Biological and psychological processes in recovery from depression during cognitive therapy

Post-awakening salivary alpha-amylase as modulator of treatment response in patients with burnout and major depression

Around 50% of patients with major depression do not respond to standard first-line treatments, such as psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. At the same time, a subgroup exhibits altered functioning of stress-responsive bodily systems, such as the central locus coeruleus/sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Given that these systems impact arousal and cognition, it is possible that this subgroup contributes to the high rates of non-responders. Our aim was to investigate whether sympathetic and HPA axis activity modulate treatment outcomes in patients with stress-related major depression. A total of N = 74 inpatients (median age: 50, 62% male) with signs of burnout who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for major depression were recruited. Saliva samples were collected at awakening as well as 30 and 45 min later. Alpha-amylase activity and cortisol concentrations were determined before patients underwent evidence-based multimodal treatment. Non-responders were defined as patients exhibiting a <50% decrease in depression on the Beck Depression Inventory. Non-responders had significantly higher post-awakening alpha-amylase activity than responders (p = .025). In addition, alpha-amylase activity increased significantly over the course of treatment (p = .004), irrespective of responder status. Post-awakening cortisol was neither a predictor nor an indicator of treatment response. If future research confirms alpha-amylase activity as a modulator of treatment response, this may indicate a subgroup of patients with major depression which may benefit from augmentative treatments, such as heart rate variability biofeedback and/or cognitive interventions targeting high arousal.

Serial Hydrolysis for the Simultaneous Analysis of Catecholamines and Steroids in the Urine of Patients with Alopecia Areata

Catecholamines and steroids are well-known neurotransmitters and hormones that rapidly change the excitability of neurons. Alopecia areata is a disease for which the exact cause is unknown, but it is considered to be associated with stress, and so the simultaneous analysis of catecholamines and steroids is required for the diagnosis of alopecia areata. Thus, we herein report the simultaneous analysis of catecholamines and steroids bearing different functional groups for the first time, during which it was necessary to carry out a serial hydrolysis procedure. Following hydrolysis of the urine samples to produce the free forms from the urinary conjugates, ethyl acetate extractions were carried out, and chemical derivatization was performed using dansyl chloride to increase the sensitivity of the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The matrix effects and recoveries of this analytical method were validated, giving values of 85.4-122.9% and 88.8-123.0%, respectively. In addition, the method accuracy and precision were assessed, giving values of 0.4-21.5% and 2.0-21.6% for the intra-day and inter-day precisions, respectively. This validated method was then applied to identify differences between patients with and without alopecia areata, wherein the metanephrine content was found to be significantly higher in the alopecia areata patient group. This quantitative profiling method can also be applied to steroid-dependent diseases, as well as catecholamine-related diseases.

Empirically supported psychological treatments and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)

BACKGROUND

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) has been developed as an alternative approach to studying psychiatric disorders. The RDoC constructs and units of analysis, from genes up through paradigms, are intended to describe a hierarchy of priority measurements. Several of these have been investigated in the context of empirically-supported treatments, as either moderators or mediators of outcome.

METHOD

This review considers the available research on the moderating and mediating role of genes, molecules, circuits and physiology in cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) outcome studies for negative valence system conditions.

FINDINGS

Based on the review, research has aspired to identify candidate genes, molecules, circuits and physiological moderators or mediators of treatment, but no definitive tests have been conducted. Instead, several candidate variables have been found that deserve further investigation.

LIMITATIONS

The available research is based on diagnoses from the DSM, whereas the RDoC initiative endeavors to determine empirically valid taxonomic signs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are discussed in the joint context of developments in empirically-supported psychological therapy and the specific aims of the RDoC initiative, and conclude with recommendations for future research.

Mechanisms of change in negative thinking and urinary monoamines in depressed patients during acute treatment with group cognitive behavior therapy and antidepressant medication

This naturalistic study investigated the mechanisms of change in measures of negative thinking and in 24-h urinary metabolites of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), dopamine and serotonin in a sample of 43 depressed hospital patients attending an eight-session group cognitive behavior therapy program. Most participants (91%) were taking antidepressant medication throughout the therapy period according to their treating Psychiatrists' prescriptions. The sample was divided into outcome categories (19 Responders and 24 Non-responders) on the basis of a clinically reliable change index [Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P., 1991.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.] applied to the Beck Depression Inventory scores at the end of the therapy. Results of repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA] analyses of variance indicated that all measures of negative thinking improved significantly during therapy, and significantly more so in the Responders as expected. The treatment had a significant impact on urinary adrenaline and metadrenaline excretion however, these changes occurred in both Responders and Non-responders. Acute treatment did not significantly influence the six other monoamine metabolites. In summary, changes in urinary monoamine levels during combined treatment for depression were not associated with self-reported changes in mood symptoms.

Cognitive and health-related outcomes of group cognitive behavioural treatment for people with depressive symptoms in Hong Kong: randomized wait-list control study

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the efficacy of a territory-wide cognitive behavioural group treatment programme for Chinese people with depression launched in Hong Kong.

METHOD

Three hundred and forty-seven subjects with depressive symptoms (i.e. Beck Depression Inventory-Chinese version >9) were randomly assigned to CBT and waitlist control groups.

RESULTS

After 10 weeks of treatment, participants in the group CBT programme had significantly fewer symptoms of depression, fewer dysfunctional and perfectionist attitudes, and better quality of life when compared to the participants in the control group. Effect size statistics showed small to medium differences in symptoms of depression, dysfunctional and perfectionist attitudes and quality of life between the two groups (Cohen's d, 0.22-0.74). Statistical analysis of the clinical significance indicated that approximately 27% of the participants in the experimental group could be considered as clinically remitted or recovered, respectively (RCI >1.28). Last, multiple regression provided some evidence of a linkage between cognition and depression among the participants in the experimental group.

CONCLUSIONS

The design and content of the group CBT programme, which aimed at facilitating the understanding and modification of automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes among the participants, might have contributed to the initial positive results.

Changes in cognitive content during and following cognitive therapy for recurrent depression: substantial and enduring, but not predictive of change in depressive symptoms

The authors examined the amount and durability of change in the cognitive content of 156 adult outpatients with recurrent major depressive disorder after treatment with cognitive therapy. The pre-post magnitude of change was large for the Attributional Style Questionnaire Failure composite (d = 0.79), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (d = 1.05), and Self-Efficacy Scale (d = 0.83), and small for the Attributional Style Questionnaire Success composite (d = 0.30). Changes in cognitive content were clinically significant, as defined by their 64%-87% scores overlapping with score distributions from community dwellers. Improvement was durable over a 2-year follow-up. Changes in negative cognitive content could be detected early and distinguished responders from nonresponders. In responders, continuation-phase cognitive therapy was associated with further improvements on only 1 measure of cognitive content. Early changes in negative cognitive content did not predict later changes in depressive symptoms, which the authors discuss in the context of methodological challenges and the cognitive theory of depression.

Recovery from major depression: the role of support from family, friends, and spiritual beliefs

OBJECTIVE

Many of the risk factors for major depression are not amenable to change. The present study was designed to identify factors associated with recovery from depression that could be targets for clinical intervention.

METHOD

Sixty-two psychiatric in-patients who met diagnostic criteria for major depression were interviewed while hospitalized and re-interviewed 3 months after discharge. Analyses examined the relationship between depression and three sources of emotional support: family, friends, and spiritual beliefs.

RESULTS

Depression severity at baseline was the most consistent predictor of depression severity and diagnosis at follow-up. Patients who had recovered from depression by the time of the follow-up assessment reported higher perceived emotional support from family and friends at baseline. Support from friends, support from family and a composite of emotional support were significant predictors of depression beyond the effects of initial depression severity.

CONCLUSION

Aspects of emotional support were significantly associated with depression outcome.

Assessment of O-methylated catecholamine levels in plasma and urine for diagnosis of autonomic disorders

The term 'metanephrines' is used to indicate the two catechol 3-O-methylated metabolites of epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE): metanephrine and normetanephrine (NMN). The corresponding 3-O-methylated metabolite of dopamine is usually referred to as 3-methoxytyramine rather than 3-methoxydopamine and is not generally considered a "metanephrine". O-Methylation occurs outside the sympathetic neuron and neuroeffector junction. Metanephrines are products of the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Subsequent conjugation with sulfate or deamination by monoamine oxidase (MAO) followed by reduction to vanilmandelic acid (VMA) facilitates urinary excretion. For the clinician, measurement of normetanephrine provides an index of norepinephrine released during sympathetic nervous system activity, whereas metanephrine concentration provides an indication of adrenal medullary metabolism of epinephrine prior to its discharge into the circulation. Plasma epinephrine concentration is the preferable index of adrenal medullary epinephrine discharge. Pheochromocytomas, with their protean clinical manifestations, may be diagnostic challenges, but assay of metanephrines, especially plasma metanephrine, can be particularly helpful in diagnosis. These COMT metabolites may also help in elucidation of still undiscovered genetic and acquired disorders of catecholamine metabolism.

Cognitive and biochemical processes in depressed adult outpatients: a test of the circular process model

The circular process model is a psychobiological model of depression, in which it is postulated that catecholamines and negative cognitions interact to influence depression. Since its publication, there have been no empirical tests to support or refute the model. This study tested the model in 92 depressed adult outpatients with non-bipolar non-psychotic depression. There were no significant bivariate correlations among the biochemical and cognitive measures. However, the interactive model was supported by results of two out of three hierarchical regression analyses, in which the biochemical-by-cognitive interactive terms significantly predicted depression after the main effects of each variable were accounted for. These findings show sufficient evidence in support of the Circular Process Model to warrant further testing over the treatment period.