Identification of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Different dose aspirin plus immunoglobulin (DAPI) for prevention of coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease: Study protocol for a multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Kawasaki disease is a pediatric acute systemic vasculitis that specifically involves the coronary arteries. Timely initiation of immunoglobulin plus aspirin is necessary for diminishing the incidence of coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs). The optimal dose of aspirin, however, remains controversial. The trial aims to evaluate if low-dose aspirin is noninferior to moderate-dose in reducing the risk of CAAs during the initial treatment of Kawasaki disease.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, noninferiority trial to be conducted in China. The planned study duration is from 2023 to 2026. Data will be analyzed according to intention-to-treat principles. Participants are children and adolescents under the age of 18 with Kawasaki disease, recruited from the inpatient units. A sample size of 1,346 participants will provide 80% power with a one-sided significance level of 0.025. Qualifying children will be randomized (1:1) to receive either intravenous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg) plus oral moderate-dose aspirin (30-50 mg·kg-1·d-1) until the patient is afebrile for at least 48 hours, or immunoglobulin plus low-dose aspirin (3-5 mg·kg-1·d-1) as initial treatment. The primary outcome will be the occurrence of CAAs at 8 weeks after immunoglobulin infusion. Independent blinded pediatric cardiologists will assess the primary endpoint using echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a shortage of consensus on the dose of aspirin therapy for Kawasaki disease due to the lack of evidence. The results of our randomized trial will provide more concrete evidence for the efficacy and adverse events of low- or moderate-dose aspirin in the acute phase of Kawasaki disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2300072686.

Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.

Comparison of Regularly Scheduled Ibuprofen Versus "Pro Re Nata" for Ankle Sprains in Children Treated in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

We compared pain and degree of disability in patients with acute ankle sprains receiving regular scheduled ibuprofen versus pro re nata (PRN).

METHODS

This study is a randomized single-blinded controlled trial of children aged 7 to 17 years presenting with acute ankle sprain to an emergency department. Patients were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg of ibuprofen per dose (maximum 600 mg) every 6 hours regular scheduled versus PRN. Outcome measures included a 100-mm visual analog scale pain and degree of disability at day 4. A sample size of 72 children had a power of 80% to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 20 mm between the regular and PRN group.

RESULTS

We randomly assigned 99 patients to receive regular scheduled (n = 50) or PRN (n = 49) ibuprofen. Pain scores and degree of disability at day 4 showed no significant differences between groups. The rate of reported adverse effects was higher in the regular scheduled group (11.4% vs 9.5%) versus the PRN group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that there is little benefit from routinely using a regular scheduled ibuprofen regimen for acute pediatric ankle sprains.

Fecal calprotectin in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients related to drug use

BACKGROUND

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) on non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may experience abdominal pain. In adults, NSAID use has been linked to an increase in fecal calprotectin (FC) levels, a surrogate marker for gut inflammation. In JIA, data on gut inflammation related to drug use is scarce.

METHODS

JIA patients followed up at the outpatient pediatric rheumatology clinic in Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland were routinely assessed for FC if they complained about abdominal pain, had an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or used NSAIDs on a daily basis. The FC levels were related to the presence of abdominal pain, to ESR, and to the presence of HLA-B27.

RESULTS

Of the total group of 90 patients (median age 9.1 years; 45 JIA patients with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 25 without DMARD medication, and 20 arthralgia patients as controls), approximately 50% used NSAIDs, of whom 40% complained about abdominal pain. In patients with abdominal pain, one-third had elevated FC values (>100 μg/g). The FC values, for the most part, declined along with the discontinuation or reduction of NSAIDs and after intensifying the DMARD medication, where after the pain disappeared. In patients with an elevated ESR, the FC values and ESR normalized in parallel. The presence of HLA-B27 was not associated with FC levels.

CONCLUSION

In patients with JIA and abdominal pain, it may be useful to determine the FC when evaluating the need for further gastrointestinal examinations.

Systemic arthritis in children: a review of clinical presentation and treatment

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) constitutes a small part of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), yet has a disproportionally higher rate of mortality. Despite being grouped under JIA, it is considered to be a multifactorial autoinflammatory disease. The objective of this paper is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical manifestations, complications, therapy, prognosis, and outcome of sJIA. The presentation and clinical manifestations of sJIA have not changed much in the past several decades, but the collective understanding of the pathogenesis and the development of new targeted therapies (particularly the biologic agents) have transformed and improved the disease outcome for children with sJIA.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prescribing habits of NSAIDs among pediatric medical and surgical practitioners, and to examine concerns and barriers to their use.

METHODS

A sample of 1289 pediatricians, pediatric rheumatologists, sports medicine physicians, pediatric surgeons and pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the United States and Canada were sent an email link to a 22-question web-based survey.

RESULTS

338 surveys (28%) were completed, 84 were undeliverable. Of all respondents, 164 (50%) had never prescribed a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) NSAID. The most common reasons for ever prescribing an NSAID were musculoskeletal pain, soft-tissue injury, fever, arthritis, fracture, and headache. Compared to traditional NSAIDs, selective COX-2 NSAIDs were believed to be as safe (42%) or safer (24%); have equal (52%) to greater efficacy (20%) for pain; have equal (59%) to greater efficacy (15%) for inflammation; and have equal (39%) to improved (44%) tolerability. Pediatric rheumatologists reported significantly more frequent abdominal pain (81% vs. 23%), epistaxis (13% vs. 2%), easy bruising (64% vs. 8%), headaches (21% vs. 1%) and fatigue (12% vs. 1%) for traditional NSAIDs than for selective COX-2 NSAIDs. Prescribing habits of NSAIDs have changed since the voluntary withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib; 3% of pediatric rheumatologists reported giving fewer traditional NSAID prescriptions, and while 57% reported giving fewer selective COX-2 NSAIDs, 26% reported that they no longer prescribed these medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional and selective COX-2 NSAIDs were perceived as safe by pediatric specialists. The data were compared to the published pediatric safety literature.

Comparative tolerability of treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) includes several forms of chronic arthritis in children. Treatments are chosen according to the type and severity of the disease. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids remain the mainstays of therapy. Traditional slower acting anti-rheumatic drugs, such as gold therapy, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, tiopronin and hydroxychloroquine, are usually poorly active in children. In addition, adverse effects are common, including severe macrophage activation syndrome with gold therapy or sulfasalazine. Low dose, once weekly methotrexate has emerged as the therapeutic agent of choice for children who fail to respond adequately to the administration of an NSAID, especially in those with the extended oligoarticular subtype of the disease. Other immunosuppressive agents, such as cyclosporin, are sometimes combined with methotrexate. In recent years, novel treatments have been developed. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is effective in a number of children with severe JIA, whose disease has been refractory to conventional therapy. However, only short term follow-up data are currently available for this novel therapy. In addition, severe infections complicated by macrophage activation syndrome and death have been reported. Finally, anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha therapy has shown efficacy in more than two-thirds of children with JIA and polyarthritis, and other cytokine inhibitors may be soon available.

A prospective study comparing celecoxib with naproxen in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of celecoxib and naproxen in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, subjects with JRA were randomized to receive a target dose of celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid or 6 mg/kg bid, or a target dose of naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid for 12 weeks (maximum allowed dose=600 mg total daily dose). The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of responders at Week 12 attaining the American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30% improvement criterion (ACR Pediatric-30).

RESULTS

Both celecoxib doses were at least as effective as naproxen at Week 12 [ACR Pediatric-30 treatment differences: celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid-naproxen=1.36% (95% CI -13.08 to 15.80); celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid-naproxen=13.02% (95% CI -0.22 to 26.25)]. Celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid had a numerically higher response rate than celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid at all postrandomization visits and a numerically higher response rate than naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Improvement in each ACR Pediatric-30 core set measure was comparable to or numerically higher for celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid than naproxen or celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid. Adverse event rates were similar for all treatment groups, except that gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the naproxen group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid and 6 mg/kg bid were at least as effective as naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid in treating the signs and symptoms of JRA over 12 weeks. All treatments were generally well tolerated.

Update on nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses recent concerns about the cardiovascular safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the disease-modifying role of these drugs in ankylosing spondylitis, and their use in the understudied pediatric population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent observational and controlled studies highlight the cardiovascular toxicity of rofecoxib, celecoxib, parecoxib, valdecoxib and naproxen. Concerns about cardiovascular safety raise questions about the chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatic diseases, including children. The risks of these drugs in the pediatric population are not well known and this review addresses the limited data available concerning nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in children. A recent trial in ankylosing spondylitis patients demonstrated continuous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use reduced the rate of syndesmophyte formation, suggesting that they may have a disease-modifying role in these patients.

SUMMARY

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been in the spotlight this year. While preliminary evidence has supported novel roles for these drugs in ankylosing spondylitis and in cancer prevention, accumulating evidence shows that some cyclooxygenase-2 and perhaps all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with cardiovascular toxicity. Further research is needed to understand the magnitude and mechanism of this risk. Clinicians are compelled to weigh carefully the benefits and risks of therapy. Concerns about safety are balanced by optimism about their potential role in delaying the progression of ankylosing spondylitis.

Upper gastrointestinal complications associated with NSAIDs in children

OBJECTIVE

To analyse serious upper gastrointestinal (UGI) complications associated with non-salicylate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children.

METHODS

All serious UGI complications associated with non-salicylate NSAIDs approved in France to treat moderate pain or fever in children, spontaneously reported to the French Pharmacovigilance system or to the companies, between the launching of each study drug in France to December 31, 2000.

RESULTS

Serious UGI complications were reported in 61 children aged from 11 months to 15 years during treatment with niflumic acid (27), ibuprofen (23) and tiaprofenic acid (11). No case was reported with ketoprofen. UGI manifestations were UGI bleeding (15) and 46 gastrointestinal symptoms with endoscopic lesions i.e. gastritis (18), gastric ulcer (13), duodenal ulcer (7), duodenitis (4) and oesophageal ulcer (4). NSAID was combined with a salicylate in 36% of cases, given by the parents in self medication in 6.6% of cases and used outside its product licence in 33.8% of cases.

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs used in children for fever or moderate pain are associated with a risk of serious UGI complications which increases with length, dose and association with a salicylate.

Médicaments contre-indiqués chez l’enfant : analyse des prescriptions en médecine de ville dans le département de l’Aude

AIMS

The aim of this study was to describe prescriptions of drugs contra-indicated in children according to the summary product characteristics (SPC) of the drugs.

METHODS

An exhaustive cross-sectional study based on the data used by the French Health Insurance in the Aude Department (France) during 2001 was carried out to identify all instances where children under the age of 15 years were prescribed a drug that stated in its SPC that its use in this age group was contraindicated.

RESULTS

The prescription of drugs stated as being contraindicated in children under the age of 15 years involved 4316 children. The incidence rate was 116 per 1000 child-years. It was patently obvious for two classes of drugs: nasal decongestants (21.0% of prescriptions) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (16.9%). These prescriptions were made by 610 physicians, of which 70% were general practitioners, 8% dentists and 3% paediatricians.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high incidence of children receiving contraindicated drugs in Aude department in France. This work highlights the need for, first, the widespread dissemination of information on the good use of drugs in children and, secondly, specific clinical trials performed in children.

Digestive endoscopy in neonates

Since the introduction of flexible fiberoptic endoscopy in the early 1970s, esophagogastro-duodenoscopy and colonoscopy have become established procedures for the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal tract disease in the pediatric population. The development of safe fiberoptic endoscopes specially designed for neonates has allowed visualization of lesions occurring in the first days of life. Despite an increased understanding of neonatal digestive disorders deriving from this new diagnostic modality, there is little consensus on the appropriate use of endoscopic procedures in routine care of neonates. It is the feeling of the authors that widening the indications of endoscopy in the neonatal period might lead to diagnosis of discrete clinical abnormalities, which might improve the care of neonates. The techniques for performing neonatal endoscopies, the appropriate indications, the common normal and pathologic findings and the complications of these procedures are reviewed.

Pediatric Rheumatology for the Adult Rheumatologist I

Treatment of children with rheumatic diseases has advanced with novel therapeutics and the use of early aggressive treatment to achieve better long-term functional outcome. Many of the current treatments in pediatric rheumatology are based on studies in adults on medications without U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling for pediatric use. This is not ideal because the pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) of many medications when used in children vary according to age, somatic growth, sexual maturity, and ontogeny of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Special dosing, administration considerations, and toxicity screening are reviewed for the more commonly used medications. Vaccinations for children on antirheumatic drugs are also discussed. Continued study of the long-term impact of medications and biologic treatments on children is necessary, but given the paucity of children with rheumatic diseases, this will require multicentered trials and collaborations. Lastly, this article reviews recent regulatory and legislative action on pediatric drug testing. Passage of the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, which requires testing of pharmaceuticals in children, will facilitate more rational use of drugs in pediatric rheumatic diseases in the future.

Asymptomatic gastritis in naproxen‐treated North Indian children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Aims:  Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the agents of choice in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). While NSAIDs have been associated with gastritis in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), not much is known about children with JRA. In this prospective study we set out to evaluate 31 children with JRA, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria given by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).

Methods:  All patients had received naproxen for at least 3 months prior to their enrolment. Mean age of children was 9.02 years (range 2.5–16 years) with the male : female ratio being 1.8 : 1 (boys 20; girls 11). Eleven (35.5%) patients had polyarticular, 15 (48.4%) had pauciarticular and the remaining five (16.1%) had systemic onset JRA. Duration of disease varied from 5–84 months (mean ± 2, SD = 25.32 ± 20 months) with a mean duration of therapy of 14.19 months (range 4–72 months). Six patients had complaints of mild non‐specific upper abdominal pain.

Results:  On upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination none of the children showed any significant gross findings. However, histopathology of antral biopsies showed features of active and/or chronic gastritis in almost all the patients. Helicobacter pylori was identified in 16 (51.8%) of these on hematoxylin and eosin staining and the findings were confirmed with Giemsa/Gram staining. Fourteen (85.5%) were also positive by the rapid urease test (RUT). Ten of the 16 patients with H. pylori infection showed evidence of active inflammation in the antral biopsies.

Conclusions:  Asymptomatic gastritis is a common finding in children with JRA who are receiving naproxen. There appears to be no correlation between the presence of H. pylori infection or histological gastritis and presence of abdominal symptoms in children with JRA.

Chemical gastropathy: a distinct histopathologic entity in children

BACKGROUND

Chemical gastropathy, also known as chemical or reactive gastritis, is a well-described histopathologic entity in adults. It is characterized by presence of foveolar hyperplasia, vascular congestion, lamina propria edema, and prominent smooth muscle fibers in the absence of inflammatory cells in the gastric antral mucosa. There are no data in children on this condition.

METHODS

All children showing features of chemical gastropathy in antral biopsy specimens were identified from pathology database from 1997 to 2000. Antral biopsy specimens were reviewed to assess the diagnosis of chemical gastropathy using standard diagnostic criteria. Charts of the children diagnosed with chemical gastropathy were reviewed for clinical course, endoscopic findings, and risk factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-one children (12 male, 9 female) with chemical gastropathy were identified. Common presenting symptoms were epigastric pain and vomiting. Eleven children were taking multiple medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Endoscopy revealed esophagitis in 12, antral erythema in 7, and thick bile in the stomach in 7 children. Antral histology revealed foveolar hyperplasia in 19, congestion in 20, lamina propria edema and smooth muscle fibers in 16, and absence of inflammation in 19 patients. Acid suppression was the treatment in all patients. Mean follow-up duration was 11 months in 17 children. Symptoms resolved completely in 11 and partially in 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

As in adults, chemical gastropathy occurs in children. The factors associated with chemical gastropathy in this survey were gastroesophageal reflux disease and intake of multiple medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Treatment of rheumatic diseases in children: special considerations

The goals of treatment of rheumatic diseases in children are to control the disease process while ensuring normal nutrition, growth, and development. The choice of antirheumatic drugs is similar in children and adults, but the doses, treatment schedules, and susceptibility to toxicity can differ considerably. In addition to differences between adult and pediatric diseases themselves, it is important for the rheumatologist who treats children to be cognizant of the impact of nutritional, developmental, and growth issues and differential susceptibility to toxicity of various treatments.

Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children: a comparison with paracetamol

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) possess antipyretic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. They are frequently used in children and have numerous therapeutic indications, the most common ones being fever, postoperative pain and inflammatory disorders, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and Kawasaki disease. Their major mechanism of action is through inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by blockade of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). The disposition of most NSAIDs has been mainly studied in infants > or = 2 years of age. Compared with adults, the volume of distribution and clearance of NSAIDs such as diclofenac, ibuprofen (infants aged between 3 months and 2.5 years), ketorolac and nimesulide were increased in children. The elimination half-life was similar in children to that in adults. These pharmacokinetic differences might be clinically significant with the need for higher loading and/or maintenance doses in children. Ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and acetaminophen are the most frequently used agents for fever reduction in children. Over the past 20 years, because of the association between ASA use and Reye's syndrome, most of the interest has been directed toward ibuprofen and acetaminophen. In view of its comparable antipyretic efficacy, but superior tolerability profile, acetaminophen, when used appropriately with age-adapted formulations, should remain the first-line therapy in the treatment of childhood fever. At the moment, there is no scientific evidence to recommend simultaneous use of these two antipyretic drugs. Most NSAIDs provide mild to moderate analgesia, with the exception of ketorolac which has a strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac, ketoprofen, diclofenac and ibuprofen in the treatment of postoperative pain has been mainly studied following a single dose, in children of > or = 1 year of age undergoing minor surgeries. In this setting, when used either alone or in adjunct to caudal or epidural anaesthesia, they were associated with an opioid-sparing effect and were well tolerated. With the exception of ketorolac use in children undergoing tonsillectomy, where controversy exists regarding the risk of postoperative haemorrhage, NSAIDs have not been associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. NSAIDs are the first-line therapy in JIA. They appear to be equally effective and tolerated, with the exception of ASA which is associated with more adverse effects. ASA has been used for many years in the treatment of Kawasaki disease and is part of the standard modality of treatment in combination with intravenous gammaglobulins. More recently, lung inflammation associated with cystic fibrosis (CF) has become a new target for NSAIDs. Despite promising preliminary results with ibuprofen, numerous questions need to be answered before this new strategy becomes part of the conventional treatment of patients with CF. In summary, NSAIDs are effective in reducing fever, alleviating pain and reducing inflammation in children, with a good tolerance profile. Pharmacokinetic studies are needed to characterise the disposition of NSAIDs in very young infants in order to use them rationally. To date, no studies have been published on the disposition, tolerability and efficacy of specific COX-2 inhibitors in children. Further clinical experience with these agents in adults is warranted before undergoing trials with specific COX-2 inhibitors in children.

Current treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Prognostic factors in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) include polyarticular onset, polyarticular disease course, and rheumatoid factor positivity; in the systemic onset subtype, persistence of systemic features at 6 months after onset confers a worse prognosis. Timely diagnosis and appropriate aggressive treatment of patients with poor prognostic features improve quality of life and outcome. After nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, methotrexate is the most commonly used second-line agent. However, approximately one third of patients do not respond to methotrexate adequately. Randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in patients with JRA are few, but one such trial with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor etanercept shows that this drug is effective and well-tolerated. Other recently approved agents for rheumatoid arthritis, including infliximab, leflunomide, celecoxib, and rofecoxib, have not been adequately studied in pediatric patients, and the role of these agents in children with JRA remains to be determined.

Gastroesophageal endoscopic findings and gastrointestinal symptoms in preterm neonates with and without perinatal indomethacin exposure

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether perinatal indomethacin treatment has effects on the development of esophageal and gastric lesions in preterm infants and to evaluate other potential etiologic factors behind these lesions.

METHODS

Sixty-nine infants were born at less than 33 weeks' gestation. Forty-five of these infants underwent treatment with perinatal indomethacin (study group) and 24 did not (control group). All underwent upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and biopsy during the neonatal period. The correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal endoscopic findings, and the factors correlating with the development of esophageal and gastric mucosal lesions was evaluated.

RESULTS

Abnormal endoscopic findings were equally common in the study group (77.8%) and in controls (83.3%). There was no dependence between gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings because only 15 infants (21.7%) were symptomatic before endoscopy. The interval between endoscopy and the last perinatal indomethacin dose correlated significantly with abnormal esophageal findings and gastric mucosal lesions. Shorter duration of enteral feeding before endoscopy correlated with greater risk of abnormal esophageal findings. Older gestational age and need of ventilator treatment at the time of endoscopy remained the risk factors associated with abnormal gastric findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal and gastric lesions diagnosed by endoscopy correlate poorly with the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients. Short duration of enteral feeding seems to be correlated with an increased risk of esophageal mucosal lesions, increasing gestational age and ventilator treatment with gastric mucosal lesions, and perinatal indomethacin with esophageal and gastric mucosal lesions in preterm infants. Ventilator-treated preterm infants not receiving enteral nutrition and patients with indomethacin exposure might benefit from ulcer prophylaxis.

Peptic ulcer disease in children

A peptic ulcer in a child looks the same as it does in an adult, and many of the aetiologies of peptic ulcer disease in children are similar to those in adults. However, there are many differences between children and adults, especially in the areas of clinical presentation, the prevalences of different types of ulcer disease, and the prevalence of complications of ulcer disease. Therefore the approach to diagnosis and management in children is often at variance with that in adults. One important example is the approach to suspected Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) disease in children, in which consensus groups have advised a considerably different approach in children. While the chapter deals with the full range of peptic ulcer disease in children, the focus is on those aspects in which there are differences between adults and children.

The effects of high-dose ibuprofen and pancreatic enzymes on the intestine of the rat

BACKGROUND

High-dose ibuprofen therapy limits the progression of lung disease in patients with cystic fibrosis. However, ibuprofen increases intestinal permeability, which potentiates intestinal damage caused by high-dose pancreatic enzyme treatment, as was shown in a previous study by this group. In the present study, the combined effects of ibuprofen and pancreatic enzyme treatment on the intestine and liver were examined.

METHODS

Using a chronically catheterized rat model, high-dose ibuprofen (60 mg/kg x day in two doses), with or without pancreatic enzyme treatment was infused into gastric and duodenal catheters, respectively, for 20 days. Six groups were studied: control group; ibuprofen treatment alone; pancreatic enzyme treatment alone (two groups: normal dose, 10,000 U lipase/kg x day and high dose, 40,000 U lipase/kg x day); and ibuprofen combined with pancreatic enzyme (two groups: ibuprofen with high-dose pancreatic enzyme and ibuprofen and low-dose pancreatic enzyme). After treatment, rats were autopsied, and complete histologic analyses of the entire intestine and liver were performed.

RESULTS

Ibuprofen caused mild ulceration of the small intestine in 50% of rats. Pancreatic enzyme treatment alone did not induce ulceration of the intestine. The combination of pancreatic enzyme and ibuprofen treatment increased the severity of the ulcers in the small intestine but not the number of ulcers or the percentage of rats affected. Ibuprofen treatment alone did not cause ulcers in the large intestine, but with the addition of pancreatic enzymes, ulceration and fibrosis were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibuprofen at doses used to limit progression of cystic fibrosis lung disease caused enteropathy in 50% of rats. There was synergism between ibuprofen and pancreatic enzyme treatment in the production of severe ulcers. Ulcers in the cecum and colon were increased with combined ibuprofen and pancreatic enzyme treatment compared with incidence in control animals.

Toxicity of antirheumatic and anti-inflammatory drugs in children

The aim of the study was to describe the long-term toxicity of antirheumatic and anti-inflammatory drugs in a paediatric rheumatology clinic population. One hundred and seventeen children were studied on first admission to a paediatric rheumatology clinic and after a mean of 8.6 +/- 0.4 years of follow-up. Medical records from the intermediate period were reviewed. The patients had 155 exposures to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 88 exposures to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and 12 exposures of prednisolone during a total of 682 patient years. Drug toxicity was measured in terms of the number of toxic events, number of drug discontinuations due to toxicity, number of side-effects per patient year of drug exposure and as a toxicity index. Side-effects were seen in 69 (27%) of the drug exposures, corresponding to 0.10 toxic events per patient year of exposure. Abdominal pain was the most common side-effect, and was reported in 21 (14%) of the exposures to NSAIDs. Five severely toxic events, all leading to hospitalisation, occurred. The toxicity of NSAIDs was not significantly different from that of DMARDs with regard to the number of toxic events (21% and 31%, respectively, NS) and drug discontinuations due to toxicity (17% and 14%, respectively, NS). Piroxicam tended to be more toxic than ibuprofen (46% versus 18% toxic events, p <0.05; 36% versus 16% discontinuations due to toxicity, NS; 0.33 versus 0.05 side-effects per patient year and a toxicity index of 1.45 versus 0.20 units per patient year). Gold tended to be more toxic than antimalarials (41% versus 15% toxic events, p<0.05; 24% versus 12% discontinuations, NS; 0.37 versus 0.08 side-effects per patient year and a toxicity index of 1.56 versus 0.23 units per patient year). It was concluded that antirheumatic and anti-inflammatory drugs led to side-effects in 27% of the exposed children during 9 years of follow-up. There was an overlap of the toxicity of certain NSAIDs and the most commonly employed DMARDs.

The future potential of eicosanoids and their inhibitors in paediatric practice

Eicosanoids may have many potential uses in paediatric practice. Since E-type prostaglandins were first applied to treat ductus-dependent congenital heart diseases in paediatric practice, many eicosanoid-related drugs have been examined for the treatment of pathophysiological conditions in children. Prostaglandins (PG), thromboxane (TX) and leukotrienes (LT), produced from arachidonic acid in the phospholipids of cell membranes, are considered to be biologically active eicosanoids. Corticosteroids reduce eicosanoid production by impairing phospholipase A2 activation, while cyclo-oxygenase inhibiting drugs such as the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) suppress PG and TX production. PGE1 (alprostadil) and PGE2 (dinoprostone) therapy has been shown to improve oxygenation in neonates whose pulmonary and systemic blood flow are dependent on a patent ductus arteriosus, while epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI2) and beraprost (beraprost sodium), another PGI2 analogue, are often effective as acute vasodilators in paediatric pulmonary hypertension. Synthetic PGE analogues such as misoprostol have gastric antisecretory and cytoprotective effects, and are effective in both prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal mucosal lesions. Both alprostadil and epoprostenol have been shown to be effective in treating peripheral vascular and skin diseases. Since TX, a platelet aggregator and vasoconstrictor, has been implicated as a potential mediator of asthma, its inhibition by agents such as seratrodast (AA-2414) and ozagrel (OKY-046) has proven effective in the treatment of adult patients with asthma; studies of these agents in paediatric patients is awaited with interest. Developing the clinical use of eicosanoid-related drugs and assessing the potential use of these drugs requires a 3-phase approach: reducing the complications in the treatment of neonates with ductus-dependent congenital heart diseases and primary pulmonary hypertension requiring PGE1, PGE2 and PGI2 therapy; conducting clinical trials of the synthesis inhibitors and receptor antagonists of TXA2 and LT that have already been used in the treatment of adult patients with bronchial asthma; and evaluating the efficacy of new modulators of eicosanoid biosynthesis, such as eicosapentaenoic acid and antiallergy drugs, in the treatment of eicosanoid-related diseases in children.

Management of rheumatic diseases in children

Rheumatic diseases are one of the common groups of chronic diseases of childhood. They are multifactorial in origin and tend to involve multiple organ systems. Consequently management of these diseases requires the expertise of many health and allied health professionals. This review article focuses on the medical management of three of the relatively common diseases: juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), systemic lupus erythematozus (SLE) and dermatomyositis (DM).

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of abdominal pain and gastroduodenal injury in children with arthritis taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of all children (570 patients) receiving followup care in an academic rheumatology clinic between 1991 and 1993 was performed.

RESULTS

There were 344 patients who used NSAIDs during the study period. Abdominal pain was recorded in 27.9% of patients taking NSAIDs and 14.6% of patients not taking NSAIDs. Abdominal pain in 47 patients (49%) taking NSAIDs and 14 patients (42%) not taking NSAIDs was evaluated radiographically and/or endoscopically. Among those patients evaluated, gastric or duodenal injury was found in 16 (34.0%) who were taking NSAIDs and 1 (7.1%) who were not. This represented a relative risk for gastroduodenal injury of 4.8 for patients taking NSAIDs (P = 0.09). The incidence of injury did not change when analyses were controlled for prednisone or slow-acting antirheumatic drug use. None of the children were hospitalized or died as a result of gastroduodenal injury during the 3-year period.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that NSAID use in children with arthritis frequently leads to gastroduodenal injury, with an estimated incidence and relative risk that are comparable to the rates found in adults with arthritis taking NSAIDs, but that hospitalization or death as a result of this injury is uncommon.

Experience with misoprostol therapy for NSAID gastropathy in children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, on the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration and on the haemoglobin value, in children.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of children attending the paediatric rheumatology clinic at a tertiary referral hospital over a three year period, who were receiving NSAIDs and were prescribed misoprostol for treatment of GIT symptoms or anaemia.

RESULTS

Twenty five children (mean age 12.0 (SD 2.8) (range 7-17) years were prescribed misoprostol (mean dose 308.4 (76.5) micrograms/m2/day; 9.8 (2.5) micrograms/kg/day) while NSAID therapy was continued. Of the 22 (88%) patients with GIT complaints, 18 (82%) had complete resolution of symptoms and two (9%) had some improvement. Four patients (18%) had a recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution while still receiving misoprostol. Misoprostol therapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in haemoglobin concentration (mean value before misoprostol 115 (18) g/l; after misoprostol 126 (15) g/l (p = 0.02)). The only adverse effect reported was self limited diarrhoea in one child.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol appeared to be effective in the treatment of GIT symptoms in children receiving NSAIDs and to result in significant increase in the haemoglobin concentration. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the role of misoprostol therapy for NSAID associated GIT complaints in the paediatric population.

Gastroesophageal reflux: one reason why baby won't eat

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is the movement of gastric contents retrograde into the esophagus. Sometimes the refluxate is seen as emesis, but often reflux is "silent," meaning that there are no discrete symptoms during an episode. In adults, the most common symptom of GER is heartburn, whereas in infancy excessive crying and malaise are symptoms that prompt investigation for GER, with or without esophagitis. Symptoms of esophagitis in infancy may include arching (hyperextension) of the torso and refusal of feedings. Tube feedings may be required to treat infants with failure to thrive who refuse oral feedings. Paradoxically, tube feedings increase the number of GER episodes. A hypothetical explanation for refusal of food in infancy is that pain with swallowing (odynophagia) or heartburn are consequences of peptic esophagitis. As a result, infants will learn to refuse food if it hurts or if they fear that it will hurt to eat. Another possible mechanism is visceral hyperalgesia, a neuropathic condition in which prior experience changes sensory nerves so that previously innocuous stimuli are perceived as painful. Some infants may have especially sensitive sensory nerves in the upper gastrointestinal tract, which predisposes visceral hyperalgesia to develop. Thus pain occurs from luminal distension or acid reflux in the absence of tissue damage. The evaluation of babies who won't eat includes a careful history and physical examination to exclude the possibility of chronic systemic illness. Refusal to feed is an unusual manifestation of a common condition: GER disease. The initial tests for GER usually include a barium swallow study to assess the upper gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopy and esophageal biopsy to assess esophagitis, and an intraesophageal pH study, which is useful in "silent" reflux to quantitate the duration of esophageal acid exposure and to correlate discrete symptom episodes with periods of reflux. The treatment of infants and toddlers who refuse to eat because of pain resulting from visceral hyperalgesia or reflux esophagitis involves removing the pain associated with eating and making eating a pleasurable experience. Treatment for esophagitis may include maintaining an upright posture after meals and thickened feeds, medication to improve gastrointestinal motility or to decrease acid secretion, or fundoplication.