Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between diltiazem and quinidine

Assessment of Quinidine-Induced Torsades de Pointes Risks Using a Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Linked to Cardiac Ionic Current Inhibition

The lethality of torsades de pointes (TdP) by drugs is one of main reasons that some drugs were withdrawn from the market. In order to assess drug-induced TdP risks, a model of cardiac ionic current suppression in human ventricular myocytes (ToR-ORd model), combined with the maximum effective free therapeutic plasma concentration or the maximum effective free therapeutic myocyte concentration was often used, with the latter proved to be more relevant and more accurate. We aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, incorporated with a human cardiomyocyte pharmacodynamic (PD) model, to provide a comprehensive assessment of drug-induced TdP risks in normal and specific scenarios. Quinidine served as an example to validate the PBPK-PD model via predicting plasma quinidine concentrations and quinidine-induced changes in QT interval (ΔQTc). The predicted plasma quinidine concentrations and ΔQTc values following oral administration or intravenous administration of quinidine were comparable to clinic observations. Visual predictive checks showed that most of the observed plasma concentrations and ΔQTc values fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations. The validated PBPK-PD model was further applied to assess the TdP risks using frequencies of early afterdepolarization and long-QT syndrome occurrence in 4 scenarios, such as therapeutic dose, supra-therapeutic dose, alkalosis, and hyperkalemia in 200 human subjects. In conclusion, the developed PBPK-PD model may be applied to predict the quinidine pharmacokinetics and quinidine-induced TdP risks in healthy subjects, but also simulate quinidine-induced TdP risks under disease conditions, such as hypokalemia and alkalosis.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of quinidine to establish a CYP3A4, P-gp, and CYP2D6 drug-drug-gene interaction network

The antiarrhythmic agent quinidine is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and is therefore recommended for use in clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. However, as quinidine is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and P-gp, it is susceptible to DDIs involving these proteins. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can help to mechanistically assess the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes of a drug and has proven its usefulness in predicting even complex interaction scenarios. The objectives of the presented work were to develop a PBPK model of quinidine and to integrate the model into a comprehensive drug-drug(-gene) interaction (DD(G)I) network with a diverse set of CYP3A4 and P-gp perpetrators as well as CYP2D6 and P-gp victims. The quinidine parent-metabolite model including 3-hydroxyquinidine was developed using pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies after intravenous and oral administration covering a broad dosing range (0.1-600 mg). The model covers efflux transport via P-gp and metabolic transformation to either 3-hydroxyquinidine or unspecified metabolites via CYP3A4. The 3-hydroxyquinidine model includes further metabolism by CYP3A4 as well as an unspecific hepatic clearance. Model performance was assessed graphically and quantitatively with greater than 90% of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters within two-fold of corresponding observed values. The model was successfully used to simulate various DD(G)I scenarios with greater than 90% of predicted DD(G)I pharmacokinetic parameter ratios within two-fold prediction success limits. The presented network will be provided to the research community and can be extended to include further perpetrators, victims, and targets, to support investigations of DD(G)Is.

A pharmacological characterization of electrocardiogram PR and QRS intervals in conscious telemetered rats

INTRODUCTION

The conscious telemetered rat is widely used as an early in vivo screening model for assessing the cardiovascular safety of novel pharmacological agents. The current study aimed to identify its utility in assessing electrocardiogram (ECG) PR and QRS interval changes.

METHOD

Male Han-Wistar rats (~250 g) were implanted with radio-telemetry devices for the recording of ECG and haemodynamic parameters. Animals (n = 4-8) were treated with single doses of calcium (nifedipine, diltiazem or verapamil; CCBs) or sodium channel blockers (quinidine or flecainide; SCBs) or their corresponding vehicles in an ascending dose design. Data was recorded continuously up to 24 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis of blood samples was performed to allow comparison of effects to published data in other species.

RESULTS

Of the CCBs, only diltiazem (300 mg/kg) prolonged the PR interval (49 ± 2 versus vehicle: 43 ± 1 ms), although this was not statistically significant (p = .11). QA interval decreased with nifedipine (30 ± 1 versus 24 ± 0 ms) and diltiazem (34 ± 1 versus 27 ± 1 ms) but increased with verapamil (30 ± 0 versus 37 ± 1 ms) demonstrating pharmacological activity of each agent. Both SCBs, caused statistically significant (p < .05) increases in both intervals - quinidine (100 mg/kg; PR: 50 ± 2 versus 43 ± 1 ms; QRS: 22 ± 2 versus 18 ± 1 ms) and flecainide (9 mg/kg; PR: 56 ± 1 versus 46 ± 1 ms; QRS: 27 ± 1 versus 21 ± 1 ms). Drug plasma exposure was confirmed in all animals.

DISCUSSION

At similar plasma concentrations to other species, the conscious telemetered rat demonstrates limited utility in assessing PR interval prolongation by CCBs, despite significant contractility effects being observed. However, results with SCBs demonstrate a potential application for evaluating drug-induced QRS prolongation.

Progress in the Consideration of Possible Sex Differences in Drug Interaction Studies

Background:

Anecdotal evidence suggests that there may be sex differences in Drug-drug Interactions (DDI) involving specific drugs. Regulators have provided general guidance for the inclusion of females in clinical studies. Some clinical studies have reported sex differences in the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates, suggesting that DDI involving CYP3A4 substrates could potentially show sex differences.

Objective:

The aim of this review was to investigate whether recent prospective DDI studies have included both sexes and whether there was evidence for the presence or absence of sex differences with the DDIs.

Methods:

The relevant details from 156 drug interaction studies within 124 papers were extracted and evaluated.

Results:

Only eight studies (five papers) compared the outcome of the DDI between males and females. The majority of the studies had only male volunteers. Five studies had females only while 60 had males only, with 7.7% of the studies having an equal proportion of both sexes. Surprisingly, four studies did not specify the sex of the subjects.

:

Based on the limited number of studies comparing males and females, no specific trends or conclusions were evident. Sex differences in the interaction were reported between ketoconazole and midazolam as well as clarithromycin and midazolam. However, no sex difference was observed with the interaction between clarithromycin and triazolam or erythromycin and triazolam. No sex-related PK differences were observed with the interaction between ketoconazole and domperidone, although sex-related differences in QT prolongation were observed.

Conclusion:

This review has shown that only limited progress had been made with the inclusion of both sexes in DDI studies.

Assessment of Multi-Ion Channel Block in a Phase I Randomized Study Design: Results of the CiPA Phase I ECG Biomarker Validation Study

Balanced multi‐ion channel‐blocking drugs have low torsade risk because they block inward currents. The Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative proposes to use an in silico cardiomyocyte model to determine the presence of balanced block, and absence of heart rate corrected J‐T_peak (J‐T_peakc) prolongation would be expected for balanced blockers. This study included three balanced blockers in a 10‐subject‐per‐drug parallel design; lopinavir/ritonavir and verapamil met the primary end point of ΔΔJ‐T_peakc upper bound < 10 ms, whereas ranolazine did not (upper bounds of 8.8, 6.1, and 12.0 ms, respectively). Chloroquine, a predominant blocker of the potassium channel encoded by the ether‐à‐go‐go related gene (hERG), prolonged ΔΔQTc and ΔΔJ‐T_peakc by ≥ 10 ms. In a separate crossover design, diltiazem (calcium block) did not shorten dofetilide‐induced ΔQTc prolongation, but shortened ΔJ‐T_peakc and prolonged ΔT_peak‐T_end. Absence of J‐T_peakc prolongation seems consistent with balanced block; however, small sample size (10 subjects) may be insufficient to characterize concentration‐response in some cases.

Reliability and extension of quantitative prediction of CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions based on clinical data

An approach was proposed in 2007 for quantitative predictions of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4-mediated drug-drug interactions. It is based on two characteristic parameters: the contribution ratio (CR; i.e., the fraction of victim drug clearance by CYP) and the inhibition ratio (IR) of the inhibitor. Knowledge of these parameters allows forecasting of the ratio between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the victim drug when given with the inhibitor and the AUC of the victim drug when it is given alone. So far, these parameters were established for 21 substrates and 17 inhibitors. The goals of our study were to test the assumption of substrate independence of the potency of inhibitors in vivo and to estimate the CR and IR for an extended list of substrates and inhibitors of CYP3A4. The assumption of independence of IRs from the substrate was evaluated on a set of eight victim drugs and eight inhibitors. Forty-four AUC ratios were available. This assumption was rejected in four cases, but it did not result in more than a twofold error in AUC ratio predictions. The extended list of substrates and inhibitors was defined by a thorough literature search. Fifty-nine AUC ratios were available for the global analysis. Final estimates of CRs and IRs were obtained for 37 substrates and 25 inhibitors, respectively. The mean prediction error of the ratios was 0.02, while the mean absolute prediction error was 0.58. Predictive distributions for 917 possible interactions were obtained, giving detailed information on some drugs or inhibitors that have been poorly studied so far.

Risk assessment of mechanism-based inactivation in drug-drug interactions

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that occur via mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 are of serious concern. Although several predictive models have been published, early risk assessment of MBIs is still challenging. For reversible inhibitors, the DDI risk categorization using [I]/K(i) ([I], the inhibitor concentration; K(i), the inhibition constant) is widely used in drug discovery and development. Although a simple and reliable methodology such as [I]/K(i) categorization for reversible inhibitors would be useful for mechanism-based inhibitors (MBIs), comprehensive analysis of an analogous measure reflecting in vitro potency for inactivation has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the term λ/k(deg) (λ, first-order inactivation rate at a given MBI concentration; k(deg), enzyme degradation rate constant) would be useful in the prediction of the in vivo DDI risk of MBIs. Twenty-one MBIs with both in vivo area under the curve (AUC) change of marker substrates and in vitro inactivation parameters were identified in the literature and analyzed. The results of this analysis show that in vivo DDIs with >2-fold change of object drug AUC can be identified with the cutoff value of λ/k(deg) = 1, where unbound steady-state C(max) is used for inhibitor concentration. However, the use of total C(max) led to great overprediction of DDI risk. The risk assessment using λ/k(deg) coupled with unbound C(max) can be useful for the DDI risk evaluation of MBIs in drug discovery and development.

Clinical outcomes and management of mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is characterized by NADPH-, time-, and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYPs to reactive metabolites. Such inhibition of CYP3A4 can be due to the chemical modification of the heme, the protein, or both as a result of covalent binding of modified heme to the protein. The inactivation of CYP3A4 by drugs has important clinical significance as it metabolizes approximately 60% of therapeutic drugs, and its inhibition frequently causes unfavorable drug–drug interactions and toxicity. The clinical outcomes due to CYP3A4 inactivation depend on many factors associated with the enzyme, drugs, and patients. Clinical professionals should adopt proper approaches when using drugs that are mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors. These include early identification of drugs behaving as CYP3A4 inactivators, rational use of such drugs (eg, safe drug combination regimen, dose adjustment, or discontinuation of therapy when toxic drug interactions occur), therapeutic drug monitoring, and predicting the risks for potential drug–drug interactions. A good understanding of CYP3A4 inactivation and proper clinical management are needed by clinical professionals when these drugs are used.

Application of mechanism-based CYP inhibition for predicting drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND

A mechanism-based inhibition of CYPs is characterized by NADPH-, time- and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation and substrate protection. A significant inactivation of CYPs and particularly the main human hepatic and intestinal CYPs could result in clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To address whether DDIs owing to mechanism-based CYP inhibition is predictable based on in vitro inhibitory data.

METHOD

Medline (by means of PubMed up to 26 March 2009) has been searched using proper relevant terms.

RESULT/CONCLUSION

It is possible to predict DDIs caused by mechanism-based CYP inhibition, although the in vitro data do not necessarily translate directly into relative extents of inhibition in vivo because in vivo clinical consequences depend on additional factors that are not easily accounted for in vitro and for reversible inhibition. Incorporation of other important parameters such as CYP degradation rate (k(deg)), relative contribution of the CYP inactivated to the victim drug elimination (f(m(CYP))) and inhibition of intestinal CYP-mediated first-pass metabolism of the object drug (F'(gut)/F(gut) ratio) into the prediction models significantly improves the prediction. Uncertainty of the prediction is mainly from the variability in the estimates of these critical parameters.

Pharmacokinetics of the calcium-channel blocker diltiazem after a single intravenous dose in horses

The pharmacokinetics of diltiazem were determined in eight healthy horses. Diltiazem HCl, 1 mg/kg i.v., was administered over 5 min. Venous blood samples were collected at regular intervals after administration. Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. A second, putative metabolite was detected, but could not be identified due to the lack of an authentic standard. Data were analyzed by nonlinear least-squares regression analysis. The median (minimum-maximum) peak plasma concentration of diltiazem was 727 (539-976) ng/mL. Plasma diltiazem concentration vs. time data were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order drug elimination. The distribution half-life was 12 (6-23) min, the terminal half-life was 93 (73-161) min, the mean residence time was 125 (99-206) min, total plasma clearance was 14.4 (10.4-18.6) mL/kg/min, and the volume of distribution at steady-state was 1.84 (1.46-2.51) L/kg. The normalized ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) of desacetyldiltiazem to the AUC of diltiazem was 0.088 (0.062-0.179). The disposition of diltiazem in horses was characterized by rapid distribution and elimination and a terminal half-life shorter than reported in humans and dogs. Because of the reported low pharmacologic activity, plasma diltiazem metabolite concentrations were not considered clinically important.

PREDICTION OF TIME-DEPENDENT CYP3A4 DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS: IMPACT OF ENZYME DEGRADATION, PARALLEL ELIMINATION PATHWAYS, AND INTESTINAL INHIBITION

Time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 often results in clinically significant drug-drug interactions. In the current study, 37 in vivo cases of irreversible inhibition were collated, focusing on macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin) and diltiazem as inhibitors. The interactions included 17 different CYP3A substrates showing up to a 7-fold increase in AUC (13.5% of studies were in the range of potent inhibition). A systematic analysis of the impact of CYP3A4 degradation half-life (mean t1/2deg = 3 days, ranging from 1 to 6 days) on the prediction of the extent of interaction for compounds with a differential contribution from CYP3A4 to the overall elimination (defined by fmCYP3A4) was performed. Although the prediction accuracy was very sensitive to the CYP3A4 degradation rate for substrates mainly eliminated by this enzyme fm(CYP3A4 >or= 0.9), minimal effects are observed when CYP3A4 contributes less than 50% to the overall elimination in cases when the parallel elimination pathway is not subject to inhibition. Use of the mean CYP3A4 t1/2deg (3 days), average unbound systemic plasma concentration of the inhibitor, and the corresponding fm(CYP3A4) resulted in 89% of studies predicted within 2-fold of the in vivo value. The impact of the interaction in the gut wall was assessed by assuming maximal intestinal inhibition of CYP3A4. Although a reduced number of false-negative predictions was observed, there was an increased number of overpredictions, and generally, a loss of prediction accuracy was observed. The impact of the possible interplay between CYP3A4 and efflux transporters on the intestinal interaction requires further evaluation.

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by therapeutic drugs

Consistent with its highest abundance in humans, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A is responsible for the metabolism of about 60% of currently known drugs. However, this unusual low substrate specificity also makes CYP3A4 susceptible to reversible or irreversible inhibition by a variety of drugs. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 is characterised by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen (NADPH)-, time- and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYP isoenzymes to reactive metabolites capable of irreversibly binding covalently to CYP3A4. Approaches using in vitro, in silico and in vivo models can be used to study CYP3A4 inactivation by drugs. Human liver microsomes are always used to estimate inactivation kinetic parameters including the concentration required for half-maximal inactivation (K(I)) and the maximal rate of inactivation at saturation (k(inact)). Clinically important mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors include antibacterials (e.g. clarithromycin, erythromycin and isoniazid), anticancer agents (e.g. tamoxifen and irinotecan), anti-HIV agents (e.g. ritonavir and delavirdine), antihypertensives (e.g. dihydralazine, verapamil and diltiazem), sex steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g. gestodene and raloxifene), and several herbal constituents (e.g. bergamottin and glabridin). Drugs inactivating CYP3A4 often possess several common moieties such as a tertiary amine function, furan ring, and acetylene function. It appears that the chemical properties of a drug critical to CYP3A4 inactivation include formation of reactive metabolites by CYP isoenzymes, preponderance of CYP inducers and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, and occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered drugs. Compared with reversible inhibition of CYP3A4, mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 more frequently cause pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions, as the inactivated CYP3A4 has to be replaced by newly synthesised CYP3A4 protein. The resultant drug interactions may lead to adverse drug effects, including some fatal events. For example, when aforementioned CYP3A4 inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, cisapride or astemizole (all CYP3A4 substrates), torsades de pointes (a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation) may occur.However, predicting drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4 inactivation is difficult, since the clinical outcomes depend on a number of factors that are associated with drugs and patients. The apparent pharmacokinetic effect of a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A4 would be a function of its K(I), k(inact) and partition ratio and the zero-order synthesis rate of new or replacement enzyme. The inactivators for CYP3A4 can be inducers and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, confounding in vitro-in vivo extrapolation. The clinical significance of CYP3A inhibition for drug safety and efficacy warrants closer understanding of the mechanisms for each inhibitor. Furthermore, such inactivation may be exploited for therapeutic gain in certain circumstances.

Effects of sex on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of quinidine

AIMS

To investigate the source of the apparent increased susceptibility of women to develop QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes after the administration of drugs that delay cardiac repolarization.

METHODS

Plasma quinidine concentrations and electrocardiographic changes (QRS and QT intervals) were measured over 24 h following the administration of single oral doses of the QT prolonging drug quinidine (3 mg kg(-1)) and compared between 27 male and 21 female healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between males and females in plasma quinidine concentrations or in calculated pharmacokinetic variables. Maximum quinidine concentrations in males and females were 997 +/- 56 and 871 +/- 57 ng ml(-1), respectively (mean difference (-125, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -239, 11 ng ml(-1), P = NS). Quinidine lengthened actual (QTa) and corrected (QTc) QT intervals and the QRS interval to a greater extent in females than males (P < 0.001 for each), but there were no significant sex differences detected in the effects of quinidine on the heart rate corrected JT interval. Maximum prolongation of QTc interval was observed 2 h after quinidine and was significantly greater in women (33 +/- 16 vs 24 +/- 17 ms, mean difference 9 +/- 20 ms, 95% CI 3, 15, P = 0.037). At this time mean differences (95% CI) were 1.0 min(-1) (-2.5, 4.4, P = NS) for heart rate, 5.5 ms (3.5, 7.6, P = 0.05) for the QRS and 3.4 ms (-2.5, 9.3, P = NS) for the JTc intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinidine-induced increases in QTc were larger in females, but no sex differences in quinidine pharmacokinetics were found. The disparity in prolongation of cardiac repolarization is thus due to a pharmacodynamic difference which appears more complex than simply an increase in repolarization delay in females.

Summary of information on human CYP enzymes: human P450 metabolism data

This chapter is an update of the data on substrates, reactions, inducers, and inhibitors of human CYP enzymes published previously by Rendic and DiCarlo (1), now covering selection of the literature through 2001 in the reference section. The data are presented in a tabular form (Table 1) to provide a framework for predicting and interpreting the new P450 metabolic data. The data are formatted in an Excel format as most suitable for off-line searching and management of the Web-database. The data are presented as stated by the author(s) and in the case when several references are cited the data are presented according to the latest published information. The searchable database is available either as an Excel file (for information contact the author), or as a Web-searchable database (Human P450 Metabolism Database, www.gentest.com) enabling the readers easy and quick approach to the latest updates on human CYP metabolic reactions.

Desacetyl-diltiazem displays severalfold higher affinity to CYP2D6 compared with CYP3A4

It has earlier been shown that the isoenzymes CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 are involved in O- and N-demethylation of diltiazem (DTZ), respectively. Apparently, CYP3A4 plays a more prominent role than CYP2D6 in the overall metabolism of DTZ. However, previous observations indicate that the opposite might be true for the pharmacologically active metabolite desacetyl-DTZ (M1). Thus, the aim of the present in vitro investigation was to study the relative affinity of M1 to CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Immortalized human liver epithelial cells transfected with either CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 were used as a model system, and the presence of M1 and its metabolites in the cell culture medium was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography/UV detection both before and following 90 min of incubation. The estimated K(m) value for the CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation of M1 was approximately 5 microM. In comparison, the affinity of M1 to CYP3A4 (N-demethylation) was about 100 times lower (K(m), approximately 540 microM) than to CYP2D6. These in vitro data suggest that M1 metabolism via CYP2D6, in contrast to the parent drug, probably is the preferred pathway in vivo. Metabolism mediated through CYP2D6 is associated with a substantial interindividual variability, and since M1 expresses pharmacological activity, individual CYP2D6 metabolic capacity might be an aspect to consider when using DTZ.

Cardiovascular drug-drug interactions

The drug-drug interactions discussed in this article have either documented or suspected clinical relevance for patients with cardiovascular disease and the clinician involved in the care of these patients. Oftentimes, drug-drug interactions are difficult, if not impossible, to predict because of the high degree of interpatient variability in drug disposition. Certain drug-drug interactions, however, may be avoided through knowledge and sound clinical judgment. Every clinician should maintain a working knowledge of reported drug-drug interactions and an understanding of basic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to help predict and minimize the incidence and severity of drug-drug interactions.

Antiarrhythmic agents: drug interactions of clinical significance

The management of cardiac arrhythmias has grown more complex in recent years. Despite the recent focus on nonpharmacological therapy, most clinical arrhythmias are treated with existing antiarrhythmics. Because of the narrow therapeutic index of antiarrhythmic agents, potential drug interactions with other medications are of major clinical importance. As most antiarrhythmics are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, pharmacokinetic interactions constitute the majority of clinically significant interactions seen with these agents. Antiarrhythmics may be substrates, inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes, and many of these metabolic interactions have been characterised. However, many potential interactions have not, and knowledge of how antiarrhythmic agents are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system may allow clinicians to predict potential interactions. Drug interactions with Vaughn-Williams Class II (beta-blockers) and Class IV (calcium antagonists) agents have previously been reviewed and are not discussed here. Class I agents, which primarily block fast sodium channels and slow conduction velocity, include quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine (lignocaine), mexiletine, flecainide and propafenone. All of these agents except procainamide are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 system and are involved in a number of drug-drug interactions, including over 20 different interactions with quinidine. Quinidine has been observed to inhibit the metabolism of digoxin, tricyclic antidepressants and codeine. Furthermore, cimetidine, azole antifungals and calcium antagonists can significantly inhibit the metabolism of quinidine. Procainamide is excreted via active tubular secretion, which may be inhibited by cimetidine and trimethoprim. Other Class I agents may affect the disposition of warfarin, theophylline and tricyclic antidepressants. Many of these interactions can significantly affect efficacy and/or toxicity. Of the Class III antiarrhythmics, amiodarone is involved in a significant number of interactions since it is a potent inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 enzymes. It can significantly impair the metabolism of digoxin, theophylline and warfarin. Dosages of digoxin and warfarin should empirically be decreased by one-half when amiodarone therapy is added. In addition to pharmacokinetic interactions, many reports describe the use of antiarrhythmic drug combinations for the treatment of arrhythmias. By combining antiarrhythmic drugs and utilising additive electrophysiological/pharmacodynamic effects, antiarrhythmic efficacy may be improved and toxicity reduced. As medication regimens grow more complex with the aging population, knowledge of existing and potential drug-drug interactions becomes vital for clinicians to optimise drug therapy for every patient.

Drug interactions with cisapride: clinical implications

Cisapride, a prokinetic agent, has been used for the treatment of a number of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults and children. Since 1993, 341 cases of ventricular arrhythmias, including 80 deaths, have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Marketing of the drug has now been discontinued in the US; however, it is still available under a limited-access protocol. Knowledge of the risk factors for cisapride-associated arrhythmias will be essential for its continued use in those patients who meet the eligibility criteria. This review summarises the published literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of cisapride with concomitantly administered drugs, providing clinicians with practical recommendations for avoiding these potentially fatal events. Pharmacokinetic interactions with cisapride involve inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the primary mode of elimination of cisapride, thereby increasing plasma concentrations of the drug. The macrolide antibacterials clarithromycin, erythromycin and troleandomycin are inhibitors of CYP3A4 and should not be used in conjunction with cisapride. Azithromycin is an alternative. Similarly, azole antifungal agents such as fluconazole, itraconazole and ketoconazole are CYP3A4 inhibitors and their concomitant use with cisapride should be avoided. Of the antidepressants nefazodone and fluvoxamine should be avoided with cisapride. Data with fluoxetine is controversial, we favour the avoidance of its use. Citalopram, paroxetine and sertraline are alternatives. The HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir inhibit CYP3A4. Clinical experience with cisapride is lacking but avoidance with all protease inhibitors is recommended, although saquinavir is thought to have clinically insignificant effects on CYP3A4. Delavirdine is also a CYP3A4 inhibitor and should be avoided with cisapride. We also recommend avoiding coadministration of cisapride with amiodarone, cimetidine (alternatives are famotidine, nizatidine, ranitidine or one of the proton pump inhibitors), diltiazem and verapamil (the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are alternatives), grapefruit juice, isoniazid, metronidazole, quinine, quinupristin/dalfopristin and zileuton (montelukast is an alternative). Pharmacodynamic interactions with cisapride involve drugs that have the potential to have additive effects on the QT interval. We do not recommend use of cisapride with class Ia and III antiarrhythmic drugs or with adenosine, bepridil, cyclobenzaprine, droperidol, haloperidol, nifedipine (immediate release), phenothiazine antipsychotics, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants or vasopressin. Vigilance is advised if anthracyclines, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, pentamidine or probucol are used with cisapride. In addition, uncorrected electrolyte disturbances induced by diuretics may increase the risk of torsade de pointes. Patients receiving cisapride should be promptly treated for electrolyte disturbances.

In vitro and in vivo drug interactions involving human CYP3A

Cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) is importantly involved in the metabolism of many chemically diverse drugs administered to humans. Moreover, its localization in high amounts both in the small intestinal epithelium and liver makes it a major contributor to presystemic elimination following oral drug administration. Drug interactions involving enzyme inhibition or induction are common following the coadministration of two or more CYP3A substrates. Studies using in vitro preparations are useful in identifying such potential interactions and possibly permitting extrapolation of in vitro findings to the likely in vivo situation. Even if accurate quantitative predictions cannot be made, several classes of drugs can be expected to result in a drug interaction based on clinical experience. In many instances, the extent of such drug interactions is sufficiently pronounced to contraindicate the therapeutic use of the involved drugs.

Itraconazole increases plasma concentrations of quinidine

BACKGROUND

Quinidine is eliminated mainly by CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. Itraconazole interacts with some but not all of the substrates of CYP3A4; it is therefore important to study the possible interaction of itraconazole with quinidine.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study design was used with nine healthy volunteers. Itraconazole (200 mg) or placebo was ingested once a day for 4 days. A single 100 mg oral dose of quinidine sulfate was ingested on day 4. Plasma concentrations of quinidine, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole, as well as cumulative excretion of quinidine into urine, were determined up to 24 hours. The ECG, heart rate, and blood pressure were also recorded up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

On average the peak plasma concentration of quinidine increased to 1.6-fold (p < 0.05), and the area under the concentration-time curve of quinidine increased to 2.4-fold (p < 0.01) by itraconazole. The elimination half-life of quinidine was prolonged 1.6-fold (p < 0.001), and the area under the 3-hydroxyquinidine/quinidine ratio-time curve decreased to one-fifth (p < 0.001) by itraconazole. The renal clearance of quinidine decreased 50% (p < 0.001) by itraconazole, whereas the creatinine clearance was unaffected. The QTc interval correlated with the concentrations of quinidine during both itraconazole and placebo phases (r2 = 0.71 and r2 = 0.79, respectively; p < 0.01), although only minor changes between the phases were observed in other pharmacodynamic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole increases plasma concentrations of oral quinidine, probably by inhibiting the CYP3A4 isozyme during the first-pass and elimination phases of quinidine. The decreased renal clearance of quinidine might be the result of the inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated tubular secretion of quinidine by itraconazole. The concentrations of quinidine should be closely monitored if itraconazole or some other potent CYP3A inhibitors are used with quinidine.

Effects of food and sucralfate on a single oral dose of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin in healthy subjects

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.