Endothelin-1 attenuates bradykinin-induced hypotension in rats

Effect of rosmarinic acid on the arterial blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive rats: Role of ACE

BACKGROUND

In recent years, it has been demonstrated the inhibitory effect of some plant species on the angiotensin-converting enzyme and rosmarinic acid is a prominent constituent of these species.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

This study was carried out to verify the effect of rosmarinic acid on blood pressure through inhibitory activity on angiotensin-converting enzyme in rats.

STUDY DESIGN

The arterial hypertension was promoted using 2-kidneys 1-clip model in rats. The potential inhibitory rosmarinic acid effect on angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was compared with captopril actions by analyzing in vivo blood pressure dose-response curves to angiotensin I and bradykinin. The in vitro plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was measured by fluorimetry using the substrate Abz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH substrate. In addition, dosages of nitrite/nítrate analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

(1) rosmarinic acid caused systolic blood pressure dose-dependent decrease in hypertensive rats; (2) The angiotensin I dose-response curves demonstrated that rosmarinic acid promotes minor changes in systolic blood pressure only in the hypertensive group; (3) The bradykinin dose-response curves showed that both rosmarinic acid and captopril promoted a systolic blood pressure reduction, but only the captopril effect was significant; (4) The angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in rat lung tissue was inhibited by the rosmarinic acid in a dose dependent manner; (5) The analysis of nitrite/nítrate plasma concentrations showed no significant difference among the experimental groups.

CONCLUSION

The rosmarinic acid is effective in reducing blood pressure, selectively, only in hypertensive animals. The rosmarinic acid (173µM) promoted almost a 98.96% reduction on angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.

Chronic treatment with quercetin does not inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme in vivo or in vitro

The precise mechanisms explaining the anti-hypertensive effects produced by quercetin are not fully known. Here, we tested the hypothesis that chronic quercetin treatment inhibits the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). We examined whether quercetin treatment for 14 days reduces in vivo responses to angiotensin I or enhances the responses to bradykinin in anaesthetised rats. We measured the changes in systemic arterial pressure induced by angiotensin I in doses of 0.03-10 μg/kg, by angiotensin II in doses of 0.01-3 μg/kg, and to bradykinin in doses of 0.03-10 μg/kg in anaesthetised rats pre-treated with vehicle (controls), or daily quercetin 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally for 14 days, or a single i.v. dose of captopril 2 mg/kg. Plasma ACE activity was determined by a fluorometric method. Plasma quercetin concentrations were assessed by high performance liquid chromatography. Quercetin treatment induced no significant changes in the hypertensive responses to angiotensin I and angiotensin II, as well in the hypotensive responses to bradykinin (all p>0.05). Conversely, as expected, a single dose of captopril inhibited the hypertensive responses to angiotensin I and potentiated the bradykinin responses (all p<0.01), while no change was found in the vascular responses to angiotensin II (all p>0.05). In addition, although we found significant amounts of quercetin in plasma samples (mean=206 ng/mL), no significant differences were found in plasma ACE activity in rats treated with quercetin compared with those found in the control group (50±6 his-leu nmol/min/mL and 40±7 his-leu nmol/min/mL, respectively; p>0.05). These findings provide strong evidence indicating that quercetin does not inhibit ACE in vivo or in vitro and indicate that other mechanisms are probably involved in the antihypertensive and protective cardiovascular effects associated with quercetin.

Effect of valsartan and captopril in rabbit carotid injury. Possible involvement of bradykinin in the antiproliferative action of the renin-angiotensin blockade

The effects of the specific angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1-receptor blocker valsartan on events related to restenosis were investigated in rabbits after common carotid balloon injury. Six animals were given valsartan from two days prior to injury until 14 days post-injury. Three control groups (n=6 in each group) were either sham-operated, untreated or treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor,captopril. Both ACE inhibition and AT,-receptor blockade had marked effects on plasma levels of endothelin ET1, thromboxane TXB2 and 6-keto-PGF1-alpha. The most dramatic effects on ET, levels were seen in rabbits treated with valsartan, where levels were reduced to values close to those for sham-operated animals (96.85 vs. 86.45 pg/ml). Captopril treatment led to a statistically significant (p<0.01) reduction in ET1 levels compared with untreated animals, but the reduction was only about half that seen with AT1-receptor blockade. TXB2 levels doubled (202.58 vs.413.28 pg/ml) upon arterial injury in control animals but rose by only 20-35% in rabbits treated with captopril (246.45 pg/ml) or valsartan (268.13). In untreated animals, 6-keto-PGF1-alpha levels decreased slightly after injury, but for both the captopril and valsartan groups, there were significant increases in levels of this prostaglandin derivative, effects attributed to the action of bradykinins. Levels were highest in the captopril-treated animals. Valsartan and captopril treatment led to a significant reduction in neointimal thickness and the extent of lumen stenosis compared with untreated animals. Both treatments were effective in reducing neointimal area and significantly (p<0.05)reduced cell proliferation. The differences between treatments can be attributed to the different actions of the agents, as valsartan leaves the AT2-receptor unblocked, while captopril, through inhibition of Ang II synthesis, prevents stimulation of both receptors.A combination of both treatments may be a possible way forward in the clinical prevention of restenosis.

Acute administration of nicotine impairs the hypotensive responses to bradykinin in rats

Nicotine may contribute to smoking-induced endothelial dysfunction because of its ability to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. We investigated whether the acute administration of nicotine changes the hypotensive responses to bradykinin in rats. The effects of pre-treatment with losartan or enalapril on the nicotine-induced changes in the responses to bradykinin were also evaluated. In study 1, anesthetized rats were cannulated via carotid artery for the measurement of mean arterial pressure. Dose-response curves to bradykinin (0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.4, 25 and 100 microg/kg) were generated before and 10 min after the injection of nicotine (200 microg/kg, i.v.) or saline. The individual dose-response curves were fitted to a four-parameter logistic equation using the ALLFIT program, which provided an estimate of the maximal response (E(max)) and of the dose of bradykinin producing the half-maximal response (ED(50)). In study 2, rats were pre-treated orally with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) or enalapril maleate (25 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks. Control rats received tap water alone. After pre-treatment, the rats were anesthetized and used as described in study 1. Nicotine decreased the E(max) (from 73.0+/-7.5 to 65.7+/-3.3 mm Hg; P<0.05) but did not affect the ED(50). In study 2, losartan or enalapril did not affect nicotine-induced decrease in responses to bradykinin; E(max) decreased in both groups (from 68.7+/-6.3 to 62.8+/-4.2 mm Hg, and from 53.8+/-13.0 to 43.1+/-7.1 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.05) without significantly changing the ED(50). These results suggest that nicotine impairs the endothelium-dependent hypotensive responses to bradykinin. This effect is not influenced by inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme or by blockade of the angiotensin AT(1) receptors.