Further evaluation on long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and bone mineral density: a longitudinal cohort study

[Contraception for women after 40: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Choosing contraception for women over 40 can be sometimes difficult but it is crucial since fertility and pregnancy's risks still exist. It requires a thorough evaluation of the situation, in order to identify any vascular and metabolic risk factors, along with the uterine and mammary benign pathologies already diagnosed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to elaborate some guidelines for clinical practice regarding contraception's prescription for women over 40.

METHODS

A systematic review of the French and English existing literature was conducted. Pubmed and the Cochrane library were used to identify studies about contraception for perimenopausal women. International guidelines published by scientific societies were also reviewed (RCOG, FSRH, ESHRE, ACOG, WHO, HAS).

RESULTS

No contraceptive methods are contraindicated on the sole basis of age alone. However, because age is a risk factor for vascular and metabolic diseases, combined hormonal contraception and DMPA should not be prescribed at first intention. Copper IUD and progestin-only contraceptives (pill, implant, intrauterine device) should primarily be considered, since they offer good efficacy with lower risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraception for women over 40 should not be put aside. Long acting reversible contraception and progestin-only pill have to be prescribed as first-ine. Contraception is no longer needed for women over 50 who use non-hormonal contraception, after a 12 month-amenorrhea. Patients treated with combined hormonal contraception must stop using it over 50. Measuring hormonal levels while using hormonal contraception is not recommended. An hormonal-contraception-free interval must be considered, while using barrier contraception method. If an ovarian activity persists, a non-hormonal contraception or progestin-only contraception (except for DMPA) should be (re-)established.

Bone mineral density in midlife long-term users of hormonal contraception in South Africa: relationship with obesity and menopausal status

BACKGROUND

In South Africa, hormonal contraception is widely used in women over the age of 40 years. One of these methods and the most commonly used is depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) which has been found to have a negative effect on bone mass. Limited information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in pre and perimenopausal women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study and review associations with body mass index (BMI) and menopausal status.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Menopausal status was assessed, BMI and forearm BMD was measured at the distal radius using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Comparison analysis was conducted at baseline and 2.5 years.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p = 0.26) with and without adjustment for age at baseline or at 2.5 years (p = 0.52). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with BMI (p = < 0.0001) with an increase of one unit of BMI translating to an increase of 0.0044 g/cm2 in radius BMD. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level ≥ 25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH < 25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p = .006).

CONCLUSION

This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects forearm BMD in this population at baseline or after 2.5 years of follow-up. This study also reports the complex relationship and significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD. BMD research in older women needs to ensure that women are assessed for menopausal status and BMI.

Prevalence of Low Bone Mass and Osteoporosis in Long-Term Users of the Injectable Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

BACKGROUND

Bone mineral density (BMD) loss among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users is a controversial issue. Aspects under debate include whether the number of years of use has any effect on continuous BMD loss, whether this loss will stabilise over the years of use or if it will progress to low bone mass, osteoporosis and an increased fracture risk. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in osteoporosis and low bone mass between DMPA and copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) users.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that evaluated BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in 47 long-term DMPA users and 41 Cu-IUD users as control group. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The participants were 27 to 57 years of age, had used either DMPA or a Cu-IUD uninterruptedly for at least ten years, had initiated use of the method prior to 40 years of age and had follicle stimulating hormone values <40 mIU/mL.

RESULTS

Findings showed that 68.1% and 36.6% of the DMPA and Cu-IUD users, respectively, had low bone mass and 29.8% and 2.4% of DMPA and Cu-IUD users, respectively, had osteoporosis. BMD decreased as the number of years of DMPA use increased.

CONCLUSION

Long-term DMPA use was associated with low bone mass and osteoporosis in women who had used the method for 10 years or more. DMPA users with longer time of use showed a greater bone mass loss.

A temporary decrease in mineral density in perinatal mouse long bones

Fetal and postnatal bone development in humans is traditionally viewed as a process characterized by progressively increasing mineral density. Yet, a temporary decrease in mineral density has been described in the long bones of infants in the immediate postnatal period. The mechanism that underlies this phenomenon, as well as its causes and consequences, remain unclear. Using daily μCT scans of murine femora and tibiae during perinatal development, we show that a temporary decrease in tissue mineral density (TMD) is evident in mice. By monitoring spatial and temporal structural changes during normal growth and in a mouse strain in which osteoclasts are non-functional (Src-null), we show that endosteal bone resorption is the main cause for the perinatal decrease in TMD. Mechanical testing revealed that this temporary decrease is correlated with reduced stiffness of the bones. We also show, by administration of a progestational agent to pregnant mice, that the decrease in TMD is not the result of parturition itself. This study provides a comprehensive view of perinatal long bone development in mice, and describes the process as well as the consequences of density fluctuation during this period.

Subcutaneous versus intramuscular depot methoxyprogesterone acetate: a comparative review

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; Depo-Provera) is a highly effective and convenient contraceptive method that has been used worldwide for many decades. Recently, a new lower dose of DMPA, administered as a subcutaneous injection, has been approved for use in the USA as a contraceptive and a treatment for pain associated with endometriosis. The newer formulation has a similar efficacy to the older version and, more importantly, has fewer side effects, with improved user tolerability. Similar to the intramuscular DMPA injection (Depo-Provera intramuscular or contraceptive injection), the subcutaneous injection provides effective contraceptive and pain-management therapy for endometriosis, with a 3-monthly injectable protocol for women who seek long-term and reversible contraception without the need for a daily pill or a more frequent dosing regimen.

Update on hormonal contraception and bone density

Combination hormonal contraception and progestin-only contraception (including depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA]) are effective and convenient forms of reversible contraception that millions of women use worldwide. In recent years, observations of reduced bone mineral density in current users of these methods have led to concerns that this hormone-induced bone loss might translate into long-term increased fracture risk. Special focus has been placed on adolescent users who have not yet attained their peak bone mass as well as perimenopausal users. In 2004, the FDA added a black box warning to DMPA package labeling warning of the risk of significant bone loss and cautioning against long-term use (> 2 years). This article reviews evidence on the use of hormonal contraception and its effect on bone density in adolescent, premenopausal, and perimenopausal populations. Recommendations from reproductive healthcare organizations are reviewed and clinical recommendations are provided.

Bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescents during use of norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives and after discontinuation of norethisterone enanthate

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have been shown to have a negative effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents. The aim of this study was to investigate BMD in 15- to 19-year-old new users of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs.

STUDY DESIGN

This 5-year longitudinal study followed up new users of DMPA (n=115), NET-EN (n=115) and COCs (n=116) and 144 nonuser controls. BMD was measured at the distal radius using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

BMD increased in all groups (annual percent increase: nonusers, 1.49%; DMPA, 1.39%; NET-EN, 1.03%; COCs, 0.84%) during follow-up (p<.001). There was evidence for lower BMD increases per annum in NET-EN (p=.050) and COC (p=.010) users compared to nonusers but no difference between DMPA and nonusers (p=.76). In 14 NET-EN discontinuers, an overall reduction of 0.61% per year BMD was followed upon cessation by an increase of 0.69% per year (p=.066).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that BMD increases in adolescents may be less in NET-EN and COC users; however, recovery of BMD in NET-EN users was found in the small sample of adolescents followed post-discontinuation.

Bone density recovery after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception use

BACKGROUND

While depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a highly effective contraceptive used by millions of women, its use is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss, raising concerns about long-term risk of osteoporosis and/or fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of studies published in PubMed from 1996 to 2006, evaluating changes in BMD after discontinuation of DMPA. Ten primary clinical or observational studies were identified addressing this issue.

RESULTS

BMD consistently returned toward or to baseline values following DMPA discontinuation in women of all ages. This recovery in BMD was seen as early as 24 weeks after stopping therapy and persisted for as long as women were followed up; BMD in past DMPA users was similar to that in nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss occurring with DMPA use is reversible and is not likely to be an important risk factor for low bone density and fractures in older women, although data on fracture risk in DMPA users are lacking.

Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate: an update

OBJECTIVE

Depo-Provera is a contraceptive approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1992 and used worldwide by more than 90 million women.

AIM OF STUDY

Despite the fact that progestins are endogenous hormones that are secreted by the body, its excess might lead to detrimental health effects. Whether progestins as contraceptives are friends or foes is a questionable matter. In this manuscript, we drive the attention to both usage and side effects Depo-Provera.

RESULTS

Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a highly effective, convenient non-daily hormonal contraceptive option that has been available worldwide for many years. The experience with DMPA provides a large body of long-term data regarding the efficacy and safety of this contraceptive method; this long-term experience has established that the use of DMPA does not increase the risk of cardiovascular events, breast cancer, other gynecologic malignancy, or postmenopausal fracture; however, patients are often more concerned about the relatively immediate effects of contraceptives such as potential changes in menstrual cycle, body weight, and mood disturbances.

CONCLUSION

Concerns about such issues may lead to reluctance to initiate therapy or premature discontinuation. Counseling and understanding of women's concerns and experiences using Depo-Provera is important and could help health care providers redesign counseling strategies to improve contraceptive continuation and improve patient adherence.

Bone status after cessation of use of injectable progestin contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Women using injectable progestin contraceptives (IPCs) have lower bone mineral density than nonusers. We assessed whether bone loss is completely reversible after cessation of IPC use, whether different IPCs have different effects and whether effects vary by age at first use.

STUDY DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study in Cape Town, South Africa, 3487 premenopausal black and mixed race women aged 18-44 years were interviewed for information on contraceptive history and risk factors for decreased bone mineral density, and ultrasound measurements of the left calcaneus were taken. Adjusted means of the ultrasound measures for categories of IPC use were obtained using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

Current users of IPCs had the lowest ultrasound measures, while the measures of women who had ceased IPC use at least 2-3 years previously were similar to or greater than those of never users of IPCs. The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone enanthate were similar. The calcaneus measures were unrelated to age at which use began after control for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that bone loss during IPC use is reversible and that this loss of bone is completely recovered several years after cessation of use.

Bone mineral density loss and recovery during 48 months in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare changes in bone mineral density (BMD) during 48 months between first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) users, during use and after discontinuation, to controls.

DESIGN

Longitudinal study.

SETTING

Academic community.

PATIENT(S)

Women 18-35 years, newly initiating depot MPA (n = 178) and controls (n = 145) not using hormonal contraception.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The BMD of the hip and spine, measured at 3-month intervals, by dual energy roentgen absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Hip and spine BMD declined during 48 months of depot MPA use by 7.7% +/- 0.11% (mean +/- SE) and 6.4% +/- 0.36%, respectively. The BMD of controls declined <or=1.6% +/- 0.30%. Hip and spine BMD loss slowed to <0.6% after 48 months of depot MPA use. After discontinuation, BMD increased from 0.3% to 2.0% per year depending on length of depot MPA use and bone site. The longest depot MPA users remained 4.7% and 2.9% lower than hip and spine baseline values, respectively, 18 months after discontinuation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Depot MPA-related BMD loss is substantial but occurs mostly during the first 2 years of DMPA use. Therefore, longer use may not substantially increase the risk of osteoporosis. The prolonged recovery time suggests the need to consider timing of use in relation to menopause or other factors that may impede bone remodeling.

Contraceptive care for the adolescent

Despite recent improvements in rates of teen pregnancy, abortion, birth,and contraceptive use, effective contraceptive counseling for adolescents should be a high priority for the primary care provider in the office setting. Adolescent psychosocial risk screening and appropriate counseling about sexual decision-making is necessary. Contraceptive services visits include, relevant history, limited physical examination, provision of information, anticipatory guidance about sexual behaviors, and the provision of contraceptive methods. Teens should always be encouraged to use a male condom during sex to reduce STI risk. A variety of barrier and hormonal contraceptive methods are available for the adolescent population. Education about and provision of EC is effective in reducing the rate of unintended pregnancy and abortion in the United States. Contraceptive care for adolescents is a rewarding experience for primary care providers.

Effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as hormonal contraceptive on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling

PURPOSE AND METHOD

Our objective is to evaluate the effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) as a method of contraception on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling. Forty women (21-44 years old) who used DMPA for contraception for <1, 1-2 and >5 years, in addition to 20 age-matched healthy women (nonusers), participated in this study. Lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptionmetry. Serum osteocalcin (OC), a bone formation marker, was measured by enzyme amplification sorbent immunoassay. Urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), a bone resorption marker, was determined by enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Serum OC and urinary DPD levels in women who used DMPA for <1, 1-2 and >5 years were significantly increased compared to the corresponding levels in nonusers. The increase of both biomarkers was more pronounced with longer duration of use. LS-BMD was significantly decreased in women on long-term DMPA use compared to LS-BMD in nonusers. The mean percentage decrease of LS-BMD in women who used DMPA for 1-2 and >5 years was 9% and 11.8%, respectively. LS-BMD was negatively correlated with serum OC and urinary DPD in women who used DMPA. On the other hand, LS-BMD and bone turnover were not significantly different between women who used DMPA for <1 year and nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of DMPA (>2 years) had a significant adverse effect on BMD and induced increased bone turnover, as evidenced by a significant increase in biochemical indices of bone formation and resorption. The measurement of LS-BMD and of biomarkers of bone turnover may be recommended in women aged above 40 years and who used DMPA for a long duration (2-5 years).

Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review

Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.

Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians

Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease characterized by the presence and proliferation of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, which occurs in approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. In this estrogen-dependent disorder, lesions become inactive and gradually undergo regression during states of ovarian down-regulation, such as amenorrhoea or menopause. The impact of endometriosis includes impaired fertility potential, as well as symptoms of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pain, all of which adversely affect quality of life. Management of endometriosis focuses on pain relief and includes medical and surgical treatment. Pharmacologic therapies currently in use include combination oral contraceptives (COCs), danazol, GnRH analogues and progestins. Although some agents show efficacy in relieving pain, all differ in their side effects, making it difficult to achieve a balance between efficacy and safety. Efficacy has been demonstrated with danazol or GnRH analogues; however, treatment is limited to 6 months because of significant metabolic side effects. Alternatives for longer-term management of symptoms include add-back therapy with GnRH analogues, COCs or progestins. Newer options for treatment of endometriosis include depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injection, as well as several agents under investigation that may prove to have therapeutic potential.

Bone mineral density in women aged 40–49 years using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enanthate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

Most studies show that depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has a negative effect on bone mass. There are conflicting reports with respect to recovery of bone mass with long-term use of DMPA. No information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in older women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study. One-hundred twenty-seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Bone mineral density was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry. There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p=.26) with and without adjustment for age. Although a small decrease in BMD was noted in the age range of 40-49 years, this was not statistically significant (p=.7). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p<or=.0001) at both measurement sites, with an increase of one unit of BMI translating to an increase of 0.0044 g/cm2 in radius BMD. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level >or=25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH <25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p=.006). This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects BMD in this population.

Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Women, aged 18 to 35, choosing DMPA for contraception (n = 178) and women using no hormonal contraception (n = 145).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hip and spine BMD measured, at three-month intervals for 24 months, by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULT(S)

Mean hip BMD declined 2.8% (SE = 0.034) 12 months following DMPA initiation and 5.8% (SE = 0.096) after 24 months. Mean spine (L1-L3) BMD declined 3.5% (SE = 0.022) and 5.7% (SE = 0.034), respectively, after one and two years of DMPA use. Mean hip and spine BMD of control participants changed less than 0.9% over the same period. Among DMPA users, body mass index (BMI) change was inversely associated with BMD change at the hip, but not at the spine. Calcium intake, physical activity, and smoking did not influence BMD change in either group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hip and spine BMD declined after one DMPA injection and this decline continued with each subsequent injection for 24 months. With the exception of increasing BMI among DMPA users, no user characteristics offered protection against DMPA-related BMD loss.

Bone mineral density in lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Estrogen deficiency and pulmonary diseases are associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a disorder affecting women that is characterized by cystic lung lesions, is frequently treated with antiestrogen therapy, i.e., progesterone and/or oophorectomy. Therefore, we evaluated BMD yearly in 211 LAM patients to determine the prevalence of BMD abnormalities, whether antiestrogen therapy decreased BMD, and if treatment with bisphosphonates prevented bone loss. Abnormal BMD was found in 70% of the patients and correlated with severity of lung disease and age. Greater severity of lung disease, menopause, and oophorectomy were associated with greater decline in BMD. After adjusting for differences in initial lung function and BMD, we found similar rates of BMD decline in progesterone-treated (n = 122) and untreated patients (n = 89). After similar adjustments, we found that bisphosphonate-treated patients (n = 98) had lower rates of decline in lumbar spine BMD (-0.004 +/- 0.003 vs. -0.015 +/- 0.003 gm/cm(2), p = 0.036) and T-scores (-0.050 +/- 0.041 vs. -0.191 +/- 0.041, p < 0.001) than untreated patients (n = 113). We conclude that abnormal BMD was frequent in LAM. Progesterone therapy was not associated with changes in BMD; bisphosphonate therapy was associated with lower rates of bone loss. We recommend systematic evaluation of BMD and early treatment with bisphosphonates for patients with LAM.

Effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density after 24 months of use

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effect of 24 months of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use on bone mineral density compared with oral contraception (pills) and nonhormonal contraception.

METHODS

Women aged 18-33 years self-selected oral contraception, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, or nonhormonal contraception (controls). Those selecting pills were randomized to formulations containing either 35 microg ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone or 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel. Controls were frequency matched on age and race/ethnicity to hormonal contraception users. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) was performed at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Percent change in bone mineral density was analyzed by using analysis of covariance, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, weight-bearing exercise, calcium intake, smoking status, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Of the 191 women making up the final sample, 86 used pills, 47 used depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 58 used nonhormonal contraception. Women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for 24 months experienced, on average, a 5.7% loss in bone mineral density, with a 3.2% loss occurring between months 12 and 24. On average, users of desogestrel pills experienced a 2.6% loss in bone mineral density after 24 months. Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons demonstrated that bone mineral density changes from baseline to 24 months among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users differed significantly from changes experienced by either of the pill groups or the control group. Changes in bone mineral density among users of either pill did not significantly differ from each other or from controls.

CONCLUSION

Loss of bone mineral density associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use appears to be linear during the first 2 years of use. Shifts in bone mineral density among pill users were not significant when compared with controls.

Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To create an evidence-based position statement regarding the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

DESIGN

The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) enlisted clinicians and researchers acknowledged to be experts in the field of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms to review the evidence obtained from the medical literature and develop a document for final approval by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

For mild hot flashes, lifestyle-related strategies such as keeping the core body temperature cool, participating in regular exercise, and using paced respiration have shown some efficacy without adverse effects. Among nonprescription remedies, clinical trial results are insufficient to either support or refute efficacy for soy foods and isoflavone supplements (from either soy or red clover), black cohosh, or vitamin E; however, no serious side effects have been associated with short-term use of these therapies. Single clinical trials have found no benefit for dong quai, evening primrose oil, ginseng, a Chinese herbal mixture, acupuncture, or magnet therapy. Few data support the efficacy of topical progesterone cream; safety concerns should be the same as for other progestogen preparations. No clinical trials have been conducted on the use of licorice for hot flashes. Among nonhormonal prescription options, the antidepressants venlafaxine, paroxetine, and fluoxetine and the anticonvulsant gabapentin have demonstrated some efficacy for treating hot flashes and were well tolerated. Two antihypertensive agents, clonidine and methyldopa, have shown modest efficacy but with a relatively high rate of adverse effects. For moderate to severe hot flashes, systemic estrogen therapy, either alone (ET) or combined with progestogen (EPT) or in the form of estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives, has been shown to significantly reduce hot flash frequency and severity. Clinical trials have associated ET/EPT with adverse effects, including breast cancer, stroke, and thromboembolism. Several progestogens (both oral and intramuscular formulations) have shown efficacy in treating hot flashes, including women with a history of breast cancer, although no definitive data are available on long-term safety in these women.

CONCLUSIONS

In women who need relief for mild vasomotor symptoms, NAMS recommends first considering lifestyle changes, either alone or combined with a nonprescription remedy, such as dietary isoflavones, black cohosh, or vitamin E. Prescription systemic estrogen-containing products remain the therapeutic standard for moderate to severe menopause-related hot flashes. Recommended options for women with concerns or contraindications relating to estrogen-containing treatments include prescription progestogens, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, or gabapentin. Clinicians are advised to enlist women's participation in decision making when weighing the benefits, harms, and scientific uncertainties of therapeutic options. Regardless of the management strategy adopted, treatment should be periodically reassessed as menopause-related vasomotor symptoms will abate over time without any intervention in most women.

Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (Depo-Provera): a highly effective contraceptive option with proven long-term safety

Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera(R)) is a highly effective, nondaily hormonal contraceptive option that has been available in the United States for a decade, and worldwide for 40 years. Benefits and risks of hormonal therapy are often under scrutiny; however, long-term clinical experience has established the safety of this long-acting contraceptive. This article reviews the contraceptive efficacy, potential noncontraceptive health benefits and long-term safety of with regard to risk of cardiovascular events, breast and gynecologic malignancy and osteopenia. Comparisons with other hormonal contraceptives are made as clinically appropriate. Common patient management issues, including effects on menstrual cycle, body weight and mood, are also addressed. Finally, this review provides recommendations for appropriate patient selection.

Controversies in adolescent hormonal contraception

Unintended pregnancy and abortion rates among US adolescents remain high although hormonal contraception is safe and effective in this population. Controversies affecting the provision of hormonal contraception for adolescents include the side effects of oral contraceptives, the possibility that progestin-only injectables lead to decreased bone health, and debate as to whether emergency contraception should be available to teens without a prescription. Each of these issues is addressed with a review of relevant literature.

Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception may decrease bone density and increase the risk for osteoporosis in later life. Prospective data are scarce, especially of the effects of DMPA discontinuation on bone.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1999, we conducted a population-based prospective cohort study among women enrollees of a Washington State health maintenance organization. We enrolled 457 nonpregnant women, ages 18-39 years (183 DMPA users and 274 non-users). Bone density was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry every 6 months for 3 years.

RESULTS

Bone density decreased notably among DMPA-exposed women at the spine (adjusted mean bone density was -0.0053 gm/cm for DMPA users compared with +0.0023 gm/cm for non-users for each 6-month interval) and total hip (-0.0060 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). This represents an annualized mean rate of change at the spine of -0.87% compared with +0.40% and, at the hip, -1.12% compared with -0.05%. Discontinuers of this method (N = 110) showed sizable increases in bone density over comparison women (for each 6-month interval, adjusted mean spine bone density was +0.0067 gm/cm compared with +0.0023 gm/cm, respectively; adjusted mean hip bone density was +0.0035 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). Estimated annualized mean rates of change were +1.41% compared with +0.40% [corrected] at the spine and +1.03% [corrected] compared with -0.05% at the hip. After 30 months, mean bone density for discontinuers was similar to that of non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, DMPA use was strongly associated with bone density loss. Substantial postdiscontinuation recovery of bone provides evidence that the effects may be largely reversible.