Perioperative risk and long-term results of heart transplantation after previous cardiac operations

Heart transplantation surgery in children and young adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Pediatric cardiac transplantation remains a surgical challenge as a variety of cardiac and vessel malformation are present in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Despite limited availability and acceptability of donor hearts, the number of heart transplantations remains on a stable level with improved survival and quality of life.

OBSERVATION

As treatment options for CHD continue to improve and the chances of survival increase, more adult CHD patients are listed for transplantation. This review focuses on the clinical challenges and modified techniques of pediatric heart transplantations.

CONCLUSION

Not only knowledge of the exact anatomy, but above all careful planning, interdisciplinary cooperation and surgical experience are prerequisites for surgical success.

Impact of Previous Conventional Cardiac Surgery on the Clinical Outcomes After Heart Transplantation

The impact of the type, purpose, and timing of prior surgery on heart transplantation (HT) remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of conventional cardiac surgery (PCCS) on HT outcomes. This study analyzed HTs performed between 1999 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with and without PCCS. Short-term outcomes, including post-transplant complications and mortality rates, were evaluated. Cox proportional and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to identify risk factors for mortality and assess long-term survival, respectively. Of 368 patients, 29% had PCCS. Patients with PCCS had a higher incidence of post-transplant complications. The in-hospital and 1 year mortality rates were higher in the PCCS group. PCCS and cardiopulmonary bypass time were significant risk factors for 1 year mortality (hazard ratios = 2.485 and 1.005, respectively). The long-term survival rates were lower in the PCCS group, particularly in the first year. In sub-analysis, patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and PCCS had the poorest outcomes. The era of surgery and timing of PCCS in relation to HT did not significantly impact outcomes. In conclusion, PCCS worsen the HT outcomes, especially in patients with ischemic etiology. However, the timing of PCCS and era of HT did not significantly affect this concern.

Early and long-term results of heart transplantation with reoperative sternotomy

Background

This study aims to investigate the effects of reoperative sternotomy on early and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of a total of 92 patients (72 males, 20 females; mean age 36 years; range, 3 to 61 years) who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between May 1998 and July 2014. The patients were divided into three groups. Group A (n=23) included patients who underwent previous cardiac surgery with sternotomy other than ventricular assist device implantation; Group B (n=12) included patients who were bridged-to-transplant with a ventricular assist device; and Group C (n=57) included patients who for the first time underwent heart transplantation without previous sternotomy. Preoperative and operative data of the three groups were compared. The short- and long-term outcomes of all groups were analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference among the groups, except for the age and preoperative international normalized ratio. Total ischemia time in the ventricular assist device group was longer than Group C. The length of intensive care unit stay was also longer in the ventricular assist device group than the other groups. The amount of postoperative chest tube drainage and blood transfusion was higher in Group A. Early mortality rate was significantly higher in Group A. There was no significant difference in survival among the three groups in the long-term. According to the logistic regression analysis, no variable was found to be a significant risk factor for mortality.

Conclusion

Reoperative sternotomy other than ventricular assist device implantation was found to be a risk factor for early mortality; however, mid and long-term survival rates were similar to patients in whom transplantation was the primary procedure. In patients with reoperative sternotomy, heart transplantation can be performed with similar risks to patients without resternotomy with careful selection and accurate pre- and intraoperative surgical approach.

Comparison of inhospital outcomes of pediatric heart transplantation between single ventricle congenital heart disease and cardiomyopathy

Data investigating the impact of household income and other factors on SV patient status-post-Fontan palliation after heart transplantation are lacking. We aim to evaluate factors affecting outcomes after OHT in this population. The PHIS database was interrogated for either SV or myocarditis/primary CM who were 4 years or older who underwent a single OHT. There were 1599 patients with a median age of 13.2 years (IQR: 9.3-16.1). Total hospital costs were significantly higher in the SV group ($408 000 vs $294 000, P < 0.0001), but as median household income increased, the risk of inhospital mortality, post-transplant LOS, and LOS-adjusted total hospital costs all decreased. The risk of inhospital mortality increased 6.5% per 1 year of age increase at the time of transplant. Patients in the SV group had significantly more diagnoses than those in the CM group (21 vs 15, P < 0.0001) and had longer total hospital LOSs as a result of longer post-transplant courses (25 days vs 15, P < 0.0001). Increased median household income and younger age are associated with decreased resource utilization and improved inhospital mortality in SV CHD patients who undergo OHT. In conclusion, earlier consideration of OHT in this population, coupled with improved selection criteria, may increase survival in this population.

The Influence of Prior Median Sternotomy on Outcome of Heart Transplantation

This study is a retrospective analysis of the influence of previous cardiac surgery on the outcome of heart transplantation in 118 consecutive recipients from January 1988 to December 1996. Group 1 consisted of 67 patients who had no previous sternotomy, group 2 was 33 patients who had one previous sternotomy, and group 3 was 18 patients who had two or more previous sternotomies. The three groups were demographically similar apart from the indication for transplantation and the sex distribution. Preoperative hemodynamic data, except systolic pulmonary artery pressure, were similar among the three groups. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality, 1-year and 5-year actuarial survival rates, incidence of renal dysfunction requiring dialysis, prolonged respiratory support, elevated total bilirubin, re-exploration for bleeding, incidence of mediastinitis, or postoperative hospital stay between the groups. The rejection-free and infection-free survival rates were similar in the three groups. However, previous sternotomy resulted in significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass times and increased requirement for blood and blood products. The use of a cell saver limited the need for stored red blood cells. This study demonstrated no survival disadvantage of previous sternotomy in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Prior sternotomy increases the mortality and morbidity of adult heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effect of prior sternotomy (PS) on the postoperative mortality and morbidity after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

Of 704 adults who underwent HTx from December 1988 to June 2012 at a single institution, 345 had no PS (NPS group) and 359 had ≥ 1 PS (PS group). Survival, intraoperative use of blood products, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, frequency of reoperation for bleeding, dialysis, and >48-hour ventilation were examined.

RESULTS

The NPS and PS groups had similar 60-day survival rates (97.1 ± 0.9% vs 95.3 ± 1.1%; P = .20). However, the 1-year survival was higher in the NPS group (94.7 ± 1.2% vs 89.7 ± 1.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.12-3.49; P = .016). The PS group had longer pump time and more intraoperative blood use (P < .0001 for both). Postoperatively, the PS group had longer ICU and hospital stays, and higher frequencies of reoperation for bleeding and >48-hour ventilation (P < .05 for all comparisons). Patients with 1 PS (1PS group) had a higher 60-day survival rate than those with ≥ 2 PS (2+PS group; 96.7 ± 1.1% vs 91.1 ± 3.0%; HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.04-7.01; P = .033). The 2+PS group had longer pump time and higher frequency of postoperative dialysis (P < .05 for both). Patients with prior VAD had lower 60-day (91.1 ± 3.0% vs 97.1 ± 0.9%; P = .010) and 1-year (87.4 ± 3.6% vs 94.7 ± 1.2%; P = .012) survival rates than NPS group patients. Patients with prior CABG had a lower 1-year survival than NPS group patients (89.0 ± 2.3% vs 94.7 ± 1.2%; P = .018).

CONCLUSION

The PS group had lower 1-year survival and higher intraoperative blood use, postoperative length of ICU and hospital stays, and frequency of reoperation for bleeding than the NPS group. Prior sternotomy increases morbidity and mortality after HTx.

Reoperative sternotomy is associated with increased mortality after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have examined factors affecting survival after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), few have evaluated the impact of reoperative sternotomy. We undertook this study to examine the incidence and impact of repeat sternotomies on OHT outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all adult OHT from 2 institutions. Primary stratification was by the number of prior sternotomies. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included blood product utilization and commonly encountered postoperative complications. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined mortality while linear regression models examined blood utilization.

RESULTS

From January 1995 to October 2011, 631 OHT were performed. Of these, 25 (4.0%) were redo OHT and 182 (28.8%) were bridged to transplant with a ventricular assist device; 356 (56.4%) had undergone at least 1 prior sternotomy. On unadjusted analysis, reoperative sternotomy was associated with decreased 90-day (98.5% vs 90.2%, p<0.001), 1-year (93.1% vs 79.6%, p<0.001), and 5-year (80.4% vs 70.1%, p=0.002) survival. This difference persisted on multivariable analysis at 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] 2.99, p=0.01), 1 year (HR 2.98, p=0.002), and 5 years (HR 1.62, p=0.049). The impact of an increasing number of prior sternotomies was negligible. On multivariable analysis, an increasing number of prior sternotomies was associated with increased intraoperative blood product utilization. Increasing blood utilization was associated with decreased 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperative sternotomy is associated with increased mortality and blood utilization after OHT. Patients with more than 1 prior sternotomy do not experience additional increased mortality. Carefully selected patients with multiple prior sternotomies have decreased but acceptable outcomes.

Does Re-operation have an Effect on Outcome Following Heart Transplantation?

OBJECTIVE

Previous cardiac operation has traditionally been considered as a potential risk factor for patients undergoing heart transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing heart transplantation as a second cardiac procedure and compare it with primary heart transplantation, using meta-analytical methodology.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken to identify relevant comparative studies. Outcomes of interest were classified into four categories: (a) intra-operative times; (b) post-operative outcomes; (c) resources; (d) actuarial outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies matched the selection criteria, reporting on 1004 patients. Six hundred and twenty-three had transplantation as primary operation and 381 as re-operation. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality were similar for the two groups (HR=0.85, p=0.54; HR=0.97, p=0.88; and HR=1.04, p=0.92, respectively). Total operative, cold-ischaemic, by-pass, and cross-clamp times were significantly longer for the re-operation group by 59.44 (p<0.001), 14.62 (p=0.05), 25.24 (p<0.001), and 7.93 (p<0.001)min, respectively. Both ICU and hospital stay were longer for the re-operation group but only the former was statistically significant (WMD=1.37; p=0.02). Post-operative complications were similar, except re-exploration rate and blood transfusion requirement, which were higher in the re-operation group (OR=3.51; p<0.001 and WMD=2.21; p<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplantation following previous cardiac operation is technically demanding requiring longer operative times compared to primary heart transplantation. It does not, however, add a significant risk to the survival of the patient, and associated morbidity is not significantly compromised.

Heart transplantation for end-stage valvular disease: indications and results

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study is to appraise the indications of a small group of heart transplanted patients with valvular disease, to analyse both their particular issues and results compared with the etiologies of other transplanted patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analysis of recent data shows that valvular patients represent between 3 and 5% of transplantation indications. This proportion of valvular patients had a tendency to decrease in many countries. These patients on the whole have undergone multiple reoperations. Pulmonary resistance analysis has to be especially rigorous for this group. A primary excess mortality is directly related to multiple reoperations. Mean and long-term results are then strictly comparable with other etiologies. There are a few very specific indications for recurrent endocarditis in this group.

SUMMARY

Valvular patients represent a subgroup of transplanted patients with a slight primary excess mortality but with identical long-term results.

Orthotopic heart transplantation for congenital heart defects: anomalies of the systemic venous return

Anomalies of the systemic venous return are frequently associated with other congenital heart defects. Some anomalies do not complicate really orthotopic heart transplantation (such as azygos continuation of the inferior vena cava). Other anomalies raise more difficulties; the most frequent one is persistent left superior vena cava draining into either the coronary sinus or the left atrium. Sometimes, the left superior vena cava can be ligated without untoward effect. In most cases, the left superior vena cava must be anastomosed to the right atrial compartment, preferably using extracardiac procedures. Most problems can be solved by harvesting extra lengths of donor superior vena cava and innominate vein. In rare patients, associated anomalies of the pulmonary venous return may require additional partitioning of the atria. The early risk of heart transplantation is probably not increased by the presence of such anomalies.

Surgical advances in heart and lung transplantation

The successes of thoracic transplantation have led to the expansion of indications and a subsequent growth in demand for a short supply of organs. In response to this disparity, the criteria for organ donation have been liberalized. Despite these difficult challenges, with advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care of both the donor and recipient, outcomes have continued to improve over time. This article focuses on the more recent surgical advances in donor selection and management, procurement and implantation, and the impact of these advances on patient outcome.

Cardiac transplantation after the Fontan or Glenn procedure

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the clinical course and outcome of cardiac transplantation after a failed Glenn or Fontan procedure.

BACKGROUND

Late complications of the Glenn or Fontan procedure, including ventricular failure, cyanosis, protein-losing enteropathy, thromboembolism, and dysrhythmias often lead to significant morbidity and mortality. If other therapies are ineffective, cardiac transplantation is the only therapeutic recourse. Transplantation in this unique population presents significant challenges in the operative and perioperative periods.

METHODS

The anatomic diagnoses, previous operations, clinical status, and indications for transplantation were characterized in patients transplanted after a Glenn or Fontan procedure. Outcomes after transplantation, including postoperative complications and mortality, were reviewed. Comparisons were made between survivors and nonsurvivors.

RESULTS

Primary orthotopic cardiac transplantation was performed in 35 patients (mean age 15.7 +/- 8.5 years) with a mean follow-up of 54 +/- 46 months. A total of 11 patients had undergone a Glenn shunt and 24 patients a Fontan procedure. Indications for transplantation were a combination of causes including ventricular dysfunction, failed Fontan physiology, and/or cyanosis. Ten patients died <or=2 months after transplantation; nine of the deaths occurred in the Fontan patients. Overall, one-year survival was 71.5%, and five-year survival was 67.5%. Survival was not significantly different between patients transplanted after a Glenn or Fontan procedure and patients transplanted for other etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac transplantation can be performed successfully in patients with end-stage congenital heart disease after a Glenn or Fontan procedure, with outcomes similar to transplantation for end-stage heart failure secondary to other etiologies.

Orthotopic heart transplantation: highlights and limitations

A little more than three decades after the successful introduction of cardiac transplantation, this revolutionary concept of advanced heart failure treatment has gained tremendous momentum and is considered the gold standard therapy in selected patients. More specific modalities of immunosuppression continue to decrease the impact of acute and chronic rejection and immunosuppression-related side effects. The success of cardiac transplantation has led to a widespread initiation of transplant programs and a run on cardiac transplantation waiting lists. The increasing gap between waiting lists and donor organ supply has stimulated research to identify those patients who benefit most from cardiac transplantation, as well as research to develop alternative therapies for advanced heart failure. Furthermore, it serves as a stimulus to address paradigmatic issues that are fundamental to modern medicine and society.

[Analysis of factors that can influence the appearance of acute heart transplant failure]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Acute graft failure (AGF) is defined as significant failure of myocardial function in a newly implanted heart. The aim of the present study was to investigate a series of factors related to heart transplantation (HT) in relation to AGF.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In a study of 287 consecutive HTs performed over a 14-year period, AGF was defined when: a) the surgeon observed ventricular dysfunction before closing the sternotomy; b) various inotropic drugs were required at high doses in the first days after surgery, or c) ventricular dysfunction was identified by routine echocardiography in the immediate postoperative period. Statistical analysis comprised a descriptive and univariate comparative study, followed by multivariate analysis based on application of a logistical regression model.

RESULTS

The incidence of AGF was 22%. Predictors of AGF were female donor status (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4; p = 0.02), a disproportion of more than 20% in donor-recipient body weight (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3; p = 0.02), and background ischemic heart disease (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 5.5-1.1; p = 0.03) or valve pathology (OR = 5.0; 95% CI, 7.0-1.5; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

AGF is a frequent pathology, which was present in 22% of our heart transplantation patients. Among the modifiable factors related to AGF was a clear disproportion in body weight and the size of grafts from female donors. Unmodifiable factors related to AGF were ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease as a cause of heart transplantation.

Recent trends in early outcome of adult patients after heart transplantation: a single-institution review of 251 transplants using standard donor organs

Older age, prior transplantation, pulmonary hypertension, and mechanical support are commonly seen in current potential cardiac transplant recipients. Transplants in 436 consecutive adult patients from 1994 to 1999 were reviewed. There were 251 using standard donors in 243 patients (age range 18-69 years). To emphasize recipient risk, 185 patients who received a nonstandard donor were excluded from analysis. The indications for transplant were ischemic heart disease (n = 123, 47%), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 82, 32%), and others (n=56, 21%). One hundred and forty-nine (57%) recipients were listed as status I; 5 and 6% were supported with an intra-aortic balloon and an assist device, respectively. The 30-d survival and survival to discharge were 94.7 and 92.7%, respectively; 1-year survival was 89.1%. Causes of early death were graft failure (n = 6), infection (n = 4), stroke (n = 4), multiorgan failure (n = 3) and rejection (n = 2). Predictors were balloon pump use alone (OR= 11.4, p =0.002), pulmonary vascular resistance > 4 Wood units (OR = 5.7, p = 0.007), pretransplant creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (OR = 6.9, p = 0.004) and female donor (OR = 8.3, p = 0.002). Recipient age and previous surgery did not affect short-term survival. Heart transplantation in the current era consistently offers excellent early and 1-year survival for well-selected recipients receiving standard donors. Early mortality tends to reflect graft failure while hospital mortality may be more indicative of recipient selection.