Mechanical lithotripsy of common bile duct stones

Recent advances in the management of difficult bile-duct stones: a focus on single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy

The most effective and the standard treatment for bile duct stones (BDSs) is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, in 10% to 15% of patients with BDSs, the stones cannot be removed by conventional ERCP, which involves endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by balloon or basket extraction. Additional techniques or devices are often necessary to remove these difficult bileduct stones, including endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation to make a larger papillary opening and/or mechanical lithotripsy to fragment the stones. Advances in cholangioscopy have made possible electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy under direct cholangioscopic visualization during ERCP. Cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy could be another good option in the armamentarium of techniques for removing difficult BDSs. Here we review endoscopic techniques based on single-operator cholangioscopy for the management of difficult BDSs.

Dilation assisted stone extraction for complex biliary lithiasis: Technical aspects and practical principles

Common bile duct stones are frequently diagnosed worldwide and are one of the main indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been used for the removal of bile duct stones for the past 40 years, providing a wide opening to allow extraction. Up to 15% of patients present with complicated choledocholithiasis. In this context, additional therapeutic approaches have been proposed such as endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy, intraductal or extracorporeal lithotripsy, or endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). EPLBD combined with EST was introduced in 2003 to facilitate the passage of large or multiple bile duct stones using a balloon greater than 12 mm in diameter. EPLBD without EST was introduced as a simplified technique in 2009. Dilation-assisted stone extraction (DASE) is the combination of two techniques: EPLBD and sub-maximal EST. Several studies have reported this technique as safe and effective in patients with large bile duct stones, without any increased risk of adverse events such as pancreatitis, bleeding, or perforation. Nevertheless, it is difficult to analyze the outcomes of DASE because there are no standard techniques and definitions between studies. The purpose of this paper is to provide technical guidance and specific information about the main issues regarding DASE, based on current literature and daily clinical experience in biliary referral centers.

Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 10-15% of the cases, conventional methods for removing bile duct stones by ERCP/balloon-basket extraction fail. The purpose of this review is to describe endoscopic techniques in managing these "difficult bile duct stones."

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with balloon extraction ± mechanical lithotripsy is the initial approach used to retrieve large bile duct stones. With advent of digital cholangioscopy, electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy are gaining popularity. Enteroscopy-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approaches can be used for those with gastric bypass anatomy. Difficulties in removing bile duct stones can be related to stone-related factors such as the size and location of the stone or to altered anatomy such as stricture in the bile duct or Roux-en-Y anatomy. Several endoscopy approaches and techniques have described in the recent past that have greatly enhanced our ability to remove these "difficult" bile duct stones.

Giant choledocholithiasis treated by mechanical lithotripsy using a gastric bezoar basket

Mechanical lithotripsy (ML) is usually considered as a standard treatment option for large bile duct stones. However, it is impossible to retrieve oversized stones because the conventional lithotripsy basket may not be able to grasp the stone. However, there is no established endoscopic extraction method for such giant stone removal. We describe a case of successful extraction of a 4-cm large stone using a gastric bezoar basket. A 78-year-old woman had suffered from upper abdominal pain for 20 d. Contrast-enhanced computed tomogram revealed a 4-cm single stone in the distal common bile duct (CBD). Endoscopic stone retraction was decided upon and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was performed using a large balloon. An attempt to capture the stone using a standard lithotripsy basket failed due to the large stone size. Subsequently, we used a gastric bezoar basket to successfully capture the stone. The stone was fragmented into small pieces and extracted. The stone was completely removed after two sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; each of which took 30 min. No complications occurred during or after the procedure. The patient was fully recovered and discharged on day 11 of hospitalization. ML using a gastric bezoar basket is a safe and effective retrieval method in select cases, and is considered as an alternative nonoperative option for the management of difficult CBD stones.

Success rate and complications of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones over 2 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

Clinically, common bile duct (CBD) stones >2 cm are difficult to remove by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). To evaluate this observation, the rates of successful clearance of CBD stones and complications were compared between ERCP extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm and <2 cm in diameter.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai First People's Hospital from May 2004 to May 2008 were reviewed. Patients with CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter were enrolled in the >2 cm group. Two matched controls with CBD stones of <2 cm in diameter were selected for each enrolled patient (<2 cm group). Patient characteristics, success rates, and complications during and after ERCP were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients constituted the >2 cm group and 144 patients were in the <2 cm group. No significant differences were found in the patient characteristics, except for stone size and CBD diameter. Both the overall success rate and the success rate in the first ERCP session were lower in the >2 cm group (77.8% and 58.3%, respectively) than in the <2 cm group (91.7% and 83.3%, P<0.01). During ERCP, the incidence of hypoxemia (30.6%) and hemorrhaging papillae (18.1%) in the >2 cm group was higher than in the <2 cm group (13.2% and 6.3%, P<0.05). After ERCP, the rates of delayed papillae hemorrhage (13.9%), hyperamylasemia (23.6%), acute pancreatitis (8.3%) and biliary infection (18.1%) were higher in the >2 cm group than in the <2 cm group (3.5%, 11.1%, 2.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of endoscopic extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter was lower but the complication rate was higher than that of stones of <2 cm in diameter.

Clinical role of frequency-doubled double-pulsed yttrium aluminum garnet laser technology for removing difficult bile duct stones (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Very few clinical trials have reported on the success rate of frequency-doubled double-pulse yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser (FREDDY) technology for removal of difficult bile duct stones.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the role of FREDDY technology for removing difficult bile duct stones.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized, retrospective study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-two patients with difficult bile duct stones were treated via the transpapillary route by using a FREDDY system. The inclusion criteria were impacted or large common bile duct stones (>15 mm, mean 23.5 mm, range 15-35 mm, mean number of stones 1.7, range 1-4). Laser lithotripsy was performed with cholangioscopy guidance in 7 patients and fluoroscopic guidance alone in 45 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The success rate of complete stone removal and the complication rate related to the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients treated via the transpapillary route, complete stone removal was achieved in 48 patients (92.3%). The complete removal of stones required a mean of 1.4 (range 1-2) endoscopic sessions. The rate of complications related to laser lithotripsy was 23.0% (acute pancreatitis, 3 cases; transient hemobilia, 8 cases; acute cholangitis, 1 case).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized, retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Laser lithotripsy by using the FREDDY system seems safe and effective and allows "blind" fragmentation of bile duct stones under fluoroscopic guidance only.

Risk factors for symptomatic stone recurrence after transpapillary laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones using a laser with a stone recognition system

BACKGROUND

Laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL) is successfully used for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term risk for a symptomatic bile duct stone recurrence after LISL and to detect risk factors predicting recurrence.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2001, 80 patients with difficult bile duct stones were successfully treated by intracorporeal LISL through the papilla of Vater. Seventy-one of these patients [median age, 65.8 years; 51 women (71.8%)] were followed for a median (range) period of 58 (1-114) months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (15.5%) had a symptomatic stone recurrence. The median (range) period between laser lithotripsy and recurrence was 40 (5-85) months. The presence of a bile duct stenosis (P=0.032) and a body-mass index below 25 (P=0.025) were significantly associated with an increased risk for stone recurrence. A gallbladder in situ, the presence of gallbladder stones, dilation of the bile duct, or a peripapillary diverticulum was not associated with stone recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a bile duct stenosis is significantly related to bile duct stone recurrence after treatment with LISL. The impact of the body mass index on stone recurrence is interesting. The gallbladder status did not predict stone recurrence in our study.

Endoscopic Interventions in the Biliary Tract

In patients with common bile duct stones, the endoscopic removal of such stones has become the standard therapy. The surgical approach is indicated only for stones that cannot be extracted endoscopically. In biliary obstruction due to pancreaticobiliary malignancy, endoscopic interventions represent the first-line therapy in the palliative situation. If endoscopic access is not possible, the percutanous approach often represents an alternative, followed by palliative surgical options. Biliary strictures or bile leaks after liver transplantation very often may be treated effectively by endoscopic dilatation or temporary stenting. In most cases, endoscopic therapy of such problems represents the first option before the percutaneous or surgical approach is indicated. In primary sclerosing cholangitis, dominant biliary strictures develop frequently and endoscopic treatment allows their opening in most cases. There is no real alternative to endoscopy in this situation. The situation is more complex in postoperative biliary strictures and chronic pancreatitis. In these conditions, advantages and disadvantages of the endoscopic versus the surgical approach have to be evaluated to find the most effective form of treatment in the individual situation. The surgical intervention often represents the better alternative.

A review of technical and clinical aspects of biliary laser lithotripsy

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the current use of laser techniques for the treatment of biliary stones.

BACKGROUND DATA

Biliary stones may pose a special problem when access to them is limited, when previous attempts of removal have failed, or when a less invasive option than surgery is needed. The availability of various laser sources and the adaptation of the technology for safe use in the biliary system make the use of laser energy for stone fragmentation possible.

METHODS

Current literature is reviewed concerning the use of laser for biliary lithotripsy, including experimental data and experience with human series. Technology, indications, alternatives, and cumulative world experience are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent technical advances have made the use of laser energy for fragmentation of biliary calculi possible. It is a valid option for treatment of "difficult" stones, when other methods have failed or as a primary treatment in certain situations. The technical complexity and the high cost limit its use for specialized centers.

Clinical application of a new disposable lithotripter: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical lithotripsy has become a well-accepted method of bile duct stone fragmentation and removal. The Olympus lithotripter (Olympus American, Melville, NY) is the standard reusable lithotripter at the institutions that participated in this study. A disposable device with a preassembled pistol grip may perform equally well and facilitate operation.

METHODS

Twenty patients with bile duct stones were evaluated as part of a multicenter prospective study. Data were obtained regarding stone size and number, bile duct diameter, and configuration, ease of cannulation, basket function, stone capture and crushing success, and complications.

RESULTS

The maximum stone size averaged 16.5 +/- 1.2 mm (range 10 to 30 mm). Sixteen patients had multiple stones (median 5, range 2 to 12). The mean bile duct diameter was 20.5 +/- 1.5 mm (range 12 to 38 mm). Cannulation was successful in all within 5 attempts. Basket deployment failed in 1 patient because of stone size and the basket was misshapen in 14. Bile duct clearance was complete in 16 subjects (80%), incomplete in 2 patients, and failed in 2 patients. Abnormal duct configuration (sigmoid, stricture) was noted in 2 of 4 patients with failed capture and 7 of 16 patients with successful clearance. No statistically significant difference was observed between the bile duct diameter, maximum stone size, number of stones, and successful clearance.

CONCLUSION

The disposable lithotripter is easy to use and, compared with the published results for the reusable lithotripter, performs almost as well.

Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Mechanical lithotripsy for the management of difficult common bile duct stones has sometimes yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

A series of 162 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy was evaluated retrospectively and a large number of variables tested for their association with successful outcome.

RESULTS

The procedure was safe (morbidity rate 1.8 per cent) and effective (84.0 per cent stone clearance rate). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that stone size was the only outcome predictor (mean(s.d.) diameter of grasped versus non-grasped stones 21.7 (6.7) versus 28.3(10.4) mm; F = 10.72, 98 d.f., P = 0.002). The cumulative probability of bile duct clearance ranged from over 90 per cent for stones with a diameter less than 10 mm to 68 per cent for those greater than 28 mm in diameter (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients at high risk of lithotripsy failure (stone diameter of 28 mm or more) might more wisely undergo surgery or other non-surgical procedures, such as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or long-term biliary stenting.

Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Mechanical lithotripsy for the management of difficult common bile duct stones has sometimes yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

A series of 162 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy was evaluated retrospectively and a large number of variables tested for their association with successful outcome.

RESULTS

The procedure was safe (morbidity rate 1.8 per cent) and effective (84.0 per cent stone clearance rate). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that stone size was the only outcome predictor (mean(s.d.) diameter of grasped versus non-grasped stones 21.7 (6.7) versus 28.3(10.4) mm; F = 10.72, 98 d.f., P = 0.002). The cumulative probability of bile duct clearance ranged from over 90 per cent for stones with a diameter less than 10 mm to 68 per cent for those greater than 28 mm in diameter (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients at high risk of lithotripsy failure (stone diameter of 28 mm or more) might more wisely undergo surgery or other non-surgical procedures, such as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or long-term biliary stenting.

Laser lithotripsy of difficult biliary stones

From June 1991 to September 1992, 16 patients (mean age, 72 +/- 5 years) were treated with intra-corporeal laser lithotripsy (ICL). Thirteen patients had choledocholithiasis with at least one stone larger than 20 mm; 3 patients had intra-hepatic lithiasis. All other methods, including mechanical lithotripsy, extra-corporeal lithotripsy (1 case), and intra-corporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (1 case), had failed to clear the bile ducts. Approaches for ICL were choledochoscopy with a "baby" endoscope via an existing sphincterotomy (8 cases), retrograde cholangioscopy with a gastroscope through a choledochoduodenal anastomosis or a sphincterotomy in patients with a gastrojejunal anastomosis (5 cases), and trans-hepatic cholangioscopy with a fibercholangioscope (3 cases, in 1 of which retrograde and trans-hepatic approaches were combined). Free bile ducts were obtained in 14/16 (87.5%) patients after a mean of 1.66 ICL sessions per patient. Mortality and laser-related morbidity did not occur; endoscopy-related morbidity was 12.5% for minor complications (1 transitory fever, 1 mild and transitory hemobilia) and 6.25% for major complications (1 post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage). Mean length of hospital stay was 11.5 +/- 2.5 days. We conclude that although it is rarely indicated and is expensive, ICL does offer a limited treatment option in selected patients. It allows the complete relief of complex biliary lithiasis. Morbidity is related to maneuvers preceding ICL, not to ICL itself.

Lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary stones

Noninvasive or minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of biliary stones have been significantly advanced in the past two decades. The least invasive, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, continues to be used successfully, not only at its earliest reported site of use in Munich, Germany, but also in numerous other centers in the world. Lithotriptors that utilize a spark gap electrode or other sources of energy to generate sound waves and imaging by radiographic and ultrasonographic targeting of stones have proved to be effective in fragmenting biliary stones (90% to 95%) that are too large or otherwise inaccessible to removal by endoscopic papillotomy. Stone clearance (53% to 90%) may require successive treatments and the removal of debris by transendoscopic or surgical means. The mortality is low (0.5%), and the post-treatment course is relatively uncomplicated in an elderly, high-risk group of patients.

Non-surgical management of bile duct stones refractory to routine endoscopic measures

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and percutaneous approaches to the biliary tract have revolutionized the treatment of bile duct stones. Both the endoscopic and transhepatic approaches are less invasive than open surgery. This is an advantage for the mostly elderly and frail patients with common bile duct stones. Other patients with intrahepatic stones, e.g. young patients with oriental lithiasis, may also profit from the non-surgical approach. In this latter group it is often difficult for the surgeon to obtain access to the stone-bearing bile ducts. Due to the anatomical situation, size or impaction of stones the non-surgical approach, including mechanical disintegration, may primarily fail. Several techniques such as intracorporeal lithotripsy using electrohydraulic probes or laser light, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or direct contact dissolution are now available and often allow complete clearance of the bile ducts. If a kidney lithotripter with radiographic devices is available, it should be used after an attempt at mechanical lithotripsy has failed (Figure 1). According to the literature, experience with this method is greater than with any other 'third-step approach'. The procedure is simple, relatively safe and successful in approximately 80% of patients. However, in at least one third of patients, several sessions have to be performed and further endoscopy is frequently required for extraction of fragments. Intracorporeal techniques may become the procedure of choice in the future, at least in patients with common bile duct stones. At the moment, however, the different devices are still not fully developed and too susceptible to damage. A further major drawback, especially with high-energy electrohydraulic intracorporeal lithotripsy, is the danger of bile duct injury or even perforation, so that most procedures must be performed under optical control. The use of contact dissolution cannot generally be recommended. Treatment with mono-octanoin or modified mono-octanoin solvents takes too long, is often not successful and has a high rate of side-effects. MTBE may shorten the procedure considerably, but is suitable only for cholesterol stones, and the danger of spill-over into the intestine with absorption and systemic side-effects has to be weighed against the probability of success.

Choledocholithiasis treated by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid infusion through an endoscopic nasobiliary catheter

A 64 year old man was admitted to the National Cheng Kung University Hospital for obstructive jaundice. He had received cholecystectomy 5 years previously. Sonography revealed common bile duct stones. He was treated with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for 5 days for concomitant cholangitis. The muddy pigment stones disappeared completely after 10 days of infusion of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) via the ENBD tube. There were no adverse effects, and he was stone-free 4 months later.

Nonoperative management of bile duct stones

The treatment of choice for most retained bile duct stones is by nonoperative means. If a T-tube is in place, percutaneous techniques via the T-tract are indicated. Percutaneous access via puncture of a Roux-en-Y loop is also practical. In the absence of a T-tube, retrograde endoscopic techniques should be used. Both techniques are very effective and safe. Stones in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic ducts also can be treated nonoperatively. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has a role in the treatment of selected patients with gallstone pancreatitis, acute cholangitis, and choledocholithiasis with in situ gallbladders. In difficult cases, endoscopic and percutaneous techniques are employed in combination.

Endoscopic decompression for acute cholangitis due to stones

The prognosis in patients with acute cholangitis is poor, particularly when the cholangitis is 'severe' as defined by the presence of hypotension and/or confusion. This prospective study evaluates 16 elderly patients with acute cholangitis ('severe' in 11) due to stones in whom endoscopic biliary decompression was attempted. It was technically successful on 13 (81%) of the 16 occasions and the cholangitis rapidly resolved in these patients. In seven of 13, this was the definitive treatment while six underwent subsequent surgery consisting of: cholecystectomy or cholecystostomy (five) and secondary bile duct exploration (one). Two patients died following laparotomy for stones that were not amendable to endoscopic removal. Urgent endoscopic retrograde choledochography is recommended in elderly patients with acute cholangitis, because it confirms the diagnosis and allows decompression of the biliary tract by sphincterotomy. This stabilizes the patient's general condition and facilitates subsequent open surgery when required.

Lithotripsy for bile duct stones

Fragmentation of bile duct stones by mechanical, electrohydraulic, and laser intraluminal lithotripsy has greatly facilitated the ability to remove stones that are otherwise difficult to remove by standard manipulative techniques. Even these approaches fail when stones lack access or are impacted within the biliary tree. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated in the United States in a multicenter trial with 56 patients. Stone fragmentation occurred in 91 percent of patients and duct clearance in 79 percent. Adjunctive procedures were used in 54 percent. Two ESWL treatments were required for fragmentation in 28 percent. Complications were mild and relatively infrequent. Hemobilia (8 percent), gross hematuria (6 percent), and biliary sepsis (4 percent) occurred less frequently than expected. There were no deaths during the 1 to 31 days of hospitalization (mean 9 days). We conclude that ESWL is a safe and effective adjunct to the treatment of difficult-to-remove bile duct stones under the conditions observed in this trial.

Pathophysiology and treatment of gallstones

Spurred on by the discovery of "lithogenic bile" as a precursor, there has been much attention focused on the pathophysiology and treatment of gallstones. The article reviews the progress to date regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapy, and recurrence/prevention of gallstones.

Common duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis?

The relative indications for operative common duct exploration (CDE) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in treating common duct stones are often unclear. This prospective study compared CDE and ES in treating choledocholithiasis after excluding patients with acute cholecystitis, idiopathic pancreatitis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and malignant disease. One hundred and two patients had 105 CDE and a further 50 patients had 57 ES. Of the patients having CDE, 76 also had cholecystectomy for gall-bladder (GB) disease while 26 had prior cholecystectomy. With ES, in 16 the GB was present and not removed while 34 patients had had prior cholecystectomy. Hospitalization was significantly less following ES. There was one peri-operative death after CDE and none after ES. There were two late biliary-related deaths, 3 and 27 months after ES, in patients who developed acute cholecystitis. In post-cholecystectomy patients having ES, complications were fewer and less severe after ES (15%) than CDE (41%). In patients with an intact GB, peri-operative complications occurred in 30% after cholecystectomy and CDE. Following ES alone, complications occurred in 33% with the majority of these complications arising from the diseased GB. It is concluded that the optimal treatment for post-cholecystectomy patients with bile-duct stones is ES. In elderly patients with an intact GB, the bile-duct stones can be treated by ES; whether subsequent cholecystectomy is necessary should be assessed on the likelihood of future GB complications.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and the management of common bile-duct calculi

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the treatment of first choice for stones that remain in the bile duct after cholecystectomy. There is a small group of patients in whom this technique is not successful; many of these patients carry a high risk for surgery because of their age or associated medical conditions. A variety of non-surgical techniques is available; however, none is well established. We have used an in-vitro model to show that human gallstones are fragmented readily by shock-wave lithotripsy. Two elderly frail patients with difficult bile-duct stones have been treated successfully by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. The bile ducts were cleared of stones and the patients suffered no adverse effects. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy is a new and promising alternative to the current non-surgical techniques for the management of bile-duct stones.

Successful removal of a large stone from the common bile duct by endoscopic papillotomy and lithotripsy

A previously cholecystectomized man presented on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with a large stone (6×2×2 cm) in the common bile duct.

The patient refused surgical removal of the stone, so although endoscopic papillotomy was contrainicated, it was attempted. Herein is presented a case report of successful removal of a large stone by endoscopic papillotomy and lithotripsy with no significant complications.

Experience with percutaneous transhepatic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for retained stones in the biliary tract. Report on 15 patients

Residual choledochal stones in 11 patients and stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts in 5 patients were successfully removed by the use of the fiberoptic choledochoscope (FCH-6T), introduced percutaneously into the intrahepatic biliary tract. The reasons for the use of percutaneous transhepatic extraction were: (1) unsuccessful endoscopic papillotomy; (2) unsuccessful choledochoscopic removal via the T-tube tract; (3) high surgical risk; (4) the presence of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for acute cholangitis and acute pancreatitis. All stones were extracted through the liver or the papilla of Vater after crushing them. All minor complications such as pain, vomiting, or fever resolved without further therapy. Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy proved safe and effective for the removal of retained choledochal stones and was essential for the treatment of stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts.

Problems in endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy

Since 1976, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) has been done in 2,185 cases at Kwangju Christian Hospital in Kwangju, Korea, Between November 1981 and September 1986, endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy(EST) was performed on 194 patients. The results are as follows: 1) Common bile duct stones were found in 171 patients, ascaris in the common bile ducts of 12 patients, ascaris and stones in the common bile duct of 1 patient, clonorchis in the bile ducts of 4 patients, fibrotic stenosis of the periampullary choledochoduodenal fistula in 1 patient, stenosis of the common bile duct in 1 patient and stones in the pancreatic ducts of 4 patients. 2) In five cases the stones were extracted under direct vision, in 61 cases the stones were passed in the stool, while in 66 cases stone elimination was confirmed by repeated ERCP or T-tube cholangiography. In 46 cases the stones were not removed, but symptoms and laboratory findings showed marked improvement. 3) Complications following EST included 5 cases of bleeding, 1 case of acute pancreatitis with a pancreatic pseudocyst, one death due to sepsis following cholangitis, 5 cases of recurrent cholangitis and 2 cases of recurrent pancreatitis. 4) The conditions under which EST became difficult or did not succeed included periampullary diverticula, fibrotic stenosis of ampulla of Vater and stones in the intrahepatic ducts or a gallbladder. 5) With improved EST technical maneuverability, we could prevent bleeding and acute pancreatitis with a pancreatic pseudocyst and perform EST successfully in cases with periampullary diverticula.

Endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy: an analysis of 108 cases

Since 1976, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been done in 1,618 cases at Kwangju Christian Hospital in Kwangju, Korea. Between November 1981 and September 1984, endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (EST) was performed on 108 patients. The results are as follows: 1. Common bile duct stones were found in 98 of the patients (including 7 patients on whom T-tube cholangiography was done), ascaris in the common bile ducts of 6 of the patients, fibrotic stenosis of a periampullary choledochoduodenal fistula in 1 of the patients, and impacted stones in the ampulla of Vater in 3 of the patients (a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography was also done on these 3 patients). 2. In the case of 5 of the patients stones were extracted under direct vision, in the case of 39 of the patients stones passed in the stool, and in the case of 31 of the patients stone elimination was confirmed on repeated ERCP or T-tube cholangiography. In the case of 26 of the patients, small stones were removed, large stones remained and symptoms and laboratory findings showed improvement. 3. As complications after EST, bleeding developed in 4 patients, acute pancreatitis with a pancreatic pseudocyst developed in 1 patient, and another patient died of sepsis following cholangitis. 4. The overall success rate was 93.5%; morbidity rate, 5.6% and the mortality rate, 0.9%.