1
|
The RNA-binding protein Cpeb4 regulates splicing of the Id2 gene in osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2024; 239:e31197. [PMID: 38284484 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.31197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 4 (Cpeb4) is an RNA-binding protein that regulates posttranscriptional regulation, such as regulation of messenger RNA stability and translation. In the previous study, we reported that Cpeb4 localizes to nuclear bodies upon induction of osteoclast differentiation by RANKL. However, the mechanisms of the localization of Cpeb4 and osteoclastogenesis by Cpeb4 remain unknown. Here, we show that Cpeb4 localizes to the nuclear bodies by its RNA-binding ability and partially regulates normal splicing during osteoclast differentiation. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis with Phos-tag® revealed that the phosphorylation levels of Cpeb4 were already high in the RAW264.7 cells and were not altered by RANKL treatment. Immunofluorescence showed that exogenous Cpeb4 in HEK293T cells without RANKL stimulation localized to the same foci as shown in RANKL-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Furthermore, when nuclear export was inhibited by leptomycin B treatment, Cpeb4 accumulated throughout the nucleus. Importantly, RNA recognition motif (RRM) 7 of Cpeb4 was essential for the localization. In contrast, the intrinsically disordered region, RRM1, and zinc finger domain CEBP_ZZ were not necessary for the localization. The mechanistic study showed that Cpeb4 co-localized and interacted with the splicing factors serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 5 (SRSF5) and SRSF6, suggesting that Cpeb4 may be involved in the splicing reaction. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that the expression of genes related to cell proliferation processes, such as mitotic cell cycle and regulation of cell cycle processes, was elevated in osteoclasts depleted of Cpeb4. Interestingly, the splicing pattern of the inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2) gene, which suppresses osteoclast differentiation, was altered by the depletion of Cpeb4. These results provide new insight into the role of Cpeb4 as a player of normal splicing of Id2 in osteoclast differentiation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Similarities Between Embryo Development and Cancer Process Suggest New Strategies for Research and Therapy of Tumors: A New Point of View. Front Cell Dev Biol 2019; 7:20. [PMID: 30899759 PMCID: PMC6416183 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, I propose that cancer stem cells (CSCs) would be equivalent to para-embryonic stem cells (p-ESCs), derived from adult cells de-re-programmed to a ground state. p-ESCs would differ from ESCs by the absence of genomic homeostasis. A p-ESC would constitute the cancer cell of origin (i-CSC or CSC0), capable of generating an initial tumor, corresponding to a pre-implantation blastocyst. In a niche with proper signals, it would engraft as a primary tumor, corresponding to a post-implantation blastocyst. i-CSC progeny would form primary pluripotent and slow self-renewing CSCs (CSC1s), blocked in an undifferentiated state, corresponding to epiblast cells; CSC1s would be tumor-initiating cells (TICs). CSC1s would generate secondary CSCs (CSC2s), corresponding to hypoblast cells; CSC2s would be tumor growth cells (TGCs). CSC1s/CSC2s would generate tertiary CSCs (CSC3s), with a mesenchymal phenotype; CSC3s would be tumor migrating cells (TMCs), corresponding to mesodermal precursors at primitive streak. CSC3s with more favorable conditions (normoxia), by asymmetrical division, would differentiate into cancer progenitor cells (CPCs), and these into cancer differentiated cells (CDCs), thus generating a defined cell hierarchy and tumor progression, mimicking somito-histo-organogenesis. CSC3s with less favorable conditions (hypoxia) would delaminate and migrate as quiescent circulating micro-metastases, mimicking mesenchymal cells in gastrula morphogenetic movements. In metastatic niches, these CSC3s would install and remain dormant in the presence of epithelial/mesenchymal transition (EMT) signals and hypoxia. But, in the presence of mesenchymal/epithelial transition (MET) signals and normoxia, they would revert to self-renewing CSC1s, reproducing the same cell hierarchy of the primary tumor as macro-metastases. Further similarities between ontogenesis and oncogenesis involving crucial factors, such as ID, HSP70, HLA-G, CD44, LIF, and STAT3, are strongly evident at molecular, physiological and immunological levels. Much experimental data about these factors led to considering the cancer process as ectopic rudimentary ontogenesis, where CSCs have privileged immunological conditions. These would consent to CSC development in an adverse environment, just like an embryo, which is tolerated, accepted and favored by the maternal organism in spite of its paternal semi-allogeneicity. From all these considerations, novel research directions, potential innovative tumor therapy and prophylaxis strategies might, theoretically, result.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Inhibitors of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are members of the large family of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors, but they lack any DNA-binding motif. During development, the Id proteins play a key role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell differentiation by modulating different cell-cycle regulators both by direct and indirect mechanisms. Several Id-protein interacting partners have been identified thus far, which belong to structurally and functionally unrelated families, including, among others, the class I and II bHLH transcription factors, the retinoblastoma protein and related pocket proteins, the paired-box transcription factors, and the S5a subunit of the 26 S proteasome. Although the HLH domain of the Id proteins is involved in most of their protein-protein interaction events, additional motifs located in their N-terminal and C-terminal regions are required for the recognition of diverse protein partners. The ability of the Id proteins to interact with structurally different proteins is likely to arise from their conformational flexibility: indeed, these proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions that, in the case of the HLH region, undergo folding upon self- or heteroassociation. Besides their crucial role for cell-fate determination and cell-cycle progression during development, other important cellular events have been related to the Id-protein expression in a number of pathologies. Dysregulated Id-protein expression has been associated with tumor growth, vascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, chemoresistance and stemness, as well as with various developmental defects and diseases. Herein we provide an overview on the structural properties, mode of action, biological function and therapeutic potential of these regulatory proteins.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Id-protein family in developmental and cancer-associated pathways. Cell Commun Signal 2017; 15:7. [PMID: 28122577 PMCID: PMC5267474 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-016-0161-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhibitors of DNA binding and cell differentiation (Id) proteins are members of the large family of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors, but they lack any DNA-binding motif. During development, the Id proteins play a key role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression and cell differentiation by modulating different cell-cycle regulators both by direct and indirect mechanisms. Several Id-protein interacting partners have been identified thus far, which belong to structurally and functionally unrelated families, including, among others, the class I and II bHLH transcription factors, the retinoblastoma protein and related pocket proteins, the paired-box transcription factors, and the S5a subunit of the 26 S proteasome. Although the HLH domain of the Id proteins is involved in most of their protein-protein interaction events, additional motifs located in their N-terminal and C-terminal regions are required for the recognition of diverse protein partners. The ability of the Id proteins to interact with structurally different proteins is likely to arise from their conformational flexibility: indeed, these proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions that, in the case of the HLH region, undergo folding upon self- or heteroassociation. Besides their crucial role for cell-fate determination and cell-cycle progression during development, other important cellular events have been related to the Id-protein expression in a number of pathologies. Dysregulated Id-protein expression has been associated with tumor growth, vascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, chemoresistance and stemness, as well as with various developmental defects and diseases. Herein we provide an overview on the structural properties, mode of action, biological function and therapeutic potential of these regulatory proteins.
Collapse
|
5
|
The inhibitor of differentiation isoform Id1b, generated by alternative splicing, maintains cell quiescence and confers self-renewal and cancer stem cell-like properties. Cancer Lett 2014; 356:899-909. [PMID: 25449776 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Revised: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Id1 has been shown to play a critical role in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Moreover, recent reports have involved Id1 in the maintenance of cancer stem cell features in some tumor types. The Id1 gene generates two isoforms through alternative splicing: Id1a and Id1b. We have investigated the role of each isoform in cancer development. Using lentiviral systems we modified the endogenous expression of each of these isoforms in cancer cells and analyzed their biological effect both in vitro and in vivo. Overexpression of Id1b in murine CT26 and 3LL cells caused a G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and reduced proliferation, clonogenicity and phospho-ERK1/2 levels, while increasing p27 levels. High levels of Id1a had an opposite effect and the proportion of cells in the S phase increased significantly. In vivo models confirmed the inhibitory role of Id1b in primary tumor growth and metastasis. Through microarray analysis we found that the cancer stem cell (CSC) markers ALDH1A1 and Notch-1 were up-regulated specifically in Id1b-overexpressing cells. By using qPCR we also found overexpression of Sca-1, Tert, Sox-2 and Oct-4 in these cells. Increased levels of Id1b promoted self-renewal and CSC-like properties, as shown by their high capacity for developing secondary tumorspheres and retaining the PKH26 dye. The acquisition of CSC phenotype was confirmed in human PC-3 cells that overexpressed Id1b. Our results show that Id1b maintains cells in a quiescent state and promotes self-renewal and CSC-like features. On the contrary, Id1a promotes cell proliferation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Self-recognition behavior of a helix-loop-helix domain by a fragment scan. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS 2014; 1844:1675-83. [PMID: 24981796 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2014] [Revised: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The inhibitors of DNA binding Id1-4 are helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins that exert their biological function by interacting with members of the basic-HLH (bHLH) transcription-factor family. The HLH domains of the Id and bHLH proteins allow both self- and hetero-association. Due to their abnormal expression in cancer cells, the Id proteins are potential protein targets for cancer treatment. Suitable Id-protein inactivators should promote self-association and/or prevent hetero-association. In this work we evaluated the ability of the Id-protein HLH domain to recognize itself in form of short sequences extracted from the helical and loop regions. We performed a peptide scan of the Id1 HLH domain 64-106 based on three-residue overlapping octapeptides. Interaction of each octapeptide with the natively folded Id1 HLH domain was investigated by CD and fluorescence spectroscopy. The results from both techniques showed that the helix-based but not the loop-based octapeptides interacted with the Id1 HLH domain in the low-micromolar range. In contrast, a nitrotyrosine-containing analog of the Id1 HLH region, which was unable to reproduce the native-like conformation, quenched only the 2-amino-benzoyl-(Abz)-labeled loop-based octapeptides. This opposite self-recognition pattern suggests that the short helix-based and loop-based sequences should be able to distinguish different folding states of the Id1 HLH domain. This feature may be biologically relevant, as the Id proteins are predicted to behave as intrinsically disordered proteins, being in equilibrium between rapidly exchanging monomeric conformations and structurally better-defined homo-/heterodimers displaying the parallel four-helix bundle.
Collapse
|
7
|
ID1, inhibitor of differentiation/DNA binding, is an effector of the p53-dependent DNA damage response pathway. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:22410-6. [PMID: 18556654 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m800643200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
ID1, inhibitor of differentiation/DNA binding, plays an important role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis. It has been shown that ID1 is de-regulated in multiple cancers and up-regulation of ID1 is correlated with high grades and poor prognosis of human cancers. In contrast, the p53 tumor suppressor was found to be mutated or inactivated in most human cancers and loss of p53 results in early onset of multiple cancers. Although the biological functions of the ID1 oncogene and the p53 tumor suppressor have been intensively investigated, little is known about the upstream regulators of ID1 and the cross-talk between ID1 and p53. Here, we showed that ID1 is down-regulated in cells treated with various DNA damage agents in a p53-dependent manner. Interestingly, we found that DEC1, which was recently identified as a p53 target and mediates p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and senescence, is capable of inhibiting ID1 expression. Conversely, we found that knockdown of DEC1 attenuates DNA damage-induced ID1 repression. In addition, we identified several potential DEC1 responsive elements in the proximal promoter region of the ID1 gene. Moreover, we showed that overexpression of ID1 or ID1', an isoform of ID1, promotes cell proliferation potentially through inhibition of p21 expression. Finally, we found that the extent of DNA damage-induced premature senescence was substantially decreased by overexpression of ID1 or ID1'. Taken together, our study suggests that p53 trans-repressional activity can be mediated by its own target DEC1 and ID1 is an effector of the p53-dependent DNA damage response pathway.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Id1, an inhibitory partner of basic-helix-loop-helix transcriptional factors, has recently been recognized as a potent contributor to angiogenesis. However, the molecular mechanism underlying its role in angiogenesis remains essentially unknown. Herein we demonstrate the subcellular localization of Id1 to be altered depending on the cellular context of vascular endothelial cells. Id1 was localized in the nuclei of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured on uncoated plates, whereas it was translocated to the cytoplasm in HUVECs on Matrigel along with the formation of capillary-like structures. Treatment with the nuclear export inhibitor leptomycin B and mutagenesis analysis using green fluorescent protein-fused Id1 revealed CRM1/exportin-dependent nuclear export of Id1 in HUVECs on Matrigel. This nuclear export of Id1 was inhibited by protein kinase A (PKA) activation by dibutyryl cyclic AMP and forskolin but was promoted by PKA inactivation by H-89 and MDL-12,330A. Mutagenesis analysis of Id1 showed the phosphorylation of Ser-5 to possibly mediate the effect of PKA. These results suggest the function of Id1 as a transcriptional factor to be controlled by nucleocytoplasmic shuttling during angiogenesis and that PKA might be involved in this process. This may serve as a novel mechanism regulating angiogenesis and as a possible target for therapeutic vascular regeneration.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase (CASK) is generally known as a scaffold protein. Here we show that overexpression of CASK resulted in a reduced rate of cell growth, while inhibition of expression of endogenous CASK via RNA-mediated interference resulted in an increased rate of cell growth in ECV304 cells. To explore the molecular mechanism, we identified a novel CASK-interacting protein, inhibitor of differentiation 1 (Id1) with a yeast two-hybrid screening. Furthermore, endogenous CASK and Id1 proteins were co-precipitated from the lysates of ECV304 cells by immunoprecipitation. Mammalian two-hybrid protein-protein interaction assays indicated that CASK possessed a different binding activity for Id1 and its alternative splicing variant. It is known that Id proteins play important roles in regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. Thus, we speculate that the regulation of cell growth mediated by CASK may be involved in Id1. Our findings indicate a novel function of CASK, the mechanism that remains to be further investigated.
Collapse
|
10
|
Different effects of BMP-2 on marrow stromal cells from human and rat bone. Cells Tissues Organs 2004; 176:109-19. [PMID: 14745240 PMCID: PMC1463182 DOI: 10.1159/000075032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) promote the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells, and also induce osteogenesis in bone marrow stromal cells (MSC) from rats and mice. However, compared to results with animal models, BMPs are relatively inefficient in inducing human MSC to undergo osteogenesis, and are much less effective in promoting bone formation in human clinical trials. Previous studies indicated that, while human MSC respond to dexamethasone with elevated levels of the osteoblast marker alkaline phosphatase, most isolates of human MSC fail to show alkaline phosphatase induction in response to BMP-2, BMP-4, or BMP-7. Several other genes known to be induced by BMPs are appropriately regulated; thus, human MSC are capable of some BMP-activated signaling. Analysis of the BMP receptors ALK-3 and ALK-6 indicated that, although ALK-6 mRNA was not expressed in human MSC, overexpressing a constitutively active ALK-6 receptor did not induce elevated alkaline phosphatase. Real-time RT-PCR was used to investigate expression of several osteoblast-related transcription factors in MSC after 6 days' exposure to BMP2 or dexamethasone. Msx-2, a transcription factor that has been reported to inhibit differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells, showed 10-fold elevation in BMP-2-treated human MSC, but not in BMP-2-treated rat MSC. Overexpression of Msx-2 in human and rat MSC, however, did not alter alkaline phosphatase levels, which suggests that absence of BMP-stimulated alkaline phosphatase was not caused by the BMP-2-induced increase in Msx-2. Although Runx2 isoforms have been implicated in control of osteoblast differentiation, levels of this transcription factor were unaffected by BMP treatment. Expression of the FKHR transcription factor, which has been reported to regulate alkaline phosphatase transcription in mouse cells, showed a modest increase in response to BMP-2, but a much greater increase in dexamethasone-treated cells. We propose that BMP regulation of the bone/liver/kidney alkaline phosphatase gene is indirect, requiring expression of new transcription factor(s) that behave differently in rodent and human MSC.
Collapse
|
11
|
Identification of a rare polymorphism in the human TP53 promoter. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 2002; 135:165-72. [PMID: 12127401 DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The majority of families with classic Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) and a significant proportion of Li-Fraumeni-like (LFL) families have a germline mutation in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. However around 20% of LFS and 60% of LFL families have no identifiable genetic defect in the coding region or splice junctions of TP53, and the genetic basis for cancer susceptibility in these families remains largely uncharacterized. To determine whether promoter mutations could be responsible for the Li-Fraumeni phenotype, we sequenced the TP53 promoter in index cases from members of classic LFS and LFL families without detectable TP53 mutations. We identified an identical single nucleotide deletion within the C/EBP- like site of the promoter in two out of eighteen such families (11%), compared to only one of a total of 366 control samples (0.3%). Although this result is highly significant (P=0.006, Fischer's exact test), the mutation did not affect the expression of TP53 in our hands. We provide evidence that this site is not utilized in the wild type TP53 promoter and further, that mutation of this site in LFS/LFL does not have a functional effect. We conclude that the sequence variant is a rare polymorphism arising within the TP53 promoter. However, the significantly increased frequency of this variant in LFS/LFL remains intriguing.
Collapse
|
12
|
cDNA array analysis of pineal gene expression reveals circadian rhythmicity of the dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein-encoding gene, Id-1. J Neuroendocrinol 2002; 14:101-8. [PMID: 11849369 DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1331.2001.00738.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The pineal gland is a major output of the endogenous vertebrate circadian clock, with melatonin serving as the output signal. In many species, elevated nocturnal melatonin production is associated with changes in pineal gene expression. In the current study, cDNA array analysis was used in an attempt to identify additional genes that exhibit day/night differential expression in the rat pineal gland. This revealed 38 candidate genes, including Id-1 (inhibitor of DNA binding and differentiation). Id-1 encodes a helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein that lacks a basic DNA binding domain and could affect pineal physiology via a dominant negative trans-acting regulatory activity. For this reason Id-1 was selected for further analysis. Id-1 was expressed in a major population of pineal cells and the Id-1 protein was associated with a nuclear complex. The levels of Id-1 mRNA and protein exhibit approximately six-fold day/night rhythms. In contrast, the related genes Id-2 and Id-3 do not exhibit marked day/night differences in pineal expression. Rhythmic Id-1 expression is primarily limited to a C-terminally extended splice variant of Id-1, which would restrict the functional output of the rhythm to protein binding partners of this isoform of Id-1. Our findings add to the body of evidence indicating that transcriptional regulators play a role in neuroendocrine rhythms, and extend this by introducing the concept of a dominant negative HLH involvement. The rhythm in Id-1 in the pineal gland provides an experimental opportunity to identify Id-1-binding partners which may also be involved in Id-1 activity in other functional contexts.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Overexpression of the helix-loop-helix motif-containing transcription inhibitor Id3 has been shown to repress muscle-specific gene expression. Consistent with its putative negative regulatory role in the myogenic process, Id3 is highly expressed in proliferating myoblasts but down regulated when myoblasts are induced to differentiate. To investigate how Id3 expression may be transcriptionally regulated, we isolated a mouse Id3 genomic DNA fragment and characterized its organization and promoter activity. Comparison of the Id3 gene from human and mouse demonstrated a conserved exon-intron organization in which the first intron interrupts the C-terminal protein coding region and the second intron interrupts the 3' untranslated region at analogous positions in the two species. Sequence analysis of the 5'-flanking region revealed an unexpected mouse strain-specific genetic polymorphism due to a single base substitution. Deletion analysis revealed that as little as 180 base pairs of the mouse Id3 promoter upstream of the transcription start site is sufficient for a high level of gene expression in proliferating C2C12 myoblasts. In particular, the region between the nucleotide position -180 and -34 appeared to be crucial for maximal reporter gene activity and interacted specifically with C2C12 nuclear proteins. Finally, we showed that, despite the creation of a putative transcription factor-binding site, the genetic polymorphism observed did not affect Id3 promoter activity in proliferating C2C12 cells.
Collapse
|