Retrograde fast pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentry associated with markedly prolonged PR intervals

Junctional Tachycardia

Junctional tachycardia (JT) is typically considered to have an automatic mechanism originating from the distal atrioventricular node. When there is 1:1 retrograde conduction via the fast pathway, JT would resemble the typical form of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Atrial pacing maneuvers have been proposed to exclude AVNRT and suggest a diagnosis of JT. However, after excluding AVNRT, one should consider the possibility of an infra-atrial narrow QRS re-entrant tachycardia, which can exhibit features that resemble AVNRT as well as JT. Pacing maneuvers and mapping techniques should be performed to assess for infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia before concluding that JT is the mechanism of a narrow QRS tachycardia. Distinguishing JT from typical AVNRT or infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia has notable implications regarding the approach to ablation of the tachycardia. Ultimately, a contemporary review of the evidence on JT raises some questions as to the mechanism and source of what has traditionally been considered JT.

Fast pathway ablation in a patient with PR prolongation

The classical form of typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a "slow-fast" pathways tachycardia, and the usual therapy is an ablation of the slow pathway since it carries a low risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. In patients with long PR interval and/or living on the anterograde slow pathway, an alternative technique is required. We report a case of a 42-year-old lady with idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy, persistent atrial fibrillation status post pulmonary vein isolation, and premature ventricular complex ablation with a systolic dysfunction, who presented with incessant slow narrow complex tachycardia of 110 bpm that appeared to be an AVNRT. Her baseline EKG revealed a first-degree AV block with a PR of 320 ms. EP study showed no evidence of anterograde fast pathway conduction. Given this fact, the decision was to attempt an ablation of the retrograde fast pathway. The fast pathway was mapped during tachycardia to its usual location into the anteroseptal region, then radiofrequency ablation in this location terminated tachycardia. After ablation, she continued to have her usual anterograde conduction through slow pathway and the tachycardia became uninducible. In special populations with prolonged PR interval or poor anterograde fast pathway conduction, fast pathway ablation is the required ablation for typical AVNRT.

Should fast pathway ablation be reconsidered in typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia?

INTRODUCTION

Atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common, regular narrow-complex tachycardia. The established treatment is catheter ablation of the AV nodal slow pathway (SP). However, in a select group of patients with long PR intervals in sinus rhythm, SP ablation can lead to AV block due to the absence of robust anterograde conduction through the fast pathway (FP). This report aims to demonstrate that AV nodal FP ablation is a reasonable approach in patients with AVNRT and poor or absent anterograde FP conduction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Standard electrophysiology study techniques were used in the electrophysiology laboratory. Catheter ablations were performed using radiofrequency energy. Mapping of intracardiac activation was performed with electroanatomical mapping systems. Outcomes were assessed acutely during the procedure and during routine clinical follow-up. Six patients with first-degree AV block and recurrent AVNRT who underwent ablation of their tachycardia at our institution are presented. One patient underwent ablation of AV nodal SP resulting in high-degree AV block necessitating pacemaker implantation. The remaining five patients underwent ablation of the AV nodal FP guided by electroanatomical mapping of the earliest atrial activation in tachycardia. These five had successful treatment of the tachycardia with preservation of anterograde AV nodal conduction. Mapping and ablation approach to eliminate retrograde FP conduction are described.

CONCLUSION

In select patients with AVNRT and poor anterograde FP conduction, retrograde FP ablation is reasonable and is less likely to result in AV block and pacemaker dependency.

Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with a prolonged PR interval at sinus rhythm

Radiofrequency transcatheter ablation is an effective and safe treatment for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia. Slow pathway ablation is considered the ablative technique of choice, but when atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia is associated with a prolonged PR interval at sinus rhythm, a higher risk of delayed atrioventricular (AV) block has been reported. Studies on the subject are few, enrolling low numbers of patients with variable selection criteria and producing different results. Hence, optimal ablation strategy remains controversial. The aim of this study is to review the available knowledge on the topic. Experience from our centers is also briefly reported.

[Invasive electrophysiology: complications, nightmares and their management]

Most minor side effects of ablation in the right atrium and right ventricle relate to femoral venous catheterization but there is a small risk of severe complications including atrioventricular (AV) block, damage of surrounding structures and thromboembolic events. Impairment of AV conduction can occur during ablation of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia, ablation of anteroseptal, mid-septal and parahisian accessory pathways, ablation of ectopic atrial tachycardia originating from the vicinity of the atrioventricular node and when ablating the septal isthmus for typical atrial flutter. Damage of the right coronary artery is a very rare complication after inferior isthmus ablation with high energy. The thromboembolic risk during and after cardioversion and ablation of atrial flutter is higher than previously recognized and anticoagulation therapy decreases this risk. The risk of perforation and tamponade during ablation in the right atrium and right ventricle is very low but particular caution is necessary in thin-walled structures such as the coronary sinus and the upper right ventricular outflow tract. Phrenic nerve injury can be avoided by pacing from the mapping electrode before application of radiofrequency energy at the right atrial free wall. Limitation of power output depending on the site of ablation and titration of energy application with continuous control of temperature and impedance should be considered to minimize the risk of complications.

Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with a Prolonged PR Interval During Sinus Rhythm: The Risk of Delayed Higher-Degree Atrioventricular Block

INTRODUCTION

Delayed higher-degree atrioventricular (AV) block can develop after slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia with a preexisting first-degree AV block. Retrograde fast pathway ablation is considered as an alternative approach for patients with a markedly prolonged PR interval and no demonstrable anterograde fast pathway function at baseline. This study aimed to determine the long-term reliability of AV conduction after retrograde fast pathway ablation in comparison to slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and a first-degree AV block at baseline.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 43 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval (defined as >or=200 msec), 10 patients without demonstrable dual pathway physiology underwent ablation of the retrograde fast pathway, and 33 patients with dual pathway physiology underwent slow pathway ablation. Persisting intraprocedural second- or third-degree AV block requiring pacemaker implantation occurred in one patient (10%) after retrograde fast pathway ablation and in one patient (3%) after slow pathway ablation. During the long-term follow-up of 61 +/- 39 months after retrograde fast pathway ablation, no delayed second- or third-degree AV block occurred, and the PR interval remained unchanged (308 +/- 60 msec vs 304 +/- 52 msec). During the follow-up of 37 +/- 25 months after slow pathway ablation, a delayed complete heart block developed in two patients, and a second-degree AV block developed in two patients. Three patients aged 66, 75, and 76 years died suddenly of unknown cause 4, 16, and 48 months following slow pathway ablation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Slow pathway ablation was associated with a significant risk of a delayed higher-degree AV block in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval at baseline. Retrograde fast pathway ablation for patients with a first-degree AV block and no demonstrable dual pathway physiology was associated with a higher intraprocedural risk of complete AV block but did not result in the development of higher-degree AV block during the long-term follow-up of up to 9 years.

Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and pre-existing prolonged PR interval

The association of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and pre-existing prolonged PR interval is unusual. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation in such patients may be associated with an increased risk of immediate and delayed AV block. The aim of our study is to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of slow pathway ablation in this population. We studied 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) with pre-existing prolonged PR interval of 68 consecutive patients with AVNRT. All had slow-fast subtype of AVNRT. The mean PR interval was 222 +/- 15 ms before RF. The patients with pre-existing prolonged PR were older (69 +/- 15 vs. 54 +/- 17, P = 0.008) and their tachycardias were slower (387 +/- 102 vs. 323 +/- 73 ms; P < 0.05). Transient complete AV block (<5 s) occurred in two patients. None had permanent complete AV block. One patient had a significant increase in PR interval (from 220 to 320 ms). The mean post-RF PR interval was 232+/-37 ms (P = n.s.). Over a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 21 months, none had a recurrence of tachycardia nor developed higher degree AV block. In conclusion, in patients with AVNRT and pre-existing prolonged PR interval, a slow pathway ablation appeared efficient and safe. From our data, no delayed AV block developed on a long follow-up. Most of the patients with periprocedural transient AV block had no evidence of dual AV node physiology, suggesting that, in this population, absence of dual AV node physiology may be associated with a higher risk of AV block during slow pathway ablation.

The tendons of Todaro and the "triangle of Koch": lessons from eponymous hagiolatry

INTRODUCTION

There is growing use of the Todaro tendon and triangle of Koch as anatomic icons for invasive cardiac electrophysiologists. Reasons exist to doubt this validity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Histologic sections were prepared from 96 anatomically normal human hearts. The study area extended from the crista supraventricularis to the eustachian valve and included the AV node and His bundle. This encompasses any tendon of Todaro. Because the purported triangle of Koch includes the tendon of Todaro, all of Koch's available publications were examined. The tendon of Todaro is absent in only one fourth of infant hearts, but in two thirds of adult hearts. Tendons present were less often single than double or more, rarely exceeded 4 mm in length, and were seldom > 1 mm in diameter. Tendons usually originated from the central fibrous body and ended in the eustachian valve. Their origin most often was over the His bundle or its junction with the AV node, rather than the AV node. Tendons were primarily composed of collagen. Koch never described any triangle or acknowledged existence of tendons of Todaro.

CONCLUSION

Todaro tendons are too often absent (or multiple) to warrant use as anatomic landmarks. Without this side of the supposed triangle of Koch, the entire tendon and triangle concept collapses and should be abandoned. There are numerous far more constant anatomic landmarks available to orient one to the human AV node and His bundle; these are briefly reviewed.