Inhibitory effects from various types of dorsal column and raphe magnus stimulations on nociceptive withdrawal flexion reflexes

Anatomo-physiological basis and applied techniques of electrical neuromodulation in chronic pain

Chronic pain, a complex and debilitating condition, poses a significant challenge to both patients and healthcare providers worldwide. Conventional pharmacological interventions often prove inadequate in delivering satisfactory relief while carrying the risks of addiction and adverse reactions. In recent years, electric neuromodulation emerged as a promising alternative in chronic pain management. This method entails the precise administration of electrical stimulation to specific nerves or regions within the central nervous system to regulate pain signals. Through mechanisms that include the alteration of neural activity and the release of endogenous pain-relieving substances, electric neuromodulation can effectively alleviate pain and improve patients' quality of life. Several modalities of electric neuromodulation, with a different grade of invasiveness, provide tailored strategies to tackle various forms and origins of chronic pain. Through an exploration of the anatomical and physiological pathways of chronic pain, encompassing neurotransmitter involvement, this narrative review offers insights into electrical therapies' mechanisms of action, clinical utility, and future perspectives in chronic pain management.

Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain Syndrome: Mechanisms of Modulation, Technical Features and Clinical Application

Chronic low-back pain (CLBP) is a common disease with several negative consequences on the quality of life, work and activity ability and increased costs to the health-care system. When pharmacological, psychological, physical and occupational therapies or surgery fail to reduce CLBP, patients may be a candidate for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS). SCS consists of the transcutaneous or surgical implantation of different types of electrodes in the epidural space; electrodes are then connected to an Implanted Pulse Generator (IPG) that generates stimulating currents. Through spinal and supraspinal mechanisms based on the “gate control theory for pain transmission”, SCS reduces symptoms of CLBP in the almost totality of well-selected patients and its effect lasts up to eight years in around 75% of patients. However, the evidence in favor of SCS still remains weak, mainly due to poor trial methodology and design. This narrative review is mainly addressed to those professionals that may encounter patients with CLBP failing conventional treatments. For this reason, we report the mechanisms of pain relief during SCS, the technical features and some clinical considerations about the application of SCS in patients with CLBP.

Supraspinal Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Modulation of Pain: Five Decades of Research and Prospects for the Future

The field of spinal cord stimulation is expanding rapidly, with new waveform paradigms asserting supraspinal sites of action. The scope of treatment applications is also broadening from chronic pain to include cerebral ischemia, dystonia, tremor, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, neuropsychiatric disorders, memory, addiction, cognitive function, and other neurologic diseases. The role of neurostimulation as an alternative strategy to opioids for chronic pain treatment is under robust discussion in both scientific and public forums. An understanding of the supraspinal mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of spinal cord stimulation will aid in the appropriate application and development of optimal stimulation strategies for modulating pain signaling pathways. In this review, the authors focus on clinical and preclinical studies that indicate the role of supraspinal mechanisms in spinal cord stimulation-induced pain inhibition, and explore directions for future investigations.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives:

Paresthesia-free stimulation such as high frequency and burst have been demonstrated as effective therapies for neuropathic pain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of refractory angina pectoris (RAP).

Materials and Methods:

Relevant randomized controlled trials that investigated SCS for patients with RAP were comprehensively searched in Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Five meta-analyses were performed examining the changes in Canadian Cardiovascular Society classes, exercise time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of pain, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and nitroglycerin use in RAP patients after SCS therapy. We analyzed standardized mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome by Review Manager 5.0 and STATA 12.0.

Results:

A total of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 476 RAP patients were identified. A trend of reduction in the angina frequency (MD=−9.03, 95% CI, −15.70 to −2.36) and nitroglycerin consumption (MD=−0.64, 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.45) could be observed in the SCS group. Compared with the control group, SCS showed benefit on increasing exercise time (MD=0.49, 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) and treatment satisfaction (MD=6.87, 95% CI, 2.07-11.66) with decreased VAS scores of pain (MD=−0.50, 95% CI, −0.81 to −0.20) and disease perception (MD=−8.34, 95% CI, −14.45 to −2.23). However, the result did not reach the significance level in terms of physical limitation (95% CI, −8.75 to 3.38; P=0.39) or angina stability (95% CI, −7.55 to 3.67; P=0.50).

Discussion:

The current meta-analysis suggested that SCS was a potential alternative in the treatment of PAP patients. Further investigation for finding the appropriate intensity of stimulation is required before this treatment should be widely recommended and applied.

Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Modulation of Cortical Connectivity With Therapeutic SCS

INTRODUCTION

The neurophysiological basis of pain relief due to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and the related cortical processing of sensory information are not completely understood. The aim of this study was to use resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to detect changes in cortical networks and cortical processing related to the stimulator-induced pain relief.

METHODS

Ten patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or neuropathic leg pain underwent thoracic epidural spinal cord stimulator implantation. Stimulation parameters associated with "optimal" pain reduction were evaluated prior to imaging studies. Rs-fMRI was obtained on a 3 Tesla, Philips Achieva MRI. Rs-fMRI was performed with stimulator off (300TRs) and stimulator at optimum (Opt, 300 TRs) pain relief settings. Seed-based analysis of the resting state functional connectivity was conducted using seeds in regions established as participating in pain networks or in the default mode network (DMN) in addition to the network analysis. NCUT (normalized cut) parcellation was used to generate 98 cortical and subcortical regions of interest in order to expand our analysis of changes in functional connections to the entire brain. We corrected for multiple comparisons by limiting the false discovery rate to 5%.

RESULTS

Significant differences in resting state connectivity between SCS off and optimal state were seen between several regions related to pain perception, including the left frontal insula, right primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, as well as in regions involved in the DMN, such as the precuneus. In examining changes in connectivity across the entire brain, we found decreased connection strength between somatosensory and limbic areas and increased connection strength between somatosensory and DMN with optimal SCS resulting in pain relief. This suggests that pain relief from SCS may be reducing negative emotional processing associated with pain, allowing somatosensory areas to become more integrated into default mode activity.

CONCLUSION

SCS reduces the affective component of pain resulting in optimal pain relief. Study shows a decreased connectivity between somatosensory and limbic areas associated with optimal pain relief due to SCS.

The role of the dorsolateral funiculi in the pain relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation: a study in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Activation of the dorsal columns is relayed to supraspinal centers, involved in pain modulation, probably via the descending fibers in the dorsolateral funiculi (DLF). The present study examines the role of the DLF in the attenuation of pain-related signs by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Several groups of rats were subjected to nerve injury and to chronic bilateral DLF lesions at C5-7 level. In each animal, two sets of miniature electrodes were implanted, a caudal system placed in the dorsal epidural space at low thoracic level and another implanted over the dorsal column nuclei, rostral to the lesions. Stimulation (50 Hz, 0.2 ms; 70 % of motor threshold) was applied for 5 min via either of the electrodes. Behavioral tests were used to assess the effects of SCS on the nerve injury-induced mechanical and cold hypersensitivity and heat hyperalgesia. Prior to application of SCS, antagonists to either of GABAA or B, 5-HT1 or 1-2 or α/β-adrenergic receptors were injected i.p. Both stimulations produced comparable decreases (80-90 % of the control) of neuropathic manifestations in rats with intact spinal cords. DLF lesions attenuated the effects of both types of stimulation by about 50 %. Pretreatment with receptor antagonists differentially counteracted the effects of rostral and caudal stimulation; the inhibition with rostral stimulation generally being more prominently influenced. These results provide further support to the notion of important involvement of brainstem pain modulating centers in the effects of SCS. A major component of the inhibitory spinal-supraspinal-spinal loop is mediated by fibers running in the DLF.

Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current perspectives

Neuropathic pain constitutes a significant portion of chronic pain. Patients with neuropathic pain are usually more heavily burdened than patients with nociceptive pain. They suffer more often from insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Moreover, analgesic medication often has an insufficient effect on neuropathic pain. Spinal cord stimulation constitutes a therapy alternative that, to date, remains underused. In the last 10 to 15 years, it has undergone constant technical advancement. This review gives an overview of the present practice of spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain and current developments such as high-frequency stimulation and peripheral nerve field stimulation.

Nociceptive behavior in animal models for peripheral neuropathy: spinal and supraspinal mechanisms

Since the initial description by Wall [Wall, P.D., 1967. The laminar organization of dorsal horn and effects of descending impulses. J. Neurophysiol. 188, 403-423] of tonic descending inhibitory control of dorsal horn neurons, several studies have aimed to characterize the role of various brain centers in the control of nociceptive input to the spinal cord. The role of brainstem centers in pain inhibition has been well documented over the past four decades. Lesion to peripheral nerves results in hypersensitivity to mild tactile or cold stimuli (allodynia) and exaggerated response to nociceptive stimuli (hyperalgesia), both considered as cardinal signs of neuropathic pain. The increased interest in animal models for peripheral neuropathy has raised several questions concerning the rostral conduction of the neuropathic manifestations and the role of supraspinal centers, especially brainstem, in the inhibitory control or in the abnormal contribution to the maintenance and facilitation of neuropathic-like behavior. This review aims to summarize the data on the ascending and descending modulation of neuropathic manifestations and discusses the recent experimental data on the role of supraspinal centers in the control of neuropathic pain. In particular, the review emphasizes the importance of the reciprocal interconnections between the analgesic areas of the brainstem and the pain-related areas of the forebrain. The latter includes the cerebral limbic areas, the prefrontal cortex, the intralaminar thalamus and the hypothalamus and play a critical role in the control of pain considered as part of an integrated behavior related to emotions and various homeostatic regulations. We finally speculate that neuropathic pain, like extrapyramidal motor syndromes, reflects a disorder in the processing of somatosensory information.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral activation during spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) consisting of electrical stimulation of the dorsal spinal cord using epidural electrodes has been shown to relieve chronic neuropathic pain. To analyze the cerebral activation patterns related to SCS, and to evaluate the effects of SCS on the processing of acute experimental pain, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on eight patients suffering from failed back surgery syndrome who were also being treated with SCS for severe pain in their legs and lower back. Three types of stimulation were used, each lasting 36s: (i) SCS, (ii) heat pain (HP) applied to the leg affected by neuropathic pain, and (iii) simultaneous HP and SCS. During SCS, we found increased activation of the medial primary sensorimotor cortex somatotopically corresponding to the foot and/or perineal region, contralateral posterior insula, and the ipsilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (S2). Decreased activation was seen in the bilateral primary motor cortices and the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex corresponding to the shoulder, elbow and hand. Compared to separately presented HP and SCS, simultaneous HP and SCS showed statistically significant activation of the bilateral inferior temporal cortex and the ipsilateral cerebellar cortex. The activation of the primary motor cortex, insula and S2 during SCS may directly interfere with the processing of neuropathic pain. When SCS is associated with heat pain, the paralimbic association cortex and cerebellum show activation exceeding the sum of activations resulting from separate SCS and heat pain stimulation. The explanation of this could possibly rest with the continuous comparisons of simultaneous pain and somatosensory sensations occurring in a single dermatome.

Effects of spinal cord stimulation on the cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in failed back surgery syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the functional activation of the somatosensory cortical regions in neuropathic pain patients during therapeutic spinal cord stimulation (SCS).

METHODS

In nine failed back surgery syndrome patients, the left tibial and the left sural nerves were stimulated in two sessions with intensities at motor and pain thresholds, respectively. The cortical somatosensory evoked potentials were analyzed using source dipole analysis based on 111 EEG signals.

RESULTS

The short-latency components of the source located in the right primary somatosensory cortex (SI: 43, 54 and 65ms) after tibial nerve stimulation, the mid-latency SI component (87ms) after sural nerve stimulation, and the mid-latency components in the right (approximately 161ms) and left (approximately 168ms) secondary somatosensory cortices (SII) were smaller in the presence of SCS than in absence of SCS. The long-latency source component arising from the mid-cingulate cortex (approximately 313ms) was smaller for tibial and larger for sural nerve stimuli during SCS periods compared to periods without SCS.

CONCLUSIONS

SCS attenuates the somatosensory processing in the SI and SII. In the mid-cingulate cortex, the effect of SCS depends on the type of stimulation and nerve fibers involved.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results suggest that the effects of SCS on cortical somatosensory processing may contribute to a reduction of allodynia during SCS.

Differential neurotoxic effects of methylmercury and mercuric sulfide in rats

Methylmercury (MeHg) is an environmental toxicant, while mercuric sulfide (HgS) is a main active component of cinnabar, a Chinese mineral medicine used as a sedative. Because the neurotoxicological effects of HgS were not clearly understood, in this study, we attempted to compare HgS with MeHg in various physiological responses in Sprague-Dawley rats. After oral administration (2 mg/(kg day)) for consecutive 5 and 14 days, MeHg reversibly decreased both of motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) and tail flick response, whereas irreversibly inhibited all of the motor equilibrium performance, recovery of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) following exhaustic tetanic stimuli and Na+/K+-ATPase activity of the isolated sciatic nerve. These toxic effects of MeHg were found in well correlation of Hg contents of various tissues (blood, cerebral cortex, liver and kidney) in rats. For comparison, a dose of 1g/(kg day) of HgS was orally administered to the rats based on our previous findings on ototoxicity of HgS. The results revealed that HgS only reversibly delayed the recovery of suppressed CMAP and inhibited sciatic nerve Na+/K+-ATPase activity in accordance to the lower Hg contents of the tissues. These findings provide the important information on the differential susceptibility of various nervous tissues to MeHg and HgS. The neruotoxic effects produced by HgS was estimated to be about 1000 of those induced by MeHg found in this study and our previous reports.

Upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines and nerve growth factor by intraplantar injection of capsaicin in rats

Capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents (CSPA) are known to be involved in nociception and neurogenic inflammation. Extensive research has been devoted to the sensory role of these fibres but less attention has been paid to their local effector function. This study aimed at gaining more insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the neurogenic inflammation induced by this special group of afferent fibres. Different groups of rats (n = 5 in each group), either naive or subjected to selective ablation of their CSPA, received individual intraplantar injections of saline, capsaicin, its vehicle or capsaicin preceded by its antagonist, capsazepine. Acute tests for nociception were used to assess the variations of the nociceptive thresholds. Variations of the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and nerve growth factor (NGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intraplantar injection of capsaicin (10 microg in 50 microl) produced a sustained thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia that peaked at 3-6 h and disappeared 24 h following the injection. Similar capsaicin injection in further groups of rats produced an early upregulation of the proinflammatory cytokines and NGF, which peaked at 30-60 min and returned to control levels within 2-5 h. Similar effects were observed following the application of either capsaicin or intense electrical stimulation on the cut end of the distal portion of the sciatic nerve. The effects of capsaicin were abolished in rats subjected to selective ablation of their CSPA. These results demonstrate that CSPA can simultaneously challenge the immune system through the release of proinflammatory mediators and the central nervous system through nociceptive signalling and can therefore serve as a common afferent pathway to both immune and nervous systems.

Attenuation of neuropathic pain by segmental and supraspinal activation of the dorsal column system in awake rats

In addition to its involvement in the transmission of neuropathic pain, the dorsal column system has been shown to have analgesic effects when electrically stimulated. The segmental or supraspinal origin of the analgesia, however, has not been clearly delineated. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the contribution of supraspinal mechanisms to the inhibition of allodynia and hyperalgesia in two different rat models of mononeuropathy. Mononeuropathy was induced, under deep anesthesia, in several groups of rats (n=7 each) following either the chronic constriction injury or the spared nerve injury model. Mechanical and cold allodynia were assessed by the Von Frey monofilaments and by the acetone drop test, respectively. Thermal hyperalgesia was assessed by the paw withdrawal and hot plate tests. Bipolar electrodes for dorsal column stimulation were implanted chronically in all rats on the dorsal aspect of the medulla at the level of the obex. Selective dorsal column bilateral lesions were performed at the upper cervical level in some groups of rats. Dorsal column nuclear stimulation, rostral to selective dorsal spinal lesions, produced strong inhibitory effects on the allodynia and hyperalgesia observed in both models of mononeuropathy. These effects were comparable to those observed following similar stimulations in rats with an intact spinal cord. Our results demonstrate strong inhibitory effects of dorsal column stimulation on neuropathic pain. This inhibition can be attributed to the activation of brainstem pain-modulating centers via rostral projections of the dorsal column nuclei.