Role of pacing in the treatment of vasovagal syncope

Predicting Vasovagal Responses: A Model-Based and Machine Learning Approach

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) or neurogenically induced fainting has resulted in falls, fractures, and death. Methods to deal with VVS are to use implanted pacemakers or beta blockers. These are often ineffective because the underlying changes in the cardiovascular system that lead to the syncope are incompletely understood and diagnosis of frequent occurrences of VVS is still based on history and a tilt test, in which subjects are passively tilted from a supine position to 20° from the spatial vertical (to a 70° position) on the tilt table and maintained in that orientation for 10–15 min. Recently, is has been shown that vasovagal responses (VVRs), which are characterized by transient drops in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and increased amplitude of low frequency oscillations in BP can be induced by sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) and were similar to the low frequency oscillations that presaged VVS in humans. This transient drop in BP and HR of 25 mmHg and 25 beats per minute (bpm), respectively, were considered to be a VVR. Similar thresholds have been used to identify VVR's in human studies as well. However, this arbitrary threshold of identifying a VVR does not give a clear understanding of the identifying features of a VVR nor what triggers a VVR. In this study, we utilized our model of VVR generation together with a machine learning approach to learn a separating hyperplane between normal and VVR patterns. This methodology is proposed as a technique for more broadly identifying the features that trigger a VVR. If a similar feature identification could be associated with VVRs in humans, it potentially could be utilized to identify onset of a VVS, i.e, fainting, in real time.

A Case of Cardiac Arrest for 31 Seconds During Recovery After Intravenous Sedation

A 26-year-old woman with a history of feeling nauseated during dental local anesthesia presented to our clinic for tooth extraction under intravenous sedation. Although she had experienced episodes of neurally-mediated syncope, her symptoms were controlled well with drug therapy, stopped 3 years earlier. No syncope episodes developed over the previous 2 years. Tooth extraction was performed under intravenous sedation without incident. When she was returned to a sitting position after being roused, convulsion, loss of consciousness, and cardiac arrest developed. One week later, similar symptoms occurred immediately after suture removal. We suspect that the change in body position triggered these episodes. It is important to avoid abrupt changes in body position and any other triggers and to administer preventive drugs in patients at high risk of syncope.

A Model of Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Vaso-Vagal Responses Produced by Vestibulo-Sympathetic Activation

Blood Pressure (BP), comprised of recurrent systoles and diastoles, is controlled by central mechanisms to maintain blood flow. Periodic behavior of BP was modeled to study how peak amplitudes and frequencies of the systoles are modulated by vestibular activation. The model was implemented as a relaxation oscillator, driven by a central signal related to Desired BP. Relaxation oscillations were maintained by a second order system comprising two integrators and a threshold element in the feedback loop. The output signal related to BP was generated as a nonlinear function of the derivative of the first state variable, which is a summation of an input related to Desired BP, feedback from the states, and an input from the vestibular system into one of the feedback loops. This nonlinear function was structured to best simulate the shapes of systoles and diastoles, the relationship between BP and Heart Rate (HR) as well as the amplitude modulations of BP and Pulse Pressure. Increases in threshold in one of the feedback loops produced lower frequencies of HR, but generated large pulse pressures to maintain orthostasis, without generating a VasoVagal Response (VVR). Pulse pressures were considerably smaller in the anesthetized rats than during the simulations, but simulated pulse pressures were lowered by including saturation in the feedback loop. Stochastic changes in threshold maintained the compensatory Baroreflex Sensitivity. Sudden decreases in Desired BP elicited non-compensatory VVRs with smaller pulse pressures, consistent with experimental data. The model suggests that the Vestibular Sympathetic Reflex (VSR) modulates BP and HR of an oscillating system by manipulating parameters of the baroreflex feedback and the signals that maintain the oscillations. It also shows that a VVR is generated when the vestibular input triggers a marked reduction in Desired BP.

Prospective evaluation of psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in recurrent vasovagal and unexplained syncope

Syncope is experienced by a third of the population, and in the absence of cardiac pathology is most commonly of vasovagal (VVS) or unexplained origin (US). Psychiatric morbidity has been observed in up to 81% of patients with US but findings with VVS are contradictory. Little is known regarding the chronicity of their psychiatric morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the psychological profile of patients with recurrent syncope prior to and following diagnostic head-up tilt testing (HUT), and whether it predicts syncope recurrence.

METHOD

Seventy-three women and 43 men (mean age=48+/-16.6) were recruited from all consenting patients referred for HUT. Psychological status (Psychiatric Symptom Index, Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), Fear of Blood Injury Subscale) and presence of mood/anxiety disorders (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders) were evaluated 1 month prior to and 6 months following HUT. Follow-up data were collected for 83 patients (mean age=48+/-17.34).

RESULTS

At baseline, clinically significant levels of distress were observed in 60% of patients. Those with US (negative HUT) had a fivefold greater risk of suffering from a depressive or anxiety disorder compared to VVS (positive HUT) after controlling for significant covariates. There was no significant change in distress level over follow-up, although psychiatric morbidity dropped from 33% to 22% (P=.049). Syncope recurrence was predicted by elevations in baseline psychological distress (OR=1.544, P=.013) independently of lifetime number of syncopes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients exhibited high levels of psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity despite reassurance and education received after HUT. Improved screening for and treatment of psychological distress in these patients is critical.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of orthostatic hypotension and vasovagal syncope

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) occurs in 0.5% of individuals and as many as 7-17% of patients in acute care settings. Moreover, OH may be more prevalent in the elderly due to the increased use of vasoactive medications and the concomitant decrease in physiologic function, such as baroreceptor sensitivity. OH may result in the genesis of a presyncopal state or result in syncope. OH is defined as a reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of at least 20 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of at least 10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of standing. A review of symptoms, and measurement of supine and standing BP with appropriate clinical tests should narrow the differential diagnosis and the cause of OH. The fall in BP seen in OH results from the inability of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) to achieve adequate venous return and appropriate vasoconstriction sufficient to maintain BP. An evaluation of patients with OH should consider hypovolemia, removal of offending medications, primary autonomic disorders, secondary autonomic disorders, and vasovagal syncope, the most common cause of syncope. Although further research is necessary to rectify the disease process responsible for OH, patients suffering from this disorder can effectively be treated with a combination of nonpharmacologic treatment, pharmacologic treatment, and patient education. Agents such as fludrocortisone, midodrine, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have shown promising results. Treatment for recurrent vasovagal syncope includes increased salt and water intake and various drug treatments, most of which are still under investigation.

Permanent cardiac pacing as primary therapy for neurocardiogenic (reflex) syncope

Recurrent reflex (or neurocardiogenic) syncope is a common clinical problem. Pacemaker therapy has been advocated as a potential therapy in severe or drug refractory cases of reflex syncope, while others have suggested that it may provide a benefit if employed as a primary therapeutic modality. The following paper reviews the concepts behind pacemaker therapy for reflex syncope and the results of various clinical trials that have evaluated its potential utility as a primary therapeutic modality.

Anaesthetic management of severe bradycardia during general anaesthesia using temporary cardiac pacing

There are few reports of management of severe bradycardia with temporary cardiac pacing. We describe a 65-yr-old female patient who developed bradycardia and hypotension on two occasions during general anaesthesia for laryngoscopy. The first episode was treated with atropine, ephedrine, and colloid infusion and the second with a temporary pacemaker and ephedrine.

Strategy for the management of vasovagal syncope

The disorders of autonomic control associated with orthostatic intolerance are a diverse group of syndromes that can result in syncope and near-syncope. A basic understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders is essential to diagnosis and proper treatment. It is especially important to recognise the difference between the effect of prolonged upright posture on a failing autonomic nervous system (a hyposensitive or dysautonomic response) and the vasovagal response (which may be a hypersensitive response). Vasovagal syncope is the most common abnormal response to upright posture and occurs in all age groups. The advent of tilt table testing has helped define a population with an objective finding during provocative testing that has enabled researchers to study the mechanism of vasovagal syncope and to evaluate the efficacy of treatments. In most patients, vasovagal syncope occurs infrequently and only under exceptional circumstances and treatment is not needed. Treatment may be indicated in patients with recurrent syncope or with syncope that has been associated with physical injury or potential occupational hazard. Based on study data, patients with vasovagal syncope can now be risk stratified into a high-risk group likely to have recurrent syncope and a low-risk group. Many patients with vasovagal syncope can be effectively treated with education, reassurance and a simple increase in dietary salt and fluid intake. In others, treatment involves removal or avoidance of agents that predispose to hypotension or dehydration. However, when these measures fail to prevent the recurrence of symptoms, pharmacological therapy is usually recommended. Although many pharmacological agents have been proposed and/or demonstrated to be effective based on nonrandomised clinical trials, there is a remarkable absence of data from large prospective clinical trials. Data from randomised placebo-controlled studies support the efficacy of beta-blockers, midodrine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and ACE inhibitors. There is also considerable clinical experience and a consensus suggesting that fludrocortisone is effective. Encouraging new data suggest that a programme involving tilt training can effectively prevent vasovagal syncope. For patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to these treatments, implantation of a permanent pacemaker with specialised sensing/pacing algorithms appears to be effective. A number of larger clinical trials are underway which should help further define the efficacy of a number of different treatments for vasovagal syncope.

Benefit of atrial pacing in sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND

Many patients with sleep apnea syndrome have nocturnal bradycardia, paroxysmal tachyarrhythmias, or both, which can be prevented by permanent atrial pacing. We evaluated the effect of using cardiac pacing to increase the heart rate during sleep in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.

METHODS

We studied 15 patients (11 men and 4 women; mean [+/-SD] age, 69+/-9 years) with central or obstructive sleep apnea who had received permanent atrial-synchronous ventricular pacemakers for symptomatic sinus bradycardia. All patients underwent three polysomnographic evaluations on consecutive nights, the first night for base-line evaluation and then, in random order, one night in spontaneous rhythm and one in dual-chamber pacing mode with atrial overdrive (basic rate, 15 beats per minute faster than the mean nocturnal sinus rate). The total duration and number of episodes of central or obstructive sleep apnea or hypopnea were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The mean 24-hour sinus rate during spontaneous rhythm was 57 +/- 5 beats per minute at base line, as compared with 72 +/- 3 beats per minute with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001). The total duration of sleep was 321 +/- 49 minutes in spontaneous rhythm, as compared with 331 +/- 46 minutes with atrial overdrive pacing (P=0.48). The hypopnea index (the total number of episodes of hypopnea divided by the number of hours of sleep) was reduced from 9 +/- 4 in spontaneous rhythm to 3 +/-3 with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001). For both apnea and hypopnea, the value for the index was 28 +/- 22 in spontaneous rhythm, as compared with 11 +/- 14 with atrial overdrive pacing (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sleep apnea syndrome, atrial overdrive pacing significantly reduces the number of episodes of central or obstructive sleep apnea without reducing the total sleep time.

Dysautonomia and neurocardiogenic syncope

Syncope in childhood is a common problem. In most children, syncope is benign, secondary to a disturbance in autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure. It is increasingly evident that neurally mediated syncope is a heterogeneous group of conditions, necessitating a reclassification of autonomic disorders. New entities, such as postural orthostatic tachycardia and cerebral vasoconstrictive syncope, are recognized. The key to the diagnosis of syncope is a careful history. Tilt testing can be useful when the history is unclear. Unfortunately tilt test protocols vary, affecting specificity and sensitivity. The mainstay of therapy is reassurance. If symptoms are troublesome, Fludrocortisone and B-blockers remain the favored drugs. The efficacy of Midodrine and Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors is currently under review. Cardiac pacing is effective for those patients with severe episodes and demonstrated asystole. It is not known whether pacing would be effective for the majority who have neurally mediated syncope without significant bradycardia.

Diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with syncope

This article focuses on the evaluation of patients with syncope, a symptom not a disease. Syncope is a transient loss of consciousness associated with loss of postural tone with spontaneous recovery. The authors discuss the utility of an indications for different diagnostic tests, the indications for hospital admission, and the management of patients with certain known causes of syncope, including vasovagal and arrhythmic.

Putting it together: a new treatment algorithm for vasovagal syncope and related disorders

The consensus process that culminated in this symposium established an algorithm to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope and related disorders. In some patients, the hemodynamic response to standing may identify an abnormality-postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or orthostatic hypotension-that can often be treated without further testing. When the response to standing is normal, tilt-table testing may be useful in making the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope and guiding treatment. In some patients, however, the diagnosis is clear from the history, and tilt-table testing may not be necessary. Not all patients with vasovagal syncope need to be treated, and many can be treated effectively with education, reassurance, and a simple increase in dietary salt. In evaluating the results of tilt-table testing, an important consideration is the distinction between vasovagal syncope and the dysautonomic response to tilt characterized by a gradual and progressive decrease in blood pressure that leads to syncope. Current practice patterns suggest that beta blockers, fludrocortisone, and midodrine, are commonly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope, and patients with the dysautonomic response are generally treated with fludrocortisone and midodrine. Permanent pacing with specialized pacing algorithms should be considered for patients with frequent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to medical therapy. The guidelines proposed here are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence; however, they do not suggest a standard of care for all patients.