Exposure, dissection, and laser versus electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Rouvière's Sulcus as a Landmark for a Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Interim Analysis of a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence and Morphologic Type of Rouvière's Sulcus in the Italian Population

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic gallstones. The large number of gallbladders removed every year is not fully consistent with the excessively high incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI). Several strategies have been suggested to reduce this risk. Among them, the use of extra biliary anatomic structures, such as the Rouvière's sulcus, as a landmark to guide the surgeon during dissection has been proposed as a means to prevent IBDI. The main aim of the present paper is the evaluation of the prevalence of Rouvière's sulcus (RS) and its anatomic variants in a given population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional, and multicenter study has been conducted at the Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery of the "Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria," Terni (Italy), at the Department of Surgical Sciences of the "Azienda Ospedaliera Perugia," Perugia (Italy) and at the Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the "Policlinico Umberto I," Rome (Italy). Intraoperative images of 111 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analyzed to identify the presence and type of RS, according to the Singh-Prasad classification and the Dahmane classification.

RESULTS

RS was present in 93 (83.8%) patients. Singh-Prasad type 1A is present in 48.4% of patients, type 1B in 25.8%, type 2 in 12.9% and type 3 in 12.9%. Dahmane's open type is present in 48.4% of patients and fused type in 51.6%.

CONCLUSION

Due to its high prevalence, RS can be used as an anatomic landmark and probably reduces the incidence of IBDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a gallbladder with a right sided round ligament using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The gallbladder with a right sided round ligament is a rare anomaly. It is frequently associated with various biliary, vascular, and other anomalies. Herein, we present a case of a gallbladder with a right-sided round ligament treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 50-year-old woman had right upper quadrant discomfort. Gallbladder stones, a polyp, and a right-sided round ligament were found on preoperative computed tomography. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was decided. During surgery, "fundus first technique" was performed and the biliary anatomy was confirmed with the aid of indocyanine green fluorescence guidance. The gallbladder was attached to segment 4 of the liver which was the left side of the round ligament. Cystic artery and cystic duct were ligated safely. The patient had no postoperative complication.

DISCUSSION

Although there are various anomalies in patients having a gallbladder with a rights-sided round ligament, ICG fluorescence imaging can show the anatomy of the extrahepatic biliary tree. It can enable surgeons to recognize concomitant vascular and biliary anomalies.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder with a right-sided round ligament can be safely performed by identifying biliary anatomy with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

Diode laser surgery versus electrocautery in the treatment of inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of diode laser and electrocautery techniques for inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia (IFH) removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 40 individuals were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 (G1) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with diode laser and group 2 (G2) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with electrocautery. The following transoperative parameters were evaluated: bleeding, temperature, and surgical technique parameters (energy deposited on tissue, flow rate, and time of incision). The postoperative parameters evaluated were as follows: pain, functional alterations (chewing, speaking), analgesic medication intake, swelling, healing of the wound area, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Among the 40 individuals included in the study, four (two in G1 and two in G2) did not complete the entire follow-up. Therefore, 36 individuals (18 in G1 and 18 in G2) participated. Participants in G1 and in G2 had similar demographic characteristics. No difference regarding the trans- or postoperative parameters evaluated was observed between G1 and G2 (p > 0.05). Also, no difference regarding the time for healing was observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Diode laser seems to be as effective and safe as electrocautery when applied under similar conditions for IFH removal.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

IFH corresponds to 65% of the lesions observed in denture wearers. This study shows that under similar conditions diode laser is as effective and safe as electrocautery for removal of IFH.

Clinical significance and characteristics of left-sided gallbladder: case series study of 10 patients

Purpose

The aims of this case series study were to review the 10 patients who were diagnosed with left-sided gallbladder and analyze their anatomic variations in the bile duct, portal vein, and hepatic vessels.

Methods

In this case series study, 10 patients with left-sided gallbladder were retrospectively analyzed at 2 tertiary referral centers between April 2004 and May 2019.

Results

Mean age was 61.1 years; there were 7 women and 3 men. Ten patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis or symptomatic gallbladder stone. The mean operation time was 77.2 minutes. Three ports were used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 days, and there were no cases of surgery-related morbidity. Two patients had type 1 bile duct and 3 had type 3 bile duct (2 type 3B and 1 type 3A). The right posterior portal vein as the first branch of the main portal vein was observed in all patients. Segment IV branches of the left portal vein crossing over to the segment VIII territory were observed in 7 of the 10 patients.

Conclusion

Although left-sided gallbladder is a very rare disease, it is possible to diagnose it preoperatively and perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy safely by adjusting port position. The common important features of left-sided gallbladder include distribution of the left portal vein crossing over to the right side of the liver and increased size of the left portal vein. These variations may have important clinical implications in the management of hepatic resection including donor hepatectomy.

Anatomy and surgical relevance of Rouviere's sulcus

Rouviere's sulcus (RS) (i.e., incisura hepatis dextra, Gans incisura) represents an important anatomical landmark. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of the RS, its description, its location, its relations to the right portal pedicle and to the plane of the common bile duct, and the evaluation of the surgical relevance of the obtained data. Forty macroscopically healthy and undamaged livers were removed during autopsies from cadavers of both sexes. The RS was present in 82% of the cases and in these the open RS was identified in 70% of the livers. The fused type was observed in 12% of the cases; 18% of the livers had no sulcus. The mean length of the open type RS was 28 ± 2 mm (range 24-32 mm) and its mean depth was 6 ± 2 mm (range 4-8 mm). The right posterior sectional pedicle was found in the RS in 70% of the cases. In 5% of the livers, we also dissected a branch of the anterior sectional pedicle. Inside 25% of the RS, we found the vein of segment 6. The RS identification may avoid bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and enables elective vascular control during the right liver resection.

A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety

Bile duct injuries (BDI) during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) occur more frequently than during an open cholecystectomy. Many expert surgeons learn to perform procedures safely based on their experience. Above all, the critical view of safety (CVS) introduced by Strasberg in 1995 is the standard practice to prevent BDI during an LC. The CVS is achieved by clearing all fat and fibrous tissue in Calot's triangle, after which the cystic structures can be clearly identified, occluded, and divided. Failure to successfully create this view may be an indication for conversion to an open cholecystectomy. The Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) introduced an accreditation examination in 2004. The critical view is an important factor used to judge a safe dissection. The annual ratios of successful applicants were 63% in 2004, 45% in 2005, 36% in 2006, 39% in 2007, and 44% in 2008. Biennial questionnaire surveys by JSES show that the laparoscopic BDI rates were 0.66% in 1990-2001, 0.79% in 2002, 0.77% in 2003, 0.66% in 2004, 0.77% in 2005, 0.65% in 2006, and 0.58% in 2007. Therefore, 2007 was the first year in which the rate was below 0.6%. A decreasing BDI rate is therefore expected because successful candidates will introduce technical improvements to colleagues in their hospitals and local regions.

Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps

Three hundred six injuries or complications coincident to 296 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were analyzed for the nature and extent of injuries and litigious outcomes that followed. The data were drawn from 31 member companies of the Physician Insurers Association of America, a trade association that initiated the study. The outcomes were compared to 261 contemporaneous open cholecystectomy claims. Biliary tract injuries were the most common, accounting for almost two thirds of all injuries. The spectrum of cases, originally selected for indemnity potential, reflected relative incidences in the medical literature. Laparoscopic injuries were significantly more severe, more likely to result in indemnity, and more apt to involve higher mean +/- standard deviation dollar values (160 dollars +/- 154 x 10(3)) to surviving claimants than injuries resulting from open procedures (106 dollars +/- 122 x 10(3), P = 0.01). Injury recognition at the time of the original procedure had no discernible mitigating effect because 80% of recognized injuries required an additional operative procedure. Risk-aversive behavior should include paying particular attention to placement of the first port, more liberal use of the Hasson technique, placement of all other ports under direct vision, elimination of intraoperative anatomic uncertainty, programmed inspection of the abdomen before withdrawing the laparoscope, and acquiring sufficient knowledge of electrosurgical principles to ensure the safe use of this potentially dangerous modality.

Minimally invasive surgery

With the widespread introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in late 1989, the practice and expectations of general surgery were changed forever. The techniques of laparoscopy were not new--they had been adopted by gynecologists and orthopedic surgeons at least a decade before--but it was laparoscopic cholecystectomy that captured the attention of the surgical profession and the public and spawned the tremendous growth in what has come to be called minimally invasive surgery. Although this surgery has tremendous appeal, offering quicker recovery, less pain, and possibly greater safety, it presents new challenges in the areas of training, credentialing, and quality assessment and raises serious questions about the real benefits of new technology at a time when the political and economic sensitivity of these issues is greater than ever. In this chapter I limit myself to a discussion of laparoscopy in general surgery, with a focus on what we have learned from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and on what this knowledge suggests for the future of other laparoscopic general surgical procedures.