Efficacy of invasive strategy for the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance on the clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) that is complicated by profound cardiogenic shock (CS) who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected patients from January 2004 through December 2006 (stage 1); 25 patients who presented with AMI and received primary PCI and had profound CS were enrolled in the study. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) was the only modality for extracorporeal support in our hospital. From January 2007 through December 2009 (stage 2), 33 patients who presented with AMI and received primary PCI and had profound CS were enrolled; for this stage; both intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation and ECMO support were available in our facility.

RESULTS

A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis displayed significantly improved survival for patients in stage 2 (P = .001; 1-year survival in stage 1 vs 2; 24% vs 63.64%). Patients presenting with either STEMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) or NSTEMI (Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) benefited from ECMO-assisted PCI (P < .05). In stage 1, patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation had a very low survival rate; however, in stage 2, the survival rate of patients with and without refractory ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was similar (P = .316).

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted PCI for patients with AMI that is complicated by profound CS may improve the 30-day and 1-year survival rates.

Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients undergoing bypass surgery experience a higher mortality and morbidity.

HYPOTHESIS

The study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and value of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as a bridge to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in high-risk patients with refractory unstable angina or cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

We present 11 seriously unstable patients with severe multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing culprit vessel PTCA. Angioplasty was performed not as a definitive procedure but rather as a bridge to surgical revascularization. All the patients had sustained at least one myocardial infarction prior to catheterization, all had refractory unstable angina, eight patients had only a single patent coronary artery, and five patients were in cardiogenic shock.

RESULTS

Following PTCA, all patients enjoyed a stable in-hospital period. One patient died 12 weeks after successful PTCA while awaiting second CABG. Seven patients subsequently underwent CABG and are doing well. The remaining three patients were also advised to undergo CABG, but elected to continue medical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary angioplasty of the culprit vessel may play a role as a bridge to surgery in critically ill patients.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK trial

OBJECTIVES

We examined the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics determining survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND

The SHOCK (SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?) trial prospectively enrolled patients with shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI). Patients were randomized to a strategy of early revascularization or initial medical stabilization.

METHODS

Patients randomized to early revascularization underwent PCI or bypass surgery on the basis of predefined clinical criteria. Patients randomized to early revascularization who underwent PCI and had angiographic films available for analysis are the subject of this report (n = 82).

RESULTS

The median time from MI to PCI was 11 h. The majority of patients had occluded culprit arteries (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 0 or 1 flow in 62%) and multivessel disease (81%). One-year mortality in PCI patients was 50%. Mortality was 39% if PCI was successful but 85% if unsuccessful (p < 0.001). Mortality was 38% if TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved, 55% with TIMI grade 2 flow, and 100% with TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow (p < 0.001). Mortality was 67% if severe mitral regurgitation was documented. Independent correlates of mortality were as follows: increasing age (p < 0.001), lower systolic blood pressure (p = 0.009), increasing time from randomization to PCI (p = 0.019), lower post-PCI TIMI flow (0/1 vs. 2/3) (p < 0.001), and multivessel PCI (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of coronary blood flow is a major predictor of survival in cardiogenic shock. Benefit appears to extend beyond the generally accepted 12-h post-infarction window. Surgery should be considered in shock patients with severe mitral insufficiency or multivessel disease not amenable to relatively complete percutaneous revascularization.

Does gender affect the clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention?

This study sought to determine the impact of female gender on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) due to predominant ventricular failure undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed gender-related differences in procedural, angiographic, and clinical outcomes in 208 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by CS. Out of 208 patients with CS, 65 were women and 143 men. Women were older than men (74 +/- 10 years vs. 66 +/- 12 years; P < 0.001) and had a greater incidence of a history of hypertension (43% vs. 29%; P = 0.041). The 6-month mortality rate was 42% in women and 31% in men (P = 0.157). There were no differences between groups in reinfarction rate and target vessel revascularization rate. Multivariate analysis showed age as the only variable independently related to the 6-month mortality, while female gender was not related to the risk of death. The benefit of early PCI is similar in women and men, and any potential referral bias in the use of PCI based on gender differences should be avoided.

Percutaneous coronary revascularization improves the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome: a chronological study

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) implies grim prognosis with conventional management. Previous studies of coronary intervention yielded controversial results and were rarely analyzed chronologically. This study was to determine the impact of percutaneous coronary revascularization on outcome by studying two time periods 5 years apart in which the revascularization was more frequent and techniques more refined in the later period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients admitted to the intensive or coronary care unit for ACS in two 1.5-year study periods (Period I: Jan 1994-Jun 1995, Period II: Oct 1999-Apr 2000) were retrospectively screened. Patients who met strict criteria of cardiogenic shock within 24 h of ACS were enrolled. The demographics, management and in-hospital/3-month outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (33M/4F, aged 65+/-8 years) were enrolled in Period I and 32 patients (25M/7F, aged 68+/-13 years) in Period II. The incidence of cardiogenic shock was 11.8 and 9.3%, respectively. The demographics were similar except patients in Period II were older. Significantly more coronary angiography and interventions were done in the later period. The in-hospital (68 vs. 44%, P=0.047) and 3-month mortalities (70 vs. 44%, P=0.03) were significantly reduced in Period II. The in-hospital survivors in two study periods differed only in use of coronary angiography (94 vs. 50%, P=0.005) and interventions (83 vs. 33%, P=0.005) but not others.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous coronary revascularization does improve the clinical outcome of cardiogenic shock when analyzed chronologically. This treatment is warranted in every such patient in the interventional era.

AngioJet thrombectomy and stenting for reperfusion in acute MI complicated with cardiogenic shock

AngioJet thrombectomy (AJ) has been shown to be safe and effective in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, use of AJ has not been studied extensively in AMI with cardiogenic shock (CS). Clinical outcomes in 19 patients with CS and treated with AJ were retrospectively analyzed. Immediate stenting was also performed. Procedure success (final diameter stenosis < 50% and TIMI flow > or = 2) was achieved in 95%, with final TIMI 3 flow in 89%. Clinical success (procedure success without major in-hospital cardiac events) was achieved in 68%. There were five in-hospital deaths and no patients experienced stroke or required emergent bypass surgery. At 30-day follow-up, there were no additional deaths or stroke, and two patients had undergone target vessel revascularization. AJ is relatively safe and effective in the setting of AMI complicated with CS, allowing for immediate definitive treatment. This strategy may offer improved mortality in these high-risk patients.

Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in unselected, consecutive patients after acute percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. This involved a follow-up study from a prospectively conducted patient registry in a tertiary referral center. A total of 59 patients (10 female/49 male; median age 62 years (32-91)) with percutaneous transluminal cardiac interventions in primary cardiogenic shock were identified between January 1995 and January 2000. Twenty-two patients (37%) had been resuscitated successfully before intervention. The in-hospital mortality of shock patients was 36% (n=21, median age 68 (47-84)). The median follow-up of survivors was 18.1 (7-57.3) months, during which three further patients died (8%; two because of sudden cardiac deaths, one because of acute reinfarction). Achievement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow III after acute PTCA (84% in survivors vs. 38% in non-survivors; P<0.001) and the absence of the left main coronary artery (3% survivors vs. 29% non-survivors; P=0.003) as culprit lesion in patients with cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate. A second cardiac intervention was performed in seven patients (18%). Overall functional capacity of shock survivors was good. At final follow-up, 80% of the survivors were completely asymptomatic. One patient had angina pectoris NYHA II, five patients dyspnoea NYHA class II. Exercise stress-test was performed in 24 of the 38 surviving patients, median exercise capacity was 100% (range 55-113%) of the age adjusted predicted value. In unselected patients with cardiogenic shock due to AMI, treatment with acute PTCA resulted in an in-hospital mortality of 36%, low late mortality and good functional capacity in long-term survivors. TIMI flow grade III after acute PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate whereas the left main coronary artery as culprit lesion was associated with worse outcome.

[Elective primary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock: results from a single center]

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of death among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. Conventional treatment for acute myocardial infarction does not achieve a better outcome in these patients, but prior studies with emergency revascularization by coronary angioplasty seem to provide encouraging results.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective study of the clinical and angiographic results of elective primary angioplasty in 48 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction of less than 12 hours is described. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was used in 79% of the patients. Patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to mechanical complications were excluded.

RESULTS

Angiographic success, defined as a residual stenosis < 50% and final TIMI flow >/= 2, was achieved in 85% of the culprit lesions, and stents were implanted in 76%. Multivessel angioplasty was performed in 25% of the patients, and abciximab was used in 35% of the cases. Mean time from the onset of symptoms to angioplasty was 7.4 +/- 3.1 hours. In-hospital survival was 58%, and was 54% at six months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency coronary revascularization with primary angioplasty and intracoronary stenting is effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. TIMI flow >/= 2 is achieved in most patients, and mortality is reduced when compared with conservative treatment in historical series.

Appropriate indications for the use of a percutaneous cardiopulmonary support system in cases with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) is now available for hemodynamic support in patients with cardiogenic shock, but there are no guidelines for its use. The present study determined the appropriate indications for the use of the PCPS in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Sixty-four consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock complicating AMI had hemodynamic support with an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP; n=38) and/or PCPS (n=26). The shock score (0-15) was calculated immediately before starting these support systems to quantify the severity of shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined the clinical factors affecting in-hospital mortality. The relationship between in-hospital prognosis and the shock score was also examined in the 2 groups. The most significant factor related to the in-hospital prognosis was the shock score (p=0.0007; OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.37-3.39). Another related factor was revascularization; however, this relationship did not reach statistical significance (p=0.069; OR 0.06). Among the 13 cases whose shock score was 4-8 (moderate shock), 5 survived in the PCPS group, but only 1 of 19 patients survived in the IABP group (p<0.05). None of the patients in either group whose shock score was more than 9 survived. The severity of shock is the most reliable independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating AMI. Using PCPS in patients with moderate cardiogenic shock may improve their in-hospital survival, but it must be used before the shock becomes severe.

Impact of early percutaneous coronary intervention on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

This study assesses the impact of early percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Predictors of in-hospital death include the need for intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and angiographic failure; long-term outcomes at 2 years in hospital survivors are favorable.

Diabetes mellitus in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the role of diabetes mellitus in cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the SHOCK Trial Registry.

BACKGROUND

The characteristics, outcomes and optimal treatment of diabetic patients with CS complicating AMI have not been well described.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, clinical and hemodynamic measures, treatment variables, shock etiologies and comorbid conditions were compared for 379 diabetic and 784 nondiabetic patients. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between diabetes and in-hospital mortality, after adjustment for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Diabetics were less likely than nondiabetics to undergo thrombolysis (28% vs. 37%; p = 0.002) or attempted revascularization (40% vs. 49%; p = 0.008). The survival benefit for diabetics selected for percutaneous or surgical revascularization (55% vs. 19% without revascularization) was similar to that for nondiabetics (59% vs. 25%). Overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for diabetics (67% vs. 58%; p = 0.007), but diabetes was only a borderline predictor of mortality after adjustment for baseline and treatment differences (odds ratio for death, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.84; p = 0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetics with CS complicating AMI have a higher-risk profile at baseline, but after adjustment, diabetics have an in-hospital survival rate that is only marginally lower than that of nondiabetics. Diabetics who undergo revascularization derive a survival benefit similar to that of nondiabetics.