Pancreas after kidney transplants

Heparin Thromboprophylaxis in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Thrombosis is a leading causes of pancreas graft loss after simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA). There remains no standardized thromboprophylaxis protocol. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of heparin thromboprophylaxis on the incidence of pancreas thrombosis, pancreas graft loss, bleeding, and secondary outcomes in SPK, PAK, and PTA. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched BIOSIS®, PubMed®, Cochrane Library®, EMBASE®, MEDLINE®, and Web of Science® on April 21, 2021. Primary peer-reviewed studies that met inclusion criteria were included. Two methods of quantitative synthesis were performed to account for comparative and non-comparative studies. We included 11 studies, comprising of 1,122 patients in the heparin group and 236 patients in the no-heparin group. When compared to the no-heparin control, prophylactic heparinization significantly decreased the risk of early pancreas thrombosis and pancreas loss for SPK, PAK and PTA without increasing the incidence of bleeding or acute return to the operating room. Heparin thromboprophylaxis yields an approximate two-fold reduction in both pancreas thrombosis and pancreas loss for SPK, PAK and PTA. We report the dosage, frequency, and duration of heparin administration to consolidate the available evidence.

Survival benefit of the homologous kidney allograft in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants and its potential protective role

The superior death-censored graft survival of the pancreas allograft in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants (SPK) over pancreas alone transplants (PTA) has long been recognized. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and a high-volume pancreas transplant program, we investigated the possible protective role of the kidney allograft in SPK transplants. We analyzed 19,043 primary pancreas transplants between 2000 and 2020, including 735 transplants performed at the University of Minnesota. SPK transplants demonstrated a superior death-censored graft survival over pancreas after kidney (PAK) and simultaneous pancreas and living donor kidney (SPLK) transplants, which both demonstrated better survival than PTA transplants. This effect was not affected by mode or duration of renal replacement therapy prior to transplant. Furthermore, we found that HLA match at the B-locus between the prior kidney and current pancreas allografts demonstrated a protective effect (HR 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.29-1.00), with a 2-antigen match demonstrating superior death-censored graft survival to a 1- or 0-antigen match. We propose that a homologous kidney allograft in SPK transplants affords protection to the pancreas allograft - likely through a combination of better surveillance for rejection and direct immunoprotection offered by the same-donor kidney. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The survival advantage of pancreas after kidney transplant

Patient survival after pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK) has been reported to be inferior to patient survival after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK). The authors examine national data to further explore allograft (kidney and pancreas) and patient survival after PAK. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 1995 to 2010. The analysis compared PAK and SPK candidates and recipients. Kaplan-Meier analysis results showed that PAK after either a living or a deceased donor kidney transplant is associated with increased kidney graft survival compared with recipients with type 1 diabetes who received only a kidney. The best kidney allograft survival was for patients who received a living donor kidney followed by PAK. Receiving a living donor kidney was associated with increased pancreas allograft survival compared with receiving a deceased donor kidney. PAK transplant recipients who receive both organs have a survival advantage compared with uremic candidates who receive neither (SPK waitlist). Compared with uremic diabetic waitlist patients, SPK and PAK recipients showed similar overall patient survival. Successful PAK offers a survival advantage compared with receiving neither a kidney nor a pancreas transplant. These data also suggest that receiving a pancreas (after kidney) transplant may have a protective effect on the kidney allograft.

Pancreas grafts for transplantation from donors with hypertension: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database

BACKGROUND

With the rising demands for pancreas transplantation, surgeons are trying to extend the donors pool and set up a more appropriate assessment system. We aim to evaluate the effect of donor hypertension on recipient overall and graft survival rates.

METHODS

Twenty-four thousand one hundred ninety-two pancreas transplantation patients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were subdivided into hypertension group (HTN, n = 1531) and non-hypertension group (non-HTN, n = 22,661) according to the hypertension status of donors. Recipient overall and graft survival were analyzed and compared by log rank test, and hazard ratios of predictors were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Patient overall and graft survival of non-HTN group were higher than that of the HTN group (both p < 0.001). The duration of hypertension negatively influenced both overall and graft survival rates (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that hypertension was an independent factor for reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.18; p < 0.001). Other independent factors included recipient body mass index (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p < 0.001) and transplant type (pancreas after kidney transplants / pancreas transplant alone vs. simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 134-1.55; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor hypertension is an independent factor for recipient survival after pancreas transplantation and could be considered in donor selection as well as post-transplant surveillance in clinical practice.

Pancreatic Transplantation: Evaluation and Management

More than 2 million people in the United States have type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pancreatic transplantation has emerged as the single most effective means of achieving normal glucose homeostasis in this patient population. Newer immunosuppressive agents and surgical techniques continue to evolve, resulting in improved long-term graft and patient survival. Herein, an understanding of the evaluation, technical aspects, and perioperative management of pancreas transplantation is outlined.

Three types of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to study and compare clinical and functional outcomes after simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK DD), simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplantation (SPK DL), and simultaneous living donor pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK LL).

METHODS

From January 1, 1996 to September 1, 2005, 8918 primary, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) procedures were reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Of these, 8764 (98.3%) were SPK DD, 115 (1.3%) were SPK DL, and 39 (0.4%) were SPK LL. We compared these 3 groups with regard to several endpoints including patient and pancreas and kidney graft survival rates.

RESULTS

The 1-year and 3-year patient survival rates for SPK DD were 95% and 90%, 97% and 95% for SPK DL, and 100% and 100% for SPK LL recipients, respectively (P ≥ .07). The 1-year and 3-year pancreas graft survival rates for SPK DD were 84% and 77%, 83% and 71% for SPK DL, and 90% and 84% for SPK LL recipients, respectively (P ≥ .16). The 1-year and 3-year kidney graft survival rates for SPK DD were 92% and 84%, 94% and 86% for SPK DL, and 100% and 89% for SPK LL recipients, respectively (P ≥ .37).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient survival rates and graft survival rates for pancreas and kidney were similar among the 3 groups evaluated in this study.

Health-related quality of life may improve after transplantation in pancreas-kidney recipients

Pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) may significantly improve quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with type 1 diabetes. We have assessed the changes felt by PKT patients, using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Patients were asked to compare how their HRQOL had changed from pre-transplantation to the last visit. The 60 men and 66 women enrolled had a mean follow-up of five yr; 84.1% with both grafts, 15.9% with one graft functioning. In all domains of EuroQol-5D scores improved after PKT, as well as the visual analogue scale health state (from 38% to 84%, p < 0.001; effect size 3.34). In GIQLI, physical function was felt better after PKT than before (14.83 ± 3.86 vs. 7.86 ± 4.43, p < 0.001; effect size 1.68); the same was observed for psychological status, social function, and GI complaints. Concerning the burden of medical treatment, the score significantly improved (from 1.31 to 3.63, p < 0.001, effect size 2.02). The rate of unemployed patients decreased after PKT (from 50.8% to 36.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that having only one functioning graft was associated with worse HRQOL scores (B = -5.157, p = 0.015). In conclusion, for all assessed domains, patients reported a significant improvement in HRQOL after PKT. Maintenance of the two grafts functioning predicted higher improvement of HRQOL scores.

Imaging in pancreatic transplants

Pancreatic transplantation, performed alone or in conjunction with kidney transplantation, is an effective treatment for advanced type I diabetes mellitus and select patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Following advancements in surgical technique, postoperative management, and immunosuppression, pancreatic transplantation has significantly improved the length and quality of life for patients suffering from pancreatic dysfunction. While computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have more limited utility, ultrasound is the preferred initial imaging modality to evaluate the transplanted pancreas; gray-scale assesses the parenchyma and fluid collections, while Doppler interrogation assesses vascular flow and viability. Ultrasound is also useful to guide percutaneous interventions for the transplanted pancreas. With knowledge of the surgical anatomy and common complications, the abdominal radiologist plays a central role in the perioperative and postoperative evaluation of the transplanted pancreas.

Treatment options for diabetes: potential role of stem cells

There are diseases and injuries in which a patient's cells or tissues are destroyed that can only be adequately corrected by tissue or organ transplants. Stem cells may be able to generate new tissue and even cure diseases for which there is no adequate therapy. Type 1 diabetes (T1DM), an insulin-dependent diabetes, is a chronic disease affecting genetically predisposed individuals, in which insulin-secreting beta (β)-cells within pancreatic islets of Langerhans are selectively and irreversibly destroyed by autoimmune assault. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is characterized by a gradual decrease in insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues and the liver (insulin resistance), followed by a gradual decline in β-cell function and insulin secretion. Successful replacing of damaged β-cells has shown considerable potential in treating T1DM, but lack of adequate donors is a barrier. The literature suggests that embryonic and adult stem cells are promising alternatives in long-term treatment of diabetes. However, any successful strategy should address both the need for β-cell replacement and controlling the autoimmune response to cells that express insulin. This review summarizes the current knowledge of options and the potential of stem cell transplantation in diabetes treatment.

Current status of pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage diabetes mellitus. Over the last four decades, many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, which contributed to increased number of indications and improved allograft survival. Pancreas transplantation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure with a relatively higher complication rate, and lifelong immunosuppression. Therefore, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy such as islet transplantation have been in progress. This article summarizes the current understanding of pancreas transplantation-associated indications, donor selection, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and rejection.

Evolution of β-Cell Replacement Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pancreas Transplantation

Diabetes mellitus remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 23.6 million people in the United States are affected. Of these individuals, 5-10% have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM), an autoimmune disease. Although it often appears in childhood, T1DM may manifest at any age. The effects of T1DM can be devastating, as the disease often leads to significant secondary complications, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Since the late 1960s, surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus has continued to evolve and has become a viable alternative to chronic insulin administration. In this review, the historical evolution, current status, graft efficacy, benefits, and complications of pancreas transplantation are explored.

Patient-reported outcomes following islet cell or pancreas transplantation (alone or after kidney) in Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review

AIMS

For selected individuals with complex Type 1 diabetes, pancreatic islet transplantation (IT) offers the potential of excellent glycaemic control without significant hypoglycaemia, balanced by the need for ongoing systemic immunosuppression. Increasingly, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered alongside biomedical outcomes as a measure of transplant success. PROs in IT have not previously been compared directly with the closest alternate treatment option, pancreas transplant alone (PTA) or pancreas after kidney (PAK).

METHODS

We used a Population, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes (PICO) strategy to search Scopus and screened 314 references for inclusion.

RESULTS

Twelve studies [including PRO assessment of PAK, PTA, islet-after kidney (IAK) and islet transplant alone (ITA); n = 7-205] used a total of nine specified and two unspecified PRO measures. Results were mixed but identified some benefits which remained apparent up to 36 months post-transplant, including improvements in fear of hypoglycaemia, as well as some aspects of diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL) and general health status. Negative outcomes included short-term pain associated with the procedure, immunosuppressant side effects and depressed mood associated with loss of graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

The mixed results may be attributable to limited sample sizes. Also, some PRO measures may lack sensitivity to detect actual changes, as they exclude issues and domains of life likely to be important for QoL post-transplantation and when patients may no longer perceive themselves to have diabetes. Thus, the full impact of islet/pancreas transplantation (alone or after kidney) on QoL is unknown. Furthermore, no studies have assessed patient satisfaction, which may highlight further advantages and disadvantages of transplantation.

Pancreas after living donor kidney transplants in diabetic patients: impact on long-term kidney graft function

In this single-institution study, we compared outcomes in diabetic recipients of living donor (LD) kidney transplants that did vs. did not undergo a subsequent pancreas transplant. Of 307 diabetic recipients who underwent LD kidney transplants from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2003, a total of 175 underwent a subsequent pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplant; 75 were deemed eligible (E) for, but did not receive (for personal or financial reasons), a PAK, and thus had a kidney transplant alone (KTA); and 57 deemed ineligible (I) for a PAK because of comorbidity also had just a KTA. We analyzed the three groups (PAK, KTA-E, KTA-I) for differences in patient characteristics, glycemic control, renal function, patient and kidney graft survival rates, and causes of death. Kidney graft survival rates (actuarial) were similar in the PAK vs. KTA-E groups at one, five, and 10 yr post-transplant: 98%, 82%, and 67% (PAK) vs. 100%, 84%, and 62% (KTA-E) (p = 0.9). The long-term (greater than four yr post-transplant) estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was higher in the PAK than in the KTA-E group: 53 +/- 20 mL/min (PAK) vs. 43 +/- 16 mL/min (KTA-E) (p = 0.016). The patient survival rates were also similar for the PAK and KTA-E groups. We conclude that the subsequent transplant of a pancreas after an LD kidney transplant does not adversely affect patient or kidney graft survival rates; in fact, it is associated with better long-term kidney graft function.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Pancreas transplantation

Over the last 5 years, there has been a resumed interest in treating diabetes by transplantation, particularly islet transplantation. However, despite advances being reported in Canada and the US, replication in the UK has been much more difficult. At present there is still only one treatment that can consistently reverse insulin independence in the long-term and that is whole pancreas transplantation. Long-term normoglycaemia has beneficial effects on preventing and ameliorating the secondary complications of diabetes and will be discussed.

Kidney function after solitary pancreas transplantation

Preserving kidney function in patients after solitary pancreas transplantation (SPTx) is an important consideration, yet various factors may negatively impact long-term function of the native kidneys or kidney allograft. To determine changes in kidney function over time in a series of patients receiving SPTx, we conducted a retrospective analysis and tracked changes in serum creatinine (SCr) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to 6 months, 1 year, or 3 years after SPTx in a series of pancreas after kidney transplants PAK; (n = 61) and pancreas transplants alone PTA; (n = 27) performed at our institution. The mean follow-up for the PAK and PTA groups was 3.4 and 2.7 years, respectively. In this series, 8% of patients after SPTx developed significant kidney failure, defined by either initiation of dialysis or receiving a kidney transplant (PAK-6, PTA-1). Twenty seven percent of SPTx patients with a baseline GFR < 60 suffered either an elevated SCr > 2.2, dialysis, or kidney transplant, whereas no patients with a baseline GFR > 60 developed significant kidney dysfunction. In the PAK group, the GFR did not show significant deterioration over time. In contrast to relatively stable kidney function in PAK patients, PTA patients experienced overall significantly greater rates of decline over time. GFR in PTA patients decreased from 78 +/- 19 (40 to 114) mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 65 +/- 20 at 1 year (P = .006), while SCr increased from 1.03 +/- 0.25 mg/dL to 1.28 +/- 0.43 over the same time period (P = .012). These data show that kidney function may deteriorate after SPTx and proper patient selection may reduce the frequency of this complication.

The first case of single pancreas transplantation in Hungary

Az 1-es típusú inzulindependens cukorbetegség veseelégtelenséggel szövődött esetében a kombinált hasnyálmirigy- és veseátültetés az egyetlen olyan rutineljárás, mely inzulin nélkül normoglycaemiássá teszi a beteget jó vesefunkció mellett. A cukorbetegek egy részénél megtartott vesefunkció mellett is kialakulhat számos szövődmény. Ilyen esetben lehet választandó eljárás a hasnyálmirigy önmagában történő átültetése. 6 évvel hasnyálmirigy-transzplantációs programunk elindítását követően elvégeztük az első szóló hasnyálmirigy-átültetést. A beteg egy 40 éves férfi volt. Enterális drenázst alkalmaztunk portális vénás drenázs mellett. Időben kiterjesztett indukciós kezelésre IL-2-receptor-gátlót használtunk. A műtétből eredő technikai és immunológiai nehézségek ellenére szövődményünk nem volt, illetőleg kilökődést nem észleltünk. 3 évvel a műtét után betegünk életminősége jó, vesefunkciója megtartott, és nem szorul inzulinkezelésre. Összefoglalva megállapíthatjuk, hogy a szoliter hasnyálmirigy-átültetés rutinszerűen jó eredményekkel használható terápiás lehetőség az I-es típusú cukorbetegség veseelégtelenséggel nem komplikált eseteiben.

Patient and graft survival implications of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation from old donors

We investigated graft and patient survival implications of simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant from old donors. Data describing patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus listed for an SPK transplant from 1994 to 2005 were drawn from Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registries. Allograft survival, patient survival and long-term survival expectations among SPK recipients from young (age <45 years) and old (age >/=45 years) donors were modeled by multivariate regression. We also examined predictors of reduced early access to young donor transplants. Of 16 496 eligible SPK candidates, 8850 patients (53.6%) received an SPK transplant and 776 (8.8%) of these transplants were from old donors. Reasonable 5-year, death-censored kidney (77.8 %) and pancreas (71.3%) survivals were achieved with old donors. SPK transplantation from both young and old donors predicted lower mortality compared to continued waiting. An additional expected wait of 1.5 years for a young donor equalized long-term survival expectations to that achieved with use of old donors. Early allocation of young donor transplants declined in the more recent era and varied by region, candidate age, blood type and sensitization. We conclude that old SPK donors should be considered for patients with decreased access to young donor transplants. Prospective evaluation of this practice is needed.

An Overview of Solid Organ Transplantation

Once a medical curiosity, solid organ transplantation is now a commonplace occurrence, with more than 27,000 procedures performed in the United States in 2004 alone. This article offers an overview of the various solid organ transplant procedures to provide a context within which subsequent articles on pulmonary complications can be viewed.

Half-Life Analysis of Pancreas and Kidney Transplants

Although graft and patient survival data are available for pancreas and kidney transplants, they are rarely reported in terms of half-life. Our aim was to determine whether a more relevant measure of outcome is patient and allograft half-life. Using the data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Registry on kidney and pancreas transplants from January 1988 to December 1996, patient and graft half-life and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and demographic variables compared. No significant differences were found between demographic variables. Kidneys transplanted in diabetics as a simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) fared better than diabetics receiving a kidney alone (9.6 vs. 6.3 years). Pancreatic graft survival in an SPK pair was better than pancreas after kidney transplant or pancreas transplant alone (11.2 vs. 2.5 years). Because kidney and pancreatic grafts have a longer half-life when transplanted with their mate grafts, we should consider the relative benefits of SPKs over pancreas after kidney transplant or pancreas transplant alone to limit the loss of precious resources.

Pancreas transplantation: indications and consequences

Pancreas transplantation continues to evolve as a strategy in the management of diabetes mellitus. The first combined pancreas-kidney transplant was reported in 1967, but pancreas transplant now represents a number of procedures, each with different indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. This review will summarize these procedures, including their risks and outcomes in comparison to kidney transplantation alone, and how or if they affect the consequences of diabetes: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and microvascular and macrovascular complications. In addition, the new risks introduced by immunosuppression will be reviewed, including infections, cancer, osteoporosis, reproductive function, and the impact of immunosuppression medications on blood pressure, lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is imperative that an endocrinologist remain involved in the care of the pancreas transplant recipient, even when glucose is normal, because of the myriad of issues encountered post transplant, including ongoing management of diabetic complications, prevention of bone loss, and screening for failure of the pancreas graft with reinstitution of treatment when indicated. Although long-term patient and graft survival have improved greatly after pancreas transplant, a multidisciplinary team is needed to maximize long-term quality, as well as quantity, of life for the pancreas transplant recipient.

Pancreatic transplantation: Beta cell replacement

Diabetes is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications of diabetes including renal failure, retinopathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease limit both survival and quality of life. Pancreatic transplantation can restore euglycemia thereby stabilizing or even reversing secondary complications of diabetes as well as improving quality of life particularly in patients with labile diabetes. Recent evidence also shows an improved survival in diabetic patients that undergo pancreatic transplantation when combined with a kidney transplant. Pancreatic transplantation should more properly be referred to as beta cell replacement as the field today encompasses both whole organ and islet cell transplantation. We have outlined herein the indications and contraindications to islet or whole organ pancreas transplantation and we have described periprocedure care and short- and long-term prognosis.

[Pancreatic transplantation: 1. Indications and results]

In the face of a rising incidence of diabetes, pancreatic transplantation seems to be the only treatment capable of normalizing glycosylated hemoglobin and stabilizing or improving the complications of diabetes. To date, more than 19,000 pancreatic transplantations have been done worldwide. Surgical indications must take into account the constraints and risks specific to the diabetic illness, the risks of a complex surgical procedure, and the absolute necessity for long term immunosuppression. Combined kidney/pancreas transplantation is the most common procedure (90% of cases) and is the most effective treatment for renal insufficiency due to diabetes. Results have improved significantly over the last ten Years due to improvements in the surgical technique and to improvement of immunosuppressive regimens. Results are at least as good and perhaps better than those achieved in the transplantation of other solid organs; patient survival, renal graft survival, and pancreatic graft survival are respectively 95%, 92%, and 85% at one Year. Results of pancreatic transplantation alone have improved and now seem equal to those of combined organ transplantation. Transplantation seems to be cost-effective in the overall care of advanced diabetes, particularly in those patients on chronic dialysis or having degenerative complications.

Transplantation as a therapeutic option for diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy affects both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with a frequency of 20-30%. The first sign is microalbuminuria within a range of 30-300 mg/24h, frequently evolving towards frank proteinuria and renal failure. Tight glucose control, control of arterial hypertension with the use of ACEi or ARB can retard progression. Once renal failure is established, kidney transplantation can be considered for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Quality of life and survival are improved with this procedure. In type 1 diabetes, simultaneous grafting of a kidney and pancreas considerably improves quality of life and diabetic complications. Surgical and infectious complications are sporadic drawbacks of this procedure. Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) remains controversial, since a retrospective study in 2003 by Venstrom concluded that survival for PTA patients is worse than for comparable patients remaining on the waiting list. PTA can be considered for type 1 diabetic patients without advanced renal failure with severe and frequent metabolic instability (hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis). Islet transplantation is still an experimental but promising procedure in highly selected patients, avoiding major abdominal surgery.

Incidence, timing and site of infections among pancreas transplant recipients

The incidence, timing and site of infections among the different categories of pancreas transplant recipients were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups: pancreas transplant alone (PTA), pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), or simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants. Length of follow-up, time to death, pancreas graft survival, incidence, timing and site of bacterial infections were noted. Our study showed that at least 75% of pancreas transplant recipients experienced at least one infection (range from 77.8% in the PTA group to 86.7% in the PAK group). The SPK group presented the highest rate of infections with 35.1 infections per 1000/patient-days. Symptomatic urinary tract infections were the most common cause of infection in all patients. The incidence of infections was higher during the first month after transplantation, except for the SPK transplant group, where infections occurred over a longer time period.

Chronic rejection: the next major challenge for pancreas transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

With newer immunosuppressive agents, acute rejection and graft loss resulting from acute rejection have become less common for pancreas transplant recipients. As long-term graft survival rates have improved, an increasing number of grafts are being lost to chronic rejection (CR). We studied the incidence of CR and identified risk factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all cadaver pancreas transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between June 19, 1994, and December 31, 2002. We determined the causes of graft loss, the incidence of graft loss to CR and, using multivariate techniques, the major risk factors for CR.

RESULTS

A total of 914 cadaver pancreas transplants were performed in the following three categories: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) (n=321), pancreas after kidney (PAK) (n=389), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) (n=204). The mean recipient age was 41.3 years and the mean donor age was 30.1 years. Of the 914 pancreas grafts, 643 (70.3%) continue to function (mean length of follow-up, 39 months). The most common cause of graft loss was technical failure, accounting for 118 (12.9%) of the failed grafts. The second most common cause was CR, accounting for 80 (8.8%) of the failed grafts. The incidence of graft loss to CR was highest for PTA (n=23 [11.3%]) and PAK (n=45 [11.6%]) recipients and lowest for SPK recipients (n=12 [3.7%]) (P=0.002). By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factors for graft loss to CR were a previous episode of acute rejection (relative risk [RR]=4.41, P<0.0001), an isolated (vs. simultaneous) transplant (PAK or PTA [vs. SPK], RR=3.02, P=0.002), cytomegalovirus infection posttransplant (RR=2.41, P=0.001), a retransplant (versus primary transplant) (RR=2.27, P=0.004), and one or two (vs. zero) antigen mismatches at the B loci (RR=1.68, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

As short-term pancreas transplant results improve and as isolated (PAK or PTA) pancreas transplants gain in popularity, CR will become increasingly common as a cause of pancreas graft loss.

Quality of life after kidney and pancreas transplantation: a review

There is an increasing amount of data on quality of life (QOL) in most chronic illnesses; some of the instruments used are generic, but recently, there is a tendency to use disease-specific instruments. We propose that recipients of organ transplants be assessed routinely for QOL by means of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey or a disease-specific instrument; for compliance, by means of the Long-Term Medication Behavior Self-Efficacy Scale; and for psychological status, by means of the Beck Depression Inventory Brief Symptom Inventory or the Symptom Checklist. The widespread use of QOL data in recipients of organ transplants will increase accountability of service providers and eventually increase patient satisfaction because these instruments are patient reported.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant from living related donor: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeutic option for insulin-dependent uremic patients. In 1996 the first SPK from a live donor was performed. This procedure offers the advantage of a better immunologic match, reduced cold ischemia injury, and decreased waiting time. As such, it is an attractive alternative treatment for diabetic patients with end-stage nephropathy with an available living donor.

METHODS

We performed six SPKs from living-related donors. There were four men and two women among the recipients; median age was 34 (range, 29-39) years. All donors were recipients' siblings with excellent HLA matching. Donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, anti-insulin and anti-islet antibody assays, and computed tomography of the abdomen. Both donors and recipients were treated with octreotide for 5 days perioperatively. After transplantation, the patients were maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the exception of one recipient of SPK from an identical twin, who received cyclosporine monotherapy.

RESULTS

All the donors are doing well and have normal renal function and blood glucose levels. One-year patient, renal, and pancreatic graft survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 83%, respectively. Acute kidney rejection was documented in two patients, and both recovered completely after OKT3 therapy. No rejection of pancreatic graft has been documented. Except for one patient who lost the graft because of hemorrhagic pancreatitis, all recipients maintained serum glucose levels at less than 130 mg/dL without insulin therapy. No major surgical complications such as graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, or abscess were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Living donor SPK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK. The procedure can be performed safely in the donor and with low morbidity in the recipient.

Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation

Despite recent advancements in surgical technique and immunosuppressive therapy, postoperative complications of pancreatic transplantation are still common. A complex spectrum of such adverse events includes graft rejection, peripancreatic fluid collections, pancreatitis, exocrine leaks, vascular thrombosis, and hemorrhage. Sonography plays a key role in the initial evaluation of the transplanted pancreas. Gray-scale sonography, duplex Doppler imaging, and sonographic guidance for percutaneous biopsy all contribute to posttransplantation evaluation and detection of sequelae. Color and power Doppler imaging offer valuable information regarding the regional vasculature and potential vascular complications. Because gray-scale sonographic findings alone are often nonspecific, several clinical criteria, including those from biochemical analysis of the urine and serum, must be reviewed with the sonographic findings to provide a thorough evaluation of the transplanted pancreas. When used in conjunction with serologic and urinary markers, the findings from sonography can help direct management options or suggest the need for further examination. Therefore, an understanding of the spectrum of complications combined with knowledge concerning the limitations of this imaging modality are essential for proper diagnosis and effective treatment.