General tolerability and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin Therapy for the Treatment of Acute and Recurrent Idiopathic Pericarditis

Aspirin (ASA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a mainstay of therapy for the treatment of idiopathic pericarditis (IP). A comprehensive review consisting of pertinent clinical literature, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic considerations, has not been released in recent years. This review will facilitate the clinician's understanding of pharmacotherapeutic considerations for using ASA/NSAIDs to treat IP. Data were compiled using clinical literature consisting of case reports, cohort data, retrospective and prospective studies, and manufacturer package inserts. ASA, ibuprofen, indometacin, and ketorolac relatively have the most evidence in the treatment of IP, provide symptomatic relief of IP, and should be tapered accordingly. ASA is the drug of choice in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), or renal disease, but should be avoided in patients with asthma and nasal polyps, who are naïve to ASA therapy. Ibuprofen is an inexpensive and relatively accessible option in patients who do not have concomitant CAD, HF, or renal disease. Indometacin is not available over-the-counter in the USA, and has a relatively higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) adverse effects. Ketorolac is an intravenous option; however, clinicians must be mindful of the maximum dose that can be administered. While ASA/NSAIDs do not ameliorate the disease process of IP, they are part of first-line therapy (along with colchicine), for preventing recurrence of IP. ASA/NSAID choice should be dictated by comorbid conditions, tolerability, and adverse effects. Additionally, the clinician should be mindful of considerations such as tapering, high-sensitivity CRP monitoring, bleeding risk, and contraindications to ASA/NSAID therapy.

Osteoarthritis of the hand II: chemistry, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of naproxen, and clinical outcome studies

Objective

This article aims to review osteoarthritis of the hand and the role of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) naproxen on its management. We discuss the chemical and pharmacological properties of naproxen and the NSAID class, with an emphasis on its mechanism and adverse reactions. In the context of part I of this paper in characterizing hand osteoarthritis (OA), we review clinical trials that have been conducted involving hand OA and naproxen.

Key findings

The therapeutic effect of NSAIDs stems from its role on inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 or COX-2 enzyme activity in the body. These enzymes play a major role in maintaining several functions in the body and due NSAIDs' inhibitory effects; many principle adverse reactions occur with the use of NSAIDs such as: gastrointestinal tract issues, cardiovascular risks, renal, hepatic, central nervous system and cutaneous. Review of clinical trials involving naproxen and hand OA show that it is significantly more efficacious when compared with placebo.

Summary

These studies, along with the finding that naproxen is of least cardiovascular risk in the NSAID class, may show that it can be part of one of the approaches in managing the condition. It is important to note that the optimal NSAID to use varies for each individual. The finding that the use of naproxen leads to the smallest increase in cardiovascular risk appeals to those at-risk individuals who suffer from OA and require pharmacological treatment for relief.

Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of NSAIDs: a case/noncase analysis of spontaneous reports from the French pharmacovigilance database 2002-2006

To evaluate the safety profile of eight oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) available in France, using data reported through the French pharmacovigilance system. Data (from 2002 to 2006) were analysed for aceclofenac, diclofenac, ketoprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, nimesulide, piroxicam and tenoxicam, focusing on the reported rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the following system organ classes: gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous, renal and cardiovascular. A total of 42 389 serious ADR reports were identified, and 38 506 were included in a case/noncase analysis. Ketoprofen was associated with the highest cumulative reported rate of serious ADRs (0.78 cases per million defined daily doses), followed by diclofenac (0.58), nimesulide (0.52), naproxen (0.50), piroxicam (0.47), tenoxicam (0.42), meloxicam (0.41) and aceclofenac (0.30). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal and rarely, cardiovascular events. In the case/noncase analysis, ketoprofen, piroxicam and naproxen were associated with the highest risk of serious gastrointestinal ADRs (odds ratios [ORs] of 6.87, 6.54 and 5.07, respectively). Nimesulide and aceclofenac were associated with the highest risk of liver ADRs (adjusted ORs of 4.53 and 3.67, respectively), as was meloxicam for cutaneous ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.15) and tenoxicam for renal ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.17). The most frequent serious ADRs reported with the selected oral NSAIDs are cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal events. The highest risks for serious gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous and renal adverse events were linked, respectively, with ketoprofen, nimesulide, meloxicam and tenoxicam compared with the other NSAIDs.

Does administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug determine morphological changes in adrenal cortex: ultrastructural studies

Rofecoxib (Vioxx© made by Merck Sharp & Dohme, the USA) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug which belongs to the group of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenasis-2, i.e., coxibs. Rofecoxib was first registered in the USA, in May 1999. Since then the drug was received by millions of patients. Drugs of this group were expected to exhibit increased therapeutic action. Additionally, there were expectations concerning possibilities of their application, at least as auxiliary drugs, in neoplastic therapy due to intensifying of apoptosis. In connection with the withdrawal of Vioxx© (rofecoxib) from pharmaceutical market, attempts were made to conduct electron-microscopic evaluation of cortical part of the adrenal gland in preparations obtained from animals under influence of the drug. Every morning animals from the experimental group (15 rats) received rofecoxib (suspension in physiological saline)--non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (Vioxx©, Merck Sharp and Dohme, the USA), through an intragastric tube in the dose of 1.25 mg during 8 weeks. In the evaluated material, there was found a greater number of secretory vacuoles and large, containing cholesterol and other lipids as well as generated glucocorticoids, lipid drops in cytoplasm containing prominent endoplasmic reticulum. There were also found cells with cytoplasm of smaller density--especially in apical and basal parts of cells. Mitochondria occasionally demonstrated features of delicate swelling. The observed changes, which occurred on cellular level with application of large doses of the drug, result from mobilization of adaptation mechanisms of the organism.

The time to onset and overall analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib 50 mg: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To determine the time to onset of analgesia of rofecoxib based on a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, postoperative oral surgery pain studies.

METHODS

A search on MEDLINE and of Merck data on file was conducted to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis inclusion criteria required that patients were treated with a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg when they experienced moderate or severe pain after surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars; study design involved patient randomization, double-blinding, and matching placebo, and onset data from individual patients were available. The meta-analysis of time to onset also required that studies used the two-stopwatch method. Eleven studies fulfilled the onset criteria and included patients who received a single dose of rofecoxib 50 mg (N = 1220) or placebo (N = 483). These studies were analyzed to determine time to onset of analgesia, time to perceptible pain relief, percentage of patients achieving onset of analgesia, and duration of analgesia. Six of the 11 studies included a nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (N = 303) and were included in the onset meta-analysis for comparison. The meta-analysis of overall efficacy also required that data on total pain relief scores over 8 hours were available. Over-all effectiveness of analgesia was based on analysis of 13 studies involving 1330 rofecoxib patients and 570 placebo patients on the endpoints of total pain relief scores over 8 hours and patient global assessment of response to therapy at 24 hours. Eight of the 13 studies with a nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug comparator (N = 391) were included for the efficacy meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in each study. Median time to onset of analgesia for rofecoxib was 34 minutes (95% CI, 31-38 minutes), significantly faster than placebo, which did not achieve onset within the 4 hours the assessment was conducted (P < 0.001). Duration of analgesia for rofecoxib 50 mg was > 24 hours. Rofecoxib achieved a greater mean total pain relief score over 8 hours than placebo (17.4 versus 4.4; P < 0.001) and a greater patient response rate on patient global assessment of response to therapy at 24 hours than placebo (73% versus 16%; P < 0.001). Outcomes were similar between the rofecoxib group and the nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug group.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of over 1200 rofecoxib-treated patients, a single dose of rofecoxib 50 mg demonstrated a rapid onset of analgesia in approximately half an hour combined with sustained effectiveness, supporting its use as a treatment of acute pain.

Effect of non-selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors on the PFA-100 closure time

The place of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the peri-operative period remains under discussion. Due to the absence of COX-2 in platelets, the risk of bleeding in patients who use selective NSAIDs is thought to be decreased. We studied the influence of aspirin, diclofenac, lornoxicam and rofecoxib on the in vitro bleeding time using the platelet function analyser (PFA-100). The PFA-100 simulates the process of platelet adhesion and aggregation after vascular injury in vitro. Measurements in 43 volunteers were performed at three time points: before, 3 h, and 12 h after oral ingestion of one of the randomly assigned study medications. Aspirin, diclofenac and lornoxicam had a significant effect on the in vitro closure time, while rofecoxib did not show this effect. This supports the use of COX-2 selective drugs in the peri-operative period to minimise the risk of bleeding.

Mucosal damage induced by preferential COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors: role of prostaglandins and inflammatory response

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are well known to induce gastric mucosal damage including bleeding, ulceration and perforation in humans and animals too. These effects are related with the inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase, which is the main established mechanism of action for these drugs. Fasted rats were given piroxicam, preferential COX-1 inhibitor (10-20 mg/kg) or meloxicam, preferential COX-2 inhibitor (7.5-15 mg/kg) orally. Six or nine hours (h) later, respectively, the stomach was excised, the severity of the damage assessed and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity measured, as well as prostaglandin PGE(2) content. Furthermore, in order to assess the effects of these oxicams over previously damaged gastric mucosa, 1 ml of 0.6 N HCl was administered p.o. followed, 1 h after, of the correspondent dose of each NSAID, and the same parameters were determined. Oral administration of both drugs dose-dependently caused acute gastric haemorrhage erosions. Myeloperoxidase activity was significantly increased by piroxicam administration. In addition, PGE(2) content was significantly reduced. The association between the administration of the acid and NSAID caused a worsening of the damage and, while myeloperoxidase activity did not modify by both piroxicam and meloxicam, PGE(2) levels were reduced. These results suggest that the PG derived from both COX-1 and COX-2 pathway plays a beneficial role in the gastroprotection, and thus caution should be exercise in the clinical use of preferential COX-2 inhibitors.

The mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bone healing: a concise review

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use continues to expand at a remarkable rate due both to the broad spectrum of clinical applications for these medications and to the relatively recent introduction of the popular COX-2-selective inhibitors. The use of NSAIDs is particularly prevalent in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions and injuries. Reports of impaired bone healing associated with NSAID use, therefore, are a particular cause for concern. Animal and in vitro studies have demonstrated impaired bone healing in the presence of traditional NSAIDs, as measured by a variety of different parameters. More recently, initial studies investigating the effects of COX-2-selective inhibitors on bone healing have yielded similar results. With mounting evidence that NSAIDs do in fact interfere with proper bone healing in various animal models, questions have arisen regarding the potential mechanism through which NSAIDs produce this outcome and whether these results can be translated to clinical settings. A likely pathway for these observed effects results from an understanding of the steps involved in bone healing itself. These steps include an inflammatory response, bone resorption, and new bone formation. Investigations over the past several decades have elucidated a role for prostaglandins (PGs) in each of these areas. Specifically, PGs have been shown to elicit and participate in inflammatory responses, increase osteoclast activity and subsequent bone resorption, and increase osteoblast activity and new bone formation. This apparent integral role for PGs in the process of bone healing, coupled with the knowledge that NSAIDs act by inhibiting the production of PGs, results in an understanding of the likely mechanism through which NSAIDs impart their deleterious effects on bone healing. By inhibiting the COX enzymes and the subsequent production of PGs, NSAIDs not only achieve their desired anti-inflammatory effects but also inhibit the increased production of PGs that is necessary for bone healing to occur. Despite this understanding of the potential mechanism through which NSAIDs inhibit bone healing in a laboratory setting, few studies exist that show whether these inhibitory effects are also evident clinically. Thus, further studies will need to decipher whether similar inhibitory effects occur in a clinical setting.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of pericarditis

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) represent the mainstay of treatment of acute pericarditis. We systematically reviewed efficacy and safety of NSAIDs, management of NSAID-induced side effects and potential superiority of specific agents in the treatment of pericarditis. We also reviewed the role of NSAIDs in specific pericardial disease entities that may represent therapeutic challenge.

Pharmacovigilance of over-the-counter products based in community pharmacy: methodological issues from pilot work conducted in Hampshire and Grampian, UK

PURPOSE

The incidence of serious adverse events from non-prescription medicines remains to be established. The aim of this initial pilot work, using an observational cohort design, was to determine the feasibility of conducting a pharmacovigilance study of a non-prescription medicine, based in community pharmacies.

METHOD

Community pharmacists from Grampian, Scotland, and Hampshire, England, recruited user-purchasers of ibuprofen. Exposure data were collected from a series of self-completed questionnaires. Outcome data were any new symptoms, use of concomitant medication and subsequent health-care utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 1021 eligible customers were recruited, 6.4% (466/7320) and 48.2% (555/1152) by the Hampshire and Grampian networks respectively. The cohorts differed with regard to age, smoking and socio-economic status, reason for purchase and recommendation, and duration of use. The two cohorts reported different use of concomitant medication (46.0 and 65.5%), asthma (7.2 and 10.5%), stomach/peptic ulcer (3.5 and 2.1%), a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms post-compared to pre-purchase (12.9 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.0006 and 8.8 vs. 5.8%, p = 0.034), ingestion of doses in excess of the licensed non-prescription dose by 5.1 and 3.9%, and discontinuation of treatment because the medicine upset them by 4.5 and 3.1%, respectively. Most participants did not seek medical advice for their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Greater vigilance is required for adverse events that may be attributable to non-prescription product use. Development of pharmacovigilance models using community pharmacies is one means of systematically collecting information regarding drug safety. Further work is needed to identify a method which maximizes patient recruitment whilst maintaining acceptable follow-up rates.

Cox-2 inhibitors and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of pain in the elderly

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed therapies for acute and chronic pain in the elderly. NSAIDs are effective in treating many disorders, but their use often is limited by toxicities, especially gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. COX-2 inhibitors are a major therapeutic advance, providing the analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of NSAIDs, with a significant improvement in gastrointestinal safety. These new agents may be ideal therapies for older patients at risk for NSAID-related gastrointestinal toxicity.

Rationalizing cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition for maximal efficacy and minimal adverse events

New information indicates that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is constitutively expressed in several tissues, including brain, lung, pancreas, kidney, and ovary, and plays an important role in renal and gastrointestinal function. Selective COX-2 inhibition has been associated in animal studies with impairment of ulcer healing and renal function and inhibition of prostacyclin, an effect that inhibits vasodilation without inhibiting platelet aggregation. The clinical consequences, if any, of these effects remain to be determined in long-term studies in humans. The premise that selective COX-2 inhibitors will cause less gastrointestinal toxicity than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs that inhibit both COX isoforms needs to take into account the low toxicity of nabumetone. The gastrointestinal safety profile of this nonacidic, dual COX inhibitor that does not undergo enterohepatic circulation has been evaluated in extensive clinical trials. The data submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in the New Drug Application for nabumetone (Relafen), the comparative trials subsequently completed, the published databases of the comparative gastrointestinal toxicity of various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the meta-analysis published in this issue of The American Journal of Medicine (Schoenfeld, page 48S) indicate that nabumetone has the lowest incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity among the extensively studied NSAIDs. Overall, the incidence is approximately 10-fold less than with comparator drugs. This rate is an appropriate current reference against which the gastrointestinal toxicity of COX-2 inhibitors can be compared.