Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy

Oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal cancer treated primarily with surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) treated primarily with surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 868 patients were included from 18 studies. Estimated pooled Overall Survival (OS) rates (95% Confidence Interval, CI) at 1 and 5 years were 74.4% (66.5-83.3), and 26.6% (20.3-34.7), respectively. Larynx non-preserving surgery (n = 229) showed an estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 5 years of 59.3% (51.5-68.2) and 14.6% (8.8-24.3), respectively. On the other hand, larynx preserving surgery (n = 213) showed an estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 5 years of 83.6% (78.2-89.4) and 35.1% (24.9-49.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary larynx-preserving surgery remains a valuable option for the management of CEC, with similar survival outcomes compared to primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT). On the other hand, larynx non-preserving surgery showed a significantly reduced survival, that may reflect the more advanced T classification of these tumors. Further studies are mandatory to directly compare primary surgery and primary CRT, distinguishing larynx preserving and non-preserving surgery.

A Nationwide Survey on Digestive Reconstruction Following Pharyngolaryngectomy With Total Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan

AIM

Digestive reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) remains challenging, with the optimal method remaining unclear. The current study aimed to clarify the short-term outcomes after PLTE and determine the optimal digestive reconstruction method.

METHODS

Based on a nationwide survey of 151 patients who underwent PLTE, outcomes of digestive reconstruction methods are described.

RESULTS

Among digestive reconstruction methods, a simple gastric tube was most frequently used (37.1%), followed by gastric tube combined with free graft transfer (FGT) (35.1%), gastric tube with microvascular anastomosis (22.5%), and other procedures (5.3%). Intraoperative evaluation of microcirculation (IOEM) was utilized in 29 patients (19.2%). Among the included patients, 66.9% developed any-grade complications, 41.0% developed severe complications, and 23.8% developed digestive reconstruction-related complications (DRRCs; leakage or necrosis). Reoperation within 30 days for any complications and DRRCs was required in 13.9% and 8.6% of the patients, respectively. Mortality within 90 days was observed in 4.6%. Among the three major methods, gastric tube combined with FGT promoted the least DRRCs in the gastric tube (P = .005), although the overall incidence of DRRCs was comparable. The use of IOEM was significantly associated with a reduction of severe DRRCs (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy is a high-risk surgery significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, the addition of FGT can help prevent gastric tip complications, while IOEM can be an effective method for improving outcomes.

Comparative outcomes of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection has become a mainstay of therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and can increase survival significantly. With the advancement of minimally invasive surgery, there is still debate on the best approach for esophagectomy. We report a modern analysis of outcomes with transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy.

METHODS

A prospectively managed esophagectomy database was queried for patients undergoing transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy between 1996 and 2016. Continuous variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis or the analysis of variance tests as appropriate. Pearson χ² test was used to compare categorical variables. All statistical tests were 2-sided and an α (type I) error < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 846 patients underwent esophagectomy with a median age of 66 (28-86) years. There was no difference in estimated blood loss for transthoracic and transhiatal, but mean operating room times were longer for transthoracic versus transhiatal (P < .001), and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher for transthoracic versus transhiatal (P < .002). Postoperative complications occurred in 207 (29%) transthoracic patients vs 59 (44.7%) transhiatal patients, (P < .001). The most common complications in transthoracic versus transhiatal techniques, respectively, were anastomotic leaks: 4.3% vs 9.8%; (P = .01), anastomotic stricture 7% vs 26.5%; (P < .001), and pneumonia 12.6% vs 22.7%; (P < .002). Median survival significantly improved in patients undergoing transthoracic (62 months) vs transhiatal (39 months) P = .03.

CONCLUSION

We found that a transthoracic approach was associated with lower pneumonias, anastomotic leaks, wound infections, and strictures, with an improvement in nodal harvest. Survival was also significantly improved in patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy.

Digestive Reconstruction After Pharyngolaryngectomy with Total Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) is often indicated for patients with synchronous head and neck cancer and thoracic esophageal cancer or those with head and neck cancer extending to the upper mediastinum. A long conduit is required for the reconstruction, and the blood flow at the tip of the conduit is not always sufficient. Thus, reconstructive surgery after PLTE remains challenging, and optimal reconstruction methods have not been elucidated to date.

METHODS

This analysis investigated 65 patients who underwent PLTE. The short-term outcomes among the procedures were compared to explore the optimal digestive reconstruction methods.

RESULTS

We used a simple gastric conduit for 7 patients, a gastric conduit with microvascular anastomosis (MVA) for 10 patients, an elongated gastric conduit with an MVA for 20 patients, a gastric conduit combined with a free jejunum transfer (FJT) for 25 patients, and other procedures for 3 patients. Postoperatively, 17 (26.2%) of the patients experienced severe complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3b or higher, including graft failure for 3 patients (6.2%). Anastomotic leakage was found in six patients (9.2%), and all leakages occurred at the pharyngogastric anastomosis. The reoperation rate was 15.4% (n = 10), and three patients (4.6%) died of massive bleeding from major vessels. The patients who underwent simple gastric conduit more frequently had graft failure (P = 0.04), anastomotic leakage (P < 0.01), and reoperation (P = 0.04) than the patients treated with the other reconstructive methods.

CONCLUSION

Additional procedures such as MVA, gastric tube elongation, and FJT contribute to improving the outcomes of reconstruction after PLTE.

Esophagectomy from then to now

We have come a long way from the onset of surgery for esophageal cancer. Surgical resection is pivotal for the long-term survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Moreover, advancements in post-operative care and surgical techniques have contributed to reductions in morbidity. More recently minimally invasive esophagectomy has been increasingly used in patients undergoing esophageal cancer resection. Potential advantages of MIE include: the decreased pulmonary complications, lower post-operative wound infection, decreased post-operative pain, and decreased length of hospitalization. The application of robotics to esophageal surgery is becoming more widespread. Robotic esophageal surgery has potential advantages over the known limitations of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches to esophagectomy while adhering to the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. This paper is a review of the evolution from open esophagectomy to the most recent robotic approach.

Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: technique and early outcomes

Esophagectomy is pivotal for the long-term survival in patients with early stage and advanced esophageal cancer, and improved perioperative care and advanced surgical techniques have contributed to reduced postoperative morbidity. However, despite these advances, esophagectomy continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophageal surgery (MIE) has been increasingly used in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Potential advantages of MIE include the decreased postoperative pain; lower postoperative wound infection, decreased pulmonary complications, and decreased length of hospitalization. Robotic esophageal surgery has the ability to overcome some of the limitations of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches to esophagectomy while maintaining the benefits of the minimally invasive approach. In this article, we will review the clinical efficacy and outcomes associated with robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (RAIL).

Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of cervical oesophageal cancer

Cervical oesophageal cancer (CEC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy. The biological behaviour and treatment have not been well studied. This retrospective study reviewed the clinicopathological features of 28 patients with CEC who underwent surgical resection to investigate the biological behaviour, treatment and prognosis of CEC. The long-term outcomes of these patients were compared with those of the CEC patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy and those of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery. The study group contained 21 men and 7 women, ranging in age from 41 to 67 years (median: 56.5 years). The median survival time and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 25.0 months, 83.8%, 48.8%, and 41.9%, respectively. Only salvage surgery was found to affect the overall survival (P = 0.007). The long-term outcomes for CEC patients who underwent surgery were significantly better than those who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.045) but were similar to those of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer patients. In summary, CEC is an uncommon and aggressive malignancy. The malignant potential of CEC is similar to that of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer. Surgical resection is an important therapeutic strategy and may be associated with better survival rates than definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Reconstruction of upper digestive tract: Reducing morbidity by laparoscopic pull-up

BACKGROUND: Gastric pull-up is a useful method for reconstruction of the upper digestive tract, with considerable morbidity/mortality, especially in esophageal cancers (EC)

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the experience of a multidisciplinary team with a laparoscopic gastric pull-up (LGPU) method, with or without thoracoscopy, in a series of 120 patients with EC.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2004, 120 EC [cervical/cervicothoracic (3.0%), middle third (15.0%), and inferior third (82.0%)]. Most were squamous cell carcinomas (47.0%) and adenocarcinomas (34.0%). Stomach was dissected and mobilized exclusively by laparoscopy. Occasionally, laparoscopic approach was extended cranially, until connecting with cervical dissection. In other cases, dissection of thoracic esophagus was accomplished through a thoracoscopic approach.

RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (68.0%) had LGPU; 39 (32.0%) needed thoracoscopy. Mortality was 5.9%. Complications were fistula (10.0%) and pneumonia (10.0%). All fistulae closed spontaneously; 89.2% of patients could swallow a normal oral diet.

CONCLUSION: Low morbidity/mortality of LGPU for EC compared favorably with conventional techniques.

Thoracoscopic versus robotic approaches: advantages and disadvantages

The overall advantages of thoracoscopy over thoracotomy in terms of patient recovery have been fairly well established. The use of robotics, however, is a newer and less proven modality in the realm of thoracic surgery. Robotics offers distinct advantages and disadvantages in comparison with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Robotic technology is now used for a variety of complex cardiac, urologic, and gynecologic procedures including mitral valve repair and microsurgical treatment of male infertility. This article addresses the potential benefits and limitations of using the robotic platform for the performance of a variety of thoracic operations.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview

Since its introduction in the People's Republic of China in 1992, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has shown the classical advantages of minimally invasive surgery over its open counterpart. Like all pioneers of the technique, cardiothoracic surgeons in the People's Republic of China claim that MIE has a lower risk of pulmonary infection, faster recovery, a shorter hospital stay, and a more rapid return to daily activities than open esophagectomy, while offering the same functional and oncologic results. There has been burgeoning interest in MIE in the People's Republic of China since 1995. The last decade has witnessed nationwide growth in the application of MIE and yielded a significant amount of scientific data in support of its clinical merits and advantages. However, no prospective randomized controlled trials have actually investigated the benefits of MIE in the People's Republic of China. Here we review the current data and state of the art MIE treatment for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China.

Laparoscopic gastric mobilization in postcricoid cancer surgery

AIM

Postcricoid cancer is an aggressive neoplasm that presents specific therapeutic problems. This study compares laparoscopic stomach mobilization following total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (TPLE) with open mobilization following TPLE with respect to postoperative recovery, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study in a contemporary series of patients with resectable postcricoid cancer from a single institute (Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, M.P. Shah Cancer Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India). Twenty-five consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic TPLE were compared with 40 patients who underwent open TPLE from January 2006 to December 2010.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic and open TPLE procedures were compared with respect to patient demographics, operative information (blood loss, duration), and complications. The mean duration of surgery was 3.5 hours in the laparoscopic group and 5.5 hours in the open group. The respective mean blood loss was 290 mL and 460 mL. The respective mean time to full oral intake was 10 days and 11 days. The respective average duration of hospitalization was 13 days and 17 days. In the laparoscopic group, 3 (12%) and 4 (16%) patients had pneumonic consolidation and wound infection, respectively, compared with 8 (20%) and 8 (20%) patients in the open group. In the laparoscopic group, there were two (8%) perioperative deaths, compared with four (10%) in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic TPLE is safe with less morbidity and mortality and quicker postoperative recovery compared with open surgery.

Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

INTRODUCTION

Surgical resection remains the mainstay treatment for patients with localized esophageal cancer. It is, however, a complex procedure. Mortality rate used to be high, but in recent years, death rate has been reduced to below 5% in specialized centers.

METHODS

Outcome of esophagectomy can be improved by paying attention to (1) appropriate patient section, (2) choice of surgical techniques and their execution, and (3) optimizing perioperative care. A volume-outcome relationship is also evident. Surgeons can perform esophagectomy without mortality, but a multi-disciplinary team management is essential to achieve this goal.

Management of oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is a disease of dismal prognosis. There are variations of epidemiology among different ethnic groups and geographic regions. India is a country with high incidence. This can be attributed to the interplay between environmental, dietary factors and life-style of the population of the country. Optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with oesophageal cancer demands individual consideration.Majority of oesophageal cancer patients present at an advanced stage of disease. Screening programmes or strategies aiming at early diagnosis can improve the prognosis; unfortunately this is not cost-effective except in very high incidence areas. Accurate staging can help select the most appropriate treatments, such as excluding those patients with metastatic disease who are unlikely to benefit from surgery, and treating very early lesions with endoscopic means. When surgery is indicated, treating patient in a high-volume centre can improve the outcome and minimise complications. Although surgical resection remains the main treatment modality, long-term prognosis after surgical resection alone has been suboptimal except in those with early disease. Multidisciplinary approaches including chemotherapy and radiotherapy with or without surgery are increasingly employed for patients with advanced disease. Collaboration among surgeons, clinical oncologists, radiologists and physicians is of utmost importance to achieve the best results. Treatment for patients should be individualised to enhance outcome.

The current management of esophageal cancer

The divergence in epidemiology between the East and West has made interpretation of data in the literature more difficult and has affected the choice of the most appropriate surgical technique and treatment strategies. The management of esophageal cancer certainly has evolved, and many more options are available. Stage-directed strategies and individualization of treatment are important considerations. Surgeons play a central role in directing management of this disease by advising how best to integrate surgical therapy with nonoperative programs. Surgeons should aim at improving their results further, so that the best results of surgery are compared with seemingly "safer" nonsurgical therapies. Low death rates have been achieved in specialized centers, but there still is much room for improvement in morbidity rates. Even with the best surgical resection and chemoradiation therapy, distant failure remains a barrier to improved survival rates. Therapeutic improvements will require more effective systemic drugs and a better ability to predict responders with precision. Management strategies will evolve further, with improvements in molecular techniques, imaging methods, and introduction of more novel tumoricidal agents. The challenge for the future is to test strategies critically in a scientific, unbiased manner and to explore other innovative treatments.

Lymph node dissection in surgical treatment of esophageal neoplasms

The optimal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer remains controversial. The choice of surgical access determines to a great extent the type of lymphadenectomy possible. En bloc resections and three-field lymphadenectomy are concepts pioneered in the West and East, respectively; both should be performed in specialized centers because such extended lymph node dissection has substantial morbidity rates. Recent focus in research is on refining the indications for these procedures. Patient management strategies should be individualized.

Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using the thoracoscopic approach

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy allows dissection under direct vision, and therefore it potentially results in fewer complications than conventional transhiatal mobilization. In this article we report our experience with this approach. It was also hypothesized that a learning curve existed and that results have improved over time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From July 1994 until January 2004, 57 patients underwent pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy in our institution. Intraoperative events and postoperative outcome were prospectively documented, and long-term follow-up data were also studied. Results were compared between the first 30 patients and the last 27 patients.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the various clinicopathological characteristics. There was no difference in the median thoracoscopic time between the first 30 and last 27 patients at 90 and 75 min, respectively, p = 0.18. For the complete procedure there was significantly less blood loss in the later group; median (range) blood loss 700 (164-3000) ml versus 400 (100-1200) ml, p = 0.002. Overall pulmonary complications occurred in 12 patients (40%) in the first group versus 13 (48%) in the second group, p = 0.6. The incidence of atrial arrhythmia was also similar, affecting 6 (20%) patients and 3 (11%), respectively, p = 0.47. Hospital mortality rates were 13.3% and 7.4%, p = 0.67. Two-year survival rates were no different (46% versus 45% p = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Although, subjectively, operating skills have improved over time, better results in the second half of this series could not be demonstrated clearly, likely because the operating surgeons had prior extensive experience in esophageal and thoracoscopic procedures.

Incidence and Types of Arrhythmias After Mediastinal Manipulation During Transhiatal Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is a common operative procedure for carcinoma esophagus. Complications of this procedure include arrhythmias and hypotension during blunt dissection of the esophagus from posterior mediastinum. In the literature, exact incidence and type of arrhythmias have not been reported. We employed Holter monitoring during mediastinal manipulation in patients undergoing THE, for this purpose.

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out in 20 consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II patients undergoing THE. Anesthetic technique included induction with thiopentone and maintenance with morphine, vecuronium, and isoflurane. In addition to routine parameters, Holter monitoring was undertaken to record the exact incidence and types of arrhythmias. "Premanipulation" or control period included duration of 30 minutes preceding mediastinal manipulation, while "during manipulation" or study period included the duration of mediastinal manipulation. The incidence of arrhythmias was studied for 48 hours in the postoperative period. The Fisher exact test was applied to analyze incidence of arrhythmias and hypotension.

RESULTS

Out of 20 patients, only 2 had arrhythmias in the premanipulation period, while 13 had arrhythmias during the manipulation period (p < 0.01). During the manipulation period, arrhythmias included supraventricular ectopics and ventricular ectopics in 2 patients each and a combination of both in 9 patients. Arrhythmias were transient and had no correlation with either duration or degree of hypotension in all the patients. However, there was a linear relationship between hypotension and duration of mediastinal manipulation. Two patients (10%) had atrial arrhythmias in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

In transhiatal esophagectomy, there is a significant incidence of both arrhythmias and hypotension during mediastinal manipulation. The incidence of arrhythmias can be minimized by limiting the duration of the manipulation. The incidence of postoperative arrhythmias was not significant.

The Influence of Technical Complications on Postoperative Outcome and Survival After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The dismal survival associated with esophagectomy for cancer has led to the search for potentially correctable factors responsible for this poor prognosis. Although it is intuitive that technical complications could increase postoperative mortality, the effect on long-term survival is controversial.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2002, 434 patients underwent resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus. Prospectively collected data were reviewed for the presence of technical complications. Patient, tumor, and operative variables, postoperative outcome, and survival were compared between patients with technical complications and those without. Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Technical complications occurred in 98 (22.6%) patients. Patients with technical complications had a higher prevalence of cardiac disease, more proximal tumors, and more cervical anastomoses. Technical complications were associated with an increased rate of pulmonary complications (37.8% vs. 10.7%; P<.001) and increased hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 3.3%; P=.025), but no difference in 30-day mortality (2% vs. 1.2%; P=.6). Poor-prognostic factors for survival included male sex, stage III/IV disease, cirrhosis, proximal tumors, and R1/R2 resection, but not technical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although immediate postoperative outcome and hospital mortality rates were increased, no effect on long-term survival was seen in patients with complications related to errors in surgical technique.

Minimally invasive techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery

Innovative minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been explored for the purpose of oesophagectomy since the early 1990s, including various combinations of thoracoscopy, laparoscopy or laparoscopic-assisted methods, mediastinoscopy and open thoracotomy and laparotomy. The myriad of surgical approaches implies a lack of consensus on which is superior. Like open surgery, it is perhaps more important to have a tailored approach for the individual patient. MIS oesophagectomy has been shown to be feasible, and at least equivalent postoperative morbidity and mortality rates to open surgical resection have been demonstrated. Selected series have achieved less blood loss, reduction in some postoperative complications, decrease in intensive care and hospital stay, and better preservation of pulmonary function. Clear proof of superiority over conventional oesophagectomy methods however is not forthcoming since comparisons were often made with unmatched patient cohorts, and a well conducted randomized controlled trial has not been carried out. It is expected that with further improvements in instrumentation and experience, these difficult procedures may become more accessible and widely practised.

Minimally invasive pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy: a salvage procedure for recurrent postcricoid esophageal cancer

Hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal tumors represent 5-10% of all esophageal neoplasms and are challenging for both surgeons and oncologists, because the choice of the adequate therapeutic strategy is not clearly defined and therefore difficult. In fact, although surgical treatment represents the gold standard of therapy, chemo-radiotherapy, previously used as adjuvant treatment, has been more recently adopted with curative intent, leaving to surgery a salvage role only. When surgery is required it is advisable to reduce patients' trauma. The present study reports on a personal technique for minimally invasive pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy and reconstruction with the whole stomach. We use a laparoscopic approach for mobilization of the stomach, transhiatal esophageal dissection and to follow transhiatal gastric transposition to the neck combined to a cervicotomy to perform pharyngo-laryngectomy, proximal esophageal mobilization, and pharyngo-gastric anastomosis. We performed this technique on four patients with recurrent disease after initially curative primary chemo-radiotherapy. Mean operative time was 345 min (range: 300-384). There were no intraoperative complications. All patients were extubated immediately after the operation and were managed in postoperative care unit for a mean time of 10 days (range: 7-12). Enteral nutrition was begun on post-operative day (POD) 1. The nasogastric tube and drainages were removed on POD 11, and patients immediately started oral nutrition. One patient had a TIA (transient ischemic attack) on POD 2. All patients were discharged within 20 days (18-20). Initial experience with this minimally invasive technique in selected patients is encouraging because it seems to minimize postoperative complications and allows early rehabilitation.

Cirugía laparoscópica en el cáncer de esófago

INTRODUCTION

For the last year we have substituted laparotomy with laparoscopy for the abdominal stage of esophageal cancer surgery. We report our experience of the introduction of video-assisted surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We report our experience of nine patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. In seven patients laparoscopy was preceded by right thoracotomy and esophageal dissection. Then, a left anterolateral cervicotomy was performed to remove the specimen and to construct the esophagogastroanastomosis. In two patients the laparoscopic technique was performed first and the Ivor Lewis procedure was completed by right thoracotomy.

RESULTS

Due to the reduced number of operated patients, the results are of little significance. Morbidity was 38.3%. The mean duration of the surgical procedure in laparoscopic patients was 4 h 50 min. However, perioperative blood loss, postoperative complications, analgesic requirements and mean length of hospital stay were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-assisted esophagectomy can be performed as safely as conventional esophagectomy and has considerable perioperative advantages. The introduction of the laparoscopic procedure is the first step in using video-assisted surgery at all stages of esophageal cancer surgery.

Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at: (1) documenting the evolution of surgical results of esophagectomy in a high-volume center, (2) identifying predictive factors of pulmonary complications and mortality, and (3) examining whether preoperative chemoradiation therapy would complicate postoperative recovery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pulmonary complications and mortality rate after esophagectomy remain substantial, and factors responsible have not been adequately studied. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is widely used; it is hypothesized that this may lead to adverse postoperative outcome.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were used to analyze outcome in 421 patients with intrathoracic squamous cell esophageal cancer who underwent resection. Logistic regression analyses determined independent predictors of pulmonary complications and death. Two time periods were compared: period I (January 1990 to June 1995) and period II (July 1995 to December 2001). In the later period, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was introduced.

RESULTS

Transthoracic resections were carried out in 83% of patients. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was given to 42% of patients in period II. Major pulmonary complications occurred in 15.9%, and were primarily responsible for 55% of hospital deaths. Thirty-day and hospital mortality rates were 1.4% and 4.8%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified age, operation duration, and proximal tumor location as risk factors for pulmonary complications, whereas advanced age and higher blood loss were predictive of mortality. Chemoradiation did not lead to worse outcome. When period I and II were compared, hospital mortality rate reduced from 7.8% to 1.1%, P = 0.001, with correspondingly less blood loss (median blood loss was 700 ml (range: 200-2700 (period I) and 450 ml (range: 100-7000) (period II), P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A 1.1% mortality rate was achieved in the last 6 years of the study period. Preoperative chemoradiation did not result in worse outcome. Reduction in mortality rate correlated with decreased blood loss.

Therapeutic options for esophageal cancer

Options for the treatment of esophageal cancer used to be very limited, with surgical resection and radiotherapy methods aimed at both cure or palliation, and, in those unfortunate patients with severe dysphagia, intubation with a plastic prosthesis to restore esophageal luminal patency. Progress in the management of this cancer in the past two decades includes refinement in surgical techniques and perioperative care, better radiological staging methods, enhanced means of planning and delivering radiotherapy, multimodality treatments, and better designs in esophageal prosthesis. For individual patients, a stage-directed therapeutic plan can be used. Long-term survival, however, remains suboptimal for this deadly disease. The current review presents an overview of the commonly employed therapeutic options for esophageal cancer at the beginning of the 21st century.

Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostic factors and reasons for improved survival over time in patients with esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Management strategies for esophageal cancer have evolved with time. The impact of chemoradiation in the overall treatment results has not been adequately studied.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2000, 399 (62.4%) of 639 patients with intrathoracic squamous cancers underwent resection. Two study periods were analyzed: period I (01/1990-06/1995), and period II (07/1995-12/2000); during period II, chemoradiation was introduced. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis and the 2 periods compared.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality rate after resection decreased from 7.8% to 1.2%, P = 0.002. Five favorable prognostic factors were identified: female gender (female vs. male, HR = 0.66), infracarinal tumor location (infra vs. supra-carinal, HR = 0.63), low pTNM stage (III/IV vs. 0/I/II/T0N1, HR = 1.76), pM0 stage (M1a/b vs. M0, HR = 1.56), and R0 category (R1/2 vs. R0, HR = 2.49). Median survival was 15.8 and 25.6 months in periods I and II, respectively, P = 0.02. More R0 resections were evident in period II, being possible in 63% (period I) and 79% (period II) of patients, P = 0.001. This was attributed to tumor downstaging by chemoradiation and more stringent patient selection for resection in period II. Performing less R1/2 resections in period II coincided with using primary chemoradiation in treating advanced tumors. In patients treated without resection, survival also improved from 3 (period I) to 5.8 months (period II), P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival has improved; chemoradiation enabled better patient selection for curative resections and also resulted in more R0 resections by tumor downstaging. This treatment strategy led to overall better outcome for the whole patient cohort, even in those treated by nonsurgical means.

Use of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus

Minimally invasive surgery has had a great effect on all branches of surgery, although its use for oesophageal cancer is controversial because of the technical complexity of the techniques involved and its uncertain benefits. We review the minimally invasive techniques that have been used for oesophagectomy. The methods are certainly feasible and can be done safely in experienced centres, but postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are not substantially reduced by the procedure. There are also concerns regarding the adequacy of tumour clearance. Further evaluation of the role of minimally invasive techniques in oesophageal cancer would require larger scale studies, preferably randomised controlled trials, in experienced centres. However, given that survival rates have not changed, proving that minimally invasive techniques are more effective than conventional methods of oesophagectomy, will be a difficult task.

Changing disease burden and management issues for esophageal cancer in the Asia-Pacific region

The changing epidemiology of esophageal cancer in developed countries is from squamous cell type to adenocarcinomas arising from Barrett's epithelium and the gastric cardia. This has implications for management of this disease. Earlier diagnosis of cancer from screening high-risk patients with Barrett's esophagus is potentially possible, and mucosal ablation together with acid-suppressive therapies have been investigated to revert Barrett's epithelium in its premalignant stage. When a cancer has developed, the strategies of staging methodology and surgical approaches also differ from those applicable for squamous cell cancers located in more proximal locations of the esophagus. By contrast, in the Asia-Pacific region (with the exceptions of Australia and New Zealand), squamous cell cancers in the middle portion of the esophagus remain the main cell type seen. An overall increase in life expectancy has led to more elderly patients presenting with carcinoma of the esophagus. This is of particular importance when surgical resection is contemplated. Advances in surgical management, multimodality programs, and endoscopic therapies are most marked in recent years. Treatment for patients with esophageal cancer should be individualized. The choice depends on expertise and facilities available, tumor and patient factors, and local economics.

Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Over the last year, several interesting studies have been published on the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Surprisingly, none of them was a randomized phase III trial. The debate on the necessary extent of a potentially curative surgical resection is ongoing. After initially disappointing results, the innovative technique of minimally invasive surgery draws new attention, but clear advantages for the endoscopic approach are yet to emerge. An updated meta-analysis on the value of preoperative radiotherapy showed negative results. There is a clear tendency toward combined-modality treatment, especially in patients with more advanced disease. Some new chemotherapeutic agents showed promising preliminary results (especially paclitaxel), whereas others were clearly disappointing (eg, gemcitabine, topotecan). Concurrent chemoradiation as primary treatment for proximal (cervical) tumors was remarkably effective.