary intervention in patients with in-ST restenosis.

BACKGROUND

In-ST restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Although the fate of lesion-related SB after conventional angioplasty or initial coronary stenting is well established, the outcome of ST-related SB in patients with in-ST restenosis undergoing repeat intervention is unknown.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (age 61 +/- 11 years, 22 women) undergoing repeat intervention for in-ST restenosis (101 ST) were prospectively studied. Two hundred and twenty-six SB spanned by the ST were identified. The SB size, type, ostium involvement, location within the ST and take-off angle were evaluated. The SB TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial) flow grade was studied in detail before, during, immediately after the procedure, and at late angiography.

RESULTS

Occlusion (TIMI flow grade = 0) was produced in 24 (10%) SB, whereas some degree of flow deterioration (> or = 1 TIMI flow grade) was observed in 57 SB (25%). The SB occlusion was associated with non-Q wave myocardial infarction in two patients (both had large and diseased SB). Side-branch occlusion at the time of initial stenting (RR [relative risk] 11.1, 95% CI [confidence interval] 3.5-35.5, p < 0.001), diabetes (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-10.5, p = 0.02), SB ostium involvement (RR 5.0, 95% CI 1.4-17.2, p = 0.004), baseline SB TIMI flow grade <3 (RR 5.5, 95% CI 1.7-18.1, p = 0.005), and restenosis length (RR 1.05 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p = 0.03) were identified as independent predictors of SB occlusion. Late angiography in 19 initially occluded SB revealed that 17 (89%) were patent again. The long-term clinical event-free survival (81% vs. 82% at two years) in patients with and without initial SB occlusion was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Occlusion or flow deterioration of SB spanned by the ST is relatively common during repeat intervention for in-ST restenosis. Several factors (mainly anatomic features) are useful predictors of this event. However, most SB occlusions are clinically silent and frequently reappear at follow-up.

[The practical clinical guidelines of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología on interventional cardiology: coronary angioplasty and other technics]

Interventional cardiology has had an extraordinary expansion in last years. This clinical guideline is a review of the scientific evidence of the techniques in relation to clinical and anatomic findings. The review includes: 1. Coronary arteriography. 2. Coronary balloon angioplasty. 3. Coronary stents. 4. Other techniques: directional atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, transluminal extraction atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser angioplasty and transmyocardial laser and endovascular radiotherapy. 5. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 6. New diagnostic techniques: intravascular ultrasound, coronary angioscopy, Doppler and pressure wire. For the recommendations we have used the classification system: class I, IIa, IIb, III like in the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.

Stenting the stent: initial results and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting for patients with in-stent restenosis

Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge affecting an increasing number of patients. Conventional angioplasty and debulking techniques are currently used in these patients. However, the potential role of a second stent implantation in this setting (stenting the stent) remains unknown. Therefore, 65 consecutive patients (12 women, aged 62 +/- 11 years) undergoing stent implantation (42 elective and 23 unplanned) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (diffuse [> 10 mm] in 39 [60%]) were studied. Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. Three patients developed hospital complications: 1 died from refractory heart failure and 2 suffered non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. During follow-up (mean 17 +/- 11 months) 1 patient died (noncardiac cause) and only 9 (14%) required target vessel revascularization. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was 84%. Using Cox analysis, patients with unstable symptoms, a short time to stent restenosis, nonelective stenting, and B2-C lesions tended to have poorer prognosis. After adjustment, nonelective stenting was associated (adjusted RR 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 10.3, p = 0.09) with an adverse clinical outcome. On quantitative angiography (core lab) restenosis was found in 13 of 43 patients (30%) (75% of those eligible). Logistic regression analysis identify restenosis length (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14, p = 0.04), and time to restenosis (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94, p = 0.01) as the only independent predictors of recurrent restenosis. Thus, repeat coronary stenting is a safe and efficacious strategy for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis. Both elective and nonelective stenting provide excellent initial results. The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of these patients is also favorable.

Clinical trials in interventional cardiology

Several well-designed, randomized trials and registries have recently been completed in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. These studies have further clarified the value of newer pharmacologic and mechanical approaches to patients with atherosclerotic disease and have resulted in improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. As a result, many of the older paradigms of lesion-specific device selection have been revised to include the intricate balance of devices and drugs, tailored to the specific clinical presentation and lesion morphology in patients undergoing PCI. This article reviews several recent clinical trials and discusses their impact on early and late outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for symptomatic coronary artery disease.