Transesophageal echocardiographic evidence of more pronounced left atrial stunning after chemical (propafenone) rather than electrical attempts at cardioversion from atrial fibrillation

Absence of left atrial stunning after cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients at low-stroke risk

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence and degree of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrium and of left atrial appendage (LAA) contractility before and after cardioversion (CV) in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Our study included 56 patients divided into two groups: group 1, comprising 32 clinically stable patients who were admitted to the Emergency Department with less than or equal to 48 h duration AF, and who underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided CV; and the control group (group 2), comprising 24 patients admitted to the Cardiological Department for elective TEE-guided CV of greater than 48 h AF. All patients underwent repeat TEE within 1 h after successful CV.

RESULTS

Patients with recent-onset AF (group 1) showed no thrombogenic milieu at baseline without any evidence of atrial stunning after successful CV. SEC mean grade (0-3 grading) was 0.09±0.3 versus 0.12±0.4 after CV (P=0.98), and LAA flow velocity was 60.7±19.4 versus 56.7±20.5 cm/s after CV (P=0.07). Group 2 patients showed a significantly higher degree of SEC compared with those in group 1 (0.09±0.3 vs. 0.66±0.7, P=0.0093) and significantly lower LAA flow velocities (60.7±19.4 vs. 32.5±12.4, P<0.0001), with significant worsening after successful CV (SEC degree: 0.66±0.9 vs. 1.37±0.9, P=0.0093; LAA flow velocity: 32.5±12.4 vs. 20.4±12.7 cm/s, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The absence of thrombogenic milieu and of left atrial stunning after CV in patients with recent-onset AF favours early CV without anticoagulation, at least in patients with a low thromboembolic risk profile. These patients could be discharged earlier from urgent care.

Mechanical function of left atrium and pulmonary vein sleeves before and after their antrum isolation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary vein (PV) sleeves are established as the main substrate taking part in the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation. However, we have extremely few data concerning their physiological role in the heart contractility. The aim of the study was to estimate the mechanical function of the left atrium (LA) and PV sleeves before and early after their isolation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients with a mean age of 57.4±8.3 years who underwent PVs isolation due to AF were enrolled in the study. A day before the procedure a computed tomography (CT) of the LA and PVs and dopplerography of transmitral flow were performed. During the procedure the mechanical function of the LA and PV sleeves were estimated by transesophageal echocardiography and manometry in the left heart chambers.

RESULTS

During the invasive study the patterns of the heart chambers and PV sleeves pressure were identified. These patterns confirmed the active role of the PV sleeves in LA filling and active LA relaxation during left ventricular systole. After PV isolation an alteration of transmitral blood flow and increase of LA pressure were registered. However, diastolic dysfunction was ruled out by LV manometry, thereby testifying LA mechanical function disturbance. The change in PV hemodynamics also occurred as a result of the decrease in PV sleeves contractility, revealed by manometry and paired CT scans.

CONCLUSIONS

The PVs take an active part in left atrial filling by contraction of their sleeves. Antrum isolation of the PVs leads to the deterioration of their contractility and LA reservoir function.

Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation: update on anticoagulation and invasive management strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Its increasing prevalence, particularly among the elderly, renders it one of the most serious current medical epidemics. Several management questions confront the clinician treating a patient with AF: Should the condition be treated? Is the patient at risk of death or serious morbidity as a result of this diagnosis? If treatment is necessary, is rate control or rhythm control superior? Which patients need anticoagulation therapy, and for how long? This review of articles obtained by a search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases presents the available evidence that can guide the clinician in answering these questions. After discussing the merits of available therapy, including medications aimed at controlling rate, rhythm, or both, we focus on the present status of ablative therapy for AF. Catheter ablation, particularly targeting the pulmonary veins, is being increasingly performed, although the precise indications for this approach and its effectiveness and safety are being actively investigated. We briefly discuss other invasive options that are less frequently used, such as pacemakers, defibrillators, left atrial appendage closure devices, and the surgical maze procedure.

Mitral annular velocity by Doppler tissue imaging for the evaluation of atrial stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Atrial and/or appendage stunning (AS) usually occur after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). Several parameters except mitral annular velocity were previously evaluated to determine AS. We investigated whether mitral annular velocity was useful for determining of AS.

METHODS

This study consisted of 52 consecutive patients with AF <3 months who converted to the sinus rhythm. Mitral inflow and annular velocities were measured before and after cardioversion. Left atrial appendage (LAA) size and flow were assessed. The average velocity of septal and lateral segments of mitral annulus was considered as the final annular velocity. Thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of 52 patients, 29 (56%) had AS but 23 did not. There was no significant difference in age, gender, and cardioversion type between two groups. Hypertension was more prevalent in patients without AS compared to those with AS (P = 0.02). Mitral annular systolic and E-wave velocities were comparable in both groups (P > 0.05). Mitral annular A-wave velocity (3.1 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.2 cm/s, P < 0.001), and its velocity-time integral (0.27 +/- 0.22 vs. 0.74 +/- 0.19 cm, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with AS compared with those without AS. The annular A-wave velocity < or =3.3 cm/s predicted AS with a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 76%. It was correlated with mitral inflow A velocity (r = 0.85, P < 0.001), LAA emptying velocity (r = 0.41, P = 0.003) and presence of SEC (r = -0.52, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After cardioversion of AF, mitral annular A-wave velocity may be a new marker to determine AS.

Severe stunned myocardium after lightning strike

OBJECTIVE

To report the development of myocardial stunning and severe heart failure after lightning strike with total recovery of function.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Coronary care unit at Medica Sur Clinic, Mexico.

PATIENT

A 42-yr-old woman who was hit by lightning developed rapid and progressive hemodynamic deterioration manifested by cardiogenic shock that required invasive monitoring. Twenty-four hours after the strike, intravenous levosimendan and intra-aortic balloon pump were initiated because the patient demonstrated no significant response to management with conventional inotropic agents. Two days later, echocardiographic signs of systolic and diastolic dysfunction improved markedly. Dual-isotope-imaging myocardial perfusion testing with technetium-99m-sestamibi and thallium-201, performed 9 days after admission, showed normal perfusion and normal left ventricular systolic function. The patient exhibited complete recovery of function. The exact mechanism of abnormal contractility in the absence of direct electrofulguration is unknown but may be explained by release of oxygen free radicals, proteolysis of the contractile apparatus, and cytosolic overload of intracellular calcium, followed by reduced myofilament sensitivity to calcium. These abnormalities are consistent with stunned myocardium.

CONCLUSIONS

Lightning strike may cause serious contractile dysfunction in the absence of irreversible myocardial injury, but the exact mechanism of this phenomenon remains unknown. We propose that lighting strike can cause myocardial stunning resulting in severe but reversible left ventricular dysfunction. The patient's recovery was facilitated by support treatment including administration of levosimendan, which increases the intracellular sensitivity to calcium, a mechanism disturbed in patients with myocardial stunning.

Left atrial appendage flow velocity as a quantitative surrogate parameter for thromboembolic risk: determinants and relationship to spontaneous echocontrast and thrombus formation--a transesophageal echocardiographic study in 500 patients with cerebral ischemia

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis in the left atrial (LA) appendage (LAA) is an important cause in the formation of thrombi. Determination of the LAA flow velocity (LAAV) could be a quantitative parameter for estimating thromboembolic risk. The objective of this study was to: (1) determine the relationship between LAAV and qualitative parameters with elevated thromboembolic risk (thrombus/spontaneous echocontrast [SEC]); and (2) define factors that influence LAAV.

METHODS

In all, 500 patients with stroke were examined consecutively by transesophageal echocardiography. In addition to measurement of the LAAV, the atrial appendage was examined for the presence of thrombi or SEC.

RESULTS

LAAV differed significantly among patients with sinus rhythm (71 +/- 16 cm/s), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and in sinus rhythm during transesophageal echocardiography (46 +/- 13 cm/s), paroxysmal AF and AF during transesophageal echocardiography (32 +/- 12 cm/s), and chronic AF (27 +/- 9 cm/s, P < .001). Independent of the rhythm, the risk of thrombus/SEC increased significantly at an LAAV less than 55 cm/s. At an LAAV 55 cm/s or more there is only a minimal risk of thrombus/SEC (negative predictive value 100% and 99%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that LAAV is the strongest predictor for the occurrence of thrombus/SEC (P < .0001). Further multivariate analysis showed that left ventricular ejection fraction, LA size, (paroxysmal) AF, age, and sex are independent parameters influencing LAAV.

CONCLUSION

Independent of the basic rhythm, there is a close relationship between LAAV and qualitative parameters of elevated thromboembolic risk. LAAV could, therefore, be a quantitative surrogate parameter for risk stratification. It is influenced by both cardiac and extracardiac factors.

Reversible myocardial dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial stunning frequently has been described in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. Recently, it has also been described in critically ill patients without ischaemic heart disease. It is possible that the most severe form of any syndrome, leading to cardio-respiratory arrest, may cause myocardial stunning. Myocardial stunning appears to have been demonstrated in experimental studies, though this phenomenon has not been sufficiently studied in human models. The aim of the present work has been to study and describe the possible development of myocardial dysfunction in patients resuscitated after cardio-respiratory arrest, in the absence of acute or previous coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of a case series.

SETTING

The intensive care unit (ICU) of a provincial hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

The study period was from April 1999 to June 2001. All patients admitted to the ICU with critical, non-coronary artery pathology, with no past history of cardiac disease, and those who were resuscitated after cardio-respiratory arrest, were included in the study.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and disturbances of segmental contractility. This study was carried out within the first 24h after admission, during the first week, during the second or third week, after 1 month, and between 3 and 6 months. Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 65 years (range 24--76) were included in the study. Twelve patients died. Twenty patients developed myocardial dysfunction; the initial LVEF in these patients was 0.28 (0.12--0.51), showing improvement over time in the patients who survived. All of these patients presented disturbances of segmental contractility which also became normal over time.

CONCLUSIONS

After successful CPR, reversible myocardial dysfunction, consisting of systolic myocardial dysfunction and disturbances of segmental contractility, may occur.

Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the acute effects of atrial pacing at different pacing sites on mechanical stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF).

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

20 patients with persistent AF were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAEV), and left atrial appendage emptying fraction (LAAEF) were assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) during AF, after conversion to sinus rhythm, and during atrial pacing from the right atrial appendage, left lateral atrium, and both atria simultaneously. Transmitral inflow velocity of the atrial wave (TMIF-A) by TOE and the maximum P wave duration in 12 lead ECG were also measured during sinus rhythm and atrial pacing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of atrial mechanical function and P wave duration in 12 lead ECG during atrial pacing from different sites after cardioversion of AF.

RESULTS

Compared with sinus rhythm, atrial pacing at 80 beats/min increased LAAEV from mean (SD) 14.6 (10.1) to 33.4 (19.8) cm/s (p = 0.001), LAAEF from 13.8 (8.5) to 32.1 (11.2)% (p < 0.001), and TMIF-A from 24.6 (11.9) to 45.6 (21.0) cm/s (p < 0.001) and reduced SEC grade from 2.6 (1.0) to 1.6 (0.9) (p < 0.001). These effects had a positive force-frequency relation. Biatrial pacing produced the shortest P wave duration and resulted in the most significant improvement in atrial function (LAAEV, 33.2 (19.3) v 53.7 (23.9) cm/s, p = 0.0001; LAAEF, 31.9 (11.1) v 46.2 (12.6)%, p < 0.0001; TMIF-A, 37.7 (18.3) v 54.1 (21.2) cm/s, p < 0.001; SEC grade, 1.4 (1.1) v 0.8 (0.9), p = 0.001, right atrial appendage versus biatrial pacing).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial pacing at increased rates can improve atrial mechanical function after cardioversion of persistent AF. Biatrial pacing may be the most effective technique to reverse atrial mechanical stunning.

Electrical cardioversion of emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Electrical cardioversion of emergency department (ED) patients with atrial fibrillation has not been well investigated. The objective of this study is to identify the outcomes and complications associated with ED electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This retrospective health records survey investigated a consecutive cohort of ED patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent electrical cardioversion in 4 EDs during a 42-month period. Trained personnel reviewed medical records for demographic characteristics, clinical descriptors, medical interventions, complications, and ED return visits within 7 days. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 388 patients (mean age 61 years; range 20 to 93 years). Duration of atrial fibrillation was less than 48 hours in 99% of the cohort. Electrical cardioversion was successful in 332 (86%) patients. Twenty-eight complications were noted in 25 electrical cardioversion encounters: 22 attributed to procedural sedation and analgesia and 6 attributed to electrical cardioversion. Three hundred thirty-three (86%) patients were discharged to home from the ED: 301 after electrical cardioversion success and 32 with electrical cardioversion failure. Thirty-nine patients (10%) returned to the ED within 7 days, 25 of these patients (6% of successful electrical cardioversion patients) returned because of relapse of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter cohort, selected ED patients with atrial fibrillation had high rates of electrical cardioversion success, infrequent hospital admission, and few immediate and short-term complications.

Atrial stunning: basics and clinical considerations

Conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm results in a transient mechanical dysfunction of atrium and atrial appendage, termed atrial stunning. Atrial stunning has been reported with all modes of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm including both transthoracic and low energy internal electrical, pharmacological, and spontaneous cardioversion, and conversion by overdrive pacing and by radiofrequency ablation. Atrial stunning is a function of the underlying arrhythmia becoming apparent at the restoration of sinus rhythm, not the function of the mode of conversion, and does not develop after the unsuccessful attempts of cardioversion or the delivery of electric current to the heart during rhythms other than atrial fibrillation or flutter. Tachycardia-induced atrial cardiomyopathy, cytosolic calcium accumulation, and atrial hibernation are the suggested mechanisms of atrial stunning. Atrial stunning is at maximum immediately after cardioversion and improves progressively with a complete resolution within a few minutes to 4-6 weeks depending on the duration of the preceding atrial fibrillation, atrial size, and structural heart disease. Atrial stunning causes postcardioversion thromboembolism despite restoration of sinus rhythm. Duration of anticoagulation therapy after successful cardioversion should depend on the duration of atrial stunning. Lack of improvement in cardiac output and functional recovery of patients immediately after cardioversion is attributed to the atrial stunning. Verapamil, acetylstrophenathidine, isoproterenol, and dofetilide have been reported to protect from atrial stunning in animal and small human studies. Right atrium stunning is less marked and improves earlier than that of left atrium, resulting in a differential atrial stunning explaining the rare occurrence of pulmonary edema after cardioversion.

Hibernation, Stunning, and Preconditioning: Historical Perspective, Current Concepts, Clinical Applications, and Future Implications

Despite considerable advances, coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. The development of effective therapeutic strategies for protecting the myocardium from ischemia would have major impact on patients with coronary artery disease. It is now accepted that patients with coronary artery disease can experience prolonged regional ischemic dysfunction that does not necessarily arise from irreversible tissue damage, and to some extent, can be reversed by restoration of blood flow. The initial stages of dysfunction are probably caused by chronic stunning that can be reversed after revascularization, resulting in rapid and complete functional recovery. On the other hand, the more advanced stages of dysfunction likely correspond to chronic hibernation. After revascularization, functional recovery will probably be quite delayed and mostly incomplete. Over the past decade, the possibility that an innate mechanism of myocardial protection might be inducible in the human heart has generated considerable excitement. In the last two decades, there was phenomenal growth in the understanding of the mechanism known as ischemic preconditioning that is responsible for the innate myocardial protection. Continued research and progress in this area may soon lead to the availability of preconditioning-mimetic treatments. The current concepts, mechanisms, and potential clinical applications of myocardial hibernation, stunning, and ischemic preconditioning are reviewed.

Acute reductions in ventricular myocardial tissue velocities after direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Cardioversion by direct current (DC) and other methods can cause atrial "stunning." There are case reports of acute pulmonary edema after DC cardioversion, but whether acute ventricular dysfunction is a general consequence of DC cardioversion is unknown. We have investigated whether DC cardioversion acutely affects myocardial velocity assessed by Doppler tissue imaging.

METHODS

40 patients (30 with atrial fibrillation and 10 with atrial flutter) undergoing elective DC cardioversion underwent transthoracic echocardiography with Doppler tissue imaging before and immediately after cardioversion, and after follow-up. Peak systolic velocity was derived for 6 ventricular segments using Doppler tissue imaging.

RESULTS

Immediately after DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, peak systolic velocity decreased in basal lateral (4.3 +/- 2.0-3.3 +/- 1.7 cm/s, P <.001), mitral annulus-septal (3.8 +/- 1.0-3.5 +/- 0.9, P <.05), mitral annulus-lateral (4.9 +/- 1.6-4.1 +/- 1.7, P <.001), and tricuspid annular (7.8 +/- 2.0-7.0 +/- 1.2, P <.03) segments, even though left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged. In contrast, for the atrial flutter group there were no significant changes in peak systolic velocity in any segment post-DC cardioversion. Follow up studies were performed after sustained in sinus rhythm in both atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter groups. For both groups, increased peak systolic velocity was found in all 6 segments on follow-up (all P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DC cardioversion causes subclinical, acute reversible reduction in left ventricular peak systolic velocity in patients with atrial fibrillation. The causes of this reduction in myocardial contractile velocity and the circumstances in which acute dysfunction become clinically significant warrant further investigation.

Atrial stunning: determinants and cellular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Atrial stunning is a transient depression of atrial and atrial-appendage mechanical function after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation compared with its precardioversion state.

METHOD

Atrial stunning associated with different methods of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and the determinants and cellular mechanisms of atrial stunning were elaborated by thoroughly examining the studies on the subject identified through a comprehensive literature search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Atrial stunning has been reported with all methods of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, including transthoracic electrical, low-energy internal electrical, pharmacological, and spontaneous. It is a function of the underlying atrial fibrillation becoming apparent at the restoration of sinus rhythm, regardless of the method used for conversion. Unsuccessful cardioversion does not result in atrial stunning. The duration of the preceding atrial fibrillation, atrial size, and underlying structural heart disease are the determinants of atrial stunning. A shorter duration of atrial fibrillation and smaller atrial diameters are associated with a relatively less severe stunning, lasting for a shorter duration. Atrial stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of <1 week usually resolves within 24 hours, and atrial stunning after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation usually resolves within 4 weeks. Tachycardia-induced atrial cardiomyopathy, atrial cytosolic calcium alterations with down-regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channels and up-regulation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, atrial hibernation with myocyte dedifferentiation and myolysis, and atrial fibrosis are the suggested mechanisms underlying atrial stunning. Atrial stunning determines the risk of postcardioversion thrombus formation in atria and atrial appendages, the duration of postcardioversion anticoagulation therapy, the recovery of the atrial contribution to the ventricular function, and the functional recovery of the patients after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Critical appraisal of transesophageal echocardiography in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and an important health concern in the United States because of the increasing aging population. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm to relieve symptoms and to reduce the incidence of thromboembolism is now common practice. Recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-facilitated cardioversion emerged as an acceptable therapeutic alternative owing to the assumption that early cardioversion can obviate many of the concerns and disadvantages associated with the conventional approach. We review the current standing of TEE-facilitated early cardioversion vis-à-vis the salient cardioversion issues and its potential future role amid evolving cardioversion paradigms.

Reversal of atrial mechanical stunning after cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias: implications for the mechanisms of tachycardia-mediated atrial cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Atrial mechanical stunning develops on termination of chronic atrial arrhythmias and is implicated in the genesis of thromboembolic complications after cardioversion. The mechanisms responsible for atrial mechanical stunning are unknown. The effects of atrial rate, isoproterenol, and calcium on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial stunning have not been evaluated, and it is not known if atrial stunning can be reversed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with chronic atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing radiofrequency ablation were studied. Fifteen patients in sinus rhythm undergoing ablation for paroxysmal AFL were studied as control for effects of the procedure. Left atrial appendage emptying velocities (LAAEVs) and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (LASEC) were assessed by transesophageal echocardiography during AFL, after reversion to sinus rhythm, during atrial pacing at cycle lengths of 750 to 250 ms, after a postpacing pause, and with isoproterenol or calcium. With termination of AFL, LAAEV decreased from 59.0+/-3.7 cm/s to 18.8+/-1.4 cm/s (P<0.0001) and LASEC grade increased from 0.9+/-0.1 to 2.2+/-0.2 (P<0.0001). Pacing increased LAAEV to a maximum of 38.4+/-3.2 cm/s (P<0.0001) and reduced LASEC grade to 1.9+/-0.2 (P=0.005). Isoproterenol and calcium reversed atrial mechanical stunning with LAAEV increasing to 89.3+/-12.6 cm/s (P=0.0007) and 50.2+/-10.5 cm/s (P=0.005), respectively, and LASEC grade decreasing to 0.2+/-0.1 (P=0.001) and 1.4+/-0.2 (P=0.01), respectively. The postpacing pause increased LAAEV to 69.3+/-3.7 cm/s (P<0.0001). No change in LAAEV was observed in the paroxysmal AFL group.

CONCLUSION

Atrial mechanical stunning can be reversed by pacing at increased rates and through the administration of isoproterenol or calcium. These findings suggest a functional contractile apparatus in the mechanically remodeled atrium as a result of chronic atrial flutter.

Transient atrial mechanical dysfunction (stunning) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter

BACKGROUND

Conversion of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and flutter (AFlt) to sinus rhythm results in a transient mechanical dysfunction of atria (atrial stunning). Methods used as a means of assessing atrial stunning, atrial stunning after conversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and the cause, mechanisms, determinants of the extent, and drugs affecting atrial stunning were examined.

METHODS

Studies on the subject, identified through a comprehensive literature search, were thoroughly evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial (LA) stunning has been reported with all modes of conversion of AFib/AFlt to sinus rhythm. The incidence of LA stunning is 38% to 80%. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, LA appendage (LAA) flow velocities and emptying fraction, transmitral inflow velocity of atrial wave (A-wave), time-velocity integral of A-wave, and atrial filling fraction have been used as means of assessing LA stunning. The data on right atrial (RA) stunning are limited, but parallel findings have been reported in the right atrium. Atrial stunning does not develop after the unsuccessful attempts of cardioversion or on delivery of electric current to the heart without AFib/AFlt, and it is a function of the underlying AFib/AFlt manifesting at the restoration of sinus rhythm. Tachycardia-induced atrial myopathy and chronic atrial hibernation are suggested mechanisms. Duration of preceding AFib/AFlt, atrial size, and underlying heart disease are determinants of the extent of atrial stunning. Verapamil, dofetilide, and acetylstrophenathidine have been shown to attenuate or protect from atrial stunning in animal or small human studies. A comprehensive knowledge of atrial stunning would be helpful in selecting the patients for, and the duration of, anticoagulation therapy after cardioversion.

Reversible myocardial dysfunction in critically ill, noncardiac patients: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review reversible myocardial dysfunction affecting critically ill patients without cardiac pathology.

DATA SOURCES

The bibliography for the study was compiled through a search of different databases for the period 1966-2001. References cited in the selected articles also were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

The selection criteria included all articles published on reversible myocardial dysfunction in critically ill patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Reversible myocardial dysfunction may develop in a situation of critical pathology, but the etiology of reversible myocardial dysfunction is not fully understood. This dysfunction may be accompanied by increases in enzyme concentrations and electrocardiographic changes. Reversible myocardial dysfunction probably is underdiagnosed, although its presence is associated with a worsening of the prognosis and with more specific therapeutic options. Further studies are necessary to define its true incidence and clinical implications.

Evidence for stunned myocardium in humans: a 2001 update

This article describes clinical situations in which stunning occurs and updates previous reviews on the topic. Stunning following angioplasty, angina and exercise-induced ischemia, infarction, and after cardiac surgery are described. In addition, newer concepts regarding stunning, including neurogenic stunned myocardium, are discussed. Left atrial stunning following cardioversion is a recently recognized phenomenon with important clinical implications, but differs from the original concept of post-ischemic stunning.

Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy

Management strategies for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) include: (1) the use of intravenous drugs for rate control, (2) drug termination, or (3) direct current (DC) cardioversion. Delays in cardioversion can promote atrial remodeling and add thromboembolic risk. Rate control awaiting spontaneous or pharmacologic conversion may be a cost-effective strategy in patients presenting with recent onset of symptoms. Early DC cardioversion can be cost-effective and minimize antiembolic therapy issues in the acute setting. In patients presenting with AF of unknown or >48 hours' duration, rate control and therapeutic warfarin for 3-4 weeks followed by medical or DC cardioversion is standard practice. However, delays in conversion promote atrial remodeling that makes restoration of sinus rhythm more difficult and increases the likelihood of postcardioversion AF recurrence. Transesophageal echocardiography can identify patients at low risk for a cardioversion-related embolic event and allows cardioversion to be performed earlier, thereby minimizing atrial remodeling.