Observations on the role of esophagogastrostomy in infancy and childhood with particular reference to the long-term results and operative mortality

Prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes and quality of life after gastric tube interposition as esophageal reconstruction in children

Few studies on gastric tube interposition for esophageal reconstruction in children have assessed the long-term outcomes and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes and QoL after a gastric tube interposition by reviewing our experiences with esophageal reconstruction.Twenty-six patients were included who underwent gastric tube interposition from 1996 to 2011 at our institution. We reviewed the medical records and conducted telephone surveys, prospectively performed esophagography, endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry. The median follow-up period of 12 (range, 3-18) years.Median age at the time of surgery and survey were 9 (range, 2-50) months and 12.4 (range, 3.1-19.0) years, respectively. There were 14 cases of reoperation of gross type C and B esophageal atresia (EA) and 10 cases of long gap pure EA. The z scores of anthropometric data at the survey did not increase after the operation. Severe stricture in esophagography was observed in 20% of patients, but improved with balloon dilation with intact passage. Gastroesophageal reflux was able to be treated with medications. Esophageal peristalsis was observed in 1 of 8 patients in manometry. No Barrett esophagus or metaplasia was not found from endoscopy. QoL was similar to the general population and did not differ between age groups.Gastric tube interposition could be considered for esophageal reconstruction in pediatric patients when native esophageal anastomosis is impossible. Nutritional evaluation and support with consecutive radiological evaluation to assess the anastomosis site stricture are advised.

Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience

AIM

To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children.

METHODS

All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years.

RESULTS

Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.

Esophageal replacement

This article focuses on esophageal replacement as a surgical option for pediatric patients with end-stage esophageal disease. While it is obvious that the patient׳s own esophagus is the best esophagus, persisting with attempts to retain a native esophagus with no function and at all costs are futile and usually detrimental to the overall well-being of the child. In such cases, the esophagus should be abandoned, and the appropriate esophageal replacement is chosen for definitive reconstruction. We review the various types of conduits used for esophageal replacement and discuss the unique advantages and disadvantages that are relevant for clinical decision-making.

Primary gastric pull-up in pure esophageal atresia: technique, feasibility and outcome. A prospective observational study

AIM

To perform a definitive procedure in pure esophageal atresia by gastric pull-up in the newborn.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A primary gastric pull-up was performed in six newborns with pure esophageal atresia that presented between 1998 and 2009. The cervical esophagus was mobilized through the neck, the stomach was mobilized through laparotomy, the left gastric artery was ligated, and Pyloromyotomy was done. The stomach was brought into the neck via the trans hiatal route. A single-layer esophageo-gastric anastomosis was done in the neck in all.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight was 2.1 kg (range 1.9-2.7) and the age at surgery varied from 3 to 7 days (mean 4.5 days). The mean operative time was 146 min. All six neonates received postoperative elective ventilation for a period of 2-7 days (mean 5.3). Epidural morphine was given for postoperative pain relief. Four received TPN for 5-13 days. Three had minor leaks from the neck wound that healed spontaneously. Mean hospital stay was 14.6 with a range 13-20 days. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to perform the gastric pull-up for long gap esophageal atresia in the newborn period, as a definitive procedure with no added risks to life in experienced hands.

Gastric transposition in children

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome in 192 children (116 males, 76 females) undergoing transposition since 1981.

METHODS

The most common indications for esophageal replacement included failed repair of different varieties of esophageal atresia (138), caustic injury (29), and peptic strictures (9). A total of 81% of the patients were referred from other hospitals (50% from other countries). Age at operation ranged from 7 days to 17 years. The gastric transposition was performed by using blunt mediastinal dissection in 98 patients, with an additional 90 patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. The retrosternal position was used in 4 patients.

RESULTS

There were no graft failures, including those who had previously had failed gastric tube or Scharli operations. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 12% (all but one resolved spontaneously). Anastomotic stricture, requiring dilation developed in 20%. Half of these patients had previously sustained caustic esophageal injury. There were 9 deaths in the group (4.6%). One death occurred intraoperatively, 5 in the early postoperative period, and there were 3 late deaths. In over 90% of our patients, the outcome was considered good to excellent in terms of absence of swallowing difficulties or other gastrointestinal symptoms. Many children preferred to eat small frequent meals. Poor outcome was particularly associated with multiple previous attempts at esophageal salvage. There was no deterioration in the function of the gastric transposition in those patients followed for more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric transposition for esophageal substitution is an acceptable procedure. It is attended by 4.6% mortality and a 12% leak rate. A total of 20% of the patients needed anastomotic dilation for stricture. In the long term, good function has been maintained. Gastric transposition compares favorably with other methods of esophageal replacement.

Esophageal replacement in the neonatal period in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after esophageal replacement using gastric pull-up performed in critically ill neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula.

METHODS

During 1998 to 2005, gastric transposition was performed in 27 neonates (mean birth weight, 2.32 kg [1.86-3.0 kg]; mean age, 6.08 days) for post-EA and tracheoesophageal fistula leaks in 17, long gap in 6, and pure EA in 4, using transhiatal route in all. Pyloromyotomy as the drainage procedure was added for all 27 neonates. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical evaluation, gastric clearance, duodenogastric reflux, and gastric pressure profile.

RESULTS

Six neonates had ongoing serious chest infection, 3 had lung collapse, and 2 had associated congenital heart disease. Postoperative elective ventilation was provided to all neonates for 2 to 40 days (mean, 10.6 days). Nine neonates developed postoperative leaks in the neck; all healed spontaneously before discharge. Mean hospital stay was 32.6 days (range, 9-87 days). Four newborns died on postoperative days 9, 13, 15, and 29 because of existing severe sepsis in 3 and major congenital heart disease in 1. Functional evaluations were done at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Values at 6 months revealed normal gastric emptying in 16 of 23, presence of duodenal gastric reflux in 11 of 23, and mass contractions with significant rise in intragastric pressure after bolus feeds in 16 of 23 cases. Values at 12 months revealed normal gastric emptying in 14 of 20, presence of duodenal gastric reflux in 8 of 20, and mass contractions with significant rise in intragastric pressure after bolus feeds in 13 (65%) of 20 cases.

CONCLUSION

Gastric transposition could be a lifesaving alternative to diversion, even in the critically ill newborns after major leaks. However, it requires technical surgical expertise and an effective pain relief and neonatal intensive care.

Esophageal replacement in children by an isoperistaltic gastric tube: a 12-year experience

The colonic segment is the most frequently used material for replacing the esophagus in children; however, the use of a gastric tube has become a reliable alternative operation. Since 1987, we have used an isoperistaltic gastric tube to replace the esophagus in children, and we present a series of 21 patients. Indications for operation included caustic injury (nine), esophageal atresia (eight), peptic stricture (two), congenital stricture (one), and esophageal duplication (one). There was no death or necrosis of the graft during the early postoperative period. The esophagogastric anastomosis leaked in two cases, but both of them closed spontaneously. A temporary dumping syndrome was encountered in two children. Two patients had strictures of their upper anastomosis responding to dilatations. The two patients who had a pharyngogastric anastomosis developed either intractable stricture or nonfunctioning anastomosis. One of them died 9 months later from aspiration pneumonitis. At follow-up, 16 of 21 patients could accept a normal diet (13 were entirely asymptomatic, and three suffered occasional mild dysphagia). Two patients suffered significant dysphagia (one had a durable dilation of his gastric tube), and three needed a feeding jejunostomy. Acid secretion of the gastric tube was proved in nine cases. Two patients were shown to have cervical Barrett's esophagus above the anastomosis. These findings indicate the need for lifelong endoscopic follow-up for these patients.

Gastric transposition in children--a 21-year experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome in 173 children (104 M, 69 F) undergoing transposition since 1981.

METHODS

The most common indications for esophageal replacement included failed repair of different varieties of esophageal atresia (127), caustic injury (23), and peptic strictures (8). A total of 81% of the patients were referred from other hospitals (50% from other countries). Age at operation ranged from 7 days to 17 years. The gastric transposition was performed using blunt mediastinal dissection only in 90 patients with an additional 81 patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. The retrosternal position was used in 2 patients.

RESULTS

There were no graft failures including those who had previously failed gastric tube or Scharlilike operations. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 12% (all but 1 resolved spontaneously). Anastomotic stricture requiring dilatation occurred in 19.6%. Half of these patients had previous caustic esophageal injury. There were 9 deaths in the group (5.2%). One death occurred intraoperatively, 5 in the early postoperative period, and there were 3 late deaths. In more than 90% of our patients, the outcome was considered good to excellent in terms of absence of swallowing difficulties or other gastrointestinal symptoms. Many, however, preferred to eat small frequent meals. Poor outcome was particularly associated with multiple previous attempts at esophageal salvage. There was no deterioration in the function of the gastric transposition in those patients followed up for more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric transposition for esophageal substitution is an acceptable procedure. It is attended by 5% mortality and a 12% leak rate. A total of 19.6% of the patients needed anastomotic dilatation for stricture. In the long term, good function has been maintained. Gastric transposition compares favorably with alternative methods of esophageal replacement.

Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.

Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.

Esophageal replacement with colon in children using either the intrathoracic or retrosternal route: an analysis of both surgical and long-term results

A total of 28 colon esophageal replacements performed in children for long gap esophageal atresia (22 patients), and intractable caustic stricture (6 patients) were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on identifying the pros and cons of the different reconstruction techniques: intrathoracic route (ITR) (19 patients) and retrosternal route (RSR) (9 patients). No hospital mortality occurred, whereas a higher morbidity rate occurred among patients operated on using the ITR as opposed to the RSR (68% vs 55%; P not significant). Six patients developed an anastomotic fistula (21% with the ITR vs 22% with the RSR; P not significant), whereas an anastomotic stenosis occurred in 13 patients (67% with the RSR, and 37% with the ITR; P < 0.07). Overall, dysphagia was the most prevalent symptom at 3 months follow-up, but had significantly decreased at the final follow-up (54% vs 16%; P < 0.0027). Functional results improved significantly during the follow-up (score 1-2 vs score 3-4; Fisher test: P = 0.001). However, despite the higher morbidity rate, better functional results were achieved using the ITR as opposed to the RSR.

Gastric tube as the primary procedure for pure esophageal atresia

Long gap esophageal atresia occurs in approximately 5% of patients with tracheoesophageal anomalies. A small group of such patients have a rudimentary or diverticular distal esophagus that is not amenable to primary repair. These children usually require staged procedures and esophageal replacement using other parts of the intestinal tract. To circumvent the morbidity and delayed repair associated with cervical esophagostomy, colon interposition, or delayed gastric tube interposition, the authors propose the use of a primary gastric tube for early establishment of esophageal continuity in the neonate. Three cases of early esophageal replacement using a gastric tube are described. All three patients were born prematurely, with comorbid conditions, and had a rudimentary distal esophagus. The results of the operation were successful. The authors believe that primary repair of the esophagus, when possible, is the gold standard.

Gastric transposition for esophageal substitution in children

Fifty-four gastric transposition procedures have been carried out for esophageal substitution in the 10-year period 1981 through 1990. The indication for esophageal replacement was esophageal atresia in 36 (19 long-gap atresia with distal fistula and 17 isolated atresia), caustic stricture in 9, intractable peptic reflux stricture in 3, 2 achalasia and 1 each of prolonged foreign body impaction, diffuse leiomyoma, congenital esophageal stenosis, and congenital short esophagus. Eight patients had previously undergone an unsuccessful colonic replacement procedure. The age at gastric transposition ranged from 4 months to 16 years. The procedure of choice was posterior mediastinal transposition without thoracotomy in 37 cases. The esophagogastric anastomosis leaked in 7 patients (12.9%), all of which closed spontaneously, whereas 5 patients developed an anastomotic stricture that responded to bouginage. There were 5 deaths (9.2%). Major complications developed postoperatively in 12 patients: 4 required additional gastric drainage procedures, 2 required temporary tracheostomy, 2 developed adhesion obstruction, and 1 each developed paraesophageal hernia, leakage of the jejunal feeding tube, tracheomalacia, and major hemorrhage following resection of a colonic graft. Major but temporary feeding problems were encountered in 12 children. Medium-term results were assessed as excellent in 67%, good in 20%, fair in 6%, and poor in 6% of the 34 patients surviving longer than 1 year postoperatively (ie, excluding 7 patients lost to follow-up).

Success and failure with neonatal tracheo-oesophageal anomalies

In seven and a half years, one surgical team treated 67 consecutive neonates with oesophageal atresia and/or tracheo-oesophageal fistula. According to Waterston's classification, 28 were in group A, 12 in group B and 27 in group C. The mortality rate during the initial admission was 10 per cent, all seven deaths being unavoidable in infants in group C with multiple anomalies. Birthweight alone had no bearing upon the chances of survival. Primary oesophageal repair, including one suture-fistula procedure and one delayed primary repair, was attempted in 54 (84 per cent) of the 64 patients with atresia and was successful in 46 (85 per cent). All three H-type tracheo-oesophageal fistulae were successfully divided in infants in group A. Recurrent tracheo-oesophageal fistula developed in four (7 per cent) infants, one of whom (group A) underwent successful repair. One disrupted anastomosis was successfully resutured (group A), so an intact oesophagus was finally achieved in 51 patients, of whom six (12 per cent) developed anastomotic strictures and 21 (41 per cent) underwent surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Of the 60 early survivors, 10 (17 per cent) underwent aortopexy for tracheomalacia. Whenever possible, primary repair is advocated in all infants. Even for those in group C with multiple, severe associated anomalies, the combined early and late mortality was no greater following primary repair (7 died of 12 operated) than after staged repair (4 died of 7 operated), but major anastomotic complications were more common in infants in group C (5 out of 19) than in those in groups A and B (3 out of 38).

Total gastric transposition: an alternative to esophageal replacement in children

Total gastric transposition was performed in 21 children as an alternative procedure for esophageal replacement. The age at the operation ranged from 15 months to 11 years. Half of the children were less than 2 years old. Fifteen patients had esophageal atresia. The stomach was passed toward the neck either through the esophageal bed (6 cases, with concomitant blunt esophagectomy without thoracotomy) or the retrosternal route (15 cases). There was one death in the early postoperative period secondary to an anastomotic leak and acute mediastinitis in a case of pharyngogastric anastomosis. Three other patients developed cervical leak with spontaneous closure but this ultimately led to a late anastomotic stricture (more than 6 months) requiring endoscopic dilatation. Only one child needed more than three attempts of endoscopic dilatation. None of these patients required surgical revision. The mean follow-up was 60 months (range, 10 to 122 months). Despite bulky atonic intrathoracic stomach occurring in some children, only two patients developed regurgitation and symptoms of poor gastric emptying. There were neither early nor late respiratory problems. Excellent and good functional outcome were achieved in 85% and 15% of the patients, respectively. Two patients have not undergone a weight catch-up phase. The majority of the children have been between the 20th and 80th percentile for weight. Five children remain below the 20th and two below the 5th percentile. The remarkably low morbidity and mortality combined with satisfactory functional results indicate that the total gastric transposition is a safe and easy alternative surgical procedure for esophageal replacement in children.

Cervical repair of esophageal atresia

This report describes three neonates with Type IIIb3 esophageal atresia treated by primary repair utilizing a combined thoracic and cervical approach.

Long-term results of jejunal replacement of the esophagus

Since 1969, jejunal interpositions have been carried out in 19 patients for esophageal replacement. A segment of the upper jejunum was used to bridge the gap in the right thoracic cavity. The distal esophagus and its sphincteric mechanism was preserved in all but four patients, who had peptic strictures. Early postoperative complications such as total necrosis of the graft, perforation of the graft, and anastomotic leak developed in three patients (16%). There were no operative deaths but there were two later deaths (11%). We were able to follow 12 patients over a long term. Among these 12 patients there were two anastomotic strictures, one of which was dilated successfully by bouginage, and one marked redundancy of the jejunum which necessitated surgical correction. Both height and weight were lower than -2 SD on a Japanese standard growth curve in two patients who had anastomotic strictures. Transient stagnation of swallowed barium at the lower esophagus was the common finding; it was observed in seven cases (58%). Only three patients (25%) complained of occasional feelings of delay in swallowing. Stagnation with a mildly redundant jejunum was the common radiologic finding in these three patients. Reflux of the gastric content into the esophagus did not occur. All the patients, except one who still has dysphagia due to anastomotic stricture, can eat anything they wish at almost normal speed. These long-term results indicate that jejunal interposition with preservation of the lower esophagus is a recommendable procedure for esophageal replacement.

Esophageal replacement with whole stomach in infants and children

This is a report of ten patients in whom the esophagus is replaced by the whole stomach brought through the chest. It was used for children with long gap or previously failed esophageal atresia repair. It documents complications (anastomotic leak and stricture) and morbidity, and highlights precautions that must be taken.

Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children

Esophageal replacement by total gastric transposition was performed on 34 infants (32 with esophageal atresia) in the 5.5-year period from January 1981 to June 1986. There were three deaths (9%), two occurring in the early postoperative period, with the third occurring 1 year after surgery from persistent chronic respiratory problems. Fourteen infants had a totally uncomplicated course and have not required further admissions. Thirteen infants had early postoperative problems including six with delayed gastric emptying, four with anastomotic strictures requiring dilatation, and two with radiologic anastomotic leaks. Four late complications consisted of two adhesion intestinal obstructions, a perforation related to a jejunal feeding tube, and a child in whom malabsorption subsequently developed. An excellent result has been obtained in 24 infants, four doing well with only minor problems with feeding, and two are fair experiencing persisting difficulties. These results compare favorably with a large previous experience in colon interposition.

Esophageal mucocele: a complication of blind loop esophagus

Mucocele of the bypassed esophagus is an unusual complication of esophageal replacement and has been described only in isolated references. This report is based on our experience with 6 patients in whom a mucocele developed following esophageal replacement. Esophageal replacement was performed on 37 patients over a 10-year period at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital. A symptomatic mucocele requiring excision developed in 3 patients with achalasia, 1 with congenital tracheoesophageal fistula, 1 with esophageal atresia, and 1 with inflammatory stricture. Conduits used included stomach (4), reversed gastric tube (1), and colon (1). Our experience indicates that conversion of a closed-loop esophagus into a symptomatic mucocele is more likely in the presence of functioning, chronically irritated mucosa. The clinical features were referable to the mucocele itself or respiratory embarrassment therefrom. Thoracic roentgenograms and computed tomographic scans were diagnostic in verifying the presence of the esophageal mucocele. All five mucoceles arose from squamous epithelium. One of 3 patients with achalasia in whom a mucocele developed following esophageal replacement had premalignant changes in the mucosa. Based on this experience, our treatment of choice is early, complete excision of the mucocele.

Gastric transposition via the mediastinal route for infants with long-gap esophageal atresia

Gastric replacement of the esophagus using the posterior mediastinal route is reported in four infants with esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula. The procedure is recommended for the ease with which the operation can be performed and the low incidence of anastomotic complications. Growth and development in the short-term follow-up has been satisfactory and reflux has not been a problem.

Esophageal replacement in infants and children bv colon interposition

Colon replacement for the esophagus was used successfully in 20 of 21 pediatric patients. Intrathoracic placement of the colon segment was done in 18. Careful preparation and operative experience combined to reduce operative morbidity and mortality in an unfortunate group of patients. Satisfactory long-term results have been achieved. Careful technique, attention to detail, and perfection of a single technique may be more important than performing new surgical techniques when they are reported. Colon interposition performed by the Waterston technique utilizing the transverse colon is an effective means of substitution for a diseases esophagus in children.

Colon interposition: a modification of the Waterston technique using the normal esophageal route

Intrathoracic colon interposition in children with esophageal atresia has been available for 30 yr. The retrosternal and left pleural cavity have been the preferred routes. The posterior mediastinal route does not appear to have been tried in children. Sixteen cases treated by the principle author (N.V.F.) using this route are presented. The mortality, anastomotic leakage and stricture rate (at each anastomosis) were 12.5%, respectively. The posterior mediastinal route is suggested as an alternative route for interposition of the colon or any other conduit.