Is there an advantage to repairing infected mitral valves?

Early Surgery for Infective Endocarditis Complicated With Neurologic Injury

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the association between early surgery and the risk of mortality in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis in the context of stroke.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was a multiinstitution study based on the Chang Gung Research Database, which contains electronic medical records from 7 hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan; these include 2 medical centers, 2 regional hospitals, and 3 district hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with active left-sided infective endocarditis who underwent valve surgery between September 2002 and December 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

The authors divided patients into 2 groups, with versus without preoperative neurologic complications, had undergone early (within 7 d) or later surgery, and with brain ischemia or hemorrhage.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-two patients with a median time from diagnosis to surgery of 6 days were included. No significant differences in postoperative stroke, in-hospital mortality, or follow-up outcomes were observed between the patients with and without neurologic complications. Among the patients with preoperative neurologic complications, patients who underwent early surgery had a lower 30-day postoperative mortality rate (13.1% v 25.8%; hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.67). In the subgroup analysis of the comparison between brain ischemia and hemorrhage groups, there was no significant between-group difference in the in-hospital outcomes or outcomes after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Early cardiac surgery may be associated with more favorable clinical outcomes in patients with preoperative neurologic complications. Thus, preoperative neurologic complications should not delay surgical interventions.

Isolated mitral valve endocarditis: Patient, disease, and surgical factors that influence outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate patient characteristics, valve pathology, bacteriology, and surgical techniques related to outcome of patients who underwent surgery for isolated native (NVE) or prosthetic (PVE) mitral valve endocarditis.

METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2020, 447 isolated mitral endocarditis operations were performed, 326 for NVE and 121 for PVE. Multivariable analysis of time-related outcomes used random forest machine learning.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism. Of 326 patients with NVE, 88 (27%) underwent standard mitral valve repair, 43 (13%) extended repair, and 195 (60%) valve replacement. Compared with NVE with standard repair, patients who underwent all other operations were older, had more comorbidities, worse cardiac function, and more invasive disease. Hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 17); 0 (0%) after standard valve repair, 3 (7.0%) after extended repair, 8 (4.1%) after NVE replacement, and 6 (5.0%) after PVE re-replacement. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 91%, 75%, and 62% after any repair and 86%, 62%, and 44% after replacement, respectively. The most important risk factor for mortality was renal failure. Risk-adjusted outcomes, including survival, were similar in all groups. Unadjusted extended repair outcomes, particularly early, were similar or worse than replacement in terms of reinfection, reintervention, regurgitation, gradient, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient- and pathology-tailored approach to surgery for isolated mitral valve endocarditis has low mortality and excellent results. Apparent superiority of standard valve repair is related to patient characteristics and pathology. Renal failure is the most powerful risk factor. In case of extensive destruction, extended repair shows no benefit over replacement.

Limited Versus Radical Resection in Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis Surgery

Background: Mitral valve repair is preferred in patients undergoing surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) of the native mitral valve, however, radical resection of infected tissue and patch-plasty might potentially lead to low or non-durable repair. We aimed to compare a limited-resection and non-patch technique with the classic radical-resection technique. Methods: Eligible candidates were patients with definitive IE of the native mitral valve undergoing surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the surgical strategy into two groups: limited- versus radical-resection strategy. Propensity score matching was used. Endpoints were repair rate, all-cause mortality (30-day and 2-year), re-endocarditis and reoperation at q-year follow-up. Results: After propensity score matching, 90 patients were included. Follow-up was 100% complete. Mitral valve repair rate was 84% in the limited-resection versus 18% in the radical-resection strategy, p < 0.001. The 30-day and 2-year mortality were 20% versus 13% (p = 0.396) and 33% versus 27% (p = 0.490) in the limited-resection versus radical-resection strategy, respectively. The incidence of re-endocarditis during the 2-year follow-up was 4% in the limited-resection strategy versus 9% in the radical-resection strategy, p = 0.677. Three patients in the limited-resection strategy underwent reoperation of the mitral valve, while there were none in the radical-resection strategy (p = 0.242). Conclusions: Although mortality in patients with IE of the native mitral valve remains high, the limited-resection and non-patch surgical strategy is associated with a significantly higher repair rates with comparable 30-day and mid-term mortality, risk of re-endocarditis and re-operation compared to the radical-resection strategy.

Clinical outcomes following surgical mitral valve plasty or replacement in patients with infectious endocarditis: A meta-analysis

Background

For degenerative mitral disease, more and more evidences support that mitral valve plasty (MVP) has much better clincial outcomes than mitral valve replacement (MVR). However, the advantages of MVP in patients suffering from infectious endocarditis (IE) are unclear. To evaluate the appropriateness of MVP in IE patients, we conducted this meta-analysis. Based on the difference between active and healed phase, we not only compared the result of patients with IE, but also identified the subgroup with active IE.

Methods

We systematically searched the clinical trials comparing clinical outcomes of MVP and MVR in patients suffering from IE. Relevant articles were searched from January 1, 2000 to March 18, 2021 in Pubmed and Cochrane Library. Studies were excluded if they were with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score less than 6 or lacking of direct comparisons between MVP and MVR.

Results

23 studies were involved and 25,615 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed fewer adverse events and early or long-term death in the MVP group. However, more reoperations existed in this patient group. And the reinfection rate was close between two groups. Similar results were observed after identifying active IE subgroup, but there is no difference in the freedom from reoperation due to all-events.

Conclusions

Although limitimations exited in this study, patients suffering from IE can benefit from both MVP and MVR. For surgeons with consummate skills, MVP can be the preferred choice for suitable IE patients.

Mitral valve repair for endocarditis

Many authors have reported their results of mitral valve (MV) repair (MVr) in acute and healed endocarditis. However, the results published by different authors highlight the fact that the reparability rate for this indication remains low. Over the last three decades, our group has adopted an early and repair-oriented approach to infective endocarditis with the objective to improve the repair rate and the long-term results.‬ ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬ In this paper, we describe our institutional experience on mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬ Data for this paper were extracted from our institutional database on heart valve disease. From 1991 to 2015, 160 consecutive patients in our institution underwent MV surgery for active IE on native MV. The median follow-up was 122 months. This study was approved by the institutional ethics review board, and written informed consent was waived for this study given its retrospective design. Hospital mortality was 11.6% (n = 18). Early MV reoperation before hospital discharge was required in five (3.1%) patients. At 5, 10, and 15 years, overall survival in the MVr for endocarditis in the group was 79% ± 4%, 65% ± 5%, 57% ± 6%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 95% ± 2%, 88% ± 4%, and 81% ± 6%, respectively. Mitral infective endocarditis is an insidious pathology and his surgical approach can be challenging. An early and repair-oriented surgical approach can allow to improve reparability rates with good long-term durability and a low recurrence rate of endocarditis.

Should more patients be offered repair for mitral valve endocarditis? a single-centre 15-year experience

Objective

To describe the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair (MVr) versus mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with native valve infective endocarditis (IE) at a centre with high-repair rates.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study. From 2005 to 2021, 183 patients with active or healed native valve IE were included. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Patient status was last confirmed 31 March 2021. Secondary outcomes were post-operative MR, MV reoperation, length of post-operative intensive care stay and total hospital stay.

Results

85 patients (46.4%) underwent MVr and 98 (53.6%) underwent MVR. Follow-up was 98.9% complete. Mean follow-up time was 5.3 years with 17% of patients reaching a follow-up time of over 10 years. There were 47 deaths (25.7%) within the follow-up period. MVR patients were more likely to have higher logistic EuroSCORE, active IE and were less likely to have elective surgery. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality between MVr and MVR groups (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [0.59–2.00]). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, MVR patients had a higher all-cause mortality although there was no significant difference at the endpoint. Propensity score matching analysis showed a significantly higher mortality in the replacement group instead (p = 0.002), Subgroup analysis revealed there remained no significant difference in mortality even in patients with active IE (P-interaction = 0.859) or non-elective surgery (P-interaction = 0.122). MV reoperation (odds ratio 1.00 [0.24–4.12]), post-operative intensive care stay (p = 0.9650) and total hospital stay (p = 0.9144) were comparable.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrates repair was at least non-inferior to replacement in IE, supporting more aggressive use of repair. There is no reason the general principle of why repair is superior to replacement should not hold in IE, with enough operator expertise. Other experienced units should be encouraged to increase repair rates as feasible in line with current guidelines.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01997-2.

Early surgical intervention in culture-negative endocarditis of the aortic valve complicated by abscess in an infant: A case report

BACKGROUND

Surgical therapy of infective endocarditis (IE) involving aortic valves and mitral valves is widespread. However, there are few reports concerning patients with culture-negative endocarditis complicated by the appearance of comorbid valvular perforation and abscess. Therefore, real-time surveillance of changes in cardiac structure and function is critical for timely surgical management, especially in patients who do not respond to medical therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report an atypical case in a 9-mo-old infant without congenital heart disease but with symptoms of intermittent fever and macular rashes. Physical examination, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms suggested a diagnosis of IE, although the result of blood cultures was exactly negative. After treatment with antibiotic drugs, the patient got a transient recovery. On the 9^th day, we proceeded with continuous echocardiogram due to fever again and the results revealed aortic valve abscess with perforation, regurgitation, vegetation, and pericardial effusion. Intraoperative monitoring revealed aortic valve perforation, presence of apothegmatic cystic spaces below the left coronary cusp of the aortic valve, and severe aortic valve regurgitation. Aortic valve repair was performed by autologous pericardial patch plasty. The patient was discharged after 4 wk of treatment and no complications occurred after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our case demonstrated the necessity of serial echocardiography monitoring for possible adverse symptoms of IE in pediatric patients.

Repair of Isolated Native Mitral Valve Endocarditis: A Propensity Matched Study

In the setting of chronic primary mitral regurgitation, the benefit of mitral valve repair over replacement is well established. However, data comparing outcomes for mitral valve surgery for endocarditis is limited. We sought to determine whether mitral valve repair offers traditional advantages over replacement in the endocarditis population. Retrospective review of our institutional mitral valve database (N = 8,181) was performed between 1998 and 2019 for all adult patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery for endocarditis. Patients were stratified by mitral valve repair or replacement and propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and degree of valve damage. Overall, 267 surgeries (124 repair, 153 replacement) met inclusion criteria during the study period. Following propensity matching, the repair cohort was associated with shorter initial ventilator times (5.6 vs 7.9 hours, p = 0.05), shorter ICU (28 vs 52 hours, p = 0.03), and hospital lengths of stays (7 vs 11 days, p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality (0% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01) and 10-year survival (88% vs 86%, p = 0.55) were similar between cohorts. Patients in the repair cohort were less likely to require repeat mitral valve intervention at our institution for recurrent endocarditis than those in the replacement cohort (0% vs 10.6%, p = 0.03). Mitral valve repair is safe, when feasible, in the setting of isolated native valve endocarditis and may provide patients faster recovery. Experienced mitral surgeons should approach this patient population with a "repair if feasible" methodology.

Role of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Infective Endocarditis

The 2 primary objectives of surgery in mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE) are total removal of the infected tissue and reconstruction of cardiac morphology, including repair or replacement of the affected valve. Single-institution series have suggested the feasibility and effectiveness of mitral valve repair (MVrep) over replacement in mitral IE in terms of in-hospital mortality and long-term event-free survival. This article reviews the history, details of the relevant repair techniques, and clinical results of MVrep for mitral IE.

Patient and Surgeon Predictors of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Repair for Infective Endocarditis

Mitral repair (MVr) is superior to replacement for degenerative disease; however, its benefit is less established for endocarditis. We report outcomes of repair or replacement for mitral/tricuspid endocarditis and identify predictors of MVr. Patients undergoing first-time surgery for mitral (n = 260) or tricuspid (n = 71) endocarditis between 1992 to 2018 were identified. Patients with aortic endocarditis were excluded. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcome was MVr. Patients were stratified into active and treated endocarditis separately for mitral and tricuspid groups. Predictors of MVr were assessed through multivariable logistic regression and adjusted likelihood of MVr through marginal effects estimates. A mitral specialist was defined by performing ≥25 annual degenerative MVr. Among 331 patients, 70% (181/260) of those with mitral valve endocarditis and 52% (37/71) of those with tricuspid endocarditis underwent repair. The MVr group compared with replacement had a higher proportion of elective acuity and less diabetes, hypertension, active endocarditis, cardiogenic shock, and dialysis. Estimated 5-year survival did not differ between repair versus replacement for active mitral (68 ± 14% vs 60 ± 14%, P = 0.34) or tricuspid endocarditis (60 ± 17% vs 61 ± 19%, P = 0.67), but was superior after repair for treated mitral endocarditis (86 ± 7% vs 51 ± 24%, P = 0.014). Independent predictors of mortality included dialysis for active and treated mitral endocarditis, and mitral replacement (vs MVr) for treated mitral endocarditis. The likelihood of MVr was 82 ± 5% for mitral specialists and 47 ± 9% for non-specialists (P < 0.001). MVr for endocarditis should be pursued, if feasible. Importantly, achieving MVr was driven not only by patient factors, but also surgeon experience.

Fulminant Infective Endocarditis Due to Kingella Kingae and Several Complications in a 6-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report

Kingella kingae is a gram-negative coccobacillus belonging to the HACEK group (Haemophilus species, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species) and is a common oropharyngeal colonizer of healthy young children. Osteoarticular infection is the most commonly reported invasive Kingella kingae infection in children, usually presenting a mild clinical picture. However, it can also cause severe invasive infections, especially infective endocarditis, with a high complication rate. We report the case of a 6-year-old girl, with no past medical history, who presented with fulminant infective endocarditis due to Kingella kingae. She received emergency venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, rapidly underwent cardiac surgery, and was then treated using ceftriaxone for 4 weeks as recommended by the American Heart Association. The patient's postoperative course was marked by a cerebral ischemic stroke consistent with septic embolism. She also presented with a para-aortic pseudoaneurysm that required a secondary surgical procedure, with a good postoperative result. This report illustrates a case of fulminant infective endocarditis due to Kingella kingae and responsible for two major complications. We also describe the preventive valve surgery performed to ensure the preservation of valve function and its capacity for growth.

Outcomes of mitral valve repair in acute native mitral valve infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

Mitral valve repair (MVR) is considered the treatment of choice for mitral valve (MV) regurgitation. However, MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis is technically challenging and not commonly performed. Our goal was to report our outcomes of MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2017, 35 patients presenting with acute native MV infective endocarditis underwent MVR. Primary end points were successful MVR and freedom from recurrent endocarditis. Secondary end point was the postoperative incidence of major adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean age was 58 ± 13 years (74% men) and the median logistic EuroSCORE was 17.1%. Twenty patients underwent isolated MVR; the other 15 patients underwent concomitant procedures. MVR was performed with removal of the vegetation (vegectomy), limited resection of the infected tissue, direct closure of the defect, besides annuloplasty in all patients. Mean intensive care and hospital stays were 5 and 17 days, respectively. All-cause mortality was 11% (4/35) at 30 days and a total of 23% (8/35) within a follow-up period of 10 ± 7.7 months. Endocarditis recurred in 2 patients 15 and 8 months after surgery, respectively. Both underwent successful MV re-repair. Follow-up echocardiography indicated none-to-trace, mild or moderate regurgitation in 15, 10 and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis is a complex procedure, it offers a treatment option for such patients with acceptable short-term results. Limited resection in addition to annuloplasty is our preferred method of repair. Nevertheless, long-term results in a larger cohort are still mandatory.

Current AATS guidelines on surgical treatment of infective endocarditis

The 2016 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) guidelines for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) are question based and address questions of specific relevance to cardiac surgeons. Clinical scenarios in IE are often complex, requiring prompt diagnosis, early institution of antibiotics, and decision-making related to complications, including risk of embolism and timing of surgery when indicated. The importance of an early, multispecialty team approach to patients with IE is emphasized. Management issues are divided into groups of questions related to indications for and timing of surgery, pre-surgical work-up, preoperative antibiotic treatment, surgical risk assessment, intraoperative management, surgical management, surveillance, and follow up. Standard indications for surgery are severe heart failure, severe valve dysfunction, prosthetic valve infection, invasion beyond the valve leaflets, recurrent systemic embolization, large mobile vegetations, or persistent sepsis despite adequate antibiotic therapy for more than 5-7 days. The guidelines emphasize that once an indication for surgery is established, the operation should be performed as soon as possible. Timing of surgery in patients with strokes and neurologic deficits require close collaboration with neurological services. In surgery infected and necrotic tissue and foreign material is radically debrided and removed. Valve repair is performed whenever possible, particularly for the mitral and tricuspid valves. When simple valve replacement is required, choice of valve-mechanical or tissue prosthesis-should be based on normal criteria for valve replacement. For patients with invasive disease and destruction, reconstruction should depend on the involved valve, severity of destruction, and available options for cardiac reconstruction. For the aortic valve, use of allograft is still favored.

Surgical interventions of isolated active mitral valve endocarditis: Predisposing factors and impact of neurological insults on final outcome

The feasibility and durability of mitral valve (MV) repair in active infective endocarditis (IE) has been reported, but proper management of perioperative neurological complications and surgical timing remains uncertain and may crucially affect the outcome.In this single-center retrospective observational study, patients who underwent isolated MV surgery for active native IE in our institution between August 2005 and August 2015 were reviewed and analyzed. Patients who were operated on for healed IE or who required combined procedures were excluded from this study.A total of 71 patients were enrolled in the study with a repair rate of 53.5% (n = 38). Isolated posterior leaflet lesion was found in 15 patients (21%) and was related to higher reparability (86.7%, P = .004). The overall in-hospital mortality was 10 (14.1%): 3 (7.9%) in the repair group and 7 (21.2%) in replacement group (P = .17). Prognosis was not related to age, preoperative renal function, cerebral emboli, or duration of antibiotics. The only significant predictor was postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) [odds ratio 14.628 (1.649-129.78), P = .04]. At a mean follow-up period of 43.1 months, neither recurrent endocarditis nor late cardiac death was observed in both groups.Surgical timing and procedural options of MV surgery in active native IE did not make any difference, but occurrence of ICH after surgery jeopardized the final outcome. Routine preoperative brain imaging to detect silent ICH or mycotic aneurysm and aggressive treatment of these lesions may prevent catastrophe and optimize the results.

Role of mitral valve repair in active infective endocarditis: long term results

BACKGROUND

Although mitral valve repair is at present the technique of choice in mitral regurgitation (MR) due to degenerative valve disease, long term results in patients with active mitral infective endocarditis (IE) are still under evaluation.

METHODS

In the study were included 34 consecutive patients (22 males; mean age, 60 years; range 32-84 years) referred to our institution between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2011 who were treated with valve repair for mitral valve (MV) active infective endocarditis. Eighteen patients underwent isolated MV repair. Aortic valve replacement and respectively repair were performed in 9 and 2 patients with concomitant aortic involvement. Blood cultures were positive in 30 (17 Staphylococcus, 13 Streptococcus, 1 g negative, 2 enterococcus).

RESULTS

Four patients died during hospital stay (11%) due to multi system organ failure as a consequence of severe septic shock (2 patients), cardiogenic shock (1 case) and respiratory failure (1 patient). At an average follow up of 48 months in patients discharged alive from hospital survival was 96.7% (29 out of 30). None developed more than mild- to moderate mitral valve regurgitation during follow-up and we found a significant improvement in functional capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction associated with a significant decrease of pulmonary artery pressure. The only recurrence of endocarditis occurred in a drug addict patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Present investigation suggest that in patients with active mitral valve endocarditis MV repair, when technically feasible, is associated with a favorable clinical long term outcome. None of the patients alive at the end of follow-up developed severe mitral regurgitation. Moreover mortality and reinfection rate are uncommon and functional improvement.

Mitral Valve Repair for Extended Commissural Prolapse Involving Complex Prolapse

We reviewed our experience of mitral valve repair techniques for extended commissural prolapse involving complex prolapse of either or both leaflets, due to chordal rupture or elongation. Between June 1991 and January 2005, 21 of 210 patients who underwent mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation had extended commissural prolapse involving either or both of the anterior and posterior leaflets. There were 17 (81%) patients with degenerative and 4 (19%) with infective endocarditis. The distribution of diseased mitral commissural lesions was: posteromedial commissure in 14 (67%) patients, anterolateral in 6 (29%), and bilateral in 1 (5%). Reconstructive techniques included leaflet folding plasty in 10, resection-suture in 6, the sliding technique in 2, commissuroplasty in 2, and chordal shortening in 1. There were no perioperative deaths; postoperative mitral regurgitation was none or trivial in 19 patients and mild in 2. The mean follow-up period was 54 months (range, 2–155 months), and no patient required re-operation. There was one late death from a noncardiac cause at 103 months. Mitral valve repair for extended commissural prolapse is satisfactory. We consider leaflet folding plasty and its modification to be effective in patients who require extensive leaflet resection in the commissural area.

Mitral valve repair versus replacement

Degenerative, ischemic, rheumatic and infectious (endocarditis) processes are responsible for mitral valve disease in adults. Mitral valve repair has been widely regarded as the optimal surgical procedure to treat mitral valve dysfunction of all etiologies. The supporting evidence for repair over replacement is strongest in degenerative mitral regurgitation. The aim of the present review is to summarize the data in each category of mitral insufficiency and to provide recommendations based upon this data.

Valvular repair or replacement for mitral endocarditis: 7-year cohort study

Background

A few studies have compared mitral valve repair and replacement in the setting of infective endocarditis, with varying results. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of mitral repair and replacement in endocarditis patients.

Methods

All patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement for active mitral endocarditis during 2005–2011 were included. Operative and follow-up mortality, composite morbidity, recurrent endocarditis, and redo operations were prespecified endpoints for analyses.

Results

There were 25 and 35 patients undergoing mitral valve repair and replacement, respectively. They were followed-up for 3.9 ± 2.5 years. Valve replacement patients were older ( p = 0.029), had a higher prevalence of intracardiac abscess ( p = 0.035), previous endocarditis ( p = 0.036), atrial fibrillation ( p = 0.001), worse renal function ( p = 0.013), higher risk scores ( p = 0.004–0.020), and longer operation times ( p < 0.001). Repair and replacement had similar rates of operative mortality (4.0% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.634), composite morbidity (16.0% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.357), survival ( p = 0.564), recurrent endocarditis ( p = 0.081), and redo operations ( p = 0.813). Independent predictors of operative mortality were preoperative inotropic or intraaortic balloon pump support. The independent predictor of mortality during follow-up was dialysis. Independent predictors of composite morbidity were intracardiac abscess and hypercholesterolemia. The independent predictor of recurrent endocarditis was previous endocarditis, and the independent predictor of redo operation was previous stroke.

Conclusion

Mitral valve replacement candidates had more baseline risk factors and higher raw rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, which did not reach statistical significance.

Repair versus replacement of the aortic valve in active infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve repair has advantages over replacement in stable aortic regurgitation. It is unclear whether this is similar in active endocarditis.

METHODS

From January 2000 to July 2009, 100 patients (age 54.9±15.1 years) underwent surgery for aortic valve endocarditis. Thirty-three patients were treated by valve repair (I) and 67 underwent valve replacement (II: 51 biologic, 10 mechanical valves, 6 Ross operations). In Group I, cusp and root lesions were treated by autologous pericardial patches. A root abscess was present in 32 cases (I: 27%, II 34%; P=0.82). Concomitant procedures (n=49) were mitral repair (I: 10, II: 11; P=0.12) and coronary bypass (I: 4, II: 11; P=0.77). All patients were followed. Cumulative follow-up was 268 patient-years (mean 2.7±3.0 years). In a retrospective analysis, we analysed the outcome.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 15% (I: 9%, II: 18%; P=0.37). Survival at 5 years was significantly better after repair (I: 88%, II 65%; P=0.047). Ten patients were reoperated (I: 35%, II: 10%; P=0.021) between 1 month and 5 years postoperatively. Actuarial freedom from aortic regurgitation of grade II or higher was 80% at 5 years (I: 66%, II: 87%; P=0.066). In Group I, this was influenced by aorto-ventricular (AV) morphology (tricuspid 80%, bicuspid 50%; P=0.0045). Freedom from reoperation in reconstructed tricuspid valves (n=20) was 87% at 5 years, which was identical to Group II (P=0.40). At 5 years, freedom from thromboembolic events was 93% (I: 100%, II: 90%; P=0.087) and that from bleeding complications was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

AV repair for active endocarditis seems to lead to better survival compared with replacement. The use of large patches in combination with bicuspid anatomy results in increased risk of late failure.

Emergency surgery for native mitral valve endocarditis: the impact of septic and cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists about the real impact of the etiology of shock on early and late outcome after emergency surgery in acute native mitral valve endocarditis (ANMVE). This multicenter study analyzed the impact of the etiology of shock on early and late outcome in patients with ANMVE.

METHODS

Data were collected in eight institutions. Three hundred-seventy-nine ANMVE patients undergoing surgery on an emergency basis between May 1991 and December 2009 were eligible for the study. According to current criteria used for the differential diagnosis of shock, patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups: group 1, no shock (n=154), group 2, cardiogenic shock (CS [n=118]), and group 3, septic shock (SS [n=107]). Median follow-up was 69.8 months.

RESULTS

Early mortality was significantly higher in patients with SS (p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with patients with CS, patients with SS had more than 3.8 times higher risk of death. That rose to more than 4 times versus patients without shock. In addition, patients with SS had 4.2 times and 4.3 times higher risk of complications compared with patients with CS and without shock, respectively. Sepsis was also an independent predictor of prolonged artificial ventilation (p=0.04) and stroke (p=0.003) whereas CS was associated with a higher postoperative occurrence of low output syndrome and myocardial infarction (p<0.001). No difference was detected between groups in 18-year survival, freedom from endocarditis, and freedom from reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that emergency surgery for ANMVE in patients with CS achieved satisfactory early and late results. In contrast, the presence of SS was linked to dismal early prognosis. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger studies.

Evaluation of transmitral pressure gradients in the intraoperative echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair

Objective

Acute mitral stenosis (MS) following mitral valve (MV) repair is a rare but severe complication. We hypothesize that intraoperative echocardiography can be utilized to diagnose iatrogenic MS immediately after MV repair.

Methods

The medical records of 552 consecutive patients undergoing MV repair at a single institution were reviewed. Post-cardiopulmonary bypass peak and mean transmitral pressure gradients (TMPG), and pressure half time (PHT) were obtained from intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) examinations in each patient.

Results

Nine patients (9/552 = 1.6%) received a reoperation for primary MS, prior to hospital discharge. Interestingly, all of these patients already showed intraoperative post-CPB mean and peak TMPGs that were significantly higher compared to values for those who did not: 10.7±4.8 mmHg vs 2.9±1.6 mmHg; p<0.0001 and 22.9±7.9 mmHg vs 7.6±3.7 mmHg; p<0.0001, respectively. However, PHT varied considerably (87±37 ms; range: 20–439 ms) within the entire population, and only weakly predicted the requirement for reoperation (113±56 vs. 87±37 ms, p = 0.034). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed strong discriminating ability for mean gradients (AUC = 0.993) and peak gradients (area under the curve, AUC = 0.996), but poor performance for PHT (AUC = 0.640). A value of ≥7 mmHg for mean, and ≥17 mmHg for peak TMPG, best separated patients who required reoperation for MS from those who did not.

Conclusions

Intraoperative TEE diagnosis of a peak TMPG ≥17 mmHg or mean TMPG ≥7 mmHg immediately following CPB are suggestive of clinically relevant MS after MV repair.

[Early surgery in patients with native valve endocarditis]

Between January 1990 and December 2006, 93 patients with infective endocarditis on native valves were operated in the active phase of the disease. The average age of our patients was 32 years with a male ascendancy. The causal heart disorder was found in 89 % of the cases, dominated by rheumatoid arthritis. The germ in cause was isolated in 52.6 % of the cases. The operative indication was hemodynamic in 29 cases, infectious in nine cases, mixed in 29 cases and embolic in 26 cases. The average operating delay was of 13 days with regard to the beginning of the antibiotic treatment. We realized a valvular aortic replacement at 32 patients with reconstruction of the ring in six cases, a valvular mitral replacement at 29 patients, a mitroaortic replacement at 21 patients, a reconstructive mitral surgery in nine cases, a valvular tricuspid replacement in one case and a reconstructive tricuspid surgery in one case. The early mortality was 13 %. The follow-up was 89 % with an average recession of 3.1 years and a late mortality of 5 %. The aim of this study is to analyze the immediate and late results of the surgery of infective endocarditis in the active phase and to bring to light the prognostic factors of mortality.

Mitral valve infective endocarditis: benefit of early operation and aggressive use of repair

BACKGROUND

In-hospital mortality rates for left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) exceed 20%. We investigated the outcomes of an aggressive approach to mitral valve IE that emphasizes early surgical intervention and preferential performance of mitral valve repair.

METHODS

We reviewed 89 consecutive operations in 87 patients for native mitral valve IE at a single institution from 2002 to 2007. Operations occurred promptly after completion of preoperative studies. Independent risk factors for death were investigated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Mitral valve repair was accomplished in 56 of 89 patients (63%). Perioperative mortality was 4.4% (n = 4). Survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 89.9% (80 of 89) and 82.0% (73 of 90). There was a survival benefit for repair vs replacement at 1 (p = 0.03) and 5 years (p = 0.0017). Repair vs replacement (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.72), diabetes (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.18 to 16.66), and renal failure (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.3 to 12.91) were independent risk factors for late mortality. Among 59 patients with active IE, preoperative head computed tomography (CT) showed 29 (49%) had abnormalities, including 12 (41%) with intracerebral hemorrhage. The median interval was 4 days from admission to operation. The rate of permanent postoperative stroke was 1.1% (1 of 89).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support early surgical therapy for mitral valve IE. Head CT abnormalities do not warrant delay of operation. Mitral valve repair was associated with a long-term survival advantage compared with valve replacement.

Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in patients with active or healed infective endocarditis (IE) with mitral regurgitation and evaluated effects on left ventricular (LV) function and structure.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 19 patients who underwent MV operations for IE between December 2004 and September 2007. MV repair was performed for acute IE in 10 of 15 patients (67%) and for healed IE in 4 of 4 patients (100%).

RESULTS

No early or late postoperative deaths were encountered. One patient underwent redo MV repair owing to severe mitral regurgitation 1 month postoperatively. Postoperative echocardiography after MV repair demonstrated less than trivial (acute IE in seven, healed IE in three) or mild (acute IE in three, healed IE in one) mitral regurgitation. In patients with MV replacement, the postoperative left atrial dimension (LAD) was decreased (51.5 +/- 39.2 vs. 39.2 +/- 1.9 mm, P = 0.007); however LV end-diastolic dimension (LVDD) and LV end-systolic dimension were unchanged. In patients with MV repair, LVDD (57.5 +/- 6.5 vs. 46.0 +/- 5.6 mm, P < 0.001), LV end-systolic dimension (36.1 +/- 5.2 vs. 32.4 +/- 6.2 mm, P = 0.04), LAD (43.1 +/- 8.1 vs. 33.6 +/- 7.7 mm, P = 0.003) were reduced. Postoperative ejection fraction (55.3 +/- 13.5% vs. 41.8% +/- 10.0%, P = 0.03) and fraction shortening (30.1% +/- 9.2% vs. 20.7% +/- 5.5%, P = 0.03) were better in patients with MV repair than those with MV replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

MV repair is feasible in patients with both active and healed IE. MV repair preserves better LV function and structure postoperatively.

Mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet prolapse: surgical techniques review and 16-year follow-up results

OBJECTIVE

Mitral valve repair is now the surgical treatment of choice for mitral regurgitation. However, the repair of anterior leaflet prolapse due to chordal rupture or elongation remains a technically challenging procedure. Here, we review our experience and present the long-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to anterior leaflet prolapse.

METHODS

Between January 1988 and August 2006, 210 patients with mitral regurgitation underwent mitral valve reconstruction. We performed mitral valve repair in 49 patients with mitral regurgitation due to anterior leaflet prolapse. The preoperative degree of mitral regurgitation was moderate to severe in all patients. There were 36 patients (73.5%) with degenerative, eight (16.3%) with infective endocarditis, and five (10.2%) with rheumatic. Reconstructive techniques included chordal replacement in 13 patients, chordal shortening in 14, chordal transposition in five, chordal shortening and reinforcement with artificial chordae in four, leaflet folding plasty in six, and resection-suture in four.

RESULTS

Follow-up was complete with an average of 89 +/- 59 months (range 1-201 months). In the early postoperative period, transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients. The grade of regurgitation was trivial (Grade I) in 17 patients (34.7%) and mild (Grade II) in seven patients (14.3%). Survival rate at 10 and 15 years was 95.2% and 88.9%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 10 and 15 years was 95.8% and 89.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results of mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet prolapse are satisfactory, with low mortality and morbidity. In particular, chordal replacement using temporary Alfieri stitch is a simple and effective procedure.

[Conservative mitral valve surgery in the treatment of mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis. Report of 21 cases]

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility of mitral valve repair in patients with infective endocarditis (IE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-seven patients operated for mitral endocarditis between 1995 and 2005; 21 underwent mitral valve repair. The repair was performed for acute endocarditis in seven patients at a median of 14 days after the onset of treatment and 14 patients for healed endocarditis after a median of six months.

RESULTS

Mitral valve repair was feasible in 21 patients (45%). This repair involved mitral annuloplasty in 16 patients (76%), shortening or transposition of chordae in 10 patients (48%), a pericardial patch in five patients (24%), and suture of perforation in two patients (9%). Associated procedures were aortic valve replacement in seven patients and tricuspid annuloplasty in two. There were no operative deaths. The mean follow up was five years (one to 11). One patient was reoperated for severe mitral regurgitation and another had a stroke due to cerebrovascular embolism in the first postoperative years. No recurrence of infectious endocarditis occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair in IE gives satisfactory results in terms of survival and symptomatic improvement with a low operative risk. With antibiotic therapy, it provides a cure of mitral lesions even when carried out in the acute phase of endocarditis. Finally, it feasible in several cases with excellent results.

Reconstructive surgery in active mitral valve endocarditis: feasibility, safety and durability

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate timing for surgery and management of complex valve lesions in patients with active mitral valve (MV) endocarditis. Results are based on 13 years of experience with MV repair in active endocarditis.

METHOD

Between 1993 and 2005, 81 patients were operated for active MV endocarditis, of which 63 (or 78%) had MV repair. For all patients, the median time between diagnosis and surgery was 10 days. Diverse surgical techniques were applied to restore MV competence. In 59% of the patients, pericardial patches, tricuspid autograft or partial MV homografts were used as leaflet substitutes. In addition, prosthetic rings were employed in 44% of the patients.

RESULTS

The overall operative mortality was 17.5%. However, considering only patients in preoperative NYHA class I or II, the operative mortality could be reduced to 4.8%. NYHA class > or =3, elevated age (above 70 years) and history of valvular were the three independent risks factors for early mortality in our multivariate analysis. The average follow-up time was 60+/-37 months. During this period, five late deaths occurred, two of which were cardiac-related. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rate was 73+/-12% and 69+/-13%, respectively. In hospital survivors, freedom from cardiac death after 5 and 10 years was 93+/-8%. Three early and five late MV reoperations occurred in seven patients, of them four could have MV re-repair. Only one endocarditis recurrence occurred after 4 months in a chronic haeamodialysed patient. Freedom from MV reoperation was 89+/-10% and 72+/-24% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Ten-year freedom from MV replacement and from endocarditis recurrence were 95+/-5% and 98+/-1%, respectively. Annular abscesses and calcified or rheumatic MV disease were two independent risk factors associated with reoperation in our multivariate analysis. During the follow-up period, all patients were in NYHA class I or II; 89% of patients had mitral regurgitation grade < or =I, only 11% had grade II on transthoracic echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

Using diverse and advanced techniques of MV repair, a reparability rate of 80% can be reached among patients with active endocarditis. We demonstrate that a high level of safety and excellent durability of MV repair can be obtained even for complex repairs.

Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement in Endocarditis: A Systematic Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies have suggested a superior survival after mitral valve repair compared with replacement in patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis. The objective of this study was to systematically review the rate of morbidity and mortality associated with mitral valve repair or replacement in infective endocarditis.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted for literature and a systematic review of 24 studies, reporting prognosis of patients who underwent surgery for mitral valve endocarditis, was performed. Information on the patients, type of surgery, and follow-up was abstracted using standardized protocols.

RESULTS

A total of 470 patients (39%) underwent mitral valve repair and 724 patients (61%) underwent valve replacement. Lower in-hospital mortality (2.3% versus 14.4%, relative risk: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.30, p < 0.0001) and long-term mortality (7.8% versus 40.5%, relative risk: 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 0.29, p < 0.0001) were observed among patients undergoing mitral valve repair compared with replacement. In addition, the rates of early reoperation (2.2% versus 12.7%, p < 0.0001), early cerebrovascular events (4.7% versus 11.5%, p = 0.045), late reoperation (4.7% versus 8.7%, p = 0.039), late recurrent endocarditis (1.8% versus 7.3%, p = 0.0013), and late cerebrovascular events (1.6% versus 24.4%, p < 0.0001) were significantly lower after mitral valve repair. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that mitral valve repair over replacement was associated with a better early and late prognosis after surgery. Male sex and acute surgery were (nonsignificantly) predictive of worse early outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of literature showed that mitral valve repair is associated with good clinical in-hospital and long-term results among patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis.

Importance of surgical timing on postoperative outcome in patients with native valve acute endocarditis

BACKGROUND

The present study was undertaken to establish whether surgical outcome could be influenced by surgical timing in patients affected by native valve endocarditis (NVE).

METHODS

From March 2002 to December 2004, 19 patients underwent surgical operation for NVE. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in ten patients (53%), mitral valve repair (MVRep) was performed in five patients (26%) and multivalvular procedures were performed in the remaining four patients (21%). In three patients (15.5%), emergency surgery was required for refractory congestive heart failure, urgent surgery was necessary in ten patients [in six patients (31%) for paravalvular abscess, in three patients (15.5%) for macrovegetations and in one patient (6%) for systemic embolism, respectively], five patients (26.3%) with isolated valve incompetence underwent elective surgery, whereas delayed surgery was reserved for one patient (6%) because of pre-operative embolic stroke.

RESULTS

There were no surgical procedure, cardiac or infectious related deaths at 30 days in the entire group. One patient died from an intravenous overdose. Follow-up was 100% complete in the 18 hospital survivors and ranged from 4 to 37 months (mean 14.2 +/- 10 months). There were no late death, recurrence of endocarditis, or re-operation at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical results for NVE are excellent if surgical timing criteria are correctly applied during the acute phase of the infectious process. Immediate surgical correction is required when rapid hemodynamic deterioration occurs whereas a more aggressive surgical approach appears to be advisable in the case of paravalvular abscess, macrovegetations or systemic embolism. Delayed surgery is recommended when pre-operative stroke develops.

Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of mitral valvle repair in patients with infective endocarditis (IE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-one patients who had undergone mitral valve surgery for IE were reviewed. Valve repair was performed in 8 patients with active and in 6 patients with healed endocarditis: 6 of these 14 patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV preoperatively. Valve replacement was performed in 5 patients with active endocarditis and in 2 with healed endocarditis: 6 of these 7 patients were NYHA functional class III or IV preoperatively. Repair techniques included annuloplasty (n=13), resection-suture (n=13), chordal transfer (n=2), and closure of the perforation (n=3). In the valve replacement group, 6 patients required concomitant aortic valve replacement. In the valve repair group, 1 patient died and 1 patient required reoperation for recurrent mitral regurgitation. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated no (n=8) or mild (n=4) mitral regurgitation at the last follow-up examination. In the valve replacement group, 1 patient died and 1 patient required reoperation because of a paravalvular leak. No cases of recurrent infection occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve repair in patients with IE is feasible and has low morbidity.

Surgical reconstruction of the mitral valve

From Cutler's first attempt to treat the mitral valve by inserting a tenotomy knife through the left ventricle, to Carpentier's introduction of several repair techniques and a functional classification for assessing mitral valve lesions, the history of mitral valve treatment is exciting. Mitral diseases may be degenerative, ischaemic, infective or rheumatic, with or without superimposed impaired left ventricular function and calcification. Understanding the underlying pathological features is also important in determining whether mitral valve repair is feasible, how the valve should be repaired and the prospect for long-term durability of the repair. Recent advances in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery are promising but more effort is needed to ensure timely mitral valve repair.