Complete regression of Barrett's esophagus with heat probe thermocoagulation: mid-term results

Cleavage of E-Cadherin Contributes to Defective Barrier Function in Neosquamous Epithelium

BACKGROUND

After ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE), the esophagus heals with neosquamous epithelium (NSE). Despite normal endoscopic appearance, NSE exhibits defective barrier function with similarities to defects noted in the distal esophageal epithelium in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To determine whether patients with NSE, unlike patients with healthy esophageal epithelium, have C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of e-cad detectable on tissue biopsy. Secondly, to determine whether patients with NSE have elevated levels of N-terminal fragments (NTFs) of e-cad in the serum.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with ablated long-segment BE, who had healing with formation of NSE, were enrolled in this pilot study. Western blots for CTFs and NTFs were performed on biopsies of NSE. Venous blood was obtained to assess levels of NTFs. Endoscopic distal esophageal biopsies from patients without esophageal disease served as tissue controls. Control blood samples were obtained from healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Blots of NSE were successful in 14/15 patients, and all 14 (100 %) had a 35-kD CTF of e-cad, while CTFs were absent in healthy control tissues. Despite CTFs in NSE, serum NTFs of e-cad in NSE were similar to controls, p > 0.05. However, unlike healthy controls, blots of NSE also showed NTFs with molecular weights of 70-90 kD.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleavage of e-cad, as evidenced by the presence of CTFs and NTFs on biopsy, contributes to defective barrier function in NSE. However, unlike findings reported in GERD patients, serum NTFs are not elevated in NSE patients. This difference may reflect poor absorption with tissue entrapment of NTFs in previously ablated areas with poorly perfused NSE.

Chemoprevention in Barrett's oesophagus

Increasing incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma along with poor survival entails novel preventive strategies. Agents that target pro-oncogenic pathways in Barrett's mucosa could halt this neoplastic transformation. In this review, we will use epidemiological associations and molecular mechanisms to identify novel chemoprevention targets in Barrett's oesophagus. We will also discuss recent chemoprevention trials.

How good is the neosquamous epithelium?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) combined with proton pump inhibitor therapy is commonly utilized for preventing progression of dysplastic BE to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Fundamental to the success of this and all ablative approaches is the healing of the ablated areas of BE with a stratified squamous epithelium referred to as 'neosquamous epithelium' (NSE). Although NSE appears 'normal' endoscopically, the reemergence of BE over time in the previously ablated segments raises the question of the health and integrity of NSE.

METHODS

The health of NSE was recently investigated in endoscopic biopsies in vitro in a group of patients after ablation while on proton pump inhibitors. Biopsies of NSE were compared to upper squamous epithelium (USE) from the same patients morphologically (light microscopy) and with respect to barrier function by measuring electrical resistance and fluorescein flux in mini-Ussing chambers.

RESULTS

Compared to USE, NSE exhibited dilated intercellular spaces and inflammation and defective barrier function by low electrical resistance and high fluorescein flux. Moreover, NSE exhibited downregulation of claudin-4, a highly expressed protein in squamous tight junctions.

CONCLUSION

NSE has defective barrier function in part due to downregulation of claudin-4. Since downregulation of claudin-4 increases paracellular permeability to cations, e.g. hydrogen ions, NSE is more vulnerable to attack and damage by acidic and weakly acidic refluxates--a phenomenon that may contribute in part to the reemergence of BE.

Endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness compared to esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Recently, several new endoscopic treatments have been used to treat patients with Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia. This systematic review aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of these treatments compared with esophagectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify studies of endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus or early stage esophageal cancer. Information from the selected studies was extracted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was assessed and information was tabulated to identify trends or patterns. Results were pooled across studies for each outcome. Safety (occurrence of adverse events) and effectiveness (complete eradication of dysplasia) were compared across different treatments.

RESULTS

The 101 studies that met the selection criteria included 8 endoscopic techniques and esophagectomy; only 12 were comparative studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. Methods and outcomes were inconsistently reported. Protocols, outcomes measured, follow-up times and numbers of treatment sessions varied, making it difficult to calculate pooled estimates.The surgical mortality rate was 1.2%, compared to 0.04% in 2831 patients treated endoscopically (1 death). Adverse events were more severe and frequent with esophagectomy, and included anastomotic leaks (9.4%), wound infections (4.1%) and pulmonary complications (4.1%). Four patients (0.1%) treated endoscopically experienced bleeding requiring transfusions. The stricture rate with esophagectomy (5.3%) was lower than with porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (18.5%), but higher than aminolevulinic acid (ALA) 60 mg/kg PDT (1.4%). Dysphagia and odynophagia varied in frequency across modalities, with the highest rates reported for multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC). Photosensitivity, an adverse event that occurs only with photodynamic therapy, was experienced by 26.4% of patients who received porfimer sodium.Some radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or argon plasma coagulation (APC) studies (used in multiple sessions) reported rates of almost 100% for complete eradication of dysplasia. But the study methods and findings were not adequately described. The other studies of endoscopic treatments reported similarly high rates of complete eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatments offer safe and effective alternatives to esophagectomy for patients with Barrett's esophagus and high grade dysplasia. Unfortunately, shortcomings in the published studies make it impossible to determine the comparative effectiveness of each of the endoscopic treatments.

Prevalence and predictors of recurrent neoplasia after ablation of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The incidence and risk factors for recurrence of dysplasia after ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) have not been well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate and predictors of dysplasia/neoplasia recurrence after photodynamic therapy (PDT) in BE.

SETTING

Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of BE patients seen at a specialized BE unit.

METHODS

Patients underwent a standard protocol assessment with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 4-quadrant biopsies every centimeter at 3-month intervals after ablation. Recurrence was defined as the appearance of any grade of dysplasia or neoplasia after 2 consecutive endoscopies without dysplasia. Entry histology, demographics, length of BE, presence and length of diaphragmatic hernia, EMR, stricture formation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, smoking, and the presence of nondysplastic BE or squamous epithelium were assessed for univariate associations. Time-to-recurrence analysis was done by using Cox proportional hazards regression. A multivariate model was constructed to establish independent associations with recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients underwent PDT with or without EMR. Of these, 261 patients were included in the final analysis (44 lost to follow-up, 46 had residual dysplasia, and 12 had no dysplasia at baseline). Indication for ablation was low-grade dysplasia (53 patients, 20%), high-grade dysplasia (152 patients, 58%), and intramucosal cancer (56 patients, 21%). Median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range 18-79 months). Recurrence occurred in 45 patients. Median time to recurrence was 17 months (interquartile range 8-45 months). Significant predictors of recurrence on the multivariate model were older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, P=.029), presence of residual nondysplastic BE (HR 2.88, P=.012), and a history of smoking (HR 2.68, P=.048).

LIMITATIONS

Possibility of missing prevalent dysplasia despite aggressive surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of dysplasia/neoplasia after PDT ablation is associated with advanced age, smoking, and residual BE.

Barrett's esophagus: pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most common type of esophageal cancer seen in the United States and Western Europe. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well-known risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma and is believed to be found in 6% to 12% of patients undergoing endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease and in more than 1% of all patients undergoing endoscopy. This article focuses on the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of BE.

Abnormal expression of biomarkers in incompletely ablated Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate expression of cancer risk-associated biomarkers in columnar epithelium at squamocolumnar junctions produced by an ablation procedure and proton pump inhibitors in incompletely ablated Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients that were nondysplastic prior to ablation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Ablation of BE to squamous epithelium is achievable by combining a re-injury method with acid suppression. We previously reported that, when there is complete ablation, the neo-squamous epithelium is normal histologically and in biomarker expression. However, squamous islands observed after prolonged use of PPIs were associated with abnormalities in p53 expression and Ki-67 labeling.

METHODS

Twenty-one nondysplastic BE cases with incomplete ablation were evaluated for the expression of Ki-67 (proliferation), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and p53 by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Pre-ablation biopsies showed the normal staining patterns in columnar epithelium, ie, normal Ki-67 labeling, rare positive COX-2 staining of interstitial cells, and negative or mild staining for p53 in the majority of patients' biopsies. However, post-ablation biopsies demonstrated abnormal staining patterns in the glandular area at the new squamocolumnar junctions. In 13 of 21 post-ablation cases (62%), increased Ki-67 staining was seen in BE glands. In 8 of 21 patients (38%), increased COX-2 expression was seen in columnar epithelium. Similarly, in 8 of 21 post-ablation junctions (38%), there was increased p53 staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings of increased expression of cancer-associated biomarkers in incompletely ablated BE patients raise a cautionary note regarding this procedure. We hypothesize that newly formed junctions contain cells undergoing replication, differentiation, etc, and are thus more susceptible to genomic damage.

Endoluminal therapy for Barrett's esophagus

This article reviews methods to minimize the complications associated with endoscopic therapy for patients with Barrett's esophagus. To place this discussion in context, the natural history of Barrett's esophagus and the risks associated with progression to dysplasia and invasive carcinoma are reviewed. Operative esophageal resection traditionally is recommended for patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and early carcinoma, and these surgical risks also are reviewed. Finally, all currently approved and commercially available methods for endoscopic ablation and resection of Barrett's disease are categorized according to their application methods of ablation: focal ablation, field ablation, and mucosal resection. The clinical experience with these devices is reviewed with their associated adverse events and complications. Caveats, concerns, and recommendations are discussed to help minimize the complications associated with the use of these important technologies that hold the promise of removing or destroying Barrett's disease to prevent the development of invasive carcinoma.

Technology Insight: ablative techniques for Barrett's esophagus—current and emerging trends

New mucosal ablative techniques that can be used in the esophagus have emerged over the past two decades. These techniques have been developed primarily to treat the precursors of esophageal adenocarcinoma: dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal cancer. Although high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer can be treated with esophagectomy, the inherent morbidity and mortality of esophageal adenocarcinoma and the morbidities, difficulties, costs and limitations of the current technology mean that there has been a significant increase in interest and research regarding alternative treatments such as ablative techniques. At this stage it is not clear which of the numerous endoscopic ablative techniques available-photodynamic therapy, laser therapy, multipolar electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy-will emerge as superior. In addition, it has yet to be determined whether the risks associated with ablation therapy are less than the risk of Barrett's esophagus progressing to cancer. Whether ablation therapy eliminates or significantly reduces the risk of cancer, eliminates the need for surveillance endoscopy, or is cost-effective, also remains to be seen. Comparative trials that are now underway should help to answer these questions.

Visible endoscopic and histologic changes in the cardia, before and after complete Barrett's esophagus ablation

BACKGROUND

Adverse events associated with the thermal ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) include the generation of gastric mucosa buried beneath the neosquamous regrowth, and unrecognized development and growth of adenocarcinomas. No reports exist regarding the endoscopic appearance and histology of the cardia before and after BE ablation. The aim of our study was to assess the relative frequency of the occurrence of visible endoscopic and histologic changes in the cardia, before and after complete BE ablation.

METHODS

A subset analysis of patients with uncomplicated BE, BE with dysplasia, or early carcinoma, who had been enrolled into one of 4 ongoing prospective studies of mucosal ablation, was examined. Eighty-two patients were identified who entered a BE ablation study, with 75 of these completing BE mucosal ablation. Cardia biopsy specimens were taken in all patients before ablation and serially after BE ablation. Cardia histology was graded by using the modified Sydney System for gastritis.

RESULTS

Before ablation, cardia nodules were noted in 3, cardia intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 7 (8.5%), and none harbored cardia dysplasia. Postablation surveillance ranged from 3 to 75 months (mean 31.1 months [19.5]). Six subjects (8%) developed cardia nodules during surveillance; cardia IM was found in 21(28%), with 17 of these being a new finding (incidence of 25%). Cardia low-grade dysplasia incidence was 1.3% and high-grade dysplasia was 4% after BE ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathophysiology of the abnormal cardia histology and the endoscopic lesions (nodules) is unclear, but endoscopic surveillance of not only the neosquamous epithelium but also the cardia should be considered after ablation, especially in those high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma BE patients.

Prevention of adenocarcinoma by reversing Barrett's esophagus with mucosal ablation

The ultimate goal of therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) is to reduce the risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Neither pharmacologic nor surgical therapy has been documented to reduce this risk. There is preliminary evidence that many forms of mucosal ablation combined with acid reduction therapy result in restitution of normal squamous epithelium in patients with BE. Acid reduction can be accomplished with high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy or antireflux surgery. Endoscopic ablation can be accomplished with photodynamic therapy, laser, multipolar electrocoagulation, a heater probe, and argon plasma coagulation. These techniques require further study so the complication rates can be compared. The success of reversing BE must be evaluated in a standard way utilizing large-capacity biopsy forceps through a therapeutic endoscope. Ideally, patients at high risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the esophagus can be treated with ablation therapy and followed to document a reduction in the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. A validated biomarker would help select high risk patients appropriate for reversal therapy. Currently, patients who are at prohibitive risk for surgery or who refuse surgery are candidates for combination therapy including mucosal ablation to reverse their BE. This therapy offers the promise of less morbidity and greater quality of life than resection.

Mucosal ablation in Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a prevalent, premalignant condition affecting the gastroesophageal junction and distal esophagus. Ablation plus antireflux therapy has recently been advocated to prevent the development of adenocarcinoma or to treat those unfit or unwilling to undergo esophagectomy. The present article, based on a search of Medline/ISI databases and cross-referencing of relevant articles, reviews the literature on this subject. A number of techniques have been used to remove the affected mucosa, including laser, electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy but, as yet, none has been shown to be superior. Depending on the method used, ablation results in complete removal of Barrett's esophagus in approximately one third of patients and a partial response in nearly two-thirds. The resultant squamous mucosa is apparently 'normal' but may regress. To promote and maintain regeneration, antireflux therapy must be sufficient to reduce repetitive injury to the esophageal mucosa. Whether ablation reduces the cancer risk or delays its occurrence is unknown, though recent data suggests benefit. Complications are infrequent and usually mild. Regular follow-up endoscopy and deep biopsies continue to be necessary. Careful data from much larger populations with long-term follow-up is required before ablation reaches the stage of broad clinical application.

Ablation of Barrett's epithelium: the promise and the problems

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus has increased dramatically over recent years. Because Barrett's epithelium is recognized as a risk factor for adenocarcinoma there is an interest in reversing this metaplasia. A number of endoscopic methods of destruction of esophageal columnar epithelium have been described. The purpose of this article is to review the currently available methods of managing Barrett's epithelium with particular reference to the role of ablative therapy in reducing the risk of adenocarcinoma.

Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is an acquired condition resulting from severe esophageal mucosal injury. It still remains unclear why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease develop Barrett's esophagus whereas others do not. The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus is established if the squamocolumnar junction is displaced proximal to the gastroesophageal junction and if intestinal metaplasia is detected by biopsy. Despite this seemingly simple definition, diagnostic inconsistencies remain a problem, especially in distinguishing short segment Barrett's esophagus from intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia. Barrett's esophagus would be of little importance were it not for its well-recognized association with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to increase and the 5-year survival rate for this cancer remains dismal. However, cancer risk for a given patient with Barrett's esophagus is lower than previously estimated. Current strategies for improved survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma focus on cancer detection at an early and potentially curable stage. This can be accomplished either by screening more patients for Barrett's esophagus or with endoscopic surveillance of patients with known Barrett's esophagus. Current screening and surveillance strategies are inherently expensive and inefficient. New techniques to improve the efficiency of cancer surveillance are evolving rapidly and hold the promise to change clinical practice in the future. Treatment options include aggressive acid suppression, antireflux surgery, chemoprevention, and ablation therapy, but there is still no clear consensus on the optimal treatment for these patients.

Effective and safe endoscopic reversal of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus with thermal electrocoagulation combined with high-dose acid inhibition: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus is a metaplastic change in the esophageal lining with an increased risk for adenocarcinoma. Multiple endoscopic techniques have been applied in an effort to reverse Barrett's. This is a multicenter trial defining the efficacy and safety of multipolar electrocoagulation combined with high-dose acid inhibition.

METHODS

Patients with a 2- to 6-cm segment of Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia were enrolled at 3 centers. They were treated with omeprazole 40 mg twice daily and then with up to 6 sessions with electrocoagulation aimed at eliminating all the endoscopically apparent Barrett's. Four quadrant large-capacity biopsies every 2 cm were centrally assessed for residual intestinal metaplasia.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients reached the endpoint of failure of visual reversal of Barrett's after 6 treatment sessions or a 6-month follow-up after the last session. Eighty-five percent had visual reversal and 78% both visual and histologic reversal. Four patients had histologic evidence of residual intestinal metaplasia. Transient esophageal symptoms were common. One patient developed a stricture requiring dilation and one required overnight hospitalization for chest pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with 2 to 6 cm of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus can be safely reversed with this combination therapy. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to document the durability of the new squamous epithelium.

Mucosal ablation therapy of barrett esophagus

Barrett esophagus is defined by the metaplasia of existing squamous mucosa into a specialized intestinal-type mucosa. The importance of this metaplasia is the association of this condition with the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Elimination of the metaplastic mucosa may decrease the cancer risk. Currently, several forms of therapy have evolved with the goal of replacing the specialized mucosa with normal squamous mucosa. These proposed treatments include photodynamic therapy and thermal techniques. The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy varies depending on the pharmaceutical photosensitizer used and the wavelength of light applied to activate the drug. Thermal techniques include multipolar coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, KTP:YAG laser therapy, Nd:YAG laser therapy, and argon laser therapy. Finally, mucosal resection has been attempted through the endoscope to remove large areas of the Barrett mucosa. All of these ablative strategies attempt to destroy the metaplastic mucosa and promote the regrowth of squamous epithelium. These therapies have demonstrated the ability to "reverse" the metaplasia to varying degrees, but a decrease in cancer risk has not been demonstrated conclusively with any of these treatment methods.

New treatment for Barrett's oesophagus

Barrett's esophagus is characterised by the presence of specialised intestinal metaplasia in the lower esophagus. Its importance is related primarily to its link with adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, often preceded by dysplastic changes. The incidence of this carcinoma has increased dramatically over the last few decades. Although modern treatments, particularly acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors, have been most useful in controlling the reflux symptoms associated with Barrett's esophagus, they have not reduced the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The same can be said about anti-reflux surgery. Surgical excision of Barrett's esophagus has been advocated when high-grade dysplasia is detected; this carries considerable morbidity and mortality, so alternative treatments are being developed. This update summarises recent information concerning newer treatments aimed at eradicating Barrett's esophagus. These vary from thermal coagulation (using electrocoagulation and heater probes) to lasers, photodynamic therapy and mechanical methods. Of these, photodynamic therapy using a porphyrin precursor (5-amino-laevulinic acid) seems to give the most consistent satisfactory results with a minimum of complications. However, persistence of some metaplastic cells beneath the neo-squamous layer remains a problem. Ongoing effective acid control (by medical or surgical therapy) is also essential to prevent recurrence of Barrett's esophagus. Future research is aimed at perfecting these methods. Ultimately, it may be possible to understand the molecular biology which could help to predict which patients are at greatest risk of developing dysplastic and carcinomatous changes.

High power setting argon plasma coagulation for the eradication of Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

The term Barrett's esophagus refers to a premalignant condition that is characterized by the replacement of the esophageal squamous mucosa by a columnar-lined one. Preliminary studies have demonstrated reversal of Barrett's mucosa after endoscopic coagulation with different techniques associated with acid inhibition. However, most of these studies have shown that residual Barrett's glands are found underneath the new squamous epithelium in up to 40% of patients. The goal of our study is to verify whether complete restoration of Barrett's mucosa can be achieved by the combination of high power setting argon plasma coagulation and omeprazole.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients (mean age: 55.2 yr, range: 21-84 yr; 21 men and 12 women) with histologically demonstrated Barrett's esophagus (mean length: 4.05 cm, range: 0.5-7 cm) were treated. Fourteen cases presented with low-grade dysplasia and one with high-grade dysplasia. All of the extent, or until a maximum of 4 cm, of the Barrett's mucosa was cauterized in each session using argon beam coagulation at a power setting of 65-70 W. All patients received 60 mg omeprazole during the treatment period.

RESULTS

Complete restoration of squamous mucosa was obtained in all 33 cases after a mean of 1.96 sessions (range, 1-4). Endoscopic results were histologically confirmed. Nineteen (57.5%) patients experienced moderate to severe chest pain and odyno-dysphagia lasting for 3-10 days after the procedure. Five of these cases experienced high fever and a small volume of pleural effusion, and three patients developed esophageal strictures that needed to be dilated. Another patient developed pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema without evidences of perforation. After a mean follow-up of 10.6 months there was one endoscopic, as well as histological, recurrence of Barrett's mucosa in a patient with an ineffective laparoscopic fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS

High power setting argon plasma coagulation combined with intensive acid suppression is an effective treatment for the total endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus, at least in the short term. Long-term follow-up of treated patients in whom gastroesophageal reflux is surgically or medically alleviated seems mandatory before drawing definitive conclusions about this therapy.

Barrett esophagus

Barrett esophagus continues to intrigue investigators and clinicians alike as the new millennium begins. A large number of publications in the past year have discussed issues of epidemiology, prevalence, detection, and treatment of Barrett esophagus. Chronic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were identified as a strong risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The relative frequency of short and long Barrett and cardia intestinal metaplasia in patients who undergo upper endoscopy have been better defined. Biomarkers in patients with Barrett may eventually be helpful in identifying those at high risk for the development of neoplasia. High-dose proton pump inhibition to the point of near elimination of esophageal acid exposure remains disappointing in its impact on the surface area of Barrett. Finally, the developments in endoscopic therapy for patients with Barrett esophagus continue to be promising.

Endoscopic therapeutic esophageal interventions

At the close of the 20th century, therapeutic endoscopy in the esophagus has expanded to encompass a broad array of interventions. As the number of procedures grows, emphasis in the medical literature has begun to shift to analyses of which procedures should be performed. Many studies published in 1999 on topics ranging from endoscopic treatment of benign and malignant strictures, to variceal bleeding, to Barrett esophagus have focused on which of several methods provides the best long-term response with the fewest interventions. This is a review of the major published studies of endoscopic interventions in the esophagus as well as selected abstracts. The conclusions of these studies and reports of new endoscopic therapies draw a clear map of where nonoperative esophageal therapeutics are headed in the next several years.