The distribution of H1 histone is nonuniform in chromatin and correlates with different degrees of condensation

Oligodendroglioma cells synthesize the differentiation-specific linker histone H1˚ and release it into the extracellular environment through shed vesicles

Chromatin remodelling can be involved in some of the epigenetic modifications found in tumor cells. One of the mechanisms at the basis of chromatin dynamics is likely to be synthesis and incorporation of replacement histone variants, such as the H1° linker histone. Regulation of the expression of this protein can thus be critical in tumorigenesis. In developing brain, H1° expression is mainly regulated at the post-transcriptional level and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are involved. In the past, attention mainly focused on the whole brain or isolated neurons and little information is available on H1° expression in other brain cells. Even less is known relating to tumor glial cells. In this study we report that, like in maturing brain and isolated neurons, H1° synthesis sharply increases in differentiating astrocytes growing in a serum-free medium, while the corresponding mRNA decreases. Unexpectedly, in tumor glial cells both H1° RNA and protein are highly expressed, in spite of the fact that H1° is considered a differentiation-specific histone variant. Persistence of H1° mRNA in oligodendroglioma cells is accompanied by high levels of H1° RNA-binding activities which seem to be present, at least in part, also in actively proliferating, but not in differentiating, astrocytes. Finally, we report that oligodendroglioma cells, but not astrocytes, release H1° protein into the culture medium by shedding extracellular vesicles. These findings suggest that deregulation of H1° histone expression can be linked to tumorigenesis.

Developmentally regulated linker histone H1c promotes heterochromatin condensation and mediates structural integrity of rod photoreceptors in mouse retina

Mature rod photoreceptor cells contain very small nuclei with tightly condensed heterochromatin. We observed that during mouse rod maturation, the nucleosomal repeat length increases from 190 bp at postnatal day 1 to 206 bp in the adult retina. At the same time, the total level of linker histone H1 increased reaching the ratio of 1.3 molecules of total H1 per nucleosome, mostly via a dramatic increase in H1c. Genetic elimination of the histone H1c gene is functionally compensated by other histone variants. However, retinas in H1c/H1e/H1(0) triple knock-outs have photoreceptors with bigger nuclei, decreased heterochromatin area, and notable morphological changes suggesting that the process of chromatin condensation and rod cell structural integrity are partly impaired. In triple knock-outs, nuclear chromatin exposed several epigenetic histone modification marks masked in the wild type chromatin. Dramatic changes in exposure of a repressive chromatin mark, H3K9me2, indicate that during development linker histone plays a role in establishing the facultative heterochromatin territory and architecture in the nucleus. During retina development, the H1c gene and its promoter acquired epigenetic patterns typical of rod-specific genes. Our data suggest that histone H1c gene expression is developmentally up-regulated to promote facultative heterochromatin in mature rod photoreceptors.

Histone H1 subtypes differentially modulate chromatin condensation without preventing ATP-dependent remodeling by SWI/SNF or NURF

Although ubiquitously present in chromatin, the function of the linker histone subtypes is partly unknown and contradictory studies on their properties have been published. To explore whether the various H1 subtypes have a differential role in the organization and dynamics of chromatin we have incorporated all of the somatic human H1 subtypes into minichromosomes and compared their influence on nucleosome spacing, chromatin compaction and ATP-dependent remodeling. H1 subtypes exhibit different affinities for chromatin and different abilities to promote chromatin condensation, as studied with the Atomic Force Microscope. According to this criterion, H1 subtypes can be classified as weak condensers (H1.1 and H1.2), intermediate condensers (H1.3) and strong condensers (H1.0, H1.4, H1.5 and H1x). The variable C-terminal domain is required for nucleosome spacing by H1.4 and is likely responsible for the chromatin condensation properties of the various subtypes, as shown using chimeras between H1.4 and H1.2. In contrast to previous reports with isolated nucleosomes or linear nucleosomal arrays, linker histones at a ratio of one per nucleosome do not preclude remodeling of minichromosomes by yeast SWI/SNF or Drosophila NURF. We hypothesize that the linker histone subtypes are differential organizers of chromatin, rather than general repressors.

The histone H1 family: specific members, specific functions?

The linker histone H1 binds to the DNA entering and exiting the nucleosomal core particle and has an important role in establishing and maintaining higher order chromatin structures. H1 forms a complex family of related proteins with distinct species, tissue and developmental specificity. In higher eukaryotes all H1 variants have the same general structure, consisting of a central conserved globular domain and less conserved N-terminal and C-terminal tails. These tails are moderately conserved among species, but differ among variants, suggesting a specific function for each H1 variant. Due to compensatory mechanisms and to the lack of proper tools, it has been very difficult to study the biological role of individual variants in chromatin-mediated processes. Our knowledge about H1 variants is indeed limited, and in vitro and in vivo observations have often been contradictory. Therefore, H1 variants were considered to be functionally redundant. However, recent knockout studies and biochemical analyses in different organisms have revealed exciting new insights into the specificity and mechanisms of actions of the H1 family members. Here, we collect and compare the available literature about H1 variants and discuss possible specific roles that challenge the concept of H1 being a mere structural component of chromatin and a general repressor of transcription.

Analysis of histones, histone variants, and their post-translationally modified forms

For many years, histones were considered passive structural components of eukaryotic chromatin. Meanwhile it has been proven that histones also participate in gene regulation and repression via post-translational modification. The multitude of these post-translational modifications and the existence of numerous histone variants require particular separation strategies for their analysis, a prerequisite for studying biological processes. The most widely utilized techniques for the separation of histones, namely PAGE, HPCE, RP-HPLC, and hydrophilic Interaction LC, are reviewed here. Problems inherent to the analysis of histones owing to their unique physical and chemical properties along with advantages and shortcomings of particular methods are discussed.

Global gene expression analysis reveals specific and redundant roles for H1 variants, H1c and H1(0), in gene expression regulation

In mammals, the functional significance of the presence of evolutionarily conserved, multiple non-allelic H1 variants remains unclear. We used a unique overproduction approach coupled with cell cycle synchronization and early time point assays to assess differential effects of H1 variants, H1c and H1(0), on global gene expression in the absence of compensatory events that may mask variant-specific effects. We found that H1c and H1(0) act primarily as specific rather than global regulators of gene expression. Many of the genes affected were uniquely targeted by either H1c or H1(0), affirming that H1 variants have some unique roles. We also identified genes that were affected by both variants, in which cases the expression of these genes was, for the most part, affected similarly by both the variants. This observation suggests that as well as having specific functions, the H1 variants share common roles in the organization of chromatin. We further noted that H1(0) repressed more genes than did H1c, which may underlie the prevailing notion that H1(0) is a stronger repressor of transcription.

Beyond the walls of the nucleus: the role of histones in cellular signaling and innate immunity

Although they are one of the oldest family of proteins known (first described in 1884 by Kossel), histones continue to surprise researchers with their ever expanding roles in biology. In the past 25 years, the view of core histone octamers as a simple spool around which DNA in the nucleus is wound and linker histones as mere fasteners clipping it all together has transformed into the realization that histones play a vital role in transcriptional regulation. Through post-translational modifications, histones control the accessibility of transcription factors and a host of other proteins to multiple, conceivably thousands of, genes at once. While researchers have spent decades deciphering the role of histones in the overall structure of chromatin, it might surprise some to find that an entirely separate faction of scientists have focused on the role of histones beyond the confines of the nuclear envelope. In the past decade, there has been an accumulation of observations that suggest that histones can be found at the mitochondrion during the onset of apoptotic signaling and even at the cell surface, acting as a receptor for bacterial and viral proteins. More provocatively, immunologists are becoming convinced that they can also be found in the lumen of several tissues, acting as antimicrobial agents--critical components of an ancient innate immune system. Perhaps nowhere is this observation as dramatic as in the ability of neutrophils to entrap bacterial pathogens by casting out "nets" of DNA and histones that not only act as a physical barrier, but also display bactericidal activity. As our views regarding the role of histones inside and outside the cell evolve, some have begun to develop therapies that either utilize or target histones in the fight against cancer, microbial infection, and autoimmune disease. It is our goal here to begin the process of merging the dichotomous lives of histones both within and without the nuclear membrane.

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions

BACKGROUND

Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact.

METHODS

A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.

Histone H1 variants play individual roles in transcription regulation in the DT40 chicken B cell line

Thirty-nine of the 44 chicken histone genes are located in a major gene cluster of 110 kb, the others being distributed in four separate regions. All 6 H1 genes, which are present in the cluster and encode different variants, are expressed in the DT40 chicken B cell line, at levels ranging from about 5 to 40%. To clarify differences in the natures of these H1 variants, using gene-targeting techniques, we generated a series of DT40 mutants, which are devoid of each of the 5 H1 genes, respectively. Analyses of six H1-deficient mutants, comprising the latter five and a previously generated H1-deficient mutant, revealed that the protein patterns on 2D-PAGE were definitely different from each other, indicating that each H1 variant plays an individual role in the transcription regulation of specific genes in DT40 cells.

Effects of H1 histone variant overexpression on chromatin structure

The importance of histone H1 heterogeneity and total H1 stoichiometry in chromatin has been enigmatic. Here we report a detailed characterization of the chromatin structure of cells overexpressing either H1(0) or H1c. Nucleosome spacing was found to change during cell cycle progression, and overexpression of either variant in exponentially growing cells results in a 15-base pair increase in nucleosome repeat length. H1 histones can also assemble on chromatin and influence nucleosome spacing in the absence of DNA replication. Overexpression of H1(0) and, to a lesser extent, H1c results in a decreased rate of digestion of chromatin by micrococcal nuclease. Using green fluorescent protein-tagged H1 variants, we show that micrococcal nuclease-resistant chromatin is specifically enriched in the H1(0) variant. Overexpression of H1(0) results in the appearance of a unique mononucleosome species of higher mobility on nucleoprotein gels. Domain switch mutagenesis revealed that either the N-terminal tail or the central globular domain of the H1(0) protein could independently give rise to this unique mononucleosome species. These results in part explain the differential effects of H1(0) and H1c in regulating chromatin structure and function.

Poly(ADPribosyl)ation system in transcriptionally active rat testis chromatin fractions

The rat testis chromatin fractions (soluble, S, and insoluble, P) were prepared by mild digestion of nuclei with DNAase I. They appeared to be different in specific biochemical features such as their transcriptional competence and protein patterns, the latter indicating according to results previously obtained, that the testis-specific H1t is preferentially associated to the soluble fraction, whereas the other H1 variants are localized in the pellet. S and P chromatins also differed in the distribution of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ating system, (poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase, reaction product and acceptor proteins), detected by incubating nuclei with 32P-NAD. The 32P-modified H1s and core histones of both fractions, known as specific ADPribose target proteins, were separated by high performance liquid chromatography and it was demonstrated that the H1 variants from S and P are differently ADPribosylated, being H1t always the best acceptor, and that most of the ADPribosylated variants were solubilized after DNase I treatment. The further digestion of P chromatin with the nuclease produced a fraction (pP) devoid of most DNA, but particularly enriched in transcriptionally competent tracts. The low DNA content of pP chromatin, which reflects the typical feature of a nuclear matrix, corresponded to a relevant poly(ADPribosyl)ation, the highest as compared to S and P fractions. Moreover, long and branched chains of poly(ADP-ribose) were found associated to pP sample which resemble the products determined in the soluble chromatin.

Targeted disruption of H2B-V encoding a particular H2B histone variant causes changes in protein patterns on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the DT40 chicken B cell line

The chicken H2B gene family comprises eight members (H2B-I to H2B-VIII), which are all located in two major histone gene clusters. All of them have been shown to encode four different protein variants (classes I to IV). In the DT40 chicken B cell line, the H2B-V gene, encoding the class III H2B variant, constituted about 10% of the total intracellular mRNA from all the H2B genes. To study the nature of this particular variant in vivo, we generated heterozygous (H2B-V, +/-) and homozygous (H2B-V, -/-) DT40 mutants by targeted integration. The remaining H2B genes were shown to be expressed more in these mutants than in the wild-type cell lines. The growth rate of DT40 cells was unchanged in the absence of the H2B-V gene. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that the protein patterns were, on the whole, similar between the wild-type and homozygous cell lines. However, within this constant background, some cellular proteins disappeared or decreased quantitatively in the homozygous mutants, and several other proteins increased or newly appeared. These results suggest that the class III H2B variant participates negatively or positively in regulation of the expression of particular genes that encode the proteins that vary in DT40 cells. This type of regulation is possibly mediated through alterations in nucleosome structure over the restricted regions involving the putative genes of the DT40 genome.

Glucocorticoid-induced changes in liver: effect of dexamethasone administration on DNA topoisomerase I and II activities and distribution of histone H1 subtypes

The activities of DNA topoisomerase I and II and the relative proportions of the histone H1 subtypes were investigated in rat liver which was undergoing hypertrophy and exhibiting increased transcriptional activity following the administration of dexamethasone. There was a rise in the level of activity of DNA topoisomerase I and a slight fall in that of DNA topoisomerase II. The relative proportions of the H1 subtypes were altered due to a preferential increase in H1.1. The results are discussed in relation to the effect of glucocorticoids on the transcription and replication of hepatic DNA.

Specific interaction between H1 histone and high mobility protein HMG1

High mobility group proteins HMG1 and -2 and histone H1 are structural components of chromatin. Previously, we reported that HMG1 interacts with H1 histone in a way that modulates the ability of H1 to condense DNA in vitro, suggesting that these proteins may act together in vivo to regulate locally the condensation state of chromatin, possibly affecting replication and/or transcription. Here we show that reduced (native) HMG1 binds to H1 cooperatively at pH 6.0 as a tetramer with a dissociation constant of 3.4 x 10(-8) M, and at pH 7.5 as a monomer with a dissociation constant less than 10(-9) M. Denaturation through oxidation of sulfhydryl groups has a strong effect on the interaction of HMG1 with H1 histone, suggesting that the reduced state of HMG1 is critical to its function. Oxidized HMG1 failed to bind H1 at pH 7.5, and its binding at pH 6 was biphasic; the first three (or two) molecules of H1 were bound with a dissociation constant of 2 x 10(-8) M with negative cooperativity, and the last one (or two) H1's were bound cooperatively with KD = 1.8 x 10(-7) M. Regulation of the pH or the concentration of some other ion may be used in vivo to alter the interactions between HMG1 and -2, H1 histone, and DNA.

Presence of particular transcription regulatory elements in the 5'-intergenic region shared by the chicken H2A-III and H2B-V pair

The two chicken histone gene families, H2A and H2B, contain nine and eight members, respectively, within two major histone gene clusters. Six genes each from families H2A and H2B have been found to be closely associated in inverted directions as H2A/H2B gene pairs. Two previously sequenced H2A members (H2A-I and H2A-II) encode the same amino acid (aa) sequence (class I), whereas seven sequenced H2B genes encode three different variants (classes I, II and III). In this study, we first sequenced H2A-III, a member of the H2A family, which is located in inverted orientation and 350 bp upstream from H2B-V, encoding the class-III H2B protein. The protein encoded by H2A-III differs from the class-I H2A protein in a single aa (Ala70-->Pro; class II). As a step toward elucidation of the transcriptional regulation of the H2A and H2B families, we fused this 5'-intergenic region to the cat gene in inverted orientations to generate two chimeric plasmids, pH2A-III-350 and pH2B-V-350. Transient CAT assays using these constructs indicated that the promoter of H2B-V is more active than that of H2A-III. CAT assays with 5'-deletion mutants of H2A-III and H2B-V showed that they each possess particular transcriptional motifs which are located relatively close to, or apart from, their own coding regions. These findings, together with those reported previously on the H2A-V/H2B-II pair, suggest distinct manners of transcription regulation of different members of the chicken histone gene families, H2A and H2B.

Fractionation of human H1 subtypes and characterization of a subtype-specific antibody exhibiting non-uniform nuclear staining

Four histone H1 subtypes and H1(0) were fractionated from human placental nuclei and purified to homogeneity by a combination of Bio-Rex 70 chromatography and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Polyclonal antibodies were generated in rabbits against one of these subtypes designated H1-3. Antibodies reacted only against this subtype in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and Western assays; subtype specificity was documented further by Western blotting of cell and nuclear extracts. They crossreacted with monkey H1, but not with H1 from other vertebrates tested. The epitope(s) recognized were mapped by immunoblotting against peptides prepared by cleavage with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) and alpha-chymotrypsin; it includes the variant amino-terminal tail of the protein as well as a portion of the globular domain. The antibody stains mitotic chromosomes weakly but uniformly and, unlike antibodies that recognize total H1 which show uniform nuclear staining after indirect immunofluorescence localization, anti-H1-3 exhibits preferential labelling of the nuclear periphery. This non-uniform staining suggests compartmentalization of this subtype which may have functional significance with respect to differential chromatin condensation.

The chicken histone gene family

1. Most of the chicken 43 core and H1 histone genes belong to two major histone gene clusters. 2. Each of six H1 genes encodes a different H1 protein sequence. 3. The known core histone genes, four H2A, seven H2B, and seven H3 genes, respectively, encode two, three and three different protein variants, whereas the four known H4 genes encode the same amino acid sequence. 4. The core histone genes have particular transcription regulatory elements within the 5'-flanking regions and the regulations of their expressions are distinct, even though they are members of the same core histone gene family. 5. There are some undefined differences in the DNA structures of the particular core histone genes in various chicken tissues and these structural variations probably result in differences in their transcriptional regulation.

Histone H1 interacts specifically with certain regions of the mouse alpha-globin gene

We used fragments of a cloned mouse alpha-globin gene to determine if histone H1 interacts selectively with defined regions of a eukaryotic gene. The use of intact plasmids instead of isolated fragments permitted study of relevant sequences in their superhelical form. Several independent experimental approaches (filter binding, precipitation, binding to protein immobilized on nitrocellulose membranes, and agarose gel electrophoresis of the protein-DNA complexes) were used and the histone-DNA interaction was investigated under both noncompetitive and competitive conditions. Binding to subclones encompassing the 5' end of the gene and the first half of the coding sequence is preferred over binding to other subclones. The expression of the sequence-specific selectivity depends on the ionic strength of the binding reaction; the selectivity is mainly expressed under conditions of non-cooperative binding of the histone to DNA. No correlation is observed between AT content and relative affinity of binding to H1. Evidently, other features of DNA structure are involved in the specific H1 binding.

Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function

The belief that histone H1 interacts primarily with DNA in chromatin and much less with the protein component has led to numerous studies of artificial H1-DNA complexes. This review summarizes and discusses the data on different aspects of the interaction between the linker histone and naked DNA, including cooperativity of binding, preference for supercoiled DNA, selectivity with respect to base composition and nucleotide sequence, and effect of H1 binding on the conformation of the underlying DNA. The nature of the interaction, the structure of the complexes, and the role histone H1 exerts in chromatin are also discussed.

Major chromatin changes accompany extinction of alpha-fetoprotein gene in hepatoma x fibroblast hybrids

The sensitivity of the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene to digestion by the enzyme DNaseI, and the presence of hypersensitive sites in the 5' region of this gene, were examined in hepatoma x fibroblast hybrid cells that exhibit extinction of AFP gene expression. Major changes occur in the extinguished gene, i.e., loss of long-range sensitivity to DNase digestion and of the hypersensitive sites. In this respect, the extinguished gene resembles the corresponding silent gene present in fibroblasts, but differs from the silent gene present in normal adult hepatocytes. These observations suggest that extinguisher factors acting on the AFP gene alter its conformation.

Irreversible changes occur in chromatin structure upon dissociation of histone H1

The role of histone H1 in the actual interactions bringing about chromatin folding is investigated by studying the reversibility of its dissociation. H1 was dissociated by increase of the NaCl concentration and reassociated by dialysis, without removal from the dialysis bag. To scrutinize the fidelity of this stoichiometric form of chromatin reconstitution, we use circular dichroism, nuclease digestion, thermal denaturation and the sensitive electric birefringence method. No alteration of the repeat length and no nucleosomal sliding are observed upon the reassociation procedure. However, under all the different conditions investigated, the original value of the positive electric birefringence is never recovered, indicating an irreversible change of structure. CD and melting profiles confirm that DNA-protein interactions are modified, and orientational relaxation time measurements indicate that these structural perturbations affect the salt-induced transition of polynucleosomal fibers. The striking conclusion of these studies is that variations of ionic concentration are sufficient to induce irreversible structural alterations affecting the higher-order folding of chromatin. It is of interest that the only sample which exhibits behavior upon reassociation comparable to that of native chromatin is the one which experienced the fastest salt transitions. We suggest that these conformational changes arise from the unbinding to DNA of certain basic tails of histone(s), and that a competition for DNA binding locations exists upon the reassociation. These results are then additional arguments (Mazen, A., Hacques, M.F. and Marion, C.,J. Mol. Biol. 194, 741-745 (1987)), to suggest that dissociation of H1 might modify a direct interaction between basic tails of core histones and H1.

Non-histone chromosomal protein HMG1 reduces the histone H5-induced changes in c.d. spectra of DNA: the acidic C-terminus of HMG1 is necessary for binding to H5

Chemical cross-linking was used to study the interaction between non-histone high-mobility-group (HMG)1 and histone H5 in free solution. The presence of acidic C-terminal domain in HMG1 was shown to be a prerequisite for HMG1 binding to histone H5. The objective of this communication is to ascertain whether HMG1 could affect the conformation of DNA associated with a linker histone H5. Complexes of histone H5 with chicken erythrocyte DNA or an alternating purine-pyrimidine polynucleotide poly[d(A-T)] were prepared at different molar ratios H5/DNA. Changes in DNA conformation in the complexes with histone H5 or H5/HMG1 were monitored by circular dichroism (c.d.). Depending on the molar ratio H5/poly[d(A-T)], under conditions limiting the complex aggregation, three distinct types of c.d. spectra were observed. The addition of HMG1 to H5-DNA complexes reduced in all cases the histone H5-induced conformational changes in poly[d(A-T)]. The sensitivity of H5-poly[d(A-T)] complexes to HMG1 was inversely proportional to the amount of H5 in the complex. The effect of HMG1 was not observed upon removal of the acidic C-terminal domain of HMG1.

The role of charge neutralization and cooperative binding of linker histone in the higher-order structure of chromatin

The binding mode and stoichiometry of interaction between soluble rat liver chromatin and histone H1 (H1) were studied. H1 binding to chromatin is cooperative. Chromatin accepts 3.6 molecules of H1/nucleosome at 0 M salt, close to the required ratio for neutralization of 90% of the charges on the phosphate groups of chromatin (4.0 H1 molecules/nucleosome). The proposal is put forward that critical charge neutralization (90%) has a significant influence on the irregular appearance of chromatin.

Homology of histone H1 variants with adenine nucleotide-binding proteins

Significant homology was observed between the adenine nucleotide-binding domain in the catalytic subunit of bovine protein kinase A and the carboxy-terminal half of the globular domain of histone H1. A consensus sequence deducible from several previously characterized adenine nucleotide-binding sites is totally conserved in H1. In addition, several putative phosphate binding-sites were observed within the carboxyterminal tail and one in the cluster of basic amino acids in the aminoterminal tail. Both the putative adenine and phosphate-binding sites are well conserved through evolution in various species and in different H1 variants. The present data thus suggest that histone H1 variants may bind to adenine derivatives and imply that they may recognize a specific nucleotide sequence in DNA.

Use of protein blotting to study the DNA-binding properties of histone H1 and H1 variants

Sub-types of histone H1 have been observed in a variety of tissues from several organisms. One of the best characterized H1 variants is H5 from avian erythrocytes. Several lines of evidence suggest that H5 has a greater affinity for DNA than H1 and is thus thought to account, in part, for the highly condensed and transcriptionally repressed state of avian erythrocyte chromatin. In trout there is an analogous erythrocyte-specific H1 variant, previously termed 'H5' [B.L.A. Miki and J.M. Neelin (1975) Can. J. Biochem. 53, 1158-1169). Using a sensitive and rapid protein-blotting procedure which is specific amongst the histones for histone H1 and its variants, we compared DNA-binding properties of the trout erythrocyte histone 'H5' and chicken H5. By increasing the NaCl concentration of the binding buffer, a gradual decrease in the amount of DNA that bound to chicken H1, trout H1 and trout erythrocyte 'H5' variant was observed, such that at concentrations above 0.37 M, negligible amounts of DNA were bound. By contrast, chicken H5 bound a significantly greater amount of DNA even at a concentration of 0.4 M NaCl. Based on the DNA-binding, properties, we conclude that the trout erythrocyte variant 'H5' is more closely related to H1 than to H5. By assaying the DNA-binding affinity of calf thymus H1 DNA-binding affinity of calf thymus H1 peptide fragments, generated by protease and chemical cleavage, and the sperm-specific H1 variants of the annelid, Platynereis dumerilii, which possess greatly shortened C-terminal tails, we conclude that a domain that includes a very small portion of the C-terminal tail and part of the globular domain is sufficient for the binding of H1 to DNA.

Microheterogeneity in H1 histones and its consequences

The extent of microheterogeneity of H1 histones in individual higher organisms, without considering post-translational modifications, is such that five to eight molecular species can be recognized. The H1 variants differ among themselves in their ability to condense DNA and chromatin fragments, and they are non-uniformly distributed in chromatin. This review assembles data that support the notion that the differences in chromatin condensation (heterochromatization) observed through the microscope are maintained by the non-uniform distribution of H1 variants, and that this pattern of chromatin condensation may determine the dynamics of chromatin during replication and may represent the commitment aspect of differentiation. The differential response of the multiple H1 variants with regard to their synthesis and turnover is consistent with this notion.

The ubiquitinated histone species are enriched in histone H1-depleted chromatin regions

Bovine thymus and trout testis chromatin were fractionated into regions which differed in their micrococcal nuclease accessibility and solubility properties, and the distribution of the ubiquitinated histone species among these chromatin regions was elucidated. Ubiquitinated (u) species of histones H2A and H2B were enriched in the nuclease-sensitive, low-ionic-strength, soluble fraction of both chromatins. These results indicate that the presence of ubiquitinated histones may alter nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and destabilize higher-order chromatin structures. Bovine thymus chromatin was separated into aggregation-resistant, salt-soluble and aggregation-prone, salt-insoluble chromatin fractions. The aggregation-resistant chromatin fraction depleted in H1 histones was enriched in uH2A and uH2B, with uH2B showing the greater enrichment. The chromatin fragments were also stripped and reconstituted with the H1 histones prior to fractionation. The results were the same as above: uH2A and uH2B were preferentially localized in the aggregation-resistant. H1-depleted chromatin fraction, suggesting that chromatin regions enriched in ubiquitinated histone species have a reduced affinity for the H1 histones. Thus, ubiquitinated histone species may be one of the contributing factors in the differential assembly of various parts of the genome.

In vitro competition between adenosine(5')tetraphospho(5')adenosine and deoxyribonucleic acid in the reaction with diamminedichloroplatinum(II)

Competition between adenosine(5')tetraphospho(5')adenosine (Ap4A) and DNA for the synthesis of adducts with the cis or trans isomer of diamminedichloroplatinum(II) was measured in the presence and absence of magnesium and spermidinium ions. Reaction products were analysed by circular dichroism, poly(ethyleneimine) thin-layer chromatography and reversed-phase chromatography. Competition was affected by the oligovalent cations that bound specifically to the dinucleotide. Platination of DNA was favoured under all conditions. Chromatin was less competitive. The mechanism was kinetic competition, DNA reacting considerably faster than Ap4A. Platinum(II) did not exchange between adducts and free DNA and Ap4A, respectively. On that basis only low amounts of Ap4A adducts were estimated to be formed under conditions of clinical chemotherapy. The cis and trans isomers of diamminedichloroplatinum(II) were equally effective. Platinum(II) adducts of Ap4A were neither degraded by Ap4A-specific pyrophosphohydrolases nor by phosphodiesterase nor in the presence of unfractionated extract of calf thymus. Unphysiologically high concentrations of Crotalus durissus phosphodiesterase I were required for hydrolytic splitting, the amount of which was similar for both platinum(II) isomer adducts. The results suggest that Ap4A platinum(II) adducts might accumulate during chemotherapy of cancer treatment.

Histone separation by high-performance liquid chromatography on C4 reverse-phase columns

Previous work in our laboratory (Lindner, H., Helliger, W., and Puschendorf, B. (1986) J. Chromatogr. 357, 301-310) described a rapid separation of H1 and core histones by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using a Bio-Rad Hi-Pore butyl (C4) silica-based column. Despite the short elution time, a high resolution of the different histone fractions, except H4 and H2A (MHP), could be obtained. In this report we present a method for the separation of H4 and H2A (MHP) as well, while maintaining a similar analysis time. By varying the gradient, trifluoroacetic acid concentration (0.05%), and flow rate (1.3 ml/min) the histones were eluted from the C4 column in the following order: H1 (MHP), H1 (LHP), H2B, H2A (LHP), H4, H2A (MHP), H3 (LHP), and H3 (MHP). LHP and MHP refer to less and more hydrophobic histone variants. The identification of the individual protein fractions was performed by comparison the retention times with pure histone markers as well as by gel electrophoresis.

Effect of exogenous histone H5 on integration of histone H1 in rat liver chromatin. Correlations with aberrant epsilon-N-methylation of histone H1

Binding modes of histones H1 and H5, and their competition for chromatin-binding sites in rat liver nuclei, were correlated with aberrant N-methylation of H1 histone lysine residues, induced by chicken erythrocyte histone H5, in order to gain more insight into the integration of lysine-rich histones in chromatin. Addition of approx. 2.5 molecules of histone H5 per nucleosome to rat liver nuclei increases the ratio of total basic residues in histones to DNA nucleotides (BR/NT) in the nuclear chromatin from 1.0 to 1.5. At this concentration, approx. 0.7 molecule of histone H5 is bound per nucleosome, and there is no displacement of histone H1 from the nuclear chromatin. If S-adenosyl[Me-3H]methionine is present in the incubation mixture, the aberrant incorporation of labeled methyl groups into histone H1 reaches a maximum at this concentration of histone H5. The radioactivity present in histone H1 from nuclei incubated with labeled AdoMet at a total BR/NT ratio of 1.5: resides mainly in a histone H1 subfraction tentatively identified by Bio-Rex 70 chromatography and acrylamide gel electrophoresis as histone H1c; presents as a single spot upon peptide mapping of tryptic hydrolysates by means of two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography; and elutes in the position of mono-N-methyllysine upon ion-exchange chromatography of histone H1 hydrolysates. Upon further increase of the BR/NT ratio, the following changes are produced: a gradual decrease in radioactive methyl uptake into histone H1; a gradual displacement of histone H1 from the chromatin; increased binding of histone H5 in chromatin, up to a maximum of 3.4 residues per nucleosome; and a slowly increasing uptake of label into histone H5. The combined data from histone H1/H5 binding and histone H1 methylation studies suggest that upon addition of exogenous histone H5 to rat liver nuclei the binding of two lysine-rich histones per nucleosome plays a significant role in the induction of specific changes in chromatin structure, which in vivo may have important functional implications in terms of chromatin condensation and suppression of transcription.