Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Depo-Provera users. II. Effects on ovarian function

The potential for intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as a self-bridging emergency contraceptive

Objective

To examine the rate of ovulatory disruption when intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is administered across graded stages of dominant follicle development.

Study design

We assigned enrolled participants to one of three preassigned dominant follicle size groups: 12-14 mm, 15–17 mm and ≥ 18 mm. We followed dominant follicles via serial transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) until the follicles reached their assigned size, at which time we administered DMPA. For 5 consecutive days thereafter, we followed the follicles via TVUS to observe follicle rupture and obtained serum luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, and progesterone concentrations. In the following 2 weeks, we collected serum progesterone concentrations twice weekly to detect possible ovulatory delay or dysfunction. We also collected serum medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) concentrations at 1 and 24 h after DMPA administration to examine against ovulatory outcomes.

Results

Twenty-six of 29 enrolled women completed the study. DMPA suppressed ovulation in 17/26 (65%) and caused ovulatory dysfunction in 1/26 (4%) participants. Larger follicles were more likely to rupture despite DMPA (12–14 mm: 0/10 (0%); 15–17 mm: 3/10 (30%); ≥ 18 mm: 6/6 (100%); p < .01). Pre-DMPA LH concentrations ranged from 13.8 to 93.7 IU/L (mean 49.0 IU/L) in cases of follicle rupture. We observed no cases of follicle rupture when DMPA was administered through cycle day 12. All 24-h MPA concentrations exceeded those needed for ovulation suppression.

Conclusion

DMPA suppressed and additionally disrupted ovulation in 65% and 4% of observed cycles, respectively. DMPA may provide effective emergency contraception as well as ongoing contraception if administered prior to an expected ovulation and specifically before the LH surge.

Implications

DMPA may be an alternative form of emergency contraception that can also self-bridge to ongoing contraception. As ovulation was not observed among any follicles when DMPA was given through cycle day 12, women who initiate DMPA up through cycle day 12 may not require backup contraception.

Levonorgestrel butanoate intramuscular injection does not reliably suppress ovulation for 90 days in obese and normal-BMI women: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

We performed a pilot evaluation of a new formulation of levonorgestrel butanoate (LB) designed to be a long-acting injectable (6 months) contraceptive to determine pharmacodynamic end points in normal-body mass index (BMI) and obese women.

STUDY DESIGN

Obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and normal-BMI, otherwise healthy, women received a single intramuscular injection of LB after ovulation was confirmed in a baseline cycle. The primary outcome was return of ovulation in days.

RESULTS

A total of 14 women enrolled and completed the study [normal BMI n=9, median BMI 22.7kg/m² (range 19.4-25.8); obese n=5, median BMI 35.7kg/m² (30.1-39.2)]. The first 6 subjects (normal BMI=4/9, obese BMI=2/5) received 40 mg of LB, and the remaining 8 received 20 mg. All women except one returned to ovulation prior to 6 months. Return to ovulation occurred earlier in the obese group; 3/5 obese and 0/9 normal BMI subjects returned to ovulation within 90 days (p=.03). No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

Return to ovulation was earlier than 6 months in both BMI groups but more so in the obese BMI group.

IMPLICATIONS

Since return of ovulation was earlier than expected for this LB injectable formulation, additional steps are needed to develop a preparation suitable as a longer-lasting product.

Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 8 - Progestin-Only Contraception

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for health care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and on the promotion of healthy sexuality.

OUTCOMES

Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the relative cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 1994 to January 2015 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., contraception, sexuality, sexual health) and key words (e.g., contraception, family planning, hormonal contraception, emergency contraception). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English from January 1994 to January 2015. Searches were updated on a regular basis in incorporated in the guideline to June 2015. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of the evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). CHAPTER 8: PROGESTIN-ONLY CONTRACEPTION: Summary Statements Recommendations.

Incidental Finding of Persistent Hydatidiform Mole in an Adolescent on Depo-Provera

Molar pregnancies represent an uncommon yet important obstetric problem with potentially fatal outcomes. Patients typically present with signs and symptoms of early pregnancy, and physicians most often suspect nonmolar pregnancy complications initially; however a hydatidiform mole should be included in the differential diagnosis of a woman with a positive pregnancy test and abnormal vaginal bleeding irrespective of the use of contraception. Our case is that of an adolescent female on Depo-Provera injectable contraceptive with increased vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting who was incidentally found to be pregnant and subsequently diagnosed with a molar pregnancy despite persistent denial of having initiated sexual intercourse. Though gestational trophoblastic disease is uncommon with an incidence of about 1-2 cases per 1,000 pregnancies, a clinician has to display a high index of suspicion when dealing with patients at extremes of age in order to avoid potentially life-threatening outcomes.

A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction between ulipristal acetate (UPA) 30 mg for emergency contraception and a daily progestin-only contraceptive pill, desogestrel (DSG) 0.75 mg, when initiated the next day?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In this study, DSG impaired the ability of UPA to delay ovulation, but UPA had little impact on the onset of contraceptive effects due to DSG.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraceptive (EC) at the dose of 30 mg. UPA delays ovulation by at least 5 days when administered in the mid to late follicular phase. In theory, potent progestins could reactivate progesterone signaling that leads to follicle rupture, thereby impacting the effectiveness of UPA as EC. In addition, UPA could alter the onset of the contraceptive effect of progestin-containing contraceptives started immediately after UPA.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A single-blind (for observer), placebo-controlled, partial crossover study was conducted in two sites [Dominican Republic (DR) and the Netherlands (NDL)] over 11 months from October 2012 to September 2013. Healthy female volunteers participated in two of the three treatment cycles separated by a washout cycle. Treatment combinations studied were as follows: (i) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days, (ii) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 20 days of placebo matching that of DSG (PLB2) or (iii) one tablet of placebo-matching UPA (PLB1) followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days. Participants were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences (UPA + DSG/UPA + PLB2, PLB1 + DSG/UPA + DSG and UPA + PLB2/PLB1 + DSG) when a lead follicle was ≥ 14 to <16 mm diameter on transvaginal ultrasound imaging (TVU).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 71 women were included, and 49 were randomized to a first treatment combination of the three period sequences (20 in the DR and 29 in the NDL); 41 of the 49 continued and completed two treatment combinations (20 in the DR and 21 in the NDL).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Initiating DSG treatment the day after UPA significantly reduced the ovulation delaying effect of UPA (P = 0.0054). While ovulation occurred in only one of the 29 UPA-only cycles (3%) in the first 5 days, it occurred in 13 of the 29 (45%) UPA + DSG cycles.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This was a small, descriptive, pharmacodynamic study in which some findings differed by study site. Distinguishing between a cystic corpus luteum and a luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) by TVU was difficult in some cases; however, the investigators reached consensus, when the study was still blinded, regarding ovulation based on hormone levels and careful review of daily TVU images.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Initiating the use of a DSG progestin-only pill (POP) immediately after UPA reduces the ability of UPA to delay ovulation and thus may decrease its efficacy as EC. If starting a DSG POP after using UPA for EC, and possibly any progestin-only method, consideration should be given to delaying for at least 5 days after UPA intake in order to preserve the ovulation delaying effects of UPA.

Initiation of progestogen-only injectables on different days of the menstrual cycle and its effect on contraceptive effectiveness and compliance: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Initiation of contraceptive progestogen-only injections conventionally require that women delay starting them until menses begin, during which time interval a woman may be at risk of unintended pregnancy. Our objective was to determine from the literature when a woman can initiate progestogen-only injectables for contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for all articles (in all languages) published in peer-reviewed journals between database inception to February 2012, for evidence relevant to starting injectables on different days of the menstrual cycle and its impact upon contraceptive effectiveness or those that examined different strategies for initiation and their effects on compliance and continuation.

RESULTS

Eight articles met our criteria for inclusion. All studies examined initiation of depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA); no studies of norethisterone enantate were identified. Three articles, reported that when DMPA was initiated later than Cycle Day 7, ovulation occurred in some women. Approximately 90% of women had poor quality cervical mucus within 24 h after they received an injection. Five studies of compliance and continuation demonstrated that the use of another contraceptive method as a "bridging option" was not successful in helping women initiate DMPA. When DMPA was given throughout the menstrual cycle, more women were eligible to receive their first injection but only about half returned on time for their subsequent injection and some pregnancies occurred.

CONCLUSION

Ovulation is rare when DMPA is provided within the first 7 days of the menstrual cycle. Use of another contraceptive as a "bridging option" until DMPA can be initiated has been unsuccessful in helping women initiate DMPA and is associated with higher rates of pregnancy.

Missed hormonal contraceptives: new recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidance for women and their health care providers on the management of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptive doses in order to prevent unintended pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles published in English, from 1974 to 2007, about hormonal contraceptive methods that are available in Canada and that may be missed or delayed. Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate reproductive health and family planning organizations were also reviewed. The quality of evidence is rated using the criteria developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This committee opinion will help health care providers offer clear information to women who have not been adherent in using hormonal contraception with the purpose of preventing unintended pregnancy.

SPONSORS

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Instructions for what women should do when they miss hormonal contraception have been complex and women do not understand them correctly. (I) 2. The highest risk of ovulation occurs when the hormone-free interval is prolonged for more than seven days, either by delaying the start of combined hormonal contraceptives or by missing active hormone doses during the first or third weeks of combined oral contraceptives. (II) Ovulation rarely occurs after seven consecutive days of combined oral contraceptive use. (II) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Health care providers should give clear, simple instructions, both written and oral, on missed hormonal contraceptive pills as part of contraceptive counselling. (III-A) 2. Health care providers should provide women with telephone/electronic resources for reference in the event of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptives. (III-A) 3. In order to avoid an increased risk of unintended pregnancy, the hormone-free interval should not exceed seven days in combined hormonal contraceptive users. (II-A) 4. Back-up contraception should be used after one missed dose in the first week of hormones until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. In the case of missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of hormones, the hormone-free interval should be eliminated for that cycle. (III-A) 5. Emergency contraception and back-up contraception may be required in some instances of missed hormonal contraceptives, in particular when the hormone-free interval has been extended for more than seven days. (III-A) 6. Back-up contraception should be used when three or more consecutive doses/days of combined hormonal contraceptives are missed in the second and third week until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. For practical reasons, the scheduled hormone-free interval should be eliminated in these cases. (II-A) 7. Emergency contraception is rarely indicated for missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of the cycle unless there are repeated omissions or failure to institute back-up contraception after the missed doses. In cases of repeated omissions of combined hormonal contraceptives, emergency contraception may be required, and back-up contraception should be used. Health care professionals should counsel women in these situations on alternative methods of contraception that do not demand such stringent compliance. (III-A).

Effective use of hormonal contraceptives: Part II: Combined hormonal injectables, progestogen-only injectables and contraceptive implants

Our objective in this systematic review was to evaluate evidence regarding controversial issues in the clinical management of women using injectable and implantable contraceptives. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports of primary research, published from 1966 through April 2005 in peer-reviewed journals, related to the initiation of combined or progestogen-only injectables and contraceptive implants, the effects of late contraceptive injections or the duration of levonorgestrel implant effectiveness. Results of the studies we reviewed showed that initiating injectable and implantable contraceptives through day 7 of the menstrual cycle suppresses follicular activity. Time to ovulation after study participants discontinued using injectables varied widely: from 4 to 8 weeks after the last administration of combined injectables, from 15 to 49 weeks after the last injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and from 5 to 19 weeks after the last injection of norethisterone enanthate. Norplant implants left in place for up to seven completed years remained effective among women who weighed <70 kg at the time of implant insertion, but their effectiveness decreased among women weighing >or=70 kg.

A prospective study of immediate initiation of depo medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive injection

Traditional protocols for depo medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) initiation mandate that women start the method during the first 5-7 days of the menstrual cycle. Women who do not have their initial clinic visit during this time period are generally instructed to return to clinic during menses to begin DMPA, which often leaves them insufficiently protected from pregnancy. An alternative approach is to give women the injection immediately during the clinic visit, regardless of menstrual cycle day. In this prospective study, we evaluated a protocol for immediate DMPA initiation among 149 women who presented on cycle day 8 or later. Ninety-two percent (n = 137) of subjects returned for a follow-up pregnancy test, but half of all subjects required multiple reminders to return for the visit. There were three pregnancies. Forty-seven percent (n = 70) continued to a second DMPA injection or another contraceptive method within 14 weeks of their initial clinic visit. Factors associated with returning for repeat injection included satisfaction with DMPA, older age and finding it easy to return for the follow-up pregnancy test visit.

Immediate monthly combination contraception to facilitate initiation of the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive injection

Conventional clinical protocols specify that women initiate depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) within 7 days of the onset of menses, and product labeling specifies initiation within 5 days. Women outside of this window should wait until next menses to begin, often leaving them with inadequate interim contraceptive protection. An alternative is for women to initiate monthly hormonal contraception immediately, as a bridge to DMPA, with a scheduled follow-up appointment about 4 weeks later. We evaluated bridge preferences and DMPA initiation among 150 women requesting DMPA who were ineligible for their first injection at the time of clinic visit due to menstrual cycle day. Ninety-eight percent (n = 147) rejected the standard protocol of waiting with condoms or abstinence in favor of a hormonal bridge method. Ninety-seven percent follow-up (n = 146) showed that 86% were satisfied with their bridge method. There were no posttreatment pregnancies, and 55% (n = 81) of participants had initiated DMPA or another long-term contraceptive within 4 weeks of their initial clinic presentation.

Delayed first injection of the once-a-month injectable contraceptive containing 25 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg of E(2)-cypionate: effects on ovarian function

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether women who were administered the first injection of DMPA+E(2)C on day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed injection) exhibit the same degree of ovarian suppression as women who receive it on day 5 of their menstrual cycle.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Reproductive health clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Women aged between 18 and 38 years (inclusive) willing to use DMPA+E(2)C as their method of contraception.

INTERVENTION(S)

Participants received a DMPA+E(2)C injection on day 5 (control group, n = 41) or day 7 (delayed-injection group, n = 117) of their menstrual cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ovarian activity and follicular development determined by serial serum progesterone levels and vaginal ultrasound.

RESULT(S)

Participants who received DMPA+E(2)C on day 5 of their menstrual cycle (control group) exhibited no more than limited follicular growth (no follicle >16 mm). Of those women who received DMPA+E(2)C on day 7 of their menstrual cycle (delayed-injection group), 21 (18%) showed some follicular growth, of whom 4 (3%) ovulated.

CONCLUSION(S)

The first injection of DMPA+E(2)C given on day 7 of a menstrual cycle does not provide the same inhibition of ovarian activity as that observed when it is administered on day 5 of the menstrual cycle.

Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users. II. Effect on the ovarian function in the first cycle of use

The objective of this study was to time the onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users, when the capsules were inserted beyond the first 7 days of the cycle, based on the immediate effect on the ovarian activity. A total of 42 healthy women requesting Norplant implant contraception were enrolled at clinics in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and in Baltimore, Maryland. Implants were inserted on days 8-13 of the menstrual cycle. Blood samples for estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), luteinizing hormone (LH) (in a subset of 12 women), and levonogestrel (LNG) assay, were taken at 0 h and at 6, 12, 24, 72, and 168 h postinsertion. Ovulation, as defined by P > 2.5 ng/mL, occurred in 40% of subjects. A short lasting, frequently blunted, LH peak occurred within 12 h postinsertion, in all these subjects. The remaining subjects had anovulatory cycles with two distinct E2 profiles: continuously increasing E2 levels to a high mean of 414.3 pg/mL (28%), or no sustained increase in E2 (32%). Most cycles (86%) in which Norplant was inserted with high E2 levels (> 175 pg/mL) were ovulatory, whereas none were ovulatory with low E2 (< 100 pg/mL) at insertion. Based on the endocrine effects of Norplant implant insertion in the midadvanced follicular phase, in which ovulation will either occur within 48 h of insertion or will be impaired, additional contraceptive protection is necessary only for 3 days.