Role of periovulatory luteinizing hormone concentrations during assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated exclusively with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

Effect of letrozole cotreatment in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on IVF/ICSI outcomes in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

For poor ovarian response patients, obtaining higher number of transferable and high-quality embryos is crucial and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol is becoming widespread and constantly improving in this population. Letrozole has shown promise in numerous protocols and individuals. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the early addition of letrozole in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol among expected poor ovarian response patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection with their first progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Totally 557 patients were enrolled in this research with 189 ovarian stimulation cycles for POSEIDON group 3 patients and 368 ovarian stimulation cycles for POSEIDON group 4 patients. The primary outcome of this study was the cumulative live birth rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate, and the second outcomes included the laboratory outcomes and pregnancy outcomes, maternal and neonatal complications also were encompassed.

RESULTS

In this study, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol combined with letrozole (study group) was associated with a significantly higher number of oocytes for retrieval and maturation [3.0 (2.0, 5.0) vs. 2.0 (1.3, 4.0), P < 0.001; 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 3.8), P < 0.001] as well as 2PN embryos [2.0 (1.0, 3.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 3.0), P = 0.026] among POSEIDON group 4 patients. In POSEIDON group 3 patients, the letrozole cotreatment did not show an advantage in these indicators. There was no significant difference in both cumulative live birth rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate between the study and control group in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients. Multivariate logistic regression model showed that significant favorable effects of the number of available embryos on cumulative live birth rate in all included patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that advanced-aged poor ovarian response patients may benefit more from using letrozole as an advantageous adjuvant agent in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol to obtain more oocytes and embryos in clinical practice. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered.

Effect of LH level on HCG trigger day on clinical outcomes in patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger day (LHHCG) affect the clinical outcomes of patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol?

METHODS

Retrospective analysis fresh embryo transfer cycles of DOR patients who underwent GnRH-ant protocol from August 2019 to June 2023. The participants were divided into different groups according to LHHCG level and age. The clinical data and outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In patients with DOR, the HCG positive rate (59.3% versus 39.8%, P = 0.005), embryo implantation rate (34.5% versus 19.7%, P = 0.002), clinical pregnancy rate (49.2% versus 28.4%, P = 0.003), live birth rate (41.5% versus 22.7%, P = 0.005) in LHHCG < 2.58 IU/L group were significantly higher than LHHCG ≥ 2.58 IU/L group. There was no significant correlation between LHHCG level and clinical pregnancy in POSEIDON group 3. In POSEIDON group 4, the HCG positive rate (52.8% versus 27.0%, P = 0.015), embryo implantation rate (29.2% versus 13.3%, P = 0.023), clinical pregnancy rate (45.3% versus 18.9%, P = 0.010) in LHHCG < 3.14 IU/L group were significantly higher than LHHCG ≥ 3.14 IU/L group. Logistic regression analysis indicated that LHHCG level was an independent influencing factor for clinical pregnancy in POSEIDON group 4 patients (OR = 3.831, 95% CI: 1.379-10.643, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LHHCG level is an independent factor affecting pregnancy outcome of fresh embryo transfer in DOR patients undergoing GnRH-ant protocol, especially for advanced-aged women. LHHCG had a high predictive value for POSEIDON group 4 patients, and LHHCG ≥ 3.14 IU/L predicts poor pregnancy outcomes.

The effects of flexible short protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on preventing premature ovulation in poor responders

PURPOSE

The proportion of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) is increasing, but effective treatment remains a challenge. To control the hidden peaks of luteinizing hormone (LH) and premature ovulation for poor responders, this study investigated the efficacy of flexible short protocol (FSP) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) on trigger day.

METHODS

The 662 cycles of POR patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention group (group A) with 169 cycles received a GnRH-ant given on trigger day. The control (group B) with 493 cycles received only FSP. The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with group B, with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) on trigger day in group A the incidences of spontaneous premature ovulation decreased significantly (2.37% vs. 8.72%, P < 0.05). The number of fresh embryo-transfer cycles was 45 in group A and 117 in group B. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and the cumulative live birth rate (12.0% vs. 9.34%; 22.22% vs. 21.93%; 17.78% vs. 14.91%; 20.51% vs. 20%, respectively; P > 0.05) between the two group.

CONCLUSION

FSP with GnRH-ant addition on trigger day had no effect on clinical outcomes, but could effectively inhibit the hidden peaks of luteinizing hormone (LH) and spontaneous premature ovulation in POR. Therefore, it is an advantageous option for POR women.

Association between serum LH levels on hCG trigger day and live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations

Objective

To investigate whether serum LH levels on hCG trigger day are associated with live birth rate (LBR) after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations.

Methods

This study was a retrospective study. A total of 3059 fresh embryo transfers were divided into three populations: predicted normal ovarian responders (NOR) (n=2049), patients with PCOS (n=533), and predicted poor ovarian responders (POR) (n=477). Each population was stratified into three groups based on LH levels: < 25th percentile, 25-75th percentile, and > 75th percentile. The primary outcome of the study was LBR, and secondary outcomes included implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

In NOR, compared to the reference group (>75th percentile), LBR was significantly lower in the < 25th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.662; 95%CI, 0.508-0.863) and 25-75th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.791; 95%CI, 0.633-0.988). In PCOS patients, LBR decreased significantly in the < 25th percentile group (41.4%) compared to the 25-75th percentile group (53.7%) and > 75th percentile group (56.1%). In addition, the LBR was lower in the < 25th percentile group (33.6%) compared with the 25-75th percentile group (43.4%) and the>75th percentile group (42.0%) in POR, but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

High serum LH levels are associated with increased LBR after fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles, which may be attributable to higher implantation rate. LH may be a predictor of whether to schedule fresh embryo transfer in IVF cycles for better clinical outcomes.

LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS

A stepwise, progressive multivariate regression model was introduced to assess the effect of the LHOTD on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Mantel‒Haenszel stratification analysis was used to examine the association between the LHOTD and clinical outcomes with the antagonist regimen.

RESULTS

The LHOTD had different distributions in the agonist and antagonist regimens. The cycles were assigned into three LHOTD tertile groups. In the agonist regimen, compared with the 1^st tertile (T1), in the 2^nd (T2) and 3^rd (T3) tertiles, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs], P value) were 1.187 (1.047-1.345, 0.007) and 1.420 (1.252-1.610, < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.149 (1.009-1.309, 0.036) and 1.476 (1.296-1.681, < 0.001) for live birth. In the antagonist regimen, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the tertiles. However, in the stratified group of patients aged less than 35 years, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of T2 and T3 were 1.316 (1.051-1.648, 0.017) and 1.354 (1.077-1.703, 0.009) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.275 (1.008-1.611, 0.043) and1.269 (0.999-1.611, 0.051) for live birth. Moreover, there was a discrepancy in the results among the subdivided LHOTD T1 groups adopting the antagonist regimen. Compared with that of the < 1.06 mIU/mL subgroup, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of the > 1.5 mIU/mL subgroup were 1.693 (1.194-2.400, 0.003) for clinical pregnancy and 1.532 (1.057-2.220, 0.024) for live birth after eliminating potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

The LHOTD was profoundly suppressed in the agonist regimen, and its level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In contrast, in the flexible antagonist regimen, the LHOTD was significantly higher than that in the agonist regimen and did not correlate with the outcome, except for women in the nonadvanced age group and those with an excessively suppressed LHOTD. Further investigation is required to determine the rationale for these findings.

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) versus PPOS protocol used alone on cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes for women with the poor ovarian response (POR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study and a total of 578 POR patients who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles were collected and divided into Group A (HMG 300 IU/d + MPA 10 mg/d) and Group B (HMG 300 IU/d + MPA 10 mg/d + CC 50 mg/d). The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved, other outcome measures were cycle characteristics and clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The baseline information between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared with Group A, Group B had a lower total dose of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) (2998.63 ± 1051.09 vs. 3399.18 ± 820.75, P < 0.001) and the duration of stimulation (10.21 ± 3.56 vs. 11.27 ± 2.56, P < 0.001). Serum luteinizing hormone level was higher in Group B on human chorionic gonadotrophin injection day (P < 0.001). The number of oocyte for retrieval, maturation, and fertilization were significantly lower in Group B than that in Group A (P < 0.001). However, the oocyte retrieval rate, maturation rate, fertilization rate, and viable embryo rate showed no statistical difference in the two groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.286; 95% CI 0.671-2.470) and live birth rate (OR 1.390; 95% CI 0.478-3.990) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PPOS protocol combined with CC reduces the total dose of HMG and the duration of stimulation, and can also achieve similar oocyte yields and clinical pregnancy rate compared with the PPOS protocol used alone in poor ovarian responders.

Low Endogenous LH on the COS Initiation Day of a GnRH-Agonist Regimen Increases the Risk of Early Pregnancy Loss and Adverse ART Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on the day of initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after pituitary suppression on early pregnancy loss and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 9540 normogonadotrophic patients were treated with a GnRH agonist for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Based on the serum concentration of LH on the COS initiation day, patients were divided into low (<1 mIU/mL, n=2838), medium (1-1.49 mIU/mL, n=3357), or high (≥1.5 mIU/mL, n=3345) LH groups and received either fresh embryo transfer (ET) or frozen ET (women with high ovarian response, insufficient endometrial thickness, or requesting frozen ET). A total of 6279 cycles were fresh ET (1960, 2222, and 2097 in the low, medium, and high LH groups, respectively).

INTERVENTIONS

During IVF/ICSI, a GnRH agonist was used to suppress pituitary function in the midluteal phase or follicular phase, and then gonadotropin was used to induce COS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The early pregnancy loss rate (ePLR) and live-birth rate (LBR) for fresh ET, as well as the cumulative ePLR and LBR for the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, were compared.

RESULTS

In the fresh ET cycles, the high, medium and low LH groups had an ePLR of 8.6%, 11.9% and 12.5%, respectively, and LBR of 42.1%, 37.9% and 37.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), late pregnancy loss rate (lPLR), and ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR) among the three LH groups. For the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, the high LH group had a greater number of retrieved oocytes compared with the low and medium LH groups. Among the groups of high, medium and low LH, the cumulative CPR were 72.8%, 69.8% and 68.8%, respectively, and the cumulative LBR were 63.4%, 60.4% and 58.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the cumulative ePLR, lPLR, or EPR. After multivariable logistic regression, compared with the high LH group, the adjusted odds ratio of early pregnancy loss in the low and medium LH group were 1.429 (1.065-1.919, P = 0.018) and 1.389 (1.041-1.853, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

After pituitary suppression by a GnRH-agonist during IVF, a low LH level (<1.5 mIU/mL) on the COS initiation day was associated with adverse ART outcomes-including fewer oocytes, higher ePLR and lower LBR in fresh ET-and lower cumulative CPR and LBR in the entire ovarian-stimulation cycle. And LH on the COS initiation day was an independent factor affecting ePLR after multivariate regression.

The Effect of Luteinising Hormone Suppression in In Vitro Fertilisation Antagonist Cycles

Use of GnRH antagonists in IVF stimulation protocols shortens controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, profound reduction in LH levels has been associated with use of GnRH antagonists. This study aims to determine if LH suppression during GnRH antagonist cycles results in poorer IVF outcomes. This was a prospective pilot longitudinal study where serum LH levels were measured on day 2/3 of the menstrual cycle before COH, 1/2 days following institution of GnRH antagonist and at the day of ovulation trigger. A threshold of LH <0.5 IU/L was used to define profound LH suppression. Data on IVF outcomes was collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors associated with LH suppression following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Ninety-one eligible women were recruited. Women underwent a standard antagonist cycle with Puregon 200u and Ganirelix. No participant had LH <0.5 IU/L prior to GnRH antagonist treatment, and 27 participants (29.7%) had significant LH suppression at either time point. Predictors of profound LH suppression following GnRH antagonist treatment identified (P < 0.20) were age (OR = 0.80, P = 0.013), no previous ovulation induction (OR = 0.26, P = 0.033) and previous GnRH antagonist IVF cycle (OR = 4.32, P = 0.125). Numbers of oocytes, embryos and ongoing pregnancy rates at 12 weeks gestation in patients with and without LH suppression did not differ significantly. We found associations between clinical characteristics and risk of profound LH suppression in women undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles, but no significant differences in IVF and pregnancy outcomes between women with and without significant LH suppression.

Thicker endometrium on hCG trigger day improves the live birth rate of fresh cleavage embryo transfer in GnRH-agonist regimen of normogonadotrophic women

Background

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (PROG) on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day are significantly correlated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. Moreover, LH and PROG are also involved in the functional preparation of the endometrium during the implantation window; however, whether they are related to endometrial thickness (EMT) is still unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess whether EMT has a positive correlation on the live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer (ET), and whether LH and PROG have an impact on EMT.

Methods

A total of 2,260 normogonadotrophic women were treated with a GnRH agonist for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Patients with advanced age and poor ovarian reserve were excluded. The levels of LH, PROG, and EMT on the hCG trigger day were divided into binary variables, respectively, by the cutoff values, and which were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of live birth among LH, PROG and EMT levels on the hCG trigger day, respectively. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to confirm the role of LH, PROG, and EMT on the live birth, and stratified analysis was used to determine whether LH and PROG have an impact on EMT.

Results

EMT and LH were protective factors for live births, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.066–1.157] and 1.696 (95% CI: 1.345–2.139), respectively. However, PROG was a risk factor for live birth, with an OR of 0.635 (95% CI: 0.526–0.766). The hierarchical cross-table analysis indicated that EMT had no significant difference for live birth in the combination of low LH and high PROG group. In the other subgroups, thick EMT was associated with a higher live birth rate (P<0.05).

Conclusions

On hCG trigger day, EMT, LH, and PROG all were independent factors that affected the live birth of fresh ETs. Thick EMT can significantly increase the live birth rate. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that EMT does not affect the live birth rate in combination of low LH and high PROG environment.

Low Serum LH Levels During Ovarian Stimulation With GnRH Antagonist Protocol Decrease the Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers but Have No Impact in Freeze-All Cycles

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between serum LH levels and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within one complete cycle, and the impact of serum LH levels on the live birth rate (LBR) after the initial embryo transfer (ET) considering different ET strategies (fresh or freeze-all).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated reproductive center.

PATIENTS

1480 normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol for the first IVF/ICSI attempt.

INTERVENTIONS

The sample was stratified into low and higher LH groups according to serum LH peak levels of <4 (Group A) and ≥4 IU/L (Group B) during COS. Patients were also sub-grouped into conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles and freeze-all cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The LBR after the initial embryo transfer and the CLBR within one complete cycle.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The numbers of day-3 high-quality embryos, the numbers of embryos available, and the other pregnancy outcomes after the initial ET.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, the CLBRs decreased significantly in the low (63.1% vs. 68.3%, P=.034) LH group compared to the higher LH group. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with low LH levels had lower LBR after fresh ET (38.0% vs. 51.5%, P=.005) but comparable LBR after the first frozen-thawed ET (FET) in freeze-all cycles (49.8% vs. 51.8%, P=.517) than patients with higher LH peak levels. Likewise, patients with low LH levels had lower CLBR for conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles (54.8% vs. 66.1%, P=.015) but comparable CLBR for the freeze-all cycles (66.8% vs. 69.2%, P=.414) than those with higher LH levels. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analyses showed that low LH level was an independent risk factor for the CLBR in the whole cohort (odds ratio (OR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.604-0.965, P=.014) and in patients who underwent the conventional ET strategy (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.408-0.917, P=.017). Moreover, the adverse impact of low LH levels on LBRs maintained statistically significant after fresh transfers (OR: 0.532, 95% CI: 0.353-0.800, P=.002) but not after the first FETs in freeze-all cycles (OR: 0.918, 95% CI: 0.711-1.183, P=.508).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with higher LH levels, low LH levels decrease the CLBRs per oocyte retrieval cycle for normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS using GnRH antagonists. This discrepancy may arise due to the significant detrimental effect of low LH levels on the LBRs after fresh embryo transfers.

A cohort study of both human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone addition at early follicular stage in in vitro fertilization outcome: A STROBE-compliant study

At present, the precise role of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation at an early time of follicular phase on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes remains uncertain.Here infertile women of normal ovarian function undergoing their first cycle of IVF/ICSI were studied and were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1, ovarian stimulation with 150IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone. Group 2, patients received 75IU rFSH and 75IU HMG. Group 3 patients were given 150IU rFSH and 75IU rLH.There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics, ovarian response, the biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 groups. No significant differences were found in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the patients whose LH levels were lower than 0.75 mIU/ml and those above this threshold in group 1. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 group patients whose LH level lower than 0.75 mIU/ml.The results showed that either the addition of HMG or rLH supplementation at an early time of follicular phase produce no significant benefit on IVF outcome in patients with normal ovarian function.

GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the differences of the ovarian stimulation (OS) characteristics, laboratory, and clinical outcomes between follicular-phase single-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

METHODS

About 1883 consecutive IVF/ICSI fresh cycles of normal ovarian responders were retrospectively analyzed, with 1229 in the single-dose GnRH agonist protocol group and 654 in the GnRH antagonist protocol group at Reproductive Medical Center of Tongji Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017.

RESULTS

The follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist group showed significantly more oocytes obtained, higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate, as well as lower luteinizing hormone (LH) level and estradiol (E2)/oocyte ratio on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. However, differences were not significant in meiosis II (MII) oocyte rate, two pronuclear zygote (2PN) embryo rate, viable embryo rate or high-quality embryo rate, compared with the GnRH antagonist group. Further comparison of clinical outcomes in the first frozen-thawed cycles did not show significant difference in either implantation or clinical pregnancy rate between the two protocol groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol may achieve better clinical outcomes in normal ovarian responders, which could be explained more by positive effect on endometrial receptivity rather than embryo quality.

Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles

To evaluate the decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, data were retrospectively collected from 305 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and were treated with GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinization. We compared the percent change in LH concentration from stimulation start to that observed before ovulation triggering in patients with or without anovulation. Anovulatory patients were younger, with higher body mass index (BMI), and demonstrated higher ovarian reserve parameters as compared to ovulatory patients. The decline in LH concentration was almost two-fold greater in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Numbers of oocytes, fertilizations, cleavage stage embryos, and transferred embryos were similar; however, implantation rates were higher in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Older patients (age ≥39) showed a smaller decline in LH levels as compared to younger ones (age <39) and exhibited poor IVF outcomes. There is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonists. Anovulatory patients are more susceptible to GnRH antagonists and therefore demonstrate over-suppression of the pituitary. Older patients demonstrate a reduced pituitary response to GnRH antagonists than younger ones. Cycle scheduling with estradiol pretreatment did not influence LH decline, nor IVF treatment outcomes.

Serum luteinizing hormone level on the third day after ovarian stimulation in GnRH agonist short protocol is predictive of outcome in poor responders but not in normal responders

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether prognostic value of LH measurement in normal responders (NR) is different from poor responders (POR).

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study was conducted among patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with short protocol, with 300 NR and 101 POR, according to Bologna Consensus criteria. LH was measured on 3rd and 5th day after stimulation and HCG administration day.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated among those with LH level on the third day after stimulation (a) below the 25 centile (b) between the 25 and 75 centile and (c) above the 75 centile in women with POR (7.7%, 15.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.02) but not in NR. There was significant correlation between LH ranks and clinical pregnancy rate in POR (p = 0.02) but not in NR. Factors associated with clinical pregnancy rate in POR were age and LH on the third of stimulation, while factors in NR were age, AFC and FSH.

CONCLUSION

LH level on the 3rd day of stimulation was predictive of clinical pregnancy in POR but not in NR.

Randomized trial comparing luteinizing hormone supplementation timing strategies in older women undergoing ovarian stimulation

In this open-label study, women aged 36-40 years undergoing ovarian stimulation were randomized to recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) plus recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) from stimulation day 1 (group A; n = 103), or rhFSH alone (days 1-5) followed by rhFSH plus rhLH from day 6 (group B; n = 99). The primary objective was equivalence in number of oocytes retrieved per patient. The mean (±SD) number of oocytes retrieved was 9.7 (±6.9) in group A and 10.9 (±6.5) in group B; the estimated difference between groups (-1.28 oocytes [95% confidence interval: -3.15 to 0.59]) did not reach the predefined limit of equivalence (±3 oocytes). The study's primary objective was therefore not met. In both groups, a mean (±SD) of 1.9 (±0.6) embryos were transferred per patient. Implantation rates were 24.7% in group A and 13.3% in group B. Clinical pregnancy rates per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 31.6% and 34.4% in Group A, 17.2% and 18.9% in Group B. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was reported in four (group A) and five (group B) patients. The potential benefit of initiating LH supplementation earlier during ovarian stimulation in older women is of interest, warranting further exploration.

Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: a review of their varied clinical applications in assisted reproductive technology

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are often viewed as interchangeable from a functional standpoint because they are highly homologous members of the same glycoprotein hormone family that share a common α-subunit and receptor. However, technological advances yielding highly purified and recombinant gonadotropin preparations have revealed that LH and hCG fulfill different roles, both endogenously and when administered exogenously. These differences are becoming more apparent as the individual hormones are incorporated into the treatment of infertility - a therapeutic area that is continually advancing with the introduction of new agents and emerging clinical trial data. This review examines the unique attributes of LH and hCG that drive their distinctive applications in the treatment of female infertility.

Gonadotropin therapy in assisted reproduction: an evolutionary perspective from biologics to biotech

Gonadotropin therapy plays an integral role in ovarian stimulation for infertility treatments. Efforts have been made over the last century to improve gonadotropin preparations. Undoubtedly, current gonadotropins have better quality and safety profiles as well as clinical efficacy than earlier ones. A major achievement has been introducing recombinant technology in the manufacturing processes for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and human chorionic gonadotropin. Recombinant gonadotropins are purer than urine-derived gonadotropins, and incorporating vial filling by mass virtually eliminated batch-to-batch variations and enabled accurate dosing. Recombinant and fill-by-mass technologies have been the driving forces for launching of prefilled pen devices for more patient-friendly ovarian stimulation. The most recent developments include the fixed combination of follitropin alfa + lutropin alfa, long-acting FSH gonadotropin, and a new family of prefilled pen injector devices for administration of recombinant gonadotropins. The next step would be the production of orally bioactive molecules with selective follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone activity.

Follicular fluid hormonal profile and cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH: effects of recombinant LH administration

PURPOSE

Down-regulation with gonadodropin-releasing agonist (GnRH-a) protocol during IVF stimulation leads to a severe endogenous LH suppression, which may affect the follicular development. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of recombinant LH (r-LH) administration, during late follicular development stages, in recombinant FSH (r-FSH) stimulated cycles on follicular fluid (FF) parameters and on cumulus cell quality.

METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing IVF were stimulated in a long GnRH agonist protocol with r-FSH alone or with r-LH supplementation when the leading follicle reached diameter of 14 mm. FF was collected at the time of oocyte retrieval from 32 follicles ≥ 18 mm. Serum FSH, LH, estradiol (E(2)), and progesterone (P(4)) were evaluated on the day of hCG administration. Intra-follicular E(2), P(4), AMH and TGF-β were assayed. Total RNA from 18 individual cumuli was isolated for gene expression analyses.

RESULTS

R-LH increased FF P(4) levels. FF TGF-β levels and PTGS2 and HAS2 expression in cumulus cells (CCs) positively correlated with increased P(4) levels observed in FFs, while a negative correlation was found between P(4) and AMH levels.

CONCLUSIONS

FF positive correlation between P(4) and TGF-β levels and CC expression of PTGS2 and HAS2 suggest an association with a better follicle quality. In addition, our data suggest that late follicular phase r-LH supplementation leads to a more advanced stage of follicular maturation.

Efficacy of low dose hCG on oocyte maturity for ovarian stimulation in poor responder women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of late follicular administration of low dose hCG on oocyte maturity in poor responding women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized pilot trial was performed on 73 poor responders undergoing ICSI, in Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. All eligible patients underwent a GnRH-a long protocol and were randomly allocated into three study groups for ovarian stimulation: groupA received recombinant FSH alone, group B received recombinant FSH supplemented by 100 IU hCG. Group C received recombinant FSH supplemented by 200 IU hCG. The main endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved.

RESULTS

Of 78 poor responding patients entered to this study, 73 women were considered eligible for enrolment. Of these, 26 women were allocated to receive only recombinant FSH, 24 patients allocated to receive recombinant FSH and 100 IU hCG and 23 patients were assigned to receive recombinant FSH and 200 IU hCG. Number of oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in group B compared to group A (6.5 ± 3.3 versus 4.0 ± 2.3; P = .03). Other cycle and clinical outcomes were comparable between three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that adding 100 IU hCG to rFSH in a GnRH agonist cycle in poor responders improve response to stimulation whereas the number of metaphase II oocytes remains comparable between groups. The existence of a possible trend toward higher mature oocytes and lower total dosage rFSH in patients received 100 or 200 IU hCG is probably due to the small sample size that means further large clinical trials in a more homogenous population is required (clinical trial registration number; NCT01509833).

Effectiveness of a low gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist dose in preventing premature luteinizing hormone rise during controlled ovarian stimulation

The current prospective randomized study was designed to test the efficacy of a low dose (0.125 mg/day) of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix in preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) rise during controlled ovarian stimulation in comparison with the standard dose of 0.25 mg/day. Ovarian stimulation was started with 225 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. Cetrorelix was injected daily from day 6 of gonadotropin administration. Blood was sampled from each woman on day 3 of ovarian stimulation and then daily from day 5 onward up to human chorionic gonadotropin administration for analysis of FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol. LH rise was defined as serum LH ≥ 10 mIU/ml. There were 40 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.25 mg/day and 36 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.125 mg/day. Premature LH rise was recorded in 10% of patients injecting antagonist at 0.25 mg/day and in 14% of patients administered with antagonist at 0.125 mg/day. These frequencies did not differ statistically. In conclusion, our results suggest that a cetrorelix dose of 0.125 mg/day is effective as the standard dose (0.25 mg/day) in preventing premature LH rise during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin may improve in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes in patients with low luteinizing hormone levels after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of low levels of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Military medical center.

PATIENT(S)

General in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) population.

INTERVENTION(S)

Addition of low-dose urinary hCG to IVF stimulations using a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH antagonist protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation and live-birth rates.

RESULT(S)

As part of a larger cohort of 239 patients, 42 patients with LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL were evaluated. In the larger cohort, there were no differences in implantation and pregnancy rates between the recombinant FSH only (n = 113) and the recombinant FSH with low-dose hCG supplementation (n = 126) groups. In the FSH-only group, patients with LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL had decreased implantation rates (19% vs. 42%) and live-birth rates (25% vs. 54%) as compared with patients with LH levels >0.5 mIU/mL. Low LH patients in the recombinant FSH with low-dose urinary hCG group had statistically significantly higher implantation rates (54% vs. 19%) and live-birth rates (64% vs. 25%) as compared with patients with similar low LH levels in the recombinant FSH-only group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Endogenous LH levels ≤ 0.5 mIU/mL after GnRH antagonist treatment are associated with statistically significantly lower implantation and pregnancy rates in recombinant FSH-only cycles. The addition of low-dose urinary hCG results in improved implantation and live-birth rates in patients with low LH levels.

Mid-follicular LH supplementation in women aged 35-39 years undergoing ICSI cycles: a randomized controlled study

This single-centre, randomized, parallel group, comparative study aimed to identify potential benefits of mid-follicular recombinant human LH (r-HLH) supplementation in women aged 35-39 years undergoing ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The main endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved. After pituitary suppression with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, ovarian stimulation was initiated with recombinant human FSH (r-HFSH; 300-450 IU/day). On stimulation day 6, patients were randomized to receive r-HFSH alone or r-HFSH + r-HLH (r-HLH 150 IU/day) for the remainder of the stimulation period. Final follicular maturation was triggered with 250 μg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin. After assessing oocyte nuclear maturity, oocyte were fertilized by ICSI and afterwards embryo quality was analyzed. Of the 131 women enrolled, 68 were allocated to r-HFSH alone and 63 to r-HFSH + r-HLH. No significant differences were observed in markers of either oocyte or embryo quality or quantity. However, higher rates of implantation and live birth per started cycle were observed with r-HLH supplementation than with r-HFSH alone. Although additional large studies are required to further investigate these findings, r-HLH supplementation for women aged 35-39 years undergoing ICSI is recommended as it may have a beneficial action on implantation.

Who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?

LH plays a key role in the intermediate-late phases of folliculogenesis. Although ovarian stimulation is efficiently achieved in most cases by the administration of exogenous FSH alone, specific subgroups of women may benefit from LH activity supplementation during ovarian stimulation. Some authors have found improved outcome with LH activity supplementation in advanced reproductive age women. Experience suggests that in about 10-12% of young normogonadotrophic patients treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol plus recombinant FSH human (r-hFSH), a 'steady response' is observed. In this subgroup of women, a higher number of oocytes is retrieved when daily LH activity supplementation is given from stimulation day 8, if compared with the standard FSH dose increase. Another subgroup of patients who may benefit from LH activity supplementation are those at risk for poor ovarian response treated with GnRH antagonist. Recent data demonstrate that in these women, when GnRH is administered in a flexible protocol, the concomitant addition of recombinant human LH improves the number of mature oocytes retrieved, when compared with the standard GnRH-a flare-up protocol. Thus, well calibrated LH administration improves the ovarian outcome in patients >35 years, in those showing an initial abnormal ovarian response to r-hFSH monotherapy, and in 'low prognosis' women treated with GnRH antagonists.

No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part I, corifollitropin alfa

The relationship between endogenous LH concentrations and ongoing pregnancy rates among normogonadotrophic patients undergoing ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol were examined. In the Engage trial, 1506 patients received corifollitropin alfa (150 μg) or daily recombinant FSH (rFSH) (200 IU) for the first 7 days of stimulation with 0.25mg ganirelix from stimulation day 5. Patients were retrospectively stratified by serum LH percentiles (< 25th, 25th-75th and >75th) on stimulation day 8 and day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Odds ratios (OR) with and without adjustment for predictive factors for ongoing pregnancy were estimated. LH concentration was not associated with pregnancy rates in either treatment arm, in contrast to ovarian response and serum progesterone. With adjustment for these predictors and age, OR (95% confidence interval) for ongoing pregnancy on stimulation day 8 for LH categories < P25 versus ≥ P25, >P75 versus ≤ P75 and < P25 versus >P75 were 0.75 (0.53-1.06), 1.26 (0.87-1.83) and 0.70 (0.46-1.09) in the corifollitropin alfa arm and 0.80 (0.54-1.17), 1.28 (0.87-1.87) and 0.73 (0.46-1.16) in the rFSH arm respectively. There was also no significant difference in pregnancy rates between LH categories on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration with either treatment.

Mid-follicular LH supplementation in women aged 35-39 years undergoing ICSI cycles: a randomized controlled study

This single-centre, randomized, parallel group, comparative study aimed to identify potential benefits of mid-follicular recombinant human LH (r-HLH) supplementation in women aged 35-39 years undergoing ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The main endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved. After pituitary suppression with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, ovarian stimulation was initiated with recombinant human FSH (r-HFSH; 300-450 IU/day). On stimulation day 6, patients were randomized to receive r-HFSH alone or r-HFSH + r-HLH (r-HLH 150 IU/day) for the remainder of the stimulation period. Final follicular maturation was triggered with 250 mug of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin. After assessing oocyte nuclear maturity, oocyte were fertilized by ICSI and afterwards embryo quality was analyzed. Of the 131 women enrolled, 68 were allocated to r-HFSH alone and 63 to r-HFSH + r-HLH. No significant differences were observed in markers of either oocyte or embryo quality or quantity. However, higher rates of implantation and live birth per started cycle were observed with r-HLH supplementation than with r-HFSH alone. Although additional large studies are required to further investigate these findings, r-HLH supplementation for women aged 35-39 years undergoing ICSI is recommended as it may have a beneficial action on implantation.

Outcomes after early or midfollicular phase LH supplementation in previous inadequate responders

Second cycle outcomes of 75 patients who had previous inadequate ovarian response with recombinant FSH (rFSH)-only ovarian stimulation during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) down-regulated cycles were evaluated retrospectively. In these second cycles, both rFSH and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in GnRHa long down-regulation were given to all patients, HMG initiated either on day 1 (group A, n=37) or day 5-6 of the ovarian stimulation (group B, n=38). Total HMG dose was higher (1198+/-514 IU versus 726+/-469 IU; P<0.001), cumulative rFSH consumption was lower (1823+/-804 IU versus 2863+/-1393 IU; P=0.001) and duration of stimulation was shorter (8.94+/-1.15 days versus 10.37+/-1.80 days; P<0.001) in group A than in group B. No significant differences were found regarding fertilization, implantation or pregnancy rates and embryo quality between the groups. Further analysis by supplementary HMG dose (75 IU versus 150 IU) revealed that total gonadotrophin and HMG consumption was lower in 75 IU-supplemented subgroups. Notably, pregnancy rate was higher in patients where 75 IU HMG was supplemented on day 5-6 of ovarian stimulation, which deserves further evaluation.

Ovarian stimulation protocols based on follicle-stimulating hormone glycosylation pattern: impact on oocyte quality and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) with different glycosylation patterns on oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment program.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred eighty-eight infertile couples undergoing assisted fertilization treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

All participants underwent a standard down-regulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue. The patients were randomized into three groups: 63 patients received combined sequential acidic and less-acidic FSH, 65 patients received only less-acidic FSH (recombinant FSH), and 60 received only acidic FSH (human-derived FSH).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of mature metaphase II oocytes, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rates, and implantation rates.

RESULT(S)

The pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically significantly lower in the less-acidic recombinant FSH alone group than in the combined sequential acidic hFSH/less-acidic recombinant FSH, and acidic hFSH alone groups (33.3%, 43.5%, 39% and 17.3%, 24.5%, 20.4%, respectively). Metaphase II oocytes and grade 1 embryos were statistically significantly higher in favor of the combined sequential acidic hFSH/less-acidic recombinant FSH group compared with the less-acidic recombinant FSH alone group.

CONCLUSION(S)

The glycosylation patterns of the two types of FSH implemented for ovarian stimulation have different impacts on oocyte quality and clinical outcome. A sequential combined protocol using both acidic and less-acidic FSH for ovarian stimulation improves oocyte maturity and embryo cleavage, and increases pregnancy and implantation rates.

"hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian stimulation through a long protocol

BACKGROUND

Recently, it has been demonstrated that, in patients down-regulated by GnRH analogues (GnRHa), a short-term pre-treatment with recombinant LH (rLH), prior to recombinant FSH (rFSH) administration, increases the number of small antral follicle prior to FSH stimulation and the yield of normally fertilized embryos. However, no data exist in the literature regarding the potential beneficial effect of "hCG priming" in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) through a long GnRH-a protocol, which binds the same receptor (LH/hCGR), though it is a much more potent compared to LH. The primary aims of this study were to assess the effect of short-term pre-rFSH administration of hCG in women entering an ICSI treatment cycle on follicular development, quality of oocytes and early embryo development. The secondary endpoints were to record the effects on endometrial quality and pregnancy rate.

METHODS

Patients with a history of at least one previous unsuccessful ICSI cycle were randomly assigned into two groups to receive treatment with either a long protocol with rFSH (control group) or a long protocol with rFSH and pre-treatment with hCG (hCG group). In particular, in the latter group, a fixed 7 days course of 200 IU/day hCG was administered as soon as pituitary desensitization was confirmed.

RESULTS

The mean number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, although the percentage of mature oocytes tended to be higher but not significantly different in hCG-treated patients. The percentage of patients with more than one grade 3 embryos was higher in the pre-treatment group, which also showed a higher pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSION

All the above clinical observations, in conjunction with previous data, suggest a point towards a beneficial "hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation through a long GnRH-a down-regulation protocol, particularly in patients with previous ART failures.

hMG increases the yield of mature oocytes and excellent-quality embryos in patients with a previous cycle having a high incidence of oocyte immaturity

In a selected group of patients with >20% oocyte immaturity during an IVF cycle with FSH alone, the addition of hMG to the stimulation protocol results in a higher yield of mature oocytes and excellent-quality embryos.

The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular phase LH concentrations efficiently predicts ART outcomes in women undergoing ART treatment with GnRH-agonist long protocol and stimulation with recombinant FSH

PURPOSE

To establish an index to predict ART outcomes and to identify infertile patients who need LH supplementation during ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

Serum LH concentrations were measured during the mid- and late-follicular phase in 86 normogonadotropic infertile patients who underwent ART treatment using GnRH-agonist long protocol with recombinant-FSH. The relationships between serum LH concentrations at both time points and ART outcomes were retrospectively analyzed, and the relationships between the ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant correlations between the mid- or late-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes. The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations <1.0 was considered the relatively LH decreased group (RD group) and ratio >or= 1.0 was considered the relatively LH increased group (RI group). The number of usable embryos in RD group was similar to that in RI group, but the pregnancy and implantation rates in the RD group (9.7% and 5.8%) were significantly lower than those in the RI group (31.1% and 17.2%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively decreased LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation using GnRH-agonist long protocol with rec-FSH had a negative effect on ART outcomes. Therefore, the ratio of mid- to late-follicular phase LH concentrations is suggested to be an efficient index to identify patients who might benefit from LH supplementation.

Understanding the role of LH: myths and facts

This review summarizes a series of lectures given at a recent Continuing Medical Education meeting in Hamburg, Germany (May 2007), aiming to understand the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in follicular development during the natural menstrual cycle and controlled ovarian stimulation. Clinical situations and target groups of patients who might benefit from LH supplementation during their ovarian stimulation were discussed and defined. The lectures updated knowledge on the physiology of LH during the normal menstrual cycle and the role of LH in ovarian stimulation. The concept of the 'LH window' was presented, and the use of LH supplementation in different groups of patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation was discussed, including those with advanced age, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, pituitary down-regulation and poor response. In addition, the different ways of using LH or human chorionic gonadotrophin supplementation in ovulation induction protocols were described.

Effect of a lower-dose cetrorelix acetate protocol on in-vitro fertilization outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a low initial dosage of cetrorelix acetate could prevent a premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation.

METHOD

Treatment with a recombinant follicle stimulating hormone was started on Day 3 of the menstrual cycle, and 0.125 mg of cetrorelix was injected daily from Day 5 of the ovarian stimulation until the diameter of the dominant follicle reached at least 16 mm. The dosage was then doubled and maintained at 0.250 mg/day until the day before the injection of human chorionic gonadotropin.

RESULT

There was a significant decrease in serum LH concentration 1 day after doubling the cetrorelix dosage, and the LH concentration remained low during the follicular phase. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 18 women (42.8%), with 2 intrauterine fetal deaths before the 12th week.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the cetrorelix dosage from 0.125 to 0.250 mg/day when the follicular size is appropriate can prevent a premature LH surge.

Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve

PURPOSE

To review the available treatments for women with significantly diminished ovarian reserve and assess the efficacy of different ovarian stimulation protocols.

METHODS

Literature research performed among studies that have been published in the Pubmed, in the Scopus Search Machine and in Cohrane database of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

A lack of clear, uniform definition of the poor responders and a lack of large-scale randomized studies make data interpretation very difficult for precise conclusions. Optimistic data have been presented by the use of high doses of gonadotropins, flare up Gn RH-a protocol (standard or microdose), stop protocols, luteal onset of Gn RH-a and the short protocol. Natural cycle or a modified natural cycle seems to be an appropriate strategy. Low dose hCG in the first days of ovarian stimulation has promising results. Molecular biology tools (mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been also considered to assist the management of this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal stimulation for these patients with diminished ovarian reserve remains a great challenge for the clinician, within the limits of our pharmaceutical quiver.

Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of using both urinary and recombinant FSH in a combined protocol for ovarian stimulation in an IVF treatment program.

METHOD

A total of 119 infertile couples undergoing ICSI treatment were randomized prospectively in this study. After a standard down-regulation with GnRH analogue, the patients were randomized in 2 groups 58 received combined urinary and recombinant FSH, starting with uFSH and then rFSH, and 61 controls received only recombinant FSH.

RESULT(S)

Pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in the combined uFSH/rFSH group than the control (rFSH) group (43.9% vs 22.1% and 27.5% vs 13.2% respectively). Metaphase II oocyte and grade 1 embryos were significantly higher in favour of combined uFSH/rFSH group than the recombinant FSH group.

CONCLUSION(S)

This study shows that using a combination of both urinary and recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation improves oocyte maturity and embryo cleavage, and increases pregnancy and implantation rates.

Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the effect of using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome among poor-responder patients.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

University-associated private medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-four patients who had a basal FSH level of >or=10 mIU/mL, who were >or=40 years of age, and who were undergoing their first IVF cycle participated in this controlled trial.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly allocated into two study groups: group A, in which ovarian stimulation included GnRH analogue and rFSH and rLH, and group B, in which patients received GnRH analogue and rFSH without further LH addition.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures included the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval and implantation rate per embryo transferred. The number of days of gonadotropin treatment, E(2) level on rHCG administration day, number of developed follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, number of normally fertilized zygotes (at the two-pronuclear [2PN] stage), cumulative embryo score, and number of transferred embryos were also evaluated.

RESULT(S)

The overall pregnancy rate was 22.61% (19 pregnancies among 84 couples). The pregnancy wastage rate was 30.00% in group A and 22.22% in group B. There were no differences in either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSION(S)

The results of this prospective and randomized trial show that the addition of rLH at a given time of follicular development produces no further benefit in the patient population of our study. A reduced ovarian response cannot be overcome by changes in the stimulation protocol.

Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) supplemented with low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin compared with rFSH alone for ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

Low-dose hCG supplementation was administered at the start of ovarian stimulation, concomitantly with recombinant FSH (rFSH) in GnRH antagonist cycles, and these were compared with GnRH-a cycles that used rFSH alone. The low-dose hCG group had similar implantation and pregnancy rates but had significantly reduced rFSH requirements, allowing for an average cost savings of $600 per cycle.

Clinical effects of ovulation induction with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone supplemented with recombinant luteinizing hormone or low-dose recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in the midfollicular phase in microdose cycles in poor responders

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effects of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or low-dose recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation administered in the midfollicular phase in microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) flare-up cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Private infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 170 women enrolled, with 145 women eligible for randomization.

INTERVENTION(S)

After randomization, 51 patients (group A) received only 600 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as the control group, 46 patients (group B) received 600 IU of recombinant FSH plus daily supplementation with 75 IU of recombinant luteinizing hormone, and 48 patients (group C) received 600 IU of recombinant FSH plus daily supplementation with 75 IU of recombinant hCG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Peak estradiol (E(2)) levels, days of stimulation with recombinant FSH, total recombinant FSH dosage, metaphase II oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rate (positive hCG levels), clinical pregnancy rate (positive fetal cardiac activity), and cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer.

RESULT(S)

The pregnancy rates were 35.1%, 27.6% and 31.2% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rates were 27.1%, 27.5, and 21.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the age, peak serum E(2) concentration, total recombinant FSH dosage, days of stimulation with recombinant FSH, total number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, or cancellation rates of stimulation and embryo transfer among the three groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Additional exogenous LH activity in the form of either recombinant luteinizing hormone or low-dose recombinant hCG is unnecessary in microdose cycles to increase pregnancy rates.

Dynamics of pituitary down-regulation and ovarian response to controlled stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles

The effect of the daily GnRH agonist administration on LH levels and ovarian response after down-regulation was investigated in 2 groups of women who received recombinant FSH versus hMG. The results showed that the pituitary gland remained responsive to the daily buserelin by producing pulses of LH, despite down-regulation in both groups; however, the patients whose condition is profoundly down-regulated may need exogenous LH to improve their response.

Antimüllerian hormone and pituitary gland activity after prolonged down-regulation with goserelin acetate

The size of the pool of growing follicles was normal after prolonged down-regulation, as indicated by normal AMH levels 4 and 8 weeks after goserelin administration. However, there was a profound down-regulation of LH levels; therefore we suggest administration of exogenous LH to proceed to IVF or alternatively stimulation of endogenous LH secretion with daily administration of GnRH agonist. These need to be assessed prospectively.

LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low

The role of LH in the natural menstrual cycle is not disputed. However, there are a variety of opinions regarding the potential role of exogenous LH in ovulation induction and whether it is actually needed. Recent years have seen renewed interest in this issue for several reasons. First, ovulation-inducing drugs are increasingly being administered to normally ovulating women. Second, recombinant human FSH products completely devoid of LH activity are now available. Third, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists and antagonists) prevent the untimely LH surge but also suppress endogenous LH activity during the follicular phase. This review analyses whether or not all patients need LH for follicular growth stimulation and new opportunities for improved treatment as a result of the availability of recombinant human LH both in patients with ovulatory disorders (World Health Organization (WHO) groups I and II anovulatory patients) and those undergoing multiple follicular development for assisted reproduction.

A relative reduction in mid-follicular LH concentrations during GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles leads to lower live birth rates

BACKGROUND

The effect of early- and mid-follicular LH concentrations on the ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated in women receiving pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist and ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) during IVF/ICSI treatment.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected prospectively from 701 cycles (560 patients) of assisted reproduction and analysed retrospectively. On the basis of LH concentrations on stimulation day 7/8, the patients were divided into two groups: LH<1.2 IU/l (n=179) and LH>or=1.2 IU/l (n=522). Cycle outcomes were also compared on the basis of a ratio of mid- to early-follicular LH concentrations (<or=0.5, n=210; >0.5, n=491).

RESULTS

Patients with low LH concentrations were found to have a significant reduction in the late-follicular estradiol concentrations (P<0.001), the number of oocytes retrieved (P<0.01) and the number of usable embryos (P<0.01), and they required significantly more rFSH (430 IU difference, P<0.01). These differences did not translate into a significant change in live birth rates. Conversely, a ratio of <or=0.5 mid- to early-follicular LH concentrations (a reduction of >or=50%) was associated with a significant reduction in live birth rates per embryo transfer and per cycle started (27.3 versus 19.0%, P<0.05 and 22.2 versus 15.8%, P<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Low mid-follicular levels of LH have a significant impact on ovarian response but not on live birth rates. A fall in LH level of >or=50% from the early- to mid-follicular phase resulted in a lower live birth rate.

Is there a need for recombinant human luteinizing hormone (lutropin alfa) supplementation in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction?

Luteinizing hormone is now available as the recombinant product, lutropin alfa for the treatment of female infertility. It is necessary in the natural process of follicular growth and maturation. It is not yet clear which patients really benefit from the addition of this medication to conventional gonadotropin stimulation procedures in infertility treatment. Certainly, it has a proven benefit in patients suffering from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (WHO I). Others may be older patients, patients with a profound gonadotropin suppression stimulated in long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols, or patients with poor ovarian response to conventional stimulation strategies. The available data are reviewed herein.

Pituitary desensitization for eight weeks after the administration of two distinct gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective was to evaluate the duration of pituitary desensitization after the administration of 3.5 mg of triptorelin (T) and leuprolin (L) depot preparations in patients with endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Two groups of 30 patients received, on 21st day of the cycle, 3.75 mg i.m. of triptorelin (T group), and of leuprolin acetate (L group). From the first to the eighth week following gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) administration both groups underwent pelvic ultrasound and serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test and the median test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Pituitary suppression was achieved from two to six and from two to seven weeks after the administration of 3.75 mg of leuprolin and triptorelin, respectively. FSH and LH serum levels were significantly higher in the L group than in the T group after the fourth week.

CONCLUSIONS

Leuprolin and triptorelin depots (3.75 mg) promote satisfactory ovarian suppression lasting for six and seven weeks, respectively, after administration, with significantly different ambient levels of endogenous LH.

Exploiting LH in ovarian stimulation

During intermediate-late phases of human folliculogenesis, LH plays a key role in promoting steroidogenesis and growth of the leading follicle. Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction techniques usually consists of administering exogenous FSH in a low LH environment. Although an impairment in LH-dependent paracrine activities would be expected, multiple follicular growth is efficiently achieved in almost all patients. Thus, there appears to be a discrepancy between classical folliculogenesis models and data from IVF. This study examines the 'interface' between basic endocrinological and clinical evidence, in an attempt to answer two questions: is there an LH therapeutic window, and if there is, how can this be exploited in the practice of assisted reproduction? It also reviews the evidence that specific subgroups of women may benefit from LH supplementation during ovarian stimulation.

Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist on steroidogenesis of low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

The aim of the study was to investigate the cause of the lower estradiol (E(2)) concentration in women treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist compared with those treated with agonist protocol in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Thirty patients who were known low responders were prospectively randomized into two equal groups for IVF treatment. Group 1 used GnRH agonist (flare-up) protocol and group 2 used antagonist protocol. The results showed that serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were significantly higher in the agonist group during the folliculogenesis stage. Despite this higher LH, serum E(2) levels were significantly higher in the agonist group on cycle day 2 only, not on day 5 or day 9. The significantly higher E(2) level in the agonist group reappeared on the day of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). The rate of folliculogenesis in the antagonist group was faster than in the agonist group; therefore their E(2) production should have been higher on hCG day. Furthermore, the rate of decline in E(2) after hCG administration was significantly higher in the antagonist group. These findings, along with the fact that both groups received exogenous LH (human menopausal gonadotropin) that should optimize steroidogenesis and make the difference in E(2) insignificant, enable us to conclude that GnRH antagonists have a suppressive effect on the production of E(2).