Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Direct insertion of the trocar is an alternative method to Veress needle insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these two entry closed techniques.

DATA SOURCE

A systematic review of the literature was done on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and EBSCO.

METHODS

The literature search was constructed until May 01, 2022, around search terms for "Veress," "direct trocar," "needle," "insertion," and "laparoscopic ways of entry." This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement 2020.

RESULTS

Sixteen controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 observational studies were included in the systematic review. We found no significant differences in the risk of major complication during the access manoeuvres between DTI and VN: bowel injuries (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.36, P = 0.63), major vascular injuries (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.56-5.38, P = 0.34), port site hernia (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.28-20.71, P = 0.42). DTI has a lower risk of minor complications such as subcutaneous emphysema (OR = 5.19 95% CI: 2.27-11.87, P < 0.0001), extraperitoneal insufflation (OR = 5.93 95% CI: 1.69-20.87, P = 0.006), omental emphysema (OR = 18.41, 95% CI: 7. 01-48.34, P < 0.00001), omental bleeding (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.18-4.55, P = 0.01), and lower number of unsuccessful entry or insufflation attempts (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.05-4.81, P = 0.04). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of time required to achieve complete insufflation (MD =  - 15.53, 95% CI: - 91.32 to 60.27, P = 0.69), trocar site bleeding (OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.25-1.79, P = 0.42), and trocar site infection (OR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.34-4.20, P = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of major complications during the access manoeuvres between DTI and VN. A lower number of minor complications were observed in DTI compared with those in Veress access.

Comparison Between Closed and Open Methods for Creating Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: To study the efficacy of closed and open methods for creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the two in terms of their outcome and complication. Study Design: Single-centre, prospective, observational study. Materials and study: Purposive sampling method where the inclusion criteria were all patients with cholelithiasis who were advised and consented to laparoscopic cholecystectomy of age 18-70 years were included in the study group. Exclusion criteria include patients with a paraumbilical hernia, a history of upper abdominal surgery, uncontrolled systemic illness, and local skin infection. Sixty cases of cholelithiasis satisfying exclusion and inclusion criteria who underwent elective cholecystectomy during the study period were included. Thirty-one of these cases underwent the closed method, while in the remaining 29 patients open method was adopted. Cases in which pneumoperitoneum created by closed technique were grouped as group A and those by open technique as group B. Parameters comparing the safety and efficacy of the two methods were studied. The parameters were access time, gas leak, visceral injury, vascular injury, need for conversion, umbilical port site hematoma, umbilical port site infection, and hernia. Patients were assessed on the first postoperative day, the seventh postoperative day, and then two months after surgery. Some follow-ups were done telephonically. Results: Out of 60 patients, 31 underwent the closed method, while 29 underwent the open method. Minor complications like gas leak during the procedure was observed more in the open method. The mean access time in the open-method group was less than in the closed-method group. Other complications like visceral injury, vascular injury, need for conversion, umbilical port site hematoma, umbilical port site infection, and hernia were not observed in either group during the allocated follow-up period in the study. Conclusion: Open technique for pneumoperitoneum is as safe and effective as the closed technique.

Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy

PURPOSE

To determine the benefits and safety of direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle technique in obese women undertaking diagnostic laparoscopy procedures.

METHODS

Randomized-controlled trial on 135 obese women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy and dye test for infertility was conducted. Women were randomly assigned to either direct trocar access (n = 68) or Veress needle access (n = 67) before achieving pneumoperitoneum. The same surgeon executed the laparoscopic techniques with a single-puncture technique. The primary outcome measures included total length of the procedure and incidence of any complications, while the mean laparoscopic entry time, volume of CO₂ required, and total of tries needed to attain successful entry were secondary outcomes. Intention-to-treat principle was applied to analysis.

RESULTS

Women in both groups had similar socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and none were lost to follow-up. The overall length of the procedure was significantly lesser in the direct trocar group compared to the Veress needle group (9.9 ± 6.0 vs 16.7 ± 4.7 min; p < 0.001). No significant differences occurred in other outcomes including mean entry time, volume of CO₂ used, number of attempts for successful entry, and major/minor complications (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct trocar technique may be an effective alternative to Veress needle for pneumoperitoneum in obese women for diagnostic laparoscopy. It has a comparable rapid laparoscopic entry time but a significantly lower duration of the procedure and shorter exposure to anesthesia. Both methods are equally effective as there was no significant difference in the complications recorded. A greater sample trial may be essential for more corroborative substantiation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PACTR201510000999192.

Laparoscopic ovariectomy with a single-port multiple-access device in seven African lionesses (Panthera leo)

CASE DESCRIPTION 7 privately owned female African lions (Panthera leo) that had been bred for public exhibition and were housed in outdoor pens were evaluated prior to undergoing elective ovariectomy. CLINICAL FINDINGS All animals were healthy. Median age was 15 months (range, 9 to 34 months), and median body weight was 71 kg (156 lb; range, 48 to 145 kg [106 to 319 lb]). TREATMENT AND OUTCOME Surgical sterilization by means of single-incision laparoscopic ovariectomy was elected. A 2- to 3-cm-long skin incision was made just caudal to the umbilicus, and a single-port multiple-access device was bluntly inserted through the incision. Traction was maintained with stay sutures to provide counterpressure, and three 5-mm-diameter cannulae were introduced through the device's access channels with a blunt trocar. The abdomen was insufflated to a pressure of 12 mm Hg with CO₂. Each ovary was grasped and suspended with a standard 36-cm-long laparoscopic grasper, and ovariectomy was performed with a 5-mm vessel sealer and divider device. Because of the depth of subcutaneous fat, extensive subcutaneous dissection was necessary to insert the single-port device. In contrast, fat content of the mesovarium was minimal and did not vary markedly among animals. Subjectively, single-incision laparoscopic ovariectomy was easily performed, but all surgeons had experience in laparoscopic surgery. Median duration of the surgical procedure was 29 minutes (range, 21 to 49 minutes). No perioperative complications were encountered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Findings suggested that the single-incision laparoscopic technique may be an acceptable, minimally invasive option for ovariectomy of large felids.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With History of Gastrectomy

Background and Objectives:

Patients with previous gastrectomy have an increased incidence of gallstones and gallbladder morbidity requiring surgery. We investigated the possible risk factors that contribute to severe gallbladder disease in patients with previous gastrectomy and the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of these patients.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, we reviewed a database of patients who underwent LC in our hospital during the period January 1, 2010, through May 1, 2015.

Results:

The average operation time in patients with previous gastrectomy was longer (P < .05), but the operation times of patients with a long interval (>5 years) between gastrectomy and LC showed no statistical difference from those of patients without a history of gastrectomy (P > .05). The conversion rate did not differ between the 2 groups (P > .05), but in patients with previous gastrectomy, the conversion rate was significantly reduced after we adopted a comprehensive preoperative evaluation procedure (P < .05). The frequency of cholecystitis attacks, rate of combination with gallbladder polyps, and rate of combination with pancreatitis were higher and gallstone formation time shorter, in the patients with malignant tumor, those undergoing Billroth II gastroenterostomy or esophagojejunostomy, and those with accompanying diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolemia (P < .05).

Conclusion:

LC plays an important role in the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases in patients with a history of gastrectomy, and a comprehensive preoperative evaluation and accomplished surgical technique are necessary for successful outcomes. Previously identified clinical features may represent a risk factor for severe cholecystic morbidity in these patients.

Prevention and acute management of biliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Expert consensus statement

Gallstone disease is very common and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures all over the world. Parallel to the increase in the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies, bile duct injuries also increased. The reported incidence of bile duct injuries ranges from 0.3% to 1.4%. Many of the bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are not due to inexperience, but are the result of basic technical failures and misinterpretations. A working group of expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons, an endoscopist, and a specialist of forensic medicine study searched and analyzed the publications on safe cholecystectomy and biliary injuries complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the organization of Turkish Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Association. After a series of e-mail communications and two conferences, the expert panel developed consensus statements for safe cholecystectomy, management of biliary injuries and medicolegal issues. The panel concluded that iatrogenic biliary injury is an overwhelming complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an important issue in malpractice claims. Misidentification of the biliary system is the major cause of biliary injuries. To avoid this, the "critical view of safety" technique should be employed in all the cases. If biliary injury is identified intraoperatively, reconstruction should only be performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons. In the postoperative period, any deviation from the expected clinical course of recovery should alert the surgeon about the possibility of biliary injury.

The all-seeing needle instead of the Veress needle in pediatric urologic laparoscopy

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of the all-seeing needle for safe entry and creation of pneumoperitoneum in pediatric urologic laparoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 14 children underwent various transperitoneal urologic laparoscopic procedures. The all-seeing needle, which is 4.85F in diameter, was used for safe entry into the abdominal cavity at the site of the umblicus in all cases. The microoptic was integrated with the light system and connected via a zoom ocular enabling direct visualization of the layers between the skin and the peritoneal cavity. Once the intraperitoneal access was obtained, CO2 pneumoperitoneum was created from one port of the three-way connector attached to the proximal part of the needle. Then the laparoscopic trocars were placed under vision of the microoptical system.

RESULTS

Mean age of the children was 4.5 ± 2.9 years. In all children, the all-seeing needle was safely introduced into the abdominal cavity under direct vision. Then, CO2 pneumoperitoneum was succesfully performed. The mean time for optical puncture was calculated as 1.1 ± 0.8 minutes. No complication was encountered during the introduction of the needle, creation of the pneumoperitoneum, and placement of the trocars.

CONCLUSIONS

The all-seeing needle appears to be beneficial in safe entry and for creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic pediatric urology cases. It eliminates the disadvantages of the Veress needle, which is blunt insertion, and may possibly prevent complications.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Ventral hernias, whether naturally occurring or the result of previous surgery, comprise one of the most common problems confronting general surgeons. As many as 25% of laparotomy incisions develop a hernia over long-term follow-up, which is a difficult problem with many treatment algorithms. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has improved over the last decade and has proven to be an effective treatment option. With fewer wound complications and low recurrence rates, it is a useful tool in the surgeon's armamentarium. Care should be taken regarding patient selection, operative technique, and mesh size to ensure adequate repair of the hernia, thereby preventing recurrence at a later date. The first attempt at a hernia repair has the highest chance of long-term success, so it is important that the surgeon take all the factors into mind before proceeding with operative repair.

UREKA: umbilical ring easy kannula access

The umbilical ring easy kannula access appears to provide a safe portal of laparoscopic entry in pediatric patients with few complications.

Background and Objectives:

Standard techniques of laparoscopic access involve creating an abdominal wall defect and can result in complications. We describe the umbilical ring easy kannula access (UREKA) technique, evaluating safety and a decrease in complications related to port placement.

Methods:

UREKA is performed via a supra- or infraumbilical incision followed by circumferential dissection of the umbilical stalk. The umbilical skin is dissected free from the fascia, exposing the umbilical ring. Pneumoperitoneum is established either before or after placement of a dilating port through the open ring. We reviewed all laparoscopic procedures performed by one pediatric surgeon over 14 months using UREKA.

Results:

Ninety-four patients underwent laparoscopic surgery with initial port placement via UREKA. Appendectomy (n=57) was the most common procedure, followed by fundoplication (15) and cholecystectomy (10). No intestinal, solid organ, vascular, or bladder injuries related to port placement occurred. The only postoperative complication was a superficial wound infection in a 135-kg patient following cholecystectomy, treated successfully with oral antibiotics alone.

Conclusion:

The umbilical ring persists to some degree in all pediatric patients and provides a safe portal of entry for laparoscopic surgery. UREKA has few complications and is a straightforward, reproducible technique for gaining initial laparoscopic access.

Is concomitant cholecystectomy safe during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery?

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety of concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS).

METHODS

A total of 1000 patients underwent LARS between May 2004 and August 2009. Patients who had a LARS procedure alone were defined as group A and those who had cholecystectomy during the LARS were defined as group B. All data, including demographics, operative details, perioperative complications, and outcomes, were recorded to the prospective database. Chi-square and t-test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 934 (93.4%) patients in group A and 66 (6.6%) in group B. Cholelithiasis (n = 48) and gallbladder polyp larger than 10 mm (n = 18) were the indications for cholecystectomy. Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups. There were no mortality and conversion. The mean operating time was 50 minutes for group A and 80 minutes for group B (P = 0.0001). The mean hospital stay was 1 day for each group. The mean follow-up was 35 and 38 months for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.195). Esophageal perforation, jejunal perforation, and pulmonary emboli were the major complications and were seen only in group A (P = 0.790). All other peroperative minor complications and postoperative dysphagia, bloating, and reflux recurrence were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LARS and cholecystectomy can be performed safely during the same session without increasing the rates of morbidity and recurrence of reflux.

Access-related complications - an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs

In order to investigate incidence rates and types of access-related complications that may occur during laparoscopic hernioplasty, we carried out a systematic analysis of our collected results. The aim was to identify risk factors and to develop useful modifications of the surgical technique and the instrumentation used. Since we first introduced laparoscopic hernioplasty in our clinic, we have carried out standardised, prospective documentation of relevant data from all consecutive operations in an electronic database. We performed a systematic analysis of access-related complications and their possible influencing factors, taking into special account the type of instruments used, port-site and prior intra-abdominal operations. Between April 1993 and March 2000, 4857 consecutive patients received a total of 6023 laparoscopic hernia repairs. In 510 patients three-edged, sharp trocars were used and in 4347 patients conical obturators were used to insert the port. The incidence of access-related complications was 0.9% (44/4857) in the total collection (incision hernias 0.5%, bleeding from abdominal-wall vessels 0.2%, bowel injury 0.06%, wound infections 0.06%). Injuries to intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal vessels were not observed. A differentiated analysis of the various trocar types, taking into consideration the number of inserted ports, showed that for incisions outside the linea alba the incidence of bleeding from abdominal-wall vessels was 12 times higher (0.7%, 7/1020 versus 0.06%, 5/8694). The incidence of incision hernias increased significantly (1.2%, 12/1020 versus 0.02%, 2/8694; p = 0.03) when three-edged trocars were used, as opposed to conical obturators. Our results demonstrate that, outside the linea alba, three-edged trocars should no longer be used for portinsertion. The results of our differentiated analysis of laparoscopic hernia repairs, taking into account the type of obturator, the port-site and number of ports inserted, also can be applied to other laparoscopic operations.

The efficacy and safety of different techniques for trocar insertion in laparoscopic surgery

A review of the available published data reveals no discernable difference in the safety of the three commonly-used methods of trocar insertion (Veress needle, direct and open) for laparoscopic surgery. Each method has individual advantages and disadvantages, with similar morbidity and mortality, when performed by experienced operators with appropriate indications. The individual surgeon should assess which technique best suits his or her operating style in light of the particular circumstance of each patient. Preference should be given to the method with which the surgeon is most comfortable, or with which he or she has the most experience. All patients should be warned prior to undergoing abdominal surgery that, regardless of the method employed for laparoscopy, penetrating injury to internal structures occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 cases.

The semiopen first umbilical trocar access technique in laparoscopic surgery: easy and safe

BACKGROUND

First access in laparoscopy still causes trouble and a small percentage of visceral and vascular injuries. Residents and surgeons-in-training often have doubts about which technique is safer and "friendlier." Semiopen technique (SO) for the first umbilical trocar access was originally described in 2002. We report our retrospective analysis using SO that shows its safety and easiness.

METHODS

In the period from January 2003 to November 2007, 300 unselected patients, including obese patients (body mass index > 30) were treated with laparoscopy beginning with a periumbilical approach using SO. We usually prefer to enter the cavity with a STEP cannula stiffened by an unarmed Veress needle of 1.9 mm. There were 112 men and 188 women with ages ranging from 16 to 82 years. The procedure was performed by an expert laparoscopic surgeon in 260 cases and by residents or surgeons without expertise in laparoscopy in 40 cases.

RESULTS

We experienced no injuries of the viscera or vessels (0%). The mean time to enter the abdomen was 180 seconds, including obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After our limited experience with the SO, we believe that every surgeon who tries it will experience safety of the Hasson and the comfort of the Veress.

Initial trocar placement and abdominal insufflation in laparoscopic bariatric surgery

INTRODUCTION

Initial trocar placement and abdominal insufflation in laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be challenging for the novice. One technique is the use of an optical viewing trocar without prior abdominal insufflation. This investigation tests the hypothesis that this technique can be taught to novice surgeons with good results.

METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery were included. Novice surgeons (residents/fellows) with 0-50 initial trocar placements placed the initial trocar and insufflated the abdomen in the presence of an expert surgeon (>300 initial trocar placements in morbidly obese patients). Trocar placement time was defined as the time to place the trocar into the peritoneal cavity (including infiltration of local anesthesia and incision). Insufflation time was defined as the time to insufflate the abdomen to a pressure of 10 to 15 mm Hg (including time to place tubing on trocar). Novice times were compared with expert times.

RESULTS

There were 81 patients (56 by expert and 25 by novice) in this study. No bowel or vessel injury during initial trocar placement was noted. No correlation was seen between times and BMI or waist/hip circumference (P = NS). Mean expert trocar placement time was shorter than the mean novice time (25 +/- 9 versus 54 +/- 27 s; P < 0.0001); although there was no difference in mean insufflation time (expert versus novice: 16 +/- 5 versus 19 +/- 10; P = NS). The mean total time to place the initial trocar and insufflate the abdomen for the novices was 72 +/- 26 s.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial trocar placement can be taught safely to novices. The technique using an optical viewing trocar without prior abdominal insufflation is effective and efficient in morbidly obese patients.

Comparison of Nd:YAG Surgical Laser and Remorgida Bipolar Electrosurgery Forceps for Canine Laparoscopic Ovariectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare technique, surgical time, and complications of canine laparoscopic ovariectomy using Nd:YAG surgical laser and Remorgida bipolar electrosurgery forceps.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, prospective clinical trial.

ANIMALS

Female dogs (n=40) for elective ovariectomy.

METHODS

Dogs had bilateral ovariectomy with one ovary randomly assigned to removal by use of Nd:YAG surgical laser with a 600 mum optical fiber in contact mode and the other ovary to removal by use of a Remorgida forceps (featuring bipolar electrocoagulation with simultaneous sharp resection). Duration of predetermined surgery intervals and complications were compared between techniques. Additionally, the effects of several intraoperative variables on surgical time were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ovariectomy by use of Remorgida forceps required significantly less time than laser ovariectomy but intraoperative hemorrhage was not reduced. Surgical time was significantly increased in obese dogs, depending on the amount of fat in the ovarian ligament. Intraoperative hemorrhage had no significant influence on surgical time.

CONCLUSION

Both ovariectomy techniques were effective but the Remorgida forceps can be used as a relatively inexpensive, stand-alone device that decreases surgical time compared with Nd:YAG laser ovariectomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Novel techniques, such as laser and combined bipolar electrosurgical and cutting forceps aim to reduce surgery duration, complication rates and recovery time in laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure

BACKGROUND

Despite the good results reported after laparoscopic fundoplication, failure is still a major problem. Hiatal disruption is one of the common patterns of anatomical failure. The aim of this study was to compare the results of suture repair of diaphragmatic crura with routine polypropylene mesh reinforcement in addition to suture repair.

METHODS

A total of 551 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease between March 1998 and July 2004 were included into the study. Crural closure had been performed with simple primary suture repair alone between March 1998 and July 2002 (n = 335, group I), and mesh reinforcement of the hiatal repair was performed routinely thereafter (n = 176, group II). These groups were evaluated prospectively.

RESULTS

We observed a significantly lower rate of recurrence in group II than in group I. After a 2-year follow-up, the rate of anatomic morphologic recurrence was 6.0% in group I and 1.8% in group II. Considering the recurrence rate, there was significant statistical difference. The overall recurrence rate in our series was 4.6%. There was no correlation between the size of the hernia and recurrence. No significant difference was found between groups regarding the rate of postoperative dysphagia. We have not observed any complications related to the use of polypropylene mesh in group II.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that polypropylene mesh reinforcement increases the success rate for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair without causing an additional complication burden. We propose routine use of mesh reinforcement in laparascopic antireflux surgery.

Assessment of quality of life after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

In this study two different quality of life items are compared, and correlation of patient satisfaction with preoperative and postoperative symptoms after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease is evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2002 and December 2004, 60 patients with a diagnosis of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease scheduled for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were recruited prospectively and volunteered to participate in this study. Patients underwent endoscopy, and their disease-specific symptoms were scored on a scale. Quality of life was measured preoperatively and in the first and sixth postoperative months with two questionnaires: Short Form-36 (SF 36) (preoperatively) and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) (postoperatively).

RESULTS

In more than 90% of the patients, typical symptoms (regurgitation and pyrozis) were controlled postoperatively (p < 0.001). In the first postoperative month, however, dysphagia (early dysphagia) was seen in 46 (76%) patients, whereas in the sixth postoperative month (late dysphagia) its incidence decreased to only 2 (3.3%) patients. Similarly, in the first postoperative month 42 (70%) patients had gas bloating, but the incidence of this symptom decreased to 26 (43.3%) patients by the sixth month (p = 0.01). The quality-of-life measurements obtained from both SF 36 and GERD-HRQL showed that quality of life of the patients improved significantly in the related domain of each item after surgery (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective operation that controls the typical symptoms and improves the quality of life of patients, but new-onset symptoms affect postoperative well-being. For closer evaluation of the benefits of the operation, we need new questionnaires that comprehensively evaluate the symptom spectrum of GERD both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute

PURPOSE

Bile duct injury (BDI) represents the most serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this retrospective single-institution study was to evaluate the real incidence of BDI during laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy (OC) in a tertiary academic center in Athens, Greece.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and December 2001, 3637 patients underwent cholecystectomy in our department; as LC in 2079 patients (LC group) and as OC in 1558 patients (OC group). All the LCs were performed or supervised by five staff surgeons and all the OCs were performed or supervised by another five staff surgeons.

RESULTS

There were 13 BDIs associated with LC (0.62%) and 6 associated with OC (0.38%) (P = 0.317). There was one death associated with BDI after LC. Only two (15.4%) of the BDIs associated with LC occurred within the proposed learning curve limit of 50 LCs per individual surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and is not associated with a higher incidence of BDI than OC. Moreover, we did not find that the learning curve for LC affected BDI occurrence.

Safe Veress needle insertion

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

For laparoscopic surgery, the creation of pneumoperitoneum still remains a must. The insertion of a Veress needle or a trocar is never perfectly safe, and almost every kind of intraabdominal organ injury due to these insertions has been reported worldwide. Here, we describe a safe technique for creating pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

For the creation of pneumoperitoneum, under direct vision, the linea alba was elevated with two towel clips and then the Veress needle was inserted. We reviewed 368 patients operated on with this technique for complication rates. Ultrasound images were obtained before and during abdominal-wall lifting in 10 patients.

RESULTS

There were no injuries due to the insertion of the Veress needle or trocars. In 90% of the patients, pneumoperitoneum was created successfully on the first attempt. Ultrasound examination demonstrated a mean extra safe area of 11.8 mm during abdominal-wall lifting with this technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevating the linea alba during Veress-needle insertion is safe.

Delayed Presentation of Ilio-Iliac Arteriovenous Fistula Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treated with Percutaneous Graft-Covered Stent Placement

Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare, usually readily apparent, and immediately treated. We report a case of delayed presentation of a retroperitoneal vascular injury. The patient presented with abdominal pain and increasing edema of the lower extremities 1 year after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and was found to have an ilio-iliac arteriovenous fistula. Endovascular treatment was accomplished using a graft-covered polytetrafluoroethylene stent. The patient remained free of symptoms at 1-year follow-up.

Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures present a dilemma as to the correct mode of entry into the abdominal cavity because the Veress needle (VN) technique seems to be associated with a high risk of vascular and visceral injuries. Direct trocar insertion (DTI) has been reported as an alternative to the VN for creation of the pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

An open comparative randomized prospective study was conducted on the feasibility and safety of DTI vs the VN technique in nonobese patients of any age category referred for urgent or scheduled laparoscopic procedures. Exclusion criteria were obesity (defined as a body mass index [BMI] > 27 kg/m(2)), major abdominal distension, and two or more previous abdominal operations. The study endpoints were the feasibility and safety of the DTI and VN techniques. Results were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Statistical analysis was carried out with the t-test for independent samples, the chi-square tests, and the Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate. The level of significance was 0.01.

RESULTS

Since January 2002, a total of 598 nonobese patients have been entered into the current trial; 46% (mean BMI 21.6 A+/- 4.4 kg/m(2)) were randomly allocated to DTI, whereas 54% (BMI 21.1 A+/- 5.3 kg/m(2)) were allocated to the VN techniques. Demographic features and type of procedures were similar for the two groups. DTI was feasible in 100% of patients vs 98.7% in the VN group (p = NS). Minor complications were nil in the DTI group and 5.9% in the VN group (p < 0.01). The latter group consisted of 11 cases (3.4%) of subcutaneous emphysema and eight cases (2.5%) of extraperitoneal insufflation. Major complications were nil in the DTI group and 1.3% among VN patients (p = NS). These latter cases consisted of two (0.3%) hepatic lesions managed laparoscopically; one (0.3%) misdiagnosed ileal perforation requiring reintervention, and one (0.3%) mesenteric laceration treated conservatively.

CONCLUSION

In thin and very thin patients of any age category with no more than one previous abdominal operation, DTI is a safe alternative to the VN technique and is associated with fewer minor complications. In terms of major complications, there is no difference between the two techniques. Either technique of access is acceptable Thin and very thin patients undergoing laparoscopy, on condition that the basic principles of laparoscopic surgery are complied with.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy gained wide acceptance as treatment of choice for gallstone disease and cholecystitis. With this new technique, not only did the new era of minimal invasive surgery begin, but also the spectrum of complications changed. Laparoscopy-related complications such as access injuries and procedure-related problems are discussed in our article. Typical mishaps are reviewed according to the literature. Set-up of the pneumoperitoneum (morbidity up to 0.2%); bleeding-from trocar sites and vascular injury (mortality up to 0.2%); biliary leaks and bile duct injuries are the main topics in this article (still on a level of 0.2%-0.8%). Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment are discussed, and an overview of the most cited classifications of bile duct injuries is summarised graphically. Finally, bowel injuries as a specific complication in laparoscopy are discussed (incidence up to 0.87%).

CONCLUSION

Careful selection of patients, the knowledge of typical procedure-related complications, and their best treatment are the key points for a safe laparosopic cholecystectomy.

Efeitos do pneumoperitônio com ar e CO2 na gasometria de suínos

OBJETIVO: O pneumoperitônio produz várias alterações na fisiologia humana. Algumas destas alterações, como hipercapnia e acidose, dependem ou são agravadas com o uso de CO2, tendo maior repercussão em pacientes com problema cardio-respiratório. A necessidade de uma melhor alternativa para insuflação da cavidade; a observação de que as cirurgias abertas, assim como as laparoscópicas com suspensão mecânica, são realizadas na presença de Ar ambiente; e a escassez de trabalhos testando o Ar em substituição ao CO2 para insuflação da cavidade, foram motivos para a realização deste trabalho. MÉTODOS: Vinte (0) suínos anestesiados foram submetidos a pneumoperitônio com 1 hora de duração. Os animais foram distribuídos em 4 grupos de 5 animais: Grupo A1 - Pneumoperitônio de Ar a 10 mmHg; Grupo A - Pneumoperitônio de Ar a 16 mmHg; Grupo B1 - Pneumoperitônio de CO2 a 10 mmHg; Grupo B - Pneumoperitônio de CO2 a 16 mmHg. O pneumoperitônio foi realizado pela técnica aberta com trocater de Hasson. Através de um cateter venoso central colhe-se amostra de sangue para exame de gasometria em 3 momentos. RESULTADOS: A análise da gasometria venosa não revelou alterações significativas entre os grupos em relação a PaO2 e a saturação do O2. Nos Grupos A1, A e B1 não foram observadas alterações no equilíbrio ácido-básico. No Grupo B após uma hora de pneumoperitônio houve nítida tendência a hipercapnia e acidose. CONCLUSÃO: O ar, com a técnica aberta de pneumoperitônio foi uma opção segura para insuflação de cavidade em procedimentos laparoscópicos diagnósticos de suínos.

Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

A systematic review was conducted to determine which of the methods of obtaining peritoneal access and establishing pneumoperitoneum is the safest and most effective.

METHODS

Studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified from six bibliographic databases up to May 2002, the internet, hand-searches and reference lists. They were critically appraised using a validated checklist and data were extracted using standardized protocols.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of prospective, non-randomized studies of open versus closed (needle/trocar) access indicated a trend during open access towards a reduced risk of major complications (pooled relative risk (RR(p)) 0.30, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.09 to 1.03). Open access was also associated with a trend towards a reduced risk of access-site herniation (RR(p) 0.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.04 to 1.03) and, in non-obese patients, a 57 per cent reduced risk of minor complications (RR(p) 0.43, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.92) and a trend for fewer conversions to laparotomy (RR(p) 0.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.04 to 1.17). Data on major complications in studies of direct trocar versus needle/trocar access were inconclusive. Minor complications in randomized controlled trials were fewer with direct trocar access (RR(p) 0.19, 95 per cent c.i. 0.09 to 0.40), predominantly owing to a reduction in extraperitoneal insufflation.

CONCLUSION

The evidence on the comparative safety and effectiveness of the different access methods was not definitive, but there were trends in the data that merit further exploration.

Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Hospital managers are continually trying to decrease the cost of patient care. The aim of this prospective study was to propose changes that would decrease the operating room costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without affecting clinical results.

METHODS

The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent an elective cholecystectomy between January 1997 and December 2000. The procedure was changed in eight ways: the American position, open laparoscopy, reusable trocars, reusable instruments, bipolar coagulation of the cystic artery, intracorporeal ligature of the cystic duct, no use of suction lavage apparatus, and use of a surgical glove as a bag to extract the gallbladder. Complete compliance with the procedure, whether any abnormal operative events or complications occurred, the duration of hospitalization, and the material and labour costs of the procedure were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no abnormal operative events. Only two patients suffered from postoperative complications. The mean duration of hospitalization was 55.8 h. Fifteen patients (13.4 per cent) were not hospitalized overnight. The operating costs fell from 560 euros before the study to 330 euros in 2000.

CONCLUSION

By applying simple measures, it is possible to decrease the operating room cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy whilst maintaining good results. Such measures should be applied to other laparoscopic procedures.

Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry

OBJECTIVE

To obtain consensus as to the optimal form of entry technique for access to the peritoneal cavity.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of all relevant English language studies of laparoscopic entry complications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of bowel and major vascular injuries.

RESULTS

Bowel injuries occur in 0.7/1,000 and major vascular injuries in 0.4/1,000. The overall incidence of major injuries at time of entry is 1.1/1,000. The direct entry technique is associated with a significantly reduced major injury incidence of 0.5/1,000, when compared to both open and Veress entry produces (1.1 and 0.9/1,000 respectively, p = 0.0005). Entry-related bowel injuries are reported more often following general surgical laparoscopies than with gynaecological procedures (p = 0.001). No such difference is seen in the incidence of vascular injuries (p = 0.987). Open entry is statistically more likely to be associated with bowel injury than either Veress needle or direct entry However, open entry appears to minimise vascular injury at time of entry.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains no clear evidence as to the optimal form of laparoscopic entry in the low-risk patient. However, direct entry may be an under-utilised and safe alternative to the Veress needle and open entry technique.

Experience with optical trocar in performing laparoscopic procedures

We report on the results of laparoscopic procedures in 1187 patients with use of the OPTIVIEW Optical Surgical Obturator, a device that permits visually guided trocar entry without insufflation. Most of these procedures (78%) involved hiatal hernia repairs, and 51% of our patients had a history of previous abdominal procedures. Visualization and pneumoperitoneum were successfully achieved in all patients, including those who had previously undergone multiple upper-midline abdominal procedures. There were three trocar-related injuries and one late complication (0.3%), including two bowel injuries repaired at the time of initial surgery, a mesenteric injury repaired with a clip applier, and an incisional hernia that resulted from placement of the trocar at midline instead of paramedian. Results of this large series indicate that trocar-related complications associated with use of the OPTIVIEW trocar are rare.

Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine injuries sustained during laparoscopic entry procedures that provoked malpractice claims in order to discern relative vulnerability of specific organs and differences in injury patterns, mortality, and financial awards, and specific entry devices involved in domestic claims versus those in other countries.

DESIGN

Survey (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Insurance company records.

INTERVENTIONS

Abstracts of malpractice allegations in 135 domestic cases insured by United States member companies of the Physician Insurers Association of America and 111 cases by its non-United States affiliates were examined.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Most cases in the United States involved biliary-gastrointestinal surgery rather than gynecologic procedures; this was reversed for the non-United States database. Major vessel injury was proportionally more common in the domestic group. Small bowel led the group of structures injured. Most injuries involved trocars of various types (185), including blunt types (16); and needle injuries were noted in 39 cases. Injuries were recognized more immediately in the United States, and mortality was related to delay in diagnosis of bowel penetration. Indemnity payments were greater for serious nonfatal injuries versus deaths in the United States, but the opposite was true in other countries.

CONCLUSION

Probably no needle-trocar system can guarantee avoidance of injury during laparoscopic entry, especially when the trajectory of insertion puts great vessels at risk. Bowel injuries occur during open as well as closed techniques of insertion, and with optical trocar systems as well. Vascular injury is usually obvious, but delayed recognition of loss of bowel integrity is related to increased mortality, especially in patients over 60 years of age.

Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Disposable trocars with safety shields are widely used for laparoscopic access. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors associated with injuries resulting from their use as reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

STUDY DESIGN

Manufacturers are required to report medical device-related incidents to the Food and Drug Administration. We analyzed the 629 trocar injuries reported from 1993 through 1996.

RESULTS

There were three types of injury: 408 injuries of major blood vessels, 182 other visceral injuries (mainly bowel injuries), and 30 abdominal wall hematomas. Of the 32 deaths, 26 (81%) resulted from vascular injuries and 6 (19%) resulted from bowel injuries. Eighty-seven percent of deaths from vascular injuries involved the use of disposable trocars with safety shields and 9% involved disposable trocars with a direct-viewing feature. The aorta (23%) and inferior vena cava (15%) were the vessels most commonly traumatized in the fatal vascular injuries. Ninety-one percent of bowel injuries involved trocars with safety shields and 7% involved direct-view trocars. The diagnosis of an enterotomy was delayed in 10% of cases, and the mortality rate in this group was 21%. In 41 cases (10%) the surgeon initially thought the trocar had malfunctioned, but in only 1 instance was malfunction subsequently found when the device was examined. The likelihood of injury was not related to any specific procedure or manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that safety shields and direct-view trocars cannot prevent serious injuries. Retroperitoneal vascular injuries should be largely avoidable by following safe techniques. Bowel injuries often went unrecognized, in which case they were highly lethal. Device malfunction was rarely a cause of trocar injuries.

Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries

BACKGROUND

Procedure-based surveys oflaparoscopic entry access injuries show a reassuringly low incidence, varying from 5 per 10,000 to 3 per 1,000, and, consequently, can provide only limited specific injury data. The current study uses existing injury-based reporting systems to access a uniquely large number of entry injuries to define the nature and outcomes of such events.

STUDY DESIGN

Claims arising from US and non-US entry access injuries, between 1980 and 1999, reported to the Physicians Insurers Association of America by their member and affiliate companies and entry-injury medical device reports to the US FDA, from 1995 through October 1997, were analyzed to determine operative procedures, physician specialties, entry devices, and techniques associated with specific injuries. Individual injuries were analyzed for their relative incidence and potential to cause disability and death.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-four structures or organs were injured in 506 patients, resulting in 65 deaths (13%). General surgical procedures made up at least 67% of combined medical device reports and US Physicians Insurers Association of America cases, and gynecologic procedures accounted for 63% of non-US claims. Bowel and retroperitoneal vascular injuries comprised 76% of all injuries incurred in the process of establishing a primary port. Nearly 50% of both small and large bowel injuries were unrecognized for 24 hours or longer. Delayed recognition, along with age greater than 59 years and major visceral vascular injuries, were each independent significant predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

No entry technique or device is absolutely safe. Avoidance of entry injuries depends on patient-specific anatomic orientation and control of entry axial force. Certain entry devices can be facilitating in controlling axial force. Overall, this large aggregate of entry access injuries shows them to be more serious and, along with other data, implies that they might be more common than reported in procedure-based studies.