Beating heart operations including hybrid revascularization: initial experiences

Feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation combining off-pump coronary surgery through J-hemisternotomy with percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

To assess the procedural feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation, combining off-pump left internal mammary artery grafting to the left descending coronary artery (LAD) through an inferior J-hemisternotomy (JOPCAB) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-LAD lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease involving LAD were included in this prospective registry. Hybrid revascularisation was performed by JOPCAB, either prior to PCI (89%) or following PCI (11%). In 96% of the cases, the procedure was carried out according to the preoperative strategy and without perioperative (24 hours) major adverse cardiac or cerebral events. At one month, we observed no deaths, one stroke and two procedure-related myocardial infarctions. Five patients underwent reoperation for graft dysfunction, four of whom were identified by angiography without prior signs of ischaemia. Reoperation due to bleeding was necessary in six patients, and nine patients received red blood cell transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective registry documented promising procedural feasibility and early safety of coronary hybrid revascularisation combining JOPCAB with PCI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01496664.

The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives

Over the past decade, minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery (MICS) has grown in popularity. This growth has been driven, in part, by a desire to translate many of the observed benefits of minimal access surgery, such as decreased pain and reduced surgical trauma, to the cardiac surgical arena. Initial enthusiasm for MICS was tempered by concerns over reduced surgical exposure in highly complex operations and the potential for prolonged operative times and patient safety. With innovations in perfusion techniques, refinement of transthoracic echocardiography and the development of specialized surgical instruments and robotic technology, cardiac surgery was provided with the necessary tools to progress to less invasive approaches. However, much of the early literature on MICS focused on technical reports or small case series. The safety and feasibility of MICS have been demonstrated, yet questions remain regarding the relative efficacy of MICS over traditional sternotomy approaches. Recently, there has been a growth in the body of published literature on MICS long-term outcomes, with most reports suggesting that major cardiac operations that have traditionally been performed through a median sternotomy can be performed through a variety of minimally invasive approaches with equivalent safety and durability. In this article, we examine the technological advancements that have made MICS possible and provide an update on the major areas of cardiac surgery where MICS has demonstrated the most growth, with consideration of current and future directions.

Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization—Review and Update 2007

Hybrid coronary revascularization is a combination of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The concept is now 10 years old. Implementation was slow, but major developments have taken place. The surgical part of the procedure can be performed in a totally endoscopic fashion instead of by a mini-incision approach and catheter-based intervention includes the use of drug-eluting stents. Whereas during early development staged approaches were taken, simultaneous interventions have become feasible. Hybrid procedures are an attractive option for high-risk patients or for patients who seek a less traumatic revascularization option.

Treatment of double vessel coronary artery disease by totally endoscopic bypass surgery and drug-eluting stent placement in one simultaneous hybrid session

Hybrid coronary artery revascularization is a combination of minimally invasive coronary artery surgery and catheter-based coronary intervention. Hybrid procedures enable adequate revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease without complete opening of the chest and with the advantage of the most durable option, a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft is placed to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. The hybrid concept is gaining renewed interest because totally endoscopic LIMA to LAD placement has become feasible and because drug-eluting stents in non-LAD targets may be competitive even for arterial bypass grafts. Simultaneous hybrid procedures would be desirable. We report on a case in which robotic totally endoscopic LIMA to LAD grafting using the da Vinci telemanipulation system was combined with placement of a rapamycin coated stent to the right coronary artery in one single procedure.

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention following coronary artery bypass graft--a descriptive analysis of the changing interface between interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon

BACKGROUND

Despite decreasing rates of acute and subacute complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), these procedures are generally only performed in centers where it is possible for failed PCI to be treated by rescue coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Case reports and case series have documented successful PCI following failed CABG. We sought to confirm this decrease in the need for rescue CABG following failed PCI and to examine trends in the utilization of rescue PCI following failed CABG.

HYPOTHESIS

The interface between interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon is characterized by changing practice patterns and resource utilization.

METHODS

We examined the medical records of all patients admitted to the Brigham and Women's Hospital over a 7-year period and identified 169 patients who required both PCI and CABG during the same hospital admission. We describe and compare three predetermined groups of patients defined by the sequence of, and indication for, the relevant myocardial revascularization procedures.

RESULTS

In all, 100 patients required CABG for failed PCI, 46 patients had planned hybrid procedures involving both CABG and PCI, and 23 patients required PCI following failed CABG. There was a decrease in the need for rescue CABG following failed PCI, both in total numbers and as a percentage of total cases (2.5% in 1994 and 0.22% in 1999). There was a simultaneous increase in the utilization of rescue PCI following failed CABG (0% in 1994 and 1.6% in 2000). Hybrid procedures were identified as a source of innovative solutions to a variety of challenging clinical problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Changing patterns of resource utilization should be considered when planning hospital facilities and patient triage, and these patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization may benefit from close cooperation between the cardiac surgeon and the interventional cardiologist.

Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) coupled with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a second coronary artery has been investigated in patients with multivessel disease to provide a minimally invasive therapeutic option.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TECAB of the LAD was performed using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA). A second lesion was treated with PCI before surgery, simultaneously, or after surgery. Three-month angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients and was subject to independent review. A total of 27 patients requiring double vessel revascularization were treated at 7 centers. Eleven patients underwent PCI before surgery, 12 patients underwent PCI after surgery, and 4 patients underwent simultaneous surgical and percutaneous intervention. Ten patients (37%) were treated with bare metal stents, whereas 17 patients (63%) were treated with drug-eluting stents. Postoperative angiographic evaluation demonstrated an overall LIMA anastomotic patency of 96.3% and PCI vessel patency of 66.7%. There were no deaths or strokes. One patient experienced a perioperative myocardial infarction. Eight of 27 patients (29.6%) required reintervention, 1 LIMA anastomotic stenosis (3.7%), 3 after bare metal stent (30%), and 4 after drug-eluting stent placement (23.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated revascularization treatment plans provide minimally invasive options for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This approach may be accomplished with no mortality, low perioperative morbidity, and excellent angiographic LIMA patency. The reintervention rate after PCI in this series was higher than that reported elsewhere and should be investigated further. The choice of suitable vessel, type of stent and timing of the treatment must be carefully considered before implementing this hybrid strategy.

Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization: Logistics and Program Development

Planning hybrid coronary artery revascularization--a combination of cardiac surgery with percutaneous procedures--requires, at first sight, a very complex logistical setup. Technical and equipment related details should be defined as early as possible in order to have time for training of all OR personnel involved. The most challenging aspect in OR-located hybrid coronary revascularization remains a very close cooperation of cardiac surgeons and interventional cardiologists. This teamwork does include indication findings and subsequent referral of multivessel coronary artery disease patients to hybrid procedures, as well as high individual flexibility of interventionalists and surgeons. The major prerequisite for this cooperation is a mutual acceptance of different revascularization approaches and the intent to combine their most striking advantages. Intraoperative graft angiography during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures is one important step toward simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization procedures. We describe our experience with on table angiography using a mobile C-arm for intraoperative imaging. This fluoroscopy system can in selected cases be used for simultaneous hybrid procedures.

Transcatheter techniques in the management of perioperative vascular obstruction

The role of transcatheter intervention for the treatment of vascular obstruction is well documented in the preoperative or remote postoperative settings. More recently, the roles of angioplasty and stent implantation have been advocated as intraoperative and immediate postoperative strategies. As one considers the inherent advantages in this cooperative approach to congenital heart disease, the development of a truly hybrid interventional suite seems imperative.

Perfusion-assisted beating heart support with a miniature extracorporeal circuit and leukocyte filtration: a 58-year-old patient with severe COPD

Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) impose a significant risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality requiring cardiovascular surgical intervention and the use of extracorporeal circulation. Recently, we treated a 58-year-old male with acute coronary syndrome complicated with recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, hypoxemia secondary to severe COPD and resolving pneumonia, who required urgent coronary revascularization. A novel operative strategy was used that included beating heart bypass grafting with cardiac decompression and support with a miniature perfusion circuit, kinetic-assisted venous return, rapid autologous priming and leukocyte filtration. The combination of multiple modalities was chosen because the patient was in a pre-existing inflammatory condition and had severe COPD. We herein report our perioperative clinical experience with this patient and the use of multiple modalities for extracorporeal perfusion therapy in managing this challenging case. We believe that, based upon his clinical course of ventilation time (17.4 hours) and postoperative length of hospital stay (5 days), this high risk patient demonstrated a positive clinical outcome as a result of these techniques.

Coronary hybrid revascularization from January 1997 to January 2001: a clinical follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hybrid revascularization (HyR), combining minimally invasive left internal mammary artery (LIMA) bypass grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and catheter interventional treatment of the remaining coronary lesions, avoids the disadvantages associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We investigated the clinical follow-up of 57 patients with multivessel disease undergoing this procedure in the last 4 years.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and January 2001, 57 consecutive patients (41 men and 16 women, aged 65.7 +/- 7.9 years) with coronary artery disease (two-vessel, n = 34; three-vessel, n = 23) were treated with off-pump LIMA-to-LAD bypass combined with balloon angioplasty and stenting of the remaining significantly obstructed (> 50%) coronary vessels. Clinical follow-up data included a early postoperative and a 6-month control angiography and a patient interview in January 2001.

RESULTS

All patients underwent LIMA-to-LAD bypass-grafting and balloon angioplasty in 72 coronary lesions without procedural-related complications. However, one early LIMA bypass occlusion was documented during coronary angiography. Postoperatively no deterioration of preexistent organ dysfunction was observed in any patient. The mean follow-up was 100.7 +/- 37.9 weeks in 55 of 57 patients (97%). Control angiography 6 months after HyR (n = 34) revealed a patent LIMA bypass in 33 patients and 8 in-stent restenoses (> 50%) in the coronary arteries that were treated interventionally by re-PTCA (n = 6) or by conventional CABG (n = 1). In 1 patient medical treatment resulted in significant reduction of angina so no further intervention was considered necessary. After HyR 1 patient died 18 months later of an intracerebral hemorrhage. All other patients are alive and doing well.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that in selected patients with multivessel disease including left main stem stenosis HyR is an effective and secure procedure with excellent early and good midterm results. Especially elderly patients with severe concomitant diseases appear to benefit from this approach by avoiding CPB.

Conversion to off-pump coronary bypass without increased morbidity or change in practice

BACKGROUND

This article examines the feasibility of complete conversion from conventional coronary artery operation to routine off-pump coronary bypass operation.

METHODS

Data on our first 285 off-pump procedures using the Octopus system (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) represent our learning curve. This is a complete experience in coronary bypass surgery over 16 months.

RESULTS

The cohort was nonselected. All patients had at least two-vessel disease. Eight hundred seven grafts were performed (mean, 2.8 per patient) of which 647 grafts (84%) were arterial (mean, 2.3 per patient). One hundred seventy nine patients (63%) underwent total arterial revascularization. Eight patients required cardiopulmonary bypass; all other operations were completed off-pump. Complications were: mortality, 3 patients (1.5%); renal failure, 24 patients (8%); stroke, 2 patients (< 1%); and atrial fibrillation, 60 patients (21%). The morbidity data and frequency of arterial grafting did not differ from that of 355 patients who underwent coronary bypass operations in a preceding 18-month period.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete shift from routine use of cardiopulmonary bypass to nonselective off-pump coronary bypass operation is possible with a low conversion rate and without an apparent increase in morbidity or change in technique. Whereas short-term safety and efficacy seem certain, studies of long-term outcome are necessary before the eventual role of off-pump coronary bypass in myocardial revascularization can be defined.

Hybrid revascularization feasibility in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed early and midterm outcome of 11 multivessel-disease acute coronary syndrome patients treated by hybrid revascularization, i.e., initial coronary angioplasty followed by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. We evaluated procedural efficacy and applicability.

METHODS

Beginning in August 1997, hybrid revascularization was conducted in 11 multivessel-disease acute coronary syndrome patients--9 men and 2 women with a mean age of 70.3 +/- 9.3 years. Occlusion or stenosis of the target coronary artery was treated by interventional cardiologic techniques and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting, and the early and midterm outcome evaluated. Coronary angiography was conducted in all cases at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 3 years postoperatively to evaluate anastomosis and restenosis in treated coronary vessels.

RESULTS

Initial intervention succeeded in patients with minimal residual stenosis. Subsequent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting involved no complications. Coronary angiography early postoperatively, 6 months, 1 and 3 years later showed grafts patent without stenosis. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was reconducted on restenotic lesions in 3 patients, 1 of whom required 3 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid revascularization appears safe and effective in coronary revascularization, at least over the short term. Several patients underwent angioplasty for restenosis within 3 years after initial procedure. Overall acceptance of this hybrid method depends on long-term functional success of the 2 procedures. Its major limitation is restenosis of angioplasty sites and the need for repeat procedures.

Minimal access aortic root, valve, and complex ascending aortic surgery

We report our entire experience with minimal access aortic root, valve, and complex ascending aortic surgery. A total of 290 consecutive patients underwent aortic root, valve, and ascending aortic surgery between July 1996 and February 2000. Four groups were identified: isolated aortic valve replacement (AV group, n = 227), aortic root replacement (AR group, n = 44), aortic valve replacement with concomitant replacement of the supracoronary ascending aorta (V/A group, n = 9), and isolated ascending aortic replacement (AA group, n = 10). The procedures were performed through a partial upper hemisternotomy (87%) or a right parasternal approach (13%). Overall mortality was 3.1% (n = 7) for the AV group, 2.3% (n = 1) for the AR group, 0% for the V/A group, and 10.0% (n = 1) for the AA group. Complications included reoperation for bleeding in 10 (4.5%), two (4.7%), one (11.1%), and one (11.1%) for the four groups respectively; and sternal wound infection in eight (3.6%) patients of the AV group and one (2.3%) patient of the AR group. Five (2.3%) patients of the AV group suffered stroke. Isolated or more complicated aortic valve, root and ascending aortic surgery is feasible and safe through a minimally invasive approach with acceptable incidence of complications and mortality, without compromising the efficacy of the procedure.

A xiphoid approach for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

The premise for adopting minimally invasive cardiac surgery techniques for myocardial revascularization is to reduce the patient's morbidity without compromising the efficacy of conventional coronary artery bypass. However, opening the pleura has been a limitation of using these approaches.

AIM

We used the xiphoid approach as an alternative to opening the pleura and to minimize pain after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

We review our surgical experience in 55 patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery through a xiphoid approach between October 1997 and August 1999. Thoracoscopy (n = 31) or direct vision (n = 24) were used for internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting. Mean patient age was 67 +/- 10 years and 65% were men. The mean Parsonnet score was 23 +/- 10. Performed anastomoses included left IMA (LIMA) to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery (n = 53), LIMA-to-LAD and saphenous vein graft from the LIMA to the right coronary artery (n = 1), and LIMA-to-LAD and right IMA (RIMA) to right coronary artery (n = 1).

RESULTS

Postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation (12%), acute noninfectious pericarditis (12%), and acute renal failure (5%). Mean postoperative length of stay was 4 +/- 2 days. Angiography was performed in 16 patients and demonstrated excellent patency of the anastomoses. There was no operative mortality. Actuarial survival was 98% in a mean follow-up period of 11 +/- 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass can be performed safely through a xiphoid approach with low morbidity, mortality, and a relatively short hospital stay.

Coronary artery bypass grafting following substernal gastric interposition

A 61-year-old man who had undergone substernal esophagogastric anastomosis for reconstruction after esophageal cancer, developed unstable angina 9 years later. Complete revascularization for triple-vessel disease was performed via a left thoracotomy approach under cardiopulmonary bypass. The successful results show that complete revascularization can be performed via this approach.

Role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with malignant neoplastic disease

Although the long-term benefits of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are obvious, postoperative morbidity and mortality and the length of recovery associated with cardiopulmonary bypass are the main concerns of cardiac surgeons and cardiologists. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of the off-pump CABG for patients with concomitant malignant disorders requiring myocardial revascularization. From March 1997 to February 1999, 51 patients underwent off-pump CABG. Of these, there were 9 patients who had concomitant malignant disease requiring noncardiac surgery: gastric cancer (4), urinary bladder cancer (2), cholangioma (1), lung cancer (1) and colon cancer (1). Off-pump CABG was performed through a sternotomy, left thoracotomy or subxiphoid incision. Five patients received single grafting and 4 received double. The mean operative time for the off-pump CABG was 167 min. The total amount of bleeding during the off-pump CABG was 450-890 ml. Simultaneous noncardiac operations were carried out in 5 patients. The other 4 patients underwent subsequent operations for the malignancy uneventfully. In contrast, of the 4 patients with concomitant malignant disorders who underwent standard CABG during the period before the use of off-pump CABG, 2 died without undergoing the subsequent noncardiac operation. Off-pump CABG is quite efficient and is of great advantage in patients with malignancy who require myocardial revascularization in addition to noncardiac surgery for the cancer.

Current status and future directions of minimally invasive cardiac surgery

The impetus to reduce the trauma of surgery witnessed over the past decade in all fields of surgery has recently extended into the cardiac surgical arena; however, unlike other specialties, the invasiveness of cardiac surgery can be reduced by limiting the size of incisions and by avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. This article reviews the rationale, clinical experience, and outcomes of the minimally invasive approaches to cardiac surgery that have evolved over the past 2 years and glimpses into the future of this rapidly evolving field.