A gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus a low-dose oral contraceptive for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis**This work was conducted within the framework of the Italian National Research Council Applied Project “Prevention and Control of Disease Factors,” subproject 5 (Fertility Control), grant no. 91.00131.PF41.115.05532, Milan, Italy.††Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of The American Fertility Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, November 2 to 5, 1992

Pharmacologic Interventions for Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of various medications for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain through a network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register until July 22, 2024. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov for additional data on recently completed trials or potentially eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but found nothing.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The analysis included randomized RCTs that used pharmacologic interventions for managing endometriosis-related pain. The primary efficacy outcome was endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, which included dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. The analysis adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

A total of 31 RCTs involving 8,665 patients were included in the analysis. In terms of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, four interventions demonstrated significantly greater efficacy compared with placebo: leuprolide combined with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.40, 95% CI, -2.41 to -0.38), dienogest (SMD -1.20, 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.61), leuprolide alone (SMD -1.05, 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.45), and combined OCP (SMD -0.67, 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.09). Leuprolide combined with combined OCP emerged as the most effective treatment modality. In addition, elagolix and the combination of vitamin C and vitamin E were identified as the most effective interventions for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. For nonmenstrual pelvic pain, gestrinone demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo and all other interventions.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis indicates that leuprolide in combination with combined OCP, elagolix, vitamins C and E, and gestrinone may represent the most effective therapeutic options for alleviating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. These findings enhance our understanding of the relative efficacy of treatment strategies for pain associated with endometriosis. Future research should focus on conducting larger-scale and rigorously designed clinical trials within the target patient populations to further validate these results.

Management of endometriosis: a call to multidisciplinary approach

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like glands and stroma outside of the uterus. There are three types of endometriotic lesions: superficial or peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and deep infiltrating disease. Endometriosis not only occurs in the pelvis but also can be found in extrapelvic sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, upper abdominal viscera, genitourinary tract, abdominal wall, diaphragm, and thoracic cavity. After thorough history and physical examination is performed, imaging, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), should be obtained if there is high suspicion for deep-infiltrating endometriosis to better assess visceral involvement. Endometriosis can be suspected based on symptoms, physical examination findings, and imaging. However, a definitive diagnosis requires histopathologic confirmation. Treatment options include expectant, medical, and surgical management. Endometriosis is largely a quality-of-life issue, and treatment should be tailored accordingly with empiric medical therapy frequently utilized. Medical management focuses on symptom improvement. Surgical management with excision of endometriosis is preferred over ablation or fulguration of endometriotic lesions. In the case of deep or extrapelvic endometriosis, treatment with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis is essential to minimizing morbidity and increasing long-term success.

Comparative Analysis of Medical Interventions to Alleviate Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 6-10% of women of reproductive age, with pain and infertility being its primary symptoms. The most common aspects of pain are overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Our aim was to compare the available medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases to assess available drug options for pain management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating various medical treatments for endometriosis-related pain on different pain scales were included. Results were presented as p-scores and, in cases of placebo controls, as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). From the available data, a network meta-analysis was carried out. Results: The search yielded 1314 records, of which 45 were eligible for data extraction. Eight networks were created, and a total of 16 treatments were analyzed. The highest p-score, meaning greatest pain relief (p-score: 0.618), for the treatment of dysmenorrhea was achieved using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for 3 months on a scale of 0-100. Additionally, a p-score of 0.649 was attained following a 6-month treatment with GnRH agonists combined with hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). In the case of dyspareunia on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, CHCs (p-score: 0.805) were the most effective, and CHCs combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.677) were the best treatment option following 6 months of treatment. In the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs (p-score: 0.751) yielded the highest p-score on a scale of 0-100 following 3 months of treatment, and progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors (p-score: 0.873) following 6 months of treatment. Progestins (p-score: 0.901) were most effective in cases of overall pelvic pain on a scale of 0-3 following 3 months of treatment. Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis showed that in cases of dysmenorrhea, GnRH agonists supplemented with CHCs reduced pain the most following 3 months of treatment. Regarding dyspareunia CHCs were most effective, and in the case of overall pelvic pain, CHCs or progestins combined with aromatase inhibitors yielded the most desirable results.

A systematic literature review on patient-reported outcome domains and measures in nonsurgical efficacy trials related to chronic pain associated with endometriosis: an urgent call to action

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis, a common cause for chronic pelvic pain, significantly affects quality of life, fertility, and overall productivity of those affected. Therapeutic options remain limited, and collating evidence on treatment efficacy is complicated. One reason could be the heterogeneity of assessed outcomes in nonsurgical clinical trials, impeding meaningful result comparisons. This systematic literature review examines outcome domains and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials. Through comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL up until July 2022, we screened 1286 records, of which 191 were included in our analyses. Methodological quality (GRADE criteria), information about publication, patient population, and intervention were assessed, and domains as well as PROMs were extracted and analyzed. In accordance with IMMPACT domain framework, the domain pain was assessed in almost all studies (98.4%), followed by adverse events (73.8%). By contrast, assessment of physical functioning (29.8%), improvement and satisfaction (14.1%), and emotional functioning (6.8%) occurred less frequently. Studies of a better methodological quality tended to use more different domains. Nevertheless, combinations of more than 2 domains were rare, failing to comprehensively capture the bio-psycho-social aspects of endometriosis-associated pain. The PROMs used showed an even broader heterogeneity across all studies. Our findings underscore the large heterogeneity of assessed domains and PROMs in clinical pain-related endometriosis trials. This highlights the urgent need for a standardized approach to both, assessed domains and high-quality PROMs ideally realized through development and implementation of a core outcome set, encompassing the most pivotal domains and PROMs for both, stakeholders and patients.

Clinical Management of Endometriosis in Menopause: A Narrative Review

Endometriosis, an inflammatory disease primarily affecting the pelvis and peritoneum, manifests with pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, and infertility. Despite its ubiquity, the management of endometriosis is challenging due to its heterogeneous presentation, limitations in diagnostic methods, variable therapeutic responses, and personal and socio-cultural impact on quality of life. This review attempts to consolidate the current literature on endometriosis occurring during and beyond menopause, and to present details regarding management strategies that take into account individual outcomes and goals when managing this condition. The topics included in this review are the clinical features and differential diagnosis of pelvic pain in postmenopausal patients, imaging considerations, serum and laboratory biomarkers, indications for surgery, the principles of hormone replacement therapy, the de novo development of endometriosis after menopause, and malignant transformation. Each topic includes a summary of the current literature, utilizing clinical research, case reports, and expert opinion. Despite a better understanding of the impact of endometriosis beyond menopause, there are many limitations to this condition, specifically with regard to cancer risk and indications for surgery. The existing evidence supports the use of shared decision making and the incorporation of patient preferences in guiding clinical management. Future research endeavors must shed light on the natural history of postmenopausal endometriosis through longitudinal studies in order to foster a deeper understanding of its complicated disease course across women's lifespans.

A review of phase II and III drugs for the treatment and management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disease that gives rise to pelvic pain and infertility. Although estroprogestins and progestins currently stand as the first-line treatments for this condition, demonstrating efficacy in two-thirds of patients, a significant portion of individuals experience only partial relief or symptom recurrence following the cessation of these therapies. The coexistence of superficial, deep endometriosis, and ovarian endometriomas, as three distinct phenotypes with unique pathogenetic and molecular characteristics, may elucidate the current heterogeneous biological response to available therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to furnish the reader with a comprehensive summary pertaining to phase II-III hormonal treatments for endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing research endeavors are directed toward the development of novel hormonal options for this benign yet debilitating disease. Among them, oral GnRH antagonists emerge as a noteworthy option, furnishing rapid therapeutic onset without an initial flare-up; these drugs facilitate partial or complete estrogen suppression, and promote prompt ovarian function recovery upon discontinuation, effectively surmounting the limitations associated with previously employed GnRH agonists. Limited evidence supports the use of selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators. Consequently, further extensive clinical research is imperative to garner a more profound understanding of innovative targets for novel hormonal options.

Clinical Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of the Available Medical Options in the Treatment of Endometriosis-Related Pelvic Pain: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

In this scoping review, we sought to identify published studies evaluating the drugs currently used in the treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain, with reflection on their chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted with the use of the PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases, focusing on identifying articles published in English between January 1990 and 2023.

RESULTS

Based on the included studies, current therapy options for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain identified and reviewed in this article were: (1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; (2) combined oral contraceptive (COCs); (3) progestins; (4) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists; (5) aromatase inhibitors (AIs); (6) selective estrogen and progesterone receptor modulators; and (7) levonorgestrel-intrauterine device.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the published evidence, clinicians should consider NSAIDs, COCs, and progestins as the first-line medical therapies. Compared with second-line options, such as GnRH agonists/antagonists or AIs, the abovementioned first-line options are well tolerated, efficacious, and exhibit lower overall price. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evaluate the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration.

Clinical Diagnosis and Early Medical Management for Endometriosis: Consensus from Asian Expert Group

This work provides consensus guidance regarding clinical diagnosis and early medical management of endometriosis within Asia. Clinicians with expertise in endometriosis critically evaluated available evidence on clinical diagnosis and early medical management and their applicability to current clinical practices. Clinical diagnosis should focus on symptom recognition, which can be presumed to be endometriosis without laparoscopic confirmation. Transvaginal sonography can be appropriate for diagnosing pelvic endometriosis in select patients. For early empiric treatment, management of women with clinical presentation suggestive of endometriosis should be individualized and consider presentation and therapeutic need. Medical treatment is recommended to reduce endometriosis-associated pelvic pain for patients with no immediate pregnancy desires. Hormonal treatment can be considered for pelvic pain with a clinical endometriosis diagnosis; progestins are a first-line management option for early medical treatment, with oral progestin-based therapies generally a better option compared with combined oral contraceptives because of their safety profile. Dienogest can be used long-term if needed and a larger evidence base supports dienogest use compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) as first-line medical therapy. GnRHa may be considered for first-line therapy in some specific situations or as short-term therapy before dienogest and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as add-on therapy for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

The Double Engines and Single Checkpoint Theory of Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by the ectopic localization of the endometrial tissue in the peritoneal cavity. Consequently, it causes local pathological changes and systemic symptoms, affecting at least one in every ten women. This disease is difficult to diagnose early, it is prone to dissemination, is difficult to eradicate, tends to recur, and is regarded as “a cancer of no kill”. Indeed, the development of endometriosis closely resembles that of cancer in the way of mutagenesis, pelvic spreading, and immunological adaptation. While retrograde menstruation has been regarded as the primary cause of endometriosis, the role of ovulation and menstrual stimuli in the development of endometriosis has long been overlooked. The development of ovarian and peritoneal endometrioses, similar to the development of high-grade serous carcinoma in the fallopian tube fimbriae with intraperitoneal metastasis, depends highly on the carcinogens released during ovulation. Moreover, endometriosis carries an extremely hypermutated genome, which is non-inferior to the ultra-mutated endometrial cancer. The hypermutation would lead to an overproduction of new proteins or neoantigens. Because of this, the developing endometriosis may have to turn on the PD-1/PDL-1 “self-tolerance” checkpoint to evade immune surveillance, leaving an Achilles tendon for an immune checkpoint blockade. In this review, we present the double engines and single checkpoint theory of the genesis of endometriosis, provide the current pieces of evidence supporting the hypothesis, and discuss the new directions of prevention and treatment.

Estro-Progestins and Pain Relief in Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a benign, hormone-responsive chronic disease that affects women of reproductive age; long-term treatment to balance satisfactory tolerability with clinical efficacy is necessary for these patients. The first-line therapy for endometriosis is predominantly medical treatment, in order to improve symptoms or prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. Multiple factors including age and women preference, pain severity, and endometriosis stage must be considered in the choice of the most suitable therapy. Estrogen-progestogins are generally used as first-line hormone therapies among different medical options currently effective for endometriosis management. Several studies have shown that they are able to improve pain symptoms in most patients, are well tolerated, and are inexpensive. Combined hormonal contraception treatment, administered cyclically or continuously, with different types of hormones and route of administration, results in clinically noticeable decrease in dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and recurrence rate after surgery, and also in quality of life improvement.

Dienogest and the Risk of Reoperation in Endometriosis

Background: This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in reoperation rates between patients who used dienogest (DNG) and patients who did not use DNG. Methods: Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) data generated between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2018, we identified women with an endometriosis diagnosis code who used GnRH agonists after gynecological surgery. Among them, women prescribed DNG were selected as the DNG group, and those who did not receive DNG were selected as the control group. A survival analysis of the reoperation between the two groups was performed. Results: DNG and control groups were extracted from 9735 people each. The reoperation rates were 0.4% and 0.6% in the DNG and control groups, respectively, without adjusting. In the Cox proportional risk analysis, DNG use increased the reoperation rate {hazard ratio (HR), 1.599; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005–2.545}. The site of endometriosis and the number of GnRH agonist injections were not associated with reoperation (HR, 1.008; 95% CI, 0.739–1.374; HR, 1.062; 95% CI, 0.690–1.635). In the subgroup survival analysis, according to the period between the last GnRH agonist injection and the first DNG dose, DNG did not increase the reoperation rates up to 9 months (~3 months: HR, 0.968; 95% CI, 0.551–1.699; 4~6 months: HR, 1.094; 95% CI, 0.58–2.063; 7~9 months: HR, 2.419; 95% CI, 0.735–7.962), but DNG increased the reoperation rate from 10 months onwards (10~12 months: HR, 3.826; 95% CI, 1.164–12.579 and ~13 months: HR, 8.436; 95% CI, 4.722–15.072). Conclusions: Women who used DNG had a higher endometriosis reoperation rate than women who did not use DNG. However, the initiation of DNG treatment within nine months after the last GnRH agonist injection did not affect the endometriosis reoperation rate.

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. This chronic and recurring condition occurs in women of reproductive age. It is a common cause of pain or infertility and can cause non-specific symptoms such as lower back pain, dyspareunia (pain during or after intercourse), and dysmenorrhoea (menstrual pain). Endometriosis is an oestrogen-dependent disease. Medical treatment aims to relieve symptoms and shrink lesions by suppressing the normal menstrual cycle. In this review, we consider medication specifically aiming to modulate oestrogen receptors as an alternative method of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in the management of endometriosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for trials in the following databases (from their inception to 28 May 2020): Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Studies (CRS Online), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and registers of ongoing trials. In addition, we searched all reference lists of included trials, and we contacted experts in the field, in an attempt to locate trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with placebo, no treatment, other medical treatment, or surgery for endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data using data extraction forms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for reporting dichotomous data. Primary review outcomes were relief of pelvic pain and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, recurrence rate, and economic and fertility outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included only one RCT, which included 93 women, comparing the SERM raloxifene with placebo in biopsy-proven endometriosis. All women first underwent complete surgical excision of all lesions. Evidence was of very low quality: the main limitation was imprecision - with very sparse data from only one small study, which included only women after surgical treatment. Relief of pelvic pain The included study did not specifically measure the primary outcome of pain relief. Study authors reported that time to return of pelvic pain (defined as two months of pain equal to or more severe than pain at study entry) was more rapid in the raloxifene group (P = 0.03). Adverse events The included study reported adverse events such as pelvic pain, ovarian cyst, headache, migraine, and depression. We are uncertain whether raloxifene improves the incidence of pelvic pain (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.45), ovarian cysts (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.43), headache (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.43), migraine (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.95), depression (RR 1.96, 95% CI 0.63 to 6.06), or other adverse events (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.30) (all: 1 study, n = 93; very low-quality evidence). Quality of life The study described a statistically significant difference in mental health quality of life (QoL) by 12 months, in favour of placebo treatment (mean difference 11.1, 95% CI 0.01 to 21.19). Other QoL data did not differ between groups but were not reported in detail. Recurrence rate, fertility, and economic outcomes We are uncertain whether raloxifene improves the recurrence rate of endometriosis, proven by biopsy, when compared to placebo (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.21; 1 study, n = 93; very low-quality evidence). This suggests that if 28% of women taking placebo have biopsy-proven recurrence of endometriosis, between 19% and 62% of those taking raloxifene will do so. These outcomes are prone to bias, as not all women had an actual second laparoscopy. Recurrence based on symptoms (non-menstrual pain, dysmenorrhoea, or dyspareunia) was described; in these cases, symptoms improved after use of raloxifene as well as after use of placebo. The included study did not report data on economic outcomes. No comparative data were available on pregnancy, as the study included only women who agreed to postpone pregnancy until after the study endpoint; the few pregnancies that did occur were uneventful but were regarded as an adverse event.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on a single, small RCT and incomplete data, we are uncertain of the effects of SERMs on pain relief in surgically treated patients with endometriosis. The included study was stopped prematurely because of higher pain scores among women who took SERMs when compared to scores among those receiving placebo. Further research is needed to fully evaluate the role of SERMs in endometriosis.

Role of medical treatment of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic benign disease that affects women of reproductive age. Medical therapy is often the first line of management for women with endometriosis in order to ameliorate symptoms or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. Currently, there are several medical options for the management of patients with endometriosis and long-term treatments should balance clinical efficacy (controlling pain symptoms and preventing recurrence of disease after surgery) with an acceptable safety-profile. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, being efficacious in relieving primary dysmenorrhea. Combined oral contraceptives and progestins, available for multiple routes of administration, are commonly administered as first-line hormonal therapies. Several studies demonstrated that they succeed in improving pain symptoms in the majority of patients; moreover, they are well tolerated and not expensive. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonists are prescribed when first line therapies are ineffective, not tolerated or contraindicated. Even if these drugs are efficacious in treating women not responding to COCs or progestins, they are not orally available and have a less favorable tolerability profile (needing an appropriate add-back therapy). Because few data are available on long-term efficacy and safety of aromatase inhibitors they should be reserved only for women with symptoms who are refractory to other treatments only in a research environment. Almost all of the currently available treatment options for endometriosis suppress ovarian function and are not curative. For this reason, research into new drugs is unsurprisingly demanding. Amongst the drugs currently under investigation, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have shown most promise, currently in late-stage clinical development. There is a number of potential future therapies currently tested only in vitro, in animal models of endometriosis or in early clinical studies with a small sample size. Further studies are necessary to conclude whether these treatments would be of value for the treatment of endometriosis.

Progression of deep infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules

STUDY QUESTION

What is the risk of progression of deep endometriotic nodules infiltrating the rectosigmoid?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There is a risk of progression of deep endometriotic nodules infiltrating the rectosigmoid, particularly in menstruating women.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Currently, there is a lack of acceptance in the literature on the probability that deeply infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules progress in size.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted a monocentric case-control study between September 2016 and March 2018 at Rouen University Hospital. We enrolled 43 patients who were referred to our tertiary referral centre with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid, who had undergone two MRI examinations at least 12 months apart and had not undergone surgical treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis during this interval.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

MRI images were reinterpreted by a senior radiologist with experience and expertise in endometriosis, who measured the length and thickness of deep infiltrating colorectal lesions. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were tested on 30 randomly selected cases. We defined 'progression' of a nodule as an increase of ≥20% in length or in thickness and 'regression' of a lesion as a decrease of ≥20% in length or in thickness between two MRIs. Any nodule for which the variation in length and thickness was <20% was considered as 'stable'. Patients were divided into three groups based on evidence of progression, regression or stability of deep endometriotic nodules between their two MRI examinations. The total length of any period of amenorrhoea between the two MRI examinations, due to pregnancy, breastfeeding or hormonal treatment, was recorded. The total proportion of the time between MRIs where amenorrhoea occurred was compared between groups.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Eighty-six patients underwent at least two MRIs for deep endometriosis infiltrating the sigmoid or rectum between September 2016 and March 2018. Of these, we excluded 10 patients with an interval of <12 months between MRIs, 10 patients who underwent surgery between MRIs, 17 patients for whom at least 1 MRI was considered to be of poor quality and 6 patients for whom no deep colorectal lesion was found on repeat review of either MRI. This resulted in a total of 43 patients eligible for enrolment in the final analysis. Mean time (SD) between MRIs was 38.3 (22.1) months. About 60.5% of patients demonstrated stability of their colorectal lesions between the two MRIs, 27.9% of patients met the criteria for 'progression' of lesions and 11.6% met the criteria for 'regression' of lesions. There was no significant difference in time interval between MRIs for the three groups (P = 0.76). Median duration of amenorrhoea was significantly lower in women with progression of lesions (7.5 months) when compared to those with stability of lesions (8.5 months) or regression of lesions (21 months) (P < 0.001). Median duration of amenorrhoea (expressed as percentage of total time between two MRIs) was also found to be significantly lower in the group demonstrating progression (15.1%) when compared to the group demonstrating stability (19.2%) and the group demonstrating regression (94.1%; P = 0.006). Progression of rectosigmoid nodules was observed in 34% of patients without continuous amenorrhoea, in 39% who had never had amenorrhoea and in no patients with continuous amenorrhoea.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Due to a lack of universally accepted criteria for defining the progression or regression of deep endometriotic nodules on MRI, the values used in our study may be disputed. Due to the retrospective design of the study, there may be heterogeneity of interval between MRIs, MRI techniques used, reason for amenorrhoea and duration of amenorrhoea. The mean inter-MRI interval was of short duration and varied between patients. Our findings are reported for only deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid and cannot be extrapolated, without caution, to nodules of other locations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Patients with deeply infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules, for which surgical management has not been performed, should undergo surveillance to allow detection of growth of nodules, particularly when continuous amenorrhoea has not been achieved. This recommendation is of importance to young patients with rectosigmoid nodules who wish to conceive, in whom first line ART is planned. There is a very low risk of progression of deep endometriotic nodules infiltrating the rectosigmoid in women with amenorrhoea induced by medical therapy, lactation or pregnancy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No funding was received for this study. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study.

Endometriosis Pain Management: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the up-to-date pain management options and recommendations for the challenging disease, endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mainstays of endometriosis advances of both surgical and medical management continue to evolve. Experimental pharmaceuticals include Gestirone, and aromatase inhibitors have shown promise but are still under scrutiny. Surgical techniques include laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation/resection and presacral neurectomy. No studies have directly compared medical versus surgical management, and as such, no one treatment modality can be recommend as superior to the other. Patients may initially be given a medical diagnosis and treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neurolepitcs, OCP, GNRH agonists/antagonists, and Danazol. Assessing the success of these regimens has proved difficult. Surgical management relies on various methods including excision/ablation of the lesions, nerve ablation, neurectomy, hysterectomy, and oophorectomy.

Evaluation of goserelin effectiveness based on assessment of inflammatory cytokines and symptoms in uterine leiomyoma

Background Uterine leiomyoma is a benign tumour of the uterine smooth muscles associated with an elevated level of inflammatory cytokines. Goserelin, a synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, suppresses the production of sex hormones and release of inflammatory cytokines in uterine leiomyoma cells. Objective The primary objective of this study was to find out the effectiveness of subcutaneous goserelin therapy on lowering serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and improving uterine leiomyoma-related symptoms in female patients diagnosed with uterine leiomyoma. The secondary objective was to assess the tolerability to goserelin therapy used in the management of this tumour. Setting Outpatient gynaecological clinic of the medical consultation department of Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Baghdad province, Iraq. Methods A single centre, prospective, longitudinal, cohort study was carried out on female patients diagnosed with uterine leiomyoma. Goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection was given in a consecutive monthly dose for the total time duration of three months. Serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 were detected before and after goserelin therapy in a consecutive monthly assessment. The study also assessed the improvement in uterine leiomyoma-related symptoms, including pelvic pain alongside the incidence of goserelin-related side effects during therapy schedules. Main Outcome Measures Assessment of serum levels of tumour necrosis factor-α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 alongside uterine leiomyoma-related symptoms, including pelvic pain and goserelin-related side effects. Results There was a significant decrease in serum levels of tumour necrosis factor-α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 compared to the baseline level over the 3-month duration of goserelin therapy (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.74 ± 0.19) pg/mL; (0.07 ± 0.00 vs. 0.44 ± 0.18) pg/mL respectively. Patients showed a clinical improvement regarding uterine leiomyoma-related symptoms following each of the consecutive monthly doses of goserelin therapy (n = 11, 55%, P < 0.0001; n = 15, 75%, P < 0.0001; n = 18, 90%, P < 0.0001) respectively. This also includes a significant decrease in the intensity of leiomyoma-related pelvic pain before and after goserelin therapy (7.2 ± 1.43 vs. 3.05 ± 1.14, P < 0.0001). The majority of patients reported vaginal dryness (60%) as the main goserelin-related side effect. Conclusion Goserelin therapy reduces serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor- α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1, improving leiomyoma-related symptoms with good tolerability in patients with uterine leiomyoma.

SOMA-trial: surgery or medication for women with an endometrioma? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and cohort study

STUDY QUESTIONS

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of women suffering from pain due to an ovarian endometrioma when compared to treatment with medication (analgesia and/or hormones). The primary outcome is defined as successful pain reduction (-30% reduction of pain) measured by the numeric rating scale (NRS) after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life, affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness, recurrence rate, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve, adjuvant surgery and budget impact.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Evidence suggests that both medication and surgical treatment of an ovarian endometrioma are effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life. However, there are no randomised studies that compare surgery to treatment with medication.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This study will be performed in a research network of university and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. A multicentre randomised controlled trial and parallel prospective cohort study in patients with an ovarian endometrioma, with the exclusion of patients with deep endometriosis, will be conducted. After obtaining informed consent, eligible patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment arm (medication or surgery) by using web-based block randomisation stratified per centre. A successful pain reduction is set at a 30% decrease on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Based on a power of 80% and an alpha of 5% and using a continuity correction, a sample size of 69 patients in each treatment arm is needed. Accounting for a drop-out rate of 25% (i.e. loss to follow up), we need to include 92 patients in each treatment arm, i.e. 184 in total. Simultaneously, a cohort study will be performed for eligible patients who are not willing to be randomised because of a distinct preference for one of the two treatment arms. We intend to include 100 women in each treatment arm to enable standardization by inverse probability weighting, which means 200 patients in total. The expected inclusion period is 24 months with a follow-up of 18 months.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Premenopausal women (age ≥ 18 years) with pain (dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain or dyspareunia) and an ovarian endometrioma (cyst diameter ≥ 3 cm) who visit the outpatient clinic will make up the study population. Patients with signs of deep endometriosis will be excluded. The primary outcome is successful pain reduction, which is defined as a 30% decrease of pain on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life and affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness (from a healthcare and societal perspective), number of participants needing additional surgery, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve and recurrence rate of endometriomas. Measurements will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study is funded by ZonMw, a Dutch organization for Health Research and Development, project number 80-85200-98-91041. The Department of Reproductive Medicine of the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc has received several research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck KGaA and Ferring not related to the submitted work. B.W.J. Mol is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V. Mijatovic reports grants from Guerbet, grants from Merck and grants from Ferring outside the submitted work. All authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning this publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Register (NTR 7447, http://www.trialregister.nl).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

2 January 2019.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

First inclusion in randomised controlled trial October 4, 2019. First inclusion in cohort May 22, 2019.

Novel Drug Targets with Traditional Herbal Medicines for Overcoming Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a disease in which the lining of the endometrium is found outside of the uterus. Recent medical treatments for endometriosis have adverse effects, limiting their long-term use. Furthermore, the recurrence of the disease after the cessation of therapy is quite common, and most patients need to continue treatment to maintain a hypoestrogenic environment till conception. Notwithstanding recent advances in computational and chemical practices, traditional medicines are considered the most consistent sources for the discovery of new drugs. Numerous medicinal plants and plantderived compounds have been tested against gynecological disorders, mainly endometriosis. This review aimed to describe the pharmacological activity profile of the medicinal plants and their active ingredients and draw attention to the discovery of multitargeted drug molecules for rational therapy.

Clinical Management of Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common and challenging condition of reproductive-aged women that carries a high individual and societal cost. The many molecular dissimilarities between endometriosis lesions and eutopic endometrium create difficulties in the development of new drug therapies and treatments. Surgery remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, but it must be weighed against the risks of surgical morbidity and potential decreases in ovarian reserve, especially in the case of endometriomas. Safe and effective surgical techniques are discussed within this article for various presentations of endometriosis. Medical therapy is suppressive rather than curative, and regimens that are long-term and affordable with minimal side effects are recommended. Recurrences are common and often rapid when medical therapy is discontinued. Endometriosis in the setting of infertility is reviewed and appropriate management is discussed, including when and whether surgery is warranted in this at-risk population. In patients with chronic pain, central sensitization and myofascial pain are integral components of a multidisciplinary approach. Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, the risk is low and currently no preventive screening is recommended. Hormone therapy for symptomatic women with postsurgical menopause should not be delayed as a result of concerns for malignancy or recurrence of endometriosis.

Signaling through non-membrane nuclear phosphoinositide binding proteins in human health and disease

Phosphoinositide membrane signaling is critical for normal physiology, playing well-known roles in diverse human pathologies. The basic mechanisms governing phosphoinositide signaling within the nucleus, however, have remained deeply enigmatic owing to their presence outside the nuclear membranes. Over 40% of nuclear phosphoinositides can exist in this non-membrane state, held soluble in the nucleoplasm by nuclear proteins that remain largely unidentified. Recently, two nuclear proteins responsible for solubilizing phosphoinositides were identified, steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1; NR5A1) and liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1; NR5A2), along with two enzymes that directly remodel these phosphoinositide/protein complexes, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN; MMAC) and inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK; ipk2). These new footholds now permit the assignment of physiological functions for nuclear phosphoinositides in human diseases, such as endometriosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis, glioblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The unique nature of nuclear phosphoinositide signaling affords extraordinary clinical opportunities for new biomarkers, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Thus, phosphoinositide biology within the nucleus may represent the next generation of low-hanging fruit for new drugs, not unlike what has occurred for membrane phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase drug development. This review connects recent basic science discoveries in nuclear phosphoinositide signaling to clinical pathologies, with the hope of inspiring development of new therapies.

Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition which affects many women of reproductive age worldwide and is a major cause of pain and infertility. The combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) is widely used to treat pain occurring as a result of endometriosis, although the evidence for its efficacy is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of oral contraceptive preparations in the treatment of painful symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of laparoscopically proven endometriosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following from inception to 19 October 2017: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Studies Online (CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). We also handsearched reference lists of relevant trials and systematic reviews retrieved by the search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) of the use of COCPs in the treatment of women of reproductive age with symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of endometriosis that had been made visually at a surgical procedure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. One review author was an expert in the content matter. We contacted study authors for additional information. The primary outcome was self-reported pain (dysmenorrhoea) at the end of treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials (612 women) met the inclusion criteria. Only three trials (404 women) provided data that were suitable for analysis.Combined oral contraceptive pill versus placeboTwo trials compared COCP with a placebo. These studies were at high risk of bias. For GRADE outcomes (self-reported pain (dysmenorrhoea) at the end of treatment), the quality of the evidence very low. Evidence was downgraded for imprecision as it was based on a single, small trial and for the visual analogue scale data there were wide confidence intervals (CIs). There appeared to have been substantial involvement of the pharmaceutical company funding the trials.Treatment with the COCP was associated with an improvement in self-reported pain at the end of treatment as evidenced by a lower score on the Dysmenorrhoea verbal rating scale (scale 0 to 3) compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) -1.30 points, 95% CI -1.84 to -0.76; 1 RCT, 96 women; very low quality evidence), a lower score on the Dysmenorrhoea visual analogue scale (no details of scale) compared with placebo (MD -23.68 points, 95% CI -28.75 to -18.62, 2 RCTs, 327 women; very low quality evidence) and a reduction in menstrual pain from baseline to the end of treatment (MD 2.10 points, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.82; 1 RCT, 169 women; very low quality evidence).Combined oral contraceptive pill versus medical therapiesOne underpowered trial compared the COCP with another medical treatment (goserelin). The study was at high risk of bias; the trial was unblinded and there was insufficient detail to judge allocation concealment and randomisation. For GRADE outcomes (self-reported pain (dysmenorrhoea) at the end of treatment), the quality of the evidence ranged from low to very low.At the end of treatment, the women in the goserelin group were amenorrhoeic and therefore no comparisons could be made between the groups for the primary outcome. At six months' follow-up, there was no clear evidence of a difference between women treated with the COCP and women treated with goserelin for measures of dysmenorrhoea on a visual analogue scale (scale 1 to 10) (MD -0.10, 95% CI -1.28 to 1.08; 1 RCT, 50 women; very low quality evidence) or a verbal rating scale (scale 0 to 3) (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.99 to 0.79; 1 RCT, 50 women; very low quality evidence). At six months' follow-up, there was no clear evidence of a difference between the COCP and goserelin groups for reporting complete absence of pain as measured by the visual analogue scale (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% CI 0.02 to 8.43; 1 RCT, 50 women; very low quality evidence) or the verbal rating scale (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08; 1 RCT, 49 women; low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited evidence from two trials at high risk of bias and limited data for the prespecified outcomes for this review, there is insufficient evidence to make a judgement on the effectiveness of the COCP compared with placebo and the findings cannot be generalised.Based on the limited evidence from one small trial that was at high risk of bias, there is insufficient evidence to make a judgement on the effectiveness of the COCP compared with other medical treatments. Only one comparison was possible, with the medical intervention being goserelin, and the findings cannot be generalised.Further research is needed to fully evaluate the role of COCPs in managing pain-related symptoms associated with endometriosis. There are other formulations of the combined hormonal contraception such as the transdermal patch, vaginal ring or combined injectable contraceptives which this review did not cover but should be considered in future updates.

Does exist a correlation between endometriosis and thrombophilic disorders? A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

At present, there is growing evidence of the existence of a genetic predisposition in both thrombophilic disorders and endometriosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate for the first time the prevalence of some thrombophilic disorders in patients with endometriosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 138 patients with endometriosis and 278 healthy control women. All women were subjected to a blood examination testing for thrombophilic screening and the variables examinated were: hyperhomocysteinemia, factor V Leiden and factor II prothrombin G20210A mutations in heterozygosis and homozigosis.

RESULTS

A significant reduced prevalence (p < 0.05) of factor V Leiden mutation in endometriosis patients was found, whereas no significant differences (p = NS) for factor II and hyperhomocysteinemia were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data do not show any association between thrombophilic condition and endometriosis. Before assuming hormonal therapies, a thrombophilic plasmatic screening seems to be unnecessary in patients affected by endometriosis.

[Endometriosis medical treatment: Hormonal treatment for the management of pain and endometriotic lesions recurrence. CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

The available literature, from 2006 to 2017, on hormonal treatment has been analysed as a contribution to the HAS-CNGOF task force for the treatment of endometriosis. Available data are heterogeneous and the general level of evidence is moderate. Hormonal treatment is usually offered as the primary option to women suffering from endometriosis. It cannot be used in women willing to conceive. In women who have not been operated, the first line of hormonal treatment includes combined oral contraceptives (COC) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intra uterine system (52mg LNG-IUS). As a second line, desogestrel progestin only pills, etonogestrel implants, GnRH analogs (GnRHa) with add back therapy and dienogest can be offered. Add back therapy should include estrogens to prevent bone loss and improve quality of life, it can be introduced before the third month of treatment to prevent side effects. The literature does not support preoperative hormonal treatment for the sole purpose of reducing complications or recurrence, or facilitating surgical procedures. After surgical treatment, hormonal treatment is recommended to prevent pain recurrence and improve quality of life. COCs or LNG IUS are recommended as a first line. To prevent recurrence of endometriomas COC is advised and maintained as long as tolerance is good in the absence of pregnancy plans. In case of dysmenorrhea, postoperative COC should be used in a continuous scheme. GnRHa are not recommended in the sole purpose of reducing endometrioma recurrence risk.

[Medical treatment of endometriosis: Hormonal treatment of pain, impact on evolution and future perspectives]

CONTEXT

Endometriosis is a chronic painful disease, for which hormone therapy is usually offered as a first line option to women not willing to conceive.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse and synthesize the literature, from 2006 onwards, on pain control, and disease evolution in oemn using combined hormonal contraceptives, progestins and GnRH analogs. Data on other current and future treatment perspectives is included as well.

SOURCES

Medline (Pubmed), the Cochrane Library, and endometriosis treatment recommendations published by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and Société des Obstétriciens et Gynécologues du Canada (SOGC).

STUDY SELECTION

Meta-analysis and clinical trials are included.

RESULTS

Study quality is heterogeneous in general. Hormone therapy inconstantly allows pain relief and prevention of endometrioma and rectovaginal wall nodules recurrence. Available molecules and routes of administration as well as risk benefit balance are evaluated. Data on future perspectives are limited to date and do not allow use in routine.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal treatment of endometriosis relies on combined hormonal contraceptives (using different routes of administration), progestins and particularly the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS, and GnRH analogs as a last option, in combination with an add-back therapy. Promising alternatives are currently under preclinical and clinical evaluation.

Endometriosis-associated Pain in Patients with and without Hormone Therapy

Introduction

Endometriosis is associated with both cyclic and non-cyclic pelvic pain. Many patients do not remain symptom free, even after guideline-oriented treatment. This study aimed to identify differences in endometriosis-associated pain and test for possible associations with hormone therapy.

Methods

The results presented here are based on a cross-sectional study conducted at the Charité Endometriosis Center in Berlin in which pain profile data were collected via a questionnaire from women with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis. The questionnaire contained items concerning cyclic and non-cyclic pain, pain intensity, and pain duration. SPSS software was used to perform the statistical analysis, including descriptive and analytical statistics.

Results

Of 239 women surveyed, 121 (50.6%) reported current hormone therapy, and 185 (77.4%) reported previous hormone therapy. Moreover, 84% had current (cyclic and non-cyclic) pain symptoms, which were severe enough to warrant treatment in nearly 70% of all cases. Hormone therapy was only found to be associated with a slight, non-significant advantage in patients with “cyclic pain”. The reverse was true of non-cyclic pain: women on hormone therapy reported a greater incidence of pain, greater pain intensity, more frequent need for treatment, and more pain days.

Conclusions

With a very broad interpretation of our findings, it can be concluded that hormone therapy achieves some degree of pain reduction via down-regulation of the ovarian cycle, at least in the case of cyclic pain, whereas non-cyclic pain does not respond or no longer responds to hormones.

Aberrant PTEN expression in response to progesterone reduces endometriotic stromal cell apoptosis

In some human cancer cells, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) is known to regulate autophagy induction positively through the inhibition of PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to the activation of mTOR, a major negative regulator of autophagy. Recent studies reported that PTEN expression is abnormally decreased in endometriotic lesions. In endometriosis, abnormal PTEN expression may contribute to the alteration of endometrial cell autophagy, which may affect apoptosis because endometrial cell autophagy is directly involved in the regulation of apoptosis. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the involvement of PTEN in the regulation of autophagy induction in human normal endometrial stromal cells (NESCs). In addition, we sought to determine whether aberrant PTEN expression in endometriotic cyst stromal cells (ECSCs) is associated with autophagy dysregulation, and a subsequent decrease in apoptosis. Our results show that PTEN expression was enhanced by progesterone treatment in NESCs. Subsequently, autophagy and apoptosis induction increased through the inhibition of AKT and mTOR activity. This progesterone-induced increase in apoptosis was reversed by the inhibition of autophagy induction using either mifepristone (progesterone receptor modulator) or PTEN inhibitor. In contrast, progesterone had no significant effects on PTEN expression, AKT, mTOR activity, autophagy or apoptosis in ECSCs. Furthermore, in contrast to normal eutopic endometrium, endometriotic tissues have constant PTEN expression, autophagy and apoptosis throughout the menstrual cycle. In conclusion, our results suggest abnormal PTEN expression in response to progesterone was observed in ECSCs, which led to the dysregulation of autophagy induction via AKT/mTOR signalling and a subsequent decrease in apoptosis.

Pain Associated with Endometriosis: Therapeutic Options

Defined as the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease that affects 7–10% of reproductive-age women, causing pain, infertility or both, resulting in serious life disruption, emotional and physical suffering, and decreased productivity. The observation that endometriosis is more common in women with early ménarche, polymenorrhea, outflow genital tract obstruction or a family history of disease suggests that its development depends on the complex interaction of genetic, immunological, environmental and hormonal factors. Current therapies for the management of endometriosis are medical, surgical or both. Medical therapies induce a hypoestrogenic state to reduce menstrual flow and apoptosis of endometriotic lesions. They include androgenic or progestational compounds and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, which are comparably effective but have very different adverse-effect profiles. Consequently, the choice of which medical treatment to prescribe may not be based on differences in efficacy but on differences in tolerability, safety and, when everything else is equal, cost. Although surgery to remove endometriosis is effective in relieving pain and restoring fertility, recurrence of symptoms is common and repeated medical and surgical interventions are often needed. The need for additional surgery may be reduced by the thorough excision of all lesions and disease at the initial surgery, followed by the postoperative administration of hormonal suppressive therapy with progestins to induce hypomenorrhea or amenorrhea. Definitive surgery with hysterectomy and removal of ovaries is frequently curative. Future therapies should be directed at identifying women at risk for the disease and implementing interventions that will prevent disease development altogether. Ultimately, the goal is to make endometriosis a disease of the past.

Extended-Cycle Oral Contraceptive Pills with 10 μG Ethinyl Estradiol Pills in Place of Placebo Pills

The elimination of monthly withdrawal bleeding with use of extended-cycle (84 pills) monophasic birth-control pills has modernized oral contraceptives. The use of ethinyl estradiol 10 μg pills in place of the seven placebo pills addresses the problems posed by 21/7 formulations of low-dose birth-control pills, which allow early stimulation of ovarian follicles, and of the early 84/7 formulations, which had higher rates of unscheduled bleeding and spotting.

Effects of low-dose combined drospirenone-ethinylestradiol on perimenstrual symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a 24/4-day regimen of a low-dose combination drospirenone-ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive in alleviating perimenstrual symptoms among Japanese women with endometriosis.

METHODS

The present prospective, non-randomized study enrolled women diagnosed with endometriosis radiographically or surgically at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine hospital, Japan, between December 1, 2010 and August 31, 2013. Patients received treatment with oral drospirenone-ethinylestradiol for six treatment cycles. Dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia severity were assessed using visual analog scale scores after three and six treatment cycles, and changes in perimenstrual symptoms were assessed using the menstrual distress questionnaire (MDQ) scores.

RESULTS

In total, 46 patients were recruited for the study. Dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia were all significantly reduced after both three and six treatment cycles in comparison with baseline (P<0.001 for all comparisons). After six treatment cycles, significant reductions were observed for all menstrual MDQ measures and for the premenstrual water retention and negative-effect MDQ measures (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination drospirenone-ethinylestradiol was effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and somatic/psychological symptoms in Japanese women with endometriosis.

Primary Umbilical Endometriosis: Case Report

Introduction

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue, including glands and stroma, located outside of the uterine cavity.

Case Report

We report the case of a 26-year-old patient who presents cyclical omphalorrhagia. Upon physical examination, a bluish nodule at the umbilical level and a tumor in the retro-cervical septum are found. Diagnosis is made of primary umbilical endometriosis (PUE) and deep endometriosis. Umbilical nodule resection and confirmatory diagnostic laparoscopy are performed, with good evolution afterwards. In relation to the pathophysiology of endometriosis, it is considered a chronic disease which includes genetic, epigenetic, inflammatory and hormone-dependent factors. As for PUE, vascular or lymphatic dissemination may explain the presence of umbilical implants. Another theory for this is coelomic metaplasia.

Conclusions

PUE is an extremely rare condition, with only 59 reported cases in the last 25 years. Its treatment of choice is surgical.

Selection of key recommendations for the management of women with endometriosis by an international panel of patients and professionals

STUDY QUESTION

Can the differences in patients' and professionals' perspective regarding essential endometriosis care be accommodated in one set of key recommendations?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Consensus between patients and professions on a key set of recommendations for essential endometriosis care was achieved.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Guideline development alone will not lead to healthcare improvement. Quality indicators are needed to monitor actual care and guideline adherence. These can help with better implementation of the ESHRE guidelines in European hospitals and thereby improve the quality of endometriosis care. The first step in the development of quality indicators is to select a compact set of key recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION

Using a RAND modified Delphi method, this study reports the systematic selection of key recommendations based on the ESHRE guideline 'Management of Women with Endometriosis' by an international expert panel of both patients and professionals during the study period of September 2015 and December 2015.

PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS

An international panel of patients (n = 10) and medical professionals (n = 11) rated and prioritized the 83 recommendations extracted from the ESHRE guideline for relevance in three rounds. A strict consensus methodology was used to select key recommendations. The main outcome measure was one set of key recommendations for endometriosis care.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A representative set of 17 key recommendations was selected from the preliminary set of 83 recommendations. This selection covers all dimensions of endometriosis care, including diagnosis, treatment of endometriosis-associated pain, treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility and miscellaneous topics such as prevention, menopause and relationship with cancer. Of the 21 experts, 17 participated in at least one round while 16 (76.2%) participated in all 3 rounds.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The feasibility of the selected key recommendations was not assessed in this study. As not all panel members took part in all three rounds, some response bias may have occurred.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This set of key recommendations is the first step in the development of quality indicators for monitoring and improving endometriosis care. The set is generic and can be used in hospitals internationally. A practice test should be conducted to assess the feasibility of our key recommendations in clinical practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

No funding was received for the conduct of this study. Members of the EndoKey study group did not receive payment. The authors and members of the EndoKey study group have no conflict of interest.

Optimal uterine anatomy and physiology necessary for normal implantation and placentation

The authors review aberrations of uterine anatomy and physiology affecting pregnancy outcomes with IVF. In the case of endometriosis and hydrosalpinx, pathologies outside of the uterus alter the uterine endometrium. In the case of endometriosis, Dominique de Ziegler outlines the numerous changes in gene expression and the central role of inflammation in causing progesterone resistance. With endometriosis, the absence of ovarian function inherent in deferred transfer, with or without a more lengthy suppression of ovarian function, appears to be sufficient to restore normal function of eutopic endometrium. Because laparoscopy is no longer routine in the evaluation of infertility, unrecognized endometriosis then becomes irrelevant in the context of assisted reproductive technology. With hydrosalpinx and submucus myomas, the implantation factor HOXA-10 is suppressed in the endometrium and, with myomas, even in areas of the uterus not directly affected. Daniela Galliano reviews various uterine pathologies, the most enigmatic being adenomyosis, where the endometrium also manifests many of the changes seen in endometriosis and deferred transfer with extended suppression appears to provide the best outcomes. Ettore Cicinelli's group has extensively studied the diagnosis and treatment of endometritis, and although more definitive diagnosis and care of this covert disorder may await techniques such as sequencing of the endometrial microbiome, it undoubtedly is an important factor in implantation failure, deserving our attention and treatment.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for treating endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic disease requiring long-term therapy. Therefore, the choice of medical treatment should be based on efficacy, preference of patients, incidence and severity of adverse effects and cost.

AREAS COVERED

This review briefly summarizes the currently available medical treatment for endometriosis. The treatments most recently proposed for endometriosis will be described in detail, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and the flexible extended combined oral contraceptive.

EXPERT OPINION

The oral contraceptive pill and progestogens allow for the treatment of the majority of patients with endometriosis. The flexible extended dosing regimen, containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol, may be particularly useful in patients suffering severe dysmenorrhea and improving the adherence and compliance with treatment. GnRH agonists may be used in patients resistant to first-line therapy; up to now, limited data are available on the use of GnRH antagonist (such as elagolix) in patients with endometriosis. AIs should be regarded as experimental therapies and used only in patients with symptoms resistant to other therapies; however, the use of these drugs is limited by the possibility to administer the treatment for short-term periods only (6 months) and, similarly to GnRH antagonists, by the high incidence of adverse effects, requiring the use of add-back therapy.

Current strategies for endometriosis management

Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disorder that persists throughout the reproductive years. Although endometriosis is a surgical diagnosis, medical management with ovarian suppression remains the mainstay of long-term management with superimposed surgical intervention when needed. The goal of surgery should be excision or ablation of all visible disease to minimize risk of recurrence and need for repeat surgeries. When infertility is the presenting symptom, surgical therapy in addition to assisted reproductive technology can improve chances of conception; however, the treatment approach depends on stage of disease and other patient characteristics that affect fecundity.