Combined effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor antagonism in conscious pigs with congestive heart failure

The dilemma of dual renin-angiotensin system blockade in chronic kidney disease: why beneficial in animal experiments but not in the clinic?

Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) improved the prognosis in patients with hypertension, heart failure, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. However, combining different drugs brought no further benefit while increasing the risk of hyperkalemia, hypotension and acute renal failure. This was so with combining angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptors type 1 antagonists (ARB). Dissimilarly, in animal disease models this dual therapy proved clearly superior to single drug treatment and became the optimal standard regime for comparison with other treatments. This review analyzes the causes of the discrepancy of effects of the dual therapy between animal experiments versus clinical studies, and is focused on the outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Discussed is the role of species differences in RAAS, of the variability of the disease features in humans versus relative stability in animals, of the genetic uniformity in the animals but not in humans, and of the biased publication habits of experimental versus clinical studies. We attempt to understand the causes and reconcile the discordant findings and suggest to what extent dual RAAS inhibition should be continued in animal experiments and why its application in the clinics should be limited to strictly selected groups of patients.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibition on noradrenergic nerve terminal function in pacing-induced heart failure

Chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has been shown to improve cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal function in heart failure. To determine whether similar effects could be produced by angiotensin II AT(1) receptor blockade, we administered the ACE inhibitor quinapril, angiotensin II AT(1) receptor blocker losartan, or both agents together, to rabbits with pacing-induced heart failure. Chronic rapid pacing produced left ventricular dilation and decline of fractional shortening, increased plasma norepinephrine (NE), and caused reductions of myocardial NE uptake activity, NE histofluorescence profile, and tyrosine hydroxylase immunostained profile. Administration of quinapril or losartan retarded the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and attenuated cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal abnormalities in heart failure. Quinapril and losartan together produced greater effects than either agent alone. The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on improvement of left ventricular function and remodeling, however, was not sustained. Our results suggest that the effects of ACE inhibitors are mediated via the reduction of angiotensin II and that angiotensin II plays a pivotal role in modulating cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal function during development of heart failure. The combined effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II AT(1) receptor blockade on cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal dysfunction may contribute to the beneficial effects on cardiac function in heart failure.

Effects of ACE inhibitor, AT1 antagonist, and combined treatment in mice with heart failure

We tested the hypothesis that a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (AT1-ant) may have an additive cardioprotective effect in mice with heart failure (HF), because these two agents could have other mechanisms of action besides interrupting the renin-angiotensin system. ACEi prevent degradation of bradykinin. During treatment with AT1-ant, increased angiotensin II could activate AT2 receptors, with an antitrophic effect. To test this hypothesis, we used a mouse model of HF induced by myocardial infarction. Seven days after surgery, mice were divided into six groups and treated for 23 weeks: (a) sham ligation; (b) HF-vehicle; (c) HF-ACEi; (d) HF-AT1-ant; (e) HF-ACEi + AT1-ant (half dose of each); and (f) HF-ACEi + AT1-ant (full dose of each). Cardiac function was evaluated in conscious mice during the treatment period. The HF-vehicle group showed significantly decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), shortening fraction (SF), and cardiac output (CO) and increased LV dimensions, interstitial collagen, and myocyte cross-sectional area (MCSA) compared with controls. Treatment with ACEi or AT1-ant significantly increased EF, SF, and CO and decreased LV dimensions and MCSA in mice with HF. However, a combination of these drugs did not improve cardiac function more than ACEi or AT1-ant alone. We concluded that ACEi and AT1-ant have similar cardioprotective effects and may reach maximal effect when given individually; thus no further improvement can be achieved with combined therapy in mice with HF.

Combination therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and AT1 receptor inhibitor on ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade after myocardial infarction (MI). In addition, whether combined angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) receptor antagonist may be superior to either drug alone on ventricular remodeling remains unclear. The goal of this study was to determine if the cardiac effects of the combined administration of an ACE inhibitor and AT(1) receptor antagonist are greater than those produced by either of these agents administered individually after MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After MI, rats were divided into 4 groups: 1) untreated animals, 2) lisinopril treatment (20 mg/kg/day), 3) losartan treatment (20 mg/kg/day), and 4) lisinopril plus losartan treatment. After 3 months, the cardiac parameters studied were: mortality, fibrosis (hydroxyproline), hypertrophy (ventricular weight/body weight ratio [VW/BW]), left ventricular enlargement (volume at end-diastolic pressure equaled zero/body weight ratio [V0/BW]), and ventricular function (isovolumetric developed pressure, dp/dt, -dp/dt). A lowest mortality rate in the animals treated with the combination of both ACE inhibitor and AT(1) receptor antagonist was observed. Although lisinopril and losartan significantly decreased VW/BW ratio, when administered concomitantly, VW/BW ratio was lower than when either agent was administered individually. There were no differences in right ventricle hydroxyproline concentration. Only combination therapy decreased V0/BW ratio. The treatment with lisinopril plus losartan resulted in increases in the development of pressure versus untreated group; without alteration in dp/dt and -dp/dt.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the AT(1) receptor blockade and ACE inhibitor is more effective than individual treatment on ventricular remodeling and survival after MI in rats.