Coronary artery bypass grafting "on pump": role of three-day discharge

Outcomes of 3-day discharge after elective cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Shorter length of stay (LOS) is a welcome consequence of optimized perioperative care. However, accelerated hospital discharge may have unintended consequences. Before implementing an institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, we evaluated the safety of shorter LOS and compared outcomes of patients with shorter LOS (LOS ≤ 3 days) to those with longer LOS (LOS > 3 days).

METHODS

We identified all patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between July 2004 and June 2017. Transcatheter approaches, ventricular assist devices, transplants, and traumas were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts, one with shorter hospitalizations (LOS ≤ 3 days) and one with longer hospitalizations (LOS > 3 days). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and differences between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 5,987 patients (63.0 ± 13.8 years old, 34% female) were identified and 131 (2.2%) patients were LOS ≤ 3 days; median STS Risk score was 1.2 (0.6-2.4). PSM resulted in a total of 478 patients (357 LOS > 3 and 121 LOS ≤ 3 days); median STS Risk score was 0.4 (0.3-0.9). LOS ≤ 3 days had lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation (2% vs. 19%; p < .001) and major in-hospital complications (0% vs. 9%; p = .001); however, 30-day readmissions (8% LOS ≤ 3 vs. 6% LOS > 3 days; p = .66) and mortality rates (0% vs. 0%) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

LOS ≤ 3 days was associated with less postoperative atrial fibrillation and fewer major in-hospital complications. LOS ≤ 3 days was not associated with rehospitalization or mortality. Shorter LOS after elective cardiac surgery appears to be a safe practice with favorable outcomes, especially in low operative risk patients.

A Case Report Examining Early Extubation Following Congenital Heart Surgery in a Low Resource Setting

This case report aims to critically analyse the evidence surrounding early extubation in the post-operative phase following complex congenital cardiac surgery. Child A was an 8 year old female who had undergone complex congenital cardiac surgery during an international surgical charity mission. On admission to the paediatric intensive care unit Child A appeared to be in good condition and no major complications had occurred intra-operatively. This was considered alongside the situational pressures of resource limitations and the mission's aim to offer surgery to as many children as possible during the available time frame. The decision was made by the team that Child A was a suitable candidate for 'early extubation.' Some members of the team were uncomfortable with this approach and felt it could lead to poorer outcomes for patients. Current evidence surrounding early extubation both within international surgical mission trips to low-income and middle-income countries and established cardiac centres within high-income countries is examined and discussed alongside the context of resource limitation. Although the process and implications of early extubation following cardiac surgery needs further research, on the basis of the evidence currently available clinicians could potentially encourage the use of early extubation within clinical practice (for appropriately selected patients) through the utilisation of a multidisciplinary approach, both within the UK and during international surgical charity missions to low-income and middle-income countries.

[Implication of early extubation after cardiac surgery for postoperative rehabilitation]

Introduction

Postoperative rehabilitation after cardiac surgery is based on medical-surgical management in order to reduce the lenght of stay in hospital and the costs of this high risk surgery. Early tracheal extubation (within the first 6 hours) is the cornerstone of fast-track surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate fast-track practice and early tracheal extubation in scheduled cardiac surgery for adult patients in our Institution.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive study including all patients aged over 18 years who consecutively had undergone scheduled cardiac surgery and postoperative treatment in the post-operative intensive care unit in the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery at the Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax. Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18 years and older who had undergone scheduled cardiac surgery and postoperative treatment in the post-operative intensive care unit in the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Standardized anaesthetic protocol was used in all cases: propofol, remifentanil, cisatracrium. We recorded the mean postoperative extubation time and the factors affecting extubation time.

Results

We collected data from 200 patients who consecutively had undergone scheduled cardiac surgery. Among these patients, 115 underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, 79 valvular surgery and 6 combined surgery or another surgical procedure. Patients' demographic characteristics were comparable. 152 patients (76%) underwent postoperative extubation within the first 6 hours. 48 patients couldn't be extubated within the FIrst 6 hours. The main causes of early extubation failure were: catecholamines in high doses, bleeding, arrhythmia and neurological disorders.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that postoperative rehabilitation can be performed in our Institution and that all patients undergoing scheduled cardiac surgery should be candidates for early extubation.

A Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Fast-Track Recovery after Cardiac Surgery

<p><b>Background:</b> In the last 5 decades, the care of cardiac surgical patients has improved with the aid of strategies aimed at facilitating patient recovery. One of the innovations in this context is "fast-tracking" or "rapid recovery." This process refers to all interventions that aim to shorten a patient's stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) through accelerating the patient's transfer to a step-down or telemetry unit and to the general ward.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Patients were allocated to 2 groups. The fast-track group (n = 84) went through an independent theatre recovery unit (TRU). The patients were then transferred on the same day to an intermediate care unit and transferred on the following day to the ward. The intensive care group (52 patients) went to the ICU for at least 1 day, after which they were transferred to the ward.</p><p><b>Results and Discussion:</b> The fast-track pathway significantly reduced the length of stay (LOS) in an intensive care facility (<i>P</i> < .001). The duration of intubation was reduced from a median of 4.08 hours (range, 1.17-13.17 hours) in the intensive care group to 2.75 hours (range, 0.25-18.57 hours) in the fast-track group (<i>P</i> < .001). However, the median values for total hospital LOS, incidences of complications, reintubation, and readmission were similar for the 2 groups. The incidence of failure in the fast-track group was 10%. The mean (SD) cost of the perioperative care was �4182 � �2284 ($6683 � 3650) for the fast-track patients, compared with �4553 � �1355 ($7277 � $2165) for the intensive care group.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Fast-track recovery after cardiac surgery decreases the intensive care LOS and the total duration of intubation. It is a cost-effective strategy compared with conventional recovery protocols; however, it does not reduce the total hospital LOS or the incidence of complications.</p>

Caring for Octogenarian Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients at Home

Rates of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on octogenarians have been rising by more than 15% each year since the mid-1980s. Little is known about the experience of caring for this select group of patients at home after discharge. The purpose of this study was to describe the lived experience of caring for very elderly (80 years or older) CABG patients during convalescence at home. Using hermeneutic/phenomenological methods, 12 family caregivers were interviewed at home during the 4-week postdischarge period. Analysis of data derived from interviews revealed that work, personal reaction to caregiving, and experiences with formal care were recurrent themes. Caregivers indicated through their stories that caring for a recovering octogenarian at home after CABG surgery entailed a great deal of work that moderated at about 4 weeks after discharge. The caregivers also described varied reactions, both emotional and pragmatic, as the weeks unfolded. In addition, the data revealed a range of experiences, positive and negative, with healthcare providers and facilities. The study findings indicate a need for improvements in the following areas: preoperative, postoperative, and discharge education for family members involved in the care of the elderly CABG patient, and communication within and between healthcare organizations with regard to discharge planning.

Readmission and mortality in patients discharged the day after off-pump coronary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

The fate of patients discharged the day following off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) has not previously been reported. We studied the mortality and readmissions of a consecutive series of patients discharged after OPCAB, and compared the outcomes of those discharged the day following surgery to the rest of the group.

METHODS

All patients having OPCAB through median sternotomy during the calendar year 2000 by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Demograghics, intraoperative variables and postoperative complications, readmissions and mortality were recorded. Factors were analyzed to determine associations with time of discharge and readmission.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients had isolated OPCAB averaging 3.1 grafts. Two patients (1.8%) died before discharge. Sixty-three of 113 patients (55.8%) were discharged on day 1 and 8 (12.7%) required readmission compared to 13 of 50 (26%) discharged later. Diabetes (p = 0.04) and renal failure (p = 0.01) exhibited univariate association with day 1 discharge while multivariate analysis added infarction. The combination of previous bypass, obesity, acute myocardial infarction, and hypertension was associated with readmission in the entire OPCAB group but not in day 1 discharged patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The readmission rate for the entire group (18.6%) was high but lower in day 1 discharge patients (12.7%). Day 1 discharge (55.8%) was unusual in patients with diabetes, renal failure, or recent infarction. Previous bypass, obesity, acute myocardial infarction, and hypertension were associated with readmission for the entire group only. Day 1 discharged patients had no deaths or serious consequences, and there were no readmissions in more than 87%.

Reoperative Coronary Bypass Surgery Using Normothermic Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Comparison with First-Time Procedures

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is characterized by increased patient risk compared with first-time CABG. The reason for higher risk is not completely understood but it is logically related to inadequate myocardial preservation evidenced by the higher incidence of postoperative low-output syndrome. We compared normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with cold blood maintenance cardioplegia in both first-time and redo CABGs to determine whether this single approach is appropriate for both instances. Five hundred seventeen consecutive CABG patients were retrospectively reviewed. Four hundred fifty-four first-time CABG procedures were compared with 44 redo procedures. All aspects of the operation were identical including myocardial preservation. Retrospective univariant analysis of both groups followed. Three clinical features distinguished first-time versus redo CABG. These were previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (first-time 19% vs redo 71%; P < 0.001), preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (first-time 38% vs redo 71%; P < 0.001), and Parsonnet risk score (first-time 11.7 ± 8.2 vs redo 19.2 ± 8.8; P < 0.001). Operative mortality for redo CABG was higher than in first-time procedures (3.4% vs 6.4%; P = not significant), although small sample size limited statistical significance. The length of stay was statistically longer in redo patients (8.7 ± 10.8 vs 6.0 ± 5.1 days; P < 0.01) and is related to a higher Parsonnet score, increased postoperative pneumonia, and failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty before redo CABG. We conclude that redo CABG is a different operation from first-time procedures and requires enhanced myocardial preservation. Normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with cold blood maintenance cardioplegia does not appear to achieve this goal.

Rapid recovery protocol applied to 5,658 consecutive "on-pump" coronary bypass patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing hospital costs, restricted resources, and new surgical strategies have stimulated effectiveness of all routines in cardiac surgery. Over a 10-year period, 5,658 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting followed a protocol aiming at short postoperative intubation times and rapid physical rehabilitation.

METHODS

The patients were prepared for rapid recovery, emphasizing (1) preoperative education and respiratory training, (2) low-dose fentanyl anesthesia, (3) limited ischemic times and pump times, (4) mild hypothermia and rewarming to a rectal temperature of 36 degrees C, (5) restricted use of extended monitoring, (6) autologous blood salvage to avoid allogeneic blood transfusions, and (7) active physical training from postoperative day 1. All in-hospital data relevant to these steps were prospectively stored in a database.

RESULTS

The median extubation time after arrival in the intensive care unit was 1.5 hours (0 to 320 hours). More than 99% of the patients were extubated within 5 hours. Sixty-two patients (1.1%) were reintubated and ventilated for a median of 24 hours (1 to 430 hours), mostly due to resternotomy for bleeding or cardiopulmonary decompensation. In total, 5,594 patients (98.9%) were able to sit in a chair the first postoperative day. Within the fourth postoperative day, 82.5% were able to move freely in the hospital area and were in fact physically fit for hospital discharge. Allogeneic blood products were given to 3.9% of the patients. Twenty-three patients (0.41%) died in-hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

With the application of a protocol for rapid physical recovery in patients undergoing "on-pump" coronary artery bypass grafting, extubation within 1 to 2 hours was safe and feasible in most patients. After 5 hours, 99.3% of the patients were extubated, with a reintubation rate of 1.1%. More than 80% of the patients were fully physically mobile within 4 days after the operation.

Simplified Parsonnet risk scale identifies limits to early patient discharge

BACKGROUND

Fast-track recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery has influenced patient care positively. Predicting patients who fall off track and require prolonged (> or =7 days) hospitalization remains uncertain. The Parsonnet risk assessment score is effective in predicting length of stay, but is limited by inaccurate subdivision of risk categories. We simplified the Parsonnet risk scale to better identify patients eligible for fast-track recovery.

METHOD

The cases of 604 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were reviewed retrospectively. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced CPB time, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) criteria, and atrial fibrillation prophylaxis was applied to all patients. The five original divisions of the Parsonnet risk scale were reduced to three risk categories: Low (0-10; Group A), Intermediate (11-20; Group B), High (> 20; Group C). Comparisons of progressive risk categories were analyzed to identify predictive factors associated with fast-track outcomes.

RESULTS

The thirty-day operative mortality for the entire group was 3.6%. Three clinical features were identified that distinguished risk progression-female gender, reoperative CABG, and increased age. Additionally, the presence of diabetes (p < 0.05), congestive heart failure (p < 0.01), and peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001) distinguished Groups A and B, while acute myocardial infarction (p < 0.05) influenced outcomes in Group C. Group A (48%) mean risk score 5.9+/-3.2 was compared to Group B (34%) 14.8+/-2.6, which was further compared to Group C (18%) 26.4+/-2.8. The mean length of stay for Group A (5.3+/-4.1 days) was notably less than Group B (6.1+/-4.7 days; p < 0.05); however, both groups responded favorably to fast-track techniques. Group C did not respond comparably (9.2+/-9.2 vs 6.1+/-4.7 days; p < 0.001) and experienced prolonged recovery. The simplified Parsonnet risk scale did not identify differences in operative mortality and revealed only pneumonia (p < 0.05) and atrial fibrillation (p < 0.01) to be greater in Group C. As risk increased, significantly less revascularization was performed (Group A 3.6+/-1.2 grafts/patient vs Group B 3.3+/-1.2 [p < 0.01]; Group B 3.3+/-1.2 vs Group C 2.5+/-1.0 [p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

A simplified Parsonnet risk scale (three categories) is an effective tool in identifying factors limiting fast-track recovery. Low- and intermediate-risk patients represent the majority (82%) and respond well to fast-track methods. High-risk patients (18%) are limited by a greater percentage of female patients, reoperative CABG, and the very elderly, resulting in fast-track failure. Strategies to improve recovery in high-risk patients may include evolving off-pump techniques.

Initial Experience with Beating Heart Surgery: Comparison with Fast-Track Methods

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may increase postoperative complications in high-risk patients. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a series of consecutive patients undergoing conventional CABG using a fast-track recovery method and to compare this series with the initial series of patients undergoing beating heart surgery using either the single-vessel minimally invasive approach or the off-pump multivessel bypass technique with a median sternotomy. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent CABG. One hundred four patients underwent conventional CABG using CPB with a short-pump fast-track recovery method (Group A). Twenty-nine patients underwent a single-vessel bypass via a left anterior thoracotomy off pump [Group B, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)]. Twenty-five patients underwent multivessel CABG with a median sternotomy off pump (Group C). Short-pump fast-track (Group A) patients exhibited minimal complications and expedient recovery and received extensive revascularization. Off-pump multivessel patients (Group C) received fewer bypass grafts, had more preoperative comorbidity, and recovered as quickly as lower-risk fast-track short-pump patients (Group A). Single-vessel off-pump patients (Group B, MIDCAB) were younger elective patients and demonstrated no recovery advantage. The overall mortality was 1.8 per cent. The conversion rates from beating heart surgery to CPB for groups B and C were 10.3 and 16 per cent, respectively. The postoperative hospital length of stay for groups A, B, and C were 4.8 ± 2.4, 3.9 ± 1.8, and 5.2 ± 2.3 days, respectively. Eliminating CPB is not as important as reducing exposure for minimizing operative risk. Beating heart surgery is an adjunct to conventional CABG with CPB. The off-pump multivessel bypass technique is best suited for high-risk patients requiring three grafts or fewer, whereas MIDCAB is best suited for single-vessel bypass that cannot be managed using interventional percutaneous techniques; however, the recovery advantage with MIDCAB is not apparent. Patients requiring more than three bypass grafts should undergo conventional CABG with CPB.

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.

Ultra-fast track hospital discharge using conventional cardiac surgical techniques

BACKGROUND

Recent introduction of minimally invasive adult cardiac surgical techniques has emphasized the advantage of early hospital discharge. However, we chose an alternative approach to determine the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ultra-fast track protocols while retaining both standard surgical exposure (median sternotomy) and conventional cardiac surgical techniques (hypothermia, cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest, and optimal myocardial protection).

METHODS

From September 1995 to January 1998, a total of 258 consecutive patients underwent cardiac procedures by a single surgeon. Acceleration of clinical pathways was used to initiate earlier discharges. Stringent postdischarge follow-up was implemented. Prospectively entered data were then analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A variety of isolated as well as combined coronary and valve procedures were performed. Of the 258 patients operated on during this entire study period, a total of 144 patients (56%) were discharged within postoperative days 1 to 4 (ultra-fast track discharge). Over the past 12 months, this incidence increased to 70% (76 of 108 patients). Approximately 50% of these patients were operated on urgently or emergently. To date, there have been no deaths in this ultra-fast track group. There were eight brief readmissions, of which one was for rewiring of a noninfected sternal dehiscence, and the remaining were for cardiac diagnostic studies or a noncardiac problem altogether.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional cardiac operation can allow ultrafast hospital discharges while retaining the advantage of time-tested techniques and providing wider application without requiring new or additional training or equipment.