Activation of neurons in trigeminal caudalis by noxious oral acidic or salt stimuli is not reduced by amiloride

Genetic Deletion of TrpV1 and TrpA1 Does Not Alter Avoidance of or Patterns of Brainstem Activation to Citric Acid in Mice

Exposure of the oral cavity to acidic solutions evokes not only a sensation of sour, but also of sharp or tangy. Acidic substances potentially stimulate both taste buds and acid-sensitive mucosal free nerve endings. Mice lacking taste function (P2X2/P2X3 double-KO mice) refuse acidic solutions similar to wildtype (WT) mice and intraoral infusion of acidic solutions in these KO animals evokes substantial c-Fos activity within orosensory trigeminal nuclei as well as of the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS) (Stratford, Thompson, et al. 2017). This residual acid-evoked, non-taste activity includes areas that receive inputs from trigeminal and glossopharyngeal peptidergic (CGRP-containing) nerve fibers that express TrpA1 and TrpV1 both of which are activated by low pH. We compared avoidance responses in WT and TrpA1/V1 double-KO (TRPA1/V1Dbl-/-) mice in brief-access behavioral assay (lickometer) to 1, 3, 10, and 30 mM citric acid, along with 100 µM SC45647 and H2O. Both WT and TRPA1/V1Dbl-/- show similar avoidance, including to higher concentrations of citric acid (10 and 30 mM; pH 2.62 and pH 2.36, respectively), indicating that neither TrpA1 nor TrpV1 is necessary for the acid-avoidance behavior in animals with an intact taste system. Similarly, induction of c-Fos in the nTS and dorsomedial spinal trigeminal nucleus was similar in the WT and TRPA1/V1Dbl-/- animals. Taken together these results suggest non-TrpV1 and non-TrpA1 receptors underlie the residual responses to acids in mice lacking taste function.

Selective Effects of Temperature on the Sensory Irritation but not Taste of NaCl and Citric Acid

This study investigated the effect of temperature on taste and chemesthetic sensations produced by the prototypical salty and sour stimuli NaCl and citric acid. Experiment 1 measured the perceived intensity of irritation (burning, stinging) and taste (saltiness, sourness) produced on the tongue tip by brief (3 s) exposures to suprathreshold concentrations of NaCl and citric acid at 3 different temperatures (12, 34, and 42 °C). No significant effects of temperature were found on the taste or sensory irritation of either stimulus. Experiment 2 investigated the potential effects of temperature on sensory irritation at peri-threshold concentrations and its sensitization over time. Measurements were again made on the tongue tip at the same 3 temperatures. Heating was found to enhance the perception of irritation at peri-threshold concentrations for both stimuli, whereas cooling suppressed sensitization of irritation for NaCl but not for citric acid. These results (i) confirm prior evidence that perception of suprathreshold salty and sour tastes are independent of temperature; (ii) demonstrate that heat has only weak effects on sensory irritation produced by brief exposures to NaCl and citric acid; and (iii) suggest that sensitization of the irritation produced by NaCl and citric acid occur via different peripheral mechanisms that have different thermal sensitivities. Overall, the results are consistent with involvement of the heat-sensitive channel TRPV1 in the sensory irritation of both stimuli together with one or more additional channels (e.g., acid-sensing channel, epithelial sodium channel, TRPA1) that are insensitive to heat and may possibly be sensitive to cooling.

Psychophysical evaluation of a sanshool derivative (alkylamide) and the elucidation of mechanisms subserving tingle

Previous studies investigated the neural and molecular underpinnings of the tingle sensation evoked by sanshool and other natural or synthetic alkylamides. Currently, we sought to characterize the psychophysical properties associated with administration of these compounds. Like other chemesthetic stimuli, the synthetic tingle analog isobutylalkylamide (IBA) evoked a sensation that was temporally dynamic. Repeated IBA application at short (30 sec) interstimulus intervals (ISI) resulted in a tingle sensation that increased across trials. Application at longer ISIs (approximately 30 min) resulted in a sensation of decreased intensity consistent with self-desensitization. Prior treatment with the TRPV1 or TRPA1 agonists, capsaicin and mustard oil did not cross-desensitize the tingle sensation evoked by IBA suggesting that neither TRPV1 nor TRPA1 participate in the transduction mechanism sub-serving tingle. When evaluated over 30-min time period, lingual IBA evoked a sensation that was described initially as tingling and pungent but after approximately 15 min, as a cooling sensation. Further, we found that the sensation evoked by lingual IBA was potentiated by simultaneous application of cold (0 degrees C) and cool (21 degrees C) thermal stimuli but was unaffected by warm (33 degrees C) and hot (41 degrees C) temperatures. Finally, to test the hypothesis that the tingling sensation is subserved by the activation of mechanosensitve fibers, we evaluated lingual tactile thresholds in the presence and absence of lingual IBA. The presence of IBA significantly raised lingual tactile thresholds, whereas capsaicin did not, identifying a role for mechanosensitive fibers in conveying the tingle sensation evoked by sanshool-like compounds. Collectively, these results show that lingual alkylamide evokes a complex sensation that is temporally dynamic and consistent with in vitro and in vivo experiments suggesting these compounds activate mechanosensitve neurons via blockade of KCNK two-pore potassium channels to induce the novel tingling sensation.