Benefits of hardware removal after plating

Removing hardware from anterior approaches following acetabular fractures: a challenging yet indicated procedure

PURPOSE

To describe the indications, outcomes, and incidence of complications after hardware removal from anterior approaches following acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS

Over ten years, 13 patients were included, complaining of pain due to late infection in nine (69.2%) and secondary osteoarthritis in four (30.8%). Fractures classification were T-type fracture (46.2%), both columns (38.5%), one transverse (7.7%), and one (7.7%) T-type with a posterior wall. The approaches utilized for hardware removal were modified Stoppa in 11 (84.6%) patients, ilioinguinal lateral (iliac) window in nine (69.2%), Pararectus in one (7.7%), ilioinguinal in one (7.7%), and Kocher-Langenbeck approach in one (7.7%)).

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 37.1 ± 14.9 (21 to 65) years, and nine (69.2%) were males. Hardware removal was performed after the index surgery by a mean of 35.6 ± 20 months. The mean operative time was 143.8 ± 36 min, and the mean blood loss was 1573 ± 842 CC. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 ± 2.3 days, and all patients required blood transfusion. Four (30.8%) intraoperative complications, two (15.4%) vascular injuries, One (7.7%) urinary bladder injury, and in two (15.4%) broken screws could not be retrieved. Postoperative complications in five (38.5%): three (23.1%) had superficial wound infection, one (7.7%) had DVT, and one (7.7%) had L5 nerve root injury. After a mean follow up of 11.3 ± 4.4 (6 to 20) months, the VAS score decreased from a preoperative median of 6 (2 to 8) to a median score of 1 (0 to 6) at the last follow up. 11 (84.6%) patients described the pain as none or occasional, and eight (61.5%) were very satisfied with the results.

CONCLUSION

Hardware removal from the anterior approaches after acetabular fractures is demanding and carries a high complication risk. The surgeries should be performed when highly indicated, and the surgical team must be familiar with the anterior approaches.

Risk factors for complications following volar locking plate fixation of distal radial fractures

INTRODUCTION

With the aging population comes an increase in the number of distal radial fractures and therefore in the number of cases requiring volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. The complication rates after VLP fixation vary greatly from one study to the next. Several authors have already focused on these complications and how to lower their rate. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for complications after VLP fixation of distal radial fractures that lead to implant removal.

HYPOTHESIS

Implant removal (except systematic removal) after VLP fixation can be predicted by risk factors for complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 2951 patients included in the study and divided into two groups: fixation without implant removal and fixation with implant removal. Then, intrinsic factors (age, sex, dominant side, tilt, type of fracture based on the AO classification (extra-articular - partial articular - complete articular - fracture); as well as one extrinsic factor (plate position according to the Soong classification compared to the watershed line) were identified. For all these factors, the relative risk (RR) was computed using univariate and multivariate models. The risk factors that reached statistical significance (p < 0.02) were used in the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The univariate and multivariate analyses identified three risk factors for complications, i.e. implant removal: being under 62 years of age (RR = 1.99; CI 1.56-2.54, p < 0.0001), type 2R3C fracture according to the AO classification (RR = 1.50; CI 1.17-1.93, p = 0.0050) and Soong grade 2 plate position (RR = 1.73; 1.32-2.26, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that plate position recorded as grade 2 was a risk factor for complications and therefore implant removal. This is an extrinsic factor that is implant and surgeon dependent. Moreover, intrinsic factors were also identified such as age and type of fracture. Assessing these risk factors after VLP fixation of distal radial fractures may lead to early detection of these complications and an opportunity to propose implant removal as a preventive measure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ultrasound guidance in the surgical removal of internal fixators after complete healing of limb fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether ultrasound guidance can reduce the duration, blood loss volume and invasiveness of surgery for internal fixator removal.

METHODS

The clinical data from 35 adults patients who underwent ultrasound-guided surgical removal of internal fixators after complete healing of limb fractures between June 2019 and April 2023 were retrospectively analysed and compared with those from 34 controls who underwent the procedure without ultrasound guidance. Data concerning the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and surgical sites were collected. Differences in the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical removal of internal fixators with ultrasound guidance, and the average intraoperative blood loss volume was 15.17 ± 18.54 ml, average difference between the incision length and scar length was 4.24 ± 1.38 cm, average operation time was 60.66 ± 24.30 min, and average ultrasound assessment time was 10.00 ± 3.90 min. Thirty-four patients underwent surgical removal of internal fixators without ultrasound guidance, and the average blood loss volume was 46.76 ± 90.74 ml, average difference between the incision length and scar length was 2.68 ± 1.04 cm, and average operation time was 80.15 ± 58.84 min. The difference between the incision length and scar length was significant (P < 0.01), as was the difference in the intraoperative blood loss volume (P < 0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is a convenient, noninvasive, radiation-free technique that allows dynamic scanning of multiple sections regardless of patient position. Ultrasound-assisted removal of internal fixators might reduce bleeding and therefore the invasiveness of the procedure. Physicians can use ultrasound for preoperative patient positioning, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative confirmation of complete removal of internal fixators if necessary.

Epidemiology of complications after non-compulsory planned hardware-removal after limbs fracture

INTRODUCTION

Removal of hardware (HR) following a fracture is a frequent question from patients. The incidence of this kind of intervention remains very variable depending on the healthcare systems and its interest is debated in view of the benefits and associated risks that remain poorly defined. Mandatory preoperative information cannot be given optimally in this context.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of complications (major and minor) after non-compulsory planned hardware-removal following a limb fracture.

HYPOTHESIS

The rate of major complications was greater than 1%.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective single-center study included 1990 patients who had undergone routine HR. Analysis of medical records, with a minimum of one year of follow-up, allowed us to collect: patient data, the type and anatomical location of the osteosynthesis material, as well as the occurrence of a postoperative complication, categorized as a major complication (resulting in either a new surgical procedure, re-hospitalization, or lasting functional impairment) or a minor complication.

RESULTS

Overall, 4.1% (79/1990) of patients experienced postoperative complications, including 1.56% (31/1990) major complications and 21 surgical revisions (1.06%). The time to onset of complications was 9.1 +/- 8.4 days. The most common complications were deep infections and impaired skin healing with superficial infection (55/79, 69.6%). Locations "around the knee" and "around the ankle" were at higher risk of complications (p < 0.01). Smoking was identified as a significant risk factor for complications, particularly deep infection (p = 0.004, OR = 8.7 [1.98; 38.11]).

DISCUSSION

Non-mandatory routine RH has a significant complication rate even in a healthy population. Preoperative information of the patient and the assessment of the benefit/risk balance are essential in this indication. This study also raises the question of mandatory smoking cessation preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Worrying Presence of Asymptomatic Bacterial Colonisation on Implanted Orthopedic Devices

Background Bacterial infection after hardware implantation in orthopedic and trauma surgery is devastating, resulting in increased hospital costs and stays, multiple revision surgeries, and prolonged use of antibiotics. The present study aims to determine whether a symbiotic relationship between the human organism and bacteria in hardware implantation may be present, without clinically evident infection. Materials and methods We studied explanted devices for microbiological analysis, using the sonication technique, from patients who underwent surgical removal of musculoskeletal hardware for mechanical reasons. None of the patients included in the study had clinical or biochemical signs of infection. Results Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Cultures tested positive for bacteria in 42.8% of the 49 patients (21 of 49). In 13 patients, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated, while Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from nine patients. The most frequent bacterial species found was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with six positive cultures (28.5%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated from ten implants (47%). Conclusion A pacific coexistence between humans and bacteria is possible following the implantation of metallic devices for trauma or orthopedic ailments. It is still unclear how strong or unstable this equilibrium is.

Percutaneous removal of hardware after orthopedic surgery: Is it safe? and What are patients saying?

OBJECTIVES

To analyze our patient's complication profile and rate after removal of hardware (ROH) surgery, and survey our patients to ask their overall status and improvement in symptomatology post-operatively.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and survey.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

173 patients with 314 pieces of hardware. Seventy-six patients (43.9%) responded to our survey.

INTERVENTION

ROH surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patient demographics and complications were recorded. All patients were sent a brief 3-question survey which asked: (1) Why did you get your hardware removed? (2) How did your overall status change after ROH? (3) How did the ROH affect your stiffness, pain, swelling, and mobility?

RESULTS

There were 10 complications (5.5%): 5 infections, 2 with unresolved pain, 1 hematoma, 1 chronic regional pain syndrome exacerbation, and 1 recurrent deformity. All infections were treated with oral antibiotics and improved. All other complications resolved with treatment except for the patient who developed recurrent deformity. Patients underwent ROH surgery because their doctor suggested it (76.3%) and to improve mobility (39.5%). 86.9% reported their overall status improved after ROH. They improved regarding stiffness (73.7%), pain (73.6%), swelling (61.8%), and mobility (76.3%). Similar results were seen among different implants removed.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who underwent percutaneous ROH were satisfied. They reported improvement in stiffness, pain, swelling and mobility (greatest improvement). The complication rate was low (5.5%). ROH can be a meaningful operation to patients allowing them to improve their quality of life with a low complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Microbial Colonization of Explants after Osteosynthesis in Small Animals: Incidence and Influencing Factors

Despite recent advancements in antibiotics, hygienic measures, and peri-operative systemic antibiotics, post-operative infections in osteosynthesis remain prevalent and continue to be among the most common surgical complications, leading to delayed fracture healing, osteomyelitis, implant loosening, and loss of function. Osteosynthesis implants are routinely utilized in veterinary medicine and the current study investigates the microbial colonization of implants following osteosynthesis in small animals, along with its incidence and influencing factors. The results are analyzed in regard to correlations between infection, patient, disease progression, and radiographic images, as well as other factors that may promote infection. Seventy-one explants from sixty-five patients were examined and evaluated for microbial colonization. Factors like body weight and age, location and type of plate and additional injuries like lung lesions, the surgeon's experience, or the number of people present during the surgical procedure seem to influence the development of an infection. Of the animals, 60% showed osteolytic changes and 73.3% of those with dysfunctional mobility had an implant infection. Microorganisms were detected in almost 50% of the explants, but a clinically relevant infection was only present in five patients (7.3%), suggesting that the presence of microorganisms on an implant does not necessarily lead to treatment complications.

The biointegration profile of fiber-reinforced plates following tibial implantation in sheep

Biointegrative, mineral fiber-reinforced bone fixation implants recently introduced in orthopedic surgery have expanded available treatment options for fractures and bone deformities. This new technology aims to address the disadvantages of permanent metallic implants while overcoming inherent concerns of adverse inflammatory reactions when using polymer-based orthopedic implants. The purpose of this double-arm preclinical study was to evaluate the safety, biocompatibility, and biointegration of fiber-reinforced plates, following implantation on the tibias of eight sheep. Left tibias underwent periosteal elevation, allowing for implant attachment directly onto the cortical surface; right tibia plates were implanted over intact periosteum. Microcomputed tomography and histopathology were performed at 13, 26, 52, 78, 104, and 134 weeks postimplantation. All animals were evaluated clinically at each time point, with no evidence of local adverse reactions. Histopathology demonstrated anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages and multinucleated giant cells corresponding to implant bioabsorption, similar for both groups at each time point, and indicating expected implant biocompatibility. Inflammatory cells (i.e., eosinophils, lymphophyctes, plasma cells, and M1-like macrophages) were absent throughout the study. The bioabsorption process had started at 13 W, with the highest rate at 52-78 W. At 104 W, only residual polymer material was left (∼5% of implant area). Low amounts of mineral fibers were evident at 78 W and were absent (fully remodeled) by 104 W. At 134 W, implants at both sites were fully bioabsorbed. In conclusion, these new fiber-reinforced implants demonstrated bone remodeling and complete biointegration, with no adverse tissue response. Clinical significance: In this double-arm, 2.5-year study, a biointegrative, fiber-reinforced plate implanted on the tibias of sheep was fully absorbed within 134 weeks, with no adverse tissue reaction. Bioabsorption was similar, with or without periosteal elevation, mimicking conditions like those observed in traumatic injuries disrupting the periosteum, open reduction and internal fixation, or minimally invasive surgeries. These results demonstrate the feasibility, versatility, and safety of this new class of biointegrative bone implants. This newly developed technology avoids the complications of the removal of metal implants.

The role of stiffness-matching in avoiding stress shielding-induced bone loss and stress concentration-induced skeletal reconstruction device failure

It is well documented that overly stiff skeletal replacement and fixation devices may fail and require revision surgery. Recent attempts to better support healing and sustain healed bone have looked at stiffness-matching of these devices to the desired role of limiting the stress on fractured or engrafted bone to compressive loads and, after the reconstructed bone has healed, to ensure that reconstructive medical devices (implants) interrupt the normal loading pattern as little as possible. The mechanical performance of these devices can be optimized by adjusting their location, integration/fastening, material(s), geometry (external and internal), and surface properties. This review highlights recent research that focuses on the optimal design of skeletal reconstruction devices to perform during and after healing as the mechanical regime changes. Previous studies have considered auxetic materials, homogeneous or gradient (i.e., adaptive) porosity, surface modification to enhance device/bone integration, and choosing the device's attachment location to ensure good osseointegration and resilient load transduction. By combining some or all of these factors, device designers work hard to avoid problems brought about by unsustainable stress shielding or stress concentrations as a means of creating sustainable stress-strain relationships that best repair and sustain a surgically reconstructed skeletal site. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Although standard-of-care skeletal reconstruction devices will usually allow normal healing and improved comfort for the patient during normal activities, there may be significant disadvantages during long-term use. Stress shielding and stress concentration are amongst the most common causes of failure of a metallic device. This review highlights recent developments in devices for skeletal reconstruction that match the stiffness, while not interrupting the normal loading pattern of a healthy bone, and help to combat stress shielding and stress concentration. This review summarises various approaches to achieve stiffness-matching: application of materials with modulus close to that of the bone; adaptation of geometry with pre-defined mechanical properties; and/or surface modification that ensures good integration and proper load transfer to the bone.

Indications for the removal of implants after fracture healing: A comparison between human and veterinary medicine

Indications for implant removal after fracture healing are still under debate in both human and veterinary medicine. Although hardware removal is a common procedure, it should not be undertaken lightly. Intra and post-operative complications are common and a thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits should be performed. This review aimed to collect and summarise published data on the indications for implant removal in small animals, compare the collected data with human and equine medicine, and investigate the existence of guidelines for this purpose. There is no international consensual agreement for implant removal after fracture healing, neither in small animals nor in human orthopaedics. Decision-making processes are still controversial in some scenarios, thus clear evidence-based protocols for implant removal are needed.

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Bio-Inspired Adhesive for Bone Fixation

Compared to metallic hardware, an effective bone adhesive can revolutionize the treatment of clinically challenging situations such as comminuted, articular, and pediatric fractures. The present study aims to develop such a bio-inspired bone adhesive, based upon a modified mineral-organic adhesive with tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) and phosphoserine (OPS) by incorporating nanoparticles of polydopamine (nPDA). The optimal formulation, which was screened using in vitro instrumental tensile adhesion tests, was found to be 50%_molTTCP/50%_molOPS-2%_wtnPDA with a liquid-to-powder ratio of 0.21 mL/g. This adhesive has a substantially stronger adhesive strength (1.0-1.6 MPa) to bovine cortical bone than the adhesive without nPDA (0.5-0.6 MPa). To simulate a clinical scenario of autograft fixation under low mechanical load, we presented the first in vivo model: a rat fibula glued to the tibia, on which the TTCP/OPS-nPDA adhesive (n = 7) was shown to be effective in stabilizing the graft without displacement (a clinical success rate of 86% and 71% at 5 and 12 weeks, respectively) compared to a sham control (0%). Significant coverage of newly formed bone was particularly observed on the surface of the adhesive, thanks to the osteoinductive property of nPDA. To conclude, the TTCP/OPS-nPDA adhesive fulfilled many clinical requirements for the bone fixation, and potentially could be functionalized via nPDA to offer more biological activities, e.g., anti-infection after antibiotic loading.

Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis

PURPOSE

Following proximal humeral fractures hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are performed if osteosynthesis or conservative treatment is not possible. HA has been reported to result in decreased functional outcomes compared with rTSA. Secondary shoulder arthroplasty, performed after a different initial treatment, has also been associated with inferior outcomes.

METHODS

Patients recieving a shoulder arthroplasty related to a proximal humeral fracture from 2010 to 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes was performed using QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV).

RESULTS

The mean [standard deviation (SD)] follow-up time among the 82 included patients was 48 (28) months. The mean age was 70 (10) years. The mean age for HA was significantly different from rTSA [57 (9) and 72 (21) years; p < .001]. The mean QuickDASH score for primary arthroplasty was 11 (2) versus 12 (16) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .313). The mean SSV for primary arthroplasty was 84 (22) versus 82 (17) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .578). The mean QuickDASH score for HA was 24 (36) versus 9 (15) for rTSA (p = .346). The mean SSV for HA was 70 (34) versus 86 (17) for rTSA (p = .578).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcomes after fracture-related shoulder arthroplasty were excellent in an older population, even when performed secondarily after failed primary osteosynthesis or conservative treatment. No significant differences in shoulder function were identified between rTSA and HA, likely due to restrictive indications for HA.

One-Stage Osteochondral Fracture Repair Technique With Knotless Anchors and Interconnected Crossing Suture Sliding Loops for the Knee

Osteochondral fractures of the knee represent a challenging entity to manage since there are many different surgical techniques for cartilage repair or other salvage procedures. In terms of cartilage repair, several hardware devices can be used, and many of them could imply a second-stage surgery for hardware removal. The purpose of this article is to describe in detail a one-stage osteochondral fracture repair technique with knotless anchors and interconnected crossing suture sliding loops for the knee. This technique is a one-stage open or arthroscopic procedure with an unlimited number of loops configurations with no particular need for a second surgery for hardware removal, no knot damage, and without the use of bone tunnels. It can be used in different cartilage anatomic locations, such as femoral condyles, trochlea, patella, or other joints.

Do mandibular miniplates increase the risk of complex fracture in facial trauma recurrence? Case series

Whether to conserve or remove miniplates, widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, has not been agreed on in the literature. Complications such as pain, infection, and screw exposure or loosening have already been largely described. We present the consequences of a trauma recurrence on a mandible with miniplates. The data of 13 patients who had a mandibular fracture previously surgically treated with miniplates (ten mandibular fractures and three mandibular osteotomies) were analysed. All the patients were male; the average age was 32 years (range, 20-64 years). The mechanism of the second trauma was assault in most of the cases. The average time between the first osteosynthesis and the new fracture was 35 months (range, 6-128 months). The fractures occurred at a distance from the miniplates in all the cases except two. No plate fracture was reported. We hypothesised that miniplates reinforced the underlying bone, protecting it from fractures, and transmitted the forces to areas anterior or posterior to the miniplates or to the condyle. Thus, the risk of mandible trauma recurrence should be taken into account in the indication of plate removal, and the biomechanical consequences of the conservation of the miniplates should be studied.

Complications of hardware removal in pediatric upper limb surgery: A retrospective single-center study of 317 patients

Previous studies indicated that hardware removal may lead to increased morbidity and therefore, at least in adults, remains questionable for certain indications. However, risks such as corrosion or local reactions may be less likely in younger patients with current, improved hardware materials. We sought to retrospectively determine complication rates of hardware removal in pediatric upper limb surgery, and establish potential risk factors for increased morbidity.All children and adolescents who underwent inpatient hardware removal under anesthesia after previous upper limb surgery between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The following details were extracted at the latest follow-up: demographics, implant location, hardware material, duration of surgery, duration of hardware in situ, and any complications graded according to Goslings et al (grade 0-5) and Sink et al (grade 1-5), respectively. Correlations were calculated to establish potential relationships between specific outcome parameters (e.g., location, duration of surgery etc.) and complication grades.A total of 2089 children were evaluated of whom 317 patients with 449 interventions (mean age 9.4 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. Overall, 203 K-wires (46%), 97 plates (22%), 102 external fixators (23%), 32 intramedullary nails (7%), 6 screws (1%), 4 cerclages (1%) and 1 pin (0.2%) were removed; most common locations were the forearm (34%) and humerus (24%). The mean duration of surgery was 40 minutes (± 50.9), mean time in situ was 194 days (± 319.6). Complication rates were low overall, with most being grade 0 (n = 372; 83%) or 1 (n = 60; 13%) according to Goslings et al and grade 1 (n = 386; 86%) and 2 (n = 42; 9%) according to Sink et al. No severe complications were observed. The following predictors were related to the severity of the complications in linear regression analysis: more distal localizations, external fixators, longer duration of surgery and female sex.Hardware removal under anesthesia in the pediatric upper extremity has produced a low complication rate with no severe complications and can thus be considered to be safe. Increased morbidity occurred in more distal localizations, external fixators, longer surgeries and females.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV.