Ras-dependent cell cycle commitment during G2 phase

Polyploid giant cancer cells and cancer progression

Polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) are an important feature of cellular atypia, the detailed mechanisms of their formation and function remain unclear. PGCCs were previously thought to be derived from repeated mitosis/cytokinesis failure, with no intrinsic ability to proliferate and divide. However, recently, PGCCs have been confirmed to have cancer stem cell (CSC)-like characteristics, and generate progeny cells through asymmetric division, which express epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers to promote invasion and migration. The formation of PGCCs can be attributed to multiple stimulating factors, including hypoxia, chemotherapeutic reagents, and radiation, can induce the formation of PGCCs, by regulating the cell cycle and cell fusion-related protein expression. The properties of CSCs suggest that PGCCs can be induced to differentiate into non-tumor cells, and produce erythrocytes composed of embryonic hemoglobin, which have a high affinity for oxygen, and thereby allow PGCCs survival from the severe hypoxia. The number of PGCCs is associated with metastasis, chemoradiotherapy resistance, and recurrence of malignant tumors. Targeting relevant proteins or signaling pathways related with the formation and transdifferentiation of adipose tissue and cartilage in PGCCs may provide new strategies for solid tumor therapy.

Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Growth Factor-Induced Cell Signaling

The cell cycle is the series of events that take place in a cell, which drives it to divide and produce two new daughter cells. The typical cell cycle in eukaryotes is composed of the following phases: G1, S, G2, and M phase. Cell cycle progression is mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and their regulatory cyclin subunits. However, the driving force of cell cycle progression is growth factor-initiated signaling pathways that control the activity of various Cdk–cyclin complexes. While the mechanism underlying the role of growth factor signaling in G1 phase of cell cycle progression has been largely revealed due to early extensive research, little is known regarding the function and mechanism of growth factor signaling in regulating other phases of the cell cycle, including S, G2, and M phase. In this review, we briefly discuss the process of cell cycle progression through various phases, and we focus on the role of signaling pathways activated by growth factors and their receptor (mostly receptor tyrosine kinases) in regulating cell cycle progression through various phases.

Cell cycle proliferation decisions: the impact of single cell analyses

Cell proliferation is a fundamental requirement for organismal development and homeostasis. The mammalian cell division cycle is tightly controlled to ensure complete and precise genome duplication and segregation of replicated chromosomes to daughter cells. The onset of DNA replication marks an irreversible commitment to cell division, and the accumulated efforts of many decades of molecular and cellular studies have probed this cellular decision, commonly called the restriction point. Despite a long-standing conceptual framework of the restriction point for progression through G1 phase into S phase or exit from G1 phase to quiescence (G0), recent technical advances in quantitative single cell analysis of mammalian cells have provided new insights. Significant intercellular heterogeneity revealed by single cell studies and the discovery of discrete subpopulations in proliferating cultures suggests the need for an even more nuanced understanding of cell proliferation decisions. In this review, we describe some of the recent developments in the cell cycle field made possible by quantitative single cell experimental approaches.

The role of MIF, cyclinD1 and ERK in the development of pulmonary hypertension in broilers

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a major disease in the broiler breeding industry. During PH, the pulmonary artery undergoes remodelling, which is caused by pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. CyclinD1 regulates cell proliferation. This study investigated the role of cyclinD1 in the development of PH in broilers, and which bioactivators and signalling pathway are involved in the pathological process. The PH group contained 3-4-week-old broilers with clinical PH, and the healthy group broilers from the same flock without PH. Histopathology indicated pulmonary arterial walls were thicker in the PH group compared with the healthy group. Target gene expressions of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and cyclinD1 detected by quantitative real-time PCR were upregulated in the PH group compared with the healthy group. Immunohistochemistry showed MIF, phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) and cyclinD1 were present on pulmonary vascular walls; MIF was present in the cytoplasm of arterial endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells; p-ERK and cyclinD1 were present in smooth muscle cell cytoplasm. Western blotting demonstrated that MIF, p-ERKand cyclinD1 levels were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the PH group compared with the healthy group. In summary, increased MIF in PH broiler pulmonary arteries upregulated cyclinD1 via the ERK signalling pathway to induce pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, causing pulmonary artery remodelling and hypertension.

Adenovirus-mediated co-expression of ING4 and PTEN cooperatively enhances their antitumor activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Both inhibitor of growth 4 (ING4) and phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) are well known as tumor suppressors that are closely related to tumor occurrence and progression. It was reported that ING4 and PTEN showed synergistic antitumor activities in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. The two tumor suppressors demonstrated synergistic effect on growth inhibition and apoptosis activation. In this study, we investigated their therapeutic potential in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Recombinant adenoviruses co-expressing ING4 and PTEN (Ad-ING4-PTEN) were constructed, and the antitumor effect on SMMC-7721 and HepG2 HCC cells was evaluated. Ad-ING4-PTEN cooperatively inhibited cell growth, stimulated apoptosis, and suppressed invasion in both HCC cells, and regulated cell cycle in SMMC-7721. Further studies showed that the combination of ING4 and PTEN by Ad-ING4-PTEN cooperatively enhanced the alteration of the expression of cell cycle-related proteins (p53, p21, and cyclin D1) and apoptotic factors (Bad, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bax), which are involved in the regulation of cell cycle and the activation of apoptotic pathways, leading to the synergistic antitumor effect. These results indicate that the combination of ING4 and PTEN may provide an effective therapeutic strategy for HCC.

Murine norovirus replication induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in asynchronously growing cells

Many viruses replicate most efficiently in specific phases of the cell cycle, establishing or exploiting favorable conditions for viral replication, although little is known about the relationship between caliciviruses and the cell cycle. Microarray and Western blot analysis of murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1)-infected cells showed changes in cyclin transcript and protein levels indicative of a G1 phase arrest. Cell cycle analysis confirmed that MNV-1 infection caused a prolonging of the G1 phase and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1 phase. The accumulation in G0/G1 phase was caused by a reduction in cell cycle progression through the G1/S restriction point, with MNV-1-infected cells released from a G1 arrest showing reduced cell cycle progression compared to mock-infected cells. MNV-1 replication was compared in populations of cells synchronized into specific cell cycle phases and in asynchronously growing cells. Cells actively progressing through the G1 phase had a 2-fold or higher increase in virus progeny and capsid protein expression over cells in other phases of the cell cycle or in unsynchronized populations. These findings suggest that MNV-1 infection leads to prolonging of the G1 phase and a reduction in S phase entry in host cells, establishing favorable conditions for viral protein production and viral replication. There is limited information on the interactions between noroviruses and the cell cycle, and this observation of increased replication in the G1 phase may be representative of other members of the Caliciviridae.

IMPORTANCE

Noroviruses have proven recalcitrant to growth in cell culture, limiting our understanding of the interaction between these viruses and the infected cell. In this study, we used the cell-culturable MNV-1 to show that infection of murine macrophages affects the G1/S cell cycle phase transition, leading to an arrest in cell cycle progression and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1 phase. Furthermore, we show that MNV replication is enhanced in the G1 phase compared to other stages of the cell cycle. Manipulating the cell cycle or adapting to cell cycle responses of the host cell is a mechanism to enhance virus replication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a norovirus interacting with the host cell cycle and exploiting the favorable conditions of the G0/G1 phase for RNA virus replication.

H-ras localizes to cell nuclei and varies with the cell cycle

H-Ras functions as a signal switch molecule in numerous signaling pathways in the cytoplasm, requiring H-Ras localization to the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane, and H-Ras is considered to be a cytoplasmic protein. Immunoblot studies of cells transformed by overexpression of c-H-ras indicated that H-Ras protein was present in both cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts, suggesting a possible correlation of nuclear H-Ras and cellular transformation. Unexpectedly, additional studies revealed that H-Ras protein was also present in the nuclei of nontransformed and primary mouse cells, which do not overexpress H-Ras. Mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3 cells, L cells, and a primary fibroblast line all had H-Ras present in both cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts of cells synchronized by growth without serum displayed an increasing amount of H-Ras and cyclin D1 as cells grew after serum addition. Treatment with farnesyltransferase inhibitor caused loss of H-Ras from the nucleus. Immunofluorescence in situ studies of nuclei from synchronized cultures showed that H-Ras protein appeared in and disappeared from the nuclei as the cells moved through the growth cycle. This cycling occurred in both nontransformed and ras-transformed cells. Flow cytometry measurements on parallel cultures revealed that the time point at which the greatest percentage of cells were in S phase, for each line, corresponded to appearance of a noticeably stronger in situ signal for H-Ras. H-Ras may participate in nuclear signaling pathways associated with replication in addition to its cytoplasmic signaling functions.

Cell cycle studies based upon quantitative image analysis

When cell cycle studies are performed following cell cycle synchronization, it is possible that critical properties of an actively cycling cell will be overlooked. For this reason past studies have not revealed critical aspects of cell cycle control; such as how a cell determines when to exit the cell cycle, or how rapidly it should cycle. To address these challenging questions we have developed a procedure to quantitate fluorescent stains in a monolayer culture, where nuclear fluorescence and cell cycle history can be assessed with accuracy on a cell by cell basis. The cell cycle position of each cell can be determined by analyzing DNA and BrdU levels. The behavior of cells in a given cell cycle position can then be studied by quantitating up to two other stained markers. When the microinjection of siRNA, neutralizing antibodies, and expression plasmids are coupled with quantitative image analysis, these cell cycle studies can be conducted following alterations in the expression levels of selected cellular targets. With these techniques we have discovered critical aspects of cell cycle control; including how cyclin D1 levels vary through the cell cycle, the molecular mechanisms governing these changes, and the biological implications of changes in cyclin D1 concentration in various cell cycle stages. Our studies with cyclin D1, coupled with similar studies of p27Kip1, form the basis of an entirely new model of cell cycle control proposed here. This model explains how cell cycle progression is terminated, and how the length of the cell cycle is regulated.

Redox-dependent expression of cyclin D1 and cell proliferation by Nox1 in mouse lung epithelial cells

NADPH oxidases produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that serve as co-stimulatory signals for cell proliferation. In mouse lung epithelial cells that express Nox1, Nox2, Nox4, p22(phox), p47(phox), p67(phox), and Noxo1, overexpression of Nox1 delayed cell cycle withdrawal by maintaining AP-1-dependent expression of cyclin D1 in low serum conditions. In cycling cells, the effects of Nox1 were dose dependent: levels of Nox1 that induced 3- to 10-fold increases in ROS promoted phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and expression of cyclin D1, whereas expression of Nox1 with Noxo1 and Noxa1 (or expression of Nox4 alone) that induced substantial increases in intracellular ROS inhibited cyclin D1 and proliferation. Catalase reversed the effects of Nox1 on cyclin D1 and cell proliferation. Diphenylene iodonium, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase activity, did not affect dosedependent responses of ERK1/2 or Akt to serum, but markedly inhibited the sequential expression of c-Fos and Fra-1 required for induction of cyclin D1 during cell cycle re-entry. These results indicate that Nox1 stimulates cell proliferation in actively cycling cells by reducing the requirement for growth factors to maintain expression of cyclin D1, whereas during cell cycle re-entry, NADPH oxidase activity is required for transcriptional activation of Fos family genes during the immediate early gene response.

Destabilization of cyclin D1 message plays a critical role in cell cycle exit upon mitogen withdrawal

Cyclin D1 is critical for entry into, continuation of, and exit from the cell division cycle. Mitogen stimulation of quiescent cells induces cyclin D1 expression in a transcription-dependent manner. In actively cycling cells, on the other hand, fluctuation of cyclin D1 protein levels through the cell cycle is post-transcriptionally regulated. Cyclin D1 is expressed at low levels during S phase to allow efficient DNA synthesis, and induced to high levels in G2 phase through Ras activity to commit the cells to continuing cell cycle progression. Once induced in G2 phase, cyclin D1 expression becomes Ras independent through the next G1 phase, where it promotes G1/S transition. When mitogenic signaling is abrogated, however, cyclin D1 fails to increase during G2 phase and the cell becomes arrested in the next G1 phase. In this way, the expression levels of cyclin D1 in G2 phase determine the fate of the next cell cycle. Despite its importance of the mechanism of cyclin D1 suppression upon mitogen withdrawal is unknown. Using both quantitative fluorescence microscopy and biochemical analyses, we have found that, upon serum deprivation, cyclin D1 mRNA is downmodulated without any decline in its rate of transcription. Furthermore, cyclin D1 mRNA half-life becomes shorter when serum is removed. These results demonstrate that cyclin D1 message destabilization plays a critical role in cyclin D1 suppression during G2 phase of serum-deprived cultures, and therefore in the withdrawal from the cell cycle.

p53 can inhibit cell proliferation through caspase-mediated cleavage of ERK2/MAPK

Stimulation of the Ras/MAPK cascade can either activate p53 and promote replicative senescence and apoptosis, or degrade p53 and promote cell survival. Here we show that p53 can directly counteract the Ras/MAPK signaling by inactivating ERK2/MAPK. This inactivation is due to a caspase cleavage of the ERK2 protein and contributes to p53-mediated growth arrest. We found that in Ras-transformed cells, growth arrest induced by p53, but not p21(Waf1), is associated with a strong reduction in ERK2 activity, phosphorylation, and protein half-life, and with the appearance of caspase activity. Likewise, DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest correlates with p53-dependent ERK2 downregulation and caspase activation. Furthermore, caspase inhibitors or expression of a caspase-resistant ERK2 mutant interfere with ERK2 cleavage and restore proliferation in the presence of p53 activation, indicating that caspase-mediated ERK2 degradation contributes to p53-induced growth arrest. These findings strongly point to ERK2 as a novel p53 target in growth suppression.

P27 expression is regulated by separate signaling pathways, downstream of Ras, in each cell cycle phase

The cyclin inhibitory protein p27Kip1 (p27) plays a vital role in regulating cell proliferation in response to the extracellular growth environment. Active proliferation requires the suppression of p27 levels throughout the cell cycle. Late in the cell cycle, p27 degradation requires phosphorylation of Thr 187 by cyclin dependent kinase 2, leading to recognition by the SCF ubiquitin ligase containing the Skp2 F-box protein. Suppression of p27 is also essential for cell proliferation early in the cell cycle, but this occurs independently of Skp2, whose expression is suppressed during G1 phase. In this study, we use a time lapse and quantitative imaging approach to study the connection between proliferative signaling and the degradation of p27 during each cell cycle period in actively cycling cells. Ras activity was required for the suppression of p27 levels throughout the cell cycle, but separate pathways downstream of Ras signaling were required in different cell cycle periods. For example, inhibitors of MEK and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase induced p27 expression primarily in G1 phase, while inhibitors of AKT activity stimulated these levels primarily in S phase. Skp2 was expressed in a Ras-dependent manner at higher levels late in the cell cycle. Its ablation resulted in higher p27 levels primarily in G2 phase as expected. The fact that separate signaling pathways downstream of Ras function in each cell cycle phase to suppress p27 levels helps explain the vital connection between proliferative signaling, cell cycle control, and p27 expression.

Control of proliferation by Bcl-2 family members

The anti-proliferative effect of Bcl-2 acts mainly at the level of the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Deletions and point mutations in the bcl-2 gene show that the anti-proliferative activity of Bcl-2, can in some cases, be dissociated from its anti-apoptotic function. This indicates that the effect of Bcl-2 on cell cycle progression can be a direct effect and not only a consequence of its anti-apoptotic activity. Bcl-2 appears to mediate its anti-proliferative effect by acting on both signal transduction pathways (NFAT, ERK) and on specific cell cycle regulators (p27, p130).

Cyclin D1 serves as a cell cycle regulatory switch in actively proliferating cells

Much of our current understanding of the cell cycle involves analyses of its induction in quiescent cells. To better understand the control of cell cycle propagation and termination, studies have been performed in actively cycling cultures using time-lapse photography and quantitative image analysis. These studies reveal a highly ordered sequence of events required for promotion of continued proliferation. The decision to continue cell cycle progression takes place in G2 phase, when cellular Ras induces the elevation of cyclin D1 levels. These levels are maintained through G1 phase and are required for the initiation of S phase, at which time cyclin D1 levels are automatically reduced to low levels. The reduction of cyclin D1 to low levels during S phase is required for DNA synthesis, and forces the cell to induce high cyclin D1 levels once again when it enters G2 phase. In this way, cyclin D1 is proposed to serve as an active switch in the regulation of continued cell cycle progression.

Loss of Rb overrides the requirement for ERK activity for cell proliferation

The Ras GTPase is a critical transducer of mitogenic signals ultimately leading to inactivation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, but the molecular basis underlying Ras-dependent control of cell cycle kinetics remains to a great extent unknown. In an effort to further elucidate the role of Ras activation in cell cycle control, we have studied the role of the downstream Mek-ERK pathway in facilitating exit from the quiescent G0 state and passage through the G1/S transition. We have adopted a genetic approach in combination with U0126, an inhibitor of Mek activation to study the role of Mek in cell cycle progression. Here we report that whereas wild-type (Wt) mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) depend on ERK activation to enter the cell cycle, Rb-deficient (Rb(-/-)) MEFs have a reduced requirement for ERK signalling. Indeed in the presence of U0126 we found that Rb-null MEFs can exit G0, make the G1/S transition and proliferate. Analysis of Rb-deficient tumour cell lines also revealed a reduced requirement for ERK signalling in asynchronous growth. We discuss the molecular mechanism that may underlie this escape from MAP kinase signalling.

Oncogenic H-ras induces cyclin B1 expression in a p53-independent manner

The role of p53 in controlling the G2 checkpoint, in part by repressing cyclin B1 transcription, has been well established. However, accumulating evidence indicate that p53-independent pathways may also play an important role. Ras proteins have been shown to regulate G1/S, but also G2/M transitions. Since cyclin B1/cdc2 complex is the key regulator controlling the G2/M checkpoint, we were interested in addressing if the H-ras oncogene could regulate cyclin B1 expression in a p53-independent manner. We observed an induction of cyclin B1 promoter activity in the presence of H-ras oncogene in SW480 cells, which contain null p53 alleles. In addition, HeLa cells known to express the HPV18 E6 oncogene that inactivates p53, exhibited increased levels of cyclin B1 mRNA and protein when transfected with the H-ras oncogene. Higher expression of cyclin B1 correlated with higher levels of cyclin B1/cdc2 complex and kinase activity that interestingly, showed no inhibition at G2/M after DNA damage. These data suggest that H-ras participates in pathways that regulate cyclin B1 expression and therefore controls the G2/M checkpoint in a p53-independent manner.

Post-transcriptional regulation of cyclin D1 expression during G2 phase

During continuous proliferation, cyclin D1 protein is induced to high levels in a Ras-dependent manner as cells progress from S phase to G2 phase. To understand the mechanism of the Ras-dependent cyclin D1 induction, cyclin D1 mRNA levels were determined by quantitative image analysis following fluorescent in situ hybridization. Although a slight increase in mRNA expression levels was detected during the S/G2 transition, this increase could not explain the more robust induction of cyclin D1 protein levels. This suggested the involvement of post-transcriptional regulation as a mechanism of cyclin D1 protein induction. To directly test this hypothesis, the cyclin D1 transcription rate was determined by run-on assays. The transcription rate of cyclin D1 stayed steady during the synchronous transition from S the G2 phase. We further demonstrated that cyclin D1 protein levels could increase during G2 phase in the absence of new mRNA synthesis. alpha-Amanitin, a transcription inhibitor, did not suppress cyclin D1 protein elevation as the cells progressed from S to G2 phase, even though the inhibitor was able to completely block cyclin D1 protein induction during reentry into the cell cycle from quiescence. The half life of cyclin D1 protein was shortest during S phase indicating that a change in protein stability might play a role in post-translational induction of cyclin D1 in G2 phase. These data indicate a fundamental difference in the regulation of cyclin D1 production during continuous cell cycle progression and re-initiation of the cell cycle.

Ras family genes: an interesting link between cell cycle and cancer

Ras genes are evolutionary conserved and codify for a monomeric G protein binding GTP (active form) or GDP (inactive form). The ras genes are ubiquitously expressed although mRNA analysis suggests different level expression in tissue. Mutations in each ras gene frequently were found in different tumors, suggesting their involvement in the development of specific neoplasia. These mutations lead to a constitutive active and potentially oncogenic protein that could cause a deregulation of cell cycle. Ras protein moderates cellular responses at several mitogens and/or differentiation factors and at external stimuli. These stimuli activate a series of signal transduction pathways that either can be independent or interconnected at different points. Recent observations begin to clarify the complex relationship between Ras activation, apoptosis, and cellular proliferation. A greater understanding of these processes would help to identify the factors directly responsible for cell cycle deregulation in several tumors, moreover it would help the design of specific therapeutic strategies, for the control on the proliferation of neoplastic cells. We summarize here current knowledge of ras genes family: structural and functional characteristics of Ras proteins and their links with cell cycle and cancer.

Gene expression profiling of HeLa cells in G1 or G2 phases

The cell division cycle is regulated through both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. The altered expression of a number of genes at the mRNA level is known to be essential for progression through the cell cycle, however, a comprehensive gene expression profile of human cells remains to be completed. Here we sought to monitor the differential gene expression of genes after the transition of G2 cells into G1 prior to the restriction point. GeneChip containing microarrays of oligonucleotides corresponding to over 12 000 human genes were employed to profile differential gene expression in G1 and G2. After three independent experiments the resultant data was filtered and a set of genes was compiled based on at least threefold-altered expression, no background noise in determining expression and observation in all experiments. Our analysis identified 154 genes that were elevated in G2 phase of cells as compared to early G1 phase including 15 novel genes. This number included mRNAs whose upregulation is known to occur in G2 phase. Surprisingly only 19 genes were upregulated in G1 phase, among these six genes were novel. Some of these genes are candidates for transition through early G1. This gene inventory for G1 and G2 phases of cell cycle will provide the basis for understanding of cell cycle delay as a result of DNA damage.

Ras and Rho regulation of the cell cycle and oncogenesis

The important contribution of aberrant Ras activation in oncogenesis is well established. Our knowledge of the signaling pathways that are regulated by Ras is considerable. However, the number of downstream effectors of Ras continues to increase and our understanding of the role of these effector signaling pathways in mediating oncogenesis is far from complete and continues to evolve. Similarly, our understanding of the components that control mitogen-stimulated cell cycle progression is also very advanced. Where our understanding has lagged has been the delineation of the mechanism by which Ras causes a deregulation of cell cycle progression to promote the uncontrolled proliferation of the cancer cell. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of how deregulated Ras activation alters the function of cyclin D1, p21(Cip1), and p27(Kip1). The two themes that we have emphasized are the involvement of Rho small GTPases in cell cycle regulation and the cell-type differences in how Ras signaling interfaces with the cell cycle machinery.