Analysis of the degree of undertreatment of hyperlipidemia and congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease

National trends and disparities in statin use for ischemic heart disease from 2006 to 2018: Insights from National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

BACKGROUND

Statins are a cornerstone guideline-directed medical therapy for secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, recent temporal trends and disparities in statin utilization for IHD have not been well characterized.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included data from outpatient adult visits with IHD from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) between January 2006 and December 2018. We examined the trends and predictors of statin utilization in outpatient adult visits with IHD.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2018, we identified a total of 542,704,112 weighted adult ambulatory visits with IHD and of those 46.6% were using or prescribed statin. Middle age (50-74 years) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.13 P < .001) and old age (≥75 years) (aOR = 1.66, CI 1.26-2.19, P < .001) compared to young age (18-49 years), and male sex (aOR = 1.35, CI 1.23-1.48, P < .001) were associated with greater likelihood of statin utilization, whereas visits with non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients (aOR = 0.75, CI 0.61-0.91, P = .005) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 0.74, CI 0.60-0.92, P = .006) were associated with decreased likelihood of statin utilization compared to NH White patient visits. Compared with private insurance, statin utilization was nominally lower in Medicare (aOR = 0.91, CI 0.80-1.02, P = .112), Medicaid (aOR = 0.78, CI 0.59-1.02, P = .072) and self-pay/no charge (aOR = 0.72, CI 0.48-1.09, P = .122) visits, however did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant uptake in statin utilization from 2006 (44.1%) to 2018 (46.2%) (P = .549).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial gaps remain in statin utilization for patients with IHD, with no significant improvement in use between 2006 and 2018. Persistent disparities in statin prescription remain, with the largest treatment gaps among younger patients, women, and racial/ethnic minorities (NH Blacks and Hispanics).

Primary Prevention Using Cholesterol-Lowering Medications in Patients Meeting New Treatment Guidelines: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) issued new cholesterol treatment guidelines in 2013. Two of the groups designated for primary prevention were analyzed: patients with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≥ 190 mg per dL and diabetic patients aged 40-75 years.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effects of primary prevention as specified in the 2013 guidelines on cardiovascular event risk and cost.

METHODS

Primary prevention patients were identified using laboratory and diagnostic data for Humana members from 2007 to 2013. Potential study patients were classified into 3 risk groups: elevated LDL-C, diabetes, and elevated LDL-C and diabetes. Patients receiving cholesterol-lowering medications before their index date were excluded. Eligible patients were divided into 2 treatment groups: (1) primary prevention patients who initiated treatment before experiencing any cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related event, and (2) patients who either did not initiate treatment until after experiencing a CVD event or never initiated treatment. The associations between initiating cholesterol-lowering medications for primary prevention and the risk for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. The effect of primary prevention on health care costs was estimated using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

91,066 patients met study selection criteria. Primary prevention rates were the lowest in diabetic patients (35%), who were newly designated for treatment in the 2013 guidelines. Primary prevention rates were higher for patients designated for treatment under earlier guidelines: 65% for patients with elevated LDL-C and 78% for the combined LDL-C and diabetes group. Primary prevention treatment was associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular event risk (up to 37%) and lower total all-cause costs (by $673) in the first post-index year.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating cholesterol-lowering medications for primary prevention, as specified in the ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines, for patients with high LDL-C and diabetes is associated with reduced CVD event risks and lower health care costs.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this study. Han received fellowship support from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association Foundation (PhRMA) during the conduct of this study. Dougherty is employed by PhRMA. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Pharmacist prescribing practices in a clinical pharmacy cardiac risk service

PURPOSE

Prescribing practices within a clinical pharmacy cardiac risk service (CPCRS) and their impact on treatment outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are described.

SUMMARY

National healthcare reforms have increased the population of insured patients and placed increased demands on physicians and other providers. Pharmacists are well trained and positioned to aid in patient care by providing expertise in medication management and patient safety that can result in pharmacotherapy optimization and cost savings. Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), a group-model health maintenance organization with about 675,000 members served by 30 medical offices throughout Colorado, has adopted a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) model that enables pharmacist prescribing to improve patient access, patient care, and healthcare cost-effectiveness. Within the CPCRS established by KPCO, qualified pharmacists are permitted to prescribe initial therapy, modify drug regimens, order laboratory tests, and perform follow-up activities within their professional scope of practice. The CPCRS focuses on the long-term management of patients with ASCVD. The primary goals of the CPCRS are to optimize secondary-prevention pharmacotherapy, monitor and ensure medication adherence, assist in the management of risk factors for ASCVD, provide patient education and counseling, and serve as a resource for physicians and other healthcare providers. Working under a CDTM agreement, pharmacists are authorized to prescribe therapies to minimize the risk of future ASCVD events.

CONCLUSION

The CPCRS at KPCO has demonstrated successful maintenance of a clinical pharmacy service including pharmacist prescribing under a CDTM model to manage patients with ASCVD.

Real-World Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Male and Female Outpatients with Coronary Heart Disease: Relation to Pre-Treatment Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol, Pre-Treatment Coronary Heart Disease Risk, and other Factors

Background

Determinants of the real-world effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy have been rarely assessed in an unselected observational coronary heart disease (CHD) community cohort over time.

Design

Randomly drawn patients (n = 605) from randomly drawn practices (n = 62) were retrospectively followed for a median of 3.6 years (1998-2002) on lipid-lowering therapy (98% statins).

Methods

Coronary heart disease population-averaged estimates and variances accounting for repeated measurements within patients were obtained using generalized estimating equations.

Results

Post-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was 124 mg/dl in men and 141 mg/dl in women and was independently associated (all P<0.05) with pre-treatment LDL-C (+ 3.7 mg/dl per 10 mg/dl increment), female sex (+ 14.0 mg/dl), coronary bypass (-9.5 mg/dl), drug-treated diabetes mellitus (-6.8 mg/dl), and era 2002/2001 versus 1999/2000 (- 6.4 mg/dl) in age-adjusted multivariate analyses. Holding pre-treatment LDL-C constant post-treatment LDL-C was associated with pre-treatment Framingham CHD risk in men (- 13.9 mg/dl per doubling of risk), whereas LDL-C control in women resembled that in low-risk men. The likelihood of attaining LDL-C < 100 mg/dl was 0.28 in men and 0.17 in women and was likewise associated with the above factors.

Conclusion

Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol control remained low despite lipid-lowering therapy across a wide range of pre-treatment LDL-C and pre-treatment CHD risk. Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol control in women was inferior to that in men, a finding that warrants attention and clarification. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12:37-45 © 2005 The European Society of Cardiology

Combined Effects of Rosuvastatin and Exercise on Gene Expression of Key Molecules Involved in Cholesterol Metabolism in Ovariectomized Rats

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of three weeks of rosuvastatin (Ros) treatment alone and in combination with voluntary training (Tr) on expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism (LDLR, PCSK9, LRP-1, SREBP-2, IDOL, ACAT-2 and HMGCR) in the liver of eight week-old ovariectomized (Ovx) rats. Sprague Dawley rats were Ovx or sham-operated (Sham) and kept sedentary for 8 weeks under a standard diet. Thereafter, rats were transferred for three weeks in running wheel cages for Tr or kept sedentary (Sed) with or without Ros treatment (5mg/kg/day). Six groups were formed: Sham-Sed treated with saline (Sal) or Ros (Sham-Sed-Sal; Sham-Sed-Ros), Ovx-Sed treated with Sal or Ros (Ovx-Sed-Sal; Ovx-Sed-Ros), Ovx trained treated with Sal or Ros (Ovx-Tr-Sal; Ovx-Tr-Ros). Ovx-Sed-Sal rats depicted higher (P < 0.05) body weight, plasma total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C, and liver TC content compared to Sham-Sed-Sal rats. In contrast, mRNA levels of liver PCSK9, LDLR, LRP-1 as well as plasma PCSK9 concentrations and protein levels of LRP-1 were reduced (P < 0.01) in Ovx-Sed-Sal compared to Sham-Sed-Sal rats. However, protein levels of LDLR increased (P < 0.05) in Ovx-Sed-Sal compared to Sham-Sed-Sal rats. Treatment of Ovx rats with Ros increased (P < 0.05) mRNA and protein levels of LRP-1 and PCSK9 but not mRNA levels of LDLR, while its protein abundance was reduced at the level of Sham rats. As a result, plasma LDL-C was not reduced. Exercise alone did not affect the expression of any of these markers in Ovx rats. Overall, Ros treatment corrected Ovx-induced decrease in gene expression of markers of cholesterol metabolism in liver of Ovx rats, but without reducing plasma LDL-C concentrations. Increased plasma PCSK9 levels could be responsible for the reduction of liver LDLR protein abundance and the absence of reduction of plasma LDL-C after Ros treatment.

Intensive nursing care by an electronic followup system to promote secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of an intensive nursing care electronic followup system for cardiovascular risk management after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In total, 840 subjects who underwent PCI in a single hospital in Beijing between January 2010 and January 2012 were enrolled. All subjects were randomized into the control and intensive nursing care groups (n = 420 each group). Both groups received standard secondary prevention according to guidelines. The control group received regular followup while the intensive nursing care group was closely monitored and followed by specific nursing staff with the electronic followup system.

RESULTS

In total, 807 subjects were followed up for 1 year. Compared with subjects in the control group, those in the intensive group had decreased levels of total cholesterol (3.99 ± 1.08 vs 3.76 ± 0.98; P < .05), systolic blood pressure (142.41 ± 11.53 vs 135.71 ± 14.57 mm Hg; P < .05), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (2.72 ± 1.01 vs 2.42 ± 0.81; P < .05), and body mass index (25.13 ± 5.12 vs 24.23 ± 6.22; P < .05); a higher percentage with target LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (66.99% vs 47.88%; P < .05); increased use of medication including aspirin (96.51% vs 99.26%; P < .05), clopidogrel (87.53% vs 98.77%; P < .05), statins (52.62% vs 93.10%; P < .05), β-blockers (48.63% vs 61.33%; P < .05), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (32.92% vs 61.82%; P < .05); and better dietary control and physical exercise (55.66% vs 26.18%, P < .05; 62.56% vs 38.65%, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive nursing care by the electronic followup system may lead to an improvement in quality of secondary prevention after PCI, including risk factor control, the use of medication, and self-management abilities.

Gender disparities in optimal lipid control among patients with coronary artery disease

Coronary heart disease(CHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide in both men and women. Hypercholesterolemia is a major factor contributing to the incidence of CHD. Many lipid-lowering trials have shown statins to be effective medications for the primary and secondary prevention of CHD. Some studies have suggested that statins are as or more effective in women than in men. However, there is a substantial gender gap in lipid goal attainment with respect to primary care guidelines, as reported in observational studies. In this article, we attempt to explain gender differences in lipid control in individuals with or at risk of CHD in order to improve awareness of and narrow gaps in gender disparities in lipid management.

Ambulatory treatment gaps in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated goal attainment for patients with a history of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged 18 to 85 years with a history of validated NCIS or TIA. Data collected were demographics, comorbidities, blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, and medications within 365 days and most proximal to December 31, 2010. Goal LDL-C and BP were defined as < 100 mg/dL and < 140/90 mm Hg, respectively. Differences in sex and age (< 65 vs ≥ 65 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 1731 patients evaluated (mean age: 73.6 years; 58% women). Stroke type was NCIS in 51.9% and TIA in 48.1%. The LDL-C and BP were measured in 75.4% and 50.3% of patients, respectively. No difference in LDL-C screening rates existed for sex or age. Men and patients younger than age 65 years were significantly more likely to have BP measured. Overall, LDL-C and BP goals were attained by 48.9% and 43.3% of patients, respectively. Men and patients age 65 years or older were likelier than women and patients younger than age 65 years to attain LDL-C goals (p < 0.01). Men were also likelier than women to attain BP < 140/90 mm Hg (p < 0.01), but more patients younger than age 65 years vs older than age 65 years attained this goal (p < 0.01). Statins and antihypertensives were received by 51.9% and 46.9% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although attaining guideline-recommended goals for LDL-C and BP may present challenges, future research should focus on innovative methods to help patients attain optimal treatment goals.

Targeting the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 for the treatment of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, increasing the incidence of myocardial infarction and death. Statin-induced lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, many individuals treated with statins do not achieve their target levels of LDL-C, and thus, LDL-associated residual risk remains. Gain-of-function mutations of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) are associated with hypercholesterolemia and increased risk of cardiovascular events. Conversely, loss-of-function mutations are linked to low plasma LDL-C levels and a reduction of cardiovascular risk without known unwanted effects on individual health. Experimental studies have revealed that PCSK9 reduces the hepatic uptake of LDL-C by increasing the endosomal and lysosomal degradation of LDL receptors (LDLR). Low intracellular cholesterol levels in response to statin treatment activate the sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 (SREBP-2), resulting in coexpression of LDLR and PCSK9. Although this self-regulatory mechanism contributes to maintain cholesterol homeostasis preventing excessive cholesterol uptake, it may limit the therapeutic effect of statins. A number of clinical studies have demonstrated that inhibition of PCSK9 alone and in addition to statins potently reduces serum LDL-C concentrations. Moreover, experimental studies indicate that PCSK9 might accelerate atherosclerosis by promoting inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and hypertension by mechanisms independent of the LDLR. Further research is needed to characterize the potential therapeutic and to rule out unwanted off-target effects of PCSK9 inhibition. In this review we elucidate the role of PCSK9 in lipid homeostasis, highlight the impact of PCSK9 on atherosclerosis, and summarize current therapeutic strategies targeting PCSK9.

Influence of patients' coronary artery calcium on subsequent medication use patterns

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether information on the presence and extent of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is associated with the likelihood of physicians' prescribing preventive therapies.

METHOD

In a longitudinal design, asymptomatic participants (N=510) were evaluated by computed tomography for CAC. Changes to medications were at the discretion of the patient's primary care provider, who received the CT report.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis, the likelihood of patients reporting that their primary care physician prescribed preventive therapies was significantly associated with the presence and extent of CAC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that physicians' prescribing practices are influenced by patients' CAC scores obtained via CT.

High performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous quantification of pravastatin and aspirin in human plasma: Pharmacokinetic application

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) assay method has been developed and fully validated for the simultaneous quantification of pravastatin and aspirin in human plasma. Furosemide was used as an internal standard. Analytes and the internal standard were extracted from human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction technique using methyl tertiary butyl ether. The reconstituted samples were chromatographed on a Zorbax SB-C18 column by using a mixture of 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer and acetonitrile (20:80, v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The calibration curve obtained was linear (r≥0.99) over the concentration range of 0.50-600.29 ng/mL for pravastatin and 20.07-2012.00 ng/mL for aspirin. Method validation was performed as per FDA guidelines and the results met the acceptance criteria. A run time of 2.0 min for each sample made it possible to analyze more than 400 human plasma samples per day. The proposed method was found to be applicable to clinical studies.

Collaborative cardiac care service: a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death in the US. In 1996, Kaiser Permanente of Colorado (KPCO) developed the Collaborative Cardiac Care Service (CCCS) with the goal of improving the health of patients with CAD.

DESCRIPTION

CCCS consists of a nursing team (the KP Cardiac Rehabilitation program) and a pharmacy team (the Clinical Pharmacy Cardiac Risk Service). CCCS works collaboratively with patients, primary care physicians, cardiologists, and other health care professionals to coordinate proven cardiac risk reduction strategies for patients with CAD. Activities such as lifestyle modification, medication initiation and adjustment, patient education, laboratory monitoring, and management of adverse events are all coordinated through CCCS. The CCCS uses an electronic medical record and patient-tracking software to document all interactions with patients, track patient appointments, and collect data for evaluation of both short- and long-term outcomes.

OUTCOMES

The CCCS currently follows over 12,000 patients with CAD. The CCCS has demonstrated improvement in surrogate outcomes including: cholesterol screening (55% to 96.3%), the proportion of patients with a goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) <100 mg/dL (22% to 76.9%), and has reduced the average LDL-c to 78.3 mg/dL for the CAD population it follows. The CCCS has shown a reduction in all-cause mortality associated with CAD by 76% in the patients followed by the service. Patient and physician satisfaction have been high with CCCS.

CONCLUSION

The CCCS coordinates many aspects of cardiac risk reduction care resulting in excellent continuity of care. The CCCS has continued to grow and expand the number of patients enrolled by using innovative strategies and technology and has resulted in excellent care and improved outcomes of the CAD population at KPCO.

Combination rosuvastatin plus fenofibric acid in a cohort of patients 65 years or older with mixed dyslipidemia: subanalysis of two randomized, controlled studies

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease risk increases with advancing age and is further increased in patients with mixed dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and high triglycerides (TG). Combination lipid therapy is an option; however, efficacy and safety data among elderly patients are lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

The combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid (R + FA) results in more comprehensive lipid improvements than corresponding-dose monotherapies, without additional safety concerns, in elderly patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis evaluated data from patients age ≥ 65 years (n = 401) with mixed dyslipidemia (LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL, HDL-C < 40 mg/dL [men] or < 50 mg/dL [women], and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL) in 2 randomized studies. Patients included in this analysis received either monotherapy (as R 5, 10, or 20 mg or FA 135 mg), or combination therapy with R (5, 10, or 20 mg) + FA 135 mg, for 12 weeks. Data were pooled and analyzed, and mean/median percent changes in multiple lipid parameters and biomarkers were compared.

RESULTS

Combination therapy decreased LDL-C by 31.8%-47.2% vs 10.6% with FA monotherapy (P < 0.001). Combination therapy also increased HDL-C by 21.9%-27.0% vs 5.9%-9.9% with R monotherapy (P < 0.001), and decreased TG by 48.3%-53.5% vs 20.7%-32.8% with R monotherapy (P < 0.001). In general, safety profiles were consistent between combination therapy and individual monotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In these elderly patients with mixed dyslipidemia, R 5, 10, or 20 mg in combination with FA 135 mg improved the overall lipid profile, without new or unexpected safety issues.

Severe hypercholesterolaemia: therapeutic goals and eligibility criteria for LDL apheresis in Europe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the use of currently available lipid-lowering therapies, a significant proportion of patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia do not reach treatment goals and consequently remain at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). On the basis of clinical experience, these patients tend to have the most severe forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia or markedly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels but are unable to tolerate statin therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

LDL apheresis is currently the best treatment option (or treatment rescue) to bring these patients closer to therapeutic LDL objectives, and has been shown to reduce the risk of CVD along with LDL-C levels. However, criteria for LDL apheresis eligibility and the percentage of patients receiving treatment vary widely from country to country across Europe. Despite the proven benefits of LDL apheresis, access to this procedure remains limited because of its high cost and low availability, reflecting inherent limitations of this treatment modality.

SUMMARY

There is a need to both better define the patient population eligible for LDL apheresis and to create unified European guidelines governing the use of apheresis. In addition to improving access to apheresis where appropriate, new therapies are needed to further decrease LDL-C and reduce the ongoing CVD risk in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia.

Randomized Trial of a Pharmacist-Delivered Intervention for Improving Lipid-Lowering Medication Adherence among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

A randomized trial of a pharmacist-delivered intervention (PI) versus usual care (UC) was conducted; 689 subjects with known coronary heart disease were recruited from cardiac catheterization laboratories. Participants in the PI condition received 5 pharmacist-delivered telephone counseling calls post-hospital discharge. At one year, 65% in the PI condition and 60% in the UC condition achieved an LDL-C level <100 mg/dL (P = .29); mean statin adherence was 0.88 in the PI, and 0.90 in the UC (P = .51). The highest percentage of those who reached the LDL-C goal were participants who used statins as opposed to those who did not use statins (67% versus 58%, P = .05). However, only 53% and 56% of the patients in the UC and PI conditions, respectively, were using statins. We conclude that a pharmacist-delivered intervention aimed only at improving patient adherence is unlikely to positively affect outcomes. Efforts must be oriented towards influencing physicians to increase statin prescription rates.

Extent of control of cardiovascular risk factors and adherence to recommended therapies in US multiethnic adults with coronary heart disease: from a 2005-2006 national survey

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for cardiovascular risk factor control in people with coronary heart disease (CHD) focus on compliance with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers), angiotensin receptor blockade (ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists [angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs]) [ACE/ARBs], and lipid-lowering agents, with goals for BP of <140/90 mmHg and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). Most data derive from registries of hospitalized patients or are from clinical trials. Little data exist on goal attainment and adherence with therapy among CHD survivors of major US ethnic groups in the real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed levels of cardiovascular risk factor control and adherence with recommended therapies among US CHD survivors.

METHODS

We identified 364 US adults (representing 12.8 million in the US with CHD) aged 18 years and over in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-6 with known CHD. We calculated proportions of patients who were receiving recommended treatments, and who achieved goal targets for BP, LDL-C levels, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), and nonsmoking status, and differences between actual and goal levels ('distance to goal'), stratified by sex and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Overall, 58%, 38%, and 60% of CHD survivors were receiving beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, ACE/ARBs, and lipid-lowering medications, respectively (22% received all three). However, treatment rates for beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and lipid-lowering agents were lower (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01) in Hispanics (36% and 27%, respectively) and non-Hispanic Blacks (47% and 42%, respectively) than in non-Hispanic Whites. Moreover, lipid-lowering treatment rates were lower in females (50%) than in males (67%) [p < 0.01]. Overall, 78% were nonsmokers while 68% achieved goal levels for BP, 57% for LDL-C levels, and, if diabetic, 67% for HbA(1c). Only 12% met all four goals. Non-Hispanic Whites had the lowest SBP and DBP as well as HbA(1c) (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01 across ethnicity). In those who did not achieve goal levels, distance to goal averaged 1.0 mmol/L (37.0 mg/dL) for LDL-C levels, 15.6 mmHg for SBP, and 1.3% for HbA(1c).

CONCLUSION

Despite clear treatment guidelines, we show that many US adults with CHD, especially Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks, are neither receiving recommended treatments nor adequately treated in terms of BP, LDL-C levels, and HbA(1c). Greater efforts by healthcare systems to disseminate and implement guidelines are needed.

Are quality improvements associated with the Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) program sustained over time? A longitudinal comparison of GWTG-CAD hospitals versus non-GWTG-CAD hospitals

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have demonstrated that participation in GWTG-CAD, a national quality initiative of the American Heart Association, is associated with improved guideline adherence for patients hospitalized with CAD. We sought to establish whether these benefits from participation in GWTG-CAD were sustained over time.

METHODS

We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Compare database to examine 6 performance measures and one composite score for 3 consecutive 12-month periods including aspirin and beta-blocker on arrival/discharge, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), and adult smoking cessation counseling. The differences in guideline adherence between the GWTG-CAD hospitals (n = 440, 439, 429) and non-GWTG-CAD hospitals (n = 2,438, 2,268, 2,140) were evaluated for each 12-month period. A multivariate mixed-effects model was used to estimate the independent effect of GWTG-CAD over time adjusting for hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with non-GWTG hospitals, the GWTG-CAD hospitals demonstrated higher guideline adherence for 6 performance measures. The largest differences existed for (1) aspirin at arrival (2.3%, 2.1%, and 1.6% for each 12-month period, respectively), (2) aspirin at discharge (3.4%, 2.2%, and 2.3%), (3) beta-blocker at arrival (3.4%, 2.9%, and 2.6%), and (4) beta-blocker at discharge (2.8%, 1.8%, and 1.5%). In multivariate analysis, the GWTG-CAD hospitals were independently associated with better adherence for 4 of the 6 measures (the exceptions were ACE-I for LVSD and smoking cessation counseling). Superior performance was also found for the composite measures. Although there was some narrowing between groups, GWTG-CAD hospitals maintained superior guideline adherence than non-GWTG-CAD hospitals for the entire 3-year period (adjusted differences 1.8%, 1.6%, and 1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals participating in GWTG-CAD had modestly superior acute cardiac care and secondary prevention measures performance relative to non-GWTG-CAD. These benefits of GWTG-CAD participation were sustained over time and independent of hospital characteristics.

Evidence for the insufficient evaluation and undertreatment of chronic hepatitis B infection in a predominantly low-income and immigrant population

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Many physicians remain unaware of contemporary treatments for chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection and do not treat their HBV-infected patients or refer them for treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine the rates of laboratory evaluation and treatment of HBV infection in a predominantly low-income and immigrant population.

METHODS

We identified adult patients who tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen between 1 January 1994 and 30 April 2006. We reviewed patients' medical records to determine two outcomes: (i) receipt of pretreatment evaluation of HBV infection; and (ii) receipt of HBV treatment. We then examined clinical and demographic factors associated with these outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight percent of 1231 HBV surface antigen-positive patients received additional laboratory evaluation of their infection. In a multivariate analysis, receipt of a HBV evaluation was independently associated with (P < 0.05) female sex, longer duration of HBV infection, more visits to a gastroenterology clinic and less recent health-care contact. Data on treatment were available for 56% of patients; among these, 16% received HBV treatment. In the multivariate analysis, receipt of HBV treatment was independently associated with (P < 0.05) HIV co-infection, receipt of liver biopsy, testing for hepatitis B e antigen or HBV DNA, longer duration of HBV infection, more visits to a gastroenterology clinic and more recent health-care contact. When excluding HIV-infected patients, only 10% of patients received HBV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

After the diagnosis of HBV infection, few patients in our population received laboratory evaluation to determine eligibility for HBV treatment. Furthermore, only a small percentage received HBV treatment. Further research needs to be done to validate these findings in other populations and understand barriers to receiving HBV treatment.

Acute coronary syndrome emergency treatment strategies: a rationale and road map for critical pathway implementation

Clinical guidelines have been established to improve the effectiveness of treatment of patients seeking treatment for acute coronary syndromes and to address the variability in physician approaches to these risks. In patients with established coronary heart disease, clinical trials have consistently demonstrated reduction in morbidity and mortality with secondary prevention therapies. Both ends of this spectrum of therapy can be underused in patients receiving conventional care. Because implementation of evidence-based guideline recommendations into clinical care is limited, presented here is a rationale and process that have been successful in guideline implementation for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

In-hospital initiation of cardiovascular protective therapies to improve treatment rates and clinical outcomes: the University of California-Los Angeles, Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program

Despite the scientific evidence that secondary prevention medical therapies reduce mortality in patients with established atherosclerosis, these therapies continue to be underused in patients receiving conventional care. To address this issue, the University of California, Los Angeles, Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program was implemented in 1994. This hospital-based system focused on initiation of antiplatelet therapy, beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and statin therapy (irrespective of baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) in conjunction with diet and exercise counseling in patients hospitalized with coronary artery and other atherosclerotic vascular disease. Preprinted orders, critical pathways, discharge forms, physician and nursing education, pocket cards, patient educational material, and treatment utilization reports facilitated program implementation. Statin use at the time of discharge increased from 6% before initiation of the program to 86% after the Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program was implemented (P < 0.001). Improved use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was also observed. Importantly, in-hospital initiation of cardiovascular protective therapies had a dramatic effect on long-term treatment rates and patient compliance. The improved use of cardiovascular protective therapies was associated with a significant reduction in clinical events the first year after discharge: the death and nonfatal myocardial infarction rate decreased from 14.8% to 6.4% (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.59; P < 0.01). These improved treatment rates have been sustained over an 8-year period. Compared with conventional care, the Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program has been associated with a significant increase in treatment utilization of evidence-based medications, more patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than 100 mg/dL, and improved clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease. Hospital-based atherosclerosis treatment systems are an important step to help eliminate the cardiovascular treatment gap and dramatically reduce the death and disability caused by atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Improving outcomes in high-risk populations using REACH: an inpatient cardiac risk reduction program

The high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its associated mortality rates mandate that risk reduction strategies be addressed in high-risk populations, including those diagnosed with atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Hospital-based systems that can identify and guide management of these high-risk populations can be effective adjuncts to patient care.In 2001, an inpatient cardiovascular risk assessment program called REACH was developed at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital (ALGH), a community teaching hospital in Illinois. REACH uses an intranet-based data repository capable of prospectively identifying high-risk patients by displaying an alert on the inpatient computerized medical record. Management and education protocols are accessed through various links. An assessment and treatment plan is incorporated into the discharge instructions and sent to the primary care physician.A total of 9035 patients at ALGH were included in the analysis (n = 2807 at baseline and n = 6007 at year 6). Adherence to pharmacological therapy and monitoring of lipid profile improved in all 5 of the inpatient populations. Statistically significant improvement was noted in all outcomes in the cardiovascular and stroke populations (P < 0.05). In populations with diabetes and heart failure, all but one showed a statistically significant improvement. In the peripheral vascular disease population, 2 of the 5 showed statistically significant improvement. Adherence to outcome criteria in all high-risk populations over the 6-year time frame resulted in a 119% change in guideline compliance.The REACH program successfully uses patient information systems to provide a quality improvement tool that promotes optimal patient management of high-risk vascular disease states.

Comparison of pitavastatin with simvastatin in primary hypercholesterolaemia or combined dyslipidaemia

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate equivalence of pitavastatin compared with simvastatin in the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or combined dyslipidaemia. Secondary objectives included achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NECP) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C goals, comparison of other lipid parameters, and assessment of safety and tolerability of the two statins.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective, randomised, active-controlled double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week therapy trial was conducted in 857 patients with either primary hypercholesterolaemia or combined dyslipidaemia. The trial was designed to demonstrate the equivalence (non-inferiority of presumed equipotent doses) of pitavastatin compared with simvastatin. Patients were randomised to one of four groups: pitavastatin 2 mg/day, pitavastatin 4 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day or simvastatin 40 mg/day. The main study limitation was restriction of the study population to those eligible for administration of simvastatin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT# NCT00309777.

RESULTS

Pitavastatin 2 mg showed significantly better reductions of LDL-C (p = 0.014), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (p = 0.021) and total cholesterol (TC) (p = 0.041) compared with simvastatin 20 mg and led to more patients achieving the EAS LDL-C treatment target. Reduction of LDL-C in the pitavastatin 2 mg group was 39% compared with 35% in the simvastatin 20 mg group. Pitavastatin 4 mg showed similar effects on all lipid parameters to simvastatin 40 mg. The reductions in LDL-C were 44% and 43%, respectively. The safety profiles of pitavastatin and simvastatin were similar at the two dose levels. Pitavastatin was considered superior to simvastatin in terms of percent reduction of LDL-C in the lower dose group comparison and proved to be equivalent to simvastatin in percent reduction of LDL-C in the higher-dose group.

CONCLUSION

As compared with simvastatin, an established first-line lipid-lowering agent, pitavastatin is an efficacious treatment choice in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or combined dyslipidaemia.

The economic burden of heart failure

Heart failure, a major cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly, is a serious public health problem. As the population ages and the prevalence of heart failure increases, expenditures related to the care of these patients will climb dramatically. As a result, the health care industry must develop strategies to contain this staggering economic burden. Strategies may include adopting approaches for preventing heart failure and implementing new treatment modalities with proven efficacy into large-scale clinical practice. Successful implementation of these strategies will require intensive physician and patient education and development of innovative approaches to fund support services.

Appropriateness of cholesterol management in primary care by sex and level of cardiovascular risk

A study was undertaken to ascertain the appropriateness of lipid screening and management per the Third Report of the Adult Treatment Panel National Cholesterol Education Program (ATP III) guideline in a sample of North Carolina primary care practices. Demographics, cholesterol values, and comorbid conditions were abstracted from the medical records from 60 community practices participating in a randomized practice-based trial (Guideline Adherence for Heart Health). Eligible patients were aged 21 to 84 years, seen during the baseline period of June 1, 2001, through May 31, 2003, and who were not taking lipid-lowering therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess whether age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, ATP III risk category, or pretreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) influenced treatment. Among 5031 eligible patients, 1711 (34.5%) received screening lipid profiles. Screening rates were higher with older age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. No large differences were seen by sex. Among patients screened (mean age, 51.6 years; 57.9% female), 76.6% were appropriately managed within 4 months. In adjusted analyses, older age was associated with less appropriate treatment (odds ratio [OR] per 5 years, 0.91; P=.01), and patients with LDL cholesterol or=190 mg/dL and those at high risk. Among 375 patients eligible for drug treatment, those with LDL levels between 131 and 159 mg/dL were much less likely to be treated (OR, 0.15; P<.001) compared with those with LDL >190 mg/dL, whereas risk category did not influence treatment. The challenge facing implementation of ATP III guidelines is much greater for intermediate- and high-risk patients than for low-risk patients.

Effect of an educational program (PEGASE) on cardiovascular risk in hypercholesterolaemic patients

BACKGROUND

Many studies have demonstrated a gap between guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and their implementation in clinical practice.

AIM

The PEGASE education program has been devised with an aim to improve the management of patients at high risk of CVD.

METHODS

In a multicentre study carried out from 2001-2004 in France, 96 participating physicians were randomized into a "trained" group, which included 398 "educated" patients, and a "non-trained" group, which included 242 "non-educated" patients. Educated patients received six hospital-based educational sessions, four collective and two individual. Framingham score, smoking, lipid levels, glycaemia, blood pressure, dietary intake and drug compliance, as well as quality of life, were evaluated at baseline (M0) and 6 months (M6). The primary endpoint of the study was the efficacy of the PEGASE program in reducing global CVD risk in high-risk patients.

RESULTS

The Framingham score was calculated for 473 patients. The Framingham score improved significantly at M6 vs M0 in the educated group (13.0 +/- 8.21 vs 13.6 +/- 8.48, d = -0.658, p = 0.016), but not in the non-educated group (12.5 +/- 8.19 vs 12.4 +/- 7.81, d = +0.064, p = 0.836); the mean change between the two groups did not reach significance. Quality of life, LDL-c level and diet scores improved in the "educated" group only.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEGASE education program improved risk factors for CVD, although global assessment by Framingham score was not significantly different between groups. This program, aimed at meeting needs and expectations of patients and physicians, was easily implemented in all hospital centres.

National improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management of individuals at high coronary risk: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002

BACKGROUND

This study sought to evaluate national levels of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) before and after publication of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III). The ATP III guidelines intensified LDL-C targets and defined additional high-risk conditions. These recommendations are expected to have a noticeable impact on US cholesterol levels.

METHODS

Coronary heart disease (CHD) risk was determined per ATP III guidelines for US residents aged 20 to 79 years in the 1999 to 2000 and 2001 to 2002 surveys. For those at high risk, the LDL-C mean percentage <100 mg/dL and percentage > or =130 mg/dL, although not taking lipid-lowering therapy, were compared between the 2 surveys. In addition, subsets with and without CHD were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of all high-risk US residents, the mean LDL-C dropped from 129 mg/dL in 1999 to 2000 to 120 mg/dL in 2001 to 2002 (P = .003). Those <100 mg/dL increased from 23% to 32% (P = .003). Those > or =130 mg/dL and not on medication dropped from 36% to 27% (P = .001). Goal achievement and improvements were more favorable in the subset with CHD compared with those at high risk due to high-risk equivalent conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The sharp increase in high-risk US residents at the goal and the drop in the untreated percentage of those above treatment threshold illustrate national improvements in the management of LDL-C for those at high coronary risk. High-risk subjects without CHD displayed less significant improvements, suggesting an opportunity for better recognition and management of these individuals.

Myocardial heat shock protein changes in the failing heart following coronary artery ligation

BACKGROUND

Production of several heat shock proteins (Hsp) is enhanced after exposure to stress. There is little information concerning changes in myocardial Hsp under pathophysiological conditions. The aim of this study was to determine alterations in Hsp content in the viable left ventricular myocardium during the development of heart failure following coronary artery ligation (CAL).

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was produced by CAL of Wistar rats. One and eight weeks after the operation, haemodynamic parameters of rats with CAL were determined and then expression of Hsp27, Hsp60 and Hsp72 was measured by western blotting.

RESULTS

Animals showed a decrease in cardiac output and an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, symptoms of chronic heart failure (CHF), 8 weeks after CAL. Myocardial Hsp27 and Hsp72 at 1 week after CAL significantly increased, whereas expression of both proteins at 8 weeks was similar to that in rats which underwent a sham operation (without coronary artery ligation). In contrast, Hsp60 at 8 weeks, but not at 1 week, significantly increased in the sham rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Diverse changes in myocardial Hsp occurred during the development of CHF.

Cholesterol goal attainment in patients with coronary heart disease and elevated coronary risk: results of the Hong Kong hospital audit study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine 1) long-term lipid-lowering treatment patterns; 2) cholesterol goal attainment rates and possible determinants of goal achievement; and 3) effects of cholesterol goal attainment on coronary events in hospitalized Hong Kong patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort analysis, records of two public Hong Kong hospitals were reviewed for 196 adults (69% with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD-risk equivalent) who received at least one lipid-lowering therapy during hospitalization. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets were <2.6 mmol/l (<100 mg/dL) for patients with CHD or CHD risk equivalents and <3.37 mmol/l (<130 mg/dL) for those without.

RESULTS

Most participants were initiated on regimens of low to midequipotency doses and never had their regimens adjusted to higher potency. Approximately 44% of patients not at LDL-C at baseline failed to achieve goal during a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Patients with higher coronary risk and/or LDL-C levels at baseline were less likely than their lower-risk counterparts to achieve goal; for each 1-mmol/l (38.7-mg/dL) increase in LDL-C at baseline, the likelihood of attaining goal declined by 64%. Patients achieving cholesterol goal had significantly longer cardiovascular event-free times.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 44% of Hong Kong patients not at LDL-C goals at baseline did not achieve them over 1.9 years. More effective and well-tolerated therapies, including adjunctive regimens (e.g., ezetimibe-statin, niacin-statin), may be necessary to enhance LDL-C goal achievement and increase event-free time.

Reinforcing a continuum of care: in-hospital initiation of long-term secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome are particularly susceptible to further vascular or ischemic events. Effective secondary prevention following acute coronary syndrome requires multiple medications targeting the different mechanisms of atherothrombosis. The 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the management of unstable angina and non ST-segment myocardial infarction and the 2004 guidelines for ST-segment myocardial infarction assign priority to the long-term administration of four critical classes of drugs: antiplatelet agents, in particular aspirin and clopidogrel, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clinical trial evidence demonstrating their ability to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, available preventive pharmacotherapies remain underutilized. Suboptimal compliance with current recommendations, as with other management guidelines, arises from a host of entrenched physician, patient, and system-related factors. Optimal management of acute coronary syndrome acknowledges a continuum of care in which acute stabilization represents a single important component. Early, in-hospital implementation of secondary preventive measures reinforces the continuum of care approach, promoting a successful transition from treatment to prevention, inpatient to outpatient management, and, when appropriate, subspecialist to generalist care.

Lipid management in ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVES

In-hospital initiation and maintaining of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after discharge is recommended for dyslipidemic stroke patients. However, little is known about actual adherence to treatment in Taiwan. This study aims to describe the current practice of lipid testing and LLT and to identify predictors for patient to receive LLT.

METHODS

Between February 2001 and December 2002, a total of 1105 consecutive ischemic stroke patients were prospectively registered. Dyslipidemic ischemic stroke patients were recruited and followed over a 6 months period.

RESULTS

In-hospital lipid testing was performed in 91% of all patients and LLT was initiated in 74% (350/476) of dyslipidemic patients. During the 6 months follow-up period, lipid testing was performed in 77% (266/345) and LLT was maintained in 45% (154/345) of patients. However, the target LDL cholesterol level (<100mg/dL) was achieved in only 30% (78/255) of patients. Older patients had a lower chance to receive LLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-hospital initiation of LLT and lipid testing was considered adequate as compared to other studies. However, after discharge from the hospital, many patients, especially older patients remained untreated. Efforts to close treatment gaps in lipid management require sustained quality improvement efforts. More awareness in this area is needed.

Lipid-modifying therapy and attainment of cholesterol goals in Hungary: the return on expenditure achieved for lipid therapy (REALITY) study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in Eastern Europe. Few studies on cholesterol goal achievement have been conducted in Hungarian clinical settings. This study set out to evaluate lipid-modifying therapy practices and their effects on total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment in Hungarian patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD risk equivalents, or >or=2 coronary risk factors.

METHODS

This multicentre observational study involved patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy who were under the care of general practitioners (n = 300) or specialists (n = 140). Physician questionnaires were used to collect data on baseline patient characteristics, including laboratory parameters. Using validated cardiovascular risk assessment measures, patients were stratified into high-risk (10-year absolute coronary risk >20%; n = 367) and lower risk groups (n = 73). Cholesterol goals were TC <4.5 mmol/L (<175 mg/dL) and LDL-C <2.5 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) for the high-risk group and TC <5.0 mmol/L (<193 mg/dL) and LDL-C <3.0 mmol/L (<117 mg/dL) for those at lower risk.

RESULTS

Among 440 patients (n = 312 with CHD or CHD risk equivalents), 374 (85%) were initiated on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statin monotherapy), 44 (10%) received fibric acid derivatives and 22 (5%) received combination regimens. Although >50% of patients needed >35% TC lowering to reach goal, <10% of patients received high or very high potency lipid-modifying regimens or combination regimens initially. A total of 116 (26.4%) patients achieved their TC goals after >/=1 year of treatment, including 27.9% of patients with CHD/risk equivalents and 22.7% of those with risk factors only. Sixty-six (15%) patients achieved goal on initial lipid-modifying regimens, while a further 50 (11.4%) achieved goal following treatment changes, including upward dosage adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 74% of Hungarian patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy in our study did not achieve cholesterol goals. The proportion of patients realising their TC goals was higher in those treated by specialists but still did not exceed one-third.

Patterns and predictors of statin use after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVES

The benefits of statin therapy for patients with coronary artery disease have been well documented, including those occurring after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The purposes of this study were to assess statin prescription rates in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery and to identify the determinants of postoperative statin administration.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 9284 Medicare patients aged 65 years or older who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1995-2004) was assembled by using linked hospital and pharmacy claims data. Rates of statin use after hospital discharge were calculated, and predictors of postoperative statin use were identified by using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Overall, 35.9% of patients received statins within 90 days of coronary artery bypass graft surgery discharge. Use of statins within 90 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery steadily improved during the study period, from 13.1% in 1995 to 60.9% in 2004. Patient factors independently associated with an increase in postoperative statin therapy included preoperative statin use (odds ratio, 7.69), later year of operation (odds ratio, 1.22 per additional year), and additional postoperative medications (odds ratio, 1.16 per additional medication). Factors independently associated with a decrease in postoperative statin therapy included peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio, 0.60), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 0.67), stroke (odds ratio, 0.77), and older age (odds ratio, 0.96 per additional year). Surgeon and hospital characteristics were not independently associated with postoperative statin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins are considerably underused after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, although recent prescription rates are increasing. Patterns of use do not appear to correlate with coronary artery disease risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted quality improvement initiatives to increase the rate of statin administration to this at-risk population.