Myocardial revascularization with multiple arterial grafts: comparison between the radial artery and the right internal thoracic artery

Effect of right internal mammary artery versus radial artery as a second graft vessel in coronary artery bypass grafting on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis

Few studies have shown that radial artery (RA), which is used as a secondary arterial graft, offers superior results compared with right internal thoracic artery (RIMA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In a meta-analysis of observational studies starting in 2023, we looked at the effect of re-operation on postoperative infection and haemorrhage in CABG with RA vs. RIMA. The electronic database up to October 2023 was examined in the course of the research. Analysis was carried out on the clinical trials of postoperative wound infections and haemorrhage re-surgery. Among 912 trials associated with CABG, we selected 8 trials to be included in the final data analysis. The main results were secondary wound infection and re-operation after surgery. The odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were computed on the basis of a randomized or fixed-effect model of wound infection and re-operation. Seven trials showed a significant reduction in the risk of wound infection in RA treated as a secondary artery transplant compared with RIMA (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.47 p = 0.04); Four trials showed that RIMA was not significantly different from RA in the rate of re-operation for postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.60, 2.88 p = 0.50). In CABG, RA is used as a secondary arterial conduit graft to lower the risk of wound infection in CABG patients.

Right internal thoracic artery versus radial artery as the second best arterial conduit: Insights from a meta-analysis of propensity-matched data on long-term survival

OBJECTIVE(S)

We conducted a meta-analysis of propensity score-matching (PSM) studies comparing long-term survival of patients receiving right internal thoracic artery (RITA) versus radial artery (RA) as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles. Primary endpoint was long-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were operative mortality, incidence of sternal wound infection, and repeat revascularization. Binary events were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird method. For time-to-event outcomes, estimates of log hazard ratio (HR) and standard errors obtained were combined using the generic inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

A total of 8 PSM studies were finally selected including 15,374 patients (RITA, 6739; RA, 8635) with 2992 matched pairs for final comparison. Mean follow-up time ranged from 45 to 168 months. When compared with RA, RITA was associated with a lower risk reduction of late death (HR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.97; P = .028) and repeat revascularization (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.85; P = .03). On the other hand, RITA did not increase operative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% CI, 0.97-2.39; P = .07). RITA was associated with an increased risk of sternal wound complication when pedicled harvesting was used (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.34-7.57), but not with skeletonized harvesting (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.67-1.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The present PSM data meta-analysis suggests that the use of RITA compared with RA was associated with superior long-term survival and freedom from repeat revascularization, with similar operative mortality and incidence of sternal wound complication when the skeletonized harvesting technique was used.

The radial artery: a forgotten conduit

We reviewed the published literature on the clinical and angiographic outcome of radial artery (RA) grafts and on the comparison between the RA and the other conduits used in coronary operations. The RA is a better graft than the saphenous vein and comparable to the right internal thoracic artery (RITA); moreover, the RA seems a better choice than the RITA in patients at risk of sternal or pulmonary complications. We conclude that the RA should be preferred to the saphenous vein and considered at least equivalent to the RITA as the second conduit during every elective coronary artery bypass procedure.

Radial artery as graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: Advantages and disadvantages for its usage focused on structural and biological characteristics

Radial artery (RA) is the most popular arterial graft after the left internal thoracic artery in both low- and high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Various arterial grafts such as the right internal thoracic artery, the right gastroepiploic artery, and the inferior epigastric artery have also gained ground over the past 30 years because of the intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis of the saphenous vein leading to late graft occlusion. In this review article we would like to present the utility of the RA as a graft, focused mainly on its structural and biological characteristics.

Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is increasingly being carried out on patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but the best grafting candidate for non-left anterior descending coronary arteries is unclear. This research sought to systematically compare the efficacies and safeties of coronary bypass with radial artery and other available grafts. A systematic literature retrieval was performed for all clinical trials comparing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery with radial artery and other grafts in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Seven eligible clinical studies, comparing radial artery and great saphenous vein grafts, were found between 1966 and 2010: one prospective non-randomized and six prospective randomized trials. The pooling analysis obtained a relative risk of 0.507 (P<0.05) of graft occlusion in radial arteries compared with great saphenous veins. There was a significantly lower infection rate in arms (i.e., harvest sites for radial arteries) relative to legs (harvest sites for veins), with a pooled relative risk of 0.140 (P<0.05). From the reports on mortality after follow-up ranging from one year to six years, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two graft types (P=0.927). In addition, four cohort controlled trials for radial and right internal thoracic artery grafts were included. The radial graft was associated with less cardiac related events relative to the right internal thoracic artery graft (P=0.014), but with comparable mortality and comparable rates of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Subjects with radial arteries seemed to have a lower occlusion rate and a lower graft harvest site infection rate than those with great saphenous veins. Moreover there were fewer cardiac related events with radial arteries relative to the right internal thoracic artery grafts. More studies are needed to confirm these findings concerning the favorable outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with radial arteries on long-term patency and mortality.

Harvesting radial artery and neurologic complications

BACKGROUND

Determination of the incidence, mechanisms, and diagnosis of hand complications after radial artery (RA) harvesting in coronary surgery (CABG).

METHODS

The study group (RA group) includes 54 patients who underwent RA harvesting in CABG operation. The control group (noRA group) consists of 131 patients who underwent CABG without the use of RA graft. The average follow-up time was 16.36 +/- 5.13 months. The patients were examined clinically, (a) for motor function abnormalities associated with radial and median nerve damage and (b) for sensory abnormalities, and the function of radial nerve was determined by eliciting the brachioradialis reflex. They answered in a formal scripted questionnaire to elicit symptoms and clinical points attributable to nerve damage during RA harvest, such as hand weakness, thumb weakness, sensation abnormalities on the back and on the palm side of the forearm, hand numbness, hand-reversible paresis or forearm infection postoperatively, and any other upper limb abnormality.

RESULTS

Of the patients in the RA group, 34.09% reported left-hand abnormality after operation. On the other hand, in the noRA group left-hand abnormality was reported in 18.68% of patients. In the RA group sensation abnormality was reported in 34.09% of patients and thumb weakness alone was reported in 6.82% of patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Low EuroSCORE was the predicting factor for motor abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

More knowledge has been added about the neurologic complications after RA harvesting lately. We demonstrated the rate of motor and sensory abnormality, the potential mechanisms of these complications caused by surgical trauma or devascularization, and any predictive factors of complications. Optimal surgical techniques to avoid the damage of the responsible nerves are recommended.

Predictive Factors of Hemodynamic Collapse After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Sudden hemodynamic collapse after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a complication with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to explore factors possibly predictive of this major complication.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

University hospital, department of cardiothoracic surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Between 1988 and 1999, of 8,807 CABG patients, a total of 76 (0.9%) suffered hemodynamic collapse after CABG surgery unrelated to pericardial tamponade or bleeding. Preoperatively matched patients (by age, sex, New York Heart Association classification, number of diseased vessels, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes) served as a control group (n = 76).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with sudden cardiovascular collapse underwent emergency reopening of the sternotomy and open cardiac massage (OCM group). Several pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were compared, and significant parameters in match-pair analysis were further tested with regression techniques.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 76 OCMs, 57 (75%) occurred during the first 5 postoperative hours. In-hospital mortality was 46% (35 of 76) versus 0% in controls; 5-year survival was 49% versus 95%. In the OCM group, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was significantly prolonged (p = 0.0024), and cardiac index (p = 0.05) and the first acid-base values after CPB were lower (pH, p = 0.0057; BE, p = 0.0014). Postoperative myocardial ischemia appeared in 33% of patients in the OCM group and in 8% of controls (p < 0.0001). OCM-group patients more frequently required postoperative inotropic (epinephrine, p = 0.0002) and mechanical support (intra-aortic balloon pump, p = 0.005). Regression analysis revealed a correlation between cardiopulmonary resuscitation risk and low cardiac index, postoperative ischemia, and low pH level.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate tissue perfusion, postoperative myocardial ischemia, and increased need for inotropic and mechanical support preceded hemodynamic collapse. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and to prevent and treat myocardial ischemia may result in a more favorable outcome.

Radial artery as an autologous cell source for valvular tissue engineering efforts

To create a viable tissue-engineered aortic valve, it is important to identify suitable autologous cell sources that may be seeded onto a biocompatible scaffold. This study focused on the radial artery (RA) as one possible source, investigated optimal culture conditions, and determined the usefulness of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as a scaffold for tissue-engineering. Porcine RA cells were cultured on either two-dimensional (2D) 100-mm dishes or three-dimensional (3D) 1-cm(2) SIS sheets, producing cell-scaffold composites (CSCs). Both 2D and 3D cultures were maintained in either Medium 199 (M199) or endothelial growth media (EGM) to determine optimal growth conditions. Cellular phenotype and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) profiles were determined by immunoblotting of cell lysates and zymography of conditioned media, respectively. Cellular invasion was analyzed immunohistochemically on CSC tissue sections. We show that the RA contains phenotypes consistent with those found in the normal aortic valve. EGM, compared with M199, promotes the invasion and remodeling of SIS by RA cells, which is crucial in the process of replacing the foreign tissue scaffold prior to implantation. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that the RA is a suitable source for the generation of a tissue-engineered valve.

Radial Artery Graft for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Biological Characteristics and Clinical Outcome

The radial artery (RA) is gaining popularity as a bypass conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and its impact on clinical practice has been extensively explored. In the present article, we provide a review of postoperative hand circulation, vascular biological characteristics of the RA graft, the efficacy of vasodilator therapies, and mid-term clinical results of use of the RA graft. Fundamental studies revealed excellent vascular biological characteristics of the RA graft as a living arterial conduit, making it almost equivalent to the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft. Clinical studies have yielded encouraging mid-term results. Most studies reported in favor of the RA graft over the saphenous vein graft with regard to patency rate, freedom from cardiac events, and survival. However, superiority of either the RA or right ITA graft has not been conclusively determined. The long-term results of RA grafts remain unknown, but at present, supplementary use of an RA graft with a left ITA graft appears feasible for CABG.

Total Arterial Myocardial Revascularization Using Composite and Sequential Grafting With the Off-Pump Technique

BACKGROUND

Multiple arterial myocardial revascularizations are increasingly undertaken using off-pump techniques; however, various arterial grafting techniques are utilized. This study aimed to review the outcome of combining arterial composite and sequential grafting with off-pump techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery with off-pump and arterial composite grafting techniques between April 2001 and March 2004. The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was harvested in all patients, and the right internal thoracic artery (RITA), the radial artery (RA), and the gastroepiploic artery (GEA) were harvested in 69 patients, in 83 patients, and in 53 patients, respectively. Early postoperative angiograms were evaluated in 97 patients.

RESULTS

There were 488 distal anastomoses, an average of 4.5 per patient. Forty-four in situ LITAs were used as LITA Y-composite grafts with a free RITA (n = 19), RA (n = 24), or free GEA (n = 1). Forty-three in situ RITAs were used as RITA-RA grafts (n = 42) or a RITA-GEA graft (n = 1). Twenty-one in situ GEAs were used as composite grafts with the RA (n = 17) or a free RITA (n = 4). There were no hospital deaths. The patency of the LITA was 100%, and that of the RA was 97.3%, while patencies of both in situ and free RITA and GEA were 100%. During the follow-up period (mean: 22.1 months), there were 3 late deaths, but none were cardiac related.

CONCLUSIONS

Total arterial revascularization with composite and sequential grafting is a safe and effective technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Improved Survival With Radial Artery Versus Vein Conduits in Coronary Bypass Surgery With Left Internal Thoracic Artery to Left Anterior Descending Artery Grafting

Background— Given its proven survival benefit, left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending (LITA-LAD) grafting has become a fundamental part of CABG. This grafting also led to increased use of other arterial conduits, of which the radial artery is most popular. Whether radial grafting improves survival beyond that achieved by LITA-LAD alone is not known.

Methods and Results— We compared 6-year outcomes in propensity-matched CABG-LITA-LAD patients (925 each) divided into those with ≥1 radial grafts and those with vein-only grafting. Matched patients had essentially identical demographics, comorbidities, coronary disease, and operative data. Perioperative outcomes, including death (radial, 11 [1.2%]; vein, 10 [1.1%]), were similar for the 2 groups. Cumulative 0- to 6-year survival was better for radial patients (risk ratio, 0.675), particularly after 3 years ( P <0.03). Six-year survival in vein (86.8%) and radial (92.1%) patients indicated 67% greater overall vein mortality. Incidence rates of radial and vein repeated catheterization (190 of 925 [20.5%] versus 199 of 925 [21.5%]) and revascularization (8.8% versus 8.5%) were similar. Angiography data in restudied symptomatic patients showed a trend for greater radial patency. Vein failure (66 of 161 [41%]) was significantly worse than radial failure (46 of 157 [29.3%]) in patients receiving both types of grafts ( P =0.039).

Conclusions— Using radial as a second arterial conduit in CABG-LITA-LAD as opposed to vein grafting improves long-term outcomes as a result of decreased late deaths, especially after the third postoperative year.

Radial versus right internal thoracic artery as a second arterial conduit for coronary surgery: early and midterm outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare early and midterm clinical outcomes in patients receiving a right internal thoracic artery or a radial artery as the second arterial conduit for myocardial revascularization.

METHODS

Data prospectively collected for all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery between April 1996 and May 2001 and who received both a left internal thoracic artery graft and either a right internal thoracic artery (n = 336) or a radial artery graft (n = 325) were analyzed. Patients in the radial artery group were older, with a greater body mass index, poorer ejection fraction, greater prevalence of diabetes, and higher New York Heart Association class than those in the right internal thoracic artery group.

RESULTS

Odds ratios for perioperative myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, postoperative transfusion, and intensive care unit stay all showed a statistically significant benefit in the radial artery group compared with results in the right internal thoracic artery group (P <or=.05). Survival estimates at 18 months for patients who received right internal thoracic artery and radial artery grafts were 98.4% and 99.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-1.10; P =.07). Estimates for survival free from any cardiac-related event or death in the right internal thoracic artery and radial artery groups were 92.3% and 97.8%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.84; P =.02). A multivariate Cox regression model showed a stronger protective effect of a radial artery graft (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.51; P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

Early and midterm outcomes of myocardial revascularization with 2 arterial grafts are better if the radial artery is used for the second graft rather than the right internal thoracic artery, assuming that the left internal thoracic artery is used for the first arterial graft.