Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on transfusion risk in coronary bypass patients

Management of Perioperative Iron Deficiency in Cardiac Surgery: A Modified RAND Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, preoperative anemia has become recognized as a clinical condition in need of management. Although the etiology of preoperative anemia can be multifactorial, two-thirds of anemic elective surgical patients have iron deficiency anemia. At the same time, one-third of non-anemic elective surgical patients are also iron deficient.

METHODS

Modified-RAND Delphi methodology was employed to identify areas of consensus among an expert panel regarding the management of iron deficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A list of statements was sent to panel members to respond to using a five-point Likert Scale. All panel members subsequently attended a face-to-face meeting. The initial survey was presented and discussed, and panel members responded to each statement on the Likert scale again. Based on the second survey, the panel came to a consensus on recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel recommended all patients undergoing cardiac surgery be evaluated for iron deficiency, whether or not anemia is present. Evaluation should include iron studies and reticulocyte hemoglobin content. If iron deficiency is present, with or without anemia, patients should receive parenteral iron. Erythropoietin stimulating agents may be appropriate for some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus of an expert panel resulted in a standardized approach to diagnosing and managing iron deficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Evaluation of Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA) and Their Effect on Blood Optimization for Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular surgeries increase the risk of receiving blood transfusions. Erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used to decrease the transfusion rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the administration of blood products post-cardiothoracic surgery after receiving ESAs.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Between May 2017 to May 2018, 52 adult patients underwent cardiac surgery and received ESAs pre-operatively and/or post-operatively. A total of 35 patients were included in the study and 21 (60%) patients did not require a blood transfusion while 14 (40%) patients required a blood transfusion (p = 0.597). The change in hemoglobin (Hgb = 0.773 g/dL, 1.7 g/dL; p = 0.002) and hematocrit (Hct = 2.31%, 4.3%; p = 0.04) was significantly different in patients who received ESAs alone versus ESAs with blood transfusion. Adverse drug reactions showed no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, ESAs did not significantly reduce the need for blood transfusion. Future and larger studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of ESAs on blood transfusion.

Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

A Better Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: The Largest Area Under the Curve Below the Oxygen Delivery Threshold During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass for the largest area under the curve (AUC) below the oxygen delivery (DO₂) threshold and the cumulative AUC below the DO₂ threshold.

Methods and Results

From March 2017 to October 2019, 202 patients who had undergone cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled. The perfusion parameters were recorded every 20 seconds, and the DO₂ (10×pump flow index [L/min per m²]×[hemoglobin (g/dL)×1.36×arterial oxygen saturation (%)+partial pressure of arterial oxygen (mm Hg)×0.003]) threshold of 300 mL/min per m² was considered to define sufficient DO₂. The nadir DO₂, the cumulative AUC below the DO2300, and the largest AUC below the DO2300 were used to predict the incidence of AKI. Postoperative AKI was observed in 12.4% of patients (25/202). By multivariable analysis, the largest AUC below the DO2300 ≥880 (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% CI, 1.2–21.5 [P=0.022]), preoperative hemoglobin concentration ≤11.6 g/dL (OR, 7.6; 95% CI, 2.0–32.3 [P=0.004]), and red blood cell transfusions during cardiopulmonary bypass ≥2 U (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.0–11.1 [P=0.041]) were detected as independent risk factors for AKI. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the largest AUC below the DO2300 was more accurate to predict postoperative AKI compared with the nadir DO₂ and the cumulative AUC below the DO2300 (differences between areas, 0.0691 [P=0.006] and 0.0395 [P=0.001]).

Conclusions

These data suggest that a high AUC below the DO2300 is an important independent risk factor for AKI after cardiopulmonary bypass, which could be considered for risk prediction models of AKI.

Proceedings From the Society for Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting 2017: Management Dilemmas of the Surgical Patient-When Blood Is Not an Option

Vigilance is essential in the perioperative period. When blood is not an option for the patient, especially in a procedure/surgery that normally holds a risk for blood transfusion, complexity is added to the management. Current technology and knowledge has made avoidance of blood transfusion a realistic option but it does require a concerted patient-centered effort from the perioperative team. In this article, we provide suggestions for a successful, safe, and bloodless journey for patients. The approaches include preoperative optimization as well as intraoperative and postoperative techniques to reduce blood loss, and also introduces current innovative substitutes for transfusions. This article also assists in considering and maneuvering through the legal and ethical systems to respect patients' beliefs and ensuring their safety.

[Anemia in candidates for heart surgery]

Heart surgery patients have a high prevalence of anemia. Its etiology is multifactorial, and iron deficiency is one of the most common correctable causes. Anemia is an independent risk factor for postsurgical morbidity and mortality. It also predisposes patients to a greater need for transfusions, which increases the associated complications and the use of resources. The etiological diagnosis of anemia is no different from that of other surgical procedures, but the time available for correcting it before surgery is shorter. Studies have been conducted on therapeutic regimens with iron deficiency replenishment with total dose and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, which enable the rapid correction of anemia and reduce transfusion requirements. There is considerable variability in terms of dosage, adverse effects, administration time and routes, drug combinations and results. New studies are needed to investigate the most ideal regimens for correcting anemia in these patients.

The Safety and Efficacy of “Bloodless” Cardiac Surgery

Nearly 20% of blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. Despite the many blood conservation techniques that are available, safe, and efficacious for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, many of these operations continue to be associated with significant amounts of blood transfusion. Although surgical bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass is a common problem as reflected by the substantial use of blood products, it is the individual physician and institutional behavior that have been identified as reasons for transfusion and not necessarily patient comorbidity or blood loss. Transfusion rates in cardiac surgery remain high despite major advances in perioperative blood conservation, with large variations among individual centers. The adoption of available blood conservation techniques, either alone or in combination in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, could result in an estimated 75% reduction of unnecessary transfusions. The success of previously reported blood conservations programs in cardiac surgery should call for a reevaluation of allogeneic transfusion practices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. By applying the numerous reported blood conservation strategies for the management of patients presenting for cardiac surgery, we can preserve our dwindling blood resources and help alleviate some of the direct costs of blood as well as the indirect costs of treating noninfectious and infectious complications of transfusion.

Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery

Blood transfusion is the most common procedure in cardiac surgery. Increasing evidence exists that excess transfusions are harmful to patients. Transfusion reactions and complications, including infection, immune modulation, and lung injury, are known complications but underreported; hence, their significance is often disregarded. Furthermore, a number of randomized trials have shown that a restrictive transfusion strategy is equal to if not better than a liberal transfusion strategy. Despite the evidence for the use of restrictive transfusion triggers, its dissemination in the cardiac surgical community has met with resistance. In this review, we outline the risks of transfusion, compare restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies in cardiac surgery, and finally outline perioperative interventions to minimize transfusion in the cardiac surgical patient.

Prevalence of preoperative anaemia in patients having first-time cardiac surgery and its impact on clinical outcome. A retrospective observational study

The prevalence of anaemia is increasing globally. It has a close association with perioperative blood transfusion which, in turn, results in an increased risk of postoperative complications. Undesirable effects are not only limited to short-term, but also have long-term implications. Despite this, many patients undergo cardiac surgery with undiagnosed and untreated anaemia. We designed a retrospective, observational study to estimate the prevalence of anaemia in patients having cardiac surgery in Auckland District Health Board, blood transfusion rates and associated clinical outcome. Two hundred of seven hundred and twelve (28.1%) patients were anaemic. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates were significantly higher in the anaemic group compared to the non-anaemic group (160 (80%) vs. 192 (38%), p-value <0.0001, RR (CI 95%) 2.133 (1.870-2.433)). Transfusion rates for fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and platelets were also higher in the anaemic group. Anaemia was significantly associated with the development of new infection (14 (7%) vs. 15 (2.9%), p-value 0.0193, RR (CI 95%) 2.389 (1.175-4.859)), prolonged ventilation time (47.01 hours vs. 23.59 hours, p-value 0.0076) and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay (80.23 hours vs. 50.27, p-value 0.0011). Preoperative anaemia is highly prevalent and showed a clear link with significantly higher transfusion rates and postoperative morbidity. It is vital that a preoperative management plan for the correction of anaemia should be sought to improve patient safety and outcome.

Alternatives to blood transfusion

The use of alternatives to allogeneic blood continues to rest on the principles that blood transfusions have inherent risks, associated costs, and affect the blood inventory available for health-care delivery. Increasing evidence exists of a fall in the use of blood because of associated costs and adverse outcomes, and suggests that the challenge for the use of alternatives to blood components will similarly be driven by costs and patient outcomes. Additionally, the risk-benefit profiles of alternatives to blood transfusion such as autologous blood procurement, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and haemostatic agents are under investigation. Nevertheless, the inherent risks of blood, along with the continued rise in blood costs are likely to favour the continued development and use of alternatives to blood transfusion. We summarise the current roles of alternatives to blood in the management of medical and surgical anaemias.

Update in critical care for the nephrologist: transfusion in nonhemorrhaging critically ill patients

A growing number of guidelines and recommendations advocate a restrictive transfusion strategy. Strong evidence exists that a hemoglobin threshold of less than 7 g/dL conserves resources and may improve outcomes in critically ill patients and that platelet counts greater than 10,000/μL are well tolerated. Patients with coronary artery disease can be safely managed with a restrictive transfusion strategy, utilizing a hemoglobin threshold of less than 7 or 8 g/dL; a threshold of less than 8 g/dL can be applied to patients with acute coronary syndromes. In the absence of coagulopathy with bleeding or high risk for bleeding, plasma transfusion should be withheld. Complications from transfusion are significant and previously under-recognized immunologic complications pose a more serious threat than infections. Erythropoietin and iron administration do not reduce transfusion needs in the critically ill. Interventions to reduce blood loss and educate clinicians are successful in reducing transfusion requirements.

Safety of cardiac surgery without blood transfusion: a retrospective study in Jehovah's Witness patients

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the utilisation of blood products and outcomes following cardiac surgery for 123 Jehovah's Witnesses and 4219 non-Jehovah's Witness patient controls. The study took place over a 7-year period at the Amphia Hospital in Breda, the Netherlands. A specific protocol was used in the management of Jehovah's Witness patients, while the control group received blood without restriction according to their needs. Patients' characteristics were comparable in both groups. Pre-operatively, the mean (SD) Euro Score was higher in the Jehovah's Witness group (3.2 (2.6) vs 2.7 (2.5), respectively; p < 0.02). Pre-operative haemoglobin concentration was higher in the Jehovah's Witness group (8.9 (0.7) vs 8.6 (0.9) g.dl(-1), respectively; p < 0.001). The total cardiopulmonary bypass time did not differ between groups. The requirement for allogenic blood transfusion was 0% in the Jehovah's Witness group compared to 65% in the control group. Postoperatively, there was a lower incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction (2 (1.8%) vs 323 (7.7%), respectively; p < 0.02), and non Q-wave infarction (11 (9.8%) vs 559 (13.2%), respectively; p < 0.02) in the Jehovah's Witness group compared with controls. Mean (SD) length of stay in the intensive care unit (2.3 (3.2) vs 2.6 (4.2) days; p = 0.26), re-admission rate to the intensive care unit (5 (4.5%) vs 114 (2.7%); p = 0.163), and mortality (3 (2.7%) vs 65 (1.5%); p = 0.59), did not differ between the Jehovah's Witness and control groups, respectively.

Hemoglobin variability in chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The ability to maintain dialysis patients' hemoglobin (Hgb) within narrow targets remains a significant clinical problem. This study was designed to determine the variability in Hgb values for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving or not receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) compared with patients on dialysis receiving ESAs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional review of anemia management in CKD and dialysis patients analyzed Hgb variability by patient-year, defined as the coefficient of variability calculated for individual patients. One hundred thirty-seven CKD patient-years and 350 dialysis patient-years were available for analysis. Hgb variability was defined as the coefficient of variability calculated as the individual patient's Hgb standard deviation divided by the patient's mean Hgb times 100.

RESULTS

The coefficient of variability in Hgb values were significantly less in patients with CKD not treated with ESAs than in patients with CKD treated with ESAs whether they were receiving dialysis (medians: 3.96 versus 8.53%, P < 0.05) or not receiving dialysis (medians: 3.96 versus 7.37%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CKD and hemodialysis patients receiving treatment with ESAs have significantly greater Hgb variability than patients with CKD not receiving ESAs. This finding suggests that the current practice pattern for the administration of exogenous ESAs is partly responsible for the observed Hgb variability.

The Efficacy of Preoperative Administration of a Single Dose of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative autologous blood donation with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is effective in adults. However, there are problems concerning the blood access, cost, and blood storage in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of administering a single dose of rHuEPO without blood donation in children undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-two children (72 with noncyanotic heart disease, and 10 with cyanotic heart disease) whose hematocrit values were less than 45% were included in this prospective, nonrandomized study. The children were divided into 3 groups: group E0 (n = 20) was not treated with rHuEPO and iron sulfate; group E2 (n = 27) was treated with 200 IU/kg of rHuEPO and 2 mg/kg of iron sulfate; and group E4 (n = 35) was treated with 400 IU/kg of rHuEPO and 4 mg/kg of iron sulfate. Administration of rHuEPO was performed subcutaneously 7 days before the operation. The hematological and iron parameters were measured perioperatively.

RESULTS

A lower proportion of children treated with rHuEPO (group E2, 14.8%; group E4, 22.9%) than children without rHuEPO (group E0, 40.0%) were exposed to RBC transfusions; however, there was no significance. The elevations of the hematocrit levels were 0.7% in group E0, 1.3% in group E2, and 1.9% in group E4. The elevation of the hematocrit was greater in patients with anemia (hematocrit < or =37%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the effectiveness for avoiding transfusion was not clear, the administration of a single dose of rHuEPO without autologous blood donations had an effect by increasing hematocrit levels.

Does the Use of Erythropoietin Reduce the Risk of Exposure to Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of blood conservation techniques is important in cardiac surgery as postoperative bleeding is common and allogeneic blood transfusion carries the risk of transfusion reactions and infection transmission. Erythropoietin with and without preoperative autologous blood donation is one of the modalities to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of erythropoietin in reducing the risk of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion during or after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 11 identified randomized controlled trials, reporting comparisons between erythropoietin and control, was undertaken. The primary outcome was the number of patients exposed to allogeneic blood transfusion during or after cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, involving 708 patients, met the inclusion criteria for this review. In total, 471 patients were given erythropoietin, and 237 patients formed the control group. The administration of erythropoietin with and without preoperative autologous blood transfusion prior to cardiac surgery is associated with a significant risk reduction: RR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.18-0.44, P < 0.001) and RR = 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.88, P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The administration of erythropoietin before cardiac surgery is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion. Further studies are warranted to define the patients' subgroups that may benefit the most from EPO administration.

Autologous blood transfusion in elective cardiac valve operations

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY

The aim of this study was to detect any outcome differences between patients who donated autologous blood versus nondonors undergoing nonemergent cardiac valve surgery. Of further interest was whether autologous donors required less allogeneic blood products overall than patients who did not donate.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study in which data were collected prospectively on 225 variables. Cases underwent nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery and donated autologous blood products (n = 40). Controls also had nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery but did not donate autologous blood products (n = 120). Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on age (+/-3 years), gender, and New York Heart Association Functional Classification. We controlled for 12 potential confounding variables and examined 17 outcomes of interest. To generate the unadjusted risks of each outcome, chi-square and t-tests were performed comparing cases and controls to each outcome of interest. Then logistic regression analysis investigated the adjusted risk between cases and controls and for the outcomes of interest, each controlling for the potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the cases and controls for 11 of the 12 possible confounding variables. Controls had significantly more chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for 13 of the 17 outcomes of interest. Autologous blood donors received more total packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (p = 0.0373) and more total fresh frozen plasma than controls (p = 0.0002). Fewer autologous blood donors required allogeneic packed red blood cell transfusion (p = 0.0134), and the total length of stay was shorter for autologous donors (p = 0.0782).

CONCLUSION

Four of the 17 outcomes of interest were different for patients who donated autologous blood versus those who did not. Our experience demonstrated that elective cardiac valve surgery can safely reduce (by 18.3%) the need for allogeneic PRBCs by utilizing preoperative autologous blood donation.

Autologous Blood Donation in Cardiac Surgery: Reduction of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion and Cost-Effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with and without autologous blood donation and to calculate the costs of predonation from the hospital perspective.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Four thousand three hundred twenty-five patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with and without autologous blood donation.

INTERVENTIONS

Eight hundred forty-nine patients (20%) underwent autologous blood donation, whereas 3,476 (80%) did not. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion was recorded as the primary endpoint. To avoid selection bias, patients were stratified according to their preoperative risk score. A decision model was derived from acquired data for the optimization of autologous blood donation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Allogeneic blood transfusion rate was 13% in patients with predonation versus 48% without predonation (p < 0.05). This difference remained statistically significant even after risk stratification. The predonation of 1, 2, or 3 units reduced the probability of receiving allogeneic blood to 24%, 14%, and 9%, respectively. An efficient program of predonation within the department of anesthesiology allowed keeping the costs of predonation low. Decision-tree analysis revealed that predonation of 2 autologous units of blood saved the most allogeneic blood for the smallest increase in costs. Incremental cost for male patients predonating 2 units was dollars 33 (US), whereas for females predonation could be done at no extra cost in comparison to patients without predonation.

CONCLUSION

Autologous blood donation significantly reduces allogeneic blood requirement in cardiac surgery. If adjusted for diagnosis and gender, autologous blood donation is a cost-effective alternative to reduce allogeneic blood consumption.

Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: Conventional Surgery versus Bloodless Surgery

Bleeding during and after cardiac operations and the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass hemodilution commonly result in blood transfusions. Excessive microvascular bleeding can result in re-exploration and prolonged hospitalization. Nearly 20% of all blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. The risks associated with the use of allogeneic blood product transfusion include mistransfusion, immunologic complications, and transmission of infectious diseases. The large demand for blood products places significant pressure on the national blood supply, resulting in frequent shortages. The variability in transfusion practice of cardiac surgery patients suggests that sound blood management and a conservative approach to this population can result in reduced transfusions without increasing morbidity or mortality and avoiding complications associated with allogeneic blood transfusion.

Blood Transfusion Issues in the Critically Ill

Anemia is a common clinical problem seen in the critically ill and results in a large RBC transfusion requirement for these patients. The view that RBC transfusion is risk-free is no longer tenable today. There is the accumulating evidence that allogeneic blood transfusion is immunosuppressive. More reently, attention has focused on the age of RBCs transfused. Transfused RBCs, especially during the time period immeditely following transfusion, are not normal. The duration of RBC storage may be an important determinant of the efficacy of RBCs as oxygen carriers as well as a determinant of transusion related morbidity. Adding to the controversy about risk/benefit ratio for RBC transfusion are recent data showing that an aggressive RBC transfusion strategy may decrease the likelihood of survival in selected subpopulations of critically ill adults. The optimal hematocrit for the ICU patient remains to be determined. It seems clear that hemoglobin levels falling significantly below the “10/30” threshold can be tolerated. However, it is not clear that this is applicable to the critically ill ICU patient population. Therefore, while hemoglobin levels in the 7-10 mg/dL range are well tolerated in the “stable” “nontressed” patient, this range might not be optimal for the critcally ill patient. Conservative transfusion thresholds as well as strategies to minimize loss of blood and increase the producion of RBCs are important in the management of critically ill patients.

Perioperative use of erythropoietin

Erythropoietin (EPO) is the primary regulator of red blood cell (RBC) production, and hypoxia is the main stimulus for EPO secretion. Increases in circulating levels of EPO are proportionate to the levels of tissue hypoxia, which are influenced by hematocrit (HCT). Small decreases in HCT as would be typical after presurgical autologous blood donation often do not result in increased EPO levels or in compensatory erythropoiesis. Erythropoiesis may also be limited by deficiencies of vitamin B(12), folate, and, most commonly, iron. The preoperative administration of EPO is effective in increasing erythrocyte mass and autologous donation volumes while maintaining higher HCT levels. In some surgical populations, particularly those individuals who experience surgical blood losses in excess of 2 L, EPO treatment also reduces allogeneic blood exposure. This effect is prominent in patients with a low initial HCT. Current assessments of the cost-effectiveness of EPO suggest that it achieves little overall improvement in patient health and that what improvement it does offer, it does at enormous cost.

The effects of epoetin alfa on transfusion requirements in head and neck cancer patients: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO, epoetin alfa) in stimulating hematopoiesis and reducing allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in major head and neck cancer surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients undergoing surgical resection of head and neck tumors at the University of Iowa hospitals completed this study. Patients were required to have a pre-study hemoglobin >/=10.0 g/dL and </=13.5 g/dL. Group 1 (29 patients) received three doses of 600 IU/kg epoetin alfa before surgery. Group 2 (29 patients) received a placebo. All patients received oral iron supplementation (150 mg FeSO4 twice per day).

RESULTS

The epoetin alfa group demonstrated a significant increase in baseline to day-of-surgery mean hemoglobin (0.57 g/dL, P =.016), hematocrit (2.04%, P =.015), and reticulocyte count (95.3 x 103 cells/mm3, P = <.001), whereas there was no significant change in these hematologic variables in the placebo group. The percent of patients who avoided transfusion in the epoetin alfa group was 34.5% versus 17.2% in the placebo group. Patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusions received an average of 3.16 units in the epoetin alfa group and 4.12 units in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

In this single institution study, we demonstrated a significant improvement in hematopoietic parameters and a trend toward decreased transfusion requirements using perioperative epoetin alfa in a head and neck cancer patient population. Further studies may delineate additional benefits in treating qualified patients with epoetin alfa during therapy for head and neck malignancies.

Recombinant human erythropoietin administration in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative anemia and multiple blood transfusions are still important problems in cardiac surgery. During the past few years, there have been some reports indicating that multiple recombinant human erythropoietin infusions starting at least 2 weeks before the operation induced erythropoiesis. We aimed to reduce the risk of adverse reactions of high doses of recombinant human erythropoietin and reduce the period of hospitalization by using it only once, 4 days before the operation.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients received recombinant human erythropoietin 4 days before the operation, and 28 patients comprised the control group. All the hematologic parameters of the patients are measured on the day of admission, the day before the operation (fourth day), the first day after the operation, and 1 week later.

RESULTS

In the recombinant human erythropoietin group the mean hemoglobin concentration increased on the morning of the operation (14.5 +/- 0.52 g/dL in the recombinant human erythropoietin group and 12.4 +/- 0.65 in the control group, P <.05). To maintain hemoglobin levels at greater than 8.5 g/dL, 330 +/- 33 mL of homologous transfusion was required in the recombinant human erythropoietin group, whereas 680 +/- 75 mL was required in the control group (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Recombinant human erythropoietin induces erythropoiesis rapidly, even when it is used with a low single dose just 4 days before the operation. No adverse reactions were seen with this kind of recombinant human erythropoietin treatment.

Transfusion medicine : support of patients undergoing cardiac surgery

There is still no alternative that is as effective or as well tolerated as blood; nevertheless, the search for ways to conserve, and even eliminate blood transfusion, continues. Based on hemoglobin levels, practice guidelines for the use of perioperative transfusion of red blood cells in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting have been formulated by the National Institutes of Health and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. However, it has been argued that more physiologic indicators of adequacy of oxygen delivery should be used to assess the need for blood transfusion. Methods used for conserving blood during surgery include autologous blood donation, acute normovolemic hemodilution and intra- and postoperative blood recovery and reinfusion. The guidelines for the use of autologous blood transfusion are controversial and it does not appear to be cost effective compared with allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Similarly, the cost effectiveness of intra- and postoperative blood recovery and reinfusion need further evaluation. Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) remains unapproved in the US for patients undergoing cardiac or vascular surgery, but it is a valuable adjunct in Jehovah's Witness patients, for whom blood is unacceptable. The characterization of darbepoetin alfa, a novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein with a 3-fold greater plasma elimination half-life compared with rhEPO, is an important advance in this field. Darbepoetin alfa appears to be effective in treating the anemia in patients with renal failure or cancer and trials in patients with surgical anemia are planned. Desmopressin has been used to effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss. Topical agents to prevent blood loss, such as fibrin glue and fibrin gel, and agents that alter platelet function, such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or dipyridamole, need further evaluation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Aprotinin has been shown to preserve hemostasis and reduce allogeneic blood exposure to a greater extent than the antifibrinolytic agents tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid. Controlled clinical trials comparing the costs of these agents with clinical outcomes, along with tolerability profiles in patients at risk for substantial perioperative bleeding are needed.

Cost-effectiveness of epoetin and autologous blood donationin reducing allogeneic blood transfusions incoronary artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery accounts for a substantial portion of all allogeneic units of blood transfused. Drugs and autologous blood donation (ABD) are alternative or adjunctive methods for reducing complications and costs induced by allogeneic blood transfusions. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) has the potential to decrease perioperative need for allogeneic blood during CABG, but its high cost calls for a careful economic evaluation before it can be recommended for widespread use.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A decision tree was used to compare a hypothetical strategy of no epoetin with one in which epoetin was utilized to control blood transfusion needs in CABG; each strategy was tested with and without ABD. The impact of these strategies on both the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs ($US) was calculated.

RESULTS

Using epoetin alone and with ABD, respectively, avoided the transfusion of 0.61 and 1.35 units of allogeneic blood per patient and saved 0.000086 and 0.000146 QALYs per patient. This made cost-effectiveness (CE) higher than $7 million and $5 million for each QALY saved, respectively. ABD alone cost more than $1 million per QALY saved. If the risk of bacterial infections following allogeneic transfusions was included in the model, epoetin alone cost $6288 per QALY saved, while ABD, both alone and with epoetin, saved money.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the existing evidence, neither of the blood-saving strategies modeled was a cost-effective means of avoiding the deleterious health effects of perioperative blood transfusions in CABG. However, if allogeneic blood-related infections were to be considered, both ABD and epoetin would be acceptable interventions.

Erythropoietin to minimize perioperative blood transfusion: a systematic review of randomized trials. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators

Our aim was to perform a systematic review to determine the efficacy and side-effects of erythropoietin, given with or without autologous predonation, to patients undergoing orthopaedic or cardiac surgery. A number of studies have been done to determine whether erythropoietin minimizes exposure to perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion. A systematic review of all randomized trials will provide the best estimate of the efficacy and side-effects of erythropoietin therapy. All randomized trials of erythropoietin in cardiac or orthopaedic surgery that reported the proportion of patients receiving perioperative allogeneic transfusion were included. The efficacy of erythropoietin was evaluated in subgroups of patients depending upon the route of administration, dose of erythropoietin, the type of control and the methodological quality of the study report. The odds ratio for the proportion of patients transfused with allogeneic blood in studies of erythropoietin to augment autologous donation was 0.42 (95% confidence limits 0.28-0.62; P < 0.0001) for orthopaedic surgery and 0.25 (95% CI 0.08-0.82; P = 0.02) for cardiac surgery. The odds ratio for erythropoietin alone was 0.36 (95% CI 0.24-0.56; P = 0.0001) in orthopaedic surgery and 0.25 (95% CI 0.06-1.04; P < 0.06) in cardiac surgery. The route of administration, dose of erythropoietin, type of control and methodological quality of the study report had no statistically significant effect upon the odds ratios. Although there was no convincing evidence that erythropoietin used alone increased the frequency of thrombotic complications, some studies found an excess of events in erythropoietin-treated patients, and the number of patients studied was relatively small. Erythropoietin, when given alone or to augment autologous donation, decreased exposure to perioperative allogeneic transfusion in orthopaedic and cardiac surgery. Further studies are required to definitively establish the safety of erythropoietin alone, to determine the optimal dose of perioperative erythropoietin, and to compare its efficacy and cost-effectiveness with other methods of minimizing perioperative transfusion.

Erythropoietin therapy in the perioperative setting

Recombinant human erythropoietin has been approved for use in patients undergoing autologous donation in Japan, Europe, and Canada since 1993, 1994, and 1996, respectively, and for perisurgical adjuvant therapy without autologous donation in Canada and the United States since 1996. Early clinical trials of erythropoietin therapy in the setting of autologous donation have provided important information regarding clinical safety, erythropoietin dose, and erythropoietic response. Later trials of perisurgical erythropoietin therapy without autologous donation provided data on efficacy (reduced allogeneic blood exposure) that led to approval of erythropoietin in patients undergoing surgery. However, the erythropoietin doses (300 U/kg subcutaneous x14 days) used in these trials, and their subsequent inclusion in labeling for the use of this product, are costly and tedious to administer. A recent study reported that a weekly regimen of erythropoietin (600 U/kg) for 4 weeks is less costly but just as effective at reducing allogeneic blood exposure in elective orthopaedic surgery. The most cost effective regimen that has been shown to minimize allogeneic exposure is preoperative erythropoietin therapy (600 U/kg subcutaneous weekly x2 and 300 U/kg subcutaneous on day of surgery) coupled with acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. A similar regimen of erythropoietin therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (2500 U/kg subcutaneous in divided doses for 2 weeks preoperatively) coupled with hemodilution also was effective. Low dose erythropoietin therapy coupled with acute normovolemic hemodilution ultimately may be shown to be cost equivalent to the predonation of three autologous blood units before elective surgery.