Trafficking of green fluorescent protein-tagged muscarinic M4 receptors in NG108-15 cells

Immunocytochemistry of Acutely Isolated Adrenal Medullary Chromaffin Cells

Immunocytochemistry enables the detection and localization of proteins in cells that are acutely dissociated or in culture. There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of cultured cells for immunocytochemistry. One of the advantages is that cultured cells can be used for one or more weeks after the dissociation of cells, whereas one of the disadvantages is that the properties of cells in culture might change under artificial conditions. On the other hand, acutely dissociated cells are expected to have the original properties of cells because almost all procedures before fixation, except for enzymatic digestion, are carried out at low temperatures. Here, we describe how adrenal medullary cells of small animals are acutely dissociated for immunostaining.

Knock-In Mouse Models to Investigate the Functions of Opioid Receptors in vivo

Due to their low expression levels, complex multi-pass transmembrane structure, and the current lack of highly specific antibodies, the assessment of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains challenging. While most of the research regarding their functions was performed in heterologous systems overexpressing the receptor, recent advances in genetic engineering methods have allowed the generation of several unique mouse models. These animals proved to be useful to investigate numerous aspects underlying the physiological functions of GPCRs, including their endogenous expression, distribution, interactome, and trafficking processes. Given their significant pharmacological importance and central roles in the nervous system, opioid peptide receptors (OPr) are often referred to as prototypical receptors for the study of GPCR regulatory mechanisms. Although only a few GPCR knock-in mouse lines have thus far been generated, OPr are strikingly well represented with over 20 different knock-in models, more than half of which were developed within the last 5 years. In this review, we describe the arsenal of OPr (mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid), as well as the opioid-related nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor knock-in mouse models that have been generated over the past years. We further highlight the invaluable contribution of such models to our understanding of the in vivo mechanisms underlying the regulation of OPr, which could be conceivably transposed to any other GPCR, as well as the limitations, future perspectives, and possibilities enabled by such tools.

The Delta-Opioid Receptor; a Target for the Treatment of Pain

Nowadays, pain represents one of the most important societal burdens. Current treatments are, however, too often ineffective and/or accompanied by debilitating unwanted effects for patients dealing with chronic pain. Indeed, the prototypical opioid morphine, as many other strong analgesics, shows harmful unwanted effects including respiratory depression and constipation, and also produces tolerance, physical dependence, and addiction. The urgency to develop novel treatments against pain while minimizing adverse effects is therefore crucial. Over the years, the delta-opioid receptor (DOP) has emerged as a promising target for the development of new pain therapies. Indeed, targeting DOP to treat chronic pain represents a timely alternative to existing drugs, given the weak unwanted effects spectrum of DOP agonists. Here, we review the current knowledge supporting a role for DOP and its agonists for the treatment of pain. More specifically, we will focus on the cellular and subcellular localization of DOP in the nervous system. We will also discuss in further detail the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in controlling the cellular trafficking of DOP, known to differ significantly from most G protein-coupled receptors. This review article will allow a better understanding of how DOP represents a promising target to develop new treatments for pain management as well as where we stand as of our ability to control its cellular trafficking and cell surface expression.

Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors

Opioids are among the most effective analgesics available and are the first choice in the treatment of acute severe pain. However, partial efficacy, a tendency to produce tolerance, and a host of ill-tolerated side effects make clinically available opioids less effective in the management of chronic pain syndromes. Given that most therapeutic opioids produce their actions via µ-opioid receptors (MOPrs), other targets are constantly being explored, among which δ-opioid receptors (DOPrs) are being increasingly considered as promising alternatives. This review addresses DOPrs from the perspective of cellular and molecular determinants of their pharmacological diversity. Thus, DOPr ligands are examined in terms of structural and functional variety, DOPrs' capacity to engage a multiplicity of canonical and noncanonical G protein-dependent responses is surveyed, and evidence supporting ligand-specific signaling and regulation is analyzed. Pharmacological DOPr subtypes are examined in light of the ability of DOPr to organize into multimeric arrays and to adopt multiple active conformations as well as differences in ligand kinetics. Current knowledge on DOPr targeting to the membrane is examined as a means of understanding how these receptors are especially active in chronic pain management. Insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of pharmacological diversity should guide the rational design of more effective, longer-lasting, and better-tolerated opioid analgesics for chronic pain management.

Fluorescent knock-in mice to decipher the physiopathological role of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate most physiological functions but are also critically involved in numerous pathological states. Approximately a third of marketed drugs target GPCRs, which places this family of receptors in the main arena of pharmacological pre-clinical and clinical research. The complexity of GPCR function demands comprehensive appraisal in native environment to collect in-depth knowledge of receptor physiopathological roles and assess the potential of therapeutic molecules. Identifying neurons expressing endogenous GPCRs is therefore essential to locate them within functional circuits whereas GPCR visualization with subcellular resolution is required to get insight into agonist-induced trafficking. Both remain frequently poorly investigated because direct visualization of endogenous receptors is often hampered by the lack of appropriate tools. Also, monitoring intracellular trafficking requires real-time visualization to gather in-depth knowledge. In this context, knock-in mice expressing a fluorescent protein or a fluorescent version of a GPCR under the control of the endogenous promoter not only help to decipher neuroanatomical circuits but also enable real-time monitoring with subcellular resolution thus providing invaluable information on their trafficking in response to a physiological or a pharmacological challenge. This review will present the animal models and discuss their contribution to the understanding of the physiopathological role of GPCRs. We will also address the drawbacks associated with this methodological approach and browse future directions.

Recent advances on the δ opioid receptor: from trafficking to function

Within the opioid family of receptors, δ (DOPrs) and μ opioid receptors (MOPrs) are typical GPCRs that activate canonical second-messenger signalling cascades to influence diverse cellular functions in neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. These receptors activate well-known pathways to influence ion channel function and pathways such as the map kinase cascade, AC and PI3K. In addition new information regarding opioid receptor-interacting proteins, downstream signalling pathways and resultant functional effects has recently come to light. In this review, we will examine these novel findings focusing on the DOPr and, in doing so, will contrast and compare DOPrs with MOPrs in terms of differences and similarities in function, signalling pathways, distribution and interactions. We will also discuss and clarify issues that have recently surfaced regarding the expression and function of DOPrs in different cell types and analgesia.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

Activation of spinal mu- and delta-opioid receptors potently inhibits substance P release induced by peripheral noxious stimuli

Over the past few years, δ-opioid receptors (DOPRs) and μ-opioid receptors (MOPRs) have been shown to interact with each other. We have previously seen that expression of MOPR is essential for morphine and inflammation to potentiate the analgesic properties of selective DOPR agonists. In vivo, it is not clear whether MOPRs and DOPRs are expressed in the same neurons. Indeed, it was recently proposed that these receptors are segregated in different populations of nociceptors, with MOPRs and DOPRs expressed by peptidergic and nonpeptidergic fibers, respectively. In the present study, the role and the effects of DOPR- and MOPR-selective agonists in two different pain models were compared. Using preprotachykinin A knock-out mice, we first confirmed that substance P partly mediates intraplantar formalin- and capsaicin-induced pain behaviors. These mice had a significant reduction in pain behavior compared with wild-type mice. We then measured the effects of intrathecal deltorphin II (DOPR agonist) and DAMGO (MOPR agonist) on pain-like behavior, neuronal activation, and substance P release following formalin and capsaicin injection. We found that both agonists were able to decrease formalin- and capsaicin-induced pain, an effect that was correlated with a reduction in the number of c-fos-positive neurons in the superficial laminae of the lumbar spinal cord. Finally, visualization of NK(1) (neurokinin 1) receptor internalization revealed that DOPR and MOPR activation strongly reduced formalin- and capsaicin-induced substance P release via direct action on primary afferent fibers. Together, our results indicate that functional MOPRs and DOPRs are both expressed by peptidergic nociceptors.

Differential distributions and trafficking properties of dopamine D1 and D5 receptors in nerve cells

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possible differential trafficking properties of the dopamine D1-like receptor subtypes, D1 receptor and D5 receptor.

METHODS

To visualize distributions of dopamine D1-like receptor subtypes at subcellular level, the yellow and cyan variants of green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used to tag D1 and D5 receptors. After transfection with the tagged dopamine receptors, the neuroblastoma cells NG108-15 were treated with D1 agonist SKF38393 or acetylcholine (ACh). Then we observed the subcellular distributions of the tagged receptors under the confocal microscopy and tried to determine trafficking properties by comparing their distribution patterns before and after the drug treatment.

RESULTS

In resting conditions, D1 receptors located in the plasma membrane of NG108-15 cells, while D5 receptors located in both plasma membrane and cytosol. With the pre-treatment of SKF38393, the subcellular distribution of D1 receptors was changed. The yellow particle-like fluorescence of tagged D1 receptors appeared in the cytosol, indicating that D1 receptors were internalized into cytosol from the cell surface. Same situation also occurred in ACh pre-treatment. In contrast, the subcellular distribution of D5 receptors was not changed after SKF38393 or ACh treatment, indicating that D5R was not translocated to cell surface. Interestingly, when D1 and D5 receptors were co-expressed in the same cell, both kept their distinct subcellular distribution patterns and the trafficking properties.

CONCLUSION

Our present study reveals that in NG108-15 nerve cells, dopamine D1 and D5 receptors exhibit differential subcellular distribution patterns, and only D1 receptor has a marked trafficking response to the drug stimulation. We further discuss the potential role of the differential trafficking properties of D1-like receptors in complex modulation of DA signaling.

Effects of synaptotagmin reveal two distinct mechanisms of agonist-stimulated internalization of the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

1. Synaptotagmin has been reported to function in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Here, we investigated its involvement in agonist-stimulated internalization of M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors exogenously expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293 tsA201) cells. 2. Synaptotagmin I was present at low levels in these cells, and when overexpressed resided at the plasma membrane. 3. Synaptotagmin overexpression alone did not affect receptor internalization, but 'rescued' internalization that had been inhibited by either dominant-negative dynamin-1 or dominant-negative arrestin-2. Both normal and 'rescued' internalization were sensitive to inhibitors of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, but not to inhibitors of the function of caveolae. 4. There was no increase in AP-2 recruitment to the plasma membrane in cells overexpressing synaptotagmin. However, a mutant form of the receptor lacking a potential AP-2 recruitment motif, while being internalized normally in response to agonist stimulation, was not rescued by synaptotagmin in cells expressing dominant-negative dynamin or arrestin. 5. A mutant form of synaptotagmin (K326,327A), which binds phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) much more weakly than the wild-type protein, did not rescue internalization. Furthermore, internalization was inhibited by the PH domain of phospholipase C-delta1, which sequesters PIP2, and synaptotagmin was now unable to rescue. 6. We propose that AP-2 binding to the C-terminal tail of the receptor is not normally required for its endocytosis, but that the synaptotagmin-mediated rescue involves the formation of a ternary complex with the receptor and AP-2. PIP2 might play a role as an intermediary in the formation of this complex.

Green fluorescent proteins in receptor research: An emerging tool for drug discovery

In the last five years, green fluorescent protein (GFP) has emerged from being a mere curiosity to become a reliable tool for molecular pharmacological research. GFP produces an intense and stable green fluorescence noncatalytically by absorbing blue light maximally at 395 nm and emitting green light with a peak at 509 nm. It consists of 238 amino acids and its molecular mass is 27-30 kDa. GFP fluorescence occurs without cofactors and this property allows GFP fluorescence to be utilised in nonnative organisms, wherein it can be used as a reporter. This use of GFP permits real-time analysis of receptor dynamics. The emitted fluorescence can be used as a nontoxic marker and detected using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), thus avoiding any staining procedure, expensive mRNA analysis or hazardous radiolabeled binding assays. The potential value of GFP has also been recognized in orphan receptor research, where various GFP-tagged therapeutic proteins have been constructed in an attempt to identify the endogenous ligand(s). These chimeric proteins have been used to determine the site and time course of receptor expression and to relate receptor dynamics with therapeutic outcome. The preparation of new GFP constructs for identifying germ layer cells (endodermal, ectodermal, and mesodermal), as well as neuronal, haematopoietic, endothelial, and cartilage cells, has provided a useful battery of tissue/receptor-specific screening assays for new chemical entities. Genetically engineered cells with GFP expression have provided a valuable tool for automated analysis, and can be adapted for high-throughput systems. GFP is being increasingly utilised for the study of receptor dynamics, where, having already proved beneficial, it will likely continue to contribute towards the search for new classes of drugs, as well as to "de-orphaning" orphan receptors.

Syncollin inhibits regulated corticotropin secretion from AtT-20 cells through a reduction in the secretory vesicle population

Syncollin is a 13 kDa protein that is highly expressed in the exocrine pancreas. Syncollin normally exists as a doughnut-shaped homo-oligomer (quite probably a hexamer) in close association with the luminal surface of the zymogen granule membrane. In the present study, we examine the effect of expression of syncollin in AtT-20 neuroendocrine cells, which do not normally express this protein. Efficient expression was achieved by infection of the cells with adenoviral constructs encoding either untagged or GFP (green fluorescent protein)-tagged syncollin. Both forms of the protein were sorted into corticotropin (ACTH)-positive secretory vesicles present mainly at the tips of cell processes. Neither form affected basal corticotropin secretion or the constitutive secretion of exogenously expressed secreted alkaline phosphatase. In contrast, regulated secretion of corticotropin was inhibited (by 49%) by untagged but not by GFP-tagged syncollin. In parallel, untagged syncollin caused a 46% reduction in the number of secretory vesicles present at the tips of the cell processes. Syncollin-GFP was without effect. We could also show that native syncollin purified from rat pancreas was capable of permeabilizing erythrocytes. We suggest that syncollin may induce uncontrolled permeabilization of corticotropin-containing vesicles and subsequently destabilize them. Both forms of syncollin were tightly membrane-associated and appeared to exist as homooligomers. Hence, the lack of effect of syncollin-GFP on regulated exocytosis suggests that the GFP tag interferes in a subtler manner with the properties of the assembled protein.